Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Of C-Sii I.: Raman Spectra K
Of C-Sii I.: Raman Spectra K
caused by the MBE-growth process was directly responsi- scattering by optic phonons associated with Si-Si motion
ble for these peaks, although they noted the observation in the nearest neighborhood of several Ge atoms is re-
of similar weak peaks in the Raman spectra of bulk poly- sponsible for these weak extra Raman peaks.
crystalline Si&
G-e„alloys. '
Recently, we have described the growth of single- II. SAMPLE PREPARATION
crystal Si, Ge alloy layers on Si(111) substrates by AND EXPERIMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
liquid-phase epitaxy (LPE), where the crystals are grown
from a saturated Si-Ge-In solution by slow cooling. In The three c-Si& Ge /Si(111) (x =0. 28, 0.55, and
contrast to MBE, the LPE-growth process always takes 0.77) samples used in this study were grown from Si-Ge-
I
' I
C
a 0 ' I
t I
(b) (
Ge-Ge x =0.55
O 1O— (
Si-Ge
200 &00 4OO 500
Wave Number (cm ') Si-Si
FIG. 1. Raman spectra measured at room temperature in
two different backscattering configurations in a LPE-grown
Sio»Geo28/Si (111) layer. The crystal axes x, y, and z are
defined as x(([1, 1,0], y(~[1, 1, 2], and z(([1, 1, 1]. The Raman-
intensity scale is linear.
1
man measurements were performed at room temperature 200 300 400 500
in the backscattering configuration. Spectra were taken Wave Number (cm ')
for incident and scattered light polarized both parallel or
perpendicular to each other. The depolarization ratio is FIG. 2. Raman spectra measured for three single-crystal
roughly 2:3, as shown in Fig. 1 for a sample with Si, „Ge alloy layers grown by liquid-phase epitaxy with the
x =0.28, which corresponds to the selection rules for dia- following compositions: (a) x = 0. 28, (b) x = 0. 55, and (c)
mond, ' except for the low-frequency part of the spec- x =0.77. Arrows denote the weak extra Raman peaks.
trum. This behavior is characteristic for all the investi-
gated compositions. The spectra were excited with the with an isodisplacement model. "
In addition to these
514.5-nm line of an Ar+ laser. The scattered light was peaks, each spectrum contains one or more weak contri-
dispersed in a triplemate spectrometer and detected by butions between 420 and 470 cm '. These contributions
optical multichannel techniques with a spectral resolu- are best resolved (into peaks centered at 428 and 446
tion of 5 cm cm ', and a weak shoulder at 468 cm ') for x =0. 55 [see
Fig. 2(b)]. Only three modes were obtained in Ref. 16 be-
III. RESULTS OF THE RAMAN MEASUREMENTS
In Fig. 2 we present the unpolarized room-temperature TABLE I. Peak frequencies for the main Raman-active
modes measured for LPE-grown single-crystal Si& Ge alloy
Raman spectra of LPE-grown single crystal layers of
layers for the three compositions x =0.28, 0.55, and 0.77. The
Si „Ge /Si for three representative compositions correspond to the observed
&
weak peaks given in parentheses
x =0.28, 0.55, and 0.77. Peak positions for these three shoulder close to the Si-Si peak. The frequencies are in units of
compositions are given in Table I. Each spectrum is cm
characterized by three dominant peaks centered near 300,
400, and 500 cm '. These correspond to scattering from Ge-Ge Si-Ge Si-Si Weak peaks
— —
optic phonons involving Ge Ge, Si Ge, and Si Si — 0.28 287 404 502 247, 430
stretching motions, respectively. The origin of these
peaks is well understood, and their frequency depen- 0.55 290 407 482 428, 446 (468)
dence as a function of composition has been calculated' 0.77 295 404 468 424, 443 (459)
10 058 M. I. ALONSO AND K. WINER 39
cause only three independent coordinates were con- peak at 247 cm '. In our (111)-oriented samples this
sidered. low-energy structure is only observable for parallel polar-
The peak frequencies above 390 cm ' of the LPE- izations of incident and scattered light, and it disappears
grown single-crystal Si& Ge alloy layers are compared almost completely for crossed polarizations, as shown in
to those of bulk polycrystalline Si& „Ge„alloys as a Fig. t. , which indicates that the corresponding Raman
function of Ge content x in Fig. 3. The fact that the fre- tensor has predominantly I, symmetry. ' The selection
quency dependence on x for both sets of samples is the rules for Raman scattering in compositionally disordered
same shows that the former alloy layers are free of strain. c-SiGe alloys need not be the same as in c-Si or c-Ge.
The Si-Si peak frequency varies linearly with composition However, the decomposition of the Raman spectrum of
—
(cps; s;-520 70x ), while the Si-Ge peak frequency varies c-Sio 7Geo 3/Si( 100) into its diFerent symmetry com-
slowly over most of the composition range, in agreement ponents is similar to that for c-Si and c-Ge, ' suggesting
with previous results. " We believe that the nonlinearity that diamond-structure selection rules are essentially
of the Si-Si peak versus x observed in Refs. 4 and 17 is preserved in c-Si, Ge„alloys. Therefore, we conclude
due to the proximity of a weak peak, stronger than the that the feature at 247 cm ' in Fig. 1(a) is due in part to
Si-Si peak for x &0. 75. The three weak extra peaks second-order Raman scattering (I, as opposed to I"25
display similar behavior; the highest-frequency peak symmetry in first order), although both weak I z5 and
(-460 cm ') tracks the Si-Si frequency over most of its disorder-induced I first-order contributions cannot be
&
limited range while the lowest-frequency weak peak entirely ruled out.
(-430 cm ) varies slowly with x, like the Si-Ge peak. The features in Fig. 2(a), including the additional weak
The compositional dependence of the third weak-peak peaks, are virtually identical to those for the 20% Ge
frequency is an average of the latter two. This similarity MBE-grown single epitaxial layer of c-Si, Ge /Si mea-
suggests that the -430- and -460-cm
' weak extra
sured by Lockwood et al. Thus, their claim that weak
peaks are related to (or derived from) the Si-Ge and Si-Si long-range order is directly responsible for the additional
phonon bands, respectively. peaks in the Raman spectrum at 250 and 430 cm ' can-
There is only one additional peak between 420 and 470 not be correct; the equilibrium LPE-growth process pre-
cm ' in the Raman spectrum for x=0. 28 centered at cludes such long-range order. The presence of similar ad-
430 cm ' [see Fig. 2(a)]. A weak shoulder marked by a
dashed arrow seems to be present, but it is not clearly
resolved. There is also an additional weak feature at 247
ditional peaks in the Raman spectra of polycrystalline
Si, Ge bulk alloys has been previously observed, ' '
but their origin has not yet been established. Brya pro-
cm ' which has been previously observed in bulk poly- posed that these minor peaks are local (resonant) modes
crystalline Si, Ge alloys and has been attributed to a of Si(Ge) impurities in the Ge-(Si-) rich alloys. Lannin
resonant mode. ' Measurements as a function of alloy suggested that the 200 —250-cm ' peak is a resonant
composition show that the observed peak is a composite mode for x 0. 4, while for higher Ge contents its charac-
peak. While for Ge-rich alloys two separate broad peaks ter changes to disorder-induced LA scattering. A simple,
around 170 cm ' (2TA) (Ref. 18) and 200 cm ' are ob- though realistic, lattice-dynamics calculation can resolve
served, in the range of compositions x =0. 15 to 0.40 the the question of the origin of these additional peaks.
two peaks overlap, giving rise to the apparently sharp
IV. MODELING THE RAMAN SPECTRA
We use a 216-atom cubic supercell (ao = 16.2813 A) of
I I 1 l I I I I
Si in the diamond structure and randomly replace Si
atoms by Ge ones until the desired composition is
500- achieved. In this way we obtain nearly perfect random
E distributions of Si and Ge atoms in the supercell; that is,
in all the studied cases the probability of occurrence of
— — —
Si Si, Si Ge, and Ge Ge bonds in the supercell is
v) 450- close to (1 — 2x(1 —
x), x), and x, respectively. For ex-
C ample, in the supercell generated for x =0. 50 we found
U the probabilities 0.243, 0.514, and 0.243, instead of 0.25,
E
U 0.50, and 0.25 in the ideally random case. Because of the
CL
diff'erence in ideal-crystal bond lengths (rs; s; /r G, o,
400- Si- =2. 35/2. 46) or, equivalently, lattice constants, we allow
the cubic unit cell to adjust its shape by varying the three
0.2 0.4
I
0.6
I I I
0.8
1
FIG. 3. Positions of the weak peaks observed between 420 nates of the 216 atoms to relax to their minimum Keating
and 470 cm ' in LPE single-crystal and bulk polycrystalline potential-energy configuration. We choose that set of
Si& Cie alloys as a function of Ge content x. The feature lattice constants whose relaxed configuration has the
close to the Si-Si peak (-460 cm ') is observed as a shoulder lowest Keating potential energy for the final structure
that becomes larger than this peak for x & 0. 75. The solid lines and repeat this procedure for all three (x =0.28, 0.55,
are drawn as a guide to the eye. and 0.77) Ge concentrations. We further employ the
39 RAMAN SPECTRA OF c-Si& „Ge ALLOYS 10 059
Keating potential to construct and diagonalize the itative agreement between the calculated and measured
dynamical matrix and thereby obtain the k=O phonon Raman spectrg. Even the weak additional Raman peaks
density of states and eigenvectors for each composition. between 420 and 470 cm ' are clearly present in the cal-
We use the following force constants: as; s;=39.5 N/m, culated spectra, except for the highest Ge concentration,
ao, G, =35.0 N/m, and P/a=0. 285 (Ref. 21) for all bond where they are either too weak to be observed or masked
pairs, the former two being fitted to reproduce the single by neighboring peaks. The Raman spectra above the Si-
LO-TO Raman mode in c-Ge and c-Si at 301 and 520 Ge peak are essentially given by the phonon density of
cm ', respectively. The force constants a give essentially states. The calculated peak positions differ slightly from
the elastic energy due to changes in bond lengths, while p the measured ones, but this could be remedied by adjust-
takes into account changes in bond angles. Both es; z, ing several available free parameters in the Keating mod-
and rs; z, are taken to be the geometric mean of the cor- el (i.e., Ps;o, s;, Ps;s;o„etc.) for a more quantitative fit.
responding pure crystalline values. Finally, we calculate However, this is not necessary to prove that first-order
the first-order Raman spectrum for each structure by ap- Raman processes in compositionally random c-Sii Ge„
plying the following phenomenological model for the alloys are sufticient to account for the extra weak peaks
three independent components of the Raman polarizabili-
ty due to Alben et al. ,
N 4
al X g (rii
1=ii =1
rli I/3)ni rii
(a) si, „Ge„
N 4
a, = x=0.28
gy
1=1
[ —(ri; 'ui+ ui ri; ) I/3]ui 'ri;, (2)
30™
N 4
a, = g g Iui 'rh
1=1
where X is the number of atoms, u& the eigenvector of
atom I for a given vibrational mode, I the unit dyadic,
and rl; the unit bond vector from atom I to atom i. The
tensor a1 corresponds to changes in the polarizability due N
to pure stretching motions and gives rise to the sole first- t- ) 0 (b) x=0.55
order Raman peak in c-Si at 520 cm ', whereas o.2 and
(x3 vanish in the case of perfectly symmetric tetrahedral
0O Si-Ge
bonding. In our case, the departure from tetrahedral Ge-Ge
symmetry is small, and, therefore, we expect a1 to be the
dominant mechanism. We define the Raman intensity for St-Sl-
each eigenmode as
%co
—, .. .
n+1, (a. +a. .+a„,), (4)
where one or more neighbors of either Si atom are re- Thus the frequency coo=520 cm ' in pure c-Si should be
placed by Ge atoms. The larger mass of the neighboring reduced by a factor of 0.87 to 450 cm ', in reasonable
Ge atom(s) should decrease the force constant that deter- agreement with the calculated value of 468 cm ' for the
—
mines the Si Si stretching frequencies, thus pulling nearly ideal eigenmode depicted in Fig. 5.
modes out of the pure Si LO-TO band to lower frequen- The frequency of similar Si-Si Raman-active modes
cies. This effect should also contribute to the gradual should decrease with one, two, or three Ge neighbors
reduction in the frequency of the Si-Si phonon band max- from 520 cm ' to 486, 450, and 411 cm ', respectively,
imum with increasing Ge content. within this idealized model. The observed decrease in
In Fig. 5 we present a specific example of this behavior frequency of the Si-Si peak maximum with increasing Ge
where we show the atomic motions for the mode with content is due in part to the statistical effect of an in-
m=468 cm ' calculated for the c-Sio45Geo &5 alloy. This creasing average number of Ge neighbors per Si atom,
mode provides the main contribution to the central weak which reduces the mean frequency of the Si-Si Raman-
extra Raman peak for this Ge concentration [see. Fig. active modes. The resulting shift of the Si-Si Raman
4(b)). The central Si atom vibrates mainly in the z direc- peak to lower frequencies with increasing Ge content in
tion while its two Si neighbors move along the bond random c-Si& „Ge alloys by this mechanism is related
directions. The two Ge atoms execute much smaller to phonon-confinement (localization) effects which have
motions (4% of the central atom). Similar eigenmodes been invoked to explain such shifts in short-period c-
are observed at nearly the same frequency in the two oth- Si, Ge superlattices. Of course, the idealized model
er compositions as well. The resulting lower frequency discussed above ignores structural changes and changes
can be understood with the following idealized model. in force constants as the composition is varied. These
We assume that only the silicon atoms move and that the effects contribute only slightly to the frequency shifts
germanium atoms are fixed (ms;/mo, ~0). The eigen- with composition; the difference in force constants
frequency cu is then determined by the effective stretching [as;o, /as;s;=&(35. 0)(39.5)/39. 5=0.94] is much small-
force constant ~; for each bond and the mass of Si, m&;. er than the difference in atomic masses ( m s; /m o,
In the case that the central Si has four Si neighbors, ~o =0. 39).
would be given by Not all of the normal modes that make up the weak
Raman peaks between 420 and 470 cm ' are as simple
and symmetric as the one depicted in Fig. 5. However,
the origin of all of these weak extra peaks is the same.
Namely, that random introduction of Ge atoms into an
L111j L111] initially pure Si crystal reduces the local symmetry,
L0013 which leads to the localization of Si-Si optic phonons
(phonon confinement) in the Ge neighborhoods. The fre-
quencies of these modes are reduced through the effect of
the larger Ge mass, which pulls modes out of the main
~G Si-Si optic-phonon band to lower frequencies. Our re-
sults confirm the interpretation of Brya for dilute Ge:Si
0 5' alloys, except that the origin of the weak peaks is the
same for the entire compositional range. These effects
depend upon the presence of disorder and should not be
operative in an ordered SiGe alloy.
The interpretation of the low-frequency weak Raman
[:111j peak observed at 247 cm ' for x =0.28 is complicated by
the possible overlap of the 2TA second-order scattering
peak (at 240 cm ' for this composition' with a
FIG. 5. Schematic normal-mode displacements for x =0.55 disorder-induced first-order scattering I,
contribution.
and co=468 cm ' as described in the text. Open circles depict However, at compositions x &0. 65 we observe a clear
Si, solid circles Ge. separation of this peak into components centered near
39 RAMAN SPECTRA OF e-Si& „Ge„ALLOYS 10 061
170 cm ' [2TA (Ref. 18)] and 200 cm ', which agrees C:
40 l
unit cell has axes (a/2)[110], (a/2)[011), and a[101], 100 200 300 400 500 600
and contains two Si and two Ge atoms. We have con- Wave Number (cm ')
structed a supercell of 64 atoms corresponding to 16 of
these primitive unit cells and have calculated the frequen- FIG. 7. Rarnan spectrum calculated for the ordered c-
cies and the eigenvectors for the relaxed coordinates. Sio,OGeo alloy. Representative
50 eigenvectors for the four
Rarnan-acitve modes are also shown. Calculated peak positions
There are four symmetry-allowed Raman-active modes
for a random c-Si05OGeo, o alloy are marked by arrows. The
which occur at 84, 281, 426, and 483 cm ', as shown in
Raman-intensity units are the same as in Fig. 4.
Fig. 7. Eigenvectors for the four modes are also shown
schematically in Fig. 7. The modes consist of phonons
with atomic motions either along (281 and 483 cm ') or
perpendicular to (84 and 426 cm ') the (111)directions. No additional weak peaks are allowed in the perfectly
The Raman spectrum for a c-Sio 5Geo 5 random alloy ordered structure. The reduced frequency of the Si Si —
also contains three dominant peaks whose calculated fre- stretching mode to 483 cm ' is due to the same
quencies are shown by arrows in Fig. 7. The superlattice confinement effect caused by the much larger mass of the
peak at 281 cm ' cannot be identified with the peak at Ge atoms that gives rise to the weak extra Raman peaks
247 crn ' in Fig. 1 because of its observed polarization in the random alloys. No other peaks near this frequency
dependence. We must also note that the peaks calculated are possible because each and every Si atom has three Ge
in the Raman spectrum of the ordered structure are neighbors. If deviations from perfect ordering are
higher than their random-alloy counterparts [compare present, additional weak Raman peaks appear as the
with Fig. 4(b)]. The integrated Raman intensity in both average number of Ge neighbors per Si atom is reduced
cases is about the same, but in the disordered (random) from three. Thus the presence of weak extra Raman
alloys it is spread over many modes that are hence peaks in the spectrum is the signature for compositional
broader and of reduced height. A similar effect in the cx, di'sorder and localization rather than long-range order,
Raman inten'sity [Eq. (1)] due to disorder from that in and their relative intensity should provide a useful mea-
perfect diamond-structure Si crystal also occurs in the sure of order for the characterization of c-SiGe alloys.
pure amorphous Si phase. ~
The interpretation of the Raman spectrum for a c-SiGe
alloy with a mixture of a random plus a long-range-
ordered phase has to take into account that the random
phase gives rise to weak extra peaks. The fact that the in-
tensities of the weak extra Rarnan peaks between 420 and
c a c u a)ed
I I 470 cm ' in MBE-grown c-Si, „Ge„/Si superlattices
J3
whose electron-diffraction patterns exhibit extra reAec-
'o. iso o.ss Ge-Ge
C
0
tions and those in LPE-grown c-Si&, Ge„/Si alloys or
bulk c-Si, Ge alloys grown from a melt ' are nearly'
V I
I
identical suggests that long-range ordering in the former,
I
I if it exists at all, must be extremely weak.
~ +re 5 I
I
M I
V. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
I
I
x 70 I
I
The original claim for a long-range-ordering transition
in MBE-grown c-Si, Ge /Si strained-layer superlat-
tices by Qurmazd and Bean was based primarily on the
observation of extra reQections in the electron-diffraction
0 patterns of these structures after certain annealing
)00 200 300 schedules. Because annealing was critical to the onset of
ordering, Ourmazd and Bean suggested that the transi-
Wave Number (em ') tion might be strain driven. Lockwood et al. used
FIG. 6. Raman spectrum calculated for a random c- dark-field imaging and electron diffraction to observe the
Si045Geo» alloy, showing the totally polarized part a3 in com- same extra reAections in similar materials further sup-
parison to the dominant contribution a &. porting this claim. However, Lockwood et al. also ob-
10 062 M. I. ALONSO AND K. WINER 39
served this behavior in a single 1-pm-thick epitaxial layer Our results not oniy remove secondary support for
and failed to observe any dependence of these extra the claim of a long-range-ordering transition in c-
refiections on annealing conditions. The former result Si, Ge /Si alloys, but they are apparently contradicto-
rules out strain as the driving mechanism for the order- ry with previous results of Raman and electron-
disorder transition while the latter places the very ex- difFraction experiments (Ref. 3). Further work is needed
istence of this transition in some doubt. Lastly, Lock- to reconcile all observations: We suggest that a convinc-
wood et aI. suggested that the weak extra Raman peaks ing test of the presence of nearly ideal long-range order-
observed in their c-SiGe/Si superlattices and e-SiGe sin- ing in c-Si, Ge /Si superlattices or alloys would be to
gle epilayer were signatures of the long-range ordering in- measure the Raman spectrum for an alloy structure
ferred from the electron-diffraction patterns of these which exhibits very strong forbidden reAections in its
same alloys. electron-difFraction pattern. In such a material, any ex-
In the present study we have shown that LPE-grown tra weak peaks between 420 and 470 cm ' in the Raman
SiGe single-crystal layers as well as SiGe bulk polycrys- spectrum of the ordered c-SiQ 5GeQ 5 structure must be
tals, where long-range order is precluded by the dwarfed by the dominant Raman-allowed optic modes,
quasiequilibrium growth conditions, also exhibit the same and therefore the resulting Raman spectrum should be
weak extra Raman peaks observed in the Raman spectra unlike any Raman spectrum of a c-SiQ 5GeQ 5 alloy hereto-
,
of the MBE-grown c-Si, Ge„/Si structures in which fore measured.
long-range ordering was inferred by Lockwood et al. We
have shown that these extra peaks are present in compo- A.CKNOWLEDGMKNTS
sitionally random alloys and are composed of localized
Si-Si optic modes whose frequencies are lowered because
of the larger mass of neighboring Ge atoms. We have We thank M. Cardona for many enlightening discus-
also shown that the superposition of spectra of random sions and a critical reading of the manuscript. One of us
and ordered c-SiGe phases is neither required nor able to (K.W. ) thanks the Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
account for the weak extra Raman peaks observed in all (Federal Republic of Germany) for generous financial
c-Sl& Ge alloys, independent of the growth method. support.
*Present address: Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, 3333 Coy- 31, 2561 (1985).
ote Hill Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304. t3A. Qtejsh, N. Motta, and A. Balzarotti, in Proceedings of the
J. C. Bean, Science 230, 127 (1985). 19th International Conference on Physics and Semiconduc-
2A. Ourmazd and J. C. Bean, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 765 {1985). tors {unpublished).
D. J. Lockwood, K. Rajan, E. W. Fenton, J.-M. Baribeau, and J. P. Dismukes, L. Ekstrom, and R. J. Paff, J. Phys. Chem. 68,
M. W. Denhoff, Solid State Commun. 61, 465 (1987). 3021 (1964).
4M. A. Renucci, J. B. Renucci, and M. Cardona, in Light ' M. Cardona, in Light Scattering in Solids II, Vol. 50 of Topics
Scattering in Solids, edited by M. Balkanski (Flammarion, in Applied Physics, edited by M. Cardona and G. Guntherodt
Paris, 1971), p. 326. {Springer, Berlin, 1982), p. 19.
5W. J. Brya, Solid State Commun. 12, 253 (1973). G. M. Zinger, I. P. Ipatova, and A. V. Subashiev, Fiz. fekh.
M. I. Alonso and E. Bauser, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4445 (1987). Poluprovodn. 11, 656 (1977) [Sov. Phys. — Semicond. 11, 383
7A. Qteish and R. Resta, Phys. Rev. B 37, 1308 (1988). (1977)].
sM. Hansen and K. Anderko, Constitution of Binary Alloys, 2nd J. S. Lannin,
Phys. Rev. B 16, 1510 (1977).
ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958), p. 774. R. A. Logan, J. M. Rowell, and F. A. Trumbore, Phys. Rev.
S. Minomura, K. Tsuji, M. Wakagi, T. Ishidate, K. Inoue, and 136, A1751 {1964).
M. Shibuya, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 594460, 541 (1983). This M. I. Alonso (unpublished). The (100) orientation allows a
study was carried out using c-Si, Ge„obtained by annealing larger variety of polarization configurations to be measured
of a-Si& Ge films. Such films crystallize by annealing than the (111)orientation.
without segregation, as shown by A. Morimoto, M. Kumeda, P. N. Keating, Phys. Rev. 145, 637 (1966).
and T. Shimizu, ibid. 594460, 537 (1983}, and their Raman R. M. Max tip, Phys. Rev. B 1, 4005 (1970).
spectra contain the weak peaks of interest [P. V. Santos R. Alben, D. Weaire, J. E. Smith, Jr. , and M. H. Brodsky,
(private communication)]. Phys. Rev. B 11, 2271 {1975).
H. W. Verleur and A. S. Barker, Jr. , Phys. Rev. 149, 715 J. Menendez, A. Pinczuk, J. Bevk, and J. P. Mannaerts, J.
{1966). Vac. Sci. Technol. B 6, 1306 (1988).
A. S. Barker, Jr. and A. J. Sievers, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, Suppl. K. Winer, Phys. Rev. B 36, 6072 (1987).
No. 2, S1 (1975). 25J. Bevk, J. P. Mannaerts, L. C. Feldman, B. A. Davidson, and
G. P. Srivastava, J. L. Martins, and A. Zunger, Phys. Rev. B A. Ourmazd, Appl. Phys. Lett. 49, 286 (1986).