TODAY'S PAPER | APRIL 16, 2021

Diverging paths
Khurram Husain | Published April 15, 2021 - | Updated a day ago

The writer is a business and economy journalist.

LAST week, I wrote that there appears to be a tussle within the government at the
highest levels over the future direction that the country’s economic policy will take.
The prime minister is sounding fed up with the austerity imposed under the IMF
programme, and under pressure from his own party’s lawmakers, is looking to
loosen the constraints of the programme and spend a little more than he has been
allowed to thus far. However, another player, whose identity is not known but who
seems to also be calling the shots within the government, seems to want to stick to
the commitments given to the IMF.

I said how things work out as this tussle wears on will become clearer when three
questions are answered. First, who will be the next finance minister of Pakistan? The
persistent rumour that Hammad Azhar is about to be replaced by Shaukat Tarin has only
been reinforced since last week. He was waiting for NAB’s appeal against his acquittal in
the rental power case to be decided, but the Islamabad High Court threw a spanner in that
expectation by refusing to hear the case on an expedited timeline as NAB requested in its
plea. But on Tuesday, he paid a visit to the FBR, and according to reports in the press,
stayed there for a few hours getting a detailed briefing from the high-ups in the tax
authority. Whether or not he’ll be coming in remains an open question, but it is looking
increasingly likely according to continuous press commentary.
Second, we needed to see the IMF staff report for the programme that was negotiated and
agreed to by Hafeez Sheikh only days before his unceremonious departure. That report
has now been uploaded — and not only that, the budget strategy paper of the government
has also been unveiled. The staff report shows us what commitments the government
made to the Fund. The strategy paper shows us what it is moving to do in the forthcoming
budget. And there are important discrepancies between the two. Those tell an important
story.

Third, we needed to see what the intentions of the new finance minister — whoever
actually replaces Hafeez Sheikh — really are. Hammad seems to have made some of that
known following a chat with the IMF’s managing director on Monday, following which she
tweeted that “the way forward for vital economic reforms” was discussed as well as
“external financing needed” by the country to meet its challenges in the months ahead. It
seems like they are not only asking for relaxation of the targets, but additional support as
well.

The strategy paper shows a significant

deviation from the commitments given to
the IMF by Hafeez Sheikh.

Some clues on what sort of relaxation they are looking for are provided by comparing the
targets in the budget strategy paper with those committed to the IMF a few weeks ago.
Let’s start at the top and compare these numbers. The Fund projects the growth rate of the
economy to be four per cent next year while the strategy paper projects 4.2pc, so already a
discrepancy will open up in all other figures as the headline number has been nudged up a
little. Keep in mind with total GDP projected to be around Rs52 trillion, a 0.2pc difference
means well over Rs100bn.

After this the Fund sees the fiscal deficit at 5.5pc next year while the government is saying
6pc in the strategy paper, meaning a discrepancy of more than Rs260bn. Meeting even this
6pc target will require that the provinces more than double their surpluses next year,
where they have struggled to meet even the budgeted surpluses in the past. It’s a safe bet
that even this elevated 6pc target will prove challenging. The Fund projects the primary
balance to be in surplus by Rs143 next year, while the strategy paper projects it to be in
deficit by Rs49bn instead, meaning a Rs192bn discrepancy.
Moving on, the government is aiming to collect total revenues of around Rs8 trillion next
year as per the strategy paper, but to the Fund they have committed Rs8.8tr, a discrepancy
of Rs800bn. They are planning to spend Rs800bn as part of the federal development
budget, while to the Fund they have committed that this amount will be Rs627bn, a
discrepancy of Rs173bn.

So already some elements of the ‘new direction’ seem to be coming into view: higher
spending and fewer taxes. As a result, the deficits will be elevated, borrowing costs will be
higher by Rs45bn, and public debt will be one percentage point of GDP higher than what
has been committed to the Fund.

In part, this elevated spending and reduced tax burden will be financed through
borrowing. But another important discrepancy could be pregnant with lots of meaning
regarding the tussle over the finance ministership. The Fund was told by Hafeez Sheikh
that defence spending next year will be Rs1.444tr, higher by 12.5pc from the current year’s
projected total. But in the strategy paper, defence spending is given as Rs1.33tr, lower by
Rs114bn from the committed, and representing a meagre 3.6pc increase from this year.

The strategy paper shows a significant deviation from the commitments given to the IMF
by Hafeez Sheikh, with the government aiming to free up more space for itself through a
relaxation of its budget deficit and debt reduction targets, as well as by reallocating
expenditures away from defence towards development.

It seems that Imran Khan is feeling the pain of the adjustment that he has had to
undertake — with a short hiatus between last April till now — and is keen to spend money
to shore up the sagging and beleaguered electoral prospects of his party lawmakers. He is
under growing pressure from within his party to do more to alleviate people’s suffering
under high unemployment, high inflation and stagnant (or declining) wages. But resources
are limited, and the constraints on his ability to spend are strong. This is what lies behind
the tussle over the finance minister slot. The numbers provide a clue as to who is tussling
over what.

The writer is a business and economy journalist.

khurram.husain@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, April 15th, 2021

Latest Stories
Jodia Bazaar shuts down in protest NA panel directs timely imports to bridge cotton,
wheat shortages

Govt asked to prioritise o shore exploration Petroleum prices cut by up to 2.5pc

CCoE extends at tari for industrial consumers till Peshawar police book Aurat March organisers over
June 2022 blasphemy

Princes William, Harry won’t walk side-by-side at grandfather's funeral

Jennifer Lopez and A-Rod split for real this time

Irrfan Khan's wife wrote a poem about how their son cries all night at the loss of his father

Most Popular
01 Government has decided to ban TLP under anti-terror law, says interior minister

02 French embassy advises citizens to leave Pakistan after TLP protests

03 Pakistani, Indian o cials held talks in Dubai over Kashmir

04 Babar Azam dethrones Kohli to become top ranked ODI batsman

05 UAE is mediating between India and Pakistan, says senior diplomat

06 India, big vaccine exporter, now seeks imports as Covid cases soar

07 Biden presses Pakistan as he announces Afghan exit

08 Law stipulates that the ship will remain seized until the amount is paid in full

09 What does the TLP want?

Must Read

Editorial: A blanket ban on the TLP is a futile attempt to solve a complex problem
The ban will not dilute the narrative that fuels the party, it may even fan it.

What do legal experts have to say about the ban on the TLP?

It is naive to pretend that proscribing an organisation equates to

eliminating the causes of militancy

In pictures: Muslims in Pakistan and around the world mark a second

Ramazan under Covid-19's shadow
Dawn.com | AFP
 Schooling will remain a challenge unless most of Pakistan is
vaccinated by September

Opinion

Education disrupted
Faisal Bari
The cost of not doing anything about them in terms of learning losses and dropouts are going to be very
large.

16 Apr 2021

Women and autism

Different assessment tools are needed to define and measure the subtle
ways in which autistic women cope with the world around

16 Apr 2021
 Planning families
Family planning does not go against Islamic values.

Updated 16 Apr 2021

Beyond the ban

Formal bans do not translate into substantial dents.

15 Apr 2021

Protectors of people’s rights

Where states and other powerful actors fear accountability, they also fear
human rights defenders.

Editorial
Updated 16 Apr 2021

Ban is no answer
The ban will not dilute the narrative that fuels the party, it may even fan it.

16 Apr 2021

Slow recovery
THE pace of growth in large-scale manufacturing output continues to slow down, with LSM production
contracting by...

16 Apr 2021

Ramazan pro teering

WITH the month of Ramazan underway, people have begun to feel the effects of galloping inflation
even more. Prices...

Updated 15 Apr 2021

 Afghanistan exit
Afghanistan has suffered for decades as powerful local players have refused
to compromise and have insisted on hogging power.

15 Apr 2021

New census
EARLIER this week, the Council of Common Interests approved the controversial National Population
and Housing ...

15 Apr 2021

With no place to go
No matter where one looks, one can’t escape the heartrending sight of scores of children of all ages
begging, ...