The additions to Trucks 1 and 2 will be capitalized and depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The engine overhaul on Truck 2 will extend its useful life by 3 years, so depreciation will be recalculated over the new 9 year life. No change needs to be made to Truck 3.
Specifically for Truck 1, the $4,500 hydraulic lift will be added to the initial cost of $22,500 and depreciated over the remaining 3 years. For
The additions to Trucks 1 and 2 will be capitalized and depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The engine overhaul on Truck 2 will extend its useful life by 3 years, so depreciation will be recalculated over the new 9 year life. No change needs to be made to Truck 3.
Specifically for Truck 1, the $4,500 hydraulic lift will be added to the initial cost of $22,500 and depreciated over the remaining 3 years. For
The additions to Trucks 1 and 2 will be capitalized and depreciated over their remaining useful lives. The engine overhaul on Truck 2 will extend its useful life by 3 years, so depreciation will be recalculated over the new 9 year life. No change needs to be made to Truck 3.
Specifically for Truck 1, the $4,500 hydraulic lift will be added to the initial cost of $22,500 and depreciated over the remaining 3 years. For
Short Cases Follow the instruction given on the ff. cases. Financial statement versus tax depreciation CASE 1 The following is an excerpt from a conversation between two employees of WXT Technologies, Nolan Sears and Stacy Mays. Nolan is the accounts payable clerk, and Stacy is the cashier. Nolan: Stacy, could I get your opinion on something? Stacy: Sure, Nolan. Nolan: Do you know Rita, the fixed assets clerk? Stacy: I know who she is, but I don't know her very well. Why? Nolan: Well, I was talking to her at lunch last Monday about how she liked her job. you know, the usual; and she mentioned something about having to keep two sets of books one for taxes and one for the financial That can’t be good accounting, can it? What do you think? Stacy: Two sets of books? It doesn't sound right. Nolan: It doesn't seem right to me either was always taught that you had to use generally accepted accounting principles. How can there be two sets of books? What can be the difference between the two? How would you respond to Nolan and Stacy if you were Rita? Improvements and repairs. If I were Rita I would like to inform Nolan and Stacy that as an accounting clerk with experience in numerous audit and accounting job descriptions, I can tell you that keeping two sets of books is perfectly legal and normal. Each firm or group of firms' functional currency, account structure, and accounting calendar are determined by a set of books. Set up one additional set of books for each reporting currency if you need to report on your account balances in several currencies. The idea behind maintaining two sets of books is for publicly traded corporations to be able to prepare financial statements for the US Securities and Exchange Commission, investors, and, on occasion, the Internal Revenue Service. This is viewed as a benefit because it demonstrates to investors that they are a wealthy corporation. One set of books is for the financial statements that they present to shareholders when they file their quarterly reports with the U.S. SEC, and that set is prepared according to GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles). The other set is the books they keep to pay their taxes to the IRS. Keeping two sets of books for business is a totally typical and legal approach to prepare for an audit. Due to the significant differences in financial and tax reporting, keeping two sets of books will allow organizations to avoid having to reconcile two standards in a hurry. To react to any audit queries or assessments, they only need to prepare what is contained in the appropriate books. In addition, the amount of depreciation expense a corporation is allowed to take on its equipment is one of the most prevalent discrepancies between one book for financial GAAP and two books for tax purposes (IRS). Companies, for the most part, attempt to follow the "matching principle" when it comes to hiring. monetary accounting. In other words, they strive to match when revenue is earned with when expenses are incurred expensed. This matching helps them plan for capital expenditures in the future. On the other hand, government, for tax purposes, doesn't much care for "generally accepted" and is often only concerned with what actually happened. Therefore, depreciation expenses for them is not a deductible expense every year since it was deducted already when it was acquired. CASE 2 Miss U PH owns three delivery trucks. Details for each truck at the end of the most recent year follow: Expected Accumulated Age Useful Life Initial Cost Depreciation Truck 1 3 6 $22,500 $11,250 Truck 2 5 6 26,250 21,875 Truck 3 2 6 281500 9,500 At the beginning of the year, a hydraulic lift is added to Truck 1 at a cost of $4,500. The addition of the hydraulic lift will allow’s the company to deliver much larger objects than could previously be delivered. At the beginning of the year, the engine of Truck 2 is overhauled at a cost of $5,000. The engine overhaul will extend the truck's useful life by three years. Write a short memo to Miss U's chief financial officer explaining the financial statement effects of the expenditures associated with Trucks 1 and 2. (below)