This form is to be accomplished by the LDM 1 LAC leader.

Read this guide before using LDM1 Forms 1AP and 1BP.

1. Download this editable form by opening the file and clicking on the down arrow icon. Do not open it as Google

2. Open Form 1BP Summary of Ratings of School Heads and enter the required data in the yellow cell. Data

3. Open Form 1AP School Head N / 1AP SH N, and enter the remaining required data in the Participant's Pro

4. Open/Get your copy of the LDM1 practicum portfolio submitted by school heads. Rate it according to the ev
Management Team, if necessary.
5a. Input the score for each criterion by clicking the down arrow icon in the yellow cell. You may also directly
to white once a value has been assigned. You may add qualitative feedback in the Remarks section to substant

5b. To change the score, click on Delete or Backspace, then do 5a again.

6. You may navigate across the different tabs by clicking the Summary of Ratings and Guide icons or the Sc

7. Enter the required data in the yellow cell ONLY. Do not rename the tabs.
8. Once all ratings are in, rename and save this form, then submit it to the SDO LDM Program Management Team. Coordin
Follow this file name format: SDO Name_LDM Form1P_LAC Leader 1_Last Name

This document is confidential. NO ENTRY in the LDM Form 1P can be divulged with anyone exce
purposes of evaluation, validation and certification of participation/completion.
←Guide

Form 1BP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Summary of LDM1 Ratings of School H

LAC Leader SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
Division CEBU PROVINCE
Region VII
Contact Details shellamae.concha@deped.gov.ph
LDM Coach

PART II LDM Implementation/ Practicum Portfolio

SH Name Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating

1 OLGRETHIL L. CAMONGAY 4.20 Very Satisfactory

2 0 0.00 N/A
3 0 0.00 N/A
4 0 0.00 N/A
5 0 0.00 N/A
6 0 0.00 N/A
7 0 0.00 N/A
8 0 0.00 N/A
9 0 0.00 N/A
10 0 0.00 N/A
11 0 0.00 N/A
12 0 0.00 N/A
13 0 0.00 N/A
14 0 0.00 N/A
15 0 0.00 N/A
LDM1 Ratings of School Heads

/ Practicum Portfolio
PD Credit Units

Earned PD credit units will be subjected to the PD credit units banking mechanism of DepEd NEAP as stated in DO 20, s.2020
 Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Repor
←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head: OLGRETHIL L. CAMONGAY
School: KAORASAN PRIMARY SCHOOL
Email Address: olgrethil.camongay@deped.gov.ph
Contact Number: 9686128628
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
Partial Rating
4 5
5 - Excellent The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
4 - Very Satisfactory The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
3 - Satisfactory The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
2 - Marginal The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
1 - Unsatisfactory The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
Weighted Rating 1.200
Final Rating (FR) 4.200
Description of FR Very Satisfactory
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLE
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
1.250
 Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads

PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
CEBU PROVINCE Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
VII Part I Rating Description:
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
0 Part II Rating Description:

PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO

Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20% 15%
4 4
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5 The ideas are expressed in clear,
or more indicators of relevant coherent, and appropriately-
strands in professional standards worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 4 The ideas are expressed in clear

indicators of relevant strands in language with very minimal errors
professional standards in structure and/or writing
conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate 3 The ideas are expressed well but
indicators of relevant strands in with incoherence in some areas
professional standards and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions

The outputs clearly demonstrate The ideas are expressed using

the 2 indicators of relevant strands very basic words and structure
in professional standards with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions

The outputs do not demonstrate The ideas are jumbled and difficult
any indicator in the professional to understand; errors in structure
standards and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output

0.800 0.600
 PD Credit Units
to be determined
N/A
4.200 to be determined
Very Satisfactory

0
Organization of Portfolio Timeliness

5% 5%
4 3
The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted more
is insightful and offers new than 3 days ahead of the deadline
perspective and insights

The portfolio is logically organized, The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

is insightful and offers new days before the deadline
perspective and insights

The portfolio is generally well- The output/s is/are submitted on

organized with 1-2 items not well the deadline
placed in the overall organization

The portfolio has 3-4 items not The output/s is/are submitted 1-3
well placed in the overall days after the deadline
organization

The portfolio does not follow a The output/s is/are submitted more
logical order than 3 days after the deadline

0.200 0.150

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000

←Summary of Ratings
←Guide
PARTICIPANT'S PROFILE
School Head:
School:
Email Address:
Contact Number:
Partial Rating
5 - Excellent
4 - Very Satisfactory
3 - Satisfactory
2 - Marginal
1 - Unsatisfactory
Weighted Rating
Final Rating (FR)
Form 1AP_LDM1 Practicum Portfolio - Individual Report o
Demonstration of Progress
of LDM Implementation
30%
The outputs captured clearly and
adequately the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
showing innovations that
contribute to the smooth
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs captured adequately
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a big extent
the progress of the implementation
of the LDMs
The outputs reflect to a limited
extent the progress of the
implementation of the LDMs
The outputs do not show the
progress of the implementation of
the LDMs
0.000
0.000
Division:
Region:
LAC Leader:
LDM Coach:
PART II - LDM IMPLEME
Quality of Reflection
25%
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows depth of
analysis and synthesis, and
relates it to the professional
standards and to professional and
personal development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM
implementation, shows some
analysis, and relates it to the
professional standards and to
professional and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
and relates it to the professional
standards and personal
development goals
Reflection describes the
experience in LDM implementation
with limited attempt to relate it to
the professional standards and
personal development goals
Reflection describes experience in
LDM implementation with no
attempt to relate it to the
professional standards and
personal development goals
0.000
Description of FR N/A
Remarks Type feedback here.
(Optional)

Descriptive Rating
4.50 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.50 - 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.50 - 3.499 Satisfactory
1.50 - 2.499 Unsatisfactory
1.00 - 1.499 Poor
recog indicators hit 94
total recog indicators 112
PPSH indicators 16
#ERROR!
credit units 13.4285714285714
ndividual Report of LDM1 Rating of School Heads
CEBU PROVINCE
VII
SHELLA MAE A. CONCHA
0 Part II Rating Description:
PART II - LDM IMPLEMENTATION / PRACTICUM PORTFOLIO
Demonstration of Language and Overall
Professional Standards Presentation of the Output
20%
The outputs clearly demonstrate 5
or more indicators of relevant
strands in professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 4
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate 3
indicators of relevant strands in
professional standards
The outputs clearly demonstrate
the 2 indicators of relevant strands
in professional standards
The outputs do not demonstrate
any indicator in the professional
standards
0.000
PARTICIPANT'S PERFORMANCE
Part I Rating (Module-based Outputs)
Part I Rating Description:
Part II Rating (Practicum Portfolio)
15%
The ideas are expressed in clear,
coherent, and appropriately-
worded language with no errors in
structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed in clear
language with very minimal errors
in structure and/or writing
conventions
The ideas are expressed well but
with incoherence in some areas
and few errors in structure and/or
writing conventions
The ideas are expressed using
very basic words and structure
with incoherence in many areas
and several errors in structure
and/or writing conventions
The ideas are jumbled and difficult
to understand; errors in structure
and writing conventions are almost
everywhere in the output
0.000
N/A
0.000
N/A
Organization of Portfolio
5%
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is logically organized,
is insightful and offers new
perspective and insights
The portfolio is generally well-
organized with 1-2 items not well
placed in the overall organization
The portfolio has 3-4 items not
well placed in the overall
organization
The portfolio does not follow a
logical order
0.000
PD Credit Units
to be determined

to be determined

0
Timeliness

5%

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days ahead of the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-2

days before the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted on

the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted 1-3

days after the deadline

The output/s is/are submitted more

than 3 days after the deadline

0.000