PERFORMANCE OF MAPEH STUDENTS THROUGH OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY

Statement of the Problems

This study determine the performance of MAPEH students of the University of

the Cordillera through the use of educational technologies. The study seeks to answers
the following questions:

1. What is the level of influence of educational technologies on the performance

of MAPEH students?

1.a. Is there a significant difference on the level of utilization of the

educational technologies on the performance of MAPEH students?

2. What is the extent of utilization of educational technologies on the

performance of MAPEH students?

2.a. Is there a significant difference on the extent of utilization of educational

technologies of MAPEH students?

3. What intervention on educational technologies to may proposed to enhance

the performance of MAPEH students?

Null Hypotheses

1. There is no significant difference on the level of influence of educational

technologies on the performance of MAPEH students.

2. There is no significant difference on the extent of utilization of educational

technologies on the performance of MAPEH students.
 RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Level of Influence of Educational Technologies

on the Performance of MAPEH Students

Table 1A. Level of influence of educational technologies on the performance of

MAPEH students (N = 155)
Level of Influence
Educational Technologies WMV Description
HI I SI NI
4 3 2 1
1. Internet sources and resources 71 71 13 1 3.38 Influential
2. Gadget and mobile phones 70 63 15 1 3.22 Influential
3. Computer 72 61 21 1 3.32 Influential
4. Computer assisted programs 44 76 33 2 3.08 Influential
5. Projected materials 36 79 36 4 2.95 Influential
6. Educational television (ETV) 40 69 39 7 2.92 Influential
7. Textbooks and other reading 53 64 34 4 3.07 Influential
materials
8. Chalkboard/whiteboard 45 69 31 10 2.96 Influential
9. Models (e.g. the body anatomy) 34 73 38 10 2.84 Influential
10. Mock-up (e.g. athletic bowl 30 69 38 18 2.72 Influential
miniature)
11. Flat pictures, graphs and charts 32 75 39 9 2.84 Influential
12. Sport equipments 64 74 15 2 3.29 Influential
13. Art equipments 55 70 26 4 3.14 Influential
14. Musical instrumentz 64 66 23 2 2.41 Influential
15. First aid kits 59 71 22 3 3.20 Influential
Total 769 1050 423 78
Weighted Mean Value 2.80 Influential

Fc = 1340.84** df = 3, 56 F.05 = =2.77 F.01 = 4.15

Legend = ** , highly significant

Statistical Limits Description

3.51 and above Highly Influential

2.51 to 3.5 Influential
1.51 to 2.5 Slightly Influential
1.5 and below Not Influential
 Extent of Utilization of Educational Technologies
on the Performance of MAPEH Students

Table 2A. Extent of utilization of educational technology on the performance of

of the MAPEH students (N = 155)
Extent of Utilization
Educational Technologies WMV Description
FU U LU NU
4 3 2 1
1. Internet sources and resources 77 68 10 0 3.43 Utilized
2. Gadget and mobile phones 86 59 10 0 3.49 Utilized
3. Computer 80 55 20 0 3.39 Utilized
4. Computer assisted programs 33 79 42 1 2.93 Utilized
5. Projected materials 36 84 35 0 3.01 Utilized
6. Educational television (ETV) 37 65 36 17 2.78 Utilized
7. Textbooks and other reading 59 59 33 4 3.12 Utilized
materials
8. Chalkboard/whiteboard 31 77 42 5 2.86 Utilized
9. Models (eg. The body anatomy) 27 62 59 7 2.70 Utilized
10. Mock-up (eg. Athletic bowl 17 65 58 15 2.54 Utilized
miniature)
11. Flat pictures, graphs and charts 38 59 51 7 2.82 Utilized
12. Sport equipments 56 66 29 4 3.12 Utilized
13. Art equipments 49 61 37 8 2.97 Utilized
14. Musical instrument 57 64 32 2 3.14 Utilized
15. First aid kits 48 65 37 5 3.01 Utilized
Total 731 988 531 75
Weighted Mean Value 3.02 Utilized

Fc = 65.32** df = 3, 56 F.05 = =2.77 F.01 = 4.15

Legend = **, highly significant

Statistical Limits Description

3.51 and above Fully Utilized
2.51 to 3.5 Utilized
1.51 to 2.5 Less Utilized
1.5 and below Not Utilized