Professional Documents
Culture Documents
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
Dr. Shamik Basak
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
Assistant Professor
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
ec
or
fM
Ro
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, India
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
1
Reference books
g.
ng
k
E
1. “Plasticity of Mechanical Engineers” by W.Jhonson and
sa
al
P.B.Meller, Van Nostrand.
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
2. “Manufacturing Science” by A.Ghosh and A.K.Mallik.
In
ha
3. “Metal Forming Mechanics and Metallurgy” by W.F.Hosford
nd
.S
la
and R.M.Caddll.
Dr
ca
4. “The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity” by R.Hill.
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
2
Deformation
g.
Forming is a manufacturing process which can be defined as a process in
ng
which desired shape and size are obtained through plastic deformation
E
sa
al
of a material.
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
Deformation
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
Truly Elastic Anelastic
fM
Ro
deformation deformation
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
3
Stress-strain response
g.
Elastic deformation: An applied stress
Plastic region
ng
Elastic produces an instantaneous elastic strain
E
sa
region that remains constant over the period of
al
Ba
time the stress is maintained. It has also
ri
st
been assumed that upon release of the
ik
du
A’
load the strain is totally recovered: that
In
ha
the strain immediately returns to zero.
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
Elastic material strictly follows Hooke’s
ni
Law (i.e. Stress and strain are
e
ha
ke
proportional)
ec
or
fM
Ro
Typical stress-strain curve for mild steel
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
4
g.
Anelastic deformation: It is time-dependent elastic deformation will
ng
k
continue after the stress application, and upon load release some finite
E
sa
al
time is required for complete recovery.
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
Plastic deformation: As the material is deformed beyond elastic limit,
ni
the stress is no longer proportional to strain (Hooke’s law, ceases to be
e
ha
ke
valid), and permanent, non-recoverable, or plastic deformation
ec
or
fM
occurs.
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
5
Tensile test
g.
ng
k
E
Specimen
sa
al
nomenclature
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
Typical specimens
De
Metal Forming
6
De Dr
pt .S
.o ha
fM m
ec ik
ha Ba
ni sa
ca k
la
Tensile test
IIT nd
Ro In
or du
ke st
e ri al
E ng
g.
7
Metal Forming
De Dr
pt .S
.o ha
fM m
ec ik
ha Ba
ni sa
ca k
la
Tensile test
IIT nd
Ro In
or du
ke st
e ri al
E ng
g.
8
Metal Forming
Stress-strain response
g.
Plastic region OA: Proportionality limit
ng
Elastic
k
Linear, Elastic region, Hooke’s law is valid
E
sa
region
al
Ba
AA’: Non-Linear Elastic region
ri
st
ik
du
A’ B: Upper yield point
In
ha
Stress at pt. B known as Yield Stress (YS)
nd
.S
C: Lower yield point
la
Dr
ca
After Pt. B withdrawal of loading the
ni
deformation exists in the specimen
e
ha
ke
ec
D: Ultimate tensile strength (UTS)
or
fM
Ro
E: Failure point
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
9
Plastic deformation
g.
Elastic deformation Plastic deformation
ng
k
E
Reversible Not revisable
sa
al
Depends on initial and final states of Depends on loading path
Ba
ri
st
stress and strain
ik
du
Stress is proportional to strain Stress and strain are non proportional
In
ha
No strain hardening effects Strain hardening exists
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
Elastic region <<< Plastic region
ni
e
ha So elastic region can be neglected
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
Plastic Zone I : Uniform deformation
.o
region
IIT
Zone II + Zone III : Non-uniform deformation
pt
De
Metal Forming
10
Stress-strain response
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
materials
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
11
Stress-strain response
Difference in calculation of yield strength of the material
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
Ductile material Brittle material
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
12
Stress-strain calculations
g.
A0
ng
k
E
F
sa
al
Ba
ri
L0 ΔL
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
F
nd
Engineering stress = S =
.S
A0
la
Dr
ca
ΔL
ni
Engineering strain = e =
e
ha
ke
L0
ec
or
But in Engineering stress/strain calculation length of the specimen is constant which is
fM
Ro
not true case.
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
13
Concept of True Stress-strain
g.
Considering no material loss (constant volume before and after deformation)
ng
A . L = A0 . L0 A0 L L0 + ΔL
E
= = = 1+e
sa
al
A L0 L0
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
F F A0
m
= σ = S (1 + e)
In
True stress = σ =
ha
A A0 A
nd
.S dL
la
Dr
True strain at an instant = dε =
ca
L
ni
Lf
e
Upon integrating ε = ln
ha
ke
L0
ec
or
fM
Ro
True strain ε = ln(1+e)
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
14
Comparison
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
ε = ln(1+e)= e - e2/2! + e3/3! …..
e
ha
ke
ec
or
If e value is very small then, ε
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
15
Why True Stress-strain diagram is needed?
g.
• Engineering stress and strain are useful for many engineering design applications.
ng
k
E
sa
• Computation of stress and strain is based on initial area or gauge length and therefore
al
engineering stress and strain represent only approximations of the real stress and strain
Ba
ri
st
in plastic zone.
ik
du
m
In
• In elastic deformation region (where dimensional changes are small and negligible) the
ha
initial and instantaneous areas are approximately same and hence true stress
nd
.S
equals engineering stress. Therefore, in design problems where large dimensional
la
Dr
changes do not occur, the use of engineering stress is sufficiently accurate and
ca
used extensively as it is easier to measure.
ni
e
ha
ke
• However, for metal working where large plastic deformations occur and are
ec
or
necessary, the approximations inherent in engineering stress and strain values are
fM
Ro
unacceptable. For this reason, the true stress and true strains are used.
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
16
De Dr
pt .S
.o ha
fM m
ec ik
ha Ba
ni sa
ca k
la
Comparison
IIT nd
Ro In
or du
ke st
e ri al
E ng
g.
17
Metal Forming
De Dr
pt .S
.o ha
fM m
ec ik
ha Ba
ni sa
ca k
la
Comparison
IIT nd
Ro In
or du
ke st
e ri al
E ng
g.
18
Metal Forming
Flow stress
g.
• Metal forming operations involve plastic deformation of materials.
ng
k
• The stress required to sustain a given amount of plastic deformation (plastic strain) is called flow
E
sa
al
stress.
Ba
ri
st
• Flow stress is an important parameter in forming.
ik
du
m
In
• It depends on type of material, temperature of working, conditions of friction at work piece–tool
ha
nd
.S
interface, tool and work piece geometry etc.
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
19
Flow stress
g.
• True stress-strain curve does not indicate any yield
ng
k
point.
E
sa
al
• It also does not show in any elastic region
Ba
ri
st
• The total area under the true stress strain curve is
ik
du
m
In
known as toughness
ha
nd
.S • The true stress-strain relation in the plastic region is
la
Dr
given by power law relationship which is known as
ca
ni
Hollomon power hardening law
e
ha
ke
σ = K εn
ec
or
Here K is the strength coefficient and n is the power hardening exponent.
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
• Stress required, σ in plastic range to maintain plastic deformation at a certain strain, ε is
pt
called flow stress. K, the strength coefficient is the value of stress σ, under ε=1.
De
Metal Forming
20
Incompressibility
g.
ng
Initial volume of the billet
E
sa
al
Volume change during metal forming
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
ln(V/V0) = ln(L w t / L0 w0 t0)
In
ha
= ln(L/L0) + ln(w/w0) + ln(t/t0)
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
= εl + εw + εt
ni
e
ha
Volume remain constant during metal forming ln(V/V0)= 0
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
εl + εw + εt = 0
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
21
Anisotropy
g.
Mechanical properties are different along different directions
ng
k
E
sa
εl = ln(L / L0) εw = ln(w / w0) εt = ln(t / t0)
al
w
Ba
ri
st
εw = εt
ik
For isotropic material,
du
L
In
ha
t εl + 2εw = 0 εw = -0.5 εl = εt
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
Anisotropy of the material is defined by the ratio R which is known as
ni
e
ha
Lankford anisotropy parameter (R)
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
R = εw / εt
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
22
Anisotropy
g.
ng
900 R0 , R45 and R90 are the anisotropy value along
450
E
sa
al
three different directions.
Ba
ri
st
ik
R0 ≠ R45 ≠ R90 for a rolled sheet
du
m
In
ha
00
nd
.S Average normal anisotropy
la
Dr
ca
Planar anisotropy ΔR = (R0 - 2 R45 + R90) / 2
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
For isotropic material, R0 = R45 = R90 = 1. ΔR = 0
or
fM
Ro
.o
Metal Forming
23
Q. A bar of 10 cm length is elongated to 20 cm by rolling in three steps.
g.
10 cm to 12 cm, 12 cm to 15 cm and 15 cm to 20 cm
ng
k
E
a) Calculate Engg. Strain for each step and compare the sum of thi with
sa
al
the overall engg. strain
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
b) Repeat the same for true strain and NOTE the DIFFERENCES
In
ha
nd
a) Engg. Strain = e1 = 2/10 = 0.2
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
eoverall = 10/10 = 1.0
or
fM
Ro
.o
eoverall ≠ e1 + e2 + e3
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
24
Q. A bar of 10 cm length is elongated to 20 cm by rolling in three steps.
g.
10 cm to 12 cm, 12 cm to 15 cm and 15 cm to 20 cm
ng
k
E
a) Calculate Engg. Strain for each step and compare the sum of thi with
sa
al
the overall engg. strain
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
b) Repeat the same for true strain and NOTE the DIFFERENCES
In
ha
nd
.S
b) True Strain = ε1 = ln(12/10) = 0.182
εoverall = 20/10= 0.693
la
Dr
ca
ε2 = ln(15/12) = 0.223,
ni
eoverall ≠ e1 + e2 + e3
e
ha
ε3 = ln(20/15) = 0.288
ke
ec
or
εoverall = ε1 + ε2 + ε3
fM
0.693
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
25
Strain hardening
g.
ng
• The test piece is loaded beyond point 2
E
sa
(yield pt) up to pt 3 and then unloaded.
al
Ba
Work
ri
st
• Elastic deformation recovers via the
hardening
ik
du
unloading line 3-4 which is parallel to
In
ha
1-2.
nd
.S
4 • 4-5 is the elastic recovery
la
5
Dr
ca
• 1-4 permanent deformation
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
26
Strain hardening
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
Work
ri
st
hardening
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
4
la
5
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
• Now if we reload the same test piece so it will follow the line 4-3.
or
fM
Ro
• Now NEW YIELDING POINT is 3. So material got strain-hardened / work-
.o
hardened
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
27
Strain hardening (Cont.)
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
Zone I Zone II
ca
ni
eu
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
Zone I : Uniform deformation
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
28
Strain hardening (Cont.)
g.
During uniaxial deformation of a metal two simultaneous phenomenon takes place
ng
k
E
sa
1. Increase in load bearing capacity due to strain hardening
al
Ba
ri
2. Decrease in load bearing capacity due to decrease in cross-sectional area
st
ik
du
m
Zone I : Phenomenon (1) is dominating over (2). Load bearing capacity increases
In
ha
nd
.S
Zone II : Phenomenon (2) is dominating over (1). Load bearing capacity decreases
la
Dr
ca
It is observed that in zone I stress-strain follow the non-linear hardening law
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
σ = K εn (Hollomon Power hardening law)
or
fM
Ro
.o
Metal Forming
29
Bauschinger effect
g.
2 • The specimen in loaded in tension up to pt 2
ng
1
which is beyond the yield pt 1
E
sa
al
• Subsequently unloaded to pt 3
Ba
ri
st
3
ik
• Again loaded in the reverse direction i.e. the
du
m
specimen is now compressed
In
ha
nd
4 .S • In compression, the specimen yields at pt 4.
la
Dr
So the stress at pt 4 is the yield strength under
ca
compression
ni
e
• ha
It can be observed that the yield strength in compression has decreased due to
ke
ec
previous plastic strain in tension.
or
fM
Ro
• Similarly the yield strength in tension would decrease with previous compressive
.o
plastic strain
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
30
Experimental determination of n
g.
lnσ = lnK + n lnε
ng
σ = K εn
E
sa
al
lnσ
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S lnε
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
• Typical value of n is 0-0.5 for conventional materials
or
fM
Ro
• For metal forming we required uniform deformation as longer as possible
.o
• IIT
True strain in the uniform deformation zone εu
pt
De
Metal Forming
31
Typical strain hardening behavior
g.
ng
A σ Rigid perfectly plastic, figure A – has infinite value of Y, Once stress level
E
Y reaches yielding Y, it continues to deform at same stress level.
sa
al
Rigid (E =infinity, perfectly plastically = no work hardening
Ba
ri
ε
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
Perfectly elastic: Figure – B, Brittle materials such as glass, ceramics, cast
nd
B σ irons etc. show only perfectly elastic behavior. There is very negligible yielding.
.S
Hooke’s law governs the stress-strain relation. Stiffness of such material is
la
Dr
indicated by E.
ca
ε
ni
e
ha
ke
Rigid linear hardening, figure C – has linear hardening value of Y, Once
ec
or
𝜃 stress level reaches yielding Y, it continues to deform at same stress level.
fM
C σ
Ro
Y Rigid (E =infinity, linear hardening, is the tangent modulus )
.o
IIT
pt
ε
De
Metal Forming
32
Typical strain hardening behavior
g.
ng
D σ Elastic, perfectly plastic-figure D - is combination of perfectly elastic and
E
Y rigid plastic. This material will undergo elastic recovery upon unloading. Metals
sa
al
heated to high temperature behave this way. Lead has elastic, perfectly plastic
Ba
ri
ε at room temperature.
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
E σ Elastic, linearly strain hardening material, figure E – It approximates many of
.S
engineering materials. Such material has linear elastic behavior and linear
la
Dr
plastic behavior. Due to strain hardening, the flow stress increases with
ca
ε increasing strain.
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
𝜃 Rigid non-linear hardening, figure F –
σ
.o
ε
Metal Forming
33
Instability
g.
Necking or localized deformation begins at maximum load
ng
where decrease in cross sectional area which hears the load is
E
compensated by increase in strength due in load
sa
al
dF=0
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
We know, F=σA
In
ha
nd
Differentiating .SdF/F = dσ/ σ + dA/A
la
Dr
ca
At the instability point, dF = 0 dσ/ σ = - dA/A 1
ni
e
Again, V= Al = constant ha dV/V = dA/ A + dl/l = 0
ke
ec
or
dA/ A = - dl/l = -dε
fM
Ro
Rearranging dσ/ dε = σ
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
34
Instability
g.
Prove that uniform strain is equal strain hardening
ng
exponent (n)
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
From instability condition we know, dσ/ dε = σ
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
Putting Hollomon equation i.e. σ = K εn
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
d(K εn)/ dε = σ = K εn
ni
e
ha
n K εn-1 = σ = K εn
ke
Differentiating
ec
or
fM
Calculating n=ε εu = n
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
35
Measurement of instability point
g.
First method: Directly from engineering stress strain curve
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
Second method: From true stress strain curve
ca
ni
From instability condition we know,
e
ha
ke
dσ/dε
ec
or
dσ/ dε = σ
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
36
Measurement of instability point
g.
Third method: From true stress vs engineering strain curve
ng
k
E
sa
al
From instability condition we know, dσ/ dε = σ
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
Instability criterion can be rewritten as
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
37
Effect of temperature
g.
New strain-free crystals forms at the recrystallization temperature
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
Tre-crystallization= 1/3 rd to ½ Tmelting
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
Cold forming: Forming at a temperature below the re-crystalline temperature of the
nd
.S
metal. The strain hardening during this process improves the mechanical properties
la
Dr
of the product. Also, the dimensional tolerances can be achieved during this process.
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
Hot forming: Forming at a temperature above the re-crystalline temperature of the
ec
or
metal. High temperatures reduce the flow stress of the materials, which results low
fM
Ro
forming forces.
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
38
Effect of temperature
New strain-free crystals forms at the recrystallization temperature
g.
ng
Tre-crystallization= 1/3 rd to ½ Tmelting
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
With increase in temperature the YS
la
Dr
and UTS decreases and ductility
ca
increases
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
39
Effect of temperature
g.
ng
Advantages of Cold forming
E
sa
al
•Good surface finish of the product.
Ba
ri
st
•High dimensional accuracy
ik
du
m
In
•Superior mechanical properties
ha
nd
.S
•Material develops anisotropy during cold forming process which helps to increase
la
Dr
formability sometimes. Such as during drawing.
ca
ni
Disadvantages of Cold forming
e
ha
ke
•High forming load. High end capacity equipment are required which increases the cost
ec
or
of the machine
fM
Ro
.o
Metal Forming
40
Effect of temperature
g.
ng
Advantages of Hot forming
E
sa
•Material becomes softer therefore the yield strength decreases. This reduces the cot of
al
Ba
ri
the equipment.
st
ik
du
•Ductility of the material increases which help to induce large deformations
In
ha
•Structure becomes more homogeneous resulting better mechanical properties.
nd
.S
la
•Flow strength got lower which help to prepare large components by plastic deformation.
Dr
ca
Disadvantages of Hot forming
ni
e
ha
•Low surface quality due to oxidation of the surface layer
ke
ec
or
•Low dimensional accuracy
fM
Ro
.o
•Forming tools also heated up which increases the rapid wear of the tools.
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
41
Effect of temperature
g.
ng
k
Warm forming: It has been introduced to take the advantage of both the hot and cold
E
sa
al
forming
Ba
ri
st
Forming at a temperature above the room temperature but below the re-crystalline
ik
du
m
temperature of the metal.
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
•Since yield strength decreases the load on the equipment also lessen. Adv. Of CF
ca
•Since temperature not high much, surface finish is better. Adv. Of HF
ni
e
ha
ke
•Tool wear is less for reduced temperature. Adv. Of CF
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
42
Effect of strain rate
g.
Forming load / stress-strain diagram is affected by the deformation rate
ng
k
E
v = crosshead speed
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
Metal Forming
43
Effect of strain rate
g.
ng
With increase in strain rate the YS and UTS increases and ductility decreases
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
Power Law
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
m: strain rate sensitivity index
ni
e
ha
ke
C : Strength constant
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
44
Combined power law
g.
Hollomon Power hardening law σ = K εn
ng
k
E
sa
Power law
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
Combined power law
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
If the material has no strain rate sensitivity then m=0, so the combined power
ni
e
law reduces to Hollomon hardening law
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
45
Effect of strain rate
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
m: strain rate sensitivity index
fM
Ro
.o
C : Strength constant
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
46
Effect of strain rate
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
If m is less, material is not sensitive
In
ha
If m is more, material is sensitive to strain rates
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
Strain rate at uniform region
fM
Ro
.o
Metal Forming
47
Effect of strain rate
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
𝑨𝒏
Let us consider two scenario, m1=0.02, m2=0.5 for a constant ratio
ik
du
𝑨𝒖
In
ha
nd
First case, .S
la
Dr
ca
Second case,
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
First case indicates that uniform region gets less strain rate. Hence neck region gets more strain
Ro
.o
Second case indicates that strain rate in the neck region gets transfer to the uniform region
De
Metal Forming
48
Effect of strain rate
g.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
• If m is high, the elongation is also more before fracture because strain is
fM
Ro
transmitting to uniform region from neck region.
.o
IIT
pt
Metal Forming
49
Work done during plastic deformation
g.
A bar of cross-section area ‘a’ and length l0, and elongated to l.
ng
k
E
sa
al
Ba
ri
st
ik
du
m
In
ha
nd
.S
la
Dr
ca
ni
e
ha
ke
ec
or
fM
Ro
Work done
.o
IIT
pt
De
Metal Forming
50
De Dr
pt .S
.o ha
fM m
ec ik
ha Ba
ni sa
ca k
la
IIT nd
Thank you!
Ro In
or du
ke st
e ri al
E ng
g.
Metal Forming
51