Instructions and Grading Rubric for the Final PeTa (Advocacy/Inspirational Video)

INSTRUCTIONS
1. The video must have 3-5 minutes running time.
2. Sources must be acknowledged and properly cited. Copyright laws must be observed.
3. Submission of Output:

GRADING RUBRIC

Category Exemplary (4) Proficient (3) Developing (2) Needs

Improvement (1
Content Relevant, telling, Relevant, telling, Less-relevant, Details and
X2 and but shows some less- informative, information are
demonstrates inconsistency in and shows little irrelevant and
in-depth the presentation understanding of shows no
understanding and understanding the social understanding of
of the social of social phenomenon the social
phenomenon phenomenon being studied. phenomenon
being studied. being studied. being studied.
Technicality Editing is Editing has few Inconsistent in Required format
X2 consistent with inconsistencies following the for editing is
the required with the required required format discarded and
format and format and for editing and cinematography
cinematography cinematography is cinematography is of a very poor
is clear and of high quality but is of poor quality. quality.
precise. inferior in clarity
and precision.
Creativity Very creative in Creative in the Less-creative in Less-creative in
X2 the presentation presentation of the presentation the presentation
of phenomenon/issu of of
phenomenon/is e and good phenomenon/iss phenomenon/iss
 sue and utilization of ue and resources ue and resources
excellent in the resources. are satisfactorily are poorly
utilization of utilized. utilized.
resources.
Originality Contents are Contents are Some of the Borrowed
X1 original and original but some contents are not contents and no
sources are sources are not original and only acknowledgment
properly properly few of the of sources.
cited/acknowled cited/acknowledg sources are
ged. ed. acknowledged.
Organization The output is of The output is of The output is of The output has
X1 high quality and good quality with poor quality and no quality and is
consistent with few inconsistent with not consistent
the required inconsistencies the required with the required
specifications. with the required specifications. specifications.
specifications.

PEER EVALUATION (10 points)

Evaluate the performance of each group member using the rubrics for COOPERATION AND CONTRIBUTION.

1. On the 1st column, list down the name of each member in alphabetical order.
2. Using the succeeding columns, each member (except the one whose name is listed on the particular row) will give a grade for that particular member, based on the rubrics for
COOPERATION and CONTRIBUTION.
3. On the last column, the leader will indicate the average peer evaluation score each member received from the group.

CRITERIA EXEMPLARY (10) PROFICIENT (8) DEVELOPING (6) BEGINNING (4)

Member contributed more than Member contributed Member contributed less Member did not
COOPERATION AND CONTRIBUTION what was required and what was required than what was required contribute and did not
cooperated well with the group. and cooperated with and somewhat cooperate with the group.
 cooperated with the
the group. group.

GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE AVERAGE OF
PRINT NAME OF MEMBER
FROM PEER FROM PEER FROM FROM FROM FROM FROM FROM FROM GRADE FROM
( in alphabetical order)
1 2 PEER 3 PEER 4 PEER 5 PEER 6 PEER 7 PEER 8 PEER 9 PEERS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.