WORKING PAPER

Current Issues of Health Program Planning and Evaluation During

COVID-19 Crisis in Indonesia

This working paper will assist you in understanding the structure, achievement, and existing problems
on the health programs management in Indonesia. Use this filled working paper to have further
discussion with your team.

Instructions in using this working paper

Pay attention to the lectures both at main hall class and the breakout room class. The lectures will give
you a board understanding of current issues in health program management. Please also relate the
issues with the context of COVID-19 pandemic.

At the end of breakout room, you will be giving time to discuss with your other team member. Please
compile your work with your friends work to finalize your team’s working paper.
Table 1

Program INPUT ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES

Title
& Short-term (no longer Long-term
than a year)
AUDIENCE

Activities:

Audience:

Activities:

Audience:

Activities:
 Audience:

INPUT EVALUATION PROCESS EVALUATION OUTPUT EVALUATION OUTCOME EVALUATION

Example:
Program title : Exclusive breastfeeding program

Input : Man:

Midwives, health cadres, nutritionist in Public Health Centre

Money:

Local government budget and supported by National government

budget

Material:

Flip chart, video/social media campaign

Method:

Health facility-based (audience must visit health facility to access the

program)

Machine:

LCD projector, audio visual

Time:

Monthly

Activities & audience

Activities 1 : Health counseling

Audience 1 : Newborn parents

Activities 2 : Emo-demo campaign

Audience 2 Caregiver (parents/grandparents/baby sitter)

Output 1 : Increased awareness and self-efficacy

Output 2 : Increased knowledge and breastfeeding practices

Outcomes :

Short term : Increased exclusive breastfeeding coverage

 Long term : Decreased stunting

Input evaluation : 1. There are only limited health cadres who have deep
comprehension on exclusive breastfeeding

2. Program fund is released in the mid of the year

Process evaluation : 1. Parents could not attend the health counseling due to work
hours

2. There were limited health cadres who committed to support

the program

Output evaluation : Many of working mothers mentioned that they need more technical
guideline in breastfeeding pumping

Outcome evaluation : 1. Some of health facilities still suggest parents to give formula
milk for their newborn

2. Working mothers only granted two months maternity leaves

Nama : MUCHAMAD DAFFA SAIFULLAH

NIM : 101911133125

KELAS : IKM5C2019

Breakoutroom 2: PHBS (Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat) & Protokol Kesehatan

Program title : CTPS (Cuci Tangan Pakai Sabun) di Dusun Pringgolayan

Input : Man: MahasiswaUniversitas Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta dan

masyarakat Dusun Pringgolayan

Money: Dana tim pengabdian masyarakat mahasiswa FKM Universitas

Ahmad Dahlan Yogyakarta

Material: Kuisioner, banner, video cara CTPS yang baik dan benar

Method: Pre test dan post test, penampilan video CTPS, ceramah,
 penyuluhan dan pelatihan cara CTPS, pemasangan banner promkes

Machine: LCD, proyektor, laptop, soundsystem, microfone

Time: Pelaksanaan kegiatan PPM yaitu pada hari Rabu-Kamis, 19-20

Februari 2020, dan pemasangan banner di lakukan pada tanggal 26
Februari 2020

Activities & audience

Activities 1 : Penyuluhan, pelatihan CTPS dengan disertai pemutaran video

Audience 1 : Ibu-Ibu di Dusun Pringgolayan

Activities 2 : Pemasangan media promosi kesehatan berupa banner

Audience 2 Masyarakat Dusun Pringgolayan

Output 1 : Memberikan pengetahuan dasar mengenai cara melakukan Cuci

Tangan Pakai Sabun yang baik dan benar

Output 2 : Meningkatkan kesadaran masyarakat mengenai pentingnya

melakukan Cuci Tangan Pakai Sabun yang baik dan benar

Outcomes :

Short term : Masyarakat mulai terbiasa menerapkan CTPS yang baik dan benar
dalam kehidupan sehari-hari.

Long term : Mengurangi penyakit yang ditimbulkan akibat kurangnya Higine

personal seperti diare dan mengurangi penyebaran virus Covid-19.

Input evaluation : 1. Program tersebut tidak dilaksanakan secara berkelanjutan/

rutin.

2. Fasilitas CTPS di Dusun Pringgolayan kurang memadai karena

tidak ada fasilitas cuci tangan.

Process evaluation : 1. masyarakat masih ada yang tidak hadir dikarenakan kesibukan
bekerja.

2. Partisipasi masyarakat masih kurang

Output evaluation : 1. Kebiasaan masyarakat yang masih malas untuk melakukan

CTPS yang baik dan benar meskipun mereka sudah
mengetahui pentingnya CTPS

Outcome evaluation : 1. Para mahasiswa masih kurang dalam menjelaskan dampak

buruk apa saja yang ditimbulkan jika tidak menerapkan CTPS
dengan baik.