Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter - 19
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003
The Electricity Act, 2003 (hereinafter referred as the "Act") is the latest
comprehensive enactment which has been passed to deal with various
matters relating to generation, transmission, distribution, trading and use of
electricity. The Act aims at taking measures conducive to the development
of electricity industry, through promotion of competition and protection of
the interests of consumers in terms of supply and rationalization of tariff.
Adoption of transparent policies regarding subsidies, promotion of efficient
and environmentally benign policies, constitution of a Central Electricity
Authority, framing of regulatory commissions and the establishment of an
Appellate Tribunal constitute the basic policies of the Act.
Earlier, there were three enactments, the Indian Electricity Act, 1910,
the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 and the Electricity R e g u l a t o r y
Commission Act, 1998, in force to regulate the generation and supply of
electricity. The Indian Electricity Act, 1910 had e m p o w e r e d the
government to grant licences to private undertakings for generation and
supply of electricity on certain terms and conditions, enabling the licence
holders to construct works and lay supply lines. It had also made provisions
for imposition of duties and for fair and non-discriminationary treatment of
consumers. The licensees under that Act had a subordinate character. In
1948, the overall responsibility for management and administration of
electricity in the states was given to state boards created under the
Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 to fix tariff for supply of electricity to
consumers and other terms and conditions on which the supply was to be
made. The state governments could grant licence to any person after
consulting the concerned board. The licensee could, however, change rates
of supply to the consumers without obtaining the sanction of the state
government. A licensee could disconnect the supply to a consumer if he
failed to pay charges, after giving him at least seven days' clear notice before
disconnecting the supply.
Over a period of time, the performance of state electricity boards had
deteriorated and they had been found unable to take decisions on tariffs in
a professional and independent manner. The task of determining tariff in
practice was being performed by the state governments. To address this
issue, the Electricity Regulatory Commissions Act, 1998 was passed to
constitute state electricity regulatory commissions, which were empowered
to fix tariffs independently of the government.
THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 289
1. The Electricity Act, 2003, sec. 2(8). "Captive Generating Plant" means a power plant
set-up by any person to generate electricity primarily for his own use and includes a
power plant set-up by any co-operative society or association of persons for
generating electricity primarily for use of members of such co-operative society or
association.
290 A TREATISE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS
with electricity for his own use by a licensee or the government or by any
other person engaged in the business of supplying electricity to the public. It
also includes any person whose premises have been connected for the
purpose of receiving electricity with the works of a licensee, the government
or such other person engaged in the business of supplying electricity.
Recovery of charges
In case a consumer neglects to pay any sum due from him to a licensee or a
generating company in respect of supply, transmission, distribution or
been deemed to be appointed and continue to hold office on the same terms
and conditions on which they were appointed under the Act of 1948.37 The
Authority is to consist of not more than fourteen members (including its
chairperson) of whom not more than eight are to be full time members to
be appointed by the central government. 38 Functions of the Authority are:
(a) to advise the central government on matters relating to national
electricity policy;
(b) formulate short-term and perspective plan for development of
electricity system;
(c) coordinate the activities of the planning agencies for the optimal
utilization of resources to sub-serve the interests of the national
economy; and
(d) to provide reliable and affordable electricity for all consumers.
It is also required to provide the technical specifications and safety
standards for construction of electrical plants and electrical lines, the
conditions for installation of meters, the grid standards for operation and
maintenance of transmission lines. The Authority is empowered to advise
state governments, licensees or the generating companies on those matters
which would enable them to operate and maintain the electricity system in
an i m p r o v e d m a n n e r . It has general power of advising the central
government and regulatory commissions on all technical matters relating to
generation, transmission and distribution of electricity.39
electricity, if necessary.
The state commission is also required to advise the state government on
the following matters:
(a) promotion of competition, efficiency and economy in activities
of the electricity industry;
(b) promotion of investment in electricity;
(c) recognition and restructuring of electricity industry in the state;
(d) matters concerning generation, transmission, distribution and
trading of electricity; and
(e) such other matters as may be referred to the state commission by
that government. 57
While exercising its powers and discharging its functions, the state
commission has to ensure transparency and follow the national electricity
policy, national electricity plan and tariff policy.58
Tribunal for Electricity to hear appeals against the orders of the adjudicatory
officer or the appropriate commission under this Act. 6 2 Any person
aggrieved by an order made by the adjudicatory officer or by the appropriate
commission can prefer an appeal to the Appellate Tribunal. 63 Appeal can be
filed within a period of forty-five days from the date on which a copy of the
order made by the adjudicatory officer or the appropriate commission is
received by the aggrieved person.64 The appellate tribunal may entertain an
appeal after the expiry of forty-five days, if he is satisfied that there was
sufficient cause for not filing it within that period. 65
The other party would have to be given an opportunity to present its
defence. The Tribunal may confirm, modify or set aside the order appealed
against. 66 A copy of each order would be sent to the parties and to the
concerned adjudicating officer or the appropriate commission by the
Tribunal. 67 Appeals would have to be dealt with as expeditiously as possible
and endeavour would have to be made to dispose of the appeals finally
within one hundred and eighty days from the date of filing of the appeal.68
Where any appeal could not be disposed of within the stipulated period, the
Tribunal has to record its reason in writing for not disposing of the appeal
in time. 69 The Appellate Tribunal is authorized to examine the legality,
propriety or correctness of any order made by the adjudicating officer or the
appropriate commission. It may call for the records of the proceedings on
its own motion or otherwise, and make necessary orders. 70
The Act further provides that any person aggrieved by the decision or
order of the Appellate Tribunal can file an appeal to the Supreme Court
within sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order
of the Appellate Tribunal. 71
Chapter - 20
THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002
The Competition Act, 2002 (hereinafter referred as the "Act") is one of the
most important legislations passed in India to regulate the new economic
regime characterised by privatisation, liberalisation and competition. The
Act has replaced the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practice (MRTP)
Act, 1969 which had been enacted to prevent concentration of economic
power to the common detriment. The Act contained certain provisions for
prevention of unfair trade practices, impacting consumer interests. A
Commission, namely, the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices
Commission had also been established to enforce the policies of the Act. In
place of this Commission now another Commission, called the Competition
Commission of India has been established to prevent practices having
adverse effect on competition and to protect the interest of consumers.
1. Report of the High Powered Expert Committee on Companies and MRTP Act, 262-263
(1978).
THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002 305
2. The Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969, sec. 36A(1).
3. Ibid.
4. Id., Explanation to sec. 36A(1).
306 A TREATISE ON CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS
the beneficiaries of services who use or avail them with the approval of the
first purchaser or the hirer. It is immaterial that such purchase of goods or
hiring or availing of services was for resale or any commercial purpose or for
personal use.
Regulation of combinations
Sections 5 and 6 of the Competition Act make provisions for regulation of
combinations or cartels to prevent anti-competition operations and anti-
c o n s u m e r policies. The combination means further acquisition of
enterprises by a person or enterprise in similar trade or business and
mergers, amalgamations, joint ventures, or taking over of friendly or hostile
enterprises. This is a kind of monopolisation of trade or supply. According
to section 5 the acquisition of one or more enterprises by one or more
persons or acquiring of control or merger or amalgamation of enterprises"
adverse to competition should be construed as combination.
Section 6 of the Act, dealing with the matter, prohibits any person or
enterprise from entering into combinations which may cause an appreciable
adverse effect on competition within the relevant market and declares them
void. 25 By implications, combinations are permissible if they cause no
appreciable adverse effect on competition. However, any person or
enterprise that proposes to enter into a combination should give to the
Competition Commission a notice disclosing the details of the proposed
combination. The notice should be given within seven days of approval of
the proposal relating to merger or amalgamation by the board of directors of
the enterprises concerned. Similarly, notice shall be given on the execution
of any agreement or other document for acquisition or acquiring of control
over an enterprise. 26
After receiving the notice, the Commission has to make investigations
into the combination as to its effect on competition and conduct enquiries
about the disclosures made in the notice and issue orders accordingly, in
favour or against combination. 27 These regulatory provisions do not apply
to share subscription or financing or any acquisition by a public financial
institution investor 28 or bank or venture capital fund, 29 pursuant to any
covenant of a loan agreement or investment agreement. 3 0 Any such
institution should file, within seven days from the date of the acquisition,
with the Commission the details of the acquisition including the details of
c o n t r o l , the circumstances for exercise of such c o n t r o l and the
consequences of default arising out of such loan agreement or investment
agreement, as the case may be. 31 Obviously, all these requirements have
been prescribed to check malaflde combinations and protection of the
interests of the consumers.
Composition
The Act, as mentioned above, provides for the establishment of the
Competition Commission of India to control practices adverse to the
promotion and sustenance of competition in India.32 The Commission is to
consist of a chairperson and two to ten members, as may be specified by the
central government. 33 The chairperson and every other member should be
a person of ability, integrity and standing, having been or is qualified to be
the judge of a high court or having special knowledge and professional
experience of at least fifteen years in international trade, economics,
business, commerce, law, finance, accountancy, management, industry,
public affairs, administration or in any other matter useful to the
Commission. 34
The chairperson and other members can be appointed for five years and
may be eligible for reappointment. 35 The chairperson may hold office up to
the age of sixty seven years and a member can hold office only up to the age
of sixty five years. In the event of any vacancy in the office of the
chairperson, the senior most member can discharge the functions of the
chairperson. 36
T o assist the Commission in the discharge of its functions and
performance of duties, the Act provides for the appointment of a director
general and additional, joint, deputy and assistant directors and advisors,
c o n s u l t a n t s or officers. 3 7 Like the chairperson and members of the
Commission, they should also be persons with integrity and outstanding
ability, having experience in investigation and knowledge of accountancy,
management, business, public administration, international trade, law or
economics. 38
(f) language;
(g) consumer references; and
(h) need for secure or regular supplies or rapid after-sales services.48
While determining the "relevant product market", 49 the Commission
should give due consideration to:
(a) physical characteristics or end-use of goods;
(b) price of goods or service;
(c) consumer preferences;
(d) exclusion of in-house production;
(e) existence of specialised producers; and
(f) classification of industrial products. 50
Beside inquiring into contravention of the provisions of the Act about
p r o h i b i t e d agreements having adverse effect on c o m p e t i t i o n , the
Commission is empowered to make inquiry as to whether a particular
combination causes or is likely to cause an appreciable adverse effect on
competition in India. If such an inquiry is conducted by the Commission suo
motu, upon its own knowledge or information, it should be started within
one year from the date when such contravening combination takes place.
Further, the Act specifies the factors which the Commission should take
into account for determining whether the combination has appreciable
adverse effect on the competition in the relevant market. These factors
are:51
(a) actual and potential level of competition through imports in the
market;
(b) extent of barriers to entry into the market;
(c) level of combination in the market;
(d) degree of countervailing power in the market;
(e) likelihood that the combination would result in increase in prices
or profit margins;
(f) extent of effective competition likely to sustain in a market;
(g) extent to which substitutes are available or are likely to be
available in the market;
52. The statutory authority includes any authority, board, corporation, council, institute,
university or any other body corporate.
53. Id., sec. 21(1).
54. Id., sec. 21(2).
55. Id., sec. 22(2).
56. Id., sec. 22(3).
57. Id., sec. 22(4).
58. Id., sec. 22(5).
316 A TREATISE O N CONSUMER PROTECTION LAWS
time period allowed for the purpose. 67 In case the Commission is of the
opinion that no prima facie case is existing, the complaint should be dismissed
and necessary orders, including imposition of costs, if any are to be
passed.68 On receipt of the report of the Director-General, the Commission
has to forward a copy of the report to the parties concerned or to the
central government or the state government as the case may be. 69 In case
the report recommends that there is no contravention of the provisions of
the Act, the complainant will be given an opportunity to rebut the findings
of the Director General.70 If after hearing the complainant, the Commission
agrees with the recommendations of the Director-General, the Commission
can dismiss the complaint. 7 1 In case the Commission, after hearing the
complainant, is of the opinion that further inquiry is required to be
conducted, it will direct the complainant to proceed with the complaint.72 If
the report relating to a reference recommends that there is contravention of
any of the provisions of the Act, the Commission will invite the comments
from the central government or the state government or the statutory
authority, as the case may be, and it will return reference if there is no prima
facie case or the Commission may proceed with the reference as a complaint
if there is a prima facie case.73
Section 27 of the Act specifies the actions which the Commission is
competent to take after an inquiry. If on inquiry, the Commission finds that
any agreement or action by an enterprise in a dominant position is in
contravention of the provision of the Act on anti-competitive agreements
and abuse of dominant position, it may order the enterprise or person
involved to discontinue the abuse and not to re-enter into any such
agreement. 74 It may also impose on any contravening person or enterprise
such penalty for such an action as it may deem fit. The penalty should not
be more than ten per cent of the average of the turnover of the enterprise
for the last three preceding years. If the agreement involved in the case has
been entered into by any cartel, the Commission shall impose upon each
producer, seller, distributor, trader or service provider included in that
cartel, a penalty equivalent to three times of the amount of profits made out
of such agreement by the cartel or ten per cent of the average of the
turnover as stated above. 75
other documents in the custody or under the control of that person 84 and
to furnish any other information relating to trade which may be in his
possession. 85 The Commission is also empowered to conduct inquiry or
adjudicate matters after giving oral hearing to the parties concerned. 86
Review of orders is allowed by the Commission. Any person aggrieved
by an order of the Commission, from which an appeal is allowed by this Act
but no appeal has been preferred, may apply to the Commission within
thirty days from the date of the order for review of its order and the
Commission may make any appropriate order thereon. However, the
Commission may entertain a review application after the expiry of the
period of thirty days, if it is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by
sufficient cause from preferring the appeal in time. Further, no order can be
modified or set aside without giving an opportunity of being heard to the
person about whom the order has been issued and the Director-General
where he was a party to the proceedings.87
From the decisions and orders of the Commission, appeal can lie before
the Supreme Court. If any person is aggrieved by any decision or order of
the Commission, he may file an appeal before the Supreme Court within
sixty days from the date of communication of the decision or order to him
on one or more grounds arising out of such decision or order. However, in
case of delay in filing appeal, the Supreme Court, may allow filing of appeal
within a further period not exceeding sixty days if the appellant can satisfy
the court that he was prevented by sufficient cause from filing the appeal
within the given time. 88 However, no appeal can lie against any decision or
order of the Commission made with the consent of the parties.
V. Penalties
If any person contravenes without any reasonable ground any order of the
Commission, he shall be liable to be detained in civil prison for a term
which may extend to one year or may be charged with a penalty not
exceeding rupees ten lakhs. 8 9 Same punishment would be imposed for
contraventions of any condition or restriction subject to which any
approval, sanction, direction or exemption in relation to any matter had
been accorded. 90 Any person who has failed to pay any penalty imposed
under the Act would also be charged with the same punishment. 91
The Act also provides for imposition of penalty for failure of any
person to comply with the directions of the Commission or the Director-
General about production of any books, account or documents required by
the Commission or the Director-General. In this respect, the Commission
may impose a penalty of rupees one lakh for each day during which the
person concerned has failed to comply with the said directions by the
Commission or the Director-General. 92
Penalty has also been provided for making fake statements or omissions
to furnish material information by any person being a p a r t y to a
combination. Such penalty will not be less than rupees fifty lakh but it may
extend up to rupees one crore.93 A penalty, extending up to rupees ten lakh,
can be imposed upon a person who furnishes any false statement or
document or fails to state any material fact, about matters other than
c o m b i n a t i o n , which he might have been required t o furnish. Same
punishment can be imposed about altering, suppressing or destroying any
document of that kind. The Commission can also pass such other orders as
it may deem fit in a particular case.94
From the scheme of the Competition Act, it can be inferred that this
has been enacted mainly for the regulation of trade and promotion of
competition in market. It has a direct bearing on the interest of consumers,
availability of quality products in sufficient quantities at reasonable prices
and efficient services from multiple service providers. Therefore, any kind of
manipulation by business houses affecting quality or supply of goods or
services in the form of mutual agreements, mergers or combinations or
abuse of dominant position needs to be stopped with a heavy hand. Main
responsibility lies on the Competition Commission established under the
Act. Implementation of the policies of the Act and goals to be achieved
thereunder lie with this important institution. Its efficient working can go a
long way in controlling the practices having adverse effect on competition.
Common masses should be educated through media about the significance
of the Commission and its role without delay, to make it effective, without
which the Commission may, in due course of time, get confined to routine
paper work.
The Act makes express provisions related to competition advocacy. This
is a very ambitious feature of the Act. The Commission should take suitable
measure for the promotion of competition advocacy creating awareness and
imparting training about the competition issues as may be prescribed.95 The
opinions given by the Commission framing the competition policy may not