This document summarizes an engineering analysis of flooding that occurred at a plant site during a heavy rainstorm. The analysis found that:
1) 6 inches of rain per hour caused flooding by overloading the storm sewer drains, which could not handle the high rainfall rate, while a normal 2 inches per hour did not cause flooding.
2) The basin drained within less than an hour after the rain stopped, suggesting the drains were functioning properly and not plugged.
3) The heavy hourly rainfall rate was the cause of the flooding, so flushing the underground drains was not necessary.
This document summarizes an engineering analysis of flooding that occurred at a plant site during a heavy rainstorm. The analysis found that:
1) 6 inches of rain per hour caused flooding by overloading the storm sewer drains, which could not handle the high rainfall rate, while a normal 2 inches per hour did not cause flooding.
2) The basin drained within less than an hour after the rain stopped, suggesting the drains were functioning properly and not plugged.
3) The heavy hourly rainfall rate was the cause of the flooding, so flushing the underground drains was not necessary.
This document summarizes an engineering analysis of flooding that occurred at a plant site during a heavy rainstorm. The analysis found that:
1) 6 inches of rain per hour caused flooding by overloading the storm sewer drains, which could not handle the high rainfall rate, while a normal 2 inches per hour did not cause flooding.
2) The basin drained within less than an hour after the rain stopped, suggesting the drains were functioning properly and not plugged.
3) The heavy hourly rainfall rate was the cause of the flooding, so flushing the underground drains was not necessary.
Case Histories http://mechanicalengineeringhelp.com
Case 114: A local flooding event at a plant site
During a heavy rainstorm, flooding oc- curred at a plant location that had never before flooded. Concern arose that the un- derground storm sewer lines had become plugged with debris; however, it was unde- sirable to flush out the underground lines if it was not strictly necessary. Had the 6 in. of rain that had fallen in an hour (inch- es per hour, or iph) caused the flooding? The rain accumulation may have been too much for the storm sewer drains to handle. Typically, a heavy rain is 2 iph for the same time period. The question was: Were the drains plugged, or was the flooding due to FIG. 1. Flooded basin area. the sudden high rainfall rate? An analysis can help answer this question. FIG. 1 shows a depressed basin- (Q in – Q out ) = Q stored = TABLE 1. Flow model results type area (Abasin ) with the storm sewer (3) Abasin × h ÷ tsec Flow Flow drains (Adrain ) that had flooded. The area entering, leaving, Result, (Arain ft2) is the rain shed that captures the Arain × r – 0.8 × N × Adrain × Condition Qenter Qleave h ft rainfall and directs it to the drains. When (2 × g × h)0.5 = Abasin × h ÷ tsec (4) Heavy rain, 44.4 cfs 32.5 cfs 1.6 ft the water height (h ft) in the basin (Abasin ), This equation can be solved for (h) 6 iph buildup which is a low point, reaches the height of by iterative or closed form methods, as Normal rainfall, 14.8 cfs 12.8 cfs 0.3 ft the curb drain, the water starts to build up. shown in Eq. 5: 2 iph buildup The drains are gravity-type drains with a During the storm, N = 2, flow area of (Acurb ft2), and there are (N) Acurb = 2 ft2, Arain = 320,000 ft2, appears that the heavy hourly rainfall had number in the basin area. The rainfall rate Abasin = 25,000 ft2, r = 1.4 × (5) caused the flooding. is (r ft/sec) over a period of time (tsec ). 10–4 ft/sec (6 in./hr), This information was discussed with With this information, an analytical g = 32.2 ft/sec2, tsec = 3,600 sec the plant facilities manager so that a plan model can be developed. The theory is could be developed for any future, sud- much like filling a bathtub. When incom- TABLE 1 shows that the drains could not den heavy rainfalls of this magnitude. ing water (meaning the faucet or rainfall handle 6 iph of rain, and the level built The underground drain piping did not from the watershed) is greater than the up during the rainfall. A normal heavy need to be flushed. outgoing water (meaning the drain or rainfall of 2 iph does not appear to build NOTE storm sewers), the level (h ft) will build up above the drain height. Some idea of Case 113 was published in HP July 2021. up in the basin (meaning tub) and eventu- whether the drains were plugged can be For past cases, please visit ally fill to a height (h ft) in (tsec ) seconds. determined by noticing how long it takes www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com. The water going into the basin can be for the basin to empty after the rain has LITERATURE CITED calculated with Eq. 1: stopped, as shown in Eqs. 6 and 7: 1 Sofronas, A., Unique Engineering Methods for Analyzing Failures and Catastrophic Events: A Practical Q in = Arain × r (1) Q drain = 0.8 × N × Adrain × Guide for Engineers, Wiley, Hoboken, New Jersey, To [2 × g × (h ÷ 2)]0.5 = 23.7 cfs (6) be published in late 2021. The water out of the drains due to gravity can be calculated with Eq. 2: (t) time to empty = Abasin × h ÷ TONY SOFRONAS, D. Eng, was the (7) Q drain = 1,795 sec or 0.5 hr worldwide lead mechanical engineer Q out = 0.8 × N × Adrain × (2 × g × h) 0.5 for ExxonMobil Chemicals before (2) The site was dry again in less than 1 hr, retiring. He now owns Engineered meaning that it had drained at the proper Products, which provides consulting The difference is the amount stored, capacity due to gravity alone. This sug- and engineering seminars on machinery and pressure vessels. which builds up with time (tsec ), as gests that the drains were acting as de- Dr. Sofronas has authored several engineering books shown in Eqs. 3 and 4: signed and probably were not plugged. It and numerous technical articles on analytical methods.