Science and Technology have large impact in our present society.

It affects every aspects of life;

the environment even the economy. Both De-development Framework of Jason Hickel’s and
Martin Heidegger’s are indeed very mindful of and/or worried about the use of science and
technology. On the impact of this process on society and the individuals. I had characterized
their similarities is that their goal is to live better and meaningful lives and to provide a better
for future generations. Also, they are both realist and environmentalist, concerned about the
destructive nature of powerful humans’ structures such as technology and economic growth.
Neither of them, however, considers these structures to be generally harmful. They are really
massive things we have built that have gone out of hand and need to be responsibly handled.
The De-development Framework of Jason Hickel, according to him, that it is not about attaining
a higher level of understanding and consciousness about our how and why. In my own
perspective is that, his main issue is socio-political in nature such as poverty and sustainability.
While, Martin Heidegger’s, The Question Concerning Technology, is the essence of technology
is by no means anything technological. Martin Heidegger is concerned in how in balance we are
with ourselves, our being, and the natural environment in which we live. Martin Heidegger
provide us with well thought-out concepts to analyzed technology and their relationship to
being, but it is up to us to think before we use to stop technology taking us somewhere that we
might not want to go. In short, Martin Heidegger’s technology reflects us like a deep life lesson,
while Jason Hickel’s economics will better human living standards and the natural world.
According to Aristotle’s in defining good life, it requires good judgement that one need to find
the mean between extremes. It means that each being has a specific responsibility to struggle,
advance and build his or her nature to attain eudaimonia. Eudaimonia means happiness or
welfare. The golden mean and a desire to do good for others will lead to excellent habits and
behaviors. However, most of us find it difficult to implement this insight because of the
conventional scientific Aristotle method of describing things. Flourishing provides an emotional
dimen
Science and Technology have an enormous impact on our present society. It affects every
aspect of life, the environment even the economy. Both the De-development Framework of
Jason Hickel's and Martin Heidegger's are indeed very mindful of or worried about the use of
Science and Technology. On the impact of this process on society and the individuals. I had
characterized their similarities as their goal is to live better and meaningful lives and provide a
better for future generations. Also, they are both realists and environmentalists, concerned
about the destructive nature of powerful humans' structures such as Technology and economic
growth. Neither of them, however, considers these structures to be generally harmful. We've
built massive systems that need to be carefully controlled as they've grown out of control.
According to Jason Hickel, the De-development Framework is not about achieving greater
awareness and consciousness about our how and why. In my perspective is that his main issue
is socio-political in nature, such as poverty and sustainability. While Martin Heidegger's, The
Question Concerning Technology, is the essence of Technology is by no means anything
technological. Martin Heidegger is concerned with how in balance we are with ourselves, our
being, and the natural environment in which we live. Martin Heidegger provides us with well-
thought-out concepts to analyzed Technology and its relationship to being. However, it is up to
us to think before we use to stop Technology from taking us somewhere we might not want to
go. In short, Martin Heidegger's Technology reflects us like a profound life lesson, while Jason
Hickel's economics will better human living standards and the natural world. According to
Aristotle, defining good life requires Good Judgment to find the mean between extremes. It
means that each being has a specific responsibility to struggle, advance, and build its nature to
attain eudaimonia. Eudaimonia means happiness or welfare. The golden mean and a desire to
do good for others will lead to excellent habits and behaviors. However, most of us find it
challenging to implement this insight because of the conventional scientific Aristotle method of
describing things. Flourishing provides an emotional dimension to the concept.
sion to the concept.