You are on page 1of 3

Môn học CADCAM

Bài tập về nhà số 1: Thiết kế ngược sản phẩm con chuột máy tính
1. Sử dụng phương pháp giải mã công nghệ để phân tích sản phẩm chuột máy tính theo Ergonomic
2. Sử dụng phương pháp thiết kế ngược phù hợp để vẽ lại sản phẩm.
3. Phân tích, hiệu chỉnh biên dạng sản phẩm phù hợp với các tiêu chí ở câu 1.
Hướng dẫn
1. Sử dụng bảng đánh giá trong slide 2, 3
2. Tùy chọn công cụ phù hợp, ví dụ: các app scan 3D trên smartphone, ipad, các app xây dựng
mô hình 3D từ các hình ảnh (yêu cầu phải xuất được file STL), vẽ trên các phần mềm CAD từ
hình ảnh…
Khuyến khích: in 3D mô hình thiết kế được để đánh giá, thiết kế lại.
Thời lượng - Nộp bài
1. Thời lượng: 3 tuần (kể từ khi giao bài)
2. Trình bày cụ thể các bước thực hiện trên file word/pdf
3. Tài liệu nộp: file word/pdf, video minh họa các bước, tài liệu hướng dẫn sử dụng phần mềm,
tài liệu tham khảo…
Bảng phân tích - đánh giá sản phẩm
1 pt | Below 2 pts | Approaches 3 pts | Meets 4 pts | Exceeds
Product Analysis I was unable to I was able to perform a I was able to perform a I was able to perform a product analysis on
perform a product analysis on my product analysis on my my chosen product. I documented my
product chosen product. However, I chosen product. I findings as written notes, before reframing
analysis on my only documented my documented my findings all my key insights in a visual format. My
chosen product findings as written notes as written notes, before visuals were carefully designed to
reframing some of the key communicate my insights in a clear and
insights in a visual format engaging way
Design Criteria I was unable to I was able to generate a list I was able to generate a I was able to generate a list of design criteria
generate a list of design criteria and list of design criteria and and constraints, which were all driven by my
of design constraints. However they constraints, which were product analysis study. I ensured that my list
criteria and were not informed by my mostly informed by my covered every pain point discovered in my
constraints product analysis study product analysis study product analysis
Clay Explorations I was unable to I was able to support my I was able to support my I was able to support my end user in
support my end end user in generating some end user in generating a generating a broad range of clay models that
user in basic clay models but they range of clay models that addressed all of my design criteria and
generating any did not address my design addressed most of my constraints. I not only supported them in
clay prototypes criteria and constraints design criteria and creating several models but ensured that
constraints each one was completely different to
explore varying options
Bảng phân tích - đánh giá sản phẩm

1 pt | Below 2 pts | Approaches 3 pts | Meets 4 pts | Exceeds

Design and I was unable to I was able to design and I was able to design and I was able to design and
Make design and make a make a 3D printed model. make a model that make a model that
3D printed model However I struggled with attached to my chosen attached to my chosen
some technical aspects and product. My process product. I explored new
it did not integrate well with involved using the software tools (not
my chosen product same software tools in covered in the tutorial)
the tutorial to create a stunning
design for my end user
Test & Iterate I was unable to I was able to gather I was able to gather I was able to combine
gather feedback and feedback and suggest feedback, which feedback with my own
suggest improvements to my design. informed a range of technical analysis of the
improvements to my However, the improvements suggestions to improve product to suggest a
design I suggested did not link to my design range of improvements
the feedback I acquired to my design

You might also like