You are on page 1of 1

NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS : NO.

OF DWELLING ROOMS : HOUSEHOLD DEMAND::


As per census 2011,
✓ Total population of our study area is 12,73,821 Number of dwelling rooms Total YEAR PRESENT NO. OF NO. OF SHORTAGE SHORTAGE OF
✓ Total household of our study area is 2,96,168. POPULATION EFFECTIVE PROJECTED HOUSING IN %
total rural urban
✓ The average household size of our study area is 4. HOUSING HOUSING
No exclusive room 6,429 5,512 917
2011 15,93,189 4,78,139 4,17,288 60,851 12.73
NO. OF HOUSEHOLDS OWNERSHIP STATUS: One room 1,11,724 98,649 13,075
2021 14,33,505 3,98,297 3,56,605 41,692 10.47
Permanen Two rooms 1,13,550 98,060 15,490
Permanent 2031 15,93,189 4,78,139 4,17,288 60,851 12.73
18% t
45% 45% Three rooms 37,860 26,976 10,884
7% 2041 17,52,873 5,57,980 4,77,971 80,009 14.34
Semi- 3+ rooms 26,359 20,388 5,971
Semi- 2051 19,12,557 6,37,822 5,38,654 99,168 15.55
74% permanen 0%
permanent
t 8.90% Table 5.4: Household projection.
10% 13% 38%
2% urban No Source: Self-analysis
Temporary Temporary
exclusive
13% INFERENCE:
room
• As we can observe the continuous shortage of houses in the 2011 census and
Fig.5.2 : showing the ownership status, urban Fig.5.2 : showing the ownership status, rural
38% 28% One room the projected decades as well.
Source: Census of India, 2011 Source: Census of India, 2011
24% • This problem can be solved through the implementation of PRADHAN MANTRI
AWAS YOJANA (PMAY) and BIJU PAKKA GHAR YOJANA.
Semi urban rural
Two rooms
permanen Permanent semi temporary permanent semi Temporary
t and
No exclusive room one room Two rooms
HOUSEHOLD PROJECTION:
permanent permanent Three rooms 3+ rooms 33%
Temporary
Fig.: showing the total number of dwellings as per the number of YEAR HOUSEHOLDS DECADAL GROWTH
Houses rooms
Source: Census of India, 2011 1991 1,74,556
anugul 34,470 3,291 8,294 112,326 24,064 112,416 2% rural no
(74.39%) (7.1%) (17.9%) (45.01%) (9.64%) (45.04%) INFERENCE: According to the overall values exclusive 2001 2,30,711 32.17%
8% room
of number of dwellings, the residences 2011 2,95,922 28.27%
total Permanent Semi-permanent temporary having the two rooms dwelling and one 11% one room
2021 3,56,605 20.51%
room dwelling are nearly equal and the 40%
146,796 (49.61%) 27,355 (9.24%) 120,710 (40.79%) most in numbers. 2031 4,17,288 17.12%
Mostly people using one room or two room 2041 4,77,971 14.54%
Table5.2 : showing the percentage of dwelling rooms two room
Source: census of India, 2011 facilities rather than three room or more
39% 2051 5,38,654 11.27%
INFERENCE: than three rooms facilities urban as well as
• We can observe from the above data, overly there are more no. of permanent in rural areas too. Table 5.4: Household decadal growth.

house, which implies the living conditions is quite better. Mostly people are providing with prdhan Source: Self-analysis

• But still there are more no. of temporary houses than semi-permanent, which mantry awas yojana and Indira gandgi Table5.2 : showing the percentage of dwelling rooms
awsa yojana .
Indira Awas Yojana
no. of households
denotes mainly the workers and migrants. Source: census of India, 2011
600000 538654
477971
MATERIALS USED BY HOUSEHOLDS FOR ROOF, WALL AND FLOOR: 400000
356605
417288
295922
Grass/Bamboo/Mud 200000 230711
MATERIAL OF WALL MATERIAL OF WALL Grass/ Thatch/ MATERIAL OF FLOOR etc.
174556

Mud 0.18% Bamboo etc. 0


0.05% 6% Plastic/ Polythene 1991 2001 2011 2021 2031 2041 2051
1.01% Plastic/ Polythene
0.88% Wood/ Bamboo 0% 0.18%
Mud/ INFERENCE: from the above graph we can see the decadal growth is much more in
Unburnt brick
Burnt Brick Wood
22.45% the year of 20111 and it is 32.17%. In the year of 2051 the decadal growth of the
Hand made Tiles
45% district will be the least as per the projection it will be 11 %.
47.46% Stone 49.22% 39% Stone not packed 8.41%
50% with mortar
Cement Stone packed with Machine made Tiles
COOKING FACILITIES:
mortar 14.41% 8%
G.I./ Metal/
Mosaic/ Floor tiles
Asbestos sheets
1.06% COOKING INSIDE HOUSE COOKING OUTSIDE HOUSE NO
Burnt Brick
Burnt brick Has kitchen Doesn’t have kitchen has kitchen doesn’t have kitchen COOKING
Any other material 0.24%
0.08% 0.92% Concrete 0% 187,425 47,419 (16.02%) 30,908 29,142 (9.85%) 1,028
2.05% Stone/Slate
1% 0% 1.71% (63.34%) (10.44%) (0.35%)
0.41% Any other material
Total= 79.36% Total=20.29%

INFERENCE: 50% OF PEOPLE USING wood or bamboo INFERENCE: around 40% of people using unburnt or INFERENCE: 45% of people using polythene and plastics. Table5.2 : showing the cooking facilities according to the number of house holds
materials for the building of walls as well as 45% of 15 5 of people using machine made tiles . Avoiding the
Source: census of India, 2011
mud bricks for the constr. We should promote to use
people using cements .Cement is a binder, a burnt bricks for more durability of the houses .mud use of plastics and less use of the plastics by promoting INFERENCE:
substance that sets and hardens independently, and brick may tend to erode under rain impact; absorption the use of tiles. It also more durable and affordable for As there are about 80% houses having inside house cooking, which is quite good but
can bind other materials together.as people are using of water causes swelling of mud brick, while people to use it properly .8& of people using hand at the same time it can pollute the inner house atmosphere. so, there should be
woods for their building construction, soft wood, so evaporation of water from the mud brick gives rise to made tiles according to their affordability. 10 & of cross ventilation or availability of chimney in the kitchen.
scratches and dents are an all too real possibility. shrinkage and cracking; people using burnt bricks. Around 20% people using outside cooking facilities for their affordability.

SHEET NO. - SCALE: N.T.S


ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN(ANUGUL) SUBMITTED TO:
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AS A
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING PART OF PLANNING STUDIO - VII
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, HOUSING SUBMITTED BY REMARKS:
TECHNO CAMPUS, GHATIKIA, BHUBANESWAR

You might also like