You are on page 1of 2

Assessment criteria Points Feedback

You had a very good


discussion of the cultural
heritage of Peru, focusing on
the strong gastronomy,
indigenous crafts and the
various languages present in
Peru. At the beginning, you
tied this very nicely in with
the comparison with Spain,
but more towards the end of
the presentation the focus
Clear comparison of cultural policy was perhaps a bit too much
strategies and tools: Explanation of on Peru. That is not
policy strategies and tools for necessarily a bad thing, but
promotion of Spanish language and make sure that for the final
practice. Explanation of effective paper, you make a more
policy tools to underline common 40/50 clear overview of the
cultural heritage Spain – Latin comparison of the both
American country of choice. policies and strategies and
Explanation organisations involved. how they fit in the NL
market. The reports
Where is the funding coming from? provided by IC are actually
on Canvas now, so you can
access them for some extra
ideas.

Additionally, make sure that


you a) discuss where current
funding is coming from, and
b) in relation to the project,
where funding will come
from for your specific
recommendations.

Concrete use of terms and You made a quite nice


concepts from the literature: 17/20 analysis of the centralised
cultural policy in Peru, using
Use of adequate terms of cultural terms associated to neo-
policy in relation to the assignment. institutionalism and other
relevant sociological terms
Use of adequate sociological from the course.
and/or economic terms in relation
to the assignment.

What I appreciated a lot about your


ideas is that you indeed focus on
long-term and short-term effects.
Long-term effects are often
forgotten (or lets say the
Concrete arguments for longitudinal trajectories of
recommendations), however you
recommendations:
implemented that nicely in your
presentation. Remember that you
Identifying gaps in cultural policies. 16/20 also need to take into account how
Provide recommendations for you are going to attract new
possible improvements. audiences (as per IC’s problem
statement), and how you are going
to design your recommendation(s)
in light of that problem statement.
How are you getting people in that
themselves don’t even know that
they want to learn Spanish.
Formal requirements: Very well done! Very nice
visuals, and I really
Adherence to the requirements of appreciated the llamas in the
the pecha kucha (20 images, no presentation and the
10/10
text, 6:40 min. in total).x. Attractive different roles of the group
visuals. members. Very nicely done!
Sufficient presentation skills.

Total 83/100 Well done!

You might also like