Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2 Rizalista vs Pilarista
Instructions:
Complete table provided and answer the question provided.
m
er as
titled "Noli Me Tangere" and "El La Solidaridad was they key works
co
Filibusterismo." This was able to of Marcelo H. del Pilar. Diariong
eH w
help the Filipinos for their fight tagalog was a medium to advocate
for independence with these two liberal ideas among farmers. La
o.
rs e
books, and win liberation from Solidaridad and along his wits in
ou urc
the Spaniards. speaking with people made sure
the uprising was felt.
Propaganda The propaganda style of Jose Before having succeeded as editor
o
Style Rizal revolved mainly around his of the La Solidaridad, many of his
aC s
novel writings describing Spanish ideas to sway the Spanish Rule was
vi y re
It is noteworthy that his work for the Filipino people. His ideology
sought to establish a sense of for nationalism was his extreme
self-identity for the Filipinos and love for the mother land and that
an independent nation. Hence to be able to fulfill what is ours, we
sh
This study source was downloaded by 100000799894882 from CourseHero.com on 07-27-2021 00:41:57 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/65541801/Exercise-31docx/
Analysis: What’s implication of the Rizal-del Pilar rivalry to Rizal’s nationalistic ideologies?
The conflict between the two arose upon del Pilar taking place of Jaena’s role in the La
Solidaridad as editor. This happened during the end of the year 1890. The conflict arose due
to the Rizal’s comments on the editorial policies, which were deemed to be contrary to Rizal’s
political viewpoints. This would lead to a vote among the members in the organization to
decide which policies to be used. However, upon winning, some “Pilaristas” within the
organization still did not like the situation leading to Rizal leaving the role instead. This shows
that even at times where we must be united in order to achieve a goal, differences must be
set aside between the members of a team to function properly. In this case of the
propaganda, people were divided by influences of their leaders as well. A strong implication
of this case is that no matter how much power a leader’s influence has on an organization, if
it cannot unite its people then it will surely lead to disarray of team function.
m
er as
co
eH w
o.
rs e
ou urc
o
aC s
vi y re
ed d
ar stu
is
Th
sh
This study source was downloaded by 100000799894882 from CourseHero.com on 07-27-2021 00:41:57 GMT -05:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/65541801/Exercise-31docx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)