The title of the article - The expanding role of immunotherapy in urologic cancers

The key -words: immunotherapy, cancer.

The article has few reference literature and seemingly is the work of three individuals, who are either

seeking to give some relevant information on the prevailing conditions mentioned therein.

The article is basically looking into urologic malignancies including prostate, kidney and bladder cancers.

The aims of this particular study is to advance the role played by immunotherapy in curbing these urology

cancers and how best one can identify and recognize, the potential threats before the onset of the

condition and where the infection has already set in then the basic ways to alleviate or manage the

condition.

The study seemingly is very necessary given the fact that these stated conditions are quite prevalent and

needs to be squarely addressed.

This particular article has not itself used any sampling technique, neither has it any participants in terms

of survey, hence the strengths and weaknesses of the study available, however the reliability and validity

of the study is quite profound.

The results of the study are somehow scanty given the nature of detachment adduced by the authors, they

instead explain that, the majority of patients enrolled did not report to them but to another body. There are

indicators of some results though but not quite tangible, however, the study seems to be much focused on

the theoretical aspects of the conditions in question, basing their analysis on foregoing research and

interventions in the past.

The data generated therefore might be in case tweaked, due to the errors of omission and non-

collaboration on the part of the researchers and the authors of the article.

Discussion.
The article is very significant and necessary for the education of the masses about these conditions, due to

their prevalence and the danger they pose to the infected, since many don’t understand the therapeutic,

interventions available to their aid. In explaining the three conditions the paper has done a relatively

informative role to the reader on immunotherapy in urologic cancers, albeit theoretical with some

hindsight on pertinent issues on the same from other articles.

The limitation of the study is evident on the scanty information given, without a proper and in-depth

study, incorporating figures, facts, and employing other tools of study.

Conclusion.

The study, if accorded further attention can be one of the most profound and important studies ever

conducted, however, having noted that this must be a section of the whole study, there could be a

possibility that the other parts make a whole, but as yet the work at hand though an important one,

requires more added into it for maximum results to be realized, I recommend a further expatiation on this

article and the said conditions.