This form is to be accomplished by the Supervisor/LAC Coach.

Read this guide before using LDM Forms 3AP and 3BP.

1. Download this editable form by opening the file and clicking on the down arrow icon. Do not open it as Google Sh

2. Open Form 3BP Summary of Ratings of School Heads and enter the required data in the yellow cell. Data en

3. Open Form 3AP School Head N / 3AP SH N, and enter the remaining required data in the Participant's Profile

4. Open/Get your copy of the LDM2 practicum portfolio submitted by school heads. Rate it according to the evalu
Management Team, if necessary.
5a. Input the score for each criterion by clicking the down arrow icon in the yellow cell. You may also directly ent
to white once a value has been assigned. You may add qualitative feedback in the Remarks section to substantiate

5b. To change the score, click on Delete or Backspace, then do 5a again.

6. You may navigate across the different tabs by clicking the Summary of Ratings and Guide icons or the Schoo

7. Enter the required data in the yellow cell ONLY. Do not rename the tabs.
8. Once all ratings are in, rename and save this form, then submit it to the SDO LDM Program Management Team. Coordinate
Follow this file name format: SDO Name_LDMForm3P_Instructional Coach_Last Name

This document is confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM1P evaluation forms can be divulged with anyo
authorities for purposes of evaluation, validation and certification of participation/completion.
←Guide

Form 3BP_LDM Practicum Portfolio - Summary of LDM2 Ratings of School

LDM Coach MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO
Division CAMARINES SUR
Region V
Contact Details 9099176249

PART II LDM Implementation/ Practicum Portfolio

SH Name Numerical Rating Descriptive PD Credit Units
Rating
1 MARITES A. LARDIZABAL 4.50 Oustanding Earned PD credit units will be subjecte
20 0.00 N/A
30 0.00 N/A
40 0.00 N/A
50 0.00 N/A
60 0.00 N/A
70 0.00 N/A
80 0.00 N/A
90 0.00 N/A
10 0 0.00 N/A
11 0 0.00 N/A
12 0 0.00 N/A
13 0 0.00 N/A
14 0 0.00 N/A
15 0 0.00 N/A
DM2 Ratings of School LAC Leaders
←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader: MARITES A. LARDIZABAL
School: SIBOBO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Email Address: marites.lardizabal@deped.gov.ph
Contact Number: 94847481094
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Repor
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
5 4
The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLE
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Weighted Rating 1.500 1.000

Final Rating (FR) 4.500

Description of FR Oustanding
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description:
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
Part II Rating Description:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
4 5
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear

indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate The ideas are expressed using

the 2 indicators of relevant strands very basic words and structure
in professional standards with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions

The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.800 0.750
s (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined
N/A
4.500 to be determined
Oustanding

Organization of Portfolio Timeliness

5% 5%
4 5
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful, and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

The portfolio is logically organized. The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on

organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
placed in the overall organization

The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
logical order than 3 days after the deadline
0.200 0.250
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings
←Guide
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of
Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000
 ←Summary of Ratings
Form 3AP_LDM2 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School LAC Leader:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent The outputs clearly and
adequately captured the progress
of the provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers
and, showing innovations that
contribute to effective facilitation of
learning
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs adequately captured
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the provision of
technical assistance on instruction
in the modalities provided to
teachers.
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
provision of technical assistance
on instruction in the modalities
provided to teachers.
Division:
Region:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance/coaching,
shows in-depth analysis and
synthesis, and excellently relates it
to the professional standards and
to professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance and relates
them to the professional standards
and personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in the provision of
technical assistance with limited
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of provision of technical
assistance on instruction in the
modalities provided to teachers.
Reflection describes experience in
the provision of technical
assistance with no attempt to
relate it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals

Weighted Rating 0.000 0.000

Final Rating (FR) 0.000

Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
Individual Report of LDM2 Rating of School LAC Leaders (MTs, HTs, Senior Teachers)
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CAMARINES SUR Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
V Part I Rating Description: N/A
MA.CECILIA C. BARNEDO Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio) 0.000
Part II Rating Description: N/A

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall Organization of Portfolio
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15% 5%

The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful, and offers new
perspective and insights

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear The portfolio is logically organized.
indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but The portfolio is generally well-
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas organized with 1-2 items not well
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or placed in the overall organization
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult The portfolio does not follow a
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure logical order
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.000 0.000 0.000

Teachers)
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline
The output/s is/are submitted more
than 3 days after the deadline

0.000