Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subject Outline: Healthcare Sciences
Subject Outline: Healthcare Sciences
Healthcare Sciences
Subject Outline
Subject Name Psychological Research Methods and Interpretation
We acknowledge the Traditional Owners of the lands and waters where our University is
located and actively seek to contribute and support the JCU Reconciliation Statement,
which exemplifies respect for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait cultures, heritage,
knowledge and the valuing of justice and equity for all Australians.
This publication is covered by copyright regulations. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of
private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be
reproduced by any process or placed in computer memory without written permission.
Page 1 of 17
Pre-requisites
For prerequisites, see https://secure.jcu.edu.au/app/studyfinder/?subject=PY3101&year=2020
Q1. This subject is offered across more than one campus and/or mode Yes ☒ No ☐
and/or teaching period within the one calendar year.
Q2. If Yes (Q1), the design of all offerings of this subject ensure the same Yes ☒ No ☐
learning outcomes and assessment types and weightings.
Q3. If no (Q2), the Academic Head has authorised any variations, in terms of equivalence.
College of Healthcare Sciences Disclaimer: The information provided in this subject outline is correct as at the
time of completion and may change in response to changing University resources. Any changes will be approved
by the College Dean or representative and will be communicated to students by the LearnJCU subject site.
Tuesday and
Subject
Nerina Caltabiano A4.237 42321182 nerina.caltabiano@jcu.edu.au Thursday 2 –
Coordinator
4pm
Online: Thurs 9
Lecturer Kai Qin Chan C3-07 67093934 kaiqin.chan@jcu.edu.au
am – 1 pm
For further assistance please refer to Student Assistance Directory (Psychology) – Who Do I Contact?
Page 2 of 17
Contents
1 Subject at a glance ................................................................................................................................. 4
1.1 Student participation requirements ................................................................................................... 4
1.2 Key dates ........................................................................................................................................... 4
2 Subject details ........................................................................................................................................ 5
2.1 Subject description ............................................................................................................................ 5
2.2 Subject learning outcomes ................................................................................................................. 5
2.3 Learning and teaching in this subject.................................................................................................. 5
2.4 Student feedback on subject and teaching ......................................................................................... 5
2.5 Subject resources and special requirements....................................................................................... 6
3 Assessment details................................................................................................................................ 7
3.1 Requirements for successful completion of subject ............................................................................ 7
3.2 Feedback on student learning ............................................................................................................ 7
3.3 Assessment tasks ............................................................................................................................... 8
4 Submission and return of assessment.......................................................................................... 14
4.1 Submission of assessment................................................................................................................ 14
4.2 Return of assessment ....................................................................................................................... 14
5 Subject calendar ................................................................................................................................. 15
Page 3 of 17
1 Subject at a glance
1.1 Student participation requirements
The JCU Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy (4.3) indicates that, “a 3 credit point subject will require a 130
hour work load of study-related participation including class attendance over the duration of the study period,
irrespective of mode of delivery”. This work load comprises timetabled hours and other attendance
requirements, as well as personal study hours, including completion of online learning activities and assessment
requirements. Note that “attendance at specified classes will be a mandatory requirement for satisfactory
completion of some subjects” (Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy, 5.10); and that additional hours may be
required per week for those students in need of English language, numeracy or other learning support.
Last date to withdraw without academic penalty See 2020 Study Period and Census Dates
Assessment task 1: Group Questionnaire Design and Analysis [15%] 21 Dec 2020, 2359 hrs
Page 4 of 17
2 Subject details
2.1 Subject description
This subject covers research designs that are non-experimental or quasi-experimental in nature. These include
methods that are often more appropriate for research in field settings where experiments are neither practical
nor sensible. The different types of validity and the benefits and limitations of weighing one type of validity
against another will be considered. In addition, some of the most popular and powerful multivariate statistical
techniques will also be introduced in lectures and practicals. The statistical material will cover multiple and
logistic regression, factor analysis, discriminant analysis and multi dimensional scaling analysis. The emphasis will
be on the conceptual understanding and use of these techniques rather than mathematical arguments and
proofs. Practicals will focus on everyday applications of the knowledge you gain from your study of research
design.
These outcomes will contribute to your overall achievement of course learning outcomes. Your course learning
outcomes can be located in the entry for your course in the electronic JCU Course and Subject Handbook 2020
(click on ‘Course Information’ bar/ select ‘Undergraduate Courses’ or ‘Postgraduate Courses’/ select relevant
course/ scroll down to ‘Academic Requirements for Course Completion’, ‘Course learning outcomes’).
LearnJCU will contain the PowerPoint slides for each of the topics covered in the lectures. The weekly practicals,
along with the respective data sets are also on the LearnJCU site. As a core subject for entry into fourth year, this
subject will be invaluable in helping you design and analyse your fourth-year research projects.
Page 5 of 17
and areas that may need refinement or change. YourJCU Subject and Teaching Surveys provide a formal and
confidential method for you to provide feedback about your subjects and the staff members teaching within
them. These surveys are available to all students through LearnJCU. You will receive an email invitation when the
survey opens. We value your feedback and ask that you provide constructive feedback about your learning
experiences for each of your subjects, in accordance with responsibilities outlined in the Student Code of
Conduct. Refrain from providing personal feedback on topics that do not affect your learning experiences.
Malicious comments about staff are deemed unacceptable by the University.
In response to previous student feedback and other data, the following enhancements to this subject have been
made:
• More guidance (in the form of FAQ documents) will be provided for A1 and A2.
Additionally, you can find the most appropriate library subject resources, including dedicated discipline-specific
Library Guides, relevant databases and access to library services and staff through the Your Library tool, in your
LearnJCU subject site.
Prescribed Texts
1. Research Methods in Psychology (2017) by Price and colleagues.
NOTE: This is a free online e-book that gives an excellent modern overview of research methods in
psychology. The direct link is here: https://opentext.wsu.edu/carriecuttler/
2. Allen, P., Bennett, K., Heritage, B. (2019). SPSS Statistics: A practical guide. (4th Ed.). Melbourne: Cengage.
Recommended Reading
3. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual. (6th Ed.). Allen & Unwin.
4. Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (5th Ed.). London: Sage.
Reference Material:
For presentation of assignments you should consult the official style manual or one of the following texts:
• Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. (7th edition). Washington: American
Psychological Association.
Page 6 of 17
3 Assessment details
3.1 Requirements for successful completion of subject
In order to pass this subject, you must:
Assessment items and final grades will be reviewed through moderation processes (Learning, Teaching and
Assessment Policy, 5.13-5.18). It is important to be aware that assessment “is always subject to final ratification
following the examination period and that no single result represents a final grade in a subject” (Learning,
Teaching and Assessment Policy, 5.22.).
Grades will be awarded for all coursework subjects as per the JCU Student Results Policy.
Inherent requirements are the fundamental abilities, attributes, skills and behaviours needed to achieve the
learning outcomes of a course while preserving the academic integrity of the university’s learning, assessment
and accreditation processes. Students and prospective students must be able to demonstrate that they have
acquired or have the ability to acquire the inherent requirements for their degree.
Reasonable adjustments may be made to assist students manage additional circumstances impacting on their
studies provided these do not change the academic integrity of a degree. Reasonable adjustments do not alter
the need to be able to demonstrate the inherent requirements of the course. Students who believe they will
experience challenges completing their degree or course because of their disability, health condition or other
reason should discuss their concerns with an AccessAbility Services team member or a member of College staff,
such as the Course Coordinator. In the case where it is determined that inherent requirements cannot be met
with reasonable adjustments, the University staff can provide guidance regarding other study options.
Page 7 of 17
3.3 Assessment tasks
ASSESSMENT TASK 1: QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN & ANALYSIS
• apply the methods of scientific research to answer questions and solve problems in
field settings
Aligned subject learning
• recognise the strengths and limitations of these methodologies
outcomes
• produce a research proposal paying particular attention to the design and analysis
components of the proposed study
Aligned professional
Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Standards
standards / competencies
Weighting 15%
One of the most common research approaches is to simply ask your subjects questions related to your research
hypothesis; in other words, to use a questionnaire. One of the major difficulties with questionnaire research is
that the quality of the data is directly related to the reliability and validity of the actual questions asked. Slight
changes in wording can have a dramatic impact on the results obtained. The purpose of this assessment is to give
you experience of constructing a questionnaire and for you to present, the reliability and validity issues you need
to consider when constructing the questionnaire. The research topic that the questionnaire will be focussed on
will be discussed in your lectures and tutorials. Students work in small groups to design a short questionnaire
(potentially online) of no more than 20 items, administer it to each other, and analyse it for internal consistency
and test-retest reliability. You are then asked to submit the questionnaire and a short assignment (circa 1000
words) outlining (1) some background literature, (2) the rationale for the questions, (3) how you have ensured the
questionnaire has validity and (4) whether the questionnaire has reliability.
HD - 85%+ Outstanding work showing sophisticated understanding, critical synthesis, originality, and/or insight
with regard to the field of knowledge, and taking into consideration the level of the subject.
D - 75%+ Substantial work of high quality. Sophisticated understanding, but without the spark of originality,
synthesizing powers or insight of the HD grade.
C - 65%+ Sound, competent work, demonstrating a reasonable grasp of knowledge in the area, taking into
account subject and level.
P - 50%+ Adequate engagement with the field at a general level to justify proceeding to further coursework
study in the area.
N - < 50% Work which fails to demonstrate a satisfactory grasp of the field either through poor research,
incoherence or lack of literacy.
Page 8 of 17
ASSESSMENT 1 (QUESTIONNAIRE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS) MARKING CRITERIA
Marks
8.5 - 10 7.5 - 8.4 6.5 - 7.4 5.0 - 6.4 < 5.0
Category
Quality of Excellently Well-phrased Reasonably Questions do not Poor
constructed items phrased items, all items that mostly phrased items quite address the formulation
(25%) of which address address the that often research items of items
the research research question address the
question research question
Quality of review Excellent review Good review that Reasonable Review vaguely Unclear
(30%) that showcases a showcases a review that justifies why this justification
unique niche for unique niche for showcases a this questionnaire on why this
this questionnaire this questionnaire potential niche is needed questionnaire
for this is needed
questionnaire
Quality of Excellent Good Reasonable Vague Very little
psychometric consideration of consideration of consideration of consideration of consideration
considerations reliability and reliability and reliability and reliability and of reliability
(35%) validity issues validity issues validity issues validity issues and validity
issues
Appearance Consistently Mostly Somewhat Rarely Neither
(10%) professional and professional professional professional professional
clear and/or clear and/or clear and/or clear nor clear
Page 9 of 17
ASSESSMENT TASK 2: RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Aligned professional
Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Standards
standards / competencies
Weighting 25%
The major assessment item for PY3101 is a research proposal. The research area for the proposal is your choice
but it should reflect your advanced understanding of methodology and statistics, and something that you could
realistically carry out for a fourth-year piece of research. There is no need to submit the full JCU ethics form, but
you must submit the Information Sheet and Informed Consent form along with your proposal. Guidelines for the
proposal will appear on LearnJCU. The maximum word length is 2000 words.
HD - 85%+ Outstanding work showing sophisticated understanding, critical synthesis, originality, and/or insight
with regard to the field of knowledge, and taking into consideration the level of the subject.
D - 75%+ Substantial work of high quality. Sophisticated understanding, but without the spark of originality,
synthesizing powers or insight of the HD grade.
C - 65%+ Sound, competent work, demonstrating a reasonable grasp of knowledge in the area, taking into
account subject and level.
P - 50%+ Adequate engagement with the field at a general level to justify proceeding to further coursework
study in the area.
N - <50% Work which fails to demonstrate a satisfactory grasp of the field either through poor research,
incoherence or lack of literacy.
Page 10 of 17
ASSESSMENT 2 (RESEARCH PROPOSAL) MARKING CRITERIA
Marks
8.5 - 10 7.5 - 8.4 6.5 - 7.4 5.0 - 6.4 < 5.0
Category
Introduction Very clear Clear research Reasonably clear Poorly Very poor
(30%) research question, with a research articulated formulation of
question, clearly good question, research research
demonstrating demonstration adequate question that question, its
of its novelty of its novelty demonstration does not quite importance, and
and/or and/or of its novelty demonstrate its its novelty
importance importance and/or novelty and/or
importance importance
Methodology Methodology Methodology Methodology Methodology Methodology
(40%) very clearly clearly answers reasonably vaguely answers does not quite
answers research answers research answer research
research question; good research question; little question
question; very attention to question; attention to
good attention internal validity reasonable internal validity
to internal attention to
validity internal validity
Ethical Excellent Good Reasonable Vague Insufficient
considerations consideration of consideration of consideration of consideration of consideration of
(20%) ethical issues – ethical issues ethical issues ethical issues ethical issues
neither
overstating nor
understating
risks
Prose & style Consistently Mostly Somewhat Rarely Neither
(10%) professional and professional professional professional professional nor
clear and/or clear and/or clear and/or clear clear
Page 11 of 17
ASSESSMENT TASK 3: MID-SEMESTER EXAMINATION
• apply the methods of scientific research to answer questions and solve problems in
field settings
Aligned subject learning • recognise the strengths and limitations of these methodologies
outcomes • interpret and critically evaluate the results of applied research
• focus on the conceptual understanding of the statistical techniques presented and their
application to different research settings
Aligned professional
Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Standards
standards / competencies
Weighting 20%
The examination will be available for downloading online. You will be provided with short-answer questions and
answer a subset of them. Once the examination is opened you will have a two-hour period in which to write out
your responses and upload them to LearnJCU. Further details about the number of questions will be provided
nearer to the exam date
The mid-semester examination will be based on the work covered in the first five lectures. The examination will
be in two sections. Additional guidance, including example questions, will be provided on LearnJCU prior to the
examination.
In order to receive a passing grade on the mid-semester examination, students must achieve a minimum grade of
50%.
HD - 85%+ Outstanding work showing sophisticated understanding, critical synthesis, originality, and/or insight
with regard to the field of knowledge, and taking into consideration the level of the subject.
D - 75%+ Substantial work of high quality. Sophisticated understanding, but without the spark of originality,
synthesizing powers or insight of the HD grade.
C - 65%+ Sound, competent work, demonstrating a reasonable grasp of knowledge in the area, taking into
account subject and level.
P - 50%+ Adequate engagement with the field at a general level to justify proceeding to further coursework
study in the area.
N - <50% Work which fails to demonstrate a satisfactory grasp of the field either through poor research,
incoherence or lack of literacy.
Page 12 of 17
ASSESSMENT TASK 4: EXAMINATION
• apply the methods of scientific research to answer questions and solve problems in
field settings
Aligned subject learning • recognise the strengths and limitations of these methodologies
outcomes • interpret and critically evaluate the results of applied research
• focus on the conceptual understanding of the statistical techniques presented and their
application to different research settings
Aligned professional
Australian Psychology Accreditation Council Accreditation Standards
standards / competencies
Weighting 40%
The final examination will be based on the entire semester’s content from the lectures, readings and tutorials. It
will consist of three sections.
The examination will be available for downloading online. You will be provided with short-answer questions and
answer a subset of them. Once the examination is opened you will have a two-hour period in which to write out
your responses and upload them to LearnJCU. Further details about the number of questions will be provided
nearer to the exam date.
In order to receive a passing grade on the final examination, students must achieve a minimum grade of 50%.
Page 13 of 17
4 Submission and return of assessment
4.1 Submission of assessment
The Questionnaire Design and Analysis and the Research Proposal are to be submitted as an electronic version
through SafeAssignment in LearnJCU by midnight on the due dates.
You are required to agree to the Student Declaration presented on-screen in SafeAssign prior to uploading your
document. Please ensure that you upload either a .doc or .docx to SafeAssignment to avoid issues with
formatting. You should always retain a copy of all assignments submitted. It is NOT acceptable to submit
assessment items via email.
Note that the Learning, Teaching and Assessment Policy (5.22.3) outlines a uniform formula of penalties that will
be imposed for submission of an assessment task after the due date. This formula is 5% of the total possible
marks for the assessment item per day including part-days, weekends and public holidays. After 20 days, the
assessment item thus would be awarded 0 marks (i.e. 5% x 20 = 100% of total possible marks in penalties).
4.1.2 Extensions
Extensions for assessment tasks will only be granted where a serious and unforeseeable event has prevented you
from completing the assessment. This applies to all on-course assessment items, including the delivery of
presentations during scheduled class time. Students are required to follow the College process for requesting an
on-course assessment extension, notification of inability to attend an on-course exam or presentation,
notification of missed compulsory class, or notification of late assessment submission.
Requests for review of assessment need to follow the JCU Review of Assessment and Access to Examination
Scripts and Materials Procedure.
Please see the Current Students webpage for links to all student resources and support services to optimise your
academic and personal success.
Please see the Notification of Extenuating Circumstances webpage – this has a self-declaration form which can
been submitted if you are experiencing a negative impact on your studies, and it is in place of a medical
certificate. It can be used if you have missed compulsory classes, need an extension on assessment, need to defer
an examination, withdraw from a subject without financial/academic penalty, or apply for other Special
Consideration.
Please see the Learning Online website for information to support you while learning in a virtual environment.
Please see the Learn Student Guide webpage for general advice on plagiarism, referencing and examinations.
Here, you can also access individual and group assessment task cover sheets. Note that cover sheets are only
required for hard copy submissions.
Page 14 of 17
5 Subject calendar
Please note, the sequence of some topics may change due to staff availability, resourcing, or due to unforeseen circumstances.
Brief recap of research The Replication Crisis Research Methods in Psychology The lecture will explore concepts
approaches including directly related to all assessment
Introduction to SPSS syntax Ch 2 – Overview of the Scientific Method
constructs, variables and basic items.
(non-examinable)
concepts Ch 5 – Experimental Research
2 hr
Ethics in research Ch 12 – Descriptive Statistics
1 9-Nov-20 Introduction to JASP [software; Ch 13 – Inferential Statistics
non-examinable]
Research Methods in Psychology
2 hr
Ch 3 – Research Ethics
SPSS Statistics: A practical guide
Ch 18 – Working with syntax
The survey as non-experimental Writing a research proposal Research Methods in Psychology The lecture will explore concepts
research directly related to all assessment
application and ethics in Ch 4 – Psychological Measurement
items. Further investigation of the
Assessing reliability & validity of research
Ch 6 – Nonexperimental Research concepts introduced in the lecture
2 16-Nov-20 measures; constructing
2 hr will occur in the tutorial.
measures Ch 7 – Survey Research
3 hr SPSS Statistics: A practical guide
Ch 16 – Reliability Analysis
Factor analysis Questionnaire construction & SPSS Statistics: A practical guide The lecture will explore concepts
reliability analysis directly related to all assessment
3 hr Ch 15 – Factor Analysis
3 23-Nov-20 items. Further investigation of the
3 hr
concepts introduced in the lecture
will occur in the tutorial.
Page 15 of 17
Week/Date e.g. Lecture e.g. Workshop Readings / Preparation Relationship to assessment
Creating a quasi-experimental Factor analysis Research Methods in Psychology The lecture will explore concepts
design directly related to all assessment
2 hr Ch 8 – Quasi-experimental Research
items. Further investigation of the
4 30-Nov-20 qualitative and mixed methods
concepts introduced in the lecture
research
will occur in the tutorial.
3 hr
Data cleaning, screening, and Quasi-experimental designs SPSS Survival Manual [eBook available] The lecture will explore concepts
transformation directly related to all assessment
qualitative and mixed methods Ch 5 – Screening and cleaning the data
5 7-Dec-20 items. Further investigation of the
3 hr
2 hr Ch 8 – Manipulating the data concepts introduced in the lecture
will occur in the tutorial.
Analysis of nominal data, Data cleaning, screening, and SPSS Statistics: A practical guide The lecture will explore concepts
nonparametric statistics, transformation directly related to all assessment
Ch 17 – Nonparametric Procedures
6 14-Dec-20 items. Further investigation of the
creating a single-case design 3 hr
Research Methods in Psychology concepts introduced in the lecture
3 hr will occur in the tutorial.
Ch 10 – Single-Subject Research
No lecture; mid-term exam Analysis of nominal data, Research Methods in Psychology The lecture will explore concepts
nonparametric statistics directly related to all assessment
2 hr Ch 6.3 – Complex correlation
items. Further investigation of the
Single-case designs
Ch 12.2 – Describing Statistical Relationships concepts introduced in the lecture
7 28-Dec-20 3 hr will occur in the tutorial.
SPSS Statistics: A practical guide
Ch 12 – Correlation
Ch 13 – Multiple regression
Page 16 of 17
Week/Date e.g. Lecture e.g. Workshop Readings / Preparation Relationship to assessment
Correlations and partial Correlations, partial correlation: SPSS Statistics: A practical guide The lecture will explore concepts
correlations: Revision Revision directly related to all assessment
Ch 13 – Multiple regression
items. Further investigation of the
8 4-Jan-21 Multiple regression, hierarchical Discussion of mid-term
concepts introduced in the lecture
regression questions (tentative)
will occur in the tutorial.
3 hr 2 hr
Logistic regression Multiple regression, hierarchical SPSS Statistics: A practical guide The lecture will explore concepts
regression directly related to all assessment
3 hr Ch 14 – Logistic Regression
9 11-Jan-21 items. Further investigation of the
3 hr
concepts introduced in the lecture
will occur in the tutorial.
Final exam review Logistic regression No readings The lecture will explore concepts
directly related to all assessment
1 hr 2 hr
10 18-Jan-21 items. Further investigation of the
concepts introduced in the lecture
will occur in the tutorial.
1-Feb-21 EXAMINATIONS
Page 17 of 17