Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT
ARTICLE INFO
Health workers in carrying out their duties as the frontline for handling, preventing and caring for
HOWTO CITED: Covid-19 patients experience anxiety because it is caused by several factors, one of which is
Fadli, F., Safruddin, S ,. Ahmad,
the availability of personal protective equipment. This research was conducted to determine the
AS, Sumbara, S ,. & Baharuddin, factors that most influence the anxiety of health workers in preventing Covid-19. Quantitative
R (2020). Factors Affecting Speed research uses analytical observational methods with a design
Published
June 20, 2020
ABSTRACT
Health workers in carrying out their duties as the frontliners in handling, preventing and caring of
COVID-19 patients experience anxiety caused by several factors and one of them is the availability of
personal protective equipment (PPE). This study is conducted to determine some factors that mostly
influence the anxiety of health workers in preventing Covid-19. Quantitative research is used by
analytical observation methods with cross-sectional design and is conducted in three Hospitals and
nine Health Services in April 2020. Sampling techniques used cluster random sampling (n = 115.
Person chi-square tests are conducted to assess the relationship between anxiety and age, family
status, availability of personal protective equipment,
57
Fadli, F., Safruddin, S ,. Ahmad, AS, Sumbara, S ,. & Baharuddin, R. | Factors Affecting Anxiety ...
and knowledge. Independent variable is evaluated using logistic regression test analysis to determine the most influential variable.
The results of this study indicate that there are influences of age (p-value = 0.024); family status (p-value = 0.022); patient honesty
(p-value = 0.034); the availability of personal protective equipment (p-value = 0.014); knowledge (p-value = 0.030) on staffs' anxiety.
The logistic regression test result clarifies that the availability of personal protective equipment is the most influential on anxiety (r =
0.517; CI = 1.34-8.06), which means the availability of protective devices has a 51.7% influence on the anxiety of health workers in
preventing of Covid-19. Therefore,
health against an infectious disease pandemic is with their family members. Therefore, the aim of this
increasing because it is caused by feelings of anxiety study is to determine the factors that most influence the
about one's own health and the spread of the family anxiety of health workers in efforts to prevent Covid-19 in
(Cheng et al., 2020). Anxiety is a worry that is not clearly Sidrap Regency, South Sulawesi, eastern Indonesia.
felt by someone with a feeling of uncertainty and
helplessness (Stuart, 2016). Panic and fear are part of
the emotional aspect, while the mental or cognitive
aspect is the disruption of attention, worry, irregularity in METHOD
thinking, and feeling confused (Ghufron & Risnawita, This research is quantitative with analytic
2014). So that from the Covid-19 incident, health workers observational and use
felt depressed and worried. draft cross-sectional. Variable that
used in this study, namely anxiety of health workers as the
dependent variable and the independent variable as a causal
factor, namely knowledge, family status, and availability of
Research by Cheng et al. (2020) stated that out of personal protective equipment.
13 participants experienced anxiety because protective
supplies had not been fulfilled when taking action on The population in this study were health workers,
patients. Health workers are a group that is very namely nurses and doctors who were in charge of the
vulnerable to being infected with Covid-19 because they prevention, handling and care of Covid-19 patients in the
are at the forefront of case management, therefore they emergency room installation room, hospital isolation room and
must be equipped with complete PPE according to WHO those on duty at the Sidrap Regency community health center.
protocols so that the anxiety experienced is reduced. Determination
According to the IASC (2020) the cause of health workers technique taking sample
experiencing anxiety is high job demands, including long use cluster random sampling. Of the 437 total population
working hours, the number of patients increases, it is of health workers who were targeted in the study
increasingly difficult to get social support because of the subjects, there were 115 who returned online-based
community stigma against frontline officers, questionnaires that were randomly drawn at each health
self-protection tools that limit movement, lack of service. So that the number of samples in this study were
information about exposure long-term in people who are 115 respondents who were willing to be samples in this
infected, study. The criteria for respondents who were the subjects
in this study were active health workers on duty, in good
health, 21 to 50 years old, at least three diploma
education, and willing to be respondents. All participants
agreed to the study protocol and provided written
consent. This research has been approved by the
The results of Lai et al's (2020) study regarding STIKES Muhamadiyah Sidrap Ethics Committee
health workers at risk of experiencing psychological
disorders in treating Covid-19 patients, the results
showed that 50.4% of respondents had depressive with
symptoms and 44.6% had anxiety symptoms due to Number 043 / KEP / II.3.AU /F/ 2020 and
feelings of depression. The most important thing to pay attention to the principles in the research process.
prevent anxiety problems is to provide complete personal
protective equipment, so that health workers in carrying This study focuses on knowing the anxiety of
out their duties do not even feel worried about health workers as the dependent variable in providing
themselves. services to Covid-19 patients using instruments
research developed by Zung (1997), namely the first part is demographic data, the second part is the
Zung-Self Anxiety Rating Scale ( ZSAS). Before this anxiety questionnaire, the third part is the questionnaire about the
instrument was distributed, first the validity and reliability availability of personal protective equipment, and the last part is the
tests were conducted on health workers who were not knowledge questionnaire for health workers which was conducted for
included in the subject of this study and the Cronbach 3 weeks.
Alpha value was 0.682 with 25 total anxiety questions. valid use Bivariate analysis was performed using
chi-square to determine the relationship between the variable
Likert scale. The minimum threshold score on the anxiety knowledge, availability of personal protective equipment, family
questionnaire was 25 and the limit score was 125 with a status to the variable anxiety health workers. Analysis logistic
criterion score of 25-50 symptoms without anxiety, 51-75 mild regression
symptoms, 75-100 moderate symptoms, and 101-125 multivariate used to see the variables that most influence
symptoms of severe anxiety. The independent variables in this the level of anxiety of health workers in preventing
study were the level of knowledge of health workers in Covid-19. R Square
preventing Covid-19, availability of personal protective calculated to assess the relative risk of the effect of the
equipment, patient honesty, and family status. This research independent variable with a significance value <0.05 was
questionnaire uses online media, namely google form which is considered significant. Data analysis was performed using
divided into 4 parts statistical software SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp).
RESULTS
Table 1.Bivariate analysis of factors causing anxiety among health workers in efforts to prevent Covid-19 (n = 115)
Table 1 shows that most of the level of anxiety gender, on average almost all experience mild anxiety.
experienced by health workers is mild anxiety (65.2%), Based on the results of the research instrument using a
while those who do not experience anxiety (20.0%). questionnaire about anxiety, the availability of personal
Based on the results of the age characteristics, almost all protective equipment, and knowledge, so that the factors
ages experience mild anxiety, namely ≤30 years (39.1%) causing anxiety in health workers can be seen from the lack
and> 30 years (26.1%). While of availability of personal protective equipment.
of the needs, (47.8%) experienced mild anxiety, health workers in efforts to handle, prevent, and care for
moderate anxiety (11.3%), severe anxiety (1.7%), and Covid-19 patients.
only 15.7% experienced no anxiety. Most of the health In the multivariate analysis in table 2 shows the
workers already have wives and children, so this is a test results logistic regression on the level of anxiety as
factor causing them to be mildly anxious (46.1%). More the dependent variable, the variable availability of
than personal protective equipment (p = 0.014), family status
half power health have (0.022), and knowledge (p = 0.030) had a significant
good knowledge about how to prevent, treat, and treat effect on the anxiety of health workers on duty. Based on
Covid-19 problems. But there are still many who the results of the value r square, shows that
experience mild anxiety (53.9%), this is due to factors of
concern for family and the availability of personal variable independent that most
protective equipment. From the test results pearson effect is the availability of personal protective equipment (r =
chisquare, There is an influence between age (p = 0.517), which means that the availability of personal protective
0.030), family status (0.014), patient honesty (p = 0.036), equipment has an effect of 51.7% on the anxiety of health
availability of PPE (0.012), and knowledge (p = 0.025) on workers and 48.3% is influenced
anxiety by factor status family,
knowledge, and other factors.
Table 2. The results of the multivariate logistic regression test on the influence of factors causing anxiety among health workers in the effort
2020). British research states that Covid-19 is 10 times Puspanegara (2019), stated
the number of SARS cases that there is a relationship between late adulthood
on coping mechanisms with anxiety (p = 0.005). most of higher transmission is about 1 meter (about 3 feet) from
the ages 21 to 45 have anxiety disorders. During the an infected person (Repici et al., 2020). The maximum
Covid-19 pandemic, health workers feel depressed and distance to avoid the virus is about 2 meters from the
worried so that anxiety increases in carrying out their patient or sufferer (Razai, Doerholt, Ladhani, &
duties due to the availability of personal protective Oakeshott,
equipment. 2020). So that health workers who carry out examinations
of Covid-19 patients are required to use complete
The results of this study indicate that there is a personal protective equipment, to avoid exposure to the
significant effect of the availability of personal protective Covid-19 virus (WHO, 2020). Personal protective
equipment on the anxiety of health workers in charge of equipment includes gloves, medical masks, goggles or
health services. For this reason, the provision of proper face shields, and protective clothing, as well as special
personal protective equipment is very important (Lockhart, procedures, respirators (e.g. N95 or FFP2 standard or
Duggan, Wax, Saad, & Grocott, 2020). With the lack of equivalent) and aprons (WHO,
availability of complete personal protective equipment
according to WHO protocol, health workers tend to have 2020).
anxiety disorders compared to personal protective The availability of personal protective equipment for
equipment as needed (r = health workers is still lacking, so that many health workers
have been exposed to the virus and some have even died
0.517; 95% CI = 1.34-8.06). So that the factor of the availability of (Ramadhan, 2020). Based on the results of this study, the
personal protective equipment has an influence average respondent answered that the availability of
51.7% of health workers' anxiety in efforts to prevent personal protective equipment at the location where they
Covid-19. provided services to Covid-19 patients was still lacking
Similar research shows that out of 13 participants (76.5%) and respondents who had the availability of
experience anxiety because protective supplies have not personal protective equipment were (23.5%). If there is not
been fulfilled when taking action on patients (Cheng et al. adequate personal protective equipment, it can endanger
first-line healthcare workers (Wu, Chen, & Chan, 2020).
2020). Lack of personal protective equipment facilities
Health workers regarding this contagious disease long working time, increasing number of patients and
pandemic have increased due to feelings of anxiety about changing best practices as information about Covid-19
their own health and the spread to the family. develops (IASC, 2020). Therefore, it is very necessary to
have great support from the government for the provision
Most of the health workers who were respondents of personal protective equipment, training for health
in this study were already married with 83 people (72.1%) workers, as well as additional health benefits for both
while those who were not married were 32 people themselves and their families.
(27.8%). This is one of the factors they experience
anxiety because when treating positive patients with
Covid-19 or conducting examinations for people who CONCLUSION
have symptoms of Covid-19. Health workers are worried The results of this study indicate that there is an
that they will transmit the Covid-19 corona virus to their influence between age, family status, patient honesty,
families (Shanafelt, Ripp, Sinai, & Trockel, 2020). They availability of PPE, and knowledge of health workers'
also feel stigmatized because they feel themselves anxiety in efforts to prevent Covid-19. The results of the
connected with patients who are infected with the virus. logistic regression test showed that the variable
The results of this study indicate that the status of health availability of personal protective equipment and family
workers who have families with anxiety tends to have a status had the most influence on the anxiety of health
greater influence than unmarried health workers (r = 0.38; workers. The psychological response experienced by
95% CI = 0.15-0.81). This virus can move rapidly from health workers to an infectious disease pandemic is
human to human through direct contact (Li et al., 2020; increasing due to feelings of anxiety about their own
Rothe et al., 2020) (Wu et al., 2020). Therefore, health due to a lack of PPE availability and the spread of
knowledge is needed about how to prevent transmission the virus to their families. Therefore, it needs a lot of
of this virus. support from the government to provide health insurance
assistance and facilities for both health workers and their
families.
the status. Military Medical Research, 7 ( 11), 1–10. Puspanegara, A. (2019). Effect of age on
relationship mechanism coping with
Heymann, DL (2020). A novel coronavirus worry. Journal of Health Sciences Bhakti Husada,
outbreak of global health concern. Lancet, 10 ( 2), 142–149. https://doi.org/
395, 470–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 10.34305 / JIKBH.V10I2. 102
6736 (20) 30185-9 Ramadan, A. (2020). The availability of PPE is vital
IASC. (2020). Notes on health aspects to protect health workers. Jakarta. Retrieved from
psychosocial and mental health of the Covid-19 outbreak (pp. 1– https://www.antaranews.com/
20). news / 1411158 / vital-availability-apd-
Ministry of Health., RI. (2020). Case Development to-protect-health-personnel
Cumulative Covid-19 in Indonesia. Retrieved from Razai, MS, Doerholt, K., Ladhani, S., &
http://pusatkrisis.kemkes.go.id/
Oakeshott, P. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019
Lai, J., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Cai, Z., Hu, J., Wei, N.,
(covid-19): a guide for UK. Medical lLadersip and
Li, R. (2020). Factors AssociatedWithMental Health
Management, ( March), 1–5.
Outcomes Among Health Care Workers Exposed to
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m800
Coronavirus Disease
Remuzzi, A., & Remuzzi, G. (2020). Health Policy
2019. JAMA, 3 ( 3), 1–12. https://doi.org/
COVID-19 and Italy: what next? Health Policy, 2, 10–13.
10.1001 / zamanetworkopen.2020.3976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/
Li, Q., Guan, X., Wu, P., Wang, X., Zhou, L., Tong, Y.,
S0140-6736 (20) 30627-9
Feng, Z. (2020). Early Transmission Dynamics in
Repici, A., Maselli, R., Colombo, M., Gabbiadini,
Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus – Infected
R., Spadaccini, M., Anderloni, A., Lagioia, M. (2020a).
Pneumonia. The New England Journal of Medicine,
Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the
382 ( 13), 1199–
department of endoscopy should know. Gastrointestinal
1207. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001316
Lockhart, SL, Duggan, FL V, Wax, FRS, Endoscopy Journal,
Saad, S., & Grocott, HP (2020). Personal protective 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2020.03.019
equipment (PPE) for both anesthesiologists and other Repici, A., Maselli, R., Colombo, M., Gabbiadini,
airway managers: principles and practice during the R., Spadaccini, M., Anderloni, A., Lagioia, M. (2020b).
COVID-19 pandemic. Canadian Journal of Coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak: what the
Anesthesia. department of endoscopy should know. Gastrointestinal
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01673-w Endoscopy, 1–6.
Maben, J., & Bridges, J. (2020). Covid-19: https://doi.org/ 10.1016 / j.gie.2020.03.019
Supporting nurses' psychological and mental health. Journal Rothe, C., Schunk, M., Sothmann, P., Bretzel, G.,
of Clinical Nursing, 29 ( 10), 1423–1424. Froeschl, G., Wallrauch, C., Janke, C. (2020).
https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15307 Transmission of 2019-nCoV Infection from an
PDPI. (2020). Clinical Practice Guide: Pneumonia Asymptomatic Contact in Germany. The New England
2019 n-CoV. Jakarta: PDPI. Journal of Medicine, 382 ( 10).
Pemprov., South Sulawesi. (2020). South Sulawesi's Covid-Response https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2001468
19. 1 S. Pemprov, (2020). Retrieved from https: // Shanafelt, T., Ripp, J., Sinai, M., & Trockel, M.
covid19.sulselprov.go.id/data (2020). Understanding and Addressing Sources of
Phelan, LA, Katz, R., & Gostin, LO (2020). Anxiety Among Health Care Professionals
The Novel Coronavirus Originating in Wuhan During the COVID-19
, China Challenges for Global Health Governance. JAMA, Pandemic. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/
323 ( 8), 709–710. https: // doi.org/10.1001/jama.
2020.1097 jama. 2020.5893
Shereen, MA, Khan, S., Kazmi, A., Bashir, N., &
Prompetchara, E., Ketloy, C., & Palaga, T. (2020). Siddique, R. (2020). COVID-19 infection: Origin,
Immune responses in COVID-19 and potential transmission, and characteristics of human
vaccines: Lessons learned from SARS and MERS
coronaviruses. Journal of Advanced Research, 24, 91–98.
epidemic. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and
https://doi.org/10.1016/
Immunology, 38, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.12932/
j.jare.2020.03.005
AP-200220-0772
Stuart, GW (2016). Principles and Practices Yuliana. (2020). Corona Virus Diseases (COVIR-
Mental Health Nursing. Singapore: Elsevier. 19): A literature review. Wellness And Healthy
Magazine, 2 ( February), 187–192. Retrieved from
WHO. (2020a). Coronavirus disease 2019 https: //wellness.journalpress.
(COVID-19) Situation Report –67. id / wellness / article / view / 21026
WHO. (2020b). The World Health Organization Zhu, N., Zhang, D., Wang, W., Le, X., Yang, B.,
declared the coronavirus outbreak a Global Public Song, J., & Zhoa, X. (2020). A Novel Coronavirus
Health Emergency. Retrieved from from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. Journal
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ of Medicine, 382 ( 8), 727–733.
Wu, Y., Chen, C., & Chan, Y. (2020). The outbreak https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa
of COVID-19: An overview. Journal of the Chinese 2001017
Medical Association, (83) 3), Zung, WWK (1997). Rating anxiety for anxiety
217–220. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA. physychosomatic disorder. USA: Mosby Company.
0000000000000270