Professional Documents
Culture Documents
20 http://www.shanlaxjournals.in
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
http://www.shanlaxjournals.in 21
Shanlax
International Journal of Education
Objectives of the Study Analysis and Interpretation of Data
The investigator has framed the following Hypothesis 1
objectives for the study: There exists a significant difference in the mean
1. To highlight the salient aspects of Behaviour scores of Awareness of Behaviour Modification
Modification. Techniques among Secondary Grade Teachers in
2. To find out the extent of Awareness of terms of Gender.
Behaviour Modification Techniques among
Secondary Grade Teachers. Table 1: Difference due to Gender
“t”
Gender N Mean SD Sig.
Population and Sample value
The population for the study comprises of Male
Secondary Grade Teachers serving in Sivagangai 45 76.44 9.38
Teachers
District. The sample for the study consists of 90 0.65 NS
Female
Secondary Grade Teachers serving in Schools run 45 77.69 8.78
Teachers
by Government and Management. The sampling df=88; t(0.05) = 1.96; t(0.01) = 2.58
technique used for the study is a random sampling.
Survey Method has been adopted for the study. Interpretation
The sample includes both genders drawn with The calculated “t” value 0.65 is less than the
varied characteristics or sub-variables viz., Type table value. “t” value is not significant at any level.
of Institution working, Locality they hail from, Hence the research hypothesis is not accepted. There
Qualification, Experience etc. exists no significant difference in the mean scores of
Awareness of Behaviour Modification Techniques
Tools Used among Secondary Grade Teachers in terms of
Behaviour Modification Questionnaire Gender.
This is a standard tool developed by
Vijayalakshmi N conforming to the tests of validity
Hypothesis 2
and reliability. There are 25 items of the scale. There
There exists a significant difference in the mean
are five responses to each stimulus (statements) viz.,
scores of Awareness of Behaviour Modification
SA – Strongly Agree, A – Agree, N – Neutral. D
Techniques among Secondary Grade Teachers in
– Disagree and D – Strongly Disagree. This is the
terms of Type of Institution.
Likert type of Scale. A score of 5 is given for the
response SA, 4 for A, 3 for N, 2 for D and 1 for
SD for items of Positive Polarity. For items coming Table 2: Difference due to Type of Institution
under negative polarity, the scoring is done under (Government Vs Management)
reverse order. Type of “t”
N Mean SD Sig.
Institution value
Data Analysis Government
45 75.16 8.54
Data will be analysed using statistical techniques Schools
2.04 S
such as Mean, Standard Deviation, and t-Test. Management
45 78.98 9.24
Schools
Limitations of the Study df = 88; t(0.05) = 1.96; t(0.01) = 2.58
1. The study is limited to Secondary Grade
Teachers. Interpretation
2. The study is limited to certain schools in The calculated “t” value 2.04 is more than the
Sivagangai District. table value. “t” value is significant at 0.05 level.
Hence the research hypothesis is accepted. There
exists a significant difference in the mean scores of
22 http://www.shanlaxjournals.in
Shanlax
International Journal of Education shanlax
#SINCE1990
Awareness of Behaviour Modification Techniques Hence the research hypothesis is not accepted. There
among Secondary Grade Teachers in terms of exists no significant difference in the mean scores of
Type of Institution. Management School Teachers Awareness of Behaviour Modification Techniques
exhibit more awareness of Behaviour Modification among Secondary Grade Teachers in terms of
Techniques. Qualification.
Hypothesis 3 Hypothesis 5
There exists a significant difference in the mean There exists a significant difference in the mean
scores of Awareness of Behaviour Modification scores of Awareness of Behaviour Modification
Techniques among Secondary Grade Teachers in Techniques among Secondary Grade Teachers in
terms of Locality they hail from. terms of Experience.
Interpretation Interpretation
The calculated “t” value 2.11 is more than the The calculated “t” value 0.82 is less than the
table value. “t” value is significant at 0.05 level. table value. “t” value is not significant at any level.
Hence the research hypothesis is accepted. There Hence the research hypothesis is not accepted. There
exists a significant difference in the mean scores of exists no significant difference in the mean scores of
Awareness of Behaviour Modification Techniques Awareness of Behaviour Modification Techniques
among Secondary Grade Teachers in terms of among Secondary Grade Teachers in terms of
Locality they hail from. Teachers hailing from Experience.
rural area exhibit more awareness of Behaviour
Modification Techniques. Findings of the Study
The calculated “t” value 0.65 is less than the
Hypothesis 4 table value. There exists no significant difference
There exists a significant difference in the mean in the mean scores of Awareness of Behaviour
scores of Awareness of Behaviour Modification Modification Techniques among Secondary Grade
Techniques among Secondary Grade Teachers in Teachers in terms of Gender.
terms of Qualification. The calculated “t” value 0.58 is less than the
table value. There exists no significant difference
Table 4: Difference due to Qualification in the mean scores of Awareness of Behaviour
“t” Modification Techniques among Secondary Grade
Qualification N Mean SD Sig.
value Teachers in terms of Type of Institution.
High 41 76.05 9.10 The calculated “t” value 1.88 is less than the
0.97 NS table value. There exists no significant difference
Low 49 77.92 9.02
in the mean scores of Awareness of Behaviour
df=88; t(0.05) = 1.96; t(0.01) = 2.58
Modification Techniques among Secondary Grade
Teachers in terms of Locality they hail from.
Interpretation
The calculated “t” value 0.97 is less than the
The calculated “t” value 0.97 is less than the
table value. There exists no significant difference
table value. “t” value is not significant at any level.
in the mean scores of Awareness of Behaviour
http://www.shanlaxjournals.in 23
Shanlax
International Journal of Education
Modification Techniques among Secondary Grade
Teachers in terms of Qualification. References
The calculated “t” value 0.82 is less than the Best, John, W., ‘Research in Education’, 1992, P.11.
table value. There exists no significant difference Borg Walter R and Meredith Damien Gall,
in the mean scores of Awareness of Behaviour Educational Research, 1976, P. 59.
Modification Techniques among Secondary Grade Chauhan, S.S. (2002): Advanced Educational
Teachers in terms of Experience. Psychology. Vikas Publishing House, New
Delhi.
Conclusion Creemers, B. (1994) ‘The effective classroom’,
It will be laudable if one is endowed with Cassell, London.
skills to lead a full-fledged desirable life style. It Dandapani (2002) - Advanced Educational
always doesn’t happen that persons are infused Psychology, Second Edition, Anmol
with desirable psychological and social traits. The Publication, Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
behaviour of a person needs modification; the degrees Donald Meichenbaum (1977), Cognitive Behaviour
of modification may differ. Emotional Intelligence, Modification, Scandinavian Journal of
Stress Coping, Peer Influence, Cognitive Behaviour Behaviour Therapy, vol. 6, no. 4, DOI:
Modification (CBM) are the strategies that could 10.1080/16506073.1977.9626708 p. 185-192.
be adopted for modifying the behaviour of the Garrett, Henry E, Statistics in Psychology and
individual. Teachers who are the role models for the Education, 1971.
students should be aware of the need for behaviour
modification and the techniques involved in the
same.
Author Details
Dr.N.Vijayalakshmi, Principal, S.Preethi B.Ed College for Women, Arasanoor, Sivaganagai, Tamil Nadu, India
24 http://www.shanlaxjournals.in