MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: ___________________________________________________ Name of Rater: ____________________________________

Position: ___________________________________________ Position: ___________________________________
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED/ ALANGALANG AGRO INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL/ LEYTE Date of Review: ___________________________________
Rating Period:

Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 8.0% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Knowledg knowledge Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services e and of content inter-observer agreement
Pedagogy within and form from
across 1. an online observation of
curriculum online synchronous
teaching teaching
areas. 2. if option 1 is not
possible, an observation
of a video lesson that is
SLM-based or MELC
Efficiency
aligned
3. if option 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation
of a demonstration
teaching via LAC
Timeliness
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Basic 2. Ensured 8.0% Any supplementary Quality
Education the positive material (in print/digital
Services use of ICT format) made by the ratee
to facilitate and used in the lesson
the teaching delivery that highlights the
and learning positive use of ICT to
process facilitate the teaching and
learning process
 activity sheet/s
 one lesson from a
self-learning module
(SLM)
 lesson plan (E.G.,
Efficiency
DLP, DLL, WHLP,
WLP, WLL, Lesson
Exemplars, and the
likes)
 video lesson
 audio lesson
 other learning
materials in print/
digital format
(please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Basic 3. Applied a 8.0% Any supplementary Quality
Education range of material (in print/digital
Services teaching format) made by the ratee
strategies to and used in the lesson
develop delivery that highlights
critical and teaching strategies to
creative develop critical and creative
thinking, as thinking, as well as other
well as other higher-order thinking skills
higher-order  activity sheet/s
thinking  one lesson from a
skills. self-learning module
(SLM)
 lesson plan (E.G.,
DLP, DLL, WHLP, Efficiency
WLP, WLL, Lesson
Exemplars, and the
likes)
 video lesson
 audio lesson
 other learning
materials in print/
digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)
Timeliness
Basic 2. 4. 8.0% Any supplementary Quality
Education Diversity Established material (in print/digital
Services of a learner- format) made by the ratee
Learners centered and used in the lesson
& culture by delivery that highlights
Assessme using teaching strategies that are
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
nt and teaching responsive to learners’ Efficiency
Reporting strategies linguistic, cultural,
that respond socioeconomic, or religious
to their backgrounds
linguistic,  activity sheet/s
cultural,  one lesson from a
socioecono self-learning module
mic and (SLM)
religious  lesson plan (E.G., Timeliness
background DLP, DLL, WHLP,
s WLP, WLL, Lesson
Exemplars, and the
likes)
 video lesson
 audio lesson
 other learning
materials in print/
digital format
(please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 5. Planned 8.0% Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services delivered inter-observer agreement
teaching form from
strategies
that are
responsive
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
to the 1. an online Efficiency
special observation of
educational online synchronous
needs of teaching
learners in 2. if option 1 is not
difficult possible, an
circumstanc observation of a
es*, video lesson that is
including: SLM-based or
geographic MELC aligned
isolation, 3. if option 1 and 2 are
chronic not possible, an
illness; observation of a Timeliness
displacemen demonstration
t due to teaching via LAC
armed
conflict,
urban
resettlement
or disasters;
child abuse
and child
labor
practices
Basic 6. Used 8.0% 6. Evidence that highlights Quality
Education strategies providing accurate and
Services for providing constructive feedback to
timely, improve learner
accurate performance and that shows
and timeliness of feedback
constructive given to any of the following
feedback to  activity sheet
improve  performance task
learner  quiz or test
performance  self-learning module
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Efficiency

Timeliness
Basic 3. 7. Selected, 8.0% Classroom Observation Quality
Education Curriculu developed, Tool (COT) rating sheet or
Services m and organized inter-observer agreement
Planning and used form from
appropriate 1. an online
teaching observation of
and learning online synchronous
resources, teaching
including 2. if option 1 is not
ICT, to possible, an
address observation of video
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
learning lesson that is SLM- Efficiency
goals based or MELC
aligned
3. if option 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demonstration
teaching via LAC

Timeliness
8. Set 8.0% One lesson plan ( e.g. DLP, Quality
achievable DLL, WHLP, WLP, WLL,
and Lesson Exemplars, and the
appropriate likes) or one lesson from a
learning self-learning module
outcomes prepared by the rate with
that are achievable and appropriate Efficiency
aligned with learning outcomes that are
learning aligned with the learning
competencie competencies as shown in
s any of the following:

 Lecture/ discussion
 Activity/ activity Timeliness
sheet
 Performance task
 Rubric for assessing
performance using
criteria that
appropriately
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
describe the target
output

Basic 4. 9. Built 8.0% Proof of participation in any Quality

Education Assessme relationships activity for improved access
Services nt and with parents/ to education such as, but
Reporting guardians not limited to the ff. activities
and the  Distribution of
wider school learning materials to
community learners/ parents
to facilitate (e.g., receipt form/
involvement monitoring form
in the during distribution of
educative learning materials,
process etc.)
 Brigada Eskwela
(e.g., commitment
form to
stakeholders,
developed advocacy
materials, certificate
of participation that
involves parents’/
stakeholders’
engagement signed
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
by the school head, Efficiency
etc)
 Home Visitation
(e.g., home
visitation form, etc.)
1. Parent-teacher log or
proof of other
stakeholders meeting
(e.g., one-on-one
parent-teacher-learner
conference log;
attendance sheet with
minutes of online or
face-to-face meeting;
proof of involvement in
the learners’/ parents’
Timeliness
orientation, etc.)
2. Any form of
communication to
parents/ stakeholders
(e.g., notice of meeting;
screenshot of chat/text
message/
communication with
parent/ guardian [name
or any identifier
removed]; digital/ printed
copy of Learner
Enrolment Survey Form
signed by the ICT
Coordinator/ Focal
person and School
Head
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Basic 10. 8.0%  Certificate of Quality
Education Participated completion in a
Services in course/training
professional  Certificate of
networks to participation in a
share webinar, retooling,
knowledge upskilling, and other Efficiency
and to training/ seminar/
enhance workshop with proof
practice of implementation
 Certificate of
recognition/
speakership in a Timeliness
webinar, retooling,
upskilling, and other
training/ seminar /
workshop
 Any proof of
participation to a
benchmarking
activity
 Any proof of
participation in
school LAC
sessions ( online/
face-to-face certified
by the LAC
Coordinator
 Others (please
specify and provide
annotations)
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
Basic 11. Main MOV: Quality
Education Developed a
Services personal Individual Performance and
improvemen Commitment Review Form-
t plan based Development Plan (IPCRF-
on reflection DP)
of one’s
practice and Supporting MOV:
on going Efficiency
Any document aligned
professional
learning with the IPCRF-DP such as

 Reflection of one’s
practice during LAC
session/s with proof
of attendance
 Reflection/ Personal
Notes on Coaching
and Mentoring and/
or Mid-Year Review Timeliness
 Personal Notes
journal on
division/school=led
INSET with proof of
attendance
 Certificate of
enrolment/
registration form/
class card in
graduate/ post
graduate school/
online courses
 Any learning
material highlighting
the improvement
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
done based on
accomplished
“reflection” section
 Others ( Please
specify and provide
annotations)

Basic 5. Plus 12. 12.0 Proof of: Quality

Education Factor Performed %
Services various  Committee
related involvement
works/  Advisorship of co-
activities curricular activities
that  Involvement as
contribute to module/ learning Efficiency
the material writer
teaching-  Involvement as
learning module/learning
process material validator
 participation in the
RO/SDO/school
initiated TV-/radio-
based instruction
 book or journal
authorship/ Timeliness
contributorship
 coordinatorship/
chairpersonship
 coaching and
mentoring learners
in competitions
 mentoring pre-
service teachers
 participation in
demonstration
 Mid-
year
Weig Mid-year Review Rating Review
ht Results
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification
per
KRA Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal)
Performan
Ratin Remar
ce Target Rating Remarks
g ks
teaching
 participation as
research presenter
in a forum/
conference
 others ( please
specify and provide
annotations)

VERNA MAE M. LABOGA ALOU MAE P. RAGANIT DENNIS P. DAGAMI

Master Teacher I Teacher - I Principal-II
Rater Ratee Approving Authority