Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • IPE Template Concept Map

    Uploaded by

    edric
    21 views9 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    21 views9 pages

    IPE Template Concept Map

    Uploaded by

    edric

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 9

    New Era University

    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Bridgette Magcale
    Rating/Score:  50   

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Christian Lapada
    Rating/Score:  50   

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Darlene Gregorio
    Rating/Score:   48  

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Franco Escosura
    Rating/Score:   45  

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Jocelyn Goyon
    Rating/Score:   46  

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Kay Inovejas
    Rating/Score:   48  

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Lawrence Fong
    Rating/Score:  48   

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Shane Immaculata
    Rating/Score:     

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature
    New Era University
    College of Nursing

    Overall Peer Evaluation Tool

    Name: Edric Fernan Gabot


    Date: 09/16/2021
    Section/Group: CON1-A/GROUP 3
    Subject/Activity: CONAP-18/CONCEPT MAP
    Name of Student for Evaluation: Zjhay Duque
    Rating/Score:   49  

    Instruction: Give the appropriate rating for each item based on the given
    NUMERICAL RATING

    NUMERICA QUANTITATIVE DESCRIPTION


    L
    RATING
    5 Outstanding Carries out expected behavior in a very
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision.
    4 Very satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    consistent manner with minimal
    guidance and supervision
    3 Satisfactory Carries out expected behavior in a
    moderately consistent manner with
    frequent guidance and supervision
    2 Needs Improvement Carries out expected behavior in a
    rarely consistent manner with close
    guidance and supervision
    1 Unsatisfactory Doesn’t carry out expected behavior
    even under close guidance and
    supervision

    Competencies 1 2 3 4 5
    1. Initiative to work. /
    2. Performs assigned task willingly. /
    3. Accepts responsibility beyond assigned work. /
    4. Submits work on time. /
    5. Submits quality work. /
    6. Accepts constructive criticism. /
    7. Relates well with peers. /
    8. Able to share ideas. /
    9. Attendance/punctuality in group activities. /
    10. Participates actively in group activities. /
    Remarks:
    ________________________________________________________________________
    ________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________
    Student’s Signature

    You might also like