You are on page 1of 9

See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264409693

Organoleptic and Chemical Changes during


Storage of Sea Bass Marinades ( Dicentrarchus
labrax L., 1758)

Article in Journal of Food Processing and Preservation · June 2014


DOI: 10.1111/jfpp.12065

CITATION READS

1 105

2 authors, including:

Gülderen Kurt Kaya


Munzur University, Tunceli, Turkey
17 PUBLICATIONS 71 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Effect of Rosehip Sauce on Chemical and Sensory Quality of Marinated Anchovy View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Gülderen Kurt Kaya on 31 October 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


Journal of Food Processing and Preservation ISSN 1745-4549

ORGANOLEPTIC AND CHEMICAL CHANGES DURING


STORAGE OF SEA BASS MARINADES (DICENTRARCHUS
LABRAX L., 1758)
GÜLDEREN KURT KAYA1,3 and ÖZDEN BAŞTÜRK2
1
Fisheries Faculty, Department of Fish Processing Technology, Tunceli University, Tunceli 62100, Turkey
2
Fisheries Faculty, Department of Basic Science, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey

3
Corresponding author. ABSTRACT
TEL: (90)-428-2131794;
FAX: (90)-428-2131861; Chemical and organoleptic changes in sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) preserved at
EMAIL: gkurtkaya@tunceli.edu.tr 4C for 200 days have been investigated in this study. To prepare the fish fillets for
study, they were put, at a ratio of 1:1.5 (fish : marinade brine), for marination into
Received for Publication February 5, 2012
the brine containing 11% salt and 3.5% acetic acid. After the maturation process,
Accepted for Publication November 21, 2012
samples were divided into two groups and packed in sealed plastic containers as
doi:10.1111/jfpp.12065 plain and sauced and preserved for 200 days.
At both groups packed as plain and sauced, TVB-N, TBA, TMA-N and peroxide
number values were at acceptable limits during the storage of 200 days. It can be
determined that both of the groups were approved in organoleptic terms;
however, the sea bass marinades packed as plain were better approved.
Our study shows that sea bass marinades packed as plain and sauced can be
stored for 200 days without any quality problems.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS
As the processed products are easy to store and bring a large margin of profit and
always ready for the market, developing new products will contribute greatly to
the aquaculture processing sector. Marinade processing technology is one of the
cheapest technologies in aquaculture products processing and preservation
methods, and it is very important in that it enriches the taste of fish, adds flavor
and provides a longer shelf life. In the Mediterranean countries, sea bass ranks first
in saltwater aquaculture and is among the most important aquaculture products.
However; making use of the fish, especially which could not be sold or are under-
sold in the yield period, with the help of alternative processing methods can con-
tribute to producers, the fisheries processing sector and the national economy. It
was determined that sea bass marinades packed as plain and sauced can be stored
for 200 days and can still retain their quality.

and aroma to the product by having a proteolytic and


INTRODUCTION
lipolytic effect on the fish (Mclay 1972; Schenderyuk and
Marination is a technology that enhances the endurance of Byokowsky 1990).
fresh, frozen and dry salted fish or fish parts by means of Marinades are obtained by using three methods: cold,
maturation, using an acetic acid and salt mixture without cooked and fried. A cold marinade is a marination prepared
heat effects. The end product of marination is called mari- without applying a heat process. Fresh, frozen and salted
nade. The marinated products can be flavored with spices, fish can be used with this method. Generally, there are two
sauce, cream, mayonnaise and oil (Varlik et al. 2004). stages in preparing cold marinades. The aim of the first
The marination stops bacterial enzyme activity under the stage, which is also called the conditioning stage, is to soften
effect of acetic acid and salt. Thus, the product will have a the muscles of the fillet fish and enable the development of
longer shelf life. In addition, acetic acid and salt give flavor characteristic taste (Connell 1980). The second stage is

1072 Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS

taking the fish out of the brine, draining them and then ing the samples were separated into two groups; 70 g
putting into boxes quickly. In the packing stage, they are chopped garlic and 10 g chopped dill were added to the
packed in brine, oil or sauce (Gökoğlu 2002). brine solution of the first group. Nothing was added to the
The quality of the marinade depends on the freshness, solution of the second group. After 24 h, the fish were taken
composition and maturity level of the fish, the quantity of out of the solutions and drained. The first group was packed
water, oil and the contents of the conditioning solution, the in sauce, and the second was packed in oil. The boxes (Bora,
conditioning process, the hygiene conditions of the facili- Istanbul, Turkey) used for the packing were 300-mL volu-
ties, and especially the season and place of capture. Further- minous, plastic, airtight and watertight. For the group
more, additives such as spice, sauce, cream, oil, mayonnaise, packed in oil, 210 g of fish and 105 mL of sunflower seed oil
parsley and dill have essential effects on quality (Gülyavuz were put into each packet. For the group packed in sauce,
and Ünlüsayın 1999). 210 g of fish, 100 mL of sunflower seed oil, 4 g of tomato
As the processed products are easy to store and bring a sauce, 3 g of garlic and a leaf of dill were put into each
large margin of profit, and are always ready for the market, packet. All the packets were stored at +4C. The marinades
developing new products will contribute greatly to the were examined in terms of chemical composition (crude
aquaculture processing sector. The marinade processing protein, lipids, dry materials and crude ash), chemical
technology is one of the cheapest technologies in the pro- quality changes (thiobarbituric acid, total volatile basic
cessing and preservation methods of aquaculture products; nitrogen, trimethylamine-nitrogen and peroxide number)
and it contributes to the enrichment of the taste of the fish, and the organoleptic angle (appearance, texture, flavor) on
adds flavor and provides a longer shelf life. day 0 (accepted as the beginning of the post-maturation
Sea bass is one of the most important species of Turkish period); and on days 15, 30 and 50; and on a monthly basis
aquaculture. It is generally consumed as fresh or chilled. In from day 50 onward up until day 200.
the yield period, this fish is occasionally undersold because
of not finding buyers at the market price. The aim of the Analysis
study was to investigate the marination suitability of sea
The crude protein was analysed according to the Kjeldahl
bass and develop a product that may contribute to the
method (James 1995). The crude fat analyses were done
sector.
according to Bligh and Dyer (1959). The moisture was
analysed according to Ludorff and Meyer (1973). The crude
MATERIAL AND METHODS ashanalysis were done according to Mattissek et al. (1988).
The TBA number analyses were done according to Tarladgis
Raw Material et al. (1960). The total volatile basic nitrogen (TVB-N)
values were based on Antonacopoulos and Vyncke (1989).
See bass purchased from aquaculture of Mersin, Turkey in
The trimethylamine-nitrogen analyses were done according
July 2007 was used. Total of 30 kg fish were obtained. Each
to Varlık et al. (2007) and peroxide number (POS) analyses
of the sea bass was 200–300 kg in weight. The fish were
were done according to the AOAS (1994) method.
carried in ice in Styrofoam boxes (Strobuzkap, Onay
For the sensory evaluation, Schormuller’s (1968) organo-
Machine Co. Inc., Istanbul, Turkey). After the fish were
leptic evaluation diagram, which was modified by Varlik
transferred to the laboratory, the heads of the fish were cut;
et al. (1993), was used. The organoleptic evaluation was
their internal organs were removed and filleted by experts.
done by five experienced panelists in terms of appearance,
smell and taste criteria by giving points between 1 and 9.
Marination Process The score of 1.0–3.9 denoted as spoiled, the score of 4.0–6.9
indicated “good” quality, the score of 7–9 indicated “very
For the marination process, 3.5% of acetic acid (Merck
good” quality. Texture analyses were made by giving points
Group, Istanbul, Turkey) and 11% of salt (Safir Industrial
between 1 and 4. The score of 1 denoted as spoiled, the
Salt, Safir, Ankara, Turkey) were used. The samples were
score of 2 indicated “acceptable,” the score of 3 indicated
dipped in capped plastic boxes (Erbaşlar Plastic, Adana,
“good” quality and the score of 4 indicated “very good”
Turkey) of 10 L at a ratio of 1:1.5 (fish : brine) for matura-
quality.
tion at +4C. Four kilograms of fish was put into each box,
and the boxes were sealed. After a period of 2 days, the
Statistical Analysis
boxes were opened, and it was seen that the fish had
matured. Statistical evaluations of the chemical and sensory analysis
The fish that have completed marination period were were made by using SPSS 11.5 software program. Data were
skinned and put again into the solution. This process was treated by analysis of repeated-measurement analysis of
continued in 30 min. At this stage, the plastic boxes contain- ariance (ANOVA).

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1073
ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK

TABLE 1. THE VALUES OF THE CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF MARINADES DURING THE STORAGE PERIOD

Food composition in terms of the packing style


Protein (%) Lipid (%) Moisture (%) Ash (%)
Storage
time (day) Sauced Plain Sauced Plain Sauced Plain Sauced Plain
Raw material 18.99 ⫾ 0.29 18.99 ⫾ 0.29 4.73 ⫾ 0.40 4.73 ⫾ 0.40 74.16 ⫾ 0.26 74.16 ⫾ 0.26 1.08 ⫾ 0.07 1.08 ⫾ 0.07
0 19.13 ⫾ 0.14 19.67 ⫾ 0.25 6.43 ⫾ 0.23 6.17 ⫾ 0.30 69.27 ⫾ 0.74 61.90 ⫾ 1.60 4.51 ⫾ 0.25 4.81 ⫾ 0.07
15 20.57 ⫾ 0.49 21.28 ⫾ 0.69 5.93 ⫾ 0.23 4.83 ⫾ 0.08 68.17 ⫾ 0.10 67.16 ⫾ 0.17 4.70 ⫾ 0.05 5.09 ⫾ 0.04
30 20.95 ⫾ 0.10 20.09 ⫾ 1.26 6.33 ⫾ 0.81 6.13 ⫾ 0.40 67.38 ⫾ 0.10 67.25 ⫾ 0.23 4.86 ⫾ 0.04 5.19 ⫾ 0.07
50 19.97 ⫾ 0.66 20.86 ⫾ 0.52 6.60 ⫾ 0.13 6.90 ⫾ 0.16 66.36 ⫾ 0.59 65.56 ⫾ 0.26 4.65 ⫾ 0.04 5.12 ⫾ 0.04
80 20.95 ⫾ 0.42 21.35 ⫾ 0.51 6.77 ⫾ 0.14 5.47 ⫾ 0.38 65.09 ⫾ 0.37 63.82 ⫾ 0.42 4.72 ⫾ 0.05 4.91 ⫾ 0.10
110 21.76 ⫾ 0.38 22.58 ⫾ 0.18 7.10 ⫾ 0.24 6.20 ⫾ 0.36 65.52 ⫾ 0.31 65.57 ⫾ 1.15 4.72 ⫾ 0.12 4.88 ⫾ 0.09
140 22.55 ⫾ 0.38 23.01 ⫾ 0.32 6.45 ⫾ 0.21 5.06 ⫾ 0.09 66.26 ⫾ 0.85 66.79 ⫾ 1.23 4.60 ⫾ 0.19 4.46 ⫾ 0.59
170 23.08 ⫾ 0.40 23.61 ⫾ 0.73 6.93 ⫾ 0.15 4.99 ⫾ 0.06 65.32 ⫾ 0.41 65.35 ⫾ 0.37 4.56 ⫾ 0.10 4.33 ⫾ 0.47
200 24.65 ⫾ 0.51 23.79 ⫾ 0.22 5.30 ⫾ 0.24 5.14 ⫾ 0.04 65.18 ⫾ 0.45 66.19 ⫾ 0.76 4.60 ⫾ 0.07 4.14 ⫾ 0.04

n = 3 (mean value ⫾ standard deviation).

Fuentes et al. (2009) compared the qualities of cultured


RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
and natural sea bass in Greece and Spain, and found the
fat rate for the raw material to be 4.38 ⫾ 0.72% and
Chemical Composition of the Samples
4.57 ⫾ 0.17%, respectively. We have found similar results
Changes in the chemical composition of the sea bass used in (the fat rate for the raw material was 4.73 ⫾ 0.40%) in this
the study were examined in the raw material, in marinated study.
fillets and after placing those into plastic boxes during the While the moisture rate in the sea bass fillets of the raw
conservation period; and the data obtained during the study material was determined as 74.16 ⫾ 0.26%, it was
are given in Table 1. 61.90 ⫾ 16.0% in the plain group and 69.27 ⫾ 0.74% in the
The statistical analysis showed that the crude protein per- sauced group, after the marinade matured. The difference
centage of the sea bass packed as plain increased on day 15 between them was found to be statistically insignificant. The
but decreased on day 30; after the storage period, it moisture rates of the marinades packed as sauced and plain
increased linearly up to 23.79 ⫾ 1.22% on day 200. Similar showed a definite change in the first 15 days of the mari-
changes were seen in the marinades packed as sauced; only nade and stayed stable for the rest of the storage period. No
the protein percentage increased on day 30, decreased on significant difference was found between the groups and
day 50 and reached 24.65 ⫾ 0.51% on day 200. between the stages in the groups (P > 0.05).
The crude protein level of 19.10 ⫾ 0.33% ,which Fuentes The ash content – determined as 1.08 ⫾ 0.07% in the raw
et al. (2009) obtained from sea bass raised in aquaculture material – reached 4.81 ⫾ 0.07% in the group packed as
conditions, overlaps with the value of the raw material plain and 4.51 ⫾ 0.025% in the group packed as sauced on
obtained in our study as 18.99 ⫾ 0.29%. In another study day 0, when the marinade matured. The crude ash rate of
that investigates the nutritional and mineral content of sea plain and sauced marinades increased in the first 30 days
bass and sea bream, Erkan and Özden (2007) determine the of storage but decreased regularly in the following days,
crude protein level of sea bass as 20.35 ⫾ 0.41%, which is and reached 4.14 ⫾ 0.04% in the plain marinade and
close to the value obtained in our study. 4.22 ⫾ 0.06% in the sauced marinade on day 200. Thus, the
While the lipid rate – determined as 4.73 ⫾ 0.04% in differences on days 0, 15, 30, 50 and 200 were found to be
the raw material – was determined as 6.43 ⫾ 0.23% in the significant (P < 0.05). In contrast, the differences on days
sauced marinade group on day 0, when the marinade 80, 110, 140 and 170 were found to be insignificant
matured, and as 6.17 ⫾ 0.30% in the plain marinade group; (P > 0.05).
it was recorded as 5.30 ⫾ 0.24% in the sauced group and as While the percentage of moisture content determined in
5.14 ⫾ 0.04% in the plain group at the end of the storage the raw material was the same as the value found by Fuentes
period. The lipid content (%) of the marinades packed as et al. (2009) – 74.56 ⫾ 0.26% – it was close to the values
plain varied and did not yield a definite change sequence determined by Erkan and Özden (2007) as 70.21 ⫾ 0.64%.
(increasing or decreasing). However, the lipid content (%) The crude ash content determined in our study is compat-
of the sauced marinades increased steadily and decreased ible with the crude ash content determined by Erkan and
sharply on day 200. Özden (2007) and Fuentes et al. (2009).

1074 Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS

plain and sauced marinades, respectively, at the end of the


storage period. According to these results, it can be deter-
mined that both of the marinades were of good quality in
terms of TVB-N values, and a significant difference was
not seen between the marinade groups. It can be seen that
there is a parallel between the values acquired in our study,
at the end of the storage period, and the TVB-N value that
Olgunoğlu (2007) determined as 16.91 ⫾ 0.66 mg/100 g at
the end of a 7-month storage period in his study on
anchovy marinades. Aksu et al. (1997) recorded that the
TVB-N value in their marine anchovy was 8.3 mg/100 g,
and it reached 15.2 mg/100 g at the end of a storage period
of 150 days; similarly, Dokuzlu (2000) recorded that
9.8 mg/100 g of TVB-N content reached 14 mg/100 g at
the end of a storage period of 8 months at 4C. Özden and
Baygar (2003), in their study, report that, although the
increases in TVB-N values varied during the storage
FIG. 1. THE CHANGES OF TVB-N VALUES IN SEA BASS MARINADES
PACKED AS PLAIN AND SAUCED DURING STORAGE PERIOD
period, the recorded TVB-N values of anchovy, horse
mackerel, chub mackerel and sardine – until day 120 –
were under the consumable limit values. In another study
conducted by Varlık et al. (2000), the TVB-N value was
Chemical Quality Changes
recorded as 10.45 mg/100 g onday 150. In a study con-
While the TVB-N value of the fresh sea bass used for mari- ducted by Gökoğlu et al. (2004), it was determined that the
nades was determined as 15.24 ⫾ 0.02 mg/100 g, it was TVB-N value in marinades, prepared by using 2% of acetic
determined as 13.33 ⫾ 0.1 mg/100 g in the sauced group acid and 10% of salt, went from 9.3 mg/100 g to 30.2 mg/
and as 13.12 ⫾ 0.58 mg/100 g in the plain group at the 100 g on day 150; and it went from 10.3 mg/100 g to
beginning of the storage; and it was determined as 18.14 ⫾ 23.3 mg/100 g in the marinades prepared by using 4% of
0.02 mg/100 g in the sauced group and as 16.77 ⫾ 0.03 mg/ acetic acid and 10% of salt and, at the end of 150 days, it
100 g in the plain group at the end of the storage period. In was within the consumable limit values. In another study,
terms of the TVB-N value, it can be seen that both sauced investigating the shelf life of sardines marinated in tomato
and plain marinades can retain properties of a good quality sauce (Kılınç and Çaklı 2005), pasteurization was applied
product until day 200. and the unpasteurized samples were reported to have a
The TVB-N changes in the groups during the storage shelf life of 6 months. The TVB-N levels were reported to
period are shown in Fig. 1. The TVB-N levels of the plain increase to 19.13 mg/100 g in the pasteurized samples and
and sauced marinades decreased in the first 15 days, and to 28.47 mg/100 g in the unpasteurized samples at the end
increased steadily in the ensuing storage period. According of 6 months. In a study on the biochemical and bacterio-
to these results, it can be determined that there was a statis- logical review of marinades obtained from cephalopoda,
tically (P < 0.01) meaningful difference between the plain crustaceans and gasteropots, Özoğlu et al. (2007) recorded
and sauced groups. Generally, an important decrease in the that the TVB-N value of 6.05 mg/100 g at the beginning of
TVB-N values was seen in both of the groups in the first 15 the storage period increased to 11.19 mg/100 g at the end
days. A slower, but significant, increase occurred after day of 5 months of storage.
30; and it continued in a way that did not suggest any While the TBA value of the raw material is recorded
meaningful significance (P > 0.05) after day 110. It can be as 1.05 ⫾ 0.60 mg MA/kg in our study, it increased to
determined that there was a serious increase after day 110, 1.27 ⫾ 0.03 mg MA/kg in the plain marinades, and to
and it was statistically significant (P < 0.05). 1.68 ⫾ 0.04 mg MA/kg in the sauced marinades on day 0.
In the quality classification of fisheries, in terms of The differences between the groups were found to be statis-
TVB-N values, samples containing 25 mg/100 mg of tically insignificant (P > 0.05). The change in the TBA
TVB-N are defined as “very good”; 30 mg/100 g as “good”; number during the storage period is given in Fig. 2.
35 mg/100 g as “marketable”; and samples containing more As seen in Fig. 2, the TBA value (1.27 ⫾ 0.03 mg MA/kg
than 35 mg/100 g of TVB-N are defined as “bad” (Huss in the plain marinades and 1.68 ⫾ 0.04 mg MA/kg in the
1988). The increase in TVB-N values determined in the sauced marinades) on day 0 continued to increase during
marinades during the storage period was recorded as the storage, and it reached 5.87 ⫾ 0.09 mg MA/kg in the
16.77 ⫾ 0.03/18 mg/100 g and 14 ⫾ 0.02 mg/100 g in the sauced samples and 5.65 ⫾ 0.19 mg MA/kg in the plain

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1075
ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK

good quality; although, during 90 days of storage, there was


not a regular increase. These values support our findings.
Kılınç and Çaklı (2005) stored pasteurized and unpasteur-
ized sardine marinades with tomato at 4C, and determined
initial TBA values as 4.33 mg MA/kg and 4.47 mg MA/kg,
respectively. It was thought that the reason for the high
initial TBA values in their study was the usage of sardine
fillets frozen and stored for 5 months.
They, nonetheless, proved that the TBA values, in the
order mentioned above, rose to 8.14 mg MA/kg and
8.21 mg MA/kg at the end of 6 months; and they state that
the shelf life for the product was 6 months at +4C. Even
though their initial values do not overlap with our results,
they support our results concerning the shelf life of the
product. Olgunoğlu (2007) states that the TBA values in the
anchovy marinades showed as 1.16 mg MA/kg at the begin-
ning of the storage showed a regular increase and reached
FIG. 2. THE CHANGES IN TBA VALUES IN SEA BASS MARINADES
4.20 mg MA/kg at the end of 7 months of storage. These
PACKED AS PLAIN AND SAUCED DURING STORAGE PERIOD
results are lower than the TBA levels of the marinades in
our study. It is thought that this difference, which influences
samples. In the statistical comparison between the TBA the quality of the marinades, is the result of a good raw
values at the end of the research, the difference between the material, good storage heat, and acid and salt level of the
groups for day 110 was found to be significant (P < 0.05), solution, as well as the use of additives.
but it was found to be insignificant (P > 0.05) for the rest of The TMA-N value, determined as 1.39 ⫾ 0.01 mg/100 g
the storage period. in the raw material, increased to 1.88 ⫾ 0.02 mg/100 g in
It has been stated that the level of thiobarbituric acid the plain sea bass marinades, and to 1.87 ⫾ 0.03 mg/100 g
(TBA), used to determine the rancidity of oil, should be in the sauced sea bass marinades, after maturation; and the
under 3 in a very good material, should not be more than difference between the groups was found to be statistically
5 in a good material and that rancidity occurs when TBA insignificant (P > 0.05). The changes in TMA-N in the plain
exceeds 4 mg MA/kg in fish meat; and that the consum- and in the sauced sea bass marinades during the storage
ability limit is between 7–8 mg MA/kg (Curran et al. 1980; period are shown in Fig. 3.
Varlık et al. 1993). In our study, while the TBA value was As can be seen in Fig. 3, the TMA-N values – which did
determined as 1.05 ⫾ 0.60 mg MA/kg in raw material, it not change significantly up to day 50 of the storage period –
was determined as 1.27 ⫾ 0.03 mg MA/kg in the plain
marinades and as 1.68 ⫾ 0.04 mg MA/kg in the sauced
marinades on day 0, when maturation was complete. It
was also seen that both of the marinades retained their
“very good” quality at the end of the storage period of
200 days.
Erdem et al. (2005) report that the TBA level in mari-
nated horse mackerel, which was 0.54 mg MA/kg in raw
material, reached 4.09 mg MA/kg on day 90 and was of
good quality, but reached 8.97 mg MA/kg on day 120, and
went bad. While the results of the study in question for day
90 support the results of the present study for day 80, some
inconsistencies between the TBA values at the end of the
storage period have been detected. In a marinade study
done on anchovy, it was reported that the TBA level was
1.65 mg MA/kg in the first week, and increased to 2.35 mg
MA/kg in the 10th week (Yapar 1998).
Sallam et al. (2007) found that the raw TBA level of
Pacific saury, marinated in different acid solutions, was FIG. 3. THE CHANGES IN TMA-N VALUES IN PLAIN AND SAUCED SEA
0.37 mg MA/kg, and they stressed the fact that it was of BASS MARINADES DURING STORAGE

1076 Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS

fell below the initial value on day 80 in both groups, and


increased steadily from that time onwards, reaching 2.81–
3.07 mg/100 g. In the statistical evaluation of the obtained
data, the difference between the groups was found to be
insignificant (P > 0.05) on days 0 and 15, but was significant
(P < 0.05) on days 30, 50, 80, 110, 140, 170 and 200.
Trimethylamine oxide (TMA-O), which naturally exists
in the muscles of fish, is a significant compound acting as
an osmoregulator. Although it is significant in sea products,
it is almost non-existent in freshwater products. TMA-O is
reduced to TMA-N with the effect of microorganisms in the
storage of water products and the trimethylaminemethylase
enzyme. TMA-N has a fishy smell, and it increases and
makes the smell stronger depending on the decomposition
level (Kietzman et al. 1969). Şengör (2000) states that the
TMA-N compound does not cause the fishy smell on its
own, and that it is only an agent that creates the smell, and
that the smell appears as a result of the TMA reacting with
the lipid in fish muscles. It has been reported that the TMA FIG. 4. THE CHANGES OF PEROXIDE NUMBER (POS MEQ/KG) IN
value in freshwater products was nearly 1 mg/100 g and PLAIN AND SAUCED SEA BASS MARINADES DEPENDING ON TIME
over 8 mg/100 g (FAO 1986) in samples that went bad. In
the quality classification of water products, in terms of the
TMA-N value, the products with a TMA value up to 4 mg/ not exceed 2 mg/100 g on days 30, 40 and 50; but, on day 90
100 g are classified as “good”; up to 10 mg/100 g, as (the last period of storage), it reached 8.37 in the group to
“marketable”; and up to 12 mg/100 g or above,as “bad” which 0% acid was applied, 5.52 in the group to which 2%
(Kundakçı 1989). It has been determined that both of the acid was applied, and 4.47 in the group to which 3% acid
marinades – either the raw material quality or the mari- was applied.
nades obtained from raw materials – are of good quality, In a study to determine the shelf life of marinated fish
according to the criteria mentioned above. Yapar (1998), in balls, Varlık et al. (2000) report that the TMA-N value of
his study investigating the quality changes in anchovy mari- 1.85 mg/100 g at the beginning of the storage increased to
nades, kept two different maturation solutions (group 2.85 mg/100 g on day 150. These results support the values
1–10% salt + 2% vinegar; group 2–15% salt + 2% vinegar) obtained on day 140 of our study. In a study by Kılınç and
for 10 weeks and determined the TMA-N value as 4.07 mg/ Çaklı (2005), the TMA-N values in pasteurized and unpas-
100 g in the first group and as 3.44 mg/100 g in the second teurized tomato-sauced sardine marinades at the beginning
group. These values correspond to day 80 of our study and of storage were recorded as 1.71 mg/100 g and 2.03 mg/
they do not overlap with the values in our study for our 100 g, respectively; and they reached 7.73 mg/100 g and
results for day 80. In their study investigating the changes 10.86 mg/100 g at the end of 6 months of storage. The TMA
during anchovy marinade production in different acid–salt level in fish changes and depends on factors such as season
concentrations, Aksu et al. (1997) – after maturing the and region of capture, species, muscle type and processing
marinades by using 2% acetic acid and 10% salt for group techniques (Herbard et al. 1982). Thus, we conclude that the
A, 4% acetic acid and 12% salt for group B, 6% acetic acid differences between the studies occur because of these
and 16% salt for group C, and packing the groups in sun- factors.
flower seed oil and storing them at 4C for 150 days – In our study, the peroxide number – determined
obtained the following TMA-N results: 4.37 mg/100 g in as 1.91 ⫾ 0.02 meq/kg in the raw material – increased to
group A; 3.70 mg/100 g in group B; and 3.60 mg/100 g in 1.85 ⫾ 0.16 meq/kg in the plain sea bass marinade, and to
group C. In their study to determine the chemical and orga- 1.81 ⫾ 0.23 meq/kg in the sauced sea bass marinade, after
noleptic characteristics of Pacific saury (Cololabis saira) maturation; and to 4.48 ⫾ 0.20 meq/kg in the sauced sea
marinated in a brine of 12% salt, or different solutions of bass marinade, and to 5.12 ⫾ 0.15 meq/kg in the plain sea
12% salt and 2% acetic acid, and 12% salt and 3% acetic bass marinade, at the end of storage. These results are under
acid, Sallam et al. (2007) obtained TMA-N values for the the deterioration limit level. The changes in the peroxide
groups, after marination, as 0.84, 0.69 and 0.72 mg/100 g number during storage in the plain and sauced sea bass
(0%, 2% and 3% acetic acid), respectively. They reported marinades are shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that the perox-
that the increase in the TMA-N level was quite slow and did ide number for the marinades packed as plain was higher

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1077
ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK

TABLE 2. THE SENSORY CHANGES OF MARINADES DURING STORAGE PERIOD

Appearance Flavor Texture


Storage
time (day) Sauced Plain Sauced Plain Sauced Plain
0 9.00 ⫾ 0.00 9.00 ⫾ 0.00 7.60 ⫾ 0.55 8.20 ⫾ 0.45 4.00 ⫾ 0.00 4.00 ⫾ 0.00
15 8.60 ⫾ 0.55 8.80 ⫾ 0.45 7.20 ⫾ 0.45 8.20 ⫾ 0.45 3.60 ⫾ 0.55 4.00 ⫾ 0.00
30 8.20 ⫾ 0.45 8.60 ⫾ 0.55 6.80 ⫾ 0.45 7.80 ⫾ 0.45 3.60 ⫾ 0.55 3.80 ⫾ 0.45
50 7.60 ⫾ 0.55 8.00 ⫾ 0.71 6.40 ⫾ 0.55 7.40 ⫾ 0.90 3.20 ⫾ 0.84 3.40 ⫾ 0.55
80 7.20 ⫾ 0.45 7.80 ⫾ 0.45 5.60 ⫾ 0.55 7.00 ⫾ 0.71 2.80 ⫾ 0.84 3.40 ⫾ 0.55
110 6.60 ⫾ 0.55 7.60 ⫾ 0.55 5.60 ⫾ 0.55 6.60 ⫾ 0.55 2.80 ⫾ 0.84 3.20 ⫾ 0.45
140 6.40 ⫾ 0.55 7.00 ⫾ 0.71 5.20 ⫾ 0.45 6.20 ⫾ 0.84 2.80 ⫾ 0.84 3.00 ⫾ 0.71
170 5.80 ⫾ 0.45 6.20 ⫾ 0.45 4.60 ⫾ 0.55 5.80 ⫾ 0.45 2.40 ⫾ 0.55 2.80 ⫾ 0.45
200 5.40 ⫾ 0.55 5.60 ⫾ 0.55 4.40 ⫾ 0.55 4.80 ⫾ 0.84 2.20 ⫾ 0.84 2.40 ⫾ 0.55

n = 5 (mean value ⫾ standard deviation).

than for the marinades packed as sauced from day 80 significant difference between the groups. However, depend-
onward; and the plain marinades had a steady increase, ing on the storage period in terms of the days, the statistical
while the sauced marinades had a nonstable change curve. difference in each group was meaningful (P < 0.01). Gener-
One of the first products that were formed in the oxida- ally, in terms of flavor, the plain sea bass marinades were
tion of unsaturated fatty acids is peroxide. Thus, the observed to be of “very good” quality from the beginning of
determination of peroxide formed in the initial phase of storage until day 80, and of “good” quality between days 110
rancidity is mostly used as an indicator of quality. The per- and 200. The sauced sea bass marinades were of “very good”
oxide number (POS), which is an indicator of oxidation in quality until day, and of “good” quality between days 30 and
fats, is a measure of the active oxygen level in fats and is 200. The average values obtained in terms of texture show
equivalent to a mill equivalent of peroxide oxygen found in that the plain sea bass marinades had proper tissue charac-
1 kg of fat (Yapar and Erdöl 1999). It is stated that, in a teristics up to day 170; however, the sauced sea bass mari-
high-quality material, the peroxide number should be nades retained their proper tissue characteristics until day
under 2 mmol O2/kg fat (= 4 meq/kg), and it should not be 140, and they were evaluated as “acceptable” from that time
more than 5 mmol O2/kgfat (= 10 meq/kg) in a good mate- until the end of storage. According to the statistical evalua-
rial; and its consumability limit is 10 mmol O2/kg fat tion of the texture changes, there is not a statistically
(= 20 meq/kg) [15]. meaningful difference between the plain and sauced sea bass
It can be seen that the peroxide numbers were under marinades. However, the periodic changes measured in both
5 mmol O2/kg fat (=10 meq/kg) in the plain and sauced sea of the groups are found to be statistically significant
bass marinades, and they had good material quality. (P < 0.01).
Olgunoğlu (2007) states that the POS value in anchovy
marinades showed variations during the 7-month storage
period, and the POS value he determined as 18.7 meq/kg at ACKNOWLEDGMENT
the end of storage is higher than the values in our study; but This study is a summary of Gülderen Kurt Kaya’s PhD
they are similar in that they are both within the consumable thesis. The Scientific Research Projects Administration Unit
limits. of Mersin University supported this research.

Sensory Evaluation REFERENCES


The total scores of the sensory analysis of both marinades AKSU, H., ERKAN, N., ÇOLAK, H., VARLIK, C., GÖKOĞLU,
and their quality are shown in Table 2. In terms of appear- N. and UĞUR, M. 1997. Some changes in anchovy marinades
ance, the plain sea bass marinades retained their “very during production in different acid-salt concentrations and
good” quality from the beginning of storage to day 140, and determination of shelf life. Yüzüncü Yıl Univ. J. Vet. Anim.
their “good” quality from day 170 until the end of storage. 8, 86–90.
However, the sauced sea bass marinades had “very good” ANTONACOPOULOS, N. and VYNCKE, W. 1989.
quality up to day 110, and “good” quality between days 140 Determination of volatile basic nitrogen in fish: A third
and 200. collaborative study by the West European Fish Technologists
According to the statistical evaluation of the flavor in the Association (WEFTA). Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. 189,
plain and sauced sea bass marinade groups, there was not a 309–316.

1078 Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
G.K. KAYA and Ö. BAŞTÜRK ORGANOLEPTIC, CHEMICAL CHANGES OF MARINE SEA BASS

AOAS. 1994. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the LUDORFF, W. and MEYER, V. 1973. Fish and Fisher Products,
American Oil Chemists Society, American Oil Chemists Paul Parey Verlag, Hamburg-Berlin, Germany.
Society, Champaign, IL. MATTISSEK, R., SHENGEL, F.M. and STEINER, G. 1988.
BLIGH, E. and DYER, W.J.A. 1959. Rapid method of total lipid Lebensmittel-Analytick, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
extraction and purification. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 37, MCLAY, B.R. 1972. Marinades. Torry Advisory Note No: 56.
911–917. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Torry Research
CONNELL, J.J. 1980. Control of Fish Quality, pp. 116–139, Station, Aberdeen.
Fishing New Books Ltd, Surrey, U.K. OLGUNOĞLU, I.A. 2007. Sensory chemical and microbiological
CURRAN, C.A., NICOLADIES, L., POULTER, R.G. and PORS, change of marinated anchovy (Engraulis engrasicholus). PhD
J. 1980. Spoilage of fish from Hongkong at different storage Thesis, Institute of Naural and Applied Sciences, University of
temperatures. Trop. Sci. 22, 367–382. Çukurova.
DOKUZLU, C. 2000. Shelf-life of the marinated local anchovies. ÖZDEN, Ö. and BAYGAR, T. 2003. The effect of different
J. Fac. Vet. Med. 19, 45–49. packaging methods on some quality criteria of marinated fish.
ERDEM, E.M., BILGIN, S. and ÇAĞLAK, E. 2005. Quality Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 27, 899–906.
changes of processed with marinade, brine and spice horse ÖZOĞLU, Y., ÖZOĞUL, F., OLGUNOĞLU, I.A. and KULEY, E.
mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) during storage. Ondokuz 2007. Bacteriological and biochemical assessment of
Mayıs Univ. J. Fac. Agric. 20(3), 1–6. marinating cephalopods, crustaceans and gastropoda during
ERKAN, N. and ÖZDEN, Ö. 2007. Proximate composition and 24 week of storage. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 59, 465–476.
mineral contents in aqua cultured sea bass (Dicentrarchus SALLAM, K.H.I., AHMED, A.M., ELGAZZAR, M.M. and
labrax), sea bream (Sparus aurata) analyzed by ICP-MS. Food ELDALY, E.A. 2007. Chemical quality and sensory attributes
Chem. 102, 721–725. of marinated Pacific saury (Cololabis saira) during vacuum
FAO. 1986. Food and Nutrition Paper Manuals of Food Quality packaged storage at 4 °C. Food Chem. 102, 1061–1070.
Control Food Analysis: Quality, Adulteration, and Tests of SCHENDERYUK, V. and BYOKOWSKY, P.J. 1990. Salting and
Identity, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United marinating of fish. In Seafood: Resources, Nutritional
Nations, Rome, Italy. Composition and Preservation (Z.E. Sikorski, ed.) CRC Press,
FUENTES, A., SEGOVIA, F.I., SERRA, A. and BARAT, M.J. Inc, Boca Raton, FL.
2009. Comparison of wild and culture sea bass (Dicentrarchus SCHORMULLER, J. 1968. Handbook of Food Chemistry (Band
labrax) quality. Food Chem. 119, 1514–1518. III/2), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heilderberg, New York.
GÖKOĞLU, N. 2002. Seafood Processing Technology, Water ŞENGÖR, G.F. 2000. Determination of freshness and chemical
Foundation Publications, İstanbul, Turkey. compositon of scad (Trachurus trachurus) stored in
GÖKOĞLU, N., CENGIZ, E. and YERLIKAYA, P. 2004. refrigerator. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 24, 187–193.
Determination of the shelf life of marinated sardine (Sardina TARLADGIS, B.G., WATTS, B.M., YOUNATHAN, M.S. and
pilchardus) stored at 4 °C. Food Control 15, 1–4. DUGAN, L. 1960. Distilation method for the quantitative
GÜLYAVUZ, H. and ÜNLÜSAYIN, M. 1999. Seafood Processing determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J. Am. Oil
Technology, Şahin Press, Ankara, Turkey. Chem. Soc. 37, 44–48.
HERBARD, C.E., FLICK, G.J. and MARTIN, R.E. 1982. VARLIK, C., UĞUR, M., GÖKOĞLU, N. and GÜN, H. 1993.
Occurrence and significance of trimethylamine oxide and its Principles and Methods of Quality Control in Seafood, Food
derivatives in fish and shellfish. Introduction to Fish Technology Association, İstanbul, Turkey.
Technology, 149–182. VARLIK, C., ERKAN, N., METIN, S., BAYGAR, T. and ÖZDEN,
HUSS, H.H. 1988. Fresh Fish Quality and Quality Changes, Food Ö. 2000. Determination of the shelf-life of marinated fish
and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, balls. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 24, 593–597.
Italy. VARLIK, C., ERKAN, N., ÖZDEN, Ö., MOL, S. and BAYGAR, T.
JAMES, C.S. 1995. Analytical Chemistry of Foods, Blackie 2004. Seafood Processing Technology, İstanbul University,
Academic & Professional, London, U.K. İstanbul, Turkey.
KIETZMAN, U., PRIEBE, K., RAKOU, D. and REICHSTEIN, K. VARLIK, C., ERKAN, N. and ÖZDEN, Ö. 2007. Basic Quality
1969. Seefischalslebensmittel, Paul Parey Verlag, Control for Seafood, İstanbul University, İstanbul, Turkey.
Hamburg-Berlin, Germany. YAPAR, A. 1998. Some quality changes in anchovy (Engraulis
KILINÇ, B. and ÇAKLI, Ş. 2005. Determination of the shelf life encrasicolus) marinades produced by using two different
of sardina (Sardina pilchardus) marinades in tomato sauce ripening solutions. Ege Univ. Turk. Fish. 15, 1–7.
stored at 4 °C. Food Control 16, 639–644. YAPAR, A. and ERDÖL, M. 1999. Changes in some properties of
KUNDAKÇI, A. 1989. The effect of preincubation conditions of whiting liver oil stored in a refrigerator. Turk. J. Vet. Anim.
gray mullet and blue fish to the quality. Ege Univ. J. Fish. Sci. 23, 333–336.
Aquat. Sci. 6, 23–24.

Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 38 (2014) 1072–1079 © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 1079

View publication stats

You might also like