The document provides feedback on a presentation comparing the cultural policies of Peru and Spain. It summarizes that the presentation effectively discussed Peru's cultural heritage but focused more on Peru than the comparison. It recommends maintaining a clear overview of the policy comparisons for the final paper. Additionally, it suggests discussing funding sources for current policies and any recommendations. The feedback praised the use of relevant sociological terms and focus on long and short-term effects, but noted to also consider attracting new audiences. Formal requirements of the presentation were met.
The document provides feedback on a presentation comparing the cultural policies of Peru and Spain. It summarizes that the presentation effectively discussed Peru's cultural heritage but focused more on Peru than the comparison. It recommends maintaining a clear overview of the policy comparisons for the final paper. Additionally, it suggests discussing funding sources for current policies and any recommendations. The feedback praised the use of relevant sociological terms and focus on long and short-term effects, but noted to also consider attracting new audiences. Formal requirements of the presentation were met.
The document provides feedback on a presentation comparing the cultural policies of Peru and Spain. It summarizes that the presentation effectively discussed Peru's cultural heritage but focused more on Peru than the comparison. It recommends maintaining a clear overview of the policy comparisons for the final paper. Additionally, it suggests discussing funding sources for current policies and any recommendations. The feedback praised the use of relevant sociological terms and focus on long and short-term effects, but noted to also consider attracting new audiences. Formal requirements of the presentation were met.
discussion of the cultural heritage of Peru, focusing on the strong gastronomy, indigenous crafts and the various languages present in Peru. At the beginning, you tied this very nicely in with the comparison with Spain, but more towards the end of the presentation the focus Clear comparison of cultural policy was perhaps a bit too much strategies and tools: Explanation of on Peru. That is not policy strategies and tools for necessarily a bad thing, but promotion of Spanish language and make sure that for the final practice. Explanation of effective paper, you make a more policy tools to underline common 40/50 clear overview of the cultural heritage Spain – Latin comparison of the both American country of choice. policies and strategies and Explanation organisations involved. how they fit in the NL market. The reports Where is the funding coming from? provided by IC are actually on Canvas now, so you can access them for some extra ideas.
Additionally, make sure that
you a) discuss where current funding is coming from, and b) in relation to the project, where funding will come from for your specific recommendations.
Concrete use of terms and You made a quite nice
concepts from the literature: 17/20 analysis of the centralised cultural policy in Peru, using Use of adequate terms of cultural terms associated to neo- policy in relation to the assignment. institutionalism and other relevant sociological terms Use of adequate sociological from the course. and/or economic terms in relation to the assignment.
What I appreciated a lot about your
ideas is that you indeed focus on long-term and short-term effects. Long-term effects are often forgotten (or lets say the Concrete arguments for longitudinal trajectories of recommendations), however you recommendations: implemented that nicely in your presentation. Remember that you Identifying gaps in cultural policies. 16/20 also need to take into account how Provide recommendations for you are going to attract new possible improvements. audiences (as per IC’s problem statement), and how you are going to design your recommendation(s) in light of that problem statement. How are you getting people in that themselves don’t even know that they want to learn Spanish. Formal requirements: Very well done! Very nice visuals, and I really Adherence to the requirements of appreciated the llamas in the the pecha kucha (20 images, no presentation and the 10/10 text, 6:40 min. in total).x. Attractive different roles of the group visuals. members. Very nicely done! Sufficient presentation skills.