Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Marks Description
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Distinction
14-15 marks Chord progressions are harmonically acceptable and stylistically
appropriate
Initiative is shown in the chord choice, i.e. inversions, use of chords
other than I, IV, V, etc., where appropriate
Grammatical implications are correct
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Merit
12-13 marks Chord progressions are harmonically acceptable and stylistically aware
Initiative is shown in the chord choice, i.e. some inversions, use of
chords other than I, IV, V, etc., where appropriate
\Grammatical implications are mostly correct
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Pass
10–11 marks Chord progressions are generally harmonically acceptable
Chord choice is more limited, i.e. largely I, V, root position, etc.
A limited number of incorrect grammatical implications
Imperfect grasp of key/tonality, cadence points
Below pass
8–9 marks A significant number of harmonically unacceptable chord progressions
Some chords do not relate correctly to given melody notes
Chords not allotted to some asterisks
A significant number of incorrect grammatical implications
Marks Description
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Distinction
14-15 marks Bass notes and figuring imply satisfactory harmonic progressions
Initiative is shown in the chord choice, i.e. inversions, use of chords
other than I, IV, V, etc., where appropriate
Chord choice shows some grasp of the style
Grammatical implications are correct
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Merit
12-13 marks Bass notes and figuring imply satisfactory harmonic progressions
Initiative is shown in the chord choice, i.e. some inversions, use of
chords other than I, IV, V, etc., where appropriate
Chord choice shows some grasp of the style
Grammatical implications are mostly correct
Key/tonality, cadence points are correctly treated
Pass
10–11 marks Bass notes and figuring imply harmonic progressions which are
generally acceptable
Chord choice is more limited, i.e. largely I, V, root position, etc.
A limited number of incorrect grammatical implications
Imperfect grasp of key/tonality, cadence points
Below pass
8–9 marks Bass notes and/or figuring imply a significant number of harmonically
unacceptable progressions
Some bass notes/figures do not relate correctly to given melody notes
Frequent incorrect grammatical implications
Incorrect grasp of key/tonality, cadence points
Not achieved
5–7 marks Bass notes and/or figuring imply mostly unacceptable harmonic
progressions
A significant number of bass notes/figures do not relate correctly to
given melody notes
Widespread incorrect grammatical implications
Grade 6- Q2
Marks Description
Figuring is correctly interpreted
Distinction
14-15 marks Melodic line shows musical interest
Part-writing is good and 6/4–5/3 progression(s) correctly handled
Grammatical errors are sparse
Figuring is mostly correctly interpreted
Merit
12-13 marks Melodic line shows some musical interest
Part-writing is generally good and 6/4–5/3 progression(s)
correctly handled
Grammatical errors are few
Few errors in interpretation of figuring
Pass
10–11 marks Melodic line not always musically effective but is generally sound
Part-writing is acceptable, if not always musically convincing
There are some grammatical errors
Some errors in interpretation of figuring
Below pass
8–9 marks Bass notes not harmonised
Part-writing is poor
There are numerous grammatical errors
Much incorrect interpretation of figuring
Not achieved
5–7 marks Numerous bass notes not harmonised
Little or no attention given to part-writing
Grammatical errors are widespread
Grade 6- Q3
Marks Description
An excellent sense of shape and direction
Distinction
18–20 marks Style/character of the given opening has been well maintained and
developed
The melody implies a convincing harmonic foundation
Melodic/rhythmic aspects of the given opening have been well
developed and continued
In option [a] the modulation has been correctly and musically
achieved
There is a suitably balanced phrase structure
Awareness of anacrusic nature of given opening, if present
The melody is suited to and explores the range of the stipulated
instrument
Dynamics/performance directions have been musically applied
A good sense of shape and direction
Merit
16–17 marks Style/character of the given opening has been well maintained
The melody implies a plausible harmonic foundation
Melodic/rhythmic aspects of the given opening have been well
developed and continued
In option [a] the modulation has been correctly achieved
There is a suitably balanced phrase structure
Awareness of anacrusic nature of given opening, if present
The melody is suited to and within compass of the stipulated
instrument
Dynamics/performance directions have been mostly musically
applied
Some sense of shape and direction
Pass
13–15 marks Some attempt has been made to maintain the style/character of the
opening
Melodic/rhythmic aspects of the given opening have been continued,
if somewhat unimaginatively (rather repetitious, over-use of
sequence, etc.)
Some sense of phrase structure
Occasional faults in rhythmic notation
In option [a] the modulation has been achieved
The melody is reasonably suited to, and generally within the compass
of the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions are present
The melody lacks overall shape and direction
Below Pass
10–12 marks Poor maintenance of the style/character of the opening
Very repetitious and unimaginative in the use of melodic/rhythmic
aspects of the given opening
Some faults in rhythmic notation
Poor sense of phrase structure
The melody is not well suited to/does not keep well within the
compass of the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions are sparse and/or inappropriate
The melody is very shapeless and meandering
Not Achieved
7–9 marks Style/character of the given opening not maintained
No proper attempt to utilise melodic/rhythmic aspects of the given
opening
Frequent faults in rhythmic notation
No sense of phrase structure
The melody shows no real thought for the practicalities or compass
of the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions absent or quite inappropriate
Grade 7- Q1
Marks Description
Key/tonality/modulations (if present) have been correctly perceived
Distinction
14-15 marks The figuring provides a musically satisfactory harmonic structure and
a secure sense of style
The harmonic vocabulary shows some initiative, and features such as
sequences have been correctly observed
Key/tonality/modulations (if present) have been correctly perceived
Merit
12-13 marks The figuring provides a musically satisfactory harmonic structure and
some sense of style
The harmonic vocabulary shows some initiative, and features such as
sequences have been correctly observed
Key/tonality/modulations (if present) have been correctly perceived
Pass
10–11 marks The figuring provides a harmonic basis which is generally acceptable
The harmonic vocabulary is modest but generally plausible
An imperfect grasp of key/tonality/modulations (if present)
Below pass
8–9 marks The figuring implies a significant number of harmonically
unacceptable progressions
The figuring does not always relate correctly to the given bass or
melody notes
An incorrect grasp of key/tonality/modulations (if present)
Not achieved
5–7 marks The figuring implies mostly unacceptable harmonic progressions
Absence of many necessary figures
A significant number of figures do not relate correctly to the given
bass or melody notes
Grade 7- Q2
Description
Marks
Harmonic outline consistently well embellished
Distinction
14-15 marks Excellent consistency of texture and style throughout the passage
Implied features such as sequences have been observed
Grammatical aspects are correct
Harmonic outline mostly well (but not excessively) embellished
Merit
12-13 marks Good consistency of texture and style throughout the passage
Grammatical aspects are mostly correct
Some embellishment of the harmonic outline
Pass
10–11 marks An attempt to maintain texture and style
A limited number of incorrect grammatical aspects
Sparse embellishment of harmonic outline
Below pass
8–9 marks Some clashing harmonies
Poor maintenance of texture and style
Some harmonies on Staves A have been altered on Staves B
A significant number of incorrect grammatical aspects
Much of the harmonic outline not embellished
5–7 marks
No real awareness of texture or style
Many harmonies on Staves A have been altered on Staves B
Widespread incorrect grammatical aspects
Grade 7- Q3a
Marks Description
Melody has an excellent shape, sense of direction and style
Distinction
18–20 marks Melody completely agrees with the harmonic structure of the passage
Melody lies well within the compass and capabilities of the
instrument
Grammatical aspects are correct
Melody has good shape, sense of direction and style
Merit
16–17 marks Melody agrees well with the harmonic structure of the passage
Melody lies well within the compass and capabilities of the
instrument
Grammatical aspects are generally correct
Melody has some shape
Pass
13–15 marks There is general agreement between the melody and the harmonic
structure of the passage
Melody is generally within the compass and capabilities of the
instrument
A limited number of grammatical errors
Poorly shaped melodic line
Below Pass
10–12 marks Some harmonic clashes
Melodic line frequently exceeds the compass, and/or is unsuited to
the capabilities of, the instrument for which it is written
A significant number of grammatical errors
No proper shape to the melodic line
Not Achieved
7–9 marks Many discrepancies between the melody and the harmonic structure
of the passage
Little awareness of the compass or capabilities of the instrument for
which the melody is written
Widespread grammatical errors
Grade 7- Q3b
Marks Description
An excellent sense of shape and direction
Distinction
18–20 marks There is an excellent unified sense of style/character
Rhythmic/melodic aspects of the given opening have been well
utilised (but this is optional in chord progression question)
Chord progressions have been correctly utilised or well
developed
Melody is suited to and within the compass of the stipulated or
chosen instrument
Dynamics/performance directions have been musically applied
A good sense of shape and direction
Merit
16–17 marks There is a good unified sense of style/character
Rhythmic/melodic aspects of the given opening have been well
utilised (but this is optional in chord progression question)
Chord progressions have been correctly utilised,
including appropriate modulation
Melody is suited to and within the compass of the stipulated or
chosen instrument
Dynamics/performance directions have been musically applied
The melody has some sense of shape and direction
Pass
13–15 marks There is some overall sense of style/character
Some utilisation has been made of the rhythmic/melodic
aspects of the given opening (but this is optional in chord
progression question)
Occasional faults in rhythmic notation
Chord progressions have been generally correctly utilised
Melody is reasonably suited to, and generally within the
compass of, the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions are present
Melody lacks overall shape and direction
Below Pass
10–12 marks Melody contains some awkward intervals
Poor sense of style/character
Unimaginative/repetitious use of given opening (optional in
chord progression question)
Significant incorrect utilisation of chord progressions, including
omitted modulations
Some faults in rhythmic notation
Melody is not well suited to/does not keep well within the
compass of the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions sparse and/or inappropriate
Melody is very shapeless and meandering
Not Achieved
7–9 marks Melody contains many awkward intervals
Chord progressions are mostly incorrectly utilised
Melody shows no real thought for, or awareness of the
compass of the stipulated instrument
Dynamics/performance directions are absent or quite
inappropriate
Frequent faults in rhythmic notation