Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Structural Engineer
LOCATIONS
Why am I here........?
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
....50 mins!
ARENA/UK MARKET
.....why timber?
• Design responsibility?
• specialist timber design
• Fragmented industry
• 17 different timber trade organsations
• Skills shortage
• Quality
• Waste
• Health & Safety
• Energy use
ZERO CARBON TIMETABLE (UK)
…is it possible?
Zero carbon.....definition?
Onsite
• Different measures: Maintenance
activities
• Energy (kwh)
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
KLH 700,000m2
Stora Enso 500,000m2
Mayr Melnhof-Kaufmann 500,000m2
Binderholz 400,000m2
Merk Finnforest 200,000m2
Schilliger 200,000m2
• Crosswall
• ‘Hybrid’ (steel/CLT)
CLT DESIGN (overview)
Typical Details
Walls/floors Slab/walls
CONTENTS
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
• GIA 9,500m2
THE BRIEF Open Academy, Norwich
• 3500m3 timber
• Narrow piers
• external walls
• internal walls
OPEN ACADEMY loadbearing facades
OPEN ACADEMY loadbearing facades
• Disproportionate collapse
• Tie forces?
OPEN ACADEMY floors
• Deflection
• Crushing at piers
• Edge protection
OPEN ACADEMY floors
• Exposed soffits
• Crushing
• Flexibility
• Wetting…
OPEN ACADEMY floors
OPEN ACADEMY steel
• Interface/coordination
• Connection details
OPEN ACADEMY building services
• Complex geometry
TIMELINE
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
• Programme
• To optimise programme advantage maximise repetition and adopt rectilinear forms.
• Limit spans to 7.5m where possible (greater spans >230mm thick panels).
• Loadbearing facade
• Use loadbearing CLT façade structure, preferably with a punched window approach.
• Roof
• A simple CLT roof profile also aids an early watertight date (slight falls if possible).
• Foundations
• Shallow strip foundations are more likely possible if a load bearing wall structure is adopted.
• Waste
• You pay for holes, plan board layouts to suit opening where possible.
• Airtightness
• CLT structures typically offer higher levels of airtightness (2-3m3/m2/hr) than traditional
construction (Passivhaus approach)
• Quality
• Surface grade finish of boards can be specified for exposed finish.
• Services installation
• CLT forms a easy surface to fix to and services installation is likely to be quicker when compared
to conventional construction.
• Embodied carbon
• A typical CLT structure will require significantly less energy to manufacture than a steel or
concrete building.
• For every 1000m2 of building built in CLT instead of steel or concrete, up to 350t of CO2 is
saved/stored (this could represent up to 10 years of operational CO2 emissions).
ECONOMIC CLT BUILDINGS
Things to watch
• Design Responsibility
• Engineers should design CLT
• Knowledge/understanding CLT supply chain (design using standard panel sizes)
• Building Services
• Early and detailed design coordination is required (prior to panel fabrication).
• Acoustics
• specialist advice should be sought at early design stage.
• Floor vibration
• Determine design limits for intended use (e.g. 8Hz natural frequency)
• Exposed finishes
• Early attention to details required (fixings)
• Board grade (cost allowance for upgade)
• Staining (rain + UV)
• Drying shrinkage cracking (gradual commissioning of building heating system)
ECONOMIC CLT BUILDINGS
Things to watch (continued)
• Fire
• Fire engineered approach - exposed CLT panels can be engineered for 1-2hr fire resistance.
• Exposed CLT will require a spread of flame treatment (UK).
• Thermal mass
• CLT has a significant thermal mass but less than exposed concrete soffits (nat vent).
• Flexibility
• Internal load bearing walls can be perceived as reducing future flexibility.
• Cost Comparison
• Not just capital cost of frame – consider additional inherent benefits of CLT (i.e.
programme/foundations/facade substrate/secondary steelwork, etc)
CONTENTS
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
• Stadthaus, London, UK
•Architect: Waugh Thistleton
•Engineer: Techniker
Introduction
Lessons Learnt
• acoustics
• first use in UK
• Insitu testing
R+D/FUTURE PROJECTS
• Damping
• 10,000m2 GIA