Professional Documents
Culture Documents
V.M. Agfiero,
• S.D. Williams,• B.E. Gilchris•,
2 L. HabashKrause,
2
D.C. Thompson,a W.J. Rai•, a W.J. Burke,4 andL.C. Gentile•
its local plasma environment. In the "high impedance" collection model for the Orbiter which we will refer to
mode the potential measuredbetweenthe Orbiter and as A-96 [Ag6'ero,1996]. This model was developed
the tether was very closeto the full motional EMF. In- from first principlesfor thin-sheath,currentcollection,
by Ag•'ero[1996]and Williamset al. [1997] but with a significantempiricaldifference
vestigations from the pre-
demonstrateour ability to model accuratelythe induced flight models. The principal improvementin A-96 is the
EMF voltage and thereby identify other superposed inclusionof the conductingsurfaceof the satellite de-
contributionsto the measuredvoltage. ployerboom, an •012 m long thin lattice, that had not
This study focuseson the deployed phasesof the previously been considered. Detailed measurementsof
TSS-1 and TSS-1R missions when the tether and the all Orbiter conductingsurfacesand their sheathgeome-
Orbiter were electrically coupled by a resistor, /r/o, of tries were incorporated into this model. Thus, A-96
either 15 [2 or 25 k[2, dependingon tether length. Data accountsfor ram, sheath, and thermal currents to con-
were usedfrom intervals when no electrongun was op- ductorsand avoidsmultiplecountingin the overlapping
erating. In these casesthe Orbiter chargednegatively sheathregionsbetweenboom lattice membersand be-
with respectto its local plasma. Orbiter chargingand tween the Orbiter's main enginenozzles.
ambient plasma density data acquiredduring thesein- The equation definingthe sheath thicknesstsh is
tervals were used as inputs to a numerical model of
Orbiter current collection developed to assistthe anal-
ysisof TSS-1 measurements[Ag•'ero,1996].We show
that at the higherchargingmagnitudesachievedduring
- õ qmi jB ) (2) 2• 2•eoV•
TSS-1R, the current collectedby the Orbiter greatly where V = [4o•b[and jB = 1.53Fsh,is the Bohm-
exceededmodel predictionsbased on the low-voltage correctedthermal flux acrossthe sheathedge [Bohm,
TSS-1 results. The most extreme example occurred 1949].The conducting surfacesincludedin A-96 arethe
during a 9 s interval prior to the tether break when the Orbiter enginenozzles,payloadbay vent-grills,payload
tether short circuitedto the Orbiter'sframe [Gilchrist bay conductingblankets, and payload conductingsur-
et al., 1997]. SimultaneousSPREE particle measure- faces. In the TSS-1 Orbiter attitude these yield •,16
ments in the payload bay suggestthat the additional m2 of conducting surfaceexposedto the ram currents
current was carried by secondary ions created in colli- and •,62 m2 of conducting surfacesexposed to thermal
sionsbetweensurface-generatedelectronsand ambient currents. The basicmodel assumptions are that: (1)
neutrals within the high-voltagesheath. all ram ionsenteringsheathsare collected,(2) at low
chargingmagnitudessecondaryemissionsare not sig-
Analysis and Results nificant,
and(3) photoemission
currentdensity,
•, 10-5
A/m •, contributes
negligiblyto the daytimecurrent
Values of •orb were measured by the SPREE and balancecomparedto measuredtethercurrents[Agiiero,
computedusingOhm's law. In calculating•orb we used 1996;Machuzaket al., 1996].To compareTSS-1R data
RT values of 2.0 kf• for TSS-1 and 1.8 kft for TSS-1R with A-96 predictions,a simple cosineprojection of the
[Thompsonet al., 1997]. Plasmadensitiesand satellite conductingarea to the ram direction was adopted to
potentials were recordedby a satellite Langmuirprobe account for Orbiter pitch variations of up to 40ø. The
and a DC Boom Package,respectively[ Dobrowolnyet Orbiter pitch-induced shadowingof payload-bay con-
al., 1994].We directattentionto two points:(1) Mea- ductors from the ram plasma flow was also accounted
sured and inferred values of •orb are quite consistent for by a cosineprojection into the payload bay of the
[Agiiero,1996; Gentileet al., 1997],althoughthere are aft payload bay bulkhead.
fewer SPREE measurements for TSS-1 because of the
lower chargingmagnitudesrecordedon that mission.
o
With its minimum energychannelat 9.8 eV, the SPREE 3.5 .................................... : ....................... .,
Orbiter's .limited ability to collect ion currents, /tether Figure 1. Ratios of TSS-1 tether current normal-
wouldbe small and most of •EMF wouldappearas high ized by A-96 predictions(*) and Orbiter ram current
values of •orb. Data from TSS-1 disproved this con- (o). Measurement uncertaintyisboundedby thedashed
jecture and led to the development of a new current- lines.
AG•IERO ET AL.: TSS-1R ORBITER CURRENT COLLECTION 731
10TM 10TM
, egy, Spacecraftpotential effectson the Dynamics Explorer
•' •lntegral
Number
Flux
=1.30e+11•• •lntegral
Nu•nber
Flux
=537e+09•
•> I •:, .......)I •> I •c,,,,-•r-,,,,..,,.,)l 2 satellite,J. Geophys.Res.,99(A3), 3985, 1994.
Banks, P.M., Review of electrodynamic tethers for space
• ' {10
' 'l / science, J. of Spacecr. Rockets, 26, 234, 1989.
Bohm, D., The characteristics of electrical dischargesin
magnetic fields, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1949.
Dobrowolny, M. and N.H. Stone, A technical overview of
TSS-I: the first tethered satellite system mission, I1
•1ø• ,1
!10• i ..
NuovoCimento,17C(1), 1, 1994.
Dobrowolny, M., et al., The RETE experiment for the TSS-
I mission,I1 NuovoCimento,17C(1), 101, 1994.
Ilill !___ I}/ Garrett, H.B. and A.C. Whittlesey, Spacecraft charging:
•104L(Elect[ons) I, I I
102 104 102 104 An update (AIAA 96-0143), paper presentedat 34th
Energy
(eV) Energy
(eV)
Aerospace Sci. Conf., AIAA Press, Jan. 1996.
Gentile, L.C., W.J. Burke, C.Y. Huang, J.S. Machuzak,
Figure 3. SPREEHeadA FastSweep ionandelectron D.A. Hardy, D.G. Olson, B.E. Gilchrist, J.-P. Lebreton,
spectra forthe• 600V Orbitercharging eventpriorto and C. Bonifazi, Negative Shuttle Charging during TSS-
the tetherbreak. (Time: 057/01'29'17; ESAAzimuth 1R, submitted to Geophys. Res. Left., TSS-1R Special
- 156;PeakZone- 9) Section: Part 1, 1997.
Gilchrist, B.E., C. Bonifazi, S.G. Bilen, W.J. Raitt, W.J.
Burke, N.H. Stone, and J.-P. Lebreton, Enhanced elec-
the potential acrossthe sheath approaches100 V, these trodynamic tether currents due to electron emissionfrom
electrons become very efficient sourcesfor secondary a neutral gas discharge: results from the TSS-1R mis-
ionization of neutral atoms or molecules. The neutrals sion, submitted to Geophys. Res. Left., TSS-1R Special
comefrom the local atmosphereand Orbiter outgassing, Section: Part 1, 1997.
Lebreton, J.-P., Analysis method of the Langmuir Probe I-
with a typical neutral density two ordersof magnitude
V Characteristics(Rev. 1), ESA/ESTEC/SSD Internal
higher than the plasmadensityand outgassingproduc- Note, I Mar. 1996.
ing even higher local densities. Figure 8 of $trickland Machuzak, J.S., W.J. Burke, L.C. Gentile, V.A. Davis, D.A.
et al. [1976]showsthat the cross-section for ionization Hardy, and C.Y. Huang, Thruster effects on the shut-
of neutrals by electronshas a broad peak near 100 eV. tle potential during TSS-1, J. Geophys.Res., 101, 13437,
1996.
Ions created in the sheath by the acceleratedelectrons Papadopoulos,K., Scalingof beam plasma dischargefor low
are attracted to the Orbiter surface,thus contributing magnetic fields, J. Geophys.Res., 91, 1627, 1986.
to the total collected current. There are then three Stone, N.H. and C. Bonifazi, The TSS-1R mission: overview
sourcesof current to the Orbiter, accelerated ambient and scientific context, submitted to Geophys. Res. Left.,
ions, emitted electrons and secondaryions. To explain TSS-1R Special Section: Part 1, 1997.
Strickland, D.J., D.L. Book, T.P. Coffey, and J.A. Fedder,
the factor of nine increasein current observedduring Transport equation techniques for the deposition of auro-
event "A" the efficiency of secondaryionization must ral electrons, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2755, 1976.
be very high, approachingconditionssimilar to thoseof Thompson, D.C., et al., The current-voltage characteristics
beam-plasmadischargeobservedin laboratory plasmas of a large probe in low earth orbit: TSS-1R results, sub-
[Papadopoulos,
1986(and the references
therein)]. mitted to Geophys. Res. Left., TSS-1R Special Section:
Part 1, 1997.
Williams, S.D., B.E. Gilchrist, V.M. Agfiero, R.S. Indiresan,
Acknowledgments.
D.C. Thompson, and W.J. Raitt, TSS-1R vertical electric
This work was supported in part by NASA contracts
fields: Long baseline measurementsusing an electrody-
NAS8-36812 and NAS8-39381. We are grateful for the
namic tether as a double probe, submitted to Geophys.
data from the Research on Electrodynamic Tether Effects
Res. Left., TSS-1R Special Section: Part 1, 1997.
(RETE) plasmasensorpackageprovidedby the SpaceSci-
encesDepartment(SSD) of ESA/ESTEC. The RETE DC
Boom Package(DCBP) satellite chargingand Langmuir V.M. Agfiero and S.D. Williams, STAR Lab/MS-
Probe (LP) plasmadensitydata werecontributedby J.-P. 9515, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. (email:
Lebretonfrom the ESA/ESTEC/SSD. Recognitionis given aguero@nova.stanford.edu; scott@nova.stanford.edu)
to P.M. Banks, D.S. Lauben, P.R. Williamson, and A.B. W.J. Burke, GeophysicsDirectorate, Phillips Laboratory,
White for their contributions to the TSS missions. 29 Randolph Road, Hanscorn Air Force Base, MA 01731.
(email: burke@plh.af.
mil)
L.C. Gentile, Boston College Inst. for ScientificRes., St.
References Clement's Hall 402, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut
Hill, MA 02167.(email:gentile,@plh.af.
mil)
Agiiero, V.M., P.M. Banks, B.E. Gilchrist, I. Linscott, W.J. B.E. Gilchrist and L. Habash Krause, Space Physics Res.
Raitt, D.C. Thompson, V.V. Tolat, A.B. White, S.D. Lab., 2455 Hayward Ave, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. (email:
Williams, and P.R. Williamson, The shuttle electrody- gilchrst@eecs.umich.edu;
quantum@eecs.umich.edu)
namictethersystem(SETS) onTSS-1, I1NuovoCimento, D.C. Thompson and W.J. Raitt, CASS/SER218D,
17C(1), 49, 1994. Utah State University., Logan, UT 84322. (email:
Agiiero, V.M., A study of electrical chargingon large LEO thompson@demise.cass.usu.edu;
raitt@cass.usu.edu)
spacecraft using a tethered satellite as a remote plasma
reference, PhD thesis, Stanford Univ., June 1996. (ReceivedJanuary 16, 1997; revisedSeptember24, 1997;
Anderson, P.C., W.B. Hanson, W.R. Coley, and W.R. Ho- acceptedOctober 13, 1997.)