You are on page 1of 2

THP a world where sport is treated as a hobby rather than a

competitive industry
The world where sport is treated as a competitive industry is a world of misery,
spport is something that we should celebrate not to be a competition of whom is
better especially when we don’t know the real situation whether the athlete is
actually that good or not but the competition represents the athlete’s skill and
apparently making the sport itself is toxic at the end of the day. We say that is
really bad for the sport itself and people who likes sport, therefore as prop we
prefer a world where sport is treated as a hobby, it means that in sport you just
play it as your hobby in your neighbourhood with your friends and you don’t have to
be worried of losing because its only a game. Their side of the house have to
defend a world where sport is a competitive industry it looks like Asian games,
World cup, Thomas Cup and what not, their side of the house can’t also make a
stance that says that sport can still be treated as a hobby right, their side of the
house have to defend a world where even if you only play your soccer with your
neighbor, you still potray it as competitoont that if you lose you’re gonna think
about it until the end of the day because you feel that your life sucks after losing
a comp for example and it makes your reputation bad. Panel, from the comparison
of the stance, I think you already know that we’re the good ones

there are couples of model in this debate :

1. In this debate, opp can’t make any new mechanism, this is a prefer world
debate, it means that we’re going to act as a normal rational human being
that can’t really change anything in the statusquo, it’s just an evaluation of
the statusquo and which statusquo better
2. What does competitive industry means? It means an industry that makes
sport as competitive so its all about competition, it’s about world cup. And
realize that what it means by “industry” here is that they usually make it as
a profit. The committee will make it as a profit so they’ll do anything to gain
profit and the athlete would also usually do anything to win the comp to gain
a lot of moneys and reputation it looks like there are athlete that use dopine
to win for example and I’ll elaborate more about that in my subtantive

With that, I have two points of argument in this debate


1. Why is It principally not ok to make sport as a competitive industry

Panel, in this argument I’ll give you three ideas on the harm of the competitive
industry in sport and why is it justified to not make a sport as a competitive
industry

First of all let’

-the impact to the sport lover (athlete itself)

-potray the competitive industry -> they use money -> so therefore that’d be a lot
of things bad that their side of the house does just to gain profit, and it effects
athlete that literally use dopine for example to wi

If opposition say that in the sq sport competition is getting better and better we
say that that’s not true, the reason is bea`

2. Why in our side it will make sport as something that’s better

-Potray that in ourside it’ll be better because when you treat it as a hobby there’ll
be no toxicity that happen

You might also like