Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CONTENTS
Contents ......................................................................................................................... 2
Study Director Authentication Statement ...................................................................... 3
Quality Assurance Statement ......................................................................................... 4
Test Facility Management Statement............................................................................. 5
Peer Review Statement .................................................................................................. 6
Summary ........................................................................................................................ 7
Introduction .................................................................................................................... 8
Objective ........................................................................................................................ 9
Study Dates .................................................................................................................... 9
Test Item Details ............................................................................................................ 9
Test System .................................................................................................................. 10
Test Method ................................................................................................................. 11
Observations ................................................................................................................ 12
Data Evaluation ............................................................................................................ 13
Results .......................................................................................................................... 13
Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 13
References .................................................................................................................... 14
Responsible Personnel ................................................................................................. 17
Study Plan Amendment ............................................................................................... 17
Study Plan Deviation ................................................................................................... 17
Archive Statement ........................................................................................................ 17
Distribution of Reports ................................................................................................ 17
Appendix 1 ................................................................................................................... 18
- Page 2 of 18 -
This study was performed in accordance to the agreed Study Plan, One amendment
and with GLR Laboratories Pvt Ltd Standard Operating Procedures, unless otherwise
stated, and the study objective was achieved. I accept responsibility for the work and
generated data, that are scientifically acceptable and valid; and this report provides a
true and accurate record of the results obtained.
This study was performed based on the OECD Principles of Good Laboratory
Practice* ENV/MC/CHEM (98)17 (Revised 1997, issued January 1998).
*
With the exception of the identity and composition of the test item, which were the
responsibilities of the sponsor.
- Page 3 of 18 -
This study report has been reviewed by the Quality Assurance Unit of GLR
Laboratories Pvt Ltd, based on the OECD Principles of GLP, Study Plan,
Amendment, Raw Data and applicable Standard Operating Procedures.
This statement confirms that the study report accurately reflects raw data.
Date of Reporting to
Management, Study
Type of Phase(s) of Study
S. No Date of Inspection Director
Inspection Inspected
(Inspection Report
No.)
Study Based 06 August 2015
1 06 August 2015 Draft Study Plan
Inspection (SBI/161/001/001)
Study Based Definitive Study 07 August 2015
2 07 August 2015
Inspection Plan (SBI/161/001/002)
Study Based Test Item 18 August 2015
3 18 August 2015
Inspection Administration (SBI/161/001/003)
Study Based Definitive Study 15 September 2015
4 15 September 2015
Inspection Plan Amendment (SBI/161/001/004)
Study Based 30 September 2015
5 30 September 2015 Draft Report
Inspection (SBI/161/001/005)
Study Based 01 October 2015
6 01 October 2015 Final Report
Inspection (SBI/161/001/006)
- Page 4 of 18 -
This is to certify that the GLR test facility management appointed the Study Director
for this study and provided him with all necessary facilities and resources for proper
conduct of this study, both in terms of GLP and scientific integrity.
- Page 5 of 18 -
This is to certify that I have reviewed the raw data and report along with the study
director and agree with the scientific conclusions made.
- Page 6 of 18 -
SUMMARY
This study was performed to determine the acute toxicity effect of Nualgi Nano
Nutrients, when administered as a single oral dose to rats, followed by an observation
period of 14 days. A stepwise procedure using 3 female animals per step was used in
this study to assess the acute toxicity of the test item as described in the OECD
guidelines for testing of chemicals, 423. The starting dose was 300 mg/Kg body
weight. Test item was mixed with distilled water to achieve the desired concentration.
All animals received a single dose of the test item by oral route of administration after
being fasted for approximately 15 to 16 hours, but with free access to water. A dose
volume of 10 mL/Kg b.w. was used. Food was supplied approximately 3 h to 4 h after
test item administration. The results are summarised in the table below:
Number of
Step Date Dose Number of
moribund or Subsequent action
(mg/Kg) animals
dead animals
1 18 August 2015 300 3 females 0 Proceeded to Step 2
2 20 August 2015 300 3 females 0 Proceeded to Step 3
3 03 September 2015 2000 3 females 0 Proceeded to Step 4
4 07 September 2015 2000 3 females 0 Stop
No mortality and morbidity were observed in any of the animals administered with
the test item. In all the steps, animals were in somnolence condition with decreased
motor activity. None of the animals exhibit gross lesions related to test item
administration. Increase in body weight was observed in all the treated animals at the
end of the each step of the experiment. Based on the results obtained, it is concluded
that, Nualgi Nano Nutrients, falls under „Category 5 or unclassified‟ according to the
Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for the classification of chemicals. The cut off
LD50 value is greater than 5000 mg/Kg.
- Page 7 of 18 -
INTRODUCTION
Acute oral toxicity is the study of adverse effects of a chemical that result either from
a single oral exposure or from multiple exposures within 24 hours. Acute oral
toxicity provides general information on health hazards likely to arise from an acute
exposure. An acute toxicity study might be an initial step in establishing a dosage
regimen in sub acute/sub chronic and other studies and may provide information on
the mode of toxic action of a substance by the intended clinical exposure route.
The test selection and methods used in this study are based on the following
guideline:
- Page 8 of 18 -
OBJECTIVE
To determine the acute toxic potential of test item when administered by a single oral
dose to rats, followed by an observation period of 14 days.
STUDY DATES
The study completion date is the date the final report is signed by the Study Director.
This study was performed in line with agreed study plan and one amendment.
The test item for this study was Nualgi Nano Nutrients. It was received at GLR on
21 July 2015 and stored at Room temperature (20 - 30) °C.
The following test item information provided by the Sponsor, are considered an
adequate description of the characterisation, purity and stability of the test item.
Determinations of stability and characteristics of the test item were the responsibility
of the Sponsor. The test item was handled with necessary protective clothing and all
recommended safety measures were followed.
TEST SYSTEM
The test system was approved by the GLR Laboratories Pvt Ltd‟s Institutional Animal
Ethics Committee (IAEC).
- Page 10 of 18 -
ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
TEST METHOD
Volume of Concentration of
Dose Concentration Test item
Date vehicle made up dosing solution
(mg/Kg b.w.)a (mg)
to (mL) (mg/mL)b
18 August 2015 300 301.2 10.00 30.12
20 August 2015 300 301.2 10.00 30.12
03 September 2015 2000 2002.1 10.00 200.21
07 September 2015 2000 2001.4 10.00 200.14
b.w., body weight
a
All treatment doses expressed as nominal dose administered
b
All dosing preparations expressed as nominal concentrations
- Page 11 of 18 -
Test Procedure
A stepwise procedure using 3 female animals per step was used in this study to assess
the acute toxicity of the test item as described in the OECD guidelines for testing of
chemicals, number 423.
In the lack of information, a starting dose of 300 mg/Kg b.w. was selected for Step 1.
The test procedure followed the attached scheme described in Appendix 1.
All the animals received a single dose of the test item by oral route of administration,
after being fasted for approximately 15 to 16 hours, but with free access to water.
Food was supplied approximately 3 h to 4 h after test item administration.
A dose volume of 10 mL/Kg was used. Individual dose volumes are given in
Table 3. Based on the outcomes of the previous step, further steps were carried out.
OBSERVATIONS
Clinical Observation
Clinical observations were performed to look for signs of ill health or overt toxicity
during the first 30 minutes and at approximately 1, 2, 3 and 4 h after dose
administration on Day 0 and daily during days 1-14. Any abnormalities of appearance
or behaviour or other signs of reaction to treatment or ill health were recorded and a
detailed individual record was maintained of the clinical condition of each animal.
- Page 12 of 18 -
DATA EVALUATION
Based on the observations the test item were categorised as per the Globally
Harmonized Classification System and appropriate cut off LD50 range determined.
RESULTS
Clinical Observation
Clinical signs were observed in all the steps and the signs are presented in Table 1.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results obtained, it is concluded that, Nualgi Nano Nutrients, falls under
„Category 5 or unclassified‟ according to the Globally Harmonized System (GHS) for
the classification of chemicals. The cut off LD50 value is greater than 5000 mg/Kg.
- Page 13 of 18 -
REFERENCES
- Page 14 of 18 -
Table 1: Results of Mortality & Morbidity; Clinical signs and Gross pathology
Dose Animal
Steps Date Clinical Signs Mortality & Morbidity Day of Necropsy Gross Pathology
concentration No.
1 NAD
All animals were in somnolence condition with Nil
1 18 August 2015 300 mg/Kg 2 decreased motor activity following test item 01 September 2015 NAD
administration on day 0.
3 NAD
4 NAD
All animals were in somnolence condition with
2 20 August 2015 300 mg/Kg 5 decreased motor activity following test item Nil 03 September 2015 NAD
administration on day 0.
6 NAD
7 NAD
03 September 2015 All animals were in somnolence condition with
3 2000 mg/Kg 8 decreased motor activity following test item Nil 17 September 2015 NAD
administration up to day 2.
9 NAD
10 NAD
All animals were in somnolence condition with
4 07 September 2015 2000 mg/Kg 11 decreased motor activity following test item Nil 21 September 2015 NAD
administration up to day 2.
12 NAD
- Page 15 of 18 -
- Page 16 of 18 -
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL
One amendment was made to modify the test item name from “Nualgi Foliar Nano
Nutrients” to “Nualgi Nano Nutrients”.
No deviations from the study plan were found during the conduct of the study.
ARCHIVE STATEMENT
All primary data, or authenticated copies thereof, slides (if applicable), tissue
specimens (if applicable), a sample test item and the final report will be retained, for a
period of 9 years, in the GLR Laboratories Private Limited archives after issue of the
final report. At the end of the specified archive period the Sponsor will be contacted
to determine whether the data should be returned, retained or destroyed on their
behalf. Sponsors will be notified of the financial implications of each of these options
at that time.
DISTRIBUTION OF REPORTS
Two originals of the study report are prepared and distributed as mentioned below:
a. One Copy - Sponsor.
b. One Copy - Archive.
- Page 17 of 18 -
APPENDIX 1
Taken from OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, 423 (adopted on 17th
December, 2001)
- Page 18 of 18 -