551894997.

xlsx
Interim Submission 1 Grade

Submission Grade Grade Comments

Report section / Points possible Exemplary (Analysis) Satisfactory (reporting) Unsatisfactory (cut and paste)

Expected content elements Covers all expected content, satisfactory Covers all expected content Missing section, missing content or fails to deliver
expectations, plus the expected content

Company Overview /5 5 3-4 2-0

Include brief history, specific products/services
produced and other key statistics you see as relevant Lead in sentence lets reader know what will be
covered
Concise summary with relevant facts about the
company that an investor would find useful Generally, a random set of facts about the company. 5
to the overview
Relevance of the facts presented to an investor is Information is either out of date, irrelevant, or of Good work here
explained. limited importance
Appropriate section conclusion and transition Evidence of cut and paste
Good readability Missing citations

Company Situation /10 8-10 5-8 5 -0

SWOT Analysis Explains what PESTEL and SWOT are and why these Section is introduced with a summary of what will be Evidence that each PESTEL and/or SWOT were taken
analysis tools were used covered directly from a single source
PESTEL Analysis Transition statement which connects company Only 2-3 sources cited for PESTEL and SWOT Lack of evidence of analysis 8.5
situation with the companies’ strategic direction

Critical Issues Complete picture of the industry and company’s Too much focus on company not industry Information used to compile is dated
situation within the industry.

Critical Issues relevant but do not flow out of PESTEL

Implications Minimum of 5 sources cited for PESTEL and SWOT and SWOT Critical issues are superficial (i.e. not critical)

No intro statement.

SWOT - Some minor sources issues. Need to

Critical Issues flow out of PESTEL and SWOT
explain more to the reader. Is VTB Bank owned
by Alibaba?(3/4)
Implications provided but not related to critical issues Implications not provided. PESTEL - issues with a couple of sources.
(3.5/4)
Critical issues - Good work (2/2)

Implications must flow from Critical Issues Missing citations

References /3 3 2 1

Document is formatted using the APA style guide – Formatting and citing is generally good but could use
APA formatted perfect or near perfect more independent sources Over reliance on company material for the report 2.5

Variety of sources Variety of sources used Missing elements from a few sources Sources not acknowledged
Some issues with italics.
Also provide permalinks for EBSCO sources

-cited within the report Limited number of sources

Many areas where citing is absent

Many sources are not properly formatted

Deductions

Writing / Overall Appearance 0 -2 to -4 -5

 551894997.xlsx
Interim Submission 1 Grade
(up to 5-mark deduction) Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness

Clarity and conciseness Argument effectively and efficiently conveyed; highly Argument reasonably clear; occasionally misses the Main point and/or argument confused/unclear.
point but answers the question; not over-elaborate or Irrelevant information, no transition between ideas.
focused on the question; easily understood. over-complicated. Unclear conclusion.
Answers the question, succinct, appropriate Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills:
complexity.

Technical writing skills: Very few spelling errors, correct punctuation, Occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation, grammar, Numerous spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that
grammatically correct, complete sentences. but not enough to seriously distract the reader. interfere with understanding.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Vocabulary: Vocabulary: Vocabulary:
Highly appropriate, well chosen, precise and varied Generally appropriate vocabulary; not overly Excessively limited or inappropriate or repetitive
Vocabulary: vocabulary. Consistently uses correct word choice and repetitive. Generally, uses correct word choice and
vocabulary. Misuses discipline-specific terminology.
discipline-specific terminology. discipline-specific terminology.
Originality, breadth, appropriateness, variety. Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation:
Completely different fonts for each section,
Consistent fonts throughout, proper use of Changing fonts, inconsistent use of indentation,
Visual Presentation: indentation, proper page and line breaks awkward page and line breaks inconsistent use of indentation, no headings or sub
sections (i.e. one long paragraph)
Consistent professional look and feel. Attention to
detail demonstrated
Total

Total 16 Out of 18
Comments:

Submission Grade
Report section / Points possible Exemplary (Analysis)
Covers all expected content, satisfactory
Expected content elements
expectations, plus
Table of Contents Outline / 1 1 -0.5
Must include headings/subheadings as well as page Clean looking matching fonts
numbers to direct a reader to the relevant sections.
Sub headings used effectively
Strategic Direction / 8 7-8
Discussion of the connection between strategic
Vision Statement direction of company and the situation the company Section is introduced with a summary of what will be No explanation of what the purpose of the section is
it finds itself in. covered
Guides the reader with an explanation of the
Mission Statement purpose of the vision and mission statements and
their connection to the company strategic objectives
Long Term Objectives Objectives are identified (and measurable)
Strategies are properly identified and linked back to
Key Strategies
appropriate objective.
Is the strategic direction appropriate?
Is it being followed? State and cite evidence.
Section summary and transition statement
Organizational Structure / 7 6-7
Discusses effectiveness of the organizational
structure – Does it support the strategic direction?
Organization
Are there any issues with the structure that the
investor should know about? Justify
Organizational chart is provided and validated from Board summary presented but missing discussion of Cut and paste list of board members with no
Board of Directors
credible sources
CEO Profile Departmentalization is properly identified.
Alternative departmentalization is discussed.
Comparative salary review of CEO
Analysis of the worth of the CEO (i.e. is his/her
salary justified given company performance)
Reviews board independence and make up
Leadership style of CEO discussed
Section summary and transition statement
References /3 3 2
Interim Submission 2 Grade
551894997.xlsx
Grade Comments
Satisfactory (reporting) Unsatisfactory (cut and paste)
Missing section, missing content or fails to deliver
Covers all expected content
the expected content
-1
One of the following: Missing completely or incomplete 1
o   Missing sub headings or report sections Issues with more than one element
o   Font inconsistency
5-6 4-0
Analysis of statements is superficial Information used to compile is dated 6.5
Objective and strategies confused (i.e. strategies
Evidence of cut and paste
incorrectly identified as objectives)
Mission, vision and value - nice work
Objective and goals - Where are these goals
coming from? Who said this was their goal and
where did they say it? A few sources missing
No analysis of statements provided
Objectives and/or strategies missing
Missing citations
4-5 3-0
Section is introduced with a summary of what will
No explanation of what the purpose of the section is
be covered
Org structure - nice but you will likely have to
shorten this in the final copay
independence analysis Culture - good but some stuff should be moved
Comparative salary review of CEO presented but not Org chart copied from unverified sources (e.g. to org structure
6 BOD - provide examples of the companies the
analyzed Official Board, Cogmap) and not validated
board members work for.
  CEO not discussed CEO - okay
Compensation - more needed here. Can you
Alternative departmentalization not provided Missing citations find historical information on the CEO's salary
and compensation?
Leadership style not discussed
1
Don't add sources at the end of a paragraph
and assume it applies the the entire preceding
paragraph. Each thought must the be cited or
you have to start the paragraph with a report
phrase.
 Interim Submission 2 Grade
551894997.xlsx

APA formatted Document is formatted using the APA style guide – Formatting and citing is generally good but could use Over reliance on company material for the report
perfect or near perfect more independent sources

Don't add sources at the end of a paragraph

and assume it applies the the entire preceding
paragraph. Each thought must the be cited or
you have to start the paragraph with a report
Variety of sources Variety of sources used Missing elements from a few sources Sources not acknowledged 3 phrase.

-cited within the report Limited number of sources

Many areas where citing is absent
Many sources are not properly formatted

Deductions

Writing / Overall Appearance 0 -2 to -4 -5

(up to 5-mark deduction) Clarity and conciseness
Argument effectively and efficiently conveyed;
Clarity and conciseness
highly focused on the question; easily understood.
Answers the question, succinct, appropriate
Technical writing skills:
complexity.
Very few spelling errors, correct punctuation,
Technical writing skills:
grammatically correct, complete sentences.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Vocabulary:
Highly appropriate, well chosen, precise and varied
Vocabulary: vocabulary. Consistently uses correct word choice
and discipline-specific terminology.
Originality, breadth, appropriateness, variety. Visual Presentation:
Consistent fonts throughout, proper use of
Visual Presentation:
indentation, proper page and line breaks
Consistent professional look and feel. Attention to
detail demonstrated
DEDUCTIONS For Failing to Incorporate
Feedback from Submission 1
Company Overview Feedback Up to 5 Deduction 0 to -2
All or most feedback incorporated
Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness
Argument reasonably clear; occasionally misses the Main point and/or argument confused/unclear.
point but answers the question; not over-elaborate Irrelevant information, no transition between ideas.
or over-complicated. Unclear conclusion.
Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills:
Numerous spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
Occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation, grammar,
punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that
but not enough to seriously distract the reader.
interfere with understanding.
Vocabulary: Vocabulary:
Generally appropriate vocabulary; not overly
Excessively limited or inappropriate or repetitive
repetitive. Generally, uses correct word choice and
vocabulary. Misuses discipline-specific terminology.
discipline-specific terminology.
Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation:
Completely different fonts for each section,
Changing fonts, inconsistent use of indentation,
inconsistent use of indentation, no headings or sub
awkward page and line breaks
sections (i.e. one long paragraph)
-3 to -4 -5
Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

Company Situation Feedback Up to 10 Deduction 0 to -4 -5 to -8 -9 to -10 Improved

All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback 0.5

Total

Total 17 Out of 18
Comments:
 Interim Submission 3 Grade
551894997.xlsx

Submission Grade Grade Comments

Report section / Points possible Exemplary (Analysis) Satisfactory (reporting) Unsatisfactory (cut and paste)
Covers all expected content, satisfactory expectations, Missing section, missing content or fails to deliver the
Expected content elements plus Covers all expected content expected content Grade 50% individually

Title Page / 2 2 1 0
The title should provide the reader with a solid Generally ok but lacks the look of a professional Missing more than one element such as your group
impression of what to expect in your report. Logo for your consulting company document name or group member names 1.5
What type of analysis?
Polished professional look Missing one element Missing citations
Authors and date included

Financial Performance /8 7-8 5-6 4-0

Information is presented in a format that allows the

Three Year Trend Analysis of Company Information reader to quickly asses the financial health of the Section is introduced with a summary of what will be Missing parts or all of the expected content 6
covered This analysis is very thorough but repeats a lot
company in comparison to its industry peers. of numbers in the chart. Stick to telling me you
observed e.g. both revenue and net income
Each chart has an explanation guiding the reader to have increased by 50% per year in very basic
Three Year Trend Analysis of Key Ratios Appropriate use of charts or infographics Financial data out dated or incomplete terms (don't repeat numbers in the chart) and
what is significant
then explain why. This will shorten this section
Company information is analyzed as a trend over the considerably while still making the same
Comparative Financial Analysis with a key competitor past 3 years. Key ratios or information is identified and Minimal or incorrect analysis of ratios provided. Ratio’s incorrectly calculated points.
discussed. Comparison - you can ONLY compare based on
Key competitor information is discussed in direct ratios!!! If you look at ratios, Amazon is clearly
comparison to company information. Key ratios or the best bet but their D/E is concerning.
information is identified and discussed. A conclusion Charts not titled Though Amazons Return on Sale is lower they
about the better performing company is provided. seem to making up for low margins with a high
volume of sales since their ROE and EPS are
Section summary and transition statement Mismatch of currencies or decimal points much higher. Tencent is more interesting in
that in some ways they are better than Alibaba
and some ways worse. You should decide
which items you consider most valuable and
decide based on that.
Missing citations

Deductions

Writing / Overall Appearance 0 -2 to -4 -5

(up to 5-mark deduction) Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness
Argument reasonably clear; occasionally misses the Main point and/or argument confused/unclear.
Clarity and conciseness Argument effectively and efficiently conveyed; highly point but answers the question; not over-elaborate or Irrelevant information, no transition between ideas.
focused on the question; easily understood.
over-complicated. Unclear conclusion.
Answers the question, succinct, appropriate
Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills:
complexity.
Numerous spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
Technical writing skills: Very few spelling errors, correct punctuation, Occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation, grammar, punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that
grammatically correct, complete sentences. but not enough to seriously distract the reader. interfere with understanding.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Vocabulary: Vocabulary: Vocabulary:
Highly appropriate, well chosen, precise and varied Generally appropriate vocabulary; not overly
Excessively limited or inappropriate or repetitive
Vocabulary: vocabulary. Consistently uses correct word choice and repetitive. Generally, uses correct word choice and vocabulary. Misuses discipline-specific terminology.
discipline-specific terminology. discipline-specific terminology.
Originality, breadth, appropriateness, variety. Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation:

Consistent fonts throughout, proper use of Changing fonts, inconsistent use of indentation, Completely different fonts for each section,
Visual Presentation: indentation, proper page and line breaks awkward page and line breaks inconsistent use of indentation, no headings or sub
sections (i.e. one long paragraph)
Consistent professional look and feel. Attention to
detail demonstrated
References Deduction up to 5 marks 0 -2 to -4 -5

APA formatted Variety of sources used Formatting and citing is generally good but could use Over reliance on company material for the report
more independent sources
Variety of sources All sources properly formatted Missing elements from a few sources Sources not acknowledged
-cited within the report Limited number of sources
Many areas where citing is absent
 Interim Submission 3 Grade
551894997.xlsx
Many sources are not properly formatted
DEDUCTIONS For Failing to Incorporate
Feedback from Submission 1
Company Overview Feedback Up to 5 Deduction 0 to -2 -3 to -4 -5
All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

Company Situation Feedback Up to 10 Deduction 0 to -4 -5 to -8 -9 to -10

All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

DEDUCTIONS For Failing to Incorporate

Feedback from Submission 2

Strategic Direction Up to 8 Deduction 0 to -2 -3 to -5 -5-8 0.5 Sources added

All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

Organizational Structure Up to 8 Deduction 0 to -2 -3 to -5 -5-8

All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

Total

Total 8 Out of 10
Comments:

4 Out of 5 (Group grade)

Individual Contritbion
Constance

I see your contribution but also see lots of

contributions from others on the team 4 Out of 5 (Individual grade) 8 Out of 10 (Group +Individual
grade)

Comments:

Marcy

I see your contribution but also see lots of Out of 10 (Group +Individual
contributions from others on the team 4 Out of 5 (Individual grade) 8 grade)

Comments:
Amritpal

8 Out
I see your contribution but also see lots of of 10 (Group +Individual
contributions from others on the team 4 Out of 5 (Individual grade) grade)
Comments:
Armaan

8 Out
I see your contribution but also see lots of of 10 (Group +Individual
contributions from others on the team 4 Out of 5 (Individual grade)
grade)
Comments:
 Interim Submission 4 Grade
551894997.xlsx

Submission Grade Grade Comments

Report section / Points possible Exemplary (Analysis) Satisfactory (reporting) Unsatisfactory (cut and paste)
Covers all expected content, satisfactory Missing section, missing content or fails to deliver
Expected content elements
expectations, plus
Covers all expected content
the expected content Grade 50% individually

Cover letter / 1 1 0.5 0

Occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation,
Address the letter to your client Cover letter signed by all group members grammar, but not enough to seriously distract the Missing content
reader.
Numerous spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
Include the report’s purpose and a brief description No spelling errors, correct punctuation,
punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that 1
of the report grammatically correct, complete sentences
interfere with understanding.
Good readability Missing citations

Executive Summary / 3 3 2-1 0

Summarizes ALL aspects including the
Page length 1 ½ - 2 pages maximum (separate
recommendation of the report in a concise, well
page(s))
written manner
Readability negatively impacted by numerous
spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
Summary misses’ important points from the report 3
punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that
interfere with understanding

Readability hindered by occasional lapses in

Write the summary last after the report is finished
Highlight the report’s main points/ideas and
conclusions
No spelling errors, correct punctuation, Failure to state recommendation
spelling, punctuation, grammar, but not enough to
grammatically correct, complete sentences
seriously distract the reader.
Good readability Failure to include sections from analysis body

View the summary as a “substitute” for the report

Table of Contents / 2 2 1 0

Must include headings/subheadings as well as page

Clean looking matching fonts One of the following: Missing completely or incomplete 2
numbers to direct a reader to the relevant sections.

The introduction begins on Page 1 Sub headings used effectively o   Missing sub headings or report sections No page numbers
Proper right alignment of page number o   Font inconsistency Issues with more than one element
Introduction begins on Page 1 o   Page numbers not properly aligned Missing citations

List of Figures / 1 1 0.5 0

The list of figures appears on its own page. It offers a
list of the figures or illustrations that appear in the
Covers all expected content Missing 1 or 2 charts or diagrams Missing or incomplete elements 1
body of the report along with their corresponding
page numbers
Neat professional layout Titles not meaningful Missing citations

Figures properly titled for reader to understand Title in List of Figures does not match title of figure
in the report body.
Figure numbering and titles consistent between this
page and actual figure in the report body

Introduction / 3 3 2-1 0
The purpose and objective of the report is made
Provide brief explanation of what the report The purpose and objective of the report is made
clear, and the report addresses the objective(s) in a The report does not clearly address the objective 3
contains. clear, and the report addresses the objective(s).
focused and logical manner.

Provide the reader with background i.e. what The process used to create the report (e.g. sources
Missing the process followed. Missing citations
prompted this report. of information, scope, etc.) is clear to the reader

State the purpose of the report i.e. what the report Reader is guided into the next section of the report
is meant to do. with a transition statement
Inform the reader of the scope of this report i.e.
what the report will contain and what it will not.
Marketing Strategy /7 6-7 4-5 3-0
Provides an analysis of the marketing strategy in Section is not introduced with a summary of what No explanation of what the purpose of the section
Product Lines and Mix 7
relation to the companies’ strategic direction. will be covered is

Nice work here

 Interim Submission 4 Grade
551894997.xlsx

Missing analysis of one or more of Product Lines

Analysis on each of the Product Lines and Mix,
Marketing Mix Analysis and Mix, Marketing Mix Analysis, Target Market and Cut and paste list of products Nice work here
Marketing Mix Analysis, Target Market and 4 Ps.
4 Ps
Target Market Section summary and transition statement No analysis
4 Ps Missing citations
Position
Company Outlook /4 3-4 2-3 1-0

Your Forecast Forward looking forecast which is clearly link Section is introduced with a summary of what will Missing your or an analyst forecasts 3
between your forecast and facts contained in report be covered
Repeated paragraph
More than one analyst needed
Analysts Forecast Minimum of three appropriate analyst forecasts Forecast is provided but not supported Analyst forecast is not current
Section summary and transition statement Minimum of three appropriate analyst forecasts Missing citations

Recommendation /8 8-7 6-4 4 -0

Fully explain your recommendation.
Justified by the FACTS provided in the report.
ALL aspects of the report are discussed as part of Conclusions are relevant and portray the results of Conclusions/Recommendations do not clearly flow
8
the recommendation. the document. from the document, and/or miss key findings.
Recommendations are specific action-oriented Conclusions/ Recommendations logically flow from
They are not well organised, and are not presented
suggestions, providing the investor with a plausible the document but the logic may not always be clear
in a clear, itemised format.
investment strategy. or justified.

Conclusions/ recommendations logically flow from

the document in a manner which is evident to the
Based on all aspects of your report.
reader. They are presented in a clear, itemised
format.

1 0.5 0
Generally good but some content should have been No appendix included or the appendix contained
Appropriate use of appendices
in the main body irrelevant or unimportant content
Appendices /1
Each appendix is referenced within the body of the
paper

Deductions

Writing / Overall Appearance 0 -2 to -4 -5

(up to 5-mark deduction) Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness Clarity and conciseness
Argument reasonably clear; occasionally misses the Main point and/or argument confused/unclear.
Clarity and conciseness Argument effectively and efficiently conveyed;
point but answers the question; not over-elaborate Irrelevant information, no transition between ideas.
highly focused on the question; easily understood.
or over-complicated. Unclear conclusion.
Answers the question, succinct, appropriate
Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills: Technical writing skills:
complexity.
Numerous spelling errors, non-existent or incorrect
Very few spelling errors, correct punctuation, Occasional lapses in spelling, punctuation, grammar,
Technical writing skills: punctuation, and/or severe errors in grammar that
grammatically correct, complete sentences. but not enough to seriously distract the reader.
interfere with understanding.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation, etc. Vocabulary: Vocabulary: Vocabulary:
Highly appropriate, well chosen, precise and varied Generally appropriate vocabulary; not overly
Vocabulary: Excessively limited or inappropriate or repetitive
vocabulary. Consistently uses correct word choice repetitive. Generally, uses correct word choice and
vocabulary. Misuses discipline-specific terminology.
and discipline-specific terminology. discipline-specific terminology.
Originality, breadth, appropriateness, variety. Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation: Visual Presentation:
Completely different fonts for each section,
Consistent fonts throughout, proper use of Changing fonts, inconsistent use of indentation,
Visual Presentation: inconsistent use of indentation, no headings or sub
indentation, proper page and line breaks awkward page and line breaks
sections (i.e. one long paragraph)
Consistent professional look and feel. Attention to
detail demonstrated
References Deduction up to 5 marks 0 -2 to -4 -5
Formatting and citing is generally good but could use
APA formatted Variety of sources used Over reliance on company material for the report
more independent sources
Variety of sources All sources properly formatted Missing elements from a few sources Sources not acknowledged
-cited within the report Limited number of sources
Many areas where citing is absent
Many sources are not properly formatted
 Interim Submission 4 Grade
551894997.xlsx

Title Page Up to 2 Deduction 0 -1 -2

The title should provide the reader with a solid
All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback -1 Missing date
impression of what to expect in your report.

DEDUCTIONS For Failing to Incorporate

Feedback from Submissions, 1, 2 and 3
Financial Performance Up to 8 Deduction 0 to -4 -5 to -6 -7 to -8
All or most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback 1 Improved

Other sections Up to 10 Deduction 0 to -3 -3 to -6 -7 to-10

Most feedback incorporated Only some of the feedback incorporated Little or no changes based on feedback

Total

Total 28 Out of 30
Comments:
 551894997.xlsx

Grading Rubric for BUS 100 Presentation:

Group Members: ______________________________________________________
Corporation: __________________________________________________________

Criteria Comments
Possible Score Actual Score

Presentation Skills
Appropriate appearance? (i.e., no backwards caps,
3 3
gum chewing, etc.)
Effective transitions?
3 3

Maintained your interest?

3 3

Managed their time well?

3 3

Effectively answered all questions

3 3

SUBTOTAL (PRESENTATION): Out of 15 15

Slides and Technolgy

Criteria Comments
Possible Score Actual Score

Readability? (i.e., large enough text?) Hard to read CEO comparison

4 3

Correct grammar and spelling?

3 3

Good use of visual effects (i.e., graphics, charts,

photos, colour, special effects, etc., that got your 4 4
attention in a positive way)

Covered the appropriate content? Had enough

Need more explanation on PPMB, PSUs and
slides? Didn’t stay on one slide too long? Kept the 4 3
presentation moving? Tencent

SUBTOTAL (SLIDES): 15 13
 551894997.xlsx

Content
Criteria Comments
Possible Score Actual Score

Nice summary
Understanding of critical issues facing the company
10 10
or industry

Understanding of strategic direction of the company 10 10

Understanding of the company structure and

10 10
leadership

Understanding of the marketing effort 10 10

Understanding of the financial situation 10 10

Recommendation New points brought up here which should

already have been mentioned- stock price
10 7
(show me).
Natural disasters not relevant
SUBTOTAL (CONTENT): 60 57

TOTAL: 90 85

Individual Assessment
Name Possible Score Possible Score Comments

Team member 1 10 10

Team member 2 10 10

Team member 3 10 9 Speak a little louder

Team member 4 10 10

Total
Name Possible Score Possible Score Individual Grade out of 16
Team member 1 100 95 15.2
Team member 2 100 95 15.2
Team member 3 100 94 15.04
Team member 4 100 95 15.2
 551894997.xlsx

Final Grade Calculation

Group of 3
Total
Final Group Question Adjustment (up BEFORE Peer
Name Submission 1 Submission 2 Submission 3 Submission 4 Presentation Presentation to 10%) Multiplier
18% 18% 10% 30% 16% 8% 100%
16 17 8 28

Team member 1
16 17 8 28 15.2 6.72 90.92
Team member 2 16 17 8 28 15.2 7.64 91.84
Team member 3 16 17 8 28 15.04 6.64 90.68
Team member 4 16 17 8 28 15.2 7.52 91.72

Final Grade with Peer Multiplier

Peer Scores 25%
Teammate 1 Teammate 2 Teammate 3 Teammate 4 Total
Team member 1 38 39 30 25 132 98.1936
Team member 2 34 39 25 25 123 97.1208
Team member 3 10 17 20 25 72 84.3324
Team member 4 18 5 25 25 73 85.5289