Professional Documents
Culture Documents
speaking
BY DONALD L. SNYDER, ATOTECH USA, INC.,
ROCK HILL, S.C.
Mixed-catalyst baths are used when their special prop- 2H+ + 2(e)jH2(gas) + a mist(H2SO4 +Cr+6+H2O) (4)
erties are required, but they are more expensive and slight-
ly more difficult to operate than conventional processes. This side reaction consumes most of the available
They typically plate at faster speeds, have better coverage, power not used by reaction (3). The mist, a major HSE
have wider bright ranges, and are more tolerant to impu- concern, can be trapped within the plating tank by the
rities. They are also less sensitive to current interruptions use of mist control agents or surface tension reducers.
and can be plated over more passive surfaces. Trivalent chromium ions are created and oxidized by:
The basic formulations of hexavalent chromium
processes are very similar. They consist of chromic triox- Cr2O7-2 +14H+ +6(e) 2Cr+3+7H2O (5)
ide (CrO3), which when combined with water forms 2Cr+3+3O2 -6(e) 2CrO3 (6)
chromic acid (H2CrO4), and the sulfate ion (SO4+2)
which is added in the form of sulfuric acid or a sulfate
salt. Even though chemically incorrect, solid chromic Reaction (6) is catalyzed by a PbO2 film that naturally
oxide is commonly referred to as chromic acid, its hydrat- forms on the lead anode.
ed form. Dilute conventional formulations consist of approxi-
A number of sometimes conflicting theories have been mately 250 g/L (33 oz/gal) chromic trioxide (“chromic
proposed to explain the very complex mechanism of hexa- acid”), and 2.5 g/L (0.33 oz/gal) sulfate. Concentrated
valent chromium electroplating. In a simplified form, conventional baths contain approximately 400 g/L (53
they all contain the following multiple reactions: oz/gal) chromic trioxide and 4.0 g/L (0.53 oz/gal) sulfate.
In practice, however, concentrations in between these are
Cr3+H2OjH2CrO4 CrO4j-2+2H+ (1) widely used.
-2 The dilute formulation offers good coverage, moderate
2H2CrO4jH2Cr2O7 +H2OjCr2O7j +2H++H2O (2)
nickel substrate activation, and consistent current effi-
Deposition reaction: ciency. It also has a lower solution cost, plates faster, and
produces less waste to treat. The concentrated formula-
Cr2O7-2+14H++12(e)+CAT 2Cr0 +7H2O (3) tion gives better coverage and greater resistance to impu-
rities and requires lower operating voltages; however, it is
CAT is the required catalyst, e.g., sulfate in addition to more expensive to make up because of its higher chromi-
fluoride and/or an organic catalyst, while (e) refers to an um concentration and more chromium is dragged out
electron. The plating efficiency of reaction (3) is approxi- resulting in higher waste treatment coat.
mately 20% or less depending upon the catalyst, bath A critical point in all bath formulations is the require-
chemistry and the current density. ment for close control of the CrO3/SO4 weight ratio
Rectifier voltage Up to 12 Up to 12 4 - 12
process uses graphite anodes immersed directly into the plating” when controlling a trivalent chromium process.
plating solution. An interaction between the anodes and The troubleshooting guides for trivalent chromium
the chemistry of the process eliminated the formation of processes are a few lines long as compared to several pages
hexavalent chromium. A secondary chemical mechanism for hexavalent chromium.
converts hexavalent to trivalent if any does appear in the The additives are added based upon amp-hours, specif-
solution. The anodes, which are destroyed only by ic gravity, and pH. In addition, chemical analysis on a
mechanical means, are placed below solution level to monthly basis appears to be sufficient for control. All
eliminate misting. Since this process utilizes both sulfate trivalent chromium processes are far more sensitive to
and chloride (and boric acid), as in nickel baths, it is now metallic contamination than hexavalent processes.
commonly referred to as a mixed salt trivalent process. Metallic impurities darken the deposit and alter the
Just as with nickel electrolytes, the mixed chloride-sulfate throwing and covering powers. However, most trivalent
formulation enhances the operation of the process. This processes utilize a regenerateable resin to remove all com-
is most noticeable in plating rate and deposit thickness mon metallic contaminates directly from the working
(Table I). The chloride helps to make it easier for the solution. Less desirable, but a quick chemical purification
mixed process to meet the automotive company’s specifi- method or a slow dummying method can also be utilized.
cation for 0.25 to 0.5 microns of chromium. Other fac- These methods eliminate the problems attributed to
tors are listed in Table II. metallic contamination.
The double-cell process originally reduced the side reac- Today, most industries using decorative chromium
tion (8) by isolating the chromium containing solution deposits, such as the automotive/truck industry, approve
from the anode through a membrane box. Because of the use of trivalent chromium for both interior and exte-
maintenance problems and the amount of space that the rior parts. The almost complete elimination of the color
anode boxes took from the plating area inside the tank, difference between hexavalent and trivalent chromium
they have been almost completely replaced by insoluble deposits and the demonstrated corrosion resistance is
metallic catalytic composite anodes with a projected life greatly responsible for this wide acceptance. Some triva-
of 3 to 5 years. With the elimination of the need for an lent chromium deposits have also been found to be much
isolated anode, today this process is commonly referred more resistant to calcium chloride corrosion (Russian
to as a sulfate process. The electrolyte contains no chlo- Mud) than hexavalent chromium deposits.
ride ions.
Once through the learning curve, control of trivalent OPERATIONS
chromium plating processes is typically easier than for The typical operating conditions for trivalent compared
hexavalent chromium processes. The literature says that to hexavalent chromium electroplating processes are
an operator should “think nickel plating not chromium shown in Table I.
Chromium contamination Hexavalent chromium Occasional treatment for Treatment for trivalent
destroyed hexavalent chromium chromium
Table II. Trivalent and Hexavalent Chromium Comparison
SOLUTION MAINTENANCE
The best waste treatment method is
to minimize the amount of solution
dragged out of the plating tank.
Secondly, return as much dragged-
visit us on line
www.metalfinishing.com
www.metalfinishing.com March 2012 I metalfinishing I 21