Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • UTSSPK 2012510158 Intan Rosiana

    Uploaded by

    Intan Rosiana
    6 views2 pages
    This document summarizes two cases using different decision making methods. The first case uses the Bayes method to rank three motorcycle options based on attributes. It ranks Yamaha Mio first, followed by Suzuki Spin, then Honda Vario. The second case uses the Composite Performance Index method to rank four city options as locations for a warehouse based on distance, rental costs, electricity capacity, and building area. It ranks Purwakarta first, followed by Bandung, then Bogor, with Karawang ranked last.

    Original Description:

    SOAL UTS SISTEM PENUNJANG KEPUTUSAN

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes two cases using different decision making methods. The first case uses the Bayes method to rank three motorcycle options based on attributes. It ranks Yamaha Mio first, followed by Suzuki Spin, then Honda Vario. The second case uses the Composite Performance Index method to rank four city options as locations for a warehouse based on distance, rental costs, electricity capacity, and building area. It ranks Purwakarta first, followed by Bandung, then Bogor, with Karawang ranked last.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views2 pages

    UTSSPK 2012510158 Intan Rosiana

    Uploaded by

    Intan Rosiana
    This document summarizes two cases using different decision making methods. The first case uses the Bayes method to rank three motorcycle options based on attributes. It ranks Yamaha Mio first, followed by Suzuki Spin, then Honda Vario. The second case uses the Composite Performance Index method to rank four city options as locations for a warehouse based on distance, rental costs, electricity capacity, and building area. It ranks Purwakarta first, followed by Bandung, then Bogor, with Karawang ranked last.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    2012510158_Intan Rosiana

    [UTS Sistem Penunjang Keputusan]

    Kasus II (Metode Bayes) :

    1. Honda Vario = (4 * 0.4) + (3 * 0.3) + (3 * 0.3) = 3.4


    2. Yamaha Mio = (4 * 0.4) + (5 * 0.3) + (2 * 0.3) = 3.7
    3. Suzuki Spin = (3 * 0.4) + (4 * 0.3) + (4 * 0.3) = 3.6
    Peringkat = 1. Yamaha Mio, 2. Suzuki Spin dan 3. Honda Vario

    Kasus III (Metode Composite Performance Index (CPI) :

    Jarak dengan Gudang (-) :


    Bandung = 30 / 50 * 100 = 60
    Bogor = 50 / 50 * 100 = 100
    Purwakarta = 40 / 50 * 100 = 80
    Karawang = 30 / 50 * 100 = 60
    Biaya Sewa per Tahun ( + ) =
    Bandung = 40 / 25 * 100 = 160
    Bogor = 30 / 25 * 100 = 120
    Purwakarta = 35 / 25 * 100 = 140
    Karawang = 25 / 25 * 100 = 100

    Daya Listrik (+) :


    Bandung = 2200 / 1300 * 100 = 169,2
    Bogor = 1300 / 1300 * 100 = 100
    Purwakarta = 2200 / 1300 * 100 = 169,2
    Karawang = 1300 / 1300 * 100 = 100

    Luas Bangunan ( + ) =
    Bandung = 100 / 75 * 100 = 133,3
    Bogor = 80 / 75 * 100 = 106,6
    Purwakarta = 100 / 75 * 100 = 133,3
    Karawang = 75 / 75 * 100 = 100

    1. Bandung = (60 * 0,35) + (160 * 0,3) + (169,2 * 0,15) + (133,3 * 0,2) = 121,04
    2. Bogor = (100 * 0,35) + (120 * 0,3) + (100 * 0,15) + (106,6 * 0,2) = 107,32
    3. Purwakarta = (80 * 0,35) + (140 * 0,3) + (169,2 * 0,15) + (133,3 * 0,2) = 122,04
    4. Karawang = (60 * 0,35) + (100 * 0,3) + (100 * 0,15) + (100 * 0,2) = 86
    Peringkat = 1. Purwakarta, 2. Bandung, 3. Bogor, 4. Karawang

    You might also like