CHAPTER 3

Table 1. Technology / Online Based Learning

Mean Verbal
  4 3 2 1 Average Interpretation
Strongly Strongly
QUESTIONS Agree Agree Disagree Disagree    
1 3 12(36) 14(28) 1 2.56 Agree
2 7 10(30) 12(24) 1 2.10 Disagree
3 2 12(36) 15(30) 1 2.50 Disagree
4 6 7(21) 16(32) 1 2.60 Agree
5 4 15(45) 10(20) 1 2.60 Agree
6 4 16(48) 8(16) 2 2.60 Agree
7 7 16(48) 6(12) 1 2.96 Agree
8 4 14(42) 8(16) 4 2.46 Disagree
9 9 14(42) 5(10) 2 3.00 Agree
10 11 11(33) 6(12) 2 3.03 Agree
Weighted Average 2.64 Agree

Based on the table 1 shown above, question number 9 garnered the highest average mean
among the ten questions, resulted 3.03 which means agree if asks if they believe that web is a
useful platform for learning.

As the data computed, question number 2 garnered the least mean average among the ten
questions with a total of 2.10 which means they find it very difficult to study online.

In conclusion, the table 1 has the weighted average of 2.64 which means that the students
agreed in the introduction of blended-learning using the technology/online based learning.

Table 2. Modular Based Learning

 Mean Verbal
4 3 2 1 Average Interpretation
Strongly Strongly
QUESTIONS Agree Agree Disagree Disagree
1 6(24) 12(36) 10(20) 2 2.73 Agree
2 9(36) 8(24) 10(20) 3 2.43 Disagree
3 5(20) 10(30) 14(28) 1 2.63 Agree
4 5(20) 20(60) 5(10) 0 3.00 Agree
5 6(24) 4(12) 16(32) 4 2.40 Disagree
6 18(72) 3(9) 1(2) 8 3.03 Agree
7 6(24) 18(54) 5(10) 1 2.96 Agree
8 12(48) 11(33) 5(10) 2 3.10 Agree
9 6(24) 3(9) 12(24) 9 2.20 Disagree
10 3(12) 5(15) 18(36) 4 2.23 Disagree
Weighted Average 2.67 Agree

Based on the table shown above, question number 8 has the highest mean average of
3.10 among the ten questions, which means they agree that it is easy to read from print learning
materials instead of using electronic medium or internet.

As the data computed question number 9 has the least mean average among the ten
questions with a total average of 2.10 with a verbal interpretation of disagree. They believe that
there is a difference between modular teaching and traditional methods that will influence
learning.

In conclusion, the table1 shows the weighted average of 2.67 with a verbal interpretation of
agree. It is believed that there is a positive attitude towards the introduction of blended-learning
using modular based-learning.
Table 3. Student’s Attitude
Mean Verbal
4 3 2 1 Average Interpretation
Strongly Strongly
QUESTIONS Agree Agree Disagree Disagree
1 2(8) 4(12) 20(40) 4 2.13 Disagree
2 5(20) 18(54) 4(8) 3 2.83 Agree
3 5(20) 17(51) 6(12) 2 2.83 Agree
4 7(28) 19(57) 4(8) 0 3.10 Agree
5 6(24) 17(51) 7(14) 0 2.96 Agree
6 7(28) 15(45) 8(16) 0 2.96 Agree
7 6(24) 14(42) 9(18) 1 2.83 Agree
8 5(20) 16(48) 9(18) 0 2.86 Agree
9 8(32) 13(39) 7(14) 2 2.90 Agree
10 11(44) 15(45) 4(8) 0 3.23 Agree
Weighted Average 2.86 Agree

Based on the table 3 shown above, question number 10 got the highest mean average
among the 10 questions with a 3.23 with a verbal interpretation of agree, that effective time
management in handling house chores and school work should be done to accomplish all the
given tasks without so much difficulty.

As the data computed above, question number 1 got the least mean average among the
10 questions with 2.13 which means Disagree, if asks that showing no interest on the subject will
affect how you answer your works.

In conclusion, the table 3 shows the weighted average of 2.86 which means that the
students attitude affects how they view the introduction of blended-learning in this new normal
education.
Table 4. The Correlation between technology/online based learning to student’s attitude.

Summary Output
Regression
Statistics  
0.37882199
Multiple R 1
0.14350610
R Square 1
0.11291703
Adjusted R Square 3
0.28576671
Standard Error 4
Observations 30

ANOVA
Significance
  df SS MS F F
0.38311 0.38311 4.69141 0.03898147
Regression 1 3 3 8 4
2.28655 0.08166
Residual 28 3 3
2.66966
Total 29 7      

Standa
Coefficient rd Lower Upper Lower Upper
  s Error t Stat P-value 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0%
2.0200146 0.3928 5.1422 1.88E- 1.2153395 2.8246 1.2153 2.8246
Intercept 57 3 15 05 66 9 4 9
Technology 0.3059197 0.1412 2.1659 0.0389 0.0166042 0.5952 0.0166 0.5952
/ Online 13 39 68 81 25 35 04 35

The table 4 shows the relationship between the technology/online based learning and student’s
attitude among grade-12 Students. According to the data mentioned above, the data that got 0.37
of multiple r which means weak correlation. The significance f of the data was 0.03.
Table 5. The Correlation between modular based learning to Student’s Attitude
Summary Output

Regression Statistics
0.36928
Multiple R 9
0.13637
R Square 4
Adjusted R 0.10553
Square 1
0.28695
Standard Error 4
Observations 30

ANOVA
Significan
  df SS MS F ce F
Regressio 0.36407 0.36407 4.4214
n 1 4 4 6 0.044605
2.30559 0.08234
Residual 28 2 3
2.66966
Total 29 7      

Coefficien Standar Lower Upper Lower Upper

  ts d Error t Stat P-value 95% 95% 95.0% 95.0%
Interce 0.34970 6.10881 1.37E- 1.41995 2.85263 1.41995 2.85263
pt 2.136294 7 8 06 3 6 3 6
Modula 0.13196 2.10272 0.04460 0.00716 0.54782 0.00716 0.54782
r 0.277496 9 7 5 9 3 9 3
 The table 5 shows the relationship between the modular based learning and the student’s
attitude among the Grade-12 students. According to the data mentioned above, the data that got
o.36 of multiple r which means weak correlation. The significance f of the data was 0.04.