Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Position Paper
Position Paper
Introduction
The world is in trouble today. Nevertheless, according to David Bosch, the word crisis is "the
point where danger and opportunity meet, where the future is in balance and where events can
go either way."1 The situation affects all persons, countries, cultures and religions. Different
organisations and sectors around the world are contributing their expertise and energy to
minimize the effects of the Covid-19 Pandemic, if not to fully avoid it. The world has become
modern, and even the global fear caused by this dreaded disease has also become global. A
global village has a global epidemic, and we look forward to a global solution and global
opportunity if the world has a global problem.
Religion will lead society towards the flourishing of the earth and humans. We can still see
light in the gloom brought on by the pandemic. Religion gives life meaning beset with issues that
seem to be without any solution. Humanity has dreamed of a future that is free from all pain and
problems, though modernity has made it more conceivably possible through science and
technology. Yet, mankind faces a threat once more. "It is argued that: "A significant proportion
of these are:
If not for the authoritarian behavior, malevolent choices, greed, contempt, and ill will of others,
misery need not occur." 2 The problem is too big that it is now spreading throughout the global
village." In coping with the Covid-19 Pandemic, interreligious dialogue opens the door to the
possibility of harmony rather than diversity.
Interreligious Dialogue
People from different places have their own cultures and religions that we must respect in
order to preserve peace. We need to understand each other’s culture to appreciate each other.
In order to break down the barriers of division that are at the core of most conflicts, interreligious
dialogue is a difficult mechanism by which members of various religious traditions approach
each other. Peace is the purpose of interreligious dialogue. Some principles for successful
interreligious dialogue include the following: 1. The experience should not be used by
participants in interfaith dialogue as an excuse to justify their own traditions. 2. Neither is
interreligious dialogue a way of commonly defending religion. 3. The possibility of conversion is
present. By the interfaith experience, participants can find themselves transformed. 4.
Participants in the conversation must reveal the values they hold nearest to each other and that
characterize their religious tradition. 5. Interreligious dialogue is not an exercise that is
metaphysical, spiritual or academic. It is an expression of the lives of faith lived by the
participants. Interfaith experiences thus shape communities of understanding.
Guidelines for interfaith dialogue are given by the World Council of Churches, different
theologians and several other resources. Those mentioned above are gleaned from various
sources. According to this author's understanding of the dialogical method, several items were
omitted and others were extended.
Finally, because the purpose of interfaith dialogue is harmony, the process must be peaceful.
It is necessary to recognize that peace is not easily attained and sustained. It may be a peaceful
operation, but it is kind of like climbing Everest. Peace does not happen in a day, and as intrepid
travelers battle the path to heights where the human spirit can soar, there are obstacles.
Conclusion
Science and religion both offer their own responses to the pain and misery of life. In
collaboration and cooperation, medical professionals, scientists, various religions and all
individuals in the global community should work to face the issue. Nevertheless, people of
various faiths help to relieve misery by their "liberative praxis, promoting human integral human
and cosmic development." They can step away from the issue of the secular world to the
transcendent being, yet religions do not escape from an obvious problem. People of various
faiths are life movers who work the best they can to emancipate men from poverty and
suffering, demonstrating true service to life. As a pandemic, Covid-19 has got plenty to teach us.
Javier says that: “The extent and amount of human and ecological misery shows that dialogue
is imperative as well as imperative.In this war against human and environmental misery, no
religion can possibly do it alone.” Dialogue In facing the fight against Covid-19 as one humanity
in one global culture, interreligious dialogue will unite people together to heal the world.