This document discusses the history and development of criminology as a field of study. It began as a complex, multidisciplinary area drawing from fields like anthropology, sociology, psychology and law. Early theories of crime included demonological theories that viewed it as an act of evil or divine will theories that saw it as God's punishment. The Classical school in the 18th century was utilitarian and viewed criminals as rational actors to be punished with certainty and retribution. Positivism later emerged, viewing criminals as externally or internally determined and focusing on rehabilitation over punishment. Neoclassicism continued this tradition within a framework of right realism.
This document discusses the history and development of criminology as a field of study. It began as a complex, multidisciplinary area drawing from fields like anthropology, sociology, psychology and law. Early theories of crime included demonological theories that viewed it as an act of evil or divine will theories that saw it as God's punishment. The Classical school in the 18th century was utilitarian and viewed criminals as rational actors to be punished with certainty and retribution. Positivism later emerged, viewing criminals as externally or internally determined and focusing on rehabilitation over punishment. Neoclassicism continued this tradition within a framework of right realism.
This document discusses the history and development of criminology as a field of study. It began as a complex, multidisciplinary area drawing from fields like anthropology, sociology, psychology and law. Early theories of crime included demonological theories that viewed it as an act of evil or divine will theories that saw it as God's punishment. The Classical school in the 18th century was utilitarian and viewed criminals as rational actors to be punished with certainty and retribution. Positivism later emerged, viewing criminals as externally or internally determined and focusing on rehabilitation over punishment. Neoclassicism continued this tradition within a framework of right realism.
pioneers in multi-disciplines namely anthropology, sociology, political science, economics, psychology, psychiatry, ethics, law and beyond. Maybe this is one of the reasons why there is still a problem in laying down the detailed development of this field of study. In as much as it is a result of various principles and theories emanating from different fields of studies both from social sciences and applied sciences. In fact, the study of crimes and criminals even comes first prior to the development of this field called criminology. Pre-Classical Period Before the birth of the Classical school of thoughts people believes that crime is an act of evil or demon. That is the concept of the so called “Demonological theory” which states that criminal behaviour was believed to be the result of evil spirits and demons something of natural force that controls man’s behaviour. Another ancient concept of crime is the “Divine will theory” that God allows a person to commit a crime for it is His ways of punishing them for disobedience to the will of God. School of Classical Criminology Thoughts (MID OF 18th Century)
BASIS Based on the Philosophy of
Utilitarianism “Philosophical Approach” FOCUS Crimes and Punishment
CRIMINAL All man are Rationale Being
Felicific Calculus or Rational Calculator
PUNISHMENT PRINCIPLES: Certainty of Punishment
PURPOSE: RETRIBUTION School of Classical Criminology Thoughts (MID OF 18th Century)
P Cessare Bonessana Marchese Di Beccaria
E ( Cradle of Criminology & father of Classical Criminology) R “On Crimes and Punishments” or “Dei Delitti e Delle Pene” S 1764 Free will or Rational Choice Theory O N A Jeremy Bentham L Hedonism – man only seeks for pleasure I Founder of Utilitarianism T Pain and Pleasure Theory Designed the Panopticon Prison I Greatest Happiness Theory E S School of POSITIVIST Thoughts (Late 18th Century)
BASIS Scientific Approach
Biological, Psychological and
Sociological Determinism affecting FOCUS Criminal behaviour “Criminal” Criminal behaviour is cause by CRIMINAL External and internal factors outside Of individual’s control
PURPOSE: Reformation/ Rehabilitation/ Treatment
PUNISHMENT School of POSITIVIST Thoughts (Late 18th Century) P Augusto Comte – Father of Sociology POSITIVIST – followers of Comte. E Cesare Lombroso – Father of Positivist/Modern/Empirical R Focus on the Biological and Psychological S Framework of man Classify criminals based on Atavistic Stigmata O “Anomalies” namely: (1) Born Criminal, N (2) Insane Criminal, and (3) Criminaloid or A Criminal by Passion. Raffaele Garofalo – focus on Psychological equivalent L “Moral Anomalies” & Sociological concept of I “Natural Crimes”. Criminals are : (1) Murderer, T (2) Violent, (3) Deficient, and (4) Lascivious. Enrico Ferri – (socio & ecological factors) Crime is a result I of not a single but a combination of factors E classified as (1) physical (2) anthropological S such as age, sex, biological and psychological, (3) social etc.. “Free will by stating that free will of men may be affected by other factors and crime is committed due to some compelling reasons that prevail. These causes are pathology, incompetence, insanity or any condition that will make it impossible for the individual to exercise free will entirely. Composed mainly of British philosophers who continue the traditions of classical criminology within the framework of “Right Realism” Effects of Neoclassical School of Thoughts: Children & lunatics are exempted from punishment. Certain mitigating or exempting circumstances should be taken into account. (in the legal concept) END OF PART 2