9.00m Wedge Analysis

Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.
0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0
ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

Present Date/Time: Thu Aug 05 11:07:07 2021 C:\.....in\Desktop\GISPL\PATH 27-02-2012\Harda\Data Received PATH HARDA\Designs HARDA\1 ReSSA1.MSE
DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

Report created by ReSSA(3.0): Update #4.21: Copyright (c) 2001-2016, ADAMA Engineering, Inc.
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
Title: DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

Project Number: GIS/RSW/051 -
Client: HARDA PATHWAYS PVT. LTD.,MHOW
Designer: Aanand Jain
Description:
FOUR LANING OF HARDA TO TEMAGAON FROM KM 0.000 TO KM 30.000
(HARDA-BETUL PKG-I) ON HYBRID ANNUITY MODE UNDER BHARATMALA PARIYOJNA
PHASE-I IN THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH.
Company's information:
Name: M/s GREEN INFRASTRUCTURES SYSTEMS PVT.LTD.

Street: G-151, DREAMS THE MALL, BHANDUP WEST
L.B.S. ROAD
MUMBAI, MAHARASHTRA 400078
Telephone #: +91-9004766009
Fax #:
E-Mail: gispl@protonmail.com
Original file path and name: C:\Users\A ..... ata Received PATH HARDA\Designs HARDA\1 ReSSA1.MSE
Original date and time of creating this file: Wed Aug 04 22:36:37 2021
PROGRAM MODE: Analysis of a Simplified Slope using GEOSYNTHETIC as reinforcing material.
Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0
DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 1 of 8

Copyright © 2001-2016 ADAMA Engineering, Inc. www.GeoPrograms.com License number ReSSA-301478

INPUT DATA (EXCLUDING REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT)
SOIL DATA
Internal angle of
Unit weight,  friction,  Cohesion, c
=========== Soil Layer #: =========== [kN/m ³] [deg.] [kPa]
REINFORCED SOIL................................. 20.0 30.0 0.0
RETAINED SOIL...................................... 20.0 30.0 0.0
FOUNDATION SOIL................................ 18.0 26.0 0.0
REINFORCEMENT
Reinforcement Ultimate Reduction Reduction Reduction Additional Coverage

Strength, Factor for Factor for Factor for Reduction Ratio,
Type # Geosynthetic Tult Installation Durability, Creep, Factor, Rc
Designated Name [kN/m] Damage, RFid RFd RFc RFa
2 SGG 100 100.00 1.20 1.10 1.56 1.00 1.00

3 SGG 80 80.00 1.20 1.10 1.56 1.00 1.00
4 SGG 60 60.00 1.20 1.10 1.56 1.00 1.00
5 SGG 40 40.00 1.20 1.10 1.56 1.00 1.00
Interaction Parameters == Direct Sliding == ==== Pullout ====
Type # Geosynthetic Cds-phi Cds-c Ci Alpha

Designated Name
2 SGG 100 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80

3 SGG 80 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80
4 SGG 60 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80
5 SGG 40 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80
Relative Orientation of Reinforcement Force, ROR = 0.00. Assigned Factor of Safety to resist pullout, Fs-po = 1.50
Design method for Global Stability: Comprehensive Bishop.
WATER
Water is not present
SEISMICITY
Horizontal peak ground acceleration coefficient, Ao = 0.135
Design horizontal seismic coefficient, kh = Am = 0.50 x Ao = 0.068 & design vertical seismic coefficient, kv (down) = 0.000 x kh = 0.000


DRAWING OF SPECIFIED GEOMETRY - SIMPLE
GEOMETRY
.......................................................................
Height of slope, H 9.00 [m]
Slope angle, i
....................................................................... 90.00 [deg.]
Horizontal crest length, A
....................................................................... 0.00 [m]
Horizontal crest length, B
....................................................................... 0.00 [m]
Backslope angle, 
....................................................................... 0.00 [deg.]
Sloping angle, 
....................................................................... 0.00 [deg.]
UNIFORM SURCHARGE
.......................................................................
Surcharge load over A, Q1 0.00 [kPa]
Surcharge load over backslope B, Q2
....................................................................... 0.00 [kPa]
Surcharge load away from backslope, Q3
....................................................................... 24.00 [kPa]
SCALE:
0 2 4 6 [m]


DISTRIBUTION OF AVAILABLE STRENGTH ALONG EACH REINFORCEMENT LAYER
A = Front-end of reinforcement (at face of slope)

B = Rear-end of reinforcement
AB = L1 + L2 + L3 = Embedded length of reinforcement
Tavailable = Long-term strength of reinforcement

Tfe = Available front-end strength (e.g., connection to facing)
L1 = Front-end 'pullout' length

L2 = Rear-end pullout length
Tavailable prevails along L3
Factor of safety on resistance to pullout on either end of reinforcement, Fs-po = 1.50
Reinforcement Designated Height Relative L L1 L2 L3 Tfe Tavailable

Layer # Name to Toe [m] [m] [m] [m] [m] [kN/m] [kN/m]
1 SGG 100 0.20 7.60 0.00 0.57 7.03 48.56 48.56

2 SGG 80 0.60 7.60 0.00 0.47 7.13 38.85 38.85
3 SGG 80 1.00 7.60 0.00 0.50 7.10 38.85 38.85
4 SGG 80 1.40 7.60 0.00 0.52 7.08 38.85 38.85
5 SGG 80 1.80 7.60 0.00 0.55 7.05 38.85 38.85
6 SGG 80 2.20 6.50 0.00 0.58 5.92 38.85 38.85
7 SGG 80 2.60 6.50 0.00 0.62 5.88 38.85 38.85
8 SGG 60 3.00 6.50 0.00 0.50 6.00 29.14 29.14
9 SGG 60 3.40 6.50 0.00 0.53 5.97 29.14 29.14
10 SGG 60 3.80 6.50 0.00 0.57 5.93 29.14 29.14
11 SGG 60 4.20 6.50 0.00 0.62 5.88 29.14 29.14
12 SGG 60 4.60 6.50 0.00 0.68 5.82 29.14 29.14
13 SGG 60 5.00 6.50 0.00 0.74 5.76 29.14 29.14
14 SGG 40 5.40 6.50 0.00 0.55 5.95 19.43 19.43
15 SGG 40 5.80 6.50 0.00 0.62 5.88 19.43 19.43
16 SGG 40 6.20 6.50 0.00 0.71 5.79 19.43 19.43
17 SGG 40 6.60 6.50 0.00 0.83 5.67 19.43 19.43
18 SGG 40 7.00 6.50 0.00 0.99 5.51 19.43 19.43
19 SGG 40 7.40 6.50 0.00 1.24 5.26 19.43 19.43
20 SGG 40 7.80 6.50 0.00 1.65 4.85 19.43 19.43
21 SGG 40 8.20 6.50 0.00 2.47 4.03 19.43 19.43
22 SGG 40 8.60 6.50 0.00 4.93 1.57 19.43 19.43


RESULTS OF ROTATIONAL STABILITY ANALYSIS
Results in the tables below represent critical circles identified between specified points on entry and exit. (Theta-exit set to 50.00 deg.)
The most critical circle is obtained from a search considering all the combinations of input entry and exit points.
Critical circles for each entry point (considering all specified exit points)
Entry Entry Point Exit Point Critical Circle
Point # (X,Y) (X,Y) ( Xc , Yc , R ) Fs STATUS
[m] [m] [m]
1 0.10 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -722.07 12.60 722.18 63.40

2 0.99 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -44.45 9.45 45.45 5.54
3 1.88 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -21.79 9.25 23.68 3.12
4 2.77 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -13.44 9.06 16.21 2.40
5 3.66 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -9.38 9.06 13.04 2.17
6 4.55 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -12.28 11.86 17.07 2.10
7 5.44 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -23.20 20.17 30.75 1.98
8 6.33 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -40.54 35.24 53.71 1.83
9 7.22 9.00 -9.18 0.11 -3.49 9.18 10.71 1.58
10 8.11 9.00 -9.15 0.10 -2.86 9.10 10.97 1.37
.11 9.00 9.00 -9.04 0.03 -2.44 9.37 11.44 1.27 . On extreme X-entry
Note: In the 'Status' column, OK means the critical circle was identified within the specified search domain. 'On extreme X-entry' means
that the critical result is on the edge of the search domain; a lower Fs may result if the search domain is expanded.
*************************
Results in the tables below represent critical circles identified between specified points on entry and exit. (Theta-exit set to 50.00 deg.)
The most critical circle is obtained from a search considering all the combinations of input entry and exit points.
Critical circles for each exit point (considering all specified entry points).
Exit Exit Point Entry Point Critical Circle
Point # (X,Y) (X,Y) ( Xc , Yc , R ) Fs STATUS
[m] [m] [m]
.1 -9.04 0.03 9.00 9.00 -2.44 9.37 11.44 1.27 . On extreme X-exit
2 -8.21 0.08 9.00 9.00 -2.07 9.29 11.07 1.28
3 -7.38 0.11 9.00 9.00 -1.69 9.17 10.69 1.30
4 -6.34 0.02 9.00 9.00 -1.30 9.01 10.30 1.34
5 -5.58 0.08 9.00 9.00 -1.12 9.17 10.12 1.39
6 -4.66 0.06 9.00 9.00 -0.82 9.11 9.82 1.46
7 -3.67 0.02 9.00 9.00 -0.63 9.16 9.63 1.56
8 -2.83 0.03 9.00 9.00 -0.42 9.14 9.42 1.67
9 -1.80 0.00 9.00 9.00 -0.20 9.06 9.20 1.78
10 -1.00 0.01 9.00 9.00 -0.41 9.40 9.42 1.87
11 -0.00 -0.00 9.00 9.00 -59.85 68.85 91.23 1.47
Note: In the 'Status' column, OK means the critical circle was identified within the specified search domain. 'On extreme X-exit' means
that the critical result is on the edge of the search domain; a lower Fs may result if the search domain is expanded.


RESULTS OF TRANSLATIONAL ANALYSIS
Results in the table below represent critical two-part wedges identified between
specified starting (X1) and ending (X2) search points. Wedges along all
reinforcement layers and at elevation zero are reported. The critical two-part
wedge, one for each predetermined elevation, is defined by Xa, Xb and Xc where
Xa is the front end of the passive wedge (slope face), Xb is where the passive
wedge ends and the active one starts, and Xc is the X-ordinate at which the active
wedge starts.
Critical two-part wedge along each interface:
Interface Height Relative to Toe ( Xa, Ya ) ( Xb, Yb ) ( Xc, Yc ) Fs STATUS

[m] [m] [m] [m]
. At toe elevation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 11.72 9.00 1.22 . Minimum on Edge
......................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Reinf. Layer #1 0.20 0.00 0.20 0.20 0.20 11.88 9.00 1.25 Minimum on Edge
Note: In the 'Status' column, OK means the critical two part-wedge was identified within the specified search domain. 'Minimum on Edge'
means the critical result corresponds to a minimum on the edge of the search domain; i.e., either on X1 or X2 or the internally preset
limits on Xc.


CRITICAL RESULTS OF ROTATIONAL AND TRANSLATIONAL STABILITY ANALYSES

Rotational (Circular Arc; Bishop) Stability Analysis
Minimum Factor of Safety = 1.27
Critical Circle: Xc = -2.44[m], Yc = 9.37[m], R = 11.44[m]. (Number of slices used = 58 )
Translational (2-Part Wedge; Spencer), Direct Sliding, Stability Analysis

Minimum Factor of Safety = 1.22
Critical Two-Part Wedge: (Xa = 0.00, Ya = 0.00) [m]
(Xb = 0.20, Yb = 0.00) [m]
(Xc = 11.72, Yc = 9.00) [m]
(Number of slices used = 30 )
Interslice resultant force inclination = 34.72 [degrees]
Three-Part Wedge Stability Analysis
NOT CONDUCTED
REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: DRAWING
SCALE:
0 2 4 6[m]


REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: TABULATED DATA & QUANTITIES
Height Embedded Covergae

Layer Reinf. Geosynthetic Relative Length Ratio, ( X, Y ) front ( X, Y ) rear Lsv * Lre
# Type # Designated Name to Toe [m] [m] Rc [m] [m] [m] [m]
1 2 SGG 100 0.20 7.60 1.00 0.00 0.20 7.60 0.20 0.00 0.00
2 3 SGG 80 0.60 7.60 1.00 0.00 0.60 7.60 0.60 0.00 0.00
3 3 SGG 80 1.00 7.60 1.00 0.00 1.00 7.60 1.00 0.00 0.00
4 3 SGG 80 1.40 7.60 1.00 0.00 1.40 7.60 1.40 0.00 0.00
5 3 SGG 80 1.80 7.60 1.00 0.00 1.80 7.60 1.80 0.00 0.00
6 3 SGG 80 2.20 6.50 1.00 0.00 2.20 6.50 2.20 0.00 0.00
7 3 SGG 80 2.60 6.50 1.00 0.00 2.60 6.50 2.60 0.00 0.00
8 4 SGG 60 3.00 6.50 1.00 0.00 3.00 6.50 3.00 0.00 0.00
9 4 SGG 60 3.40 6.50 1.00 0.00 3.40 6.50 3.40 0.00 0.00
10 4 SGG 60 3.80 6.50 1.00 0.00 3.80 6.50 3.80 0.00 0.00
11 4 SGG 60 4.20 6.50 1.00 0.00 4.20 6.50 4.20 0.00 0.00
12 4 SGG 60 4.60 6.50 1.00 0.00 4.60 6.50 4.60 0.00 0.00
13 4 SGG 60 5.00 6.50 1.00 0.00 5.00 6.50 5.00 0.00 0.00
14 5 SGG 40 5.40 6.50 1.00 0.00 5.40 6.50 5.40 0.00 0.00
15 5 SGG 40 5.80 6.50 1.00 0.00 5.80 6.50 5.80 0.00 0.00
16 5 SGG 40 6.20 6.50 1.00 0.00 6.20 6.50 6.20 0.00 0.00
17 5 SGG 40 6.60 6.50 1.00 0.00 6.60 6.50 6.60 0.00 0.00
18 5 SGG 40 7.00 6.50 1.00 0.00 7.00 6.50 7.00 0.00 0.00
19 5 SGG 40 7.40 6.50 1.00 0.00 7.40 6.50 7.40 0.00 0.00
20 5 SGG 40 7.80 6.50 1.00 0.00 7.80 6.50 7.80 0.00 0.00
21 5 SGG 40 8.20 6.50 1.00 0.00 8.20 6.50 8.20 0.00 0.00
22 5 SGG 40 8.60 6.50 1.00 0.00 8.60 6.50 8.60 0.00 0.00
* Vertical distance between layers.

QUANTITIES
Reinf. Type # Designated Name Coverage Ratio Area of reinforcemnt [m²] / length of slope [m]
2 SGG 100 1.00 7.60
3 SGG 80 1.00 43.40
4 SGG 60 1.00 39.00
5 SGG 40 1.00 58.50


9.00m Wedge Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

9.00m Wedge Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.0 ReSSA Version 3.

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

Title: DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

Name: M/s GREEN INFRASTRUCTURES SYSTEMS PVT.LTD.

PROGRAM MODE: Analysis of a Simplified Slope using GEOSYNTHETIC as reinforcing material.

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 1 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

INPUT DATA (EXCLUDING REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT)

RETAINED SOIL...................................... 20.0 30.0 0.0

FOUNDATION SOIL................................ 18.0 26.0 0.0

Reinforcement Ultimate Reduction Reduction Reduction Additional Coverage

2 SGG 100 100.00 1.20 1.10 1.56 1.00 1.00

Interaction Parameters == Direct Sliding == ==== Pullout ====

Type # Geosynthetic Cds-phi Cds-c Ci Alpha

2 SGG 100 0.80 0.00 0.80 0.80

Water is not present

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 2 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

DRAWING OF SPECIFIED GEOMETRY - SIMPLE

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 3 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

DISTRIBUTION OF AVAILABLE STRENGTH ALONG EACH REINFORCEMENT LAYER

A = Front-end of reinforcement (at face of slope)

Tavailable = Long-term strength of reinforcement

L1 = Front-end 'pullout' length

Factor of safety on resistance to pullout on either end of reinforcement, Fs-po = 1.50

Reinforcement Designated Height Relative L L1 L2 L3 Tfe Tavailable

1 SGG 100 0.20 7.60 0.00 0.57 7.03 48.56 48.56

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 4 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

RESULTS OF ROTATIONAL STABILITY ANALYSIS

1 0.10 9.00 -0.00 -0.00 -722.07 12.60 722.18 63.40

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 5 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

RESULTS OF TRANSLATIONAL ANALYSIS

Critical two-part wedge along each interface:

Interface Height Relative to Toe ( Xa, Ya ) ( Xb, Yb ) ( Xc, Yc ) Fs STATUS

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 6 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

CRITICAL RESULTS OF ROTATIONAL AND TRANSLATIONAL STABILITY ANALYSES

Translational (2-Part Wedge; Spencer), Direct Sliding, Stability Analysis

Three-Part Wedge Stability Analysis

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 7 of 8

ReSSA -- Reinforced Slope Stability Analysis DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE

REINFORCEMENT LAYOUT: TABULATED DATA & QUANTITIES

Height Embedded Covergae

* Vertical distance between layers.

DESIGN WITH HORIZONTAL SURCHARGE Page 8 of 8

You might also like