Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 401.11 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
sewage, garbage, sewage sludge, muni- (l) The term navigable waters in-
tions, chemical wastes, biological ma- cludes: All navigable waters of the
terials, radioactive materials, heat, United States; tributaries of navigable
wrecked or discarded equipment, rock, waters of the United States; interstate
sand, cellar dirt and industrial, munic- waters; intrastate lakes, rivers, and
ipal and agricultural waste discharged streams which are utilized by inter-
into water. It does not mean (1) sewage state travelers for recreational or
from vessels or (2) water, gas or other other purposes; intrastate lakes, rivers,
material which is injected into a well and streams from which fish or shell-
to facilitate production of oil or gas, or fish are taken and sold in interstate
water derived in association with oil or commerce; and intrastate lakes, rivers,
gas production and disposed of in a and streams which are utilized for in-
well, if the well, used either to facili- dustrial purposes by industries in
tate production or for disposal pur- interstate commerce. Navigable waters
poses, is approved by authority of the do not include prior converted crop-
State in which the well is located, and land. Notwithstanding the determina-
if such State determines that such in- tion of an area’s status as prior con-
jection or disposal will not result in verted cropland by any other federal
degradation of ground or surface water agency, for the purposes of the Clean
resources. Water Act, the final authority regard-
(g) The term pollution means the ing Clean Water Act jurisdiction re-
man-made or man induced alteration mains with EPA.
of the chemical, physical, biological (m) The terms state water pollution
and radiological integrity of water. control agency, interstate agency, State,
(h) The term discharge of pollutant(s) municipality, person, territorial seas, con-
means: (1) The addition of any pollut- tiguous zone, biological monitoring,
ant to navigable waters from any point schedule of compliance, and industrial
source and (2) any addition of any pol- user shall be defined in accordance with
lutant to the waters of the contiguous section 502 of the Act unless the con-
zone or the ocean from any point text otherwise requires.
source, other than from a vessel or (n) The term noncontract cooling water
other floating craft. The term ‘‘dis- means water used for cooling which
charge’’ includes either the discharge does not come into direct contact with
of a single pollutant or the discharge of any raw material, intermediate prod-
multiple pollutants. uct, waste product or finished product.
(i) The term effluent limitation means (o) The term noncontact cooling water
any restriction established by the Ad- pollutants means pollutants present in
ministrator on quantities, rates, and noncontact cooling waters.
concentrations of chemical, physical, (p) The term blowdown means the
biological and other constituents minimum discharge of recirculating
which are discharged from point water for the purpose of discharging
sources, other than new sources, into materials contained in the water, the
navigable waters, the waters of the further buildup of which would cause
contiguous zone or the ocean. concentration in amounts exceeding
(j) The term effluent limitations guide- limits established by best engineering
lines means any effluent limitations practice.
guidelines issued by the Administrator (q) The term process waste water
pursuant to section 304(b) of the Act. means any water which, during manu-
(k) The term standard of performance facturing or processing, comes into di-
means any restriction established by rect contact with or results from the
the Administrator pursuant to section production or use of any raw material,
306 of the Act on quantities, rates, and intermediate product, finished product,
concentrations of chemical, physical, by-product, or waste product.
biological, and other constituents (r) The term process waste water pol-
which are or may be discharged from lutants means pollutants present in
new sources into navigable waters, the process waste water.
waters of the contiguous zone or the (s) The following abbreviations shall
ocean. have the following meanings:
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 401.12
(1) BOD5 means five-day biochemical treatment works, which require the ap-
oxygen demand; plication of the best available tech-
(2) COD means chemical oxygen de- nology economically achievable which
mand; will result in reasonable further
(3) TOC means total organic carbon; progress toward the national goal of
(4) TDS means total dissolved solids; eliminating the discharge of all pollut-
(5) TSS means total suspended non- ants, as determined in accordance with
filterable solids; regulations issued by the Adminis-
(6) kw means kilowatt(s); trator pursuant to section 304(b)(2) of
(7) kwh means kilowatt hour(s); the Act.
(8) Mw means megawatt(s); (c) Section 304(b) of the Act requires
(9) Mwh means megawatt hour(s); the Administrator to publish regula-
(10) hp means horsepower; tions providing guidelines for effluent
(11) mm means millimeter(s); limitations setting forth the degree of
(12) cm means centimeter; effluent reduction attainable through
(13) m means meter(s); the application of the best practicable
(14) in. means inch; control technology currently available
(15) ft means foot (feet); and the degree of effluent reduction at-
(16) l means liter(s); tainable through the application of the
(17) cu m means cubic meter(s); best control measures and practices
(18) k cu m means 1000 cubic meter(s); achievable including treatment tech-
(19) gal means gallon(s); niques, process and procedure innova-
(20) cu ft means cubic foot (feet);
tions, operating methods and other al-
(21) mg means milligram(s);
ternatives.
(22) g means gram(s);
(d) Section 304(c) of the Act requires
(23) kg means kilogram(s);
the Administrator, after consultation
(24) kkg means 1000 kilogram(s);
(25) lb means pound(s); with appropriate Federal and State
(26) sq m means square meter(s); agencies and other interested persons
(27) ha means hectare(s); to issue information on the process,
(28) sq ft means square foot (feet); and procedures, or operating methods
(29) ac means acre(s). which result in the elimination or re-
duction of the discharge of pollutants
[39 FR 4532, Feb. 1, 1974, as amended at 58 FR to implement standards of performance
45038, Aug. 25, 1994] under section 306 of the Act.
§ 401.12 Law authorizing establish- (e) Section 306(b)(1)(B) of the Act re-
ment of effluent limitations guide- quires the Administrator, after a cat-
lines for existing sources, standards egory of sources is included in a list
of performance for new sources and published pursuant to section
pretreatment standards of new and 306(b)(1)(A) of the Act, to propose regu-
existing sources. lations establishing Federal standards
(a) Section 301(a) of the Act provides of performances for new sources within
that ‘‘except as in compliance with this such category. Standards of perform-
section and sections 302, 306, 307, 318, ance are to provide for the control of
402 and 404 of this Act, the discharge of the discharge of pollutants which re-
any pollutant by any person shall be flect the greatest degree of effluent re-
unlawful.’’ duction which the Administrator deter-
(b) Section 301(b) of the Act requires mines to be achievable through appli-
the achievement by not later than July cation of the best available dem-
1, 1977, of effluent limitations for point onstrated control technology, proc-
sources, other than publicly owned esses, operating methods, or other al-
treatment works, which require the ap- ternatives, including, where prac-
plication of the best practicable con- ticable, a standard permitting no dis-
trol technology currently available as charge of pollutants.
determined by the Administrator pur- (f) Section 307(b) provides that the
suant to section 304(b)(1) of the Act. Administrator shall establish
Section 301(b) also requires the pretreatment standards which shall
achievement by not later than July 1, prevent the discharge of any pollutant
1983, of effluent limitations for point into publicly owned treatment works
sources, other than publicly owned which pollutant interferes with, passes
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 401.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 403
bis(dichloroisopropyl) ether, bis- mittee shall maintain the pH of such
(chloroethoxy) methane and poly- wastewater within the range set forth
chlorinated diphenyl ethers) in the applicable effluent limitations
38. Halomethanes (other than those listed
elsewhere; includes methylene chloride,
guidelines, except excursions from the
methylchloride, methylbromide, range are permitted subject to the fol-
bromoform, dichlorobromomethane lowing limitations:
39. Heptachlor and metabolites (1) The total time during which the
40. Hexachlorobutadiene pH values are outside the required
41. Hexachlorocyclohexane range of pH values shall not exceed 7
42. Hexachlorocyclopentadiene hours and 26 minutes in any calendar
43. Isophorone month; and
44. Lead and compounds
45. Mercury and compounds
(2) No individual excursion from the
46. Naphthalene range of pH values shall exceed 60 min-
47. Nickel and compounds utes.
48. Nitrobenzene (b) The Director, as defined in § 122.3
49. Nitrophenols (including 2,4-dinitrophenol, of this chapter, may adjust the require-
dinitrocresol) ments set forth in paragraph (a) of this
50. Nitrosamines section with respect to the length of
51. Pentachlorophenol individual excursions from the range of
52. Phenol
53. Phthalate esters
pH values, if a different period of time
54. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) 1 is appropriate based upon the treat-
55. Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (in- ment system, plant configuration or
cluding benzanthracenes, benzopyrenes, other technical factors.
benzofluoranthene, chrysenes, dibenz- (c) For purposes of this section, an
anthracenes, and indenopyrenes) excursion is an unintentional and tem-
56. Selenium and compounds porary incident in which the pH value
57. Silver and compounds of discharge wastewater exceeds the
58. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
(TCDD)
range set forth in the applicable efflu-
59. Tetrachloroethylene ent limitations guidelines.
60. Thallium and compounds (Secs. 301, 304, 306 and 501 of the Clean Water
61. Toluene Act (the Federal Water Pollution Control
62. Toxaphene 1 Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et.
63. Trichloroethylene seq., as amended by the Clean Water Act of
64. Vinyl chloride 1977, Pub. L. 95–217))
65. Zinc and compounds
[47 FR 24537, June 4, 1982]
[44 FR 44502, July 30, 1979, as amended at 46
FR 2266, Jan. 8, 1981; 46 FR 10724, Feb. 4, 1981]
PART 402 [RESERVED]
§ 401.16 Conventional pollutants.
The following comprise the list of PART 403—GENERAL PRETREAT-
conventional pollutants designated MENT REGULATIONS FOR EXIST-
pursuant to section 304(a)(4) of the Act: ING AND NEW SOURCES OF
1. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD)
POLLUTION
2. Total suspended solids (nonfilterable)
(TSS) Sec.
3. pH 403.1 Purpose and applicability.
4. Fecal coliform 403.2 Objectives of general pretreatment
5. Oil and grease regulations.
403.3 Definitions.
[44 FR 44503, July 30, 1979; 44 FR 52685, Sept. 403.4 State or local law.
10, 1979] 403.5 National pretreatment standards: Pro-
hibited discharges.
§ 401.17 pH Effluent limitations under 403.6 National pretreatment standards: Cat-
continuous monitoring. egorical standards.
(a) Where a permittee continuously 403.7 Removal credits.
403.8 Pretreatment Program Requirements:
measures the pH of wastewater pursu-
Development and Implementation by
ant to a requirement or option in a Na- POTW.
tional Pollutant Discharge Elimination 403.9 POTW pretreatment programs and/or
System (NPDES) permit issued pursu- authorization to revise pretreatment
ant to section 402 of the Act, the per- standards: Submission for approval.
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:56 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.1 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
403.10 Development and submission of (2) To POTWs which receive waste-
NPDES State pretreatment programs. water from sources subject to National
403.11 Approval procedures for POTW Pretreatment Standards;
pretreatment programs and POTW grant- (3) To States which have or are ap-
ing of removal credits.
plying for National Pollutant Dis-
403.12 Reporting requirements for POTW’s
and industrial users. charge Elimination System (NPDES)
403.13 Variances from categorical programs approved in accordance with
pretreatment standards for fundamen- section 402 of the Act; and
tally different factors. (4) To any new or existing source sub-
403.14 Confidentiality. ject to Pretreatment Standards. Na-
403.15 Net/Gross calculation. tional Pretreatment Standards do not
403.16 Upset provision. apply to sources which Discharge to a
403.17 Bypass. sewer which is not connected to a
403.18 Modification of POTW pretreatment POTW Treatment Plant.
programs.
403.19 Provisions of specific applicability to [46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48
the Owatonna Waste Water Treatment FR 2776, Jan. 21, 1983; 60 FR 33932, June 29,
Facility. 1995]
403.20 Pretreatment Program Reinvention
Pilot Projects Under Project XL. § 403.2 Objectives of general
APPENDIX A TO PART 403—PROGRAM GUIDANCE
pretreatment regulations.
MEMORANDUM By establishing the responsibilities
APPENDIXES B–C TO PART 403 [RESERVED] of government and industry to imple-
APPENDIX D TO PART 403—SELECTED INDUS- ment National Pretreatment Standards
TRIAL SUBCATEGORIES CONSIDERED DILUTE this regulation fulfills three objectives:
FOR PURPOSES OF THE COMBINED (a) To prevent the introduction of
WASTESTREAM FORMULA
pollutants into POTWs which will
APPENDIX E TO PART 403—SAMPLING PROCE-
DURES
interfere with the operation of a
APPENDIX F [RESERVED] POTW, including interference with its
APPENDIX G TO PART 403—POLLUTANTS ELIGI- use or disposal of municipal sludge;
BLE FOR A REMOVAL CREDIT (b) To prevent the introduction of
pollutants into POTWs which will pass
AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
through the treatment works or other-
SOURCE: 46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, unless wise be incompatible with such works;
otherwise noted. and
(c) To improve opportunities to recy-
§ 403.1 Purpose and applicability.
cle and reclaim municipal and indus-
(a) This part implements sections trial wastewaters and sludges.
204(b)(1)(C), 208(b)(2) (C)(iii),
301(b)(1)(A)(ii), 301(b)(2) (A)(ii), 301(h)(5) § 403.3 Definitions.
and 301(i)(2), 304 (e) and (g), 307, 308, 309, For the purposes of this part:
402(b), 405, and 501(a) of the Federal (a) Except as discussed below, the
Water Pollution Control Act as amend- general definitions, abbreviations, and
ed by the Clean Water Act of 1977 (Pub. methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
L. 95–217) or ‘‘The Act’’. It establishes part 401 shall apply to this regulation.
responsibilities of Federal, State, and (b) The term Act means Federal
local government, industry and the Water Pollution Control Act, also
public to implement National known as the Clean Water Act, as
Pretreatment Standards to control pol- amended, 33 U.S.C. 1251, et seq.
lutants which pass through or interfere (c) The term Approval Authority
with treatment processes in Publicly means the Director in an NPDES State
Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) or with an approved State pretreatment
which may contaminate sewage sludge. program and the appropriate Regional
(b) This regulation applies: Administrator in a non-NPDES State
(1) To pollutants from non-domestic or NPDES State without an approved
sources covered by Pretreatment State pretreatment program.
Standards which are indirectly dis- (d) The term Approved POTW
charged into or transported by truck or Pretreatment Program or Program or
rail or otherwise introduced into POTW Pretreatment Program means a
POTWs as defined below in § 403.3; program administered by a POTW that
10
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.3
11
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.3 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
12
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.5
13
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.6 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
lower than 5.0, unless the works is spe- (3) Specific effluent limits shall not
cifically designed to accommodate be developed and enforced without in-
such Discharges; dividual notice to persons or groups
(3) Solid or viscous pollutants in who have requested such notice and an
amounts which will cause obstruction opportunity to respond.
to the flow in the POTW resulting in (d) Local limits. Where specific prohi-
Interference; bitions or limits on pollutants or pol-
(4) Any pollutant, including oxygen lutant parameters are developed by a
demanding pollutants (BOD, etc.) re- POTW in accordance with paragraph
leased in a Discharge at a flow rate (c) above, such limits shall be deemed
and/or pollutant concentration which Pretreatment Standards for the pur-
will cause Interference with the POTW. poses of section 307(d) of the Act.
(5) Heat in amounts which will in- (e) EPA enforcement actions under
hibit biological activity in the POTW section 309(f) of the Clean Water Act.
If, within 30 days after notice of an
resulting in Interference, but in no
Interference or Pass Through violation
case heat in such quantities that the
has been sent by EPA to the POTW,
temperature at the POTW Treatment
and to persons or groups who have re-
Plant exceeds 40 °C (104 °F) unless the
quested such notice, the POTW fails to
Approval Authority, upon request of
commence appropriate enforcement ac-
the POTW, approves alternate tem-
tion to correct the violation, EPA may
perature limits.
take appropriate enforcement action
(6) Petroleum oil, nonbiodegradable under the authority provided in section
cutting oil, or products of mineral oil 309(f) of the Clean Water Act.
origin in amounts that will cause in-
terference or pass through; [46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 51
FR 20430, June 4, 1986; 52 FR 1600, Jan. 14,
(7) Pollutants which result in the
1987; 55 FR 30129, July 24, 1990; 60 FR 33932,
presence of toxic gases, vapors, or June 29, 1995]
fumes within the POTW in a quantity
that may cause acute worker health § 403.6 National pretreatment stand-
and safety problems; ards: Categorical standards.
(8) Any trucked or hauled pollutants, National pretreatment standards
except at discharge points designated specifying quantities or concentrations
by the POTW. of pollutants or pollutant properties
(c) When specific limits must be devel- which may be discharged to a POTW by
oped by POTW. (1) Each POTW devel- existing or new industrial users in spe-
oping a POTW Pretreatment Program cific industrial subcategories will be
pursuant to § 403.8 shall develop and en- established as separate regulations
force specific limits to implement the under the appropriate subpart of 40
prohibitions listed in paragraphs (a)(1) CFR chapter I, subchapter N. These
and (b) of this section. Each POTW standards, unless specifically noted
with an approved pretreatment pro- otherwise, shall be in addition to all
gram shall continue to develop these applicable pretreatment standards and
limits as necessary and effectively en- requirements set forth in this part.
force such limits. (a) Category Determination Request—
(2) All other POTW’s shall, in cases (1) Application Deadline. Within 60 days
where pollutants contributed by after the effective date of a
User(s) result in Interference or Pass- Pretreatment Standard for a sub-
Through, and such violation is likely category under which an Industrial
to recur, develop and enforce specific User may be included, the Industrial
effluent limits for Industrial User(s), User or POTW may request that the
and all other users, as appropriate, Water Management Division Director
which, together with appropriate or Director, as appropriate, provide
changes in the POTW Treatment written certification on whether the
Plant’s facilities or operation, are nec- Industrial User falls within that par-
essary to ensure renewed and contin- ticular subcategory. If an existing In-
ued compliance with the POTW’s dustrial User adds or changes a process
NPDES permit or sludge use or dis- or operation which may be included in
posal practices. a subcategory, the existing Industrial
14
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.6
User must request this certification will, after determining that it contains
prior to commencing discharge from all of the information required by para-
the added or changed processes or oper- graph (2) of this section, consider the
ation. A New Source must request this submission, any additional evidence
certification prior to commencing dis- that may have been requested, and any
charge. Where a request for certifi- other available information relevant to
cation is submitted by a POTW, the the request. The Water Management
POTW shall notify any affected Indus- Division Director or Director will then
trial User of such submission. The In- make a written determination of the
dustrial User may provide written com- applicable subcategory and state the
ments on the POTW submission to the reasons for the determination.
Water Management Division Director (ii) Where the request is submitted to
or Director, as appropriate, within 30 the Director, the Director shall for-
days of notification. ward the determination described in
(2) Contents of Application. Each re- this paragraph to the Water Manage-
quest shall contain a statement: ment Division Director who may make
(i) Describing which subcategories a final determination. The Water Man-
might be applicable; and agement Division Director may waive
(ii) Citing evidence and reasons why receipt of these determinations. If the
a particular subcategory is applicable Water Management Division Director
and why others are not applicable. Any does not modify the Director’s decision
person signing the application state- within 60 days after receipt thereof, or
ment submitted pursuant to this sec- if the Water Management Division Di-
tion shall make the following certifi- rector waives receipt of the determina-
cation: tion, the Director’s decision is final.
I certify under penalty of law that this (iii) Where the request is submitted
document and all attachments were prepared by the Industrial User or POTW to the
under my direction or supervision in accord- Water Management Division Director
ance with a system designed to assure that or where the Water Management Divi-
qualified personnel properly gather and sion Director elects to modify the Di-
evaluate the information submitted. Based
rector’s decision, the Water Manage-
on my inquiry of the person or persons who
manage the system, or those persons directly ment Division Director’s decision will
responsible for gathering the information, be final.
the information submitted is, to the best of (iv) The Water Management Division
my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and Director or Director, as appropriate,
complete. I am aware that there are signifi- shall send a copy of the determination
cant penalties for submitting false informa- to the affected Industrial User and the
tion, including the possibility of fine and im- POTW. Where the final determination
prisonment for knowing violations.
is made by the Water Management Di-
(3) Deficient requests. The Water Man- vision Director, he or she shall send a
agement Division Director or Director copy of the determination to the Direc-
will only act on written requests for tor.
determinations that contain all of the (5) Requests for hearing and/or legal de-
information required. Persons who cision. Within 30 days following the
have made incomplete submissions will date of receipt of notice of the final de-
be notified by the Water Management termination as provided for by para-
Division Director or Director that graph (a)(4)(iv) of this section, the Re-
their requests are deficient and, unless quester may submit a petition to re-
the time period is extended, will be consider or contest the decision to the
given 30 days to correct the deficiency. Regional Administrator who shall act
If the deficiency is not corrected with- on such petition expeditiously and
in 30 days or within an extended period state the reasons for his or her deter-
allowed by the Water Management Di- mination in writing.
vision Director or the Director, the re- (b) Deadline for Compliance with Cat-
quest for a determination shall be de- egorical Standards. Compliance by exist-
nied. ing sources with categorical
(4) Final decision. (i) When the Water Pretreatment Standards shall be with-
Management Division Director or Di- in 3 years of the date the Standard is
rector receives a submittal he or she effective unless a shorter compliance
15
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.6 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
16
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.6
(d) Dilution Prohibited as Substitute for age daily flow’’ means a reasonable
Treatment. Except where expressly au- measure of the average daily flow for a
thorized to do so by an applicable 30-day period. For new sources, flows
Pretreatment Standard or Require- shall be estimated using projected val-
ment, no Industrial User shall ever in- ues. The alternative limit for a speci-
crease the use of process water, or in fied pollutant will be derived by the
any other way attempt to dilute a dis- use of either of the following formulas:
charge as a partial or complete sub- (i) Alternative concentration limit.
stitute for adequate treatment to
achieve compliance with a N
Pretreatment Standard or Require-
ment. The Control Authority (as de-
∑ C i Fi F − F
fined in § 403.12(a)) may impose mass C T = i =1N T D
FT
∑ Fi
limitations on Industrial Users which
are using dilution to meet applicable i =1
Pretreatment Standards or Require-
ments, or in other cases where the im- where
position of mass limitations is appro- CT=the alternative concentration limit for
priate. the combined wastestream.
(e) Combined wastestream formula. Ci=the categorical Pretreatment Standard
Where process effluent is mixed prior concentration limit for a pollutant in the
regulated stream i.
to treatment with wastewaters other Fi=the average daily flow (at least a 30-day
than those generated by the regulated average) of stream i to the extent that it is
process, fixed alternative discharge regulated for such pollutant.
limits may be derived by the Control FD=the average daily flow (at least a 30-day
Authority, as defined in § 403.12(a), or average) from: (a) Boiler blowdown
by the Industrial User with the written streams, non-contact cooling streams,
concurrence of the Control Authority. stormwater streams, and demineralizer
These alternative limits shall be ap- backwash streams; provided, however, that
where such streams contain a significant
plied to the mixed effluent. When de-
amount of a pollutant, and the combina-
riving alternative categorical limits, tion of such streams, prior to treatment,
the Control Authority or Industrial with an Industrial User’s regulated process
User shall calculate both an alter- wastestream(s) will result in a substantial
native daily maximum value using the reduction of that pollutant, the Control
daily maximum value(s) specified in Authority, upon application of the Indus-
the appropriate categorical trial User, may exercise its discretion to
Pretreatment Standard(s) and an alter- determine whether such stream(s) should
be classified as diluted or unregulated. In
native consecutive sampling day aver-
its application to the Control Authority,
age value using the monthly average the Industrial User must provide engineer-
value(s) specified in the appropriate ing, production, sampling and analysis and
categorical Pretreatment Standard(s). such other information so that the Control
The Industrial User shall comply with Authority can make its determination; or
the alternative daily maximum and (b) sanitary wastestreams where such
monthly average limits fixed by the streams are not regulated by a Categorical
Control Authority until the Control Pretreatment Standard; or (c) from any
process wastestreams which were or could
Authority modifies the limits or ap-
have been entirely exempted from categor-
proves an Industrial User modification ical Pretreatment Standards pursuant to
request. Modification is authorized paragraph 8 of the NRDC v. Costle Consent
whenever there is a material or signifi- Decree (12 ERC 1833) for one or more of the
cant change in the values used in the following reasons (see appendix D of this
calculation to fix alternative limits for part):
the regulated pollutant. An Industrial (1) The pollutants of concern are not de-
User must immediately report any tectable in the effluent from the Industrial
User (paragraph (8)(a)(iii));
such material or significant change to
(2) The pollutants of concern are present
the Control Authority. Where appro- only in trace amounts and are neither caus-
priate new alternative categorical lim- ing nor likely to cause toxic effects (para-
its shall be calculated within 30 days. graph (8)(a)(iii));
(1) Alternative limit calculation. For (3) The pollutants of concern are present in
purposes of these formulas, the ‘‘aver- amounts too small to be effectively reduced
17
EC15NO91.012</MATH>
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.6 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
by technologies known to the Administrator (2) The pollutants of concern are present
(paragraph (8)(a)(iii)); or only in trace amounts and are neither caus-
(4) The wastestream contains only pollut- ing nor likely to cause toxic effects (para-
ants which are compatible with the POTW graph (8)(a)(iii));
(paragraph (8)(b)(i)). (3) The pollutants of concern are present in
FT=The average daily flow (at least a 30-day amounts too small to be effectively reduced
average) through the combined treatment by technologies known to the Administrator
facility (includes Fi, FD and unregulated (paragraph (8)(a)(iii)); or
streams). (4) The wastestream contains only pollut-
N=The total number of regulated streams. ants which are compatible with the POTW
(paragraph (8)(b)(i)).
(ii) Alternative mass limit. FT=The average flow (at least a 30-day aver-
age) through the combined treatment fa-
cility (includes Fi, FD and unregulated
streams).
F −F
N N=The total number of regulated streams.
18
EC15NO91.013</MATH>
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.7
19
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.7 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
its sewage sludge in a municipal solid the average of the lowest 6 removals
waste landfill unit that meets the cri- shall be used. If there are less than 8
teria in 40 CFR part 258. samples with concentrations equal to
(v) NPDES permit limitations. The or above the limit of measurement, the
granting of removal credits will not Approval Authority may approve alter-
cause a violation of the POTW’s permit nate means for demonstrating Con-
limitations or conditions. Alter- sistent Removal. The term ‘‘measure-
natively, the POTW can demonstrate ment’’ refers to the ability of the ana-
to the Approval Authority that even lytical method or protocol to quantify
though it is not presently in compli- as well as identify the presence of the
ance with applicable limitations and substance in question.
conditions in its NPDES permit, it will (2) Consistent Removal Data. Influent
be in compliance when the Industrial and effluent operational data dem-
User(s) to whom the removal credit onstrating Consistent Removal or
would apply is required to meet its cat- other information, as provided for in
egorical Pretreatment Standard(s), as paragraph (b)(1) of this section, which
modified by the removal credit provi- demonstrates Consistent Removal of
sion. the pollutants for which discharge
(4) Calculation of revised discharge lim- limit revisions are proposed. This data
its. Revised discharge limits for a spe- shall meet the following requirements:
cific pollutant shall be derived by use (i) Representative Data; Seasonal. The
of the following formula: data shall be representative of yearly
and seasonal conditions to which the
x POTW is subjected for each pollutant
y= for which a discharge limit revision is
1− r proposed.
where: (ii) Representative Data; Quality and
x=pollutant discharge limit specified in the
Quantity. The data shall be representa-
applicable categorical Pretreatment tive of the quality and quantity of nor-
Standard mal effluent and influent flow if such
r=removal credit for that pollutant as estab- data can be obtained. If such data are
lished under paragraph (b) of this section unobtainable, alternate data or infor-
(percentage removal expressed as a propor- mation may be presented for approval
tion, i.e., a number between 0 and 1) to demonstrate Consistent Removal as
y=revised discharge limit for the specified provided for in paragraph (b)(1) of this
pollutant (expressed in same units as x)
section.
(b) Establishment of Removal Credits; (iii) Sampling Procedures: Composite.
Demonstration of Consistent Removal—(1) (A) The influent and effluent oper-
Definition of Consistent Removal. ‘‘Con- ational data shall be obtained through
sistent Removal’’ shall mean the aver- 24-hour flow-proportional composite
age of the lowest 50 percent of the re- samples. Sampling may be done manu-
moval measured according to para- ally or automatically, and discretely or
graph (b)(2) of this section. All sample continuously. For discrete sampling, at
data obtained for the measured pollut- least 12 aliquots shall be composited.
ant during the time period prescribed Discrete sampling may be flow-propor-
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section must tioned either by varying the time in-
be reported and used in computing Con- terval between each aliquot or the vol-
sistent Removal. If a substance is ume of each aliquot. All composites
measurable in the influent but not in must be flow-proportional to each
the effluent, the effluent level may be stream flow at time of collection of in-
assumed to be the limit of measure- fluent aliquot or to the total influent
ment, and those data may be used by flow since the previous influent ali-
the POTW at its discretion and subject quot. Volatile pollutant aliquots must
to approval by the Approval Authority. be combined in the laboratory imme-
If the substance is not measurable in diately before analysis.
the influent, the date may not be used. (B)(1) Twelve samples shall be taken
Where the number of samples with con- at approximately equal intervals
centrations equal to or above the limit throughout one full year. Sampling
of measurement is between 8 and 12, must be evenly distributed over the
20
EC15NO91.014</MATH>
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.7
days of the week so as to include no- tion and affect the results. A grab sam-
workdays as well as workdays. If the ple is an individual sample collected
Approval Authority determines that over a period of time not exceeding 15
this schedule will not be most rep- minutes.
resentative of the actual operation of (v) Analytical methods. The sampling
the POTW Treatment Plant, an alter- referred to in paragraphs (b)(2) (i)
native sampling schedule will be ap- through (iv) of this section and an
proved. analysis of these samples shall be per-
(2) In addition, upon the Approval formed in accordance with the tech-
Authority’s concurrence, a POTW may niques prescribed in 40 CFR part 136
utilize an historical data base amassed and amendments thereto. Where 40
prior to the effective data of this sec- CFR part 136 does not contain sampling
tion provide that such data otherwise or analytical techniques for the pollut-
meet the requirements of this para- ant in question, or where the Adminis-
graph. In order for the historical data trator determines that the part 136
base to be approved it must present a sampling and analytical techniques are
statistically valid description of daily, inappropriate for the pollutant in ques-
weekly and seasonal sewage treatment tion, sampling and analysis shall be
plant loadings and performance for at performed using validated analytical
least one year. methods or any other applicable sam-
(C) Effluent sample collection need pling and analytical procedures, in-
not be delayed to compensate for hy- cluding procedures suggested by the
draulic detention unless the POTW POTW or other parties, approved by
elects to include detention time com- the Administrator.
pensation or unless the Approval Au- (vi) Calculation of removal. All data
thority requires detention time com- acquired under the provisions of this
pensation. The Approval Authority section must be submitted to the Ap-
may require that each effluent sample proval Authority. Removal for a spe-
be taken approximately one detention cific pollutant shall be determined ei-
time later than the corresponding in- ther, for each sample, by measuring
fluent sample when failure to do so the difference between the concentra-
would result in an unrepresentative tions of the pollutant in the influent
portrayal of actual POTW operation. and effluent of the POTW and express-
The detention period is to be based on ing the difference as a percent of the
a 24-hour average daily flow value. The influent concentration, or, where such
average daily flow used will be based data cannot be obtained, Removal may
upon the average of the daily flows be demonstrated using other data or
during the same month of the previous procedures subject to concurrence by
year. the Approval Authority as provided for
(iv) Sampling Procedures: Grab. Where in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
composite sampling is not an appro- (c) Provisional credits. For pollutants
priate sampling technique, a grab sam- which are not being discharged cur-
ple(s) shall be taken to obtain influent rently (i.e., new or modified facilities,
and effluent operational data. Collec- or production changes) the POTW may
tion of influent grab samples should apply for authorization to give removal
precede collection of effluent samples credits prior to the initial discharge of
by approximately one detention period. the pollutant. Consistent removal shall
The detention period is to be based on be based provisionally on data from
a 24-hour average daily flow value. The treatability studies or demonstrated
average daily flow used will be based removal at other treatment facilities
upon the average of the daily flows where the quality and quantity of in-
during the same month of the previous fluent are similar. Within 18 months
year. Grab samples will be required, for after the commencement of discharge
example, where the parameters being of pollutants in question, consistent re-
evaluated are those, such as cyanide moval must be demonstrated pursuant
and phenol, which may not be held for to the requirements of paragraph (b) of
any extended period because of biologi- this section. If, within 18 months after
cal, chemical or physical interactions the commencement of the discharge of
which take place after sample collec- the pollutant in question, the POTW
21
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00021 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.7 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
22
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00022 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.7
time of any pretreatment program ap- more that 180 days from public notice
proval or any NPDES permit of an application to complete review.
reissuance thereunder. (6) EPA review of State removal credit
(e) POTW application for authorization approvals. Where the NPDES State has
to give removal credits and Approval Au- an approved pretreatment program, the
thority review—(1) Who must apply. Any Regional Administrator may agree in
POTW that wants to give a removal the Memorandum of Agreement under
credit must apply for authorization 40 CFR 123.24(d) to waive the right to
from the Approval Authority. review and object to submissions for
(2) To whom application is made. An authority to grant removal credits.
application for authorization to give Such an agreement shall not restrict
removal credits (or modify existing the Regional Administrator’s right to
ones) shall be submitted by the POTW comment upon or object to permits
to the Approval Authority. issued to POTW’s except to the extent
(3) When to apply. A POTW may apply 40 CFR 123.24(d) allows such restric-
for authorization to give or modify re- tion.
moval credits at any time. (7) Nothing in these regulations pre-
(4) Contents of the Application. An ap- cludes an Industrial User or other in-
plication for authorization to give re- terested party from assisting the
moval credits must be supported by the POTW in preparing and presenting the
following information: information necessary to apply for au-
thorization.
(i) List of pollutants. A list of pollut-
(f) Continuation and withdrawal of
ants for which removal credits are pro-
authorization—(1) Effect of authoriza-
posed.
tion. (i) Once a POTW has received au-
(ii) Consistent Removal Data. The data
thorization to grant removal credits
required pursuant to paragraph (b) of
for a particular pollutant regulated in
this section.
a categorical Pretreatment Standard it
(iii) Calculation of revised discharge may automatically extend that re-
limits. Proposed revised discharge lim- moval credit to the same pollutant
its for each affected subcategory of In- when it is regulated in other categor-
dustrial Users calculated in accordance ical standards, unless granting the re-
with paragraph (a)(4) of this section. moval credit will cause the POTW to
(iv) Local Pretreatment Program Cer- violate the sludge requirements identi-
tification. A certification that the fied in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) of this sec-
POTW has an approved local tion or its NPDES permit limits and
pretreatment program or qualifies for conditions as required by paragraph
the exception to this requirement (a)(3)(v) of this section. If a POTW
found at paragraph (d) of this section. elects at a later time to extend re-
(v) Sludge Management Certification. A moval credits to a certain categorical
specific description of the POTW’s cur- Pretreatment Standard, industrial sub-
rent methods of using or disposing of category or one or more Industrial
its sludge and a certification that the Users that initially were not granted
granting of removal credits will not removal credits, it must notify the Ap-
cause a violation of the sludge require- proval Authority.
ments identified in paragraph (a)(3)(iv) (2) Inclusion in POTW permit. Once au-
of this section. thority is granted, the removal credits
(vi) NPDES Permit Limit Certification. shall be included in the POTW’s
A certification that the granting of re- NPDES Permit as soon as possible and
moval credits will not cause a viola- shall become an enforceable require-
tion of the POTW’s NPDES permit lim- ment of the POTW’s NPDES permit.
its and conditions as required in para- The removal credits will remain in ef-
graph (a)(3)(v) of this section. fect for the term of the POTW’s
(5) Approval Authority Review. The NPDES permit, provided the POTW
Approval Authority shall review the maintains compliance with the condi-
POTW’s application for authorization tions specified in paragraph (f)(4) of
to give or modify removal credits in this section.
accordance with the procedures of (3) Compliance monitoring. Following
§ 403.11 and shall, in no event, have authorization to give removal credits,
23
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.7 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
24
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.7
(ii) The POTW has identified cir- ument) published on December 16, 1975,
cumstances in which an Overflow event by EPA Office of Water Program Oper-
can reasonably be expected to occur, ations (WH–546). (See appendix A.) Re-
and has a notification or other viable visions to discharge limits in categor-
plan to insure that Industrial Users ical Pretreatment Standards may not
will learn of an impending Overflow in be made where efforts have not been
sufficient time to contain, cease or re- committed to by the POTW to mini-
duce Discharging to prevent untreated mize pollution from Overflows. At min-
Overflows from occurring. The POTW imum, by July 1, 1983, the POTW must
must also demonstrate that it will have completed the analysis required
monitor and verify the data required in by PRM 75–34 and be making an effort
paragraph (h)(1)(iii) of this section, to
to implement the plan.
insure that Industrial Users are con-
taining, ceasing or reducing operations (iii) If, by July 1, 1983, a POTW has
during POTW System Overflow; and begun the PRM 75–34 analysis but due
(iii) All Industrial Users to which the to circumstances beyond its control
POTW proposes to apply this provision has not completed it, Consistent Re-
have demonstrated the ability and moval, subject to the approval of the
commitment to collect and make Approval Authority, may continue to
available, upon request by the POTW, be claimed according to the formula in
State Director or EPA Regional Ad- paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section as
ministrator, daily flow reports or other long as the POTW acts in a timely
data sufficient to demonstrate that all fashion to complete the analysis and
Discharges from regulated processes makes an effort to implement the non-
containing the pollutant for which the structural cost-effective measures
allowance is requested were contained, identified by the analysis; and so long
reduced or otherwise ceased, as appro- as the POTW has expressed its willing-
priate, during all circumstances in ness to apply, after completing the
which an Overflow event was reason- analysis, for a construction grant nec-
ably expected to occur; or essary to implement any other cost-ef-
(2)(i) The Consistent Removal fective Overflow controls identified in
claimed is reduced pursuant to the fol- the analysis should Federal funds be-
lowing equation: come available, so applies for such
funds, and proceeds with the required
8760−Z
rc = rm construction in an expeditious manner.
8760 In addition, Consistent Removal may,
subject to the approval of the Approval
where:
Authority, continue to be claimed ac-
rm = POTW’s Consistent Removal rate for cording to the formula in paragraph
that pollutant as established under para-
(h)(2)(i) of this section where the POTW
graphs (a)(1) and (b)(2) of this section
rc = removal corrected by the Overflow factor has completed and the Approval Au-
Z = hours per year that Overflow occurred thority has accepted the analysis re-
between the Industrial User(s) and the quired by PRM 75–34 and the POTW has
POTW Treatment Plant, the hours either requested inclusion in its NPDES per-
to be shown in the POTW’s current NPDES mit of an acceptable compliance sched-
permit application or the hours, as dem-
ule providing for timely implementa-
onstrated by verifiable techniques, that a
particular Industrial User’s Discharge tion of cost-effective measures identi-
Overflows between the Industrial User and fied in the analysis. (In considering
the POTW Treatment Plant; and what is timely implementation, the
(ii) After July 1, 1983, Consistent Re- Approval Authority shall consider the
moval may be claimed only where ef- availability of funds, cost of control
forts to correct the conditions result- measures, and seriousness of the water
ing in untreated Discharges by the quality problem.)
POTW are underway in accordance [49 FR 31221, Aug. 3, 1984, as amended at 51
with the policy and procedures set FR 20430, June 4, 1986; 53 FR 42435, Nov. 5,
forth in ‘‘PRM 75–34’’ or ‘‘Program 1987; 58 FR 9386, Feb. 19, 1993; 58 FR 18017,
Guidance Memorandum–61’’ (same doc- Apr. 7, 1993]
25
EC15NO91.015</MATH>
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.8 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
26
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.8
at all times be fully and effectively ex- tion of the pollutants to be monitored,
ercised and implemented. sampling location, sampling frequency,
(1) Legal authority. The POTW shall and sample type, based on the applica-
operate pursuant to legal authority en- ble general pretreatment standards in
forceable in Federal, State or local part 403 of this chapter, categorical
courts, which authorizes or enables the pretreatment standards, local limits,
POTW to apply and to enforce the re- and State and local law;
quirements of sections 307 (b) and (c), (E) Statement of applicable civil and
and 402(b)(8) of the Act and any regula- criminal penalties for violation of
tions implementing those sections. pretreatment standards and require-
Such authority may be contained in a ments, and any applicable compliance
statute, ordinance, or series of con- schedule. Such schedules may not ex-
tracts or joint powers agreements tend the compliance date beyond appli-
which the POTW is authorized to cable federal deadlines.
enact, enter into or implement, and (iv) Require (A) the development of a
which are authorized by State law. At compliance schedule by each Industrial
a minimum, this legal authority shall User for the installation of technology
enable the POTW to: required to meet applicable
(i) Deny or condition new or in- Pretreatment Standards and Require-
creased contributions of pollutants, or ments and (B) the submission of all no-
changes in the nature of pollutants, to tices and self–monitoring reports from
the POTW by Industrial Users where Industrial Users as are necessary to as-
such contributions do not meet appli- sess and assure compliance by Indus-
cable Pretreatment Standards and Re- trial Users with Pretreatment Stand-
quirements or where such contribu- ards and Requirements, including but
tions would cause the POTW to violate not limited to the reports required in
its NPDES permit; § 403.12.
(ii) Require compliance with applica- (v) Carry out all inspection, surveil-
ble Pretreatment Standards and Re- lance and monitoring procedures nec-
quirements by Industrial Users; essary to determine, independent of in-
(iii) Control through permit, order, formation supplied by Industrial Users,
or similar means, the contribution to compliance or noncompliance with ap-
the POTW by each Industrial User to plicable Pretreatment Standards and
ensure compliance with applicable Requirements by Industrial Users. Rep-
Pretreatment Standards and Require- resentatives of the POTW shall be au-
ments. In the case of Industrial Users thorized to enter any premises of any
identified as significant under 40 CFR Industrial User in which a Discharge
403.3(t), this control shall be achieved source or treatment system is located
through permits or equivalent indi- or in which records are required to be
vidual control mechanisms issued to kept under § 403.12(m) to assure compli-
each such user. Such control mecha- ance with Pretreatment Standards.
nisms must be enforceable and contain, Such authority shall be at least as ex-
at a minimum, the following condi- tensive as the authority provided under
tions: section 308 of the Act;
(A) Statement of duration (in no case (vi)(A) Obtain remedies for non-
more than five years); compliance by any Industrial User with
(B) Statement of non-transferability any Pretreatment Standard and Re-
without, at a minimum, prior notifica- quirement. All POTW’s shall be able to
tion to the POTW and provision of a seek injunctive relief for noncompli-
copy of the existing control mechanism ance by Industrial Users with
to the new owner or operator; Pretreatment Standards and Require-
(C) Effluent limits based on applica- ments. All POTWs shall also have au-
ble general pretreatment standards in thority to seek or assess civil or crimi-
part 403 of this chapter, categorical nal penalties in at least the amount of
pretreatment standards, local limits, $1,000 a day for each violation by Indus-
and State and local law; trial Users of Pretreatment Standards
(D) Self-monitoring, sampling, re- and Requirements.
porting, notification and recordkeeping (B) Pretreatment requirements which
requirements, including an identifica- will be enforced through the remedies
27
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.8 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
set forth in paragraph (f)(1)(vi)(A) of ments under sections 204(b) and 405 of
this section, will include but not be the Act and subtitles C and D of the
limited to, the duty to allow or carry Resource Conservation and Recovery
out inspections, entry, or monitoring Act. Within 30 days of approval pursu-
activities; any rules, regulations, or or- ant to 40 CFR 403.8(f)(6), of a list of sig-
ders issued by the POTW; any require- nificant industrial users, notify each
ments set forth in individual control significant industrial user of its status
mechanisms issued by the POTW; or as such and of all requirements appli-
any reporting requirements imposed by cable to it as a result of such status.
the POTW or these regulations. The (iv) Receive and analyze self-moni-
POTW shall have authority and proce- toring reports and other notices sub-
dures (after informal notice to the dis- mitted by Industrial Users in accord-
charger) immediately and effectively ance with the self-monitoring require-
to halt or prevent any discharge of pol- ments in § 403.12;
lutants to the POTW which reasonably (v) Randomly sample and analyze the
appears to present an imminent effluent from industrial users and con-
endangerment to the health or welfare duct surveillance activities in order to
of persons. The POTW shall also have identify, independent of information
authority and procedures (which shall supplied by industrial users, occasional
include notice to the affected indus- and continuing noncompliance with
trial users and an opportunity to re- pretreatment standards. Inspect and
spond) to halt or prevent any discharge sample the effluent from each Signifi-
to the POTW which presents or may cant Industrial User at least once a
present an endangerment to the envi- year. Evaluate, at least once every two
ronment or which threatens to inter- years, whether each such Significant
fere with the operation of the POTW. Industrial User needs a plan to control
The Approval Authority shall have au- slug discharges. For purposes of this
thority to seek judicial relief and may subsection, a slug discharge is any dis-
also use administrative penalty au- charge of a non-routine, episodic na-
thority when the POTW has sought a ture, including but not limited to an
monetary penalty which the Approval accidental spill or a non-customary
Authority believes to be insufficient. batch discharge. The results of such ac-
(vii) Comply with the confidentiality tivities shall be available to the Ap-
requirements set forth in § 403.14. proval Authority upon request. If the
(2) Procedures. The POTW shall de- POTW decides that a slug control plan
velop and implement procedures to en- is needed, the plan shall contain, at a
sure compliance with the requirements minimum, the following elements:
of a Pretreatment Program. At a min- (A) Description of discharge prac-
imum, these procedures shall enable tices, including non-routine batch dis-
the POTW to: charges;
(i) Identify and locate all possible In- (B) Description of stored chemicals;
dustrial Users which might be subject (C) Procedures for immediately noti-
to the POTW Pretreatment Program. fying the POTW of slug discharges, in-
Any compilation, index or inventory of cluding any discharge that would vio-
Industrial Users made under this para- late a prohibition under 40 CFR
graph shall be made available to the 403.5(b), with procedures for follow-up
Regional Administrator or Director written notification within five days;
upon request; (D) If necessary, procedures to pre-
(ii) Identify the character and vol- vent adverse impact from accidental
ume of pollutants contributed to the spills, including inspection and mainte-
POTW by the Industrial Users identi- nance of storage areas, handling and
fied under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this transfer of materials, loading and un-
section. This information shall be loading operations, control of plant
made available to the Regional Admin- site run-off, worker training, building
istrator or Director upon request; of containment structures or equip-
(iii) Notify Industrial Users identi- ment, measures for containing toxic
fied under paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this organic pollutants (including solvents),
section, of applicable Pretreatment and/or measures and equipment for
Standards and any applicable require- emergency response;
28
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.8
29
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.9 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
the time periods within which re- (i) Identify the provision of the legal
sponses will take place; authority under § 403.8(f)(1) which pro-
(iii) Identify (by title) the official(s) vides the basis for each procedure
responsible for each type of response; under § 403.8(f)(2);
(iv) Adequately reflect the POTW’s (ii) Identify the manner in which the
primary responsibility to enforce all POTW will implement the program re-
applicable pretreatment requirements quirements set forth in § 403.8, includ-
and standards, as detailed in 40 CFR ing the means by which Pretreatment
403.8 (f)(1) and (f)(2). Standards will be applied to individual
(6) The POTW shall prepare and Industrial Users (e.g., by order, permit,
maintain a list of its industrial users ordinance, etc.); and,
meeting the criteria in § 403.3(u)(1). The (iii) Identify how the POTW intends
list shall identify the criteria in
to ensure compliance with
§ 403.3(u)(1) applicable to each indus-
Pretreatment Standards and Require-
trial user and, for industrial users
ments, and to enforce them in the
meeting the criteria in § 403.3(u)(ii),
event of noncompliance by Industrial
shall also indicate whether the POTW
Users;
has made a determination pursuant to
§ 403.3(u)(2) that such industrial user (2) A copy of any statutes, ordi-
should not be considered a significant nances, regulations, agreements, or
industrial user. The initial list shall be other authorities relied upon by the
submitted to the Approval Authority POTW for its administration of the
pursuant to § 403.9 as a non-substantial Program. This Submission shall in-
modification pursuant to § 403.18(d). clude a statement reflecting the en-
Modifications to the list shall be sub- dorsement or approval of the local
mitted to the Approval Authority pur- boards or bodies responsible for super-
suant to § 403.12(i)(1). vising and/or funding the POTW
Pretreatment Program if approved;
[46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 49
FR 31224, Aug. 3, 1984; 51 FR 20429, 20430, June (3) A brief description (including or-
4, 1986; 51 FR 23759, July 1, 1986; 53 FR 40612, ganization charts) of the POTW organi-
Oct. 17, 1988; 55 FR 30129, July 24, 1990; 58 FR zation which will administer the
18017, Apr. 7, 1993; 60 FR 33932, June 29, 1995; Pretreatment Program. If more than
62 FR 38414, July 17, 1997] one agency is responsible for adminis-
tration of the Program the responsible
§ 403.9 POTW pretreatment programs agencies should be identified, their re-
and/or authorization to revise
pretreatment standards: Submis- spective responsibilities delineated,
sion for approval. and their procedures for coordination
set forth; and
(a) Who approves Program. A POTW
requesting approval of a POTW (4) A description of the funding levels
Pretreatment Program shall develop a and full- and part-time manpower
program description which includes the available to implement the Program;
information set forth in paragraphs (c) Conditional POTW program ap-
(b)(1) through (4) of this section. This proval. The POTW may request condi-
description shall be submitted to the tional approval of the Pretreatment
Approval Authority which will make a Program pending the acquisition of
determination on the request for pro- funding and personnel for certain ele-
gram approval in accordance with the ments of the Program. The request for
procedures described in § 403.11. conditional approval must meet the re-
(b) Contents of POTW program submis- quirements set forth in paragraph (b)
sion. The program description must of this section except that the require-
contain the following information: ments of paragraph (b) of this section,
(1) A statement from the City Solic- may be relaxed if the Submission dem-
itor or a city official acting in a com- onstrates that:
parable capacity (or the attorney for (1) A limited aspect of the Program
those POTWs which have independent does not need to be implemented im-
legal counsel) that the POTW has au- mediately;
thority adequate to carry out the pro- (2) The POTW had adequate legal au-
grams described in § 403.8. This state- thority and procedures to carry out
ment shall: those aspects of the Program which
30
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.10
31
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Program in accordance with the re- porated into the POTW Permit; and
quirements of this section constitutes carry out inspection, surveillance and
grounds for withdrawal of NPDES pro- monitoring procedures which will de-
gram approval under section 402(c)(3) of termine, independent of information
the Act. supplied by the Industrial User, wheth-
(d) [Reserved] er the Industrial User is in compliance
(e) State Program in lieu of POTW Pro- with Pretreatment Standards;
gram. Notwithstanding the provision of (iv) Seek civil and criminal penalties,
§ 403.8(a), a State with an approved and injunctive relief, for noncompli-
Pretreatment Program may assume re- ance by the POTW with pretreatment
sponsibility for implementing the conditions incorporated into the POTW
POTW Pretreatment Program require- Permit and for noncompliance with
ments set forth in § 403.8(f) in lieu of re- Pretreatment Standards by Industrial
quiring the POTW to develop a Users as set forth in § 403.8(f)(1)(vi). The
Pretreatment Program. However, this Director shall have authority to seek
does not preclude POTW’s from inde- judicial relief for noncompliance by In-
pendently developing Pretreatment dustrial Users even when the POTW
Programs. has acted to seek such relief (e.g., if
(f) State Pretreatment Program require- the POTW has sought a penalty which
ments. In order to be approved, a re- the Director finds to be insufficient);
quest for State Pretreatment Program (v) Approve and deny requests for ap-
Approval must demonstrate that the proval of POTW Pretreatment Pro-
State Pretreatment Program has the grams submitted by a POTW to the Di-
following elements: rector;
(1) Legal authority. The Attorney (vi) Deny and recommend approval of
General’s Statement submitted in ac- (but not approve) requests for Fun-
cordance with paragraph (g)(1)(i) of damentally Different Factors variances
this section shall certify that the Di- submitted by Industrial Users in ac-
rector has authority under State law to cordance with the criteria and proce-
operate and enforce the State dures set forth in § 403.13; and
Pretreatment Program to the extent (vii) Approve and deny requests for
required by this part and by 40 CFR authority to modify categorical
123.27. At a minimum, the Director Pretreatment Standards to reflect re-
shall have the authority to: movals achieved by the POTW in ac-
(i) Incorporate POTW Pretreatment cordance with the criteria and proce-
Program conditions into permits issued dures set forth in §§ 403.7, 403.9 and
to POTW’s; require compliance by 403.11.
POTW’s with these incorporated per- (2) Procedures. The Director shall
mit conditions; and require compliance have developed procedures to carry out
by Industrial Users with Pretreatment the requirements of sections 307 (b) and
Standards; (c), and 402(b)(1), 402(b)(2), 402(b)(8), and
(ii) Ensure continuing compliance by 402(b)(9) of the Act. At a minimum,
POTW’s with pretreatment conditions these procedures shall enable the Di-
incorporated into the POTW Permit rector to:
through review of monitoring reports (i) Identify POTW’s required to de-
submitted to the Director by the velop Pretreatment Programs in ac-
POTW in accordance with § 403.12 and cordance with § 403.8(a) and notify
ensure continuing compliance by In- these POTW’s of the need to develop a
dustrial Users with Pretreatment POTW Pretreatment Program. In the
Standards through the review of self- absence of a POTW Pretreatment Pro-
monitoring reports submitted to the gram, the State shall have procedures
POTW or to the Director by the Indus- to carry out the activities set forth in
trial Users in accordance with § 403.12; § 403.8(f)(2);
(iii) Carry out inspection, surveil- (ii) Provide technical and legal as-
lance and monitoring procedures which sistance to POTW’s in developing
will determine, independent of infor- Pretreatment Programs;
mation supplied by the POTW, compli- (iii) Develop compliance schedules
ance or noncompliance by the POTW for inclusion in POTW Permits which
with pretreatment conditions incor- set forth the shortest reasonable time
32
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.10
schedule for the completion of tasks (ii) Copies of all State statutes and
needed to implement a POTW regulations cited in the above state-
Pretreatment Program. The final com- ment;
pliance date in these schedules shall be (iii) States with approved
no later than July 1, 1983; Pretreatment Programs shall establish
(iv) Sample and analyze: Pretreatment regulations by November
(A) Influent and effluent of the 16, 1989, unless the State would be re-
POTW to identify, independent of in- quired to enact or amend statutory
formation supplied by the POTW, com- provision, in which case, such regula-
pliance or noncompliance with pollut- tions must be established by November
ant removal levels set forth in the 16, 1990.
POTW permit (see § 403.7); and (2) A description of the funding levels
(B) The contents of sludge from the and full- and part-time personnel avail-
POTW and methods of sludge disposal able to implement the program; and
and use to identify, independent of in- (3) Any modifications or additions to
formation supplied by the POTW, com- the Memorandum of Agreement (re-
pliance or noncompliance with require- quired by 40 CFR 123.24) which may be
ments applicable to the selected meth- necessary for EPA and the State to im-
od of sludge management; plement the requirements of this part.
(v) Investigate evidence of violations
(h) EPA Action. Any approved NPDES
of pretreatment conditions set forth in
State requesting State Pretreatment
the POTW Permit by taking samples
Program approval shall submit to the
and acquiring other information as
Regional Administrator three copies of
needed. This data acquisition shall be
the Submission described in paragraph
performed with sufficient care as to
(g) of this section. Upon a preliminary
produce evidence admissible in an en-
determination that the Submission
forcement proceeding or in court;
meets the requirements of paragraph
(vi) Review and approve requests for
(g) the Regional Administrator shall:
approval of POTW Pretreatment Pro-
grams and authority to modify cat- (1) Notify the Director that the Sub-
egorical Pretreatment Standards sub- mission has been received and is under
mitted by a POTW to the Director; and review; and
(vii) Consider requests for Fundamen- (2) Commence the program revision
tally Different Factors variances sub- process set out in 40 CFR 123.62. For
mitted by Industrial Users in accord- purposes of that section all requests for
ance with the criteria and procedures approval of State Pretreatment Pro-
set forth in § 403.13. grams shall be deemed substantial pro-
(3) Funding. The Director shall assure gram modifications. A comment period
that funding and qualified personnel of at least 30 days and the opportunity
are available to carry out the authori- for a hearing shall be afforded the pub-
ties and procedures described in para- lic on all such proposed program revi-
graphs (f)(1) and (2) of this section. sions.
(g) Content of State Pretreatment Pro- (i) Notification where submission is de-
gram submission. The request for State fective. If, after review of the Submis-
Pretreatment Program approval will sion as provided for in paragraph (h) of
consist of: this section, EPA determines that the
(1)(i) A statement from the State At- Submission does not comply with the
torney General (or the Attorney for requirements of paragraph (f) or (g) of
those State agencies which have inde- this section EPA shall so notify the ap-
pendent legal counsel) that the laws of plying NPDES State in writing. This
the State provide adequate authority notification shall identify any defects
to implement the requirements of this in the Submission and advise the
part. The authorities cited by the At- NPDES State of the means by which it
torney General in this statement shall can comply with the requirements of
be in the form of lawfully adopted this part.
State statutes or regulations which [46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 51
shall be effective by the time of ap- FR 20429, June 4, 1986; 53 FR 40612, Oct. 17,
proval of the State Pretreatment Pro- 1988; 55 FR 30131, July 24, 1990; 58 FR 18017,
gram; and Apr. 7, 1993; 60 FR 33932, June 29, 1995]
33
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.11 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
34
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.12
Authority shall approve or deny the § 403.7, for removal of pollutants sub-
Submission based upon the evaluation ject to Pretreatment Standards.
in paragraph (a) of this section and (f) Public access to submission. The Ap-
taking into consideration comments proval Authority shall ensure that the
submitted during the comment period Submission and any comments upon
and the record of the public hearing, if such Submission are available to the
held. Where the Approval Authority public for inspection and copying.
makes a determination to deny the re- [46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 49
quest, the Approval Authority shall so FR 31224, Aug. 3, 1984; 51 FR 20429, June 4,
notify the POTW and each person who 1986; 53 FR 40613, Oct. 17, 1988; 62 FR 38414,
has requested individual notice. This July 17, 1997]
notification shall include suggested
modifications and the Approval Au- § 403.12 Reporting requirements for
thority may allow the requestor addi- POTW’s and industrial users.
tional time to bring the Submission (a) Definition. The term Control Au-
into compliance with applicable re- thority as it is used in this section re-
quirements. fers to: (1) The POTW if the POTW’s
(d) EPA objection to Director’s decision. Submission for its pretreatment pro-
No POTW pretreatment program or au- gram (§ 403.3(t)(1)) has been approved in
thorization to grant removal allow- accordance with the requirements of
ances shall be approved by the Director § 403.11; or (2) the Approval Authority if
if following the 30 day (or extended) the Submission has not been approved.
evaluation period provided for in para- (b) Reporting requirements for indus-
graph (b)(1)(ii) of this section and any trial users upon effective date of categor-
hearing held pursuant to paragraph ical pretreatment standard—baseline re-
(b)(2) of this section the Regional Ad- port. Within 180 days after the effective
ministrator sets forth in writing objec- date of a categorical Pretreatment
tions to the approval of such Submis- Standard, or 180 days after the final ad-
sion and the reasons for such objec- ministrative decision made upon a cat-
tions. A copy of the Regional Adminis- egory determination submission under
trator’s objections shall be provided to § 403.6(a)(4), whichever is later, existing
the applicant, and each person who has Industrial Users subject to such cat-
requested individual notice. The Re- egorical Pretreatment Standards and
gional Administrator shall provide an currently discharging to or scheduled
opportunity for written comments and to discharge to a POTW shall be re-
may convene a public hearing on his or quired to submit to the Control Au-
her objections. Unless retracted, the thority a report which contains the in-
Regional Administrator’s objections formation listed in paragraphs (b)(1)–
shall constitute a final ruling to deny (7) of this section. At least 90 days
approval of a POTW pretreatment pro- prior to commencement of discharge,
gram or authorization to grant re- New Sources, and sources that become
moval allowances 90 days after the date Industrial Users subsequent to the pro-
the objections are issued. mulgation of an applicable categorical
(e) Notice of decision. The Approval Standard, shall be required to submit
Authority shall notify those persons to the Control Authority a report
who submitted comments and partici- which contains the information listed
pated in the public hearing, if held, of in paragraphs (b)(1)–(5) of this section.
the approval or disapproval of the Sub- New sources shall also be required to
mission. In addition, the Approval Au- include in this report information on
thority shall cause to be published a the method of pretreatment the source
notice of approval or disapproval in the intends to use to meet applicable
same newspapers as the original notice pretreatment standards. New Sources
of request for approval of the Submis- shall give estimates of the information
sion was published. The Approval Au- requested in paragraphs (b) (4) and (5)
thority shall identify in any notice of of this section:
POTW Pretreatment Program approval (1) Identifying information. The User
any authorization to modify categor- shall submit the name and address of
ical Pretreatment Standards which the the facility including the name of the
POTW may make, in accordance with operator and owners;
35
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.12 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(2) Permits. The User shall submit a resentative sample of the effluent
list of any environmental control per- being discharged.
mits held by or for the facility; (iv) The User shall take a minimum
(3) Description of operations. The User of one representative sample to com-
shall submit a brief description of the pile that data necessary to comply
nature, average rate of production, and with the requirements of this para-
Standard Industrial Classification of graph.
the operation(s) carried out by such In- (v) Samples should be taken imme-
dustrial User. This description should diately downstream from pretreatment
include a schematic process diagram
facilities if such exist or immediately
which indicates points of Discharge to
downstream from the regulated process
the POTW from the regulated proc-
if no pretreatment exists. If other
esses.
(4) Flow measurement. The User shall wastewaters are mixed with the regu-
submit information showing the meas- lated wastewater prior to pretreatment
ured average daily and maximum daily the User should measure the flows and
flow, in gallons per day, to the POTW concentrations necessary to allow use
from each of the following: of the combined wastestream formula
(i) Regulated process streams; and of § 403.6(e) in order to evaluate compli-
(ii) Other streams as necessary to ance with the Pretreatment Standards.
allow use of the combined wastestream Where an alternate concentration or
formula of § 403.6(e). (See paragraph mass limit has been calculated in ac-
(b)(5)(v) of this section.) cordance with § 403.6(e) this adjusted
The Control Authority may allow for limit along with supporting data shall
verifiable estimates of these flows be submitted to the Control Authority;
where justified by cost or feasibility (vi) Sampling and analysis shall be
considerations. performed in accordance with the tech-
(5) Measurement of pollutants. (i) The niques prescribed in 40 CFR part 136
user shall identify the Pretreatment and amendments thereto. Where 40
Standards applicable to each regulated CFR part 136 does not contain sampling
process; or analytical techniques for the pollut-
(ii) In addition, the User shall submit ant in question, or where the Adminis-
the results of sampling and analysis trator determines that the part 136
identifying the nature and concentra- sampling and analytical techniques are
tion (or mass, where required by the inappropriate for the pollutant in ques-
Standard or Control Authority) of reg- tion, sampling and analysis shall be
ulated pollutants in the Discharge performed by using validated analyt-
from each regulated process. Both ical methods or any other applicable
daily maximum and average concentra- sampling and analytical procedures, in-
tion (or mass, where required) shall be cluding procedures suggested by the
reported. The sample shall be rep- POTW or other parties, approved by
resentative of daily operations; the Administrator;
(iii) A minimum of four (4) grab sam-
(vii) The Control Authority may
ples must be used for pH, cyanide, total
phenols, oil and grease, sulfide, and allow the submission of a baseline re-
volatile organics. For all other pollut- port which utilizes only historical data
ants, 24-hour composite samples must so long as the data provides informa-
be obtained through flow-proportional tion sufficient to determine the need
composite sampling techniques where for industrial pretreatment measures;
feasible. The Control Authority may (viii) The baseline report shall indi-
waive flow-proportional composite cate the time, date and place, of sam-
sampling for any Industrial User that pling, and methods of analysis, and
demonstrates that flow-proportional shall certify that such sampling and
sampling is infeasible. In such cases, analysis is representative of normal
samples may be obtained through time- work cycles and expected pollutant
proportional composite sampling tech- Discharges to the POTW;
niques or through a minimum of four (6) Certification. A statement, re-
(4) grab samples where the User dem- viewed by an authorized representative
onstrates that this will provide a rep- of the Industrial User (as defined in
36
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.12
paragraph (k) of this section) and cer- hiring an engineer, completing prelimi-
tified to by a qualified professional, in- nary plans, completing final plans, exe-
dicating whether Pretreatment Stand- cuting contract for major components,
ards are being met on a consistent commencing construction, completing
basis, and, if not, whether additional construction, etc.).
operation and maintenance (O and M) (2) No increment referred to in para-
and/or additional pretreatment is re- graph (c)(1) of this section shall exceed
quired for the Industrial User to meet 9 months.
the Pretreatment Standards and Re- (3) Not later than 14 days following
quirements; and each date in the schedule and the final
(7) Compliance schedule. If additional date for compliance, the Industrial
pretreatment and/or O and M will be User shall submit a progress report to
required to meet the Pretreatment the Control Authority including, at a
Standards; the shortest schedule by minimum, whether or not it complied
which the Industrial User will provide with the increment of progress to be
such additional pretreatment and/or O met on such date and, if not, the date
and M. The completion date in this on which it expects to comply with this
schedule shall not be later than the increment of progress, the reason for
compliance date established for the ap- delay, and the steps being taken by the
plicable Pretreatment Standard. Industrial User to return the construc-
(i) Where the Industrial User’s cat- tion to the schedule established. In no
egorical Pretreatment Standard has event shall more than 9 months elapse
been modified by a removal allowance
between such progress reports to the
(§ 403.7), the combined wastestream for-
Control Authority.
mula (§ 403.6(e)), and/or a Fundamen-
(d) Report on compliance with categor-
tally Different Factors variance
(§ 403.13) at the time the User submits ical pretreatment standard deadline.
the report required by paragraph (b) of Within 90 days following the date for
this section, the information required final compliance with applicable cat-
by paragraphs (b)(6) and (7) of this sec- egorical Pretreatment Standards or in
tion shall pertain to the modified lim- the case of a New Source following
its. commencement of the introduction of
(ii) If the categorical Pretreatment wastewater into the POTW, any Indus-
Standard is modified by a removal al- trial User subject to Pretreatment
lowance (§ 403.7), the combined Standards and Requirements shall sub-
wastestream formula (§ 403.6(e)), and/or mit to the Control Authority a report
a Fundamentally Different Factors containing the information described
variance (§ 403.13) after the User sub- in paragraphs (b) (4)–(6) of this section.
mits the report required by paragraph For Industrial Users subject to equiva-
(b) of this section, any necessary lent mass or concentration limits es-
amendments to the information re- tablished by the Control Authority in
quested by paragraphs (b)(6) and (7) of accordance with the procedures in
this section shall be submitted by the § 403.6(c), this report shall contain a
User to the Control Authority within reasonable measure of the User’s long
60 days after the modified limit is ap- term production rate. For all other In-
proved. dustrial Users subject to categorical
(c) Compliance schedule for meeting Pretreatment Standards expressed in
categorical Pretreatment Standards. The terms of allowable pollutant discharge
following conditions shall apply to the per unit of production (or other meas-
schedule required by paragraph (b)(7) of ure of operation), this report shall in-
this section: clude the User’s actual production dur-
(1) The schedule shall contain incre- ing the appropriate sampling period.
ments of progress in the form of dates (e) Periodic reports on continued com-
for the commencement and completion pliance. (1) Any Industrial User subject
of major events leading to the con- to a categorical Pretreatment Stand-
struction and operation of additional ard, after the compliance date of such
pretreatment required for the Indus- Pretreatment Standard, or, in the case
trial User to meet the applicable cat- of a New Source, after commencement
egorical Pretreatment Standards (e.g., of the discharge into the POTW, shall
37
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.12 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
38
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.12
39
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.12 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
hazardous wastes for which the Indus- lars), if authority to sign documents
trial User has submitted initial notifi- has been assigned or delegated to the
cation under 40 CFR 403.12(p). manager in accordance with corporate
(k) Compliance schedule for POTW’s. procedures.
The following conditions and reporting (2) By a general partner or proprietor
requirements shall apply to the com- if the Industrial User submitting the
pliance schedule for development of an reports required by paragraphs (b), (d)
approvable POTW Pretreatment Pro- and (e) of this section is a partnership
gram required by § 403.8. or sole proprietorship respectively.
(1) The schedule shall contain incre- (3) By a duly authorized representa-
ments of progress in the form of dates tive of the individual designated in
for the commencement and completion paragraph (l)(1) or (l)(2) of this section
of major events leading to the develop- if:
ment and implementation of a POTW (i) The authorization is made in writ-
Pretreatment Program (e.g., acquiring ing by the individual described in para-
required authorities, developing fund- graph (l)(1) or (l)(2);
ing mechanisms, acquiring equipment); (ii) The authorization specifies either
(2) No increment referred to in para- an individual or a position having re-
graph (h)(1) of this section shall exceed sponsibility for the overall operation of
nine months; the facility from which the Industrial
(3) Not later than 14 days following Discharge originates, such as the posi-
each date in the schedule and the final tion of plant manager, operator of a
date for compliance, the POTW shall well, or well field superintendent, or a
submit a progress report to the Ap- position of equivalent responsibility, or
proval Authority including, as a min- having overall responsibility for envi-
imum, whether or not it complied with ronmental matters for the company;
the increment of progress to be met on and
such date and, if not, the date on which (iii) the written authorization is sub-
it expects to comply with this incre- mitted to the Control Authority.
ment of progress, the reason for delay, (4) If an authorization under para-
and the steps taken by the POTW to re- graph (l)(3) of this section is no longer
turn to the schedule established. In no accurate because a different individual
event shall more than nine months or position has responsibility for the
elapse between such progress reports to overall operation of the facility, or
the Approval Authority. overall responsibility for environ-
(l) Signatory requirements for industrial mental matters for the company, a new
user reports. The reports required by authorization satisfying the require-
paragraphs (b), (d), and (e) of this sec- ments of paragraph (l)(3) of this section
tion shall include the certification must be submitted to the Control Au-
statement as set forth in thority prior to or together with any
§ 403.6(a)(2)(ii), and shall be signed as reports to be signed by an authorized
follows: representative.
(1) By a responsible corporate officer, (m) Signatory requirements for POTW
if the Industrial User submitting the reports. Reports submitted to the Ap-
reports required by paragraphs (b), (d) proval Authority by the POTW in ac-
and (e) of this section is a corporation. cordance with paragraph (h) of this sec-
For the purpose of this paragraph, a re- tion must be signed by a principal ex-
sponsible corporate officer means (i) a ecutive officer, ranking elected official
president, secretary, treasurer, or vice- or other duly authorized employee if
president of the corporation in charge such employee is responsible for over-
of a principal business function, or any all operation of the POTW.
other person who performs similar (n) Provisions Governing Fraud and
policy- or decision-making functions False Statements: The reports and
for the corporation, or (ii) the manager other documents required to be sub-
of one or more manufacturing, produc- mitted or maintained under this sec-
tion, or operation facilities employing tion shall be subject to:
more than 250 persons or having gross (1) The provisions of 18 U.S.C. section
annual sales or expenditures exceeding 1001 relating to fraud and false state-
$25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dol- ments;
40
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.12
41
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
such quantities of any hazardous waste person believing that factors relating
do not require additional notification. to an Industrial User are fundamen-
(3) In the case of any new regulations tally different from the factors consid-
under section 3001 of RCRA identifying ered during development of a categor-
additional characteristics of hazardous ical Pretreatment Standard applicable
waste or listing any additional sub- to that User and further, that the ex-
stance as a hazardous waste, the Indus- istence of those factors justifies a dif-
trial User must notify the POTW, the ferent discharge limit than specified in
EPA Regional Waste Management the applicable categorical
Waste Division Director, and State Pretreatment Standard, may request a
hazardous waste authorities of the dis- fundamentally different factors vari-
charge of such substance within 90 days ance under this section or such a vari-
of the effective date of such regula- ance request may be initiated by the
tions. EPA.
(4) In the case of any notification (c) Criteria—(1) General criteria. A re-
made under paragraph (p) of this sec- quest for a variance based upon fun-
tion, the Industrial User shall certify damentally different factors shall be
that it has a program in place to re- approved only if:
duce the volume and toxicity of haz- (i) There is an applicable categorical
ardous wastes generated to the degree Pretreatment Standard which specifi-
it has determined to be economically cally controls the pollutant for which
practical. alternative limits have been requested;
and
[46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 49
FR 31225, Aug. 3, 1984; 51 FR 20429, June 4,
(ii) Factors relating to the discharge
1986; 53 FR 40613, Oct. 17, 1988; 55 FR 30131, controlled by the categorical
July 24, 1990; 58 FR 18017, Apr. 7, 1993; 60 FR Pretreatment Standard are fundamen-
33932, June 29, 1995; 62 FR 38414, July 17, 1997] tally different from the factors consid-
ered by EPA in establishing the Stand-
§ 403.13 Variances from categorical ards; and
pretreatment standards for fun- (iii) The request for a variance is
damentally different factors. made in accordance with the proce-
(a) Definition. The term Requester dural requirements in paragraphs (g)
means an Industrial User or a POTW or and (h) of this section.
other interested person seeking a vari- (2) Criteria applicable to less stringent
ance from the limits specified in a cat- limits. A variance request for the estab-
egorical Pretreatment Standard. lishment of limits less stringent than
(b) Purpose and scope. In establishing required by the Standard shall be ap-
categorical Pretreatment Standards proved only if:
for existing sources, the EPA will take (i) The alternative limit requested is
into account all the information it can no less stringent than justified by the
collect, develop and solicit regarding fundamental difference;
the factors relevant to pretreatment (ii) The alternative limit will not re-
standards under section 307(b). In some sult in a violation of prohibitive dis-
cases, information which may affect charge standards prescribed by or es-
these Pretreatment Standards will not tablished under § 403.5;
be available or, for other reasons, will (iii) The alternative limit will not re-
not be considered during their develop- sult in a non-water quality environ-
ment. As a result, it may be necessary mental impact (including energy re-
on a case-by-case basis to adjust the quirements) fundamentally more ad-
limits in categorical Pretreatment verse than the impact considered dur-
Standards, making them either more ing development of the Pretreatment
or less stringent, as they apply to a Standards; and
certain Industrial User within an in- (iv) Compliance with the Standards
dustrial category or subcategory. This (either by using the technologies upon
will only be done if data specific to which the Standards are based or by
that Industrial User indicates it pre- using other control alternatives) would
sents factors fundamentally different result in either:
from those considered by EPA in devel- (A) A removal cost (adjusted for in-
oping the limit at issue. Any interested flation) wholly out of proportion to the
42
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.13
removal cost considered during devel- stalled, if such assertion is not based
opment of the Standards; or on factors listed in paragraph (d) of
(B) A non-water quality environ- this section;
mental impact (including energy re- (3) The User’s ability to pay for the
quirements) fundamentally more ad- required waste treatment; or
verse than the impact considered dur- (4) The impact of a Discharge on the
ing development of the Standards. quality of the POTW’s receiving wa-
(3) Criteria applicable to more stringent ters.
limits. A variance request for the estab-
(f) State or local law. Nothing in this
lishment of limits more stringent than
section shall be construed to impair
required by the Standards shall be ap-
proved only if: the right of any state or locality under
(i) The alternative limit request is no section 510 of the Act to impose more
more stringent than justified by the stringent limitations than required by
fundamental difference; and Federal law.
(ii) Compliance with the alternative (g) Application deadline. (1) Requests
limit would not result in either: for a variance and supporting informa-
(A) A removal cost (adjusted for in- tion must be submitted in writing to
flation) wholly out of proportion to the the Director or to the Administrator
removal cost considered during devel- (or his delegate), as appropriate.
opment of the Standards; or (2) In order to be considered, a re-
(B) A non-water quality environ- quest for a variance must be submitted
mental impact (including energy re- no later than 180 days after the date on
quirements) fundamentally more ad- which a categorical Pretreatment
verse than the impact considered dur- Standard is published in the FEDERAL
ing development of the Standards. REGISTER.
(d) Factors considered fundamentally (3) Where the User has requested a
different. Factors which may be consid- catergorical determination pursuant to
ered fundamentally different are:
§ 403.6(a), the User may elect to await
(1) The nature or quality of pollut-
the results of the category determina-
ants contained in the raw waste load of
tion before submitting a variance re-
the User’s process wastewater:
(2) The volume of the User’s process quest under this section. Where the
wastewater and effluent discharged; User so elects, he or she must submit
(3) Non-water quality environmental the variance request within 30 days
impact of control and treatment of the after a final decision has been made on
User’s raw waste load; the categorical determination pursuant
(4) Energy requirements of the appli- to § 403.6(a)(4).
cation of control and treatment tech- (h) Contents submission. Written sub-
nology; missions for variance requests, whether
(5) Age, size, land availability, and made to the Administrator (or his dele-
configuration as they relate to the gate) or the Director, must include:
User’s equipment or facilities; proc- (1) The name and address of the per-
esses employed; process changes; and son making the request;
engineering aspects of the application (2) Identification of the interest of
of control technology; the Requester which is affected by the
(6) Cost of compliance with required categorical Pretreatment Standard for
control technology. which the variance is requested;
(e) Factors which will not be considered
(3) Identification of the POTW cur-
fundamentally different. A variance re-
rently receiving the waste from the In-
quest or portion of such a request
under this section may not be granted dustrial User for which alternative dis-
on any of the following grounds: charge limits are requested;
(1) The feasibility of installing the (4) Identification of the categorical
required waste treatment equipment Pretreatment Standards which are ap-
within the time the Act allows; plicable to the Industrial User;
(2) The assertion that the Standards (5) A list of each pollutant or pollut-
cannot be achieved with the appro- ant parameter for which an alternative
priate waste treatment facilities in- discharge limit is sought;
43
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
44
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.15
45
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.16 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
limits are placed on process water pol- (2) The facility was at the time being
lutants either at the outfall or else- operated in a prudent and workman-
where. like manner and in compliance with
(3) Credit shall be granted only to the applicable operation and maintenance
extent necessary to meet the applica- procedures;
ble categorical Pretreatment Stand- (3) The Industrial User has submitted
ard(s), up to a maximum value equal to the following information to the POTW
the influent value. Additional moni- and Control Authority within 24 hours
toring may be necessary to determine of becoming aware of the Upset (if this
eligibility for credits and compliance information is provided orally, a writ-
with Standard(s) adjusted under this ten submission must be provided with-
section. in five days):
(4) Credit shall be granted only if the (i) A description of the Indirect Dis-
User demonstrates that the intake charge and cause of noncompliance;
water is drawn from the same body of (ii) The period of noncompliance, in-
water as that into which the POTW cluding exact dates and times or, if not
discharges. The Control Authority may corrected, the anticipated time the
waive this requirement if it finds that noncompliance is expected to continue;
no environmental degradation will re- (iii) Steps being taken and/or planned
sult. to reduce, eliminate and prevent recur-
(c) The applicable categorical rence of the noncompliance.
pretreatment standards contained in 40 (d) Burden of proof. In any enforce-
CFR subchapter N specifically provide ment proceeding the Industrial User
that they shall be applied on a net seeking to establish the occurrence of
basis. an Upset shall have the burden of
proof.
[53 FR 40614, Oct. 17, 1988, as amended at 58
FR 18017, Apr. 7, 1993] (e) Reviewability of agency consider-
ation of claims of upset. In the usual ex-
§ 403.16 Upset provision. ercise of prosecutorial discretion,
(a) Definition. For the purposes of Agency enforcement personnel should
this section, Upset means an excep- review any claims that non-compliance
tional incident in which there is unin- was caused by an Upset. No determina-
tentional and temporary noncompli- tions made in the course of the review
ance with categorical Pretreatment constitute final Agency action subject
Standards because of factors beyond to judicial review. Industrial Users will
the reasonable control of the Industrial have the opportunity for a judicial de-
User. An Upset does not include non- termination on any claim of Upset only
compliance to the extent caused by in an enforcement action brought for
operational error, improperly designed noncompliance with categorical
treatment facilities, inadequate treat- Pretreatment Standards.
ment facilities, lack of preventive (f) User responsibility in case of upset.
maintenance, or careless or improper The Industrial User shall control pro-
operation. duction or all Discharges to the extent
(b) Effect of an upset. An Upset shall necessary to maintain compliance with
constitute an affirmative defense to an categorical Pretreatment Standards
action brought for noncompliance with upon reduction, loss, or failure of its
categorical Pretreatment Standards if treatment facility until the facility is
the requirements of paragraph (c) are restored or an alternative method of
met. treatment is provided. This require-
(c) Conditions necessary for a dem- ment applies in the situation where,
onstration of upset. An Industrial User among other things, the primary
who wishes to establish the affirmative source of power of the treatment facil-
defense of Upset shall demonstrate, ity is reduced, lost or fails.
through properly signed, contempora- [46 FR 9439, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 53
neous operating logs, or other relevant FR 40615, Oct. 17, 1988]
evidence that:
(1) An Upset occurred and the Indus- § 403.17 Bypass.
trial User can identify the cause(s) of (a) Definitions. (1) Bypass means the
the Upset; intentional diversion of wastestreams
46
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.18
47
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.19 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
48
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 403.19
must notify the City in the event pro- wastestream due to activities of the
duction rates are expected to vary by Participating Industrial User. The fol-
more than 20 percent from a baseline lowing statement is to be included as a
production rate determined by comment to the periodic reports re-
Owatonna when it establishes a Par- quired by § 403.12(e):
ticipating Industrial User’s initial ‘‘Based on my inquiry of the person or per-
mass limit. To remain eligible to re- sons directly responsible for managing com-
ceive equivalent mass limits the Par- pliance with the pretreatment standard for
ticipating Industrial User must main- 40 CFR ll, I certify that, to the best of my
tain at least the same level of treat- knowledge and belief, the raw materials, in-
ment as at the time the equivalent dustrial processes, and potential by-products
mass limit is established. Upon notifi- have not contributed this pollutant to the
wastewaters since filing of the last periodic
cation of a revised production rate report under 40 CFR 403.12(e).’’
from a Participating Industrial User,
the City will reassess the appropriate- (e) If the average daily loading from
ness of the mass limit. Owatonna shall the Participating Industrial Users to
reestablish the concentration-based the Owatonna Waste Water Treatment
limit if a Participating Industrial User Facility is equal to or less than 0.68
does not maintain at least the same pounds per day of chromium, 0.25
level of treatment as when the equiva- pounds per day of copper, 1.17 pounds
lent mass limit was established. per day of nickel, and 1.01 pounds per
(c) If a categorical Participating In- day of zinc, Owatonna may authorize a
dustrial User of the Owatonna Waste categorical Participating Industrial
Water Treatment Facility has dem- User to satisfy the reporting require-
onstrated through sampling and other ments of § 403.12(e) with an annual re-
technical factors, including a compari- port provided on a date specified by
son of three years of effluent data with Owatonna, provided that the Partici-
background data, that pollutants regu- pating Industrial User has no reason-
lated through categorical able potential to violate a
Pretreatment Standards, other than 40 Pretreatment Standard for any pollut-
CFR part 414, are not expected to be ant for which reduced monitoring is
present in quantities greater than the being allowed, and has not been in Sig-
background influent concentration to nificant Noncompliance within the pre-
the industrial process, the City of vious three years.
Owatonna may reduce the sampling (f) The Owatonna Waste Water Treat-
frequency specified in § 403.8(f)(2)(v) to ment Facility in Owatonna, Minnesota
once during the term of the categorical shall post public notice of all Signifi-
Participating Industrial User’s permit. cant Noncompliance subject to the
(d) If a Participating Industrial User publication requirement in
is discharging to the Owatonna Waste § 403.8(f)(2)(vii) at the Minnesota Pollu-
Water Treatment Facility in tion Control Agency website for a pe-
Owatonna, Minnesota and is subject to riod of one year, as soon as practicable
a categorical Pretreatment Standard upon identifying the violations. In ad-
other than one codified at 40 CFR part dition, the Owatonna Waste Water
414, the City of Owatonna may author- Treatment Facility shall post an expla-
ize the Participating Industrial User to nation of how Significant Noncompli-
forego sampling of a pollutant if the ance is determined, and a contact name
Participating Industrial User has dem- and phone number for information re-
onstrated through sampling and other garding other, non-Significant Non-
technical factors, including a compari- compliance violations. If a violation is
son of three years of effluent data with not corrected within thirty (30) cal-
background data, that the pollutant is endar days or results in pass through
not expected to be present in quan- or interference at the Owatonna Waste
tities greater than the background in- Water Treatment Facility, publication
fluent concentration to the industrial must also be made in the format speci-
process, and the Participating Indus- fied in § 403.8(f)(2)(vii).
trial User certifies on each report, with (g) The provisions of this section
the following statement, that there has shall expire on October 6, 2005.
been no increase in the pollutant in its [65 FR 59747, Oct. 6, 2000]
49
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 403.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
§ 403.20 Pretreatment Program Re- overflows and by-passes vary greatly with
invention Pilot Projects Under the characteristics of the sewer and treat-
Project XL. ment system, the duration, intensity, fre-
quency and areal extent of precipitation, the
The Approval Authority may allow type and extent of development in the serv-
any publicly owned treatment works ice area, and the characteristics, uses and
(POTW) that has a final ‘‘Project XL’’ water quality standards of the receiving wa-
agreement to implement a ters. Decisions on grants for control of com-
Pretreatment Program that includes bined sewer overflows, therefore, must be
legal authorities and requirements made on a case-by-case basis after detailed
that are different than the administra- planning at the local level.
tive requirements otherwise applicable Where detailed planning has been com-
under this part. The POTW must sub- pleted, treatment or control of pollution
mit any such alternative requirements from wet-weather overflows and bypasses
as a substantial program modification may be given priority for construction grant
funds only after provision has been made for
in accordance with the procedures out-
secondary treatment of dry-weather flows in
lined in § 403.18. The approved modified the area. The detailed planning requirements
program must be incorporated as an and criteria for project approval follow.
enforceable part of the POTW’s NPDES
permit. The Approval Authority must B. Planning Requirements
include a reopener clause in the Construction grants may be approved for
POTW’s NPDES permit that directs control of pollution from combined sewer
the POTW to discontinue imple- overflows only if planning for the project
menting the approved alternative re- was thoroughly analyzed for the 20 year
quirements and resume implementa- planning period:
tion of its previously approved 1. Alternative control techniques which
pretreatment program if the Approval might be utilized to attain various levels of
Authority determines that the primary pollution control (related to alternative ben-
objectives of the Local Pilot eficial uses, if appropriate), including at
least initial consideration of all the alter-
Pretreatment Program are not being
natives described in the section on combined
met or the ‘‘Project XL’’ agreement ex- sewer and stormwater control in ‘‘Alter-
pires or is otherwise terminated. native Waste Management Techniques and
[66 FR 50339, Oct. 3, 2001] Best Practicable Waste Treatment’’ (Section
C of Chapter III of the information proposed
APPENDIX A TO PART 403—PROGRAM for comment in March 1974).
GUIDANCE MEMORANDUM 2. The costs of achieving the various levels
of pollution control by each of the tech-
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency niques appearing to be the most feasible and
cost-effective after the preliminary analysis.
DECEMBER 16, 1975. 3. The benefits to the receiving waters of a
Program Guidance Memorandum—61 range of levels of pollution control during
wet-weather conditions. This analysis will
Subject: Grants for Treatment and Control normally be conducted as part of State water
of Combined Sewer Overflows and quality management planning, 208 areawide
Stormwater Discharges. management planning, or other State, re-
From: John T. Rhett, Deputy Assistant Ad- gional or local planning effort.
ministrator for Water Program Oper- 4. The costs and benefits of addition of ad-
ations (WH–546).
vanced waste treatment processes to dry-
To: Regional Administrators, Regions I–X.
weather flows in the area.
This memorandum summarizes the Agen-
cy’s policy on the use of construction grants C. Criteria for Project Approval
for treatment and control of combined sewer
overflows and stormwater discharges during The final alternative selected shall meet
wet-weather conditions. The purpose is to as- the following criteria:
sure that projects are funded only when care- 1. The analysis required above has dem-
ful planning has demonstrated they are cost- onstrated that the level of pollution control
effective. provided will be necessary to protect a bene-
ficial use of the receiving water even after
I. COMBINED SEWER OVERFLOWS technology based standards required by Sec-
tion 301 of Pub. L. 92–500 are achieved by in-
A. Background
dustrial point sources and at least secondary
The costs and benefits of control of various treatment is achieved for dry-weather mu-
portions of pollution due to combined sewer nicipal flows in the area.
50
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 403, App. D
2. Provision has already been made for Enlargement of or otherwise adding to
funding of secondary treatment of dry- combined sewer conveyance systems is one
weather flows in the area. means of reducing or eliminating flooding
3. The pollution control technique pro- caused by wet-weather conditions. These ad-
posed for combined sewer overflow is a more ditions may be designed so as to produce
cost-effective means of protecting the bene- some benefits in terms of reduced discharge
ficial use of the receiving waters than other of pollutants to surrounding waterways. The
combined sewer pollution control techniques pollution control benefits of such flood con-
and the addition of treatment higher than trol measures, however, are likely to be
secondary treatment for dry-weather munic- small compared with the costs, and the
ipal flows in the area. measures therefore would normally be ineli-
gible for funding under the construction
4. The marginal costs are not substantial
grants program.
compared to marginal benefits.
All multi-purpose projects where less than
Marginal costs and benefits for each alter- 100% of the costs are eligible for construc-
native may be displayed graphically to assist tion grants under this policy shall contain a
with determining a project’s acceptability special grant condition precluding EPA fund-
under this criterion. Dollar costs should be ing of non-pollution control elements. This
compared with quantified pollution reduc- condition should, as a minimum, contain a
tion and water quality improvements. A de- provision similar to the following:
scriptive narrative should also be included ‘‘The grantee explicitly acknowledges and
analyzing monetary, social and environ- agrees that costs are allowable only to the
mental costs compared to benefits, particu- extent they are incurred for the water pollu-
larly the significance of the beneficial uses tion control elements of this project.’’
to be protected by the project. Additional special conditions should be in-
cluded as appropriate to assure that the
II. STORMWATER DISCHARGES grantee clearly understands which elements
Approaches for reducing pollution from of the project are eligible for construction
separate stormwater discharges are now in grants under Pub. L. 92–500.
the early stages of development and evalua-
tion. We anticipate, however, that in many APPENDIXES B–C TO PART 403
cases the benefits obtained by construction [RESERVED]
of treatment works for this purpose will be
small compared with the costs, and other APPENDIX D TO PART 403—SELECTED IN-
techniques of control and prevention will be DUSTRIAL SUBCATEGORIES CONSID-
more cost-effective. The policy of the Agen- ERED DILUTE FOR PURPOSES OF THE
cy is, therefore, that construction grants COMBINED WASTESTREAM FORMULA
shall not be used for construction of treat-
ment works to control pollution from sepa- The following industrial subcategories are
rate discharges of stormwater except under considered to have dilute wastestreams for
unusual conditions where the project clearly purposes of the combined wastestream for-
has been demonstrated to meet the planning mula. They either were or could have been
requirements and criteria described above excluded from categorical pretreatment
for combined sewer overflows. standards pursuant to paragraph 8 of the
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., et
III. MULTI-PURPOSE PROJECTS al. v. Costle Consent Decree for one or more
of the following four reasons: (1) The pollut-
Projects with multiple purposes, such as ants of concern are not detectable in the ef-
flood control and recreation in addition to fluent from the industrial user (paragraph
pollution control, may be eligible for an 8(a)(iii)); (2) the pollutants of concern are
amount not to exceed the cost of the most present only in trace amounts and are nei-
cost-effective single purpose pollution abate- ther causing nor likely to cause toxic effects
ment system. Normally the Separable Costs- (paragraph 8(a)(iii)); (3) the pollutants of
Remaining Benefits (SCRB) method should concern are present in amounts too small to
be used to allocate costs between pollution be effectively reduced by technologies known
control and other purposes, although in un- to the Administrator (paragraph 8(a)(iii)); or
usual cases another method may be appro- (4) the wastestream contains only pollutants
priate. For such cost allocation, the cost of which are compatible with the POTW (para-
the least cost pollution abatement alter- graph 8(b)(i)). In some instances, different
native may be used as a substitute measure rationales were given for exclusion under
of the benefits for that purpose. The method paragraph 8. However, EPA has reviewed
is described in ‘‘Proposed Practices for Eco- these subcategories and has determined that
nomic Analysis of River Basin Projects,’’ exclusion could have occurred due to one of
GPO, Washington, D.C., 1958, and ‘‘Efficiency the four reasons listed above.
in Government through Systems Analysis,’’ This list is complete as of October 9, 1986.
by Roland N. McKean, John Wiley & Sons, It will be updated periodically for the con-
Inc., 1958. venience of the reader.
51
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 403, App. D 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Auto and Other Laundries (40 CFR part 444) Asphalt Concrete
Carpet and Upholstery Cleaning Asphalt Emulsion
Coin-Operated Laundries and Dry Cleaning Linoleum
Diaper Services Printed Asphalt Felt
Dry Cleaning Plants except Rug Cleaning Roofing
Industrial Laundries
Pulp, Paper, and Paperboard, and Builders’
Laundry and Garment Services, Not Else-
Paper and Board Mills (40 CFR parts 430
where Classified
Linen Supply and 431)
Power Laundries, Family and Commercial Groundwood-Chemi-Mechanical
Electrical and Electronic Components 1 (40 CFR Rubber Manufacturing (40 CFR part 428)
part 469) Tire and Inner Tube Plants
Capacitors (Fluid Fill) Emulsion Crumb Rubber
Carbon and Graphite Products Solution Crumb Rubber
Dry Transformers Latex Rubber
Ferrite Electronic Devices Small-sized General Molded, Extruded and
Fixed Capacitors Fabricated Rubber Plants,2
Fluorescent Lamps
Medium-sided General Molded, Extruded
Fuel Cells
and Fabricated Rubber Plants 2
Incandescent Lamps
Magnetic Coatings Large-sized General Molded, Extruded and
Mica Paper Dielectric Fabricated Rubber Plants 2
Motors, Generators, Alternators Wet Digestion Reclaimed Rubber
Receiving and Transmitting Tubes Pan, Dry Digestion, and Mechanical Re-
Resistance Heaters claimed Rubber
Resistors Latex Dipped, Latex-Extruded, and Latex-
Swithchgear Molded Rubber 3
Transformer (Fluid Fill) Latex Foam 4
Metal Molding and Casting (40 CFR part 464) Soap and Detergent Manufacturing (40 CFR
Nickel Casting part 417)
Tin Casting Soap Manufacture by Batch Kettle
Titanium Casting
Fatty Acid Manufacture by Fat Splitting
Gum and Wood Chemicals (40 CFR part 454)
Char and Charcoal Briquets Soap Manufacture by Fatty Acid
Inorganic Chemicals Manufacturing (40 CFR Neutralization
part 415) Glycerine Concentration
Ammonium Chloride Glycerine Distillation
Ammonium Hydroxide Manufacture of Soap Flakes and Powders
Barium Carbonate Manufacture of Bar Soaps
Calcium Carbonate Manufacture of Liquid Soaps
Carbon Dioxide Manufacture of Spray Dried Detergents
Carbon Monoxide and Byproduct Hydrogen Manufacture of Liquid Detergents
Hydrochloric Acid
Manufacture of Dry Blended Detergents
Hydrogen Peroxide (Organic Process)
Nitric Acid Manufacture of Drum Dried Detergents
Oxygen and Nitrogen Manufacture of Detergent Bars and Cakes
Potassium Iodide Textile Mills (40 CFR part 410)
Sodium Chloride (Brine Mining Process) Apparel manufacturing
Sodium Hydrosulfide Cordage and Twine
Sodium Hydrosulfite Padding and Upholstery Filling
Sodium Metal Timber Products Processing (40 CFR part 429)
Sodium Silicate Barking Process
Sodium Thiosulfate Finishing Processes
Sulfur Dioxide
Hardboard—Dry Process
Sulfuric Acid
Leather (40 CFR part 425) [51 FR 36372, Oct. 9, 1986]
Gloves
Luggage
2 Footnote: Except for production attrib-
Paving and Roofing (40 CFR part 443)
uted to lead-sheathed hose manufacturing
1 The Paragraph 8 exemption for the manu- operations.
3 Footnote: Except for production attrib-
facture of products in the Electrical and
Electronic Components Category is for oper- uted to chromic acid form-cleaning oper-
ations not covered by Electroplating/Metal ations.
Finishing pretreatment regulations (40 CFR 4 Footnote: Except for production that gen-
52
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 403, App. G
APPENDIX E TO PART 403—SAMPLING age of the daily flows during the same month
PROCEDURES of the previous year. Grab sampling should
be employed where the pollutants being eval-
I. COMPOSITE METHOD uated are those, such as cyanide and phenol,
A. It is recommended that influent and ef- which may not be held for an extended pe-
fluent operational data be obtained through riod because of biological, chemical or phys-
24-hour flow proportional composite samples. ical interaction which take place after sam-
Sampling may be done manually or auto- ple collection and affect the results.
matically, and discretely or continuously. If [49 FR 31225, Aug. 3, 1984]
discrete sampling is employed, at least 12
aliquots should be composited. Discrete sam- APPENDIX F TO PART 403 [RESERVED]
pling may be flow proportioned either by
varying the time interval between each ali- APPENDIX G TO PART 403—POLLUTANTS
quot or the volume of each aliquot. All com-
ELIGIBLE FOR A REMOVAL CREDIT
posites should be flow proportional to either
the stream flow at the time of collection of
the influent aliquot or to the total influent
I. REGULATED POLLUTANTS IN PART 503
flow since the previous influent aliquot. ELIGIBLE FOR A REMOVAL CREDIT
Volatile pollutant aliquots must be com-
Use or disposal practice
bined in the laboratory immediately before Pollutants
analysis. LA SD I
B. Effluent sample collection need not be
delayed to compensate for hydraulic deten- Arsenic ..................... X X X
tion unless the POTW elects to include de- Beryllium .................. .................. .................. X
Cadmium ................. X .................. X
tention time compensation or unless the Ap-
Chromium ................ .................. X X
proval Authority requires detention time Copper ..................... X
compensation. The Approval Authority may Lead ......................... X .................. X
require that each effluent sample is taken Mercury .................... X .................. X
approximately one detention time later than Molybdenum ............ X
the corresponding influent sample when fail- Nickel ....................... X X X
ure to do so would result in an unrepresenta- Selenium .................. X
tive portrayal of actual POTW operation. Zinc .......................... X .............
The detention period should be based on a 24- Total hydrocarbons .. .................. .................. X1
hour average daily flow value. The average Key:
daily flow should in turn be based on the av- LA—land application.
erage of the daily flows during the same SD—surface disposal site without a liner and leachate col-
month of the previous year. lection system.
I—firing of sewage sludge in a sewage sludge incinerator.
1 The following organic pollutants are eligible for a removal
II. GRAB METHOD credit if the requirements for total hydrocarbons in subpart E
in 40 CFR Part 503 are met when sewage sludge is fired in a
If composite sampling is not an appro- sewage sludge incinerator: Acrylonitrile, Aldrin/Dieldrin(total),
priate technique, grab samples should be Benzene, Benzidine, Benzo(a)pyrene, Bis(2-chloroethyl)ether,
taken to obtain influent and effluent oper- Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate, Bromodichloromethane,
Bromoethane, Bromoform, Carbon tetrachloride, Chlordane,
ational data. A grab sample is an individual Chloroform, Chloromethane, DDD,DDE,DDT,
sample collected over a period of time not Dibromochloromethane, Dibutyl phthalate, 1,2-dichloroethane,
exceeding 15 minutes. The collection of influ- 1,1-dichloroethylene, 2,4-dichlorophenol, 1,3-dichloropropene,
ent grab samples should precede the collec- Diethyl phthalate, 2,4-dinitrophenol, 1,2-diphenylhydrazine, Di-
n-butyl phthalate, Endosulfan, Endrin, Ethylbenzene, Hepta-
tion of effluent samples by approximately chlor, Heptachlor epoxide, Hexachlorobutadiene, Alpha-
one detention period except that where the hexachlorocyclohexane, Beta-hexachlorocyclohexane,
detention period is greater than 24 hours Hexachlorocyclopentadiene, Hexachloroethane, Hydrogen cy-
anide, Isophorone, Lindane, Methylene chloride,
such staggering of the sample collection may Nitrobenzene, N-Nitrosodimethylamine, N-Nitrosodi-n-propyl-
not be necessary or appropriate. The deten- amine, Pentachlorophenol, Phenol, Polychlorinated biphenyls,
tion period should be based on a 24-hour av- 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin, 1,1,2,2,-tetrachloroethane,
Tetrachloroethylene, Toluene, Toxaphene, Trichloroethylene,
erage daily flow value. The average daily 1,2,4–Trichlorobenzene, 1,1,1–Trichloroethane, 1,1,2–Tri-
flow should in turn be based upon the aver- chloroethane, and 2,4,6–Trichlorophenol.
53
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8016 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 405 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
54
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 405
55
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
practicable control technology currently attainable by the application of the best
available. practicable control technology currently
405.83 [Reserved] available.
405.84 Pretreatment standards for existing 405.113 [Reserved]
sources. 405.114 Pretreatment standards for existing
405.85 Standards of performance for new sources.
sources. 405.115 Standards of performance for new
405.86 Pretreatment standards for new sources.
sources. 405.116 Pretreatment standards for new
405.87 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 405.117 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
conventional pollutant control tech- attainable by the application of the best
nology (BCT). conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT).
Subpart I—Condensed Milk Subcategory
405.90 Applicability; description of the con-
Subpart L—Dry Whey Subcategory
densed milk subcategory. 405.120 Applicability; description of the dry
405.91 Specialized definitions. whey subcategory.
405.92 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 405.121 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 405.122 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
practicable control technology currently attainable by the application of the best
available. practicable control technology currently
405.93 [Reserved] available.
405.94 Pretreatment standards for existing
405.123 [Reserved]
sources.
405.124 Pretreatment standards for existing
405.95 Standards of performance for new
sources.
sources.
405.125 Standards of performance for new
405.96 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
sources.
405.126 Pretreatment standards for new
405.97 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
405.127 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
conventional pollutant control tech-
attainable by the application of the best
nology (BCT).
conventional pollutant control tech-
Subpart J—Dry Milk Subcategory nology (BCT).
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b)
405.100 Applicability; description of the dry and (c) and 307(c) of the Federal Water Pollu-
milk subcategory. tion Control Act, as amended (the Act); 33
405.101 Specialized definitions. U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and
405.102 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (c), and 1317(c); 86 Stat. 816, et seq., Pub. L.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–217.
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently SOURCE: 39 FR 18597, May 28, 1974, unless
available. otherwise noted.
405.103 [Reserved]
405.104 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart A—Receiving Stations
405.105 Standards of performance for new Subcategory
sources.
405.106 Pretreatment standards for new § 405.10 Applicability; description of
sources. the receiving stations subcategory.
405.107 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- The provisions of this subpart are ap-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction plicable to discharges resulting from
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
the operation of receiving stations en-
nology (BCT). gaged in the assembly and reshipment
of bulk milk for the use of manufac-
Subpart K—Condensed Whey Subcategory turing or processing plants.
405.110 Applicability; description of the con- § 405.11 Specialized definitions.
densed whey subcategory.
405.111 Specialized definitions. For the purpose of this subpart:
405.112 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction eral definitions, abbreviations and
56
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.15
57
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.16 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
58
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.27
(b) For fluid products plants receiv- § 405.25 Standards of performance for
ing 250,000 lb/day or less of milk equiva- new sources.
lent (less than 25,900 lb/day of BOD5
Effluent limitations
input).
Average of daily
Effluent limitations Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
Average of daily day shall not
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 exceed—
for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not Metric units (kilograms per
exceed— 1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input) BOD5 ................................... 0.740 0.370
TSS ...................................... 0.925 .463
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
BOD5 ................................... 4.50 2.250
TSS ...................................... 6.750 3.375
pH ........................................ (1) (1) English units (pounds per 100
lb of BOD5 input)
English units (pounds per 100
lb of BOD5 input) BOD5 ................................... 0.074 0.037
TSS ...................................... 0.093 .046
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
BOD5 ................................... 0.450 0.225
TSS ...................................... 0.675 .338 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. § 405.26 Pretreatment standards for
new sources.
[39 FR 18597, May 28, 1974, as amended at 39 Any new source subject to this sub-
FR 32994, Sept. 13, 1974; 60 FR 33933, June 29, part that introduces process waste-
1995]
water pollutants into a publicly owned
§ 405.23 [Reserved] treatment works must comply with 40
CFR part 403.
§ 405.24 Pretreatment standards for [60 FR 33933, June 29, 1995]
existing sources.
Any existing source subject to this § 405.27 Effluent limitations guidelines
subpart that introduces process waste- representing the degree of effluent
water pollutants into a publicly owned reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best conventional pollut-
treatment works must comply with 40
ant control technology (BCT).
CFR part 403. In addition, the following
pretreatment standard establishes the Except as provided in §§ 125.30
quantity or quality of pollutants or through 125.32, any existing point
pollutant properties controlled by this source subject to this subpart shall
section which may be discharged to a achieve the following effluent limita-
publicly owned treatment works by a tions representing the degree of efflu-
point source subject to the provisions ent reduction attainable by the appli-
of this subpart. cation of the best conventional pollut-
ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard itations shall be the same as those
pH ................................................... No limitation. specified for conventional pollutants
BOD5 .............................................. Do. (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 405.22
TSS ................................................. Do. of this subpart for the best practicable
control technology currently available
[40 FR 6434, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 (BPT).
FR 33933, June 29, 1995]
[51 FR 24996, July 9, 1986]
59
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.30 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
60
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00060 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.42
61
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
62
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.54
63
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.55 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[40 FR 6434, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 Subpart F—Natural and Processed
FR 33934, June 29, 1995]
Cheese Subcategory
§ 405.55 Standards of performance for
new sources. § 405.60 Applicability; description of
the natural and processed cheese
The following standards of perform- subcategory.
ance establish the quantity or quality
of pollutants or pollutant properties, The provisions of this subpart are ap-
controlled by this section, which may plicable to discharges resulting from
be discharged by a new source subject the manufacture of natural cheese
to the provisions of this subpart: (hard curd) and processed cheese.
64
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00064 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.67
65
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00065 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.70 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
The provisions of this subpart are ap- BOD5 ................................... 2.20 0.880
plicable to discharges resulting from TSS ...................................... 3.30 1.320
the manufacture of fluid mixes for ice pH ........................................ (1) (1)
cream and other frozen desserts for English units (pounds per 100
later freezing in other plants; it does lb of BOD5 input)
not include freezing of the products as
one of the affected operations. BOD5 ................................... 0.220 0.068
TSS ...................................... 0.330 .132
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
§ 405.71 Specialized definitions. 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
For the purpose of this subpart: (b) For plants with a dairy products
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- input of 85,000 lb/day or less of milk
eral definitions, abbreviations and equivalent (less than 8.830 lb/day of
methods of analysis set forth in part BOD5 input).
401 of this chapter shall apply to this
Effluent limitations
subpart.
(b) The term ‘‘BOD5 input’’ shall Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
mean the biochemical oxygen demand for any 1 consecutive days
of the materials entered into process. day shall not
exceed—
It can be calculated by multiplying the
fats, proteins and carbohydrates by Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
factors of 0.890, 1.031 and 0.691 respec-
tively. Organic acids (e.g., lactic acids) BOD5 ................................... 2.926 1.463
should be included as carbohydrates. TSS ...................................... 4.388 2.194
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Composition of input materials may be
based on either direct analyses or gen- English units (pounds per 100
erally accepted published values. lb of BOD5 input)
66
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00066 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.81
Average of daily
§ 405.80 Applicability; description of
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 the ice cream, frozen desserts, nov-
for any 1 consecutive days elties and other dairy desserts sub-
day shall not category.
exceed—
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
plicable to discharges resulting from
the manufacture of ice cream, ice milk,
BOD5 ................................... 0.480 0.240 sherbert, water ices, stick confections,
TSS ...................................... 0.60 .30 frozen novelties products, frozen des-
pH ........................................ (1) (1) serts, melorine, pudding and other
dairy product base desserts. If fluid
English units (pounds per 100 mixes prepared at another plant are
lb of BOD5 input)
employed, the appropriate values from
BOD5 ................................... 0.048 0.024
subpart G should be deducted from the
TSS ...................................... 0.060 .030 limitations.
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within
§ 405.81 Specialized definitions.
the range 6.0 to 9.0.
For the purpose of this subpart:
§ 405.76 Pretreatment standards for (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
new sources. eral definitions, abbreviations and
Any new source subject to this sub- methods of analysis set forth in part
part that introduces process waste- 401 of this chapter, shall apply to this
subpart.
water pollutants into a publicly owned
(b) The term ‘‘BOD5 input’’ shall
treatment works must comply with 40
mean the biochemical oxygen demand
CFR part 403. of the materials entered into process.
[60 FR 33934, June 29, 1995] It can be calculated by multiplying the
fats, proteins and carbohydrates by
factors of 0.890, 1.031 and 0.691 respec-
tively. Organic acids (e.g., lactic acids)
should be included as carbohydrates.
67
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.82 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
68
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.92
69
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00069 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.93 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[39 FR 18597, May 28, 1974, as amended at 39 § 405.96 Pretreatment standards for
FR 32993, Sept. 13, 1974; 60 FR 33935, June 29, new sources.
1995]
Any new source subject to this sub-
§ 405.93 [Reserved] part that introduces process waste-
water pollutants into a publicly owned
§ 405.94 Pretreatment standards for treatment works must comply with 40
existing sources.
CFR part 403.
Any existing source subject to this
subpart that introduces process waste- [60 FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
water pollutants into a publicly owned
treatment works must comply with 40 § 405.97 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent
CFR part 403. In addition, the following
reduction attainable by the applica-
pretreatment standard establishes the tion of the best conventional pollut-
quantity or quality of pollutants or ant control technology (BCT).
pollutant properties controlled by this
section which may be discharged to a Except as provided in §§ 125.30
publicly owned treatment works by a through 125.32, any existing point
point source subject to the provisions source subject to this subpart shall
of this subpart. achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu-
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
pH ................................................... No limitation. cation of the best conventional pollut-
BOD5 .............................................. Do. ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
TSS ................................................. Do.
itations shall be the same as those
specified for conventional pollutants
[40 FR 6435, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 405.92
FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
of this subpart for the best practicable
§ 405.95 Standards of performance for control technology currently available
new sources. (BPT).
The following standards of perform- [51 FR 24996, July 9, 1986]
ance establish the quantity or quality
70
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.104
Average of daily
§ 405.100 Applicability; description of Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
the dry milk subcategory. for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
exceed—
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to discharges resulting from English units (pounds per 100
the manufacture of dry whole milk, dry lb of BOD5 input)
skim milk and dry buttermilk.
BOD5 ................................... 0.163 0.065
TSS ...................................... 0.244 .098
§ 405.101 Specialized definitions. pH ........................................ (1) (1)
For the purpose of this subpart: 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- (b) For milk drying plants with an
eral definitions, abbreviations and input equivalent to 145,000 lb/day or
methods of analysis set forth in part less of milk equivalent (less than 15,070
401 of this chapter shall apply to this lb/day of BOD5 input).
subpart.
(b) The term ‘‘BOD5 input’’ shall Effluent limitations
mean the biochemical oxygen demand Average of daily
of the materials entered into process. Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
It can be calculated by multiplying the day shall not
fats, proteins and carbohydrates by exceed—
factors of 0.890, 1.031 and 0.691 respec- Metric units (kilograms per
tively. Organic acids (e.g., lactic acids) 1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
should be included as carbohydrates.
Composition of input materials may be BOD5 ................................... 2.176 1.088
TSS ...................................... 3.276 1.638
based on either direct analysis or gen- pH ........................................ (1) (1)
erally accepted published values.
English units (pounds per 100
§ 405.102 Effluent limitations guide- lb of BOD5 input)
lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the BOD5 ................................... 0.218 0.109
application of the best practicable TSS ...................................... 0.328 .164
control technology currently avail- pH ........................................ (1) (1)
able. 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
[39 FR 18597, May 28, 1974, as amended at 60
through 125.32, any existing point FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limita- § 405.103 [Reserved]
tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- § 405.104 Pretreatment standards for
cation of the best practicable control existing sources.
technology currently available (BPT): Any existing source subject to this
(a) For milk drying plants with an subpart that introduces process waste-
input equivalent to more than 145,000 water pollutants into a publicly owned
lb/day of milk equivalent (more than treatment works must comply with 40
15,070 lb/day of BOD5 input). CFR part 403. In addition, the following
pretreatment standard establishes the
Effluent limitations
quantity or quality of pollutants or
Average of daily pollutant properties controlled by this
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days section which may be discharged to a
day shall not publicly owned treatment works by a
exceed—
point source subject to the provisions
Metric units (kilograms per of this subpart.
1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
BOD5 ................................... 1.625 0.650
pH ................................................... No limitation.
TSS ...................................... 2.438 .975
BOD5 .............................................. Do.
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
TSS ................................................. Do.
71
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00071 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.105 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[40 FR 6435, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 405.102
FR 33935, June 29, 1995] of this subpart for the best practicable
§ 405.105 Standards of performance for control technology currently available
new sources. (BPT).
The following standards of perform- [51 FR 24996, July 9, 1986]
ance establish the quantity or quality
of pollutants or pollutant properties, Subpart K—Condensed Whey
controlled by this section, which may
be discharged by a new source subject
Subcategory
to the provisions of this subpart. § 405.110 Applicability; description of
Effluent limitations the condensed whey subcategory.
Average of daily The provisions of this subpart are ap-
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 plicable to discharges resulting from
for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not the manufacture of condensed sweet
exceed— whey and condensed acid whey.
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input) § 405.111 Specialized definitions.
72
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00072 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 405.116
English units (pounds per 100 Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
lb of BOD5 input)
pH ................................................... No limitation.
BOD5 ................................... 0.100 0.040 BOD5 .............................................. Do.
TSS ...................................... 0.150 .060 TSS ................................................. Do.
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. [40 FR 6435, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60
(b) For whey condensing plants with FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
300,000 lb/day or less of raw fluid whey
input (less than 20,700 lb/day of solids § 405.115 Standards of performance for
new sources.
or 14,160 lb/day of BOD5 input).
The following standards of perform-
Effluent limitations
ance establish the quantity or quality
Average of daily of pollutants or pollutant properties,
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days controlled by this section, which may
day shall not be discharged by a new source subject
exceed—
to the provisions of this subpart:
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input) Effluent limitations
Average of daily
BOD5 ................................... 1.30 0.650 Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
TSS ...................................... 1.950 .975 for any 1 consecutive days
pH ........................................ (1) (1) day shall not
exceed—
English units (pounds per 100
lb of BOD5 input) Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of BOD5 input)
BOD5 ................................... 0.130 0.065
TSS ...................................... 0.195 .098 BOD5 ................................... 0.220 0.110
pH ........................................ (1) (1) TSS ...................................... 0.276 .138
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. pH ........................................ (1) (1)
(c) For plants in the size range cov- English units (pounds per 100
ered in paragraph (b) once-through bar- lb of BOD5 input)
ometric condenser water may be dis-
charged untreated if the composite net BOD5 ................................... 0.022 0.011
TSS ...................................... 0.028 .014
entrainment is below 15 mg/1 of BOD5 pH ........................................ (1) (1)
for any one day and below 10 mg/1 of
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
BOD5 as the average for thirty con-
secutive days.
§ 405.116 Pretreatment standards for
[39 FR 18597, May 28, 1974, as amended at 60 new sources.
FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
Any new source subject to this sub-
§ 405.113 [Reserved] part that introduces process waste-
water pollutants into a publicly owned
§ 405.114 Pretreatment standards for treatment works must comply with 40
existing sources. CFR part 403.
Any existing source subject to this
subpart that introduces process waste- [60 FR 33935, June 29, 1995]
73
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 405.117 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
74
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00074 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 406
75
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00075 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 406 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
406.24 Pretreatment standards for existing Subpart E—Normal Rice Milling
sources. Subcategory
406.25 Standards of performance for new
sources. 406.50 Applicability; description of the nor-
406.26 Pretreatment standards for new mal rice milling subcategory.
sources. 406.51 Specialized definitions.
406.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
406.27 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently
conventional pollutant control tech- available.
nology (BCT). 406.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subpart C—Normal Wheat Flour Milling attainable by the application of the best
Subcategory available technology economically
achievable.
406.30 Applicability; description of the nor- 406.54 Pretreatment standards for existing
mal wheat flour milling subcategory. sources.
406.31 Specialized definitions. 406.55 Standards of performance for new
406.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 406.56 Pretreatment standards for new
attainable by the application of the best sources.
practicable control technology currently 406.57 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
406.33 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT).
attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically
Subpart F—Parboiled Rice Processing
achievable.
Subcategory
406.34 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. 406.60 Applicability; description of the par-
406.35 Standards of performance for new boiled rice processing subcategory.
sources. 406.61 Specialized definitions.
406.36 Pretreatment standards for new 406.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
406.37 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction practicable control technology currently
attainable by the application of the best available.
conventional pollutant control tech- 406.63 [Reserved]
406.64 Pretreatment standards for existing
nology (BCT).
sources.
406.65 Standards of performance for new
Subpart D—Bulgur Wheat Flour Milling sources.
Subcategory 406.66 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
406.40 Applicability; description of the
406.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
bulgur wheat flour milling subcategory. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
406.41 Specialized definitions. attainable by the application of the best
406.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- conventional pollutant control tech-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction nology (BCT).
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently Subpart G—Animal Feed Subcategory
available.
406.43 [Reserved] 406.70 Applicability; description of the ani-
406.44 Pretreatment standards for existing mal feed subcategory.
406.71 Specialized definitions.
sources.
406.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
406.45 Standards of performance for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
406.46 Pretreatment standards for new practicable control technology currently
sources. available.
406.47 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 406.73 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- available technology economically
nology (BCT). achievable.
76
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.12
406.74 [Reserved] attainable by the application of the best
406.75 Standards of performance for new practicable control technology currently
sources. available.
406.76 Pretreatment standards for new 406.103–406.104 [Reserved]
sources. 406.105 Standards of performance for new
406.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 406.106 Pretreatment standards for new
attainable by the application of the best sources.
conventional pollutant control tech- 406.107 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
nology (BCT). resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Subpart H—Hot Cereal Subcategory conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT).
406.80 Applicability; description of the hot
cereal subcategory. AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b)
406.81 Specialized definitions. and (c), 307(c) of the Federal Water Pollution
406.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Control Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311,
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317(c); 86
Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567,
attainable by the application of the best
Pub. L. 95–217.
practicable control technology currently
available. SOURCE: 39 FR 10513, Mar. 20, 1974, unless
406.83 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- otherwise noted.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically
Subpart A—Corn Wet Milling
achievable. Subcategory
406.84 [Reserved]
406.85 Standards of performance for new § 406.10 Applicability; description of
sources. the corn wet milling subcategory.
406.86 Pretreatment standards for new The provisions of this subpart are ap-
sources. plicable to discharges resulting from
406.87 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- the process in which shelled corn is
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
steeped in a dilute solution of sulfurous
conventional pollutant control tech- acid and then processed by wet means
nology (BCT). into such products as animal feed, reg-
ular and modified starches, corn oil,
Subpart I—Ready-to-Eat Cereal corn syrup, and dextrose.
Subcategory
§ 406.11 Specialized definitions.
406.90 Applicability; description of the
ready-to-eat cereal subcategory.
For the purpose of this subpart:
406.91 Specialized definitions. (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
406.92 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- eral definitions, abbreviations and
resenting the degree of effluent reduction methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
attainable by the application of the best part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
practicable control technology currently (b) The term corn shall mean the
available. shelled corn delivered to a plant before
406.93–406.94 [Reserved] processing.
406.95 Standards of performance for new
(c) The term standard bushel shall
sources.
406.96 Pretreatment standards for new mean a bushel of shelled corn weighing
sources. 56 pounds.
406.97 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (d) The abbreviation MSBu shall
resenting the degree of effluent reduction mean 1000 standard bushels.
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- § 406.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
nology (BCT). representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica-
Subpart J—Wheat Starch and Gluten tion of the best practicable control
Subcategory technology currently available.
406.100 Applicability; description of the
(a) Except as provided in §§ 125.30
wheat starch and gluten subcategory. through 125.32, and subject to the pro-
406.101 Specialized definitions. visions in paragraph (b) of this section,
406.102 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- any existing point source subject to
resenting the degree of effluent reduction this subpart shall achieve the following
77
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
78
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.17
treatment works must comply with 40 (a) Subject to the provisions in para-
CFR part 403. In addition, the provi- graph (b) of this section, the following
sions set forth in paragraph (a) of this limitations establish the quantity or
section apply, as well as the following quality of pollutants or pollutant prop-
pretreatment standard which estab- erties, controlled by this section,
lishes the quantity or quality of pollut- which may be discharged by a point
ants or pollutant properties controlled source subject to the provisions of this
by this section which may be dis- subpart after application of the best
charged to publicly owned treatment available technology economically
works by a new source subject to the achievable:
provisions of this subpart.
Effluent limitations
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
pH ................................................... No limitation. for any 1 consecutive days
BOD5 .............................................. Do. day shall not
TSS ................................................. Do. exceed—
(a) Process waste water shall not be Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of corn)
discharged to a POTW at a flow rate or
pollutant mass loading rate which is BOD5 ................................... 1.08 0.36
excessive over any time period during TSS ...................................... 1.62 .54
the peak load at a POTW. Excessive pH ........................................ (1) (1)
discharges are defined as those in
which the flow of BOD5 or total sus- English units (pounds per
1,000 stdbu of corn)
pended solids (TSS) exceed the respec-
tive values of P from the following for- BOD5 ................................... 60 20
mula: TSS ...................................... 90 30
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
P = K(Q+R)¥S 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
79
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00079 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[42 FR 62372, Dec. 12, 1977. Redesignated and Effluent limitations
amended at 44 FR 50739, Aug. 29, 1979]
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum
EDITORIAL NOTE: Section 406.17 was indefi- values for 30 con-
for any 1 secutive days
nitely suspended at 45 FR 45582, July 7, 1980. day shall not exceed—
(a) The provisions of this subpart are English units (pounds per 1,000
applicable to discharges resulting from stdbu of corn)
the process in which shelled corn is
BOD5 ................................. 12.0 4.0
washed and subsequently milled by dry
TSS .................................... 10.5 3.5
processes into such products as corn pH ...................................... (1) (1)
meal, grits, flour, oil, and animal feed. 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(b) The provisions of this subpart do
not apply to discharges from subse- [39 FR 10513, Mar. 20, 1974, as amended at 60
quent manufacturing operations to FR 33936, June 29, 1995]
produce expanded or extruded feed or
feed products. § 406.23 [Reserved]
80
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00080 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.34
81
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00081 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.35 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard boiled, dried, and partially debranned
in the production of bulgur.
BOD5 .............................................. No limitation.
TSS ................................................. Do.
§ 406.41 Specialized definitions.
[40 FR 6436, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 For the purpose of the subpart:
FR 33936, June 29, 1995] (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
eral definitions, abbreviations and
§ 406.35 Standards of performance for methods of analysis set forth in part
new sources. 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
The following standards of perform- subpart.
ance establish the quantity or quality (b) The term wheat shall mean wheat
of pollutants or pollutant properties delivered to a plant before processing.
which may be discharged by a new (c) The term standard bushel shall
source subject to the provisions of this mean a bushel of wheat weighing 60
subpart: There shall be no discharge of pounds.
process waste water pollutants to navi- (d) The abbreviation MSBu shall
gable waters. mean 1,000 standard bushels.
82
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00082 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.52
83
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00083 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.53 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
84
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.70
85
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.71 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
86
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.90
87
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.91 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
88
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 406.106
SOURCE: 40 FR 920, Jan. 3, 1975, unless oth- [40 FR 920, Jan. 3, 1975, as amended at 60 FR
erwise noted. 33937, June 29, 1995]
§ 406.100 Applicability; description of §§ 406.103–406.104 [Reserved]
the wheat starch and gluten sub-
category. § 406.105 Standards of performance for
The provisions of this subpart are ap- new sources.
plicable to discharges resulting from The following standards of perform-
those industrial operations utilizing ance establish the quantity or quality
wheat flour as a raw material for pro- of pollutants or pollutant properties,
duction of wheat starch and gluten controlled by this section, which may
(protein) components through conven- be discharged by a new source subject
tional processes of physical separation to the provisions of this subpart:
and subsequent refinement.
Effluent limitations
§ 406.101 Specialized definitions. Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
For the purpose of this subpart: The for any 1 consecutive days
general definitions, abbreviations and day shall not
exceed—
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. Metric units (kg/kkg of raw
material (wheat flour))
§ 406.102 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef- BOD5 ................................... 3.0 1.0
TSS ...................................... 3.0 1.0
fluent reduction attainable by the pH ........................................ (1) (1)
application of the best practicable
control technology currently avail- English units (lb/1,000 lb of
able. raw material (wheat flour))
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
BOD5 ................................... 3.0 1.0
through 125.32, any existing point TSS ...................................... 3.0 1.0
source subject to this subpart shall pH ........................................ (1) (1)
achieve the following effluent limita- 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- § 406.106 Pretreatment standards for
cation of the best practicable control new sources.
technology currently available (BPT): Any new source subject to this sub-
Effluent limitations
part that introduces process waste-
water pollutants into a publicly owned
Average of daily treatment works must comply with 40
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days CFR part 403. In addition, the following
day shall not pretreatment standard establishes the
exceed—
quantity or quality of pollutants or
Metric units (kg/kkg of raw pollutant properties, controlled by this
material (wheat flour))
section, which may be discharged to a
BOD5 ................................... 6.0 2.0
publicly owned treatment works by a
TSS ...................................... 6.0 2.0 new point source subject to the provi-
pH ........................................ (1) (1) sions of this subpart.
English units (lb/1,000 lb of Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
raw material (wheat flour))
pH ................................................... No limitation.
BOD5 .............................................. Do.
BOD5 ................................... 6.0 2.0 TSS ................................................. Do.
TSS ...................................... 6.0 2.0
89
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00089 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 406.107 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[40 FR 920, Jan. 3, 1975, as amended at 60 FR 407.23 [Reserved]
33937, June 29, 1995] 407.24 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
§ 406.107 Effluent limitations guide- 407.25 Standards of performance for new
lines representing the degree of ef- sources.
fluent reduction attainable by the 407.26 Pretreatment standards for new
application of the best conventional sources.
pollutant control technology (BCT). 407.27 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 resenting the degree of effluent reduction
through 125.32, any existing point attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
source subject to this subpart shall nology (BCT).
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- Subpart C—Citrus Products Subcategory
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best conventional pollut- 407.30 Applicability; description of the cit-
ant control technology (BCT): The lim- rus products subcategory.
itations shall be the same as those 407.31 Specialized definitions.
407.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
specified for conventional pollutants resenting the degree of effluent reduction
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 406.102 attainable by the application of the best
of this subpart for the best practicable practicable control technology currently
control technology currently available available.
(BPT). 407.33 [Reserved]
407.34 Pretreatment standards for existing
[51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986]
sources.
407.35 Standards of performance for new
PART 407—CANNED AND PRE- sources.
SERVED FRUITS AND VEGETABLES 407.36 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
PROCESSING POINT SOURCE 407.37 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
CATEGORY resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Subpart A—Apple Juice Subcategory conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT).
Sec.
407.10 Applicability; description of the apple
Subpart D—Frozen Potato Products
juice subcategory.
407.11 Specialized definitions. Subcategory
407.12 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 407.40 Applicability; description of the fro-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction zen potato products subcategory.
attainable by the application of the best
407.41 Specialized definitions.
practicable control technology currently
407.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
407.13 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best
407.14 Pretreatment standards for existing
practicable control technology currently
sources.
available.
407.15 Standards of performance for new
sources. 407.43 [Reserved]
407.16 Pretreatment standards for new 407.44 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
407.17 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 407.45 Standards of performance for new
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources.
attainable by the application of the best 407.46 Pretreatment standards for new
conventional pollutant control tech- sources.
nology (BCT). 407.47 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subpart B—Apple Products Subcategory attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
407.20 Applicability; description of the apple nology (BCT).
products subcategory.
407.21 Specialized definitions. Subpart E—Dehydrated Potato Products
407.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 407.50 Applicability; description of the de-
practicable control technology currently hydrated potato products subcategory.
available. 407.51 Specialized definitions.
90
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00090 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.12
407.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart H—Canned and Miscellaneous
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Specialities Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently 407.80 Applicability; description of the
available. canned and miscellaneous specialties
407.53 [Reserved] subcategory.
407.54 Pretreatment standards for existing 407.81 Specialized definitions.
sources. 407.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
407.55 Standards of performance for new
attainable by the application of the best
sources.
practicable control technology currently
407.56 Pretreatment standards for new available.
sources. 407.83 [Reserved]
407.57 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 407.84 Pretreatment standards for existing
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources.
attainable by the application of the best 407.85 [Reserved]
conventional pollutant control tech- 407.86 Pretreatment standards for new
nology (BCT). sources.
407.87 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subpart F—Canned and Preserved Fruits resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subcategory attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
407.60 Applicability; description of the nology (BCT).
canned and preserved fruits subcategory. AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b)
407.61 Specialized definitions. and (c), 307(c) of the Federal Water Pollution
407.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Control Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311,
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317(c); 86
attainable by the application of the best Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567,
practicable control technology currently Pub. L. 95–217.
available.
SOURCE: 39 FR 10864, Mar. 21, 1974, unless
407.63 [Reserved]
otherwise noted.
407.64 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
407.65 [Reserved] Subpart A—Apple Juice
407.66 Pretreatment standards for new Subcategory
sources.
407.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- § 407.10 Applicability; description of
resenting the degree of effluent reduction the apple juice subcategory.
attainable by the application of the best The provisions of this subpart are ap-
conventional pollutant control tech- plicable to discharges resulting from
nology (BCT).
the processing of apples into apple
juice or apple cider. When a plant is
Subpart G—Canned and Preserved
subject to effluent limitations covering
Vegetables Subcategory
more than one subcategory, the plant
407.70 Applicability; description of the discharge limitation shall be set by
canned and preserved vegetables sub- proration limitations for each sub-
category. category based on the total raw mate-
407.71 Specialized definitions. rial covered by each subcategory.
407.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction § 407.11 Specialized definitions.
attainable by the application of the best
For the purpose of this subpart:
practicable control technology currently
available.
(a) Except as provided below, the gen-
407.73 [Reserved] eral definitions, abbreviations and
407.74 Pretreatment standards for existing methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
sources. part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
407.75 [Reserved]
407.76 Pretreatment standards for new
§ 407.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
sources.
representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica-
407.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- tion of the best practicable control
resenting the degree of effluent reduction technology currently available.
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- Except as provided in §§ 125.30
nology (BCT). through 125.32, any existing point
91
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00091 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
source subject to this subpart shall controlled by this section, which may
achieve the following effluent limita- be discharged by a new source subject
tions representing the degree of efflu- to the provisions of this subpart:
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control Effluent limitations
technology currently available (BPT):
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
Effluent limitations for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
Average of daily exceed—
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days Metric units (kilograms per
day shall not 1,000 kg of raw material
exceed—
92
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00092 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.26
93
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00093 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.27 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
treatment works must comply with 40 cation of the best practicable control
CFR part 403. technology currently available (BPT):
[60 FR 33938, June 29, 1995] Effluent limitations
94
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00094 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.42
95
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00095 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[39 FR 10864, Mar. 21, 1974, as amended at 41 § 407.52 Effluent limitations guidelines
FR 48737, Nov. 5, 1976] representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica-
§ 407.46 Pretreatment standards for tion of the best practicable control
new sources. technology currently available.
Any new source subject to this sub- Except as provided in §§ 125.30
part that introduces process waste- through 125.32, any existing point
water pollutants into a publicly owned source subject to this subpart shall
96
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.57
BOD5 ................................... 2.40 1.20 [39 FR 10864, Mar. 21, 1974, as amended at 41
TSS ...................................... 2.80 1.40 FR 48737, Nov. 5, 1976]
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. § 407.56 Pretreatment standards for
new sources.
[39 FR 10864, Mar. 21, 1974, as amended at 60
FR 33939, June 29, 1995] Any new source subject to this sub-
part that introduces process waste-
§ 407.53 [Reserved] water pollutants into a publicly owned
treatment works must comply with 40
§ 407.54 Pretreatment standards for CFR part 403.
existing sources.
Any existing source subject to this [60 FR 33939, June 29, 1995]
subpart that introduces process waste-
§ 407.57 Effluent limitations guidelines
water pollutants into a publicly owned representing the degree of effluent
treatment works must comply with 40 reduction attainable by the applica-
CFR part 403. In addition, the following tion of the best conventional pollut-
pretreatment standard establishes the ant control technology (BCT).
quantity or quality of pollutants or
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
pollutant properties controlled by this
through 125.32, any existing point
section which may be discharged to a
source subject to this subpart shall
publicly owned treatment works by a
achieve the following effluent limita-
point source subject to the provisions
tions representing the degree of efflu-
of this subpart.
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard cation of the best conventional pollut-
ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
pH ................................................... No limitation.
BOD5 .............................................. Do. itations shall be the same as those
TSS ................................................. Do. specified for conventional pollutants
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 407.52
[40 FR 6437, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60 of this subpart for the best practicable
FR 33939, June 29, 1995] control technology currently available
(BPT).
§ 407.55 Standards of performance for
new sources. [51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986]
97
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.60 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
98
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00098 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.62
sliced, diced, and any other cuts, nec- (t) The term strawberries shall mean
tar and concentrate but not dehy- the processing of strawberries into the
drated. following product styles: Canned and
(n) The term pickles, fresh shall mean frozen, whole, sliced, and pureed.
the processing of fresh cucumbers and (u) The term tomatoes shall mean the
other vegetables, all varieties, all sizes processing of tomatoes into canned,
from whole to relish, all styles, cured peeled, whole, stewed, and related piece
after packing. sizes; and processing of tomatoes into
(o) The term pickles processed shall the following products and product
mean the processing of pickles, cucum- styles: Canned, peeled and unpeeled
bers and other vegetables, all varieties, paste, concentrate, puree, sauce, juice,
sizes and types, made after fermenta- catsup and other similar formulated
tion and storage. items requiring various other pre-proc-
(p) The term pickles, salt stations shall essed food ingredients.
mean the handling and subsequent pre- (v) The term medium shall mean a
serving of cucumbers and other vegeta- point source that processes a total an-
bles at salting stations or tankyards, nual raw material production of fruits,
by salt and other chemical additions vegetables, specialties and other prod-
necessary to achieve proper fermenta- ucts that is between 1,816 kkg (2,000
tion for the packing of processed pickle tons) per year and 9,080 kkg (10,000
tons) per year.
products. Limitations include allow-
(w) The term large shall mean a point
ances for the discharge of spent brine,
source that processes a total annual
tank wash, tank soak, and cucumber
raw material production of fruits, vege-
wash waters. At locations where both
tables, specialties and other products
salt station and process pack oper-
that exceeds 9,080 kkg (10,000 tons) per
ations (§ 407.61(o)) occur, additive al-
year.
lowances shall be made for both of
(x) The term annual average shall
these sources in formulation of effluent
mean the maximum allowable dis-
limitations. The effluent limitations
charge of BOD5 or TSS as calculated by
are to be calculated based upon the
multiplying the total mass (kkg or 1000
total annual weight (1000 lb, kkg) of lb) of each raw commodity processed
raw product processed at each of the for the entire processing season or cal-
salt station and process pack oper- endar year by the applicable annual av-
ations. Allowances for contaminated erage limitation.
stormwater runoff should be considered (y) The terms maximum for any one
in NPDES permit formulation on a day and average of daily values for thirty
case-by-case basis. consecutive days shall be based on the
(q) The term pineapples shall mean daily average mass of material proc-
the processing of pineapple into the essed during the peak thirty consecu-
following product styles: Canned, tive day production period.
peeled, sliced, chunk, tidbit, diced,
crushed, and any other related piece [41 FR 16277, Apr. 16, 1976, as amended at 44
FR 22464, Apr. 16, 1979]
size, juice and concentrate. It also spe-
cifically includes the on-site produc- § 407.62 Effluent limitations guidelines
tion of by-products such as alcohol, representing the degree of effluent
sugar or animal feed. reduction attainable by the applica-
(r) The term plums shall mean the tion of the best practicable control
processing of plums into the following technology currently available.
product styles: Canned and frozen, pit- Except as provided in §§ 125.30
ted and unpitted, peeled and unpeeled, through 125.32, any existing point
blanched and unblanched, whole, source subject to this subpart shall
halved, and other piece size. achieve the following effluent limita-
(s) The term raisins shall mean the tions representing the degree of efflu-
production of raisins from the fol- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
lowing products: Dried grapes, all vari- cation of the best practicable control
eties, bleached and unbleached, which technology currently available (BPT):
have been cleaned and washed prior to (a) The following limitations estab-
packaging. lish the quantity of BOD5 controlled by
99
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00099 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.62 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
this section, which may be discharged son shall meet the annual average,
by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing maximum thirty day average, and
point source subject to the provisions maximum day TSS limitations. Fruit
of this subpart after application of the processing plants employing long term
best practicable control technology waste stabilization, where all or a por-
currently available. Any fruit proc- tion of the process waste water dis-
essing plant which continuously or charge is stored for the entire proc-
intermittently discharges process essing season and released at a con-
waste water during the processing sea- trolled rate with state approval, shall
son shall meet the annual average,
meet only the annual average TSS lim-
maximum thirty day average, and
itations.
maximum day BOD5 limitations. Fruit
[Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb
processing plants employing long term of raw material]
waste stabilization, where all or a por-
tion of the process waste water dis- TSS effluent limitations
charge is stored for the entire proc- Average of
essing season and released at a con- Commodity (fruits) Max- daily values Annual
imum for for 30 con- average
trolled rate with State approval, shall any 1 secutive days shall not
meet only the annual average BOD5 day shall not exceed—
exceed—
limitations.
[Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb Apricots .................... 5.36 3.74 2.33
of raw material] Caneberries .............. 1.38 0.95 0.58
Cherries:
BOD5 effluent limitations
Brined ................... 5.18 3.68 2.38
Average of Sour ...................... 3.20 2.30 1.52
Max- daily values Annual Sweet .................... 2.01 1.43 0.92
Commodity (fruits) imum for for 30 con- average
any 1 secutive days shall not Cranberries ............... 3.06 2.14 1.34
day shall not exceed— Dried fruit .................. 3.34 2.34 1.48
exceed— Grape juice:
Canning ................ 1.99 1.44 0.96
Apricots .................... 3.00 1.81 1.26
Caneberries .............. 0.77 0.46 0.32 Pressing ................ 0.40 0.29 0.18
Cherries: Olives ....................... 9.79 6.92 4.44
Brined ................... 2.87 1.78 1.28 Peaches ................... 2.72 1.93 1.26
Sour ...................... 1.77 1.11 0.81 Pears ........................ 3.21 2.32 1.55
Sweet .................... 1.12 0.69 0.49 Pickles:
Cranberries ............... 1.71 1.03 0.73 Fresh pack ............ 2.19 1.54 0.99
Dried fruit .................. 1.86 1.13 0.80
Process pack ........ 2.63 1.91 1.28
Grape juice:
Canning ................ 1.10 0.69 0.51 Salt stations ...... 0.42 0.33 0.25
Pressing ................ 0.22 0.14 0.10 Pineapples ................ 3.85 2.76 1.81
Olives ....................... 5.44 3.34 2.39 Plums ....................... 1.24 0.87 0.54
Peaches ................... 1.51 0.93 0.67 Raisins ...................... 0.78 0.57 0.39
Pears ........................ 1.77 1.12 0.83 Strawberries ............. 3.19 2.20 1.35
Pickles: Tomatoes ................. 2.15 1.48 0.90
Fresh pack ............ 1.22 0.75 0.53
Process pack ........ 1.45 0.92 0.68
Salt stations ...... 0.25 0.18 0.15 (c) The following limitations estab-
Pineapples ................ 2.13 1.33 0.96 lish the quality of pH controlled by
Plums ....................... 0.69 0.42 0.29
Raisins ...................... 0.43 0.28 0.21 this section, which may be discharged
Strawberries ............. 1.79 1.06 0.74 by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing
Tomatoes ................. 1.21 0.71 0.94
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the
(b) The following limitations estab-
lish the quantity of TSS controlled by best practicable control technology
this section, which may be discharged currently available.
by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the pH ................................... At all times within the range 6.0 to
9.5.
best practicable control technology
currently available. Any fruit proc-
essing plant which continuously or [41 FR 16277, Apr. 16, 1976, as amended at 44
intermittently discharges process FR 22464, Apr. 16, 1979; 60 FR 33939, June 29,
waste water during the processing sea- 1995]
100
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00100 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.71
101
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00101 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.71 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
crinkle cut, julienne, shoestrings, (n) The term squash shall include the
chunks, chips and other irregular cuts, processing of pumpkin and squash into
and juices but not dehydrated carrots. canned and frozen styles.
(e) The term corn, canned shall mean (o) The term sauerkraut cutting shall
the processing of corn into the fol- mean the trimming, cutting, and sub-
lowing product styles: Canned, yellow sequent preparatory handling of cab-
and white, whole kernel, cream style, bage necessary for and including
and on-the-cob. brining and fermentation, and subse-
(f) The term corn, frozen shall mean quent tank soaking.
the processing of corn into the fol- (p) The term sauerkraut canning shall
lowing product styles: Frozen, yellow mean the draining and subsequent fill-
and white, whole kernel and whole cob. ing and canning of fermented cabbage
(g) The term dehydrated onions and and juice.
garlic shall mean the processing of de- (q) The term snap beans shall mean
hydrated onions and garlic into the fol- the processing of snap beans into the
lowing product styles: Air, vacuum, following product styles: Canned and
and freeze dried, all varieties, diced, frozen green, Italian, wax, string, bush,
strips, and other piece sizes ranging and other related varieties, whole,
from large sliced to powder but not in- French, fancy, Extra Standard, Stand-
cluding green onions, chives, or leeks. ard, and other cuts.
(h) The term dehydrated vegetables (r) The term spinach shall mean the
shall mean the processing of dehy- processing of spinach and leafy greens
drated vegetables in the following into the following product styles:
product styles: Air, vacuum and freeze Canned or frozen, whole leaf, chopped,
dried, blanched and unblanched, peeled and other related cuts.
and unpeeled, beets, bell peppers, cab- (s) The term potatoes shall mean the
bage, carrots, celery, chili pepper, processing of sweet potatoes into the
horseradish, turnips, parsnips, parsley, following product styles: Canned,
asparagus, tomatoes, green beans, peeled, solid, syrup, and vacuum
corn, spinach, green onion tops, chives, packed. The following white potato
leeks, whole, diced, and any other piece product styles are also included:
size ranging from sliced to powder. Canned, peeled, white, all varieties,
(i) The term dry beans shall mean the whole and sliced.
production of canned pinto, kidney, (t) The term medium shall mean a
navy, great northern, red, pink or re- point source that processes a total an-
lated type, with and without formu- nual raw material production of fruits,
lated sauces, meats and gravies. vegetables, specialties and other prod-
(j) The term lima beans shall mean ucts that is between 1,816 kkg (2,000
the processing of lima beans into the tons) per year and 9,080 kkg (10,000
following product styles: Canned and tons) per year.
frozen, green and white, all varieties (u) The term large shall mean a point
and sizes. source that processes a total annual
(k) The term mushrooms shall mean raw material production of fruits, vege-
the processing of mushrooms into the tables, specialties and other products
following product styles: Canned, fro- that exceeds 9,080 kkg (10,000 tons) per
zen, dehydrated, all varieties, shapes year.
and sizes. (v) The term annual average shall
(l) The term canned onions shall mean mean the maximum allowable dis-
the processing of onions into the fol- charge of BOD5 or TSS as calculated by
lowing product styles: Canned, frozen, multiplying the total mass (kkg or 1000
and fried (canned), peeled, whole, lb) of each raw commodity processed
sliced, and any other piece size but not for the entire processing season or cal-
including frozen, battered onion rings endar year by the applicable annual av-
or dehydrated onions. erage limitation.
(m) The term peas shall mean the (w) The terms maximum for any one
processing of peas into the following day and average of daily values for thirty
product styles: Canned and frozen, all consecutive days shall be based on the
varieties and sizes, whole. daily average mass of raw material
102
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00102 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.72
processed during the peak thirty con- [Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb
of raw material]
secutive day production period.
BOD5 effluent limitations
§ 407.72 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent Average of
Commodity Max- daily values Annual
reduction attainable by the applica- (vegetables) imum for for 30 con- average
tion of the best practicable control any 1 secutive days shall not
technology currently available. day shall not exceed—
exceed—
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
Dehydrated vegeta-
through 125.32, any existing point bles ....................... 2.98 1.76 1.21
source subject to this subpart shall Dry beans ................. 2.50 1.51 1.07
achieve the following effluent limita- Lima beans ............... 3.68 2.19 1.51
Mushrooms ............... 3.01 1.78 1.22
tions representing the degree of efflu- Onions (canned) ....... 3.09 1.83 1.25
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Peas ......................... 2.42 1.50 1.08
cation of the best practicable control Sauerkraut:
technology currently available (BPT): Canning ................ 0.50 0.30 0.21
Cutting .................. 0.08 0.05 0.04
(a) The following limitations estab- Snap beans .............. 1.51 0.87 0.58
lish the quantity of BOD5 controlled by Spinach .................... 2.37 1.36 0.91
this section, which may be discharged Squash ..................... 0.90 0.59 0.46
Potatoes ................... 0.90 0.66 0.55
by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing
point source subject to the provisions
(b) The following limitations estab-
of this subpart after application of the
lish the quantity of TSS controlled by
best practicable control technology
the section, which may be discharged
currently available. Any vegetable
by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing
processing plant which continuously or
point source subject to the provisions
intermittently discharges process
of this subpart after application of the
waste water during the processing sea-
best practicable control technology
son shall meet the annual average,
currently available. Any vegetable
maximum thirty day average, and
processing plant which continuously or
maximum day BOD5 limitations. Vege-
intermittently discharges process
table processing plants employing long
waste water during the processing sea-
term waste stabilization, where all or a
son shall meet the annual average,
portion of the process waste water dis-
maximum thirty day average, and
charge is stored for the entire proc-
maximum day TSS limitations. Vege-
essing season and released at a con-
table processing plants employing long
trolled rate with State approval, shall
term waste stabilization, where all or a
meet only the annual average BOD5
portion of the process waste water dis-
limitations. The effluent limitations
charge is stored for the entire proc-
do not apply to single-commodity 100
essing season and released at a con-
percent canned corn processing plants
trolled rate with state approval, shall
of all sizes, and multi-commodity 100
meet only the annual average TSS lim-
percent frozen vegetable processing
itations. The effluent limitations do
plants with total annual raw material
not apply to single-commodity 100 per-
production less than 7,264 kkg (8,000
cent canned corn processing plants of
tons) per year.
all sizes, and multi-commodity 100 per-
[Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb
of raw material] cent frozen vegetable processing plants
with total annual raw material produc-
BOD5 effluent limitations tion less than 7,264 kkg (8,000 tons) per
Average of year.
Commodity Max- daily values Annual [Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb
(vegetables) imum for for 30 con- average of raw material]
any 1 secutive days shall not
day shall not exceed—
exceed— TSS effluent limitations
103
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00103 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.73 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[Metric units, kg/kkg of raw material; English units, lb/1,000 lb
of raw material] § 407.73 [Reserved]
104
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00104 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.81
achieve the following effluent limita- serts and snacks using fresh, pre-proc-
tions representing the degree of efflu- essed, or any combination of these and
ent reduction attainable by the appli- other food ingredients necessary for
cation of the best conventional pollut- the production of infant foods.
ant control technology (BCT): The lim- (d) The term chips, potato shall mean
itations shall be the same as those the processing of fried chips, made
specified for conventional pollutants from fresh or stored white potatoes, all
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 407.72 varieties. In terms of finished potato
of this subpart for the best practicable chips, 1 kg (lb) of finished product is
control technology currently available equivalent to 4 kg (lb) of raw material.
(BPT). (e) The term chips, corn shall mean
[51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986] the processing of fried corn, made by
soaking, rinsing, milling and extruding
Subpart H—Canned and Miscella- into a fryer without toasting. In terms
of finished corn chips, 1 kg (lb) of fin-
neous Specialties ished product is equivalent to 0.9 kg
Subcategory (lb) of raw material.
(f) The term chips, tortilla shall mean
SOURCE: 41 FR 16284, Apr. 16, 1976, unless the processing of fried corn, made by
otherwise noted.
soaking, rinsing, milling, rolling into
§ 407.80 Applicability; description of sheets, toasting and frying. In terms of
the canned and miscellaneous spe- finished tortilla chips, 1 kg (lb) of fin-
cialties subcategory. ished product is equivalent to 0.9 kg
The provisions of this subpart are ap- (lb) of raw material.
plicable to discharges resulting from (g) The term ethnic foods shall mean
the processing of the following spe- the production of canned and frozen
cialty products: Added ingredients; Chinese and Mexican specialties uti-
baby food; corn, potato, and tortilla lizing fresh and pre-processed bean
chips; ethnic foods; jams and jellies; sprouts, bamboo shoots, water chest-
mayonnaise and dressings; soups; and nuts, celery, cactus, tomatoes, and
tomato-starch-cheese canned special- other similar vegetables necessary for
ties. When a plant is subject to effluent the production of the various char-
limitations covering more than one acteristic product styles.
commodity or subcategory, the plant (h) The term jams and jellies shall in-
discharge limitations shall be set by clude the production of jams, jellies
proration of limitations for each sub- and preserves defined as follows: The
category or commodity based on the combination of fruit and fruit con-
total production covered by each com- centrate, sugar, pectin, and other addi-
modity or subcategory. tives in an acidic medium resulting in
a gelatinized and thickened finished
§ 407.81 Specialized definitions. product.
For the purpose of this subpart: (i) The term mayonnaise and salad
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- dressings shall be defined as the
eral definitions, abbreviations and emulsified and non-emulsified semi-
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR solid food prepared from the combining
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. of edible vegetable oil with acidifying,
(b) The term added ingredients shall and egg yolk containing ingredients, or
mean the prepared sauces (prepared gum and starch combinations to which
from items such as dairy products, certain colorings, spices, and
starches, sugar, tomato sauce and con- flavorings have been added.
centrate, spices, and other related (j) The term soups shall mean the
preprocessed ingredients) which are combination of various fresh and pre-
added during the canning and freezing processed meats, fish, dairy products,
of fruits and vegetables. eggs, flours, starches, vegetables,
(c) The term baby foods shall mean spices, and other similar raw ingredi-
the processing of canned fresh fruits ents into a variety of finished mixes
and vegetables, meats, eggs, fruit and styles but not including dehy-
juices, cereal, formulated entrees, des- drated soups.
105
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00105 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 407.82 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
106
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00106 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 407.87
(kg) of pollutant per 1000 pounds (lb) or Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
kilograms (kkg) of raw ingredients.
BOD5 .............................................. No limitation.
[Metric units, kg/kkg of final product; English units, lb/1,000 lb
of final product] TSS ................................................. Do.
Oil and grease ................................ Do.
TSS effluent limitations
Added ingredients .... 0.00 0.00 0.00 § 407.86 Pretreatment standards for
Baby food ................. 2.23 1.55 0.95 new sources.
Chips:
Corn ...................... 2.90 2.17 1.53 Any new source subject to this sub-
Potato ................... 6.25 4.49 2.97
Tortilla ................... 4.34 3.11 2.04
part that introduces process waste-
Ethnic foods ............. 4.23 2.91 1.73 water pollutants into a publicly owned
Jams/jellies ............... 0.76 0.54 0.36 treatment works must comply with 40
Mayonnaise and
dressings .............. 0.67 0.49 0.33 CFR part 403. In addition, the following
Soups ....................... 7.38 5.09 3.10 pretreatment standard establishes the
Tomato-starch- quantity or quality of pollutants or
cheese canned
specialties ............. 3.31 2.23 1.30 pollutant properties controlled by this
section which may be discharged to a
(c) The following limitations estab- publicly owned treatment works by a
lish the quality of pH controlled by new point source subject to the provi-
this section, which may be discharged sions of this subpart.
by a ‘‘medium’’ or ‘‘large’’ existing
point source subject to the provisions Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
of this subpart after application of the BOD5 .............................................. No limitation.
best practicable control technology TSS ................................................. Do.
currently available. Oil and grease ................................ Do.
107
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00107 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 408 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
108
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 408
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.83 [Reserved]
nology (BCT). 408.84 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart F—Non-Remote Alaskan Whole 408.85 Standards of performance for new
Crab and Crab Section Processing sources.
Subcategory 408.86 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
408.60 Applicability; description of the non-
remote Alaskan whole crab and crab sec- 408.87 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
tion processing subcategory. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.61 Specialized definitions. attainable by the application of the best
408.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- conventional pollutant control tech-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction nology (BCT).
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently Subpart I—Non-Remote Alaskan Shrimp
available. Processing Subcategory
408.63 [Reserved]
408.64 Pretreatment standards for existing 408.90 Applicability; description of the non-
sources. remote Alaskan shrimp processing sub-
408.65 Standards of performance for new category.
sources. 408.91 Specialized definitions.
408.66 Pretreatment standards for new 408.92 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
practicable control technology currently
attainable by the application of the best
available.
conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT). 408.93 [Reserved]
408.94 Pretreatment standards for existing
Subpart G—Remote Alaskan Whole Crab sources.
and Crab Section Processing Subcategory 408.95 Standards of performance for new
sources.
408.70 Applicability; description of the re- 408.96 Pretreatment standards for new
mote Alaskan whole crab and crab sec- sources.
tion processing subcategory. 408.97 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.71 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-
practicable control technology currently nology (BCT).
available.
408.73 [Reserved] Subpart J—Remote Alaskan Shrimp
408.74 Pretreatment standards for existing Processing Subcategory
sources.
408.75 Standards of performance for new 408.100 Applicability; description of the re-
sources. mote Alaskan shrimp processing sub-
408.76 Pretreatment standards for new category.
sources. 408.101 Specialized definitions.
408.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 408.102 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- practicable control technology currently
nology (BCT). available.
408.103 [Reserved]
Subpart H—Dungeness and Tanner Crab
408.104 Pretreatment standards for existing
Processing in the Contiguous States sources.
Subcategory 408.105 Standards of performance for new
408.80 Applicability; description of the dun- sources.
geness and tanner crab processing in the 408.106 Pretreatment standards for new
contiguous States subcategory. sources.
408.81 Specialized definitions. 408.107 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best conventional pollutant control tech-
practicable control technology currently nology (BCT).
available.
109
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 408 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
110
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 408
practicable control technology currently Subpart S—West Coast Mechanized
available. Salmon Processing Subcategory
408.163 [Reserved]
408.164 Pretreatment standards for existing 408.190 Applicability; description of the
sources. West Coast mechanized salmon proc-
408.165 Standards of performance for new essing subcategory.
sources. 408.191 Specialized definitions.
408.192 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.166 Pretreatment standards for new
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources.
attainable by the application of the best
408.167 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction available.
attainable by the application of the best 408.193 [Reserved]
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.194 Pretreatment standards for existing
nology. sources.
408.195 Standards of performance for new
Subpart Q—Alaskan Mechanized Salmon sources.
Processing Subcategory 408.196 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
408.170 Applicability; description of the 408.197 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Alaskan mechanized salmon processing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
subcategory. attainable by the application of the best
408.171 Specialized definitions. conventional pollutant control tech-
408.172 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- nology (BCT).
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best Subpart T—Alaskan Bottom Fish Processing
practicable control technology currently Subcategory
available.
408.173 [Reserved] 408.200 Applicability; description of the
Alaskan bottom fish processing sub-
408.174 Pretreatment standards for existing
category.
sources.
408.201 Specialized definitions.
408.175 Standards of performance for new 408.202 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.176 Pretreatment standards for new attainable by the application of the best
sources. practicable control technology currently
408.177 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- available.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 408.203 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best 408.204 Pretreatment standards for existing
conventional pollutant control tech- sources.
nology (BCT). 408.205 Standards of performance for new
sources.
Subpart R—West Coast Hand-Butchered 408.206 Pretreatment standards for new
Salmon Processing Subcategory sources.
408.207 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.180 Applicability; description of the resenting the degree of effluent reduction
West Coast hand-butchered salmon proc- attainable by the application of the best
essing subcategory. conventional pollutant control tech-
408.181 Specialized definitions. nology.
408.182 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subpart U—Non-Alaskan Conventional
attainable by the application of the best Bottom Fish Processing Subcategory
practicable control technology currently
available. 408.210 Applicability; description of the non-
Alaskan conventional bottom fish proc-
408.183 [Reserved]
essing subcategory.
408.184 Pretreatment standards for existing 408.211 Specialized definitions.
sources. 408.212 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.185 Standards of performance for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
408.186 Pretreatment standards for new practicable control technology currently
sources. available.
408.187 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 408.213 [Reserved]
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 408.214 Pretreatment standards for existing
attainable by the application of the best sources.
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.215 Standards of performance for new
nology (BCT). sources.
111
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 408 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
408.216 Pretreatment standards for new attainable by the application of the best
sources. practicable control technology currently
408.217 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- available.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 408.243 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best 408.244 Pretreatment standards for existing
conventional pollutant control tech- sources.
nology (BCT). 408.245 Standards of performance for new
sources.
Subpart V—Non-Alaskan Mechanized 408.246 Pretreatment standards for new
Bottom Fish Processing Subcategory sources.
408.247 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.220 Applicability; description of the non-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Alaskan mechanized bottom fish proc-
attainable by the application of the best
essing subcategory.
conventional pollutant control tech-
408.221 Specialized definitions.
408.222 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- nology (BCT).
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best Subpart Y—Pacific Coast Hand-Shucked
practicable control technology currently Oyster Processing Subcategory
available.
408.223 [Reserved] 408.250 Applicability; description of the Pa-
408.224 Pretreatment standards for existing cific Coast hand-shucked oyster proc-
sources. essing subcategory.
408.225 Standards of performance for new 408.251 Specialized definitions.
sources. 408.252 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.226 Pretreatment standards for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
408.227 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction available.
attainable by the application of the best 408.253 [Reserved]
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.254 Pretreatment standards for existing
nology (BCT). sources.
408.255 Standards of performance for new
Subpart W—Hand-Shucked Clam sources.
Processing Subcategory 408.256 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
408.230 Applicability; description of the 408.257 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
hand-shucked clam processing sub- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
category. attainable by the application of the best
408.231 Specialized definitions. conventional pollutant control tech-
408.232 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- nology.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best Subpart Z—Atlantic and Gulf Coast Hand-
practicable control technology currently
available.
Shucked Oyster Processing Subcategory
408.233 [Reserved] 408.260 Applicability; description of the At-
408.234 Pretreatment standards for existing lantic and Gulf Coast hand-shucked oys-
sources. ter processing subcategory.
408.235 Standards of performance for new
408.261 Specialized definitions.
sources.
408.262 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.236 Pretreatment standards for new
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources.
attainable by the application of the best
408.237 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
available.
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.263 [Reserved]
nology (BCT). 408.264 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart X—Mechanized Clam Processing 408.265 Standards of performance for new
Subcategory sources.
408.266 Pretreatment standards for new
408.240 Applicability; description of the sources.
mechanized clam processing sub- 408.267 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
category. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.241 Specialized definitions. attainable by the application of the best
408.242 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- conventional pollutant control tech-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction nology.
112
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 408
Subpart AA—Steamed and Canned Oyster 408.297 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Processing Subcategory resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
408.270 Applicability; description of the conventional pollutant control tech-
steamed and canned oyster processing nology.
subcategory.
408.271 Specialized definitions. Subpart AD—Non-Alaskan Scallop
408.272 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Processing Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 408.300 Applicability; description of the non-
practicable control technology currently Alaskan scallop processing subcategory.
available. 408.301 Specialized definitions.
408.273 [Reserved] 408.302 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.274 Pretreatment standards for existing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
408.275 Standards of performance for new practicable control technology currently
sources. available.
408.276 Pretreatment standards for new 408.303 [Reserved]
sources. 408.304 Pretreatment standards for existing
408.277 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 408.305 Standards of performance for new
attainable by the application of the best sources.
conventional pollutant control tech- 408.306 Pretreatment standards for new
nology (BCT). sources.
408.307 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subpart AB—Sardine Processing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subcategory attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
408.280 Applicability; description of the sar- nology.
dine processing subcategory.
408.281 Specialized definitions. Subpart AE—Alaskan Herring Fillet
408.282 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Processing Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 408.310 Applicability; description of the
practicable control technology currently Alaskan herring fillet processing sub-
available. category.
408.283 [Reserved] 408.311 Specialized definitions.
408.284 Pretreatment standards for existing 408.312 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
408.285 Standards of performance for new attainable by the application of the best
sources. practicable control technology currently
408.286 Pretreatment standards for new available.
sources. 408.313 [Reserved]
408.287 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 408.314 Pretreatment standards for existing
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources.
attainable by the application of the best 408.315 Standards of performance for new
conventional pollutant control tech- sources.
nology (BCT). 408.316 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
Subpart AC—Alaskan Scallop Processing 408.317 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subcategory resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
408.290 Applicability; description of the conventional pollutant control tech-
Alaskan scallop processing subcategory. nology (BCT).
408.291 Specialized definitions.
408.292 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart AF—Non-Alaskan Herring Fillet
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Processing Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently 408.320 Applicability; description of the non-
available. Alaskan herring fillet processing sub-
408.293 [Reserved] category.
408.294 Pretreatment standards for existing 408.321 Specialized definitions.
sources. 408.322 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
408.295 Standards of performance for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
408.296 Pretreatment standards for new practicable control technology currently
sources. available.
113
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00113 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
408.323 [Reserved] (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
408.324 Pretreatment standards for existing eral definitions, abbreviations and
sources. methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
408.325 Standards of performance for new
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
sources.
408.326 Pretreatment standards for new
(b) The term oil and grease shall mean
sources. those components of a waste water
408.327 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- amenable to measurement by the
resenting the degree of effluent reduction method described in Methods for Chem-
attainable by the application of the best ical Analysis of Water and Wastes, 1971,
conventional pollutant control tech- Environmental Protection Agency, An-
nology (BCT). alytical Quality Control Laboratory,
page 217.
Subpart AG—Abalone Processing (c) The term seafood shall mean the
Subcategory raw material, including freshwater and
408.330 Applicability; description of the aba- saltwater fish and shellfish, to be proc-
lone processing subcategory. essed, in the form in which it is re-
408.331 Specialized definitions. ceived at the processing plant.
408.332 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction § 408.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
attainable by the application of the best representing the degree of effluent
practicable control technology currently reduction attainable by the applica-
available. tion of the best practicable control
408.333 [Reserved] technology currently available.
408.334 Pretreatment standards for existing Except as provided in §§ 125.30
sources.
408.335 Standards of performance for new
through 125.32, any existing point
sources. source subject to this subpart shall
408.336 Pretreatment standards for new achieve the following effluent limita-
sources. tions representing the degree of efflu-
408.337 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction cation of the best practicable control
attainable by the application of the best technology currently available (BPT):
conventional pollutant control tech-
nology. Effluent limitations
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b) Average of daily
and (c), 307(c), of the Federal Water Pollu- Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
tion Control Act, as amended; 33 U.S.C. 1251, day shall not
1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317(c); exceed—
86 Stat. 816 et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat.
Metric units (kg/kkg of
1567, Pub. L. 95–217.
seafood)
SOURCE: 39 FR 23140, June 26, 1974, unless
otherwise noted. TSS ...................................... 28 9.2
Oil and grease ..................... 10 3.4
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Subpart A—Farm-Raised Catfish
Processing Subcategory English units (lb/1,000 lb of
seafood)
§ 408.10 Applicability; description of
TSS ...................................... 28 9.2
the farm-raised catfish processing Oil and grease ..................... 10 3.4
subcategory. pH ........................................ (1) (1)
The provisions of this subpart are ap- 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
plicable to discharges resulting from
the processing of farm-raised catfish by [39 FR 23140, June 26, 1974, as amended at 60
existing facilities which process more FR 33940, June 29, 1995]
than 1362 kg (3000 lbs) of raw material
§ 408.13 [Reserved]
per day on any day during a calendar
year and all new sources. § 408.14 Pretreatment standards for
[40 FR 55780, Dec. 1, 1975] existing sources.
Any existing source subject to this
§ 408.11 Specialized definitions. subpart that introduces process waste-
For the purpose of this subpart: water pollutants into a publicly owned
114
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00114 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.21
115
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.22 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
saltwater fish and shellfish, to be proc- [40 FR 6438, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60
essed, in the form in which it is re- FR 33940, June 29, 1995]
ceived at the processing plant.
§ 408.25 Standards of performance for
§ 408.22 Effluent limitations guidelines new sources.
representing the degree of effluent The following standards of perform-
reduction attainable by the applica- ance establish the quantity or quality
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available. of pollutants or pollutant properties,
controlled by this section, which may
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 be discharged by a new source subject
through 125.32, any existing point to the provisions of this subpart:
source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limita- Effluent limitations
tions representing the degree of efflu- Average of daily
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
cation of the best practicable control day shall not
technology currently available (BPT): exceed—
116
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.35
117
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00117 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.36 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Any new source subject to this sub- For the purpose of this subpart:
part that introduces process waste- (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
water pollutants into a publicly owned eral definitions, abbreviations and
treatment works must comply with 40 methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
CFR part 403. part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term oil and grease shall mean
[60 FR 33941, June 29, 1995] those components of a waste water
amenable to measurement by the
§ 408.37 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent method described in Methods for Chem-
reduction attainable by the applica- ical Analysis of Water and Wastes, 1971,
tion of the best conventional pollut- Environmental Protection Agency, An-
ant control technology (BCT). alytical Quality Control Laboratory,
page 217.
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point (c) The term seafood shall mean the
source subject to this subpart shall raw material, including freshwater and
achieve the following effluent limita- saltwater fish and shellfish, to be proc-
tions representing the degree of efflu- essed, in the form in which it is re-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- ceived at the processing plant.
cation of the best conventional pollut- § 408.42 Effluent limitations guidelines
ant control technology (BCT): The lim- representing the degree of effluent
itations shall be the same as those reduction attainable by the applica-
specified for conventional pollutants tion of the best practicable control
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 408.32 technology currently available.
of this subpart for the best practicable Except as provided in §§ 125.30
control technology currently available through 125.32, any existing point
(BPT). source subject to this subpart shall
[51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986] achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control
technology currently available (BPT):
118
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00118 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.47
119
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00119 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.50 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
120
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00120 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.65
Average of daily
Subpart F—Non-Remote Alaskan Effluent characteristic Maximum
for any 1
values for 30
consecutive days
Whole Crab and Crab Section day shall not
exceed—
Processing Subcategory
Metric units (kg/kkg of
§ 408.60 Applicability; description of seafood)
the non-remote Alaskan whole crab
and crab section processing sub- TSS ...................................... 12 12
category. Oil and grease ..................... 1.3 0.42
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to discharges resulting from English units (lb/1,000 lb of
the processing, in non-remote Alaska, seafood)
of dungeness, tanner and king whole
crab and crab sections. The effluent TSS ...................................... 12 3.9
Oil and grease ..................... 1.3 0.42
limitations contained in this subpart F
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
are applicable to facilities located in
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
population or processing centers in-
cluding but not limited to Anchorage,
Cordova, Juneau, Ketchikan, Kodiak, [39 FR 23140, June 26, 1974, as amended at 60
FR 33941, June 29, 1995]
and Petersburg.
[40 FR 55780, Dec. 1, 1975] § 408.63 [Reserved]
§ 408.62 Effluent limitations guidelines [40 FR 6438, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60
representing the degree of effluent FR 33941, June 29, 1995]
reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control § 408.65 Standards of performance for
technology currently available. new sources.
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 The following standards of perform-
through 125.32, any existing point ance establish the quantity or quality
source subject to this subpart shall of pollutants or pollutant properties,
achieve the following effluent limita- controlled by this section, which may
tions representing the degree of efflu- be discharged by a new source subject
ent reduction attainable by the appli- to the provisions of this subpart:
121
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00121 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.66 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
122
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00122 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.82
123
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00123 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.83 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
124
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00124 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.95
125
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00125 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.96 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
126
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00126 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.112
127
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00127 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.113 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
128
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00128 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.125
129
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00129 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.126 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
130
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00130 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.137
131
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.140 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
132
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.152
133
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.153 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
under § 408.152(a) shall meet the fol- be discharged by a new source subject
lowing limitations: to the provisions of this subpart:
Effluent limitations Effluent limitations
Average of daily Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not day shall not
exceed— exceed—
134
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.164
achieve the following effluent limita- neau, Ketchikan, Kodiak, and Peters-
tions representing the degree of efflu- burg shall meet the following limita-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- tions:
cation of the best conventional pollut-
ant control technology (BCT): The lim- Effluent limitations
itations shall be the same as those Average of daily
specified for conventional pollutants Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 408.152 day shall not
of this subpart for the best practicable exceed—
control technology currently available Metric units (kilograms per
(BPT). 1,000 kg of seafood)
[51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986]
TSS ...................................... 2.6 1.6
Oil and grease ..................... 0.31 0.19
Subpart P—Alaskan Hand-Butch- pH ........................................ (1) (1)
ered Salmon Processing
Subcategory English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of seafood)
135
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00135 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.165 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
136
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00136 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.175
saltwater fish and shellfish, to be proc- water pollutants into a publicly owned
essed, in the form in which it is re- treatment works must comply with 40
ceived at the processing plant. CFR part 403. In addition, the following
pretreatment standard establishes the
§ 408.172 Effluent limitations guide- quantity or quality of pollutants or
lines representing the degree of ef- pollutant properties controlled by this
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable section which may be discharged to a
control technology currently avail- publicly owned treatment works by a
able. point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart.
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limita- BOD5 .............................................. No limitation.
TSS ................................................. Do.
tions representing the degree of efflu-
pH ................................................... Do.
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Oil and grease ................................ Do.
cation of the best practicable control
technology currently available (BPT):
(a) Any mechanized salmon proc- [40 FR 55783, Dec. 1, 1975, as amended at 60
FR 33944, June 29, 1995]
essing facility located in population or
processing centers including but not § 408.175 Standards of performance for
limited to Anchorage, Cordova, Ju- new sources.
neau, Ketchikan, Kodiak, and Peters-
burg shall meet the following limita- (a) The following standards of per-
tions: formance establish the quantity or
quality of pollutants or pollutant prop-
Effluent limitations erties, controlled by this section,
Average of daily which may be discharged by a new
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 source subject to the provisions of this
for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not subpart:
exceed— (1) Any mechanized salmon proc-
Metric units (kilograms per essing facility located in population or
1,000 kg of seafood) processing centers including but not
limited to Anchorage, Cordova, Ju-
TSS ...................................... 44 26 neau, Ketchikan, Kodiak, and Peters-
Oil and grease ..................... 29 11
pH ........................................ (1) (1) burg shall meet the following limita-
tions:
English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of seafood) Effluent limitations
Average of daily
TSS ...................................... 44 26 Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
Oil and grease ..................... 29 11 for any 1 consecutive days
pH ........................................ (1) (1) day shall not
1 Within
exceed—
the range 6.0 to 9.0.
Metric units (kilograms per
(b) Any mechanized salmon proc- 1,000 kg of seafood)
essing facility not covered under
§ 408.172(a) shall meet the following TSS ...................................... 42 25
limitations: No pollutants may be dis- Oil and grease ..................... 28 10
charged which exceed 1.27 cm (0.5 inch) pH ........................................ (1) (1)
in any dimension.
English units (pounds per
[40 FR 55783, Dec. 1, 1975, as amended at 41 1,000 lb of seafood)
FR 31821, July 30, 1976; 60 FR 33944, June 29,
1995] TSS ...................................... 42 25
Oil and grease ..................... 28 10
§ 408.173 [Reserved] pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
§ 408.174 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources. (2) Any mechanized salmon proc-
Any existing source subject to this essing facility not covered under
subpart that introduces process waste- § 408.175(a)(1) shall meet the following
137
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00137 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.176 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
138
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00138 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.190
139
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00139 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.191 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
140
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00140 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.204
141
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00141 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.205 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
142
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00142 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.215
143
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00143 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.216 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
controlled by this section, which may ent reduction attainable by the appli-
be discharged by a new source subject cation of the best conventional pollut-
to the provisions of this subpart: ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
itations shall be the same as those
Effluent limitations
specified for conventional pollutants
Average of daily (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 408.212
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days of this subpart for the best practicable
day shall not control technology currently available
exceed—
(BPT).
Metric units (kilograms per
[51 FR 24997, July 9, 1986]
1,000 kg of seafood)
144
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00144 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.227
145
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00145 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.230 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
146
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00146 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.242
147
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00147 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.243 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
148
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00148 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.255
149
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00149 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.256 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
150
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00150 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.266
151
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00151 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.267 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
§ 408.267 Effluent limitations guide- (b) The term product shall mean the
lines representing the degree of ef- weight of the oyster meat after shuck-
fluent reduction attainable by the ing.
application of the best conventional
pollutant control technology. § 408.272 Effluent limitations guide-
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the
through 125.32, the following limita- application of the best practicable
tions establish the quantity or quality control technology currently avail-
of pollutants or pollutant properties, able.
controlled by this section, which may
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
be discharged by a point source subject
through 125.32, any existing point
to the provisions of this subpart after
source subject to this subpart shall
application of the best conventional
achieve the following effluent limita-
pollutant control technology:
tions representing the degree of efflu-
Effluent limitations ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Average of
cation of the best practicable control
daily values technology currently available (BPT):
Effluent characteristic Maximum for thirty
for any 1 consecutive Effluent limitations
day days shall
not Average of daily
exceed— Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
Metric units (kilograms per day shall not
1,000 kg of product) exceed—
152
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00152 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.281
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
BOD5 ................................... 67 17
Subpart AB—Sardine Processing
TSS ...................................... 56 39 Subcategory
Oil and grease ..................... 0.84 0.42
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
SOURCE: 40 FR 55795, Dec. 1, 1975, unless
English units (lb/1,000 lb of otherwise noted.
product)
§ 408.280 Applicability; description of
BOD5 ................................... 67 17 the sardine processing subcategory.
TSS ...................................... 56 39
Oil and grease ..................... 0.64 0.42 The provisions of this subpart are ap-
pH ........................................ (1) (1) plicable to discharges resulting from
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. the canning of sardines or sea herring
for sardines. These provisions, how-
[40 FR 55794, Dec. 1, 1975, as amended at 42 ever, do not cover the relatively new
FR 6813, Feb. 4, 1977] steaking operation in which cutting
machines are used for preparing fish
§ 408.276 Pretreatment standards for steaks.
new sources.
Any new source subject to this sub- § 408.281 Specialized definitions.
part that introduces process waste- For the purpose of this subpart:
water pollutants into a publicly owned (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
treatment works must comply with 40 eral definitions, abbreviations and
CFR part 403. In addition, the following methods of analyses set forth in part
pretreatment standard establishes the 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
quantity or quality of pollutants or subpart.
pollutant properties controlled by this (b) The term seafood shall mean the
section which may be discharged to a raw material, including freshwater and
publicly owned treatment works by a saltwater fish and shellfish, to be proc-
new source subject to the provisions of essed, in the form in which it is re-
this subpart: ceived at the processing plant.
153
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00153 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.282 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
154
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00154 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.292
155
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00155 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.293 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
156
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00156 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.306
157
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00157 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.307 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
158
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00158 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.316
§ 408.314 Pretreatment standards for (2) Any Alaskan herring fillet proc-
existing sources. essing facility not covered under
Any existing source subject to this § 408.315(a)(1) shall meet the following
subpart that introduces process waste- limitations: No pollutants may be dis-
water pollutants into a publicly owned charged which exceed 1.27 cm (0.5 inch)
treatment works must comply with 40 in any dimension.
CFR part 403. In addition, the following (b) [Reserved]
pretreatment standard establishes the
quantity or quality of pollutants or § 408.316 Pretreatment standards for
pollutant properties controlled by this new sources.
section which may be discharged to a Any new source subject to this sub-
publicly owned treatment works by a part that introduces process waste-
point source subject to the provisions water pollutants into a publicly owned
of this subpart. treatment works must comply with 40
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard CFR part 403. In addition, the following
pretreatment standard establishes the
BOD5 .............................................. No limitation. quantity or quality of pollutants or
TSS ................................................. Do.
pH ................................................... Do. pollutant properties controlled by this
Oil and grease ................................ Do. section which may be discharged to a
publicly owned treatment works by a
[40 FR 55798, Dec. 1, 1975, as amended at 60 new source subject to the provisions of
FR 33948, June 29, 1995] this subpart:
159
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00159 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.317 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
160
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00160 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 408.332
161
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00161 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 408.333 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
162
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00162 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 409
163
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00163 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 409.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
practicable control technology currently seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. L. 95–
available. 217.
409.57 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best Subpart A—Beet Sugar Processing
conventional pollutant control tech- Subcategory
nology (BCT).
Subpart F—Hilo-Hamakua Coast of the Is- SOURCE: 39 FR 4037, Jan. 31, 1974, unless
otherwise noted.
land of Hawaii Raw Cane Sugar Proc-
essing Subcategory § 409.10 Applicability; description of
409.60 Applicability; description of the Hilo- the beet sugar processing sub-
Hamakua Coast of the Island of Hawaii category.
raw cane sugar processing subcategory. The provisions of this subpart are ap-
409.61 Specialized definitions.
409.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
plicable to discharges resulting from
resenting the degree of effluent reduction any operation attendant to the proc-
attainable by the application of the best essing of sugar beets for the production
practicable control technology currently of sugar.
available.
409.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- § 409.11 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best For the purpose of this subpart:
conventional pollutant control tech- (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
nology (BCT). eral definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in part
Subpart G—Hawaiian Raw Cane Sugar 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
Processing Subcategory subpart.
409.70 Applicability; description of the Ha- (b) The term barometric condensing op-
waiian raw cane sugar processing subcat- erations shall mean those operations or
egory. processes directly associated with or
409.71 Specialized definitions. related to the concentration and crys-
409.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- tallization of sugar solutions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best (c) The term product shall mean crys-
practicable control technology currently tallized refined sugar.
available.
409.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- § 409.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
resenting the degree of effluent reduction representing the degree of effluent
attainable by the application of the best reduction attainable by the applica-
conventional pollutant control tech- tion of the best practicable control
nology (BCT). technology currently available.
Subpart H—Puerto Rican Raw Cane Sugar The following limitations establish
Processing Subcategory the quantity or quality of pollutants or
pollutant properties, controlled by this
409.80 Applicability; description of the section, which may be discharged by a
Puerto Rican raw cane sugar processing point source subject to the provisions
subcategory. of this subpart after application of the
409.81 Specialized definitions.
409.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- best practicable control technology
resenting the degree of effluent reduction currently available; provided however,
attainable by the application of the best that a discharge by a point source may
practicable control technology currently be made in accordance with the limita-
available. tions set forth in either paragraph (a)
409.87 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- of this section exclusively, or para-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
graph (b) of this section exclusively,
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- below:
nology (BCT). (a) The following limitations estab-
lish the maximum permissible dis-
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b)
and (c), 307 (c) and (d), and 316(b) of the Fed- charge of process waste water pollut-
eral Water Pollution Control Act, as amend- ants when the process waste water dis-
ed; 33 U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 charge results from barometric con-
(b) and (c), 1317(c), and 1326(c); 86 Stat. 816 et densing operations only.
164
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00164 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 409.13
165
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00165 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 409.14 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
166
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00166 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 409.27
167
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00167 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 409.30 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
168
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00168 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 409.42
169
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00169 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 409.47 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
achieve the following effluent limita- Effluent limitations, the total of the
tions representing the degree of efflu- Effluent characteristic daily values for the entire dis-
charge period shall not exceed—
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
technology currently available (BPT):
English units (lb/1,000 lb of gross
(a) Any cane sugar factory continu- cane)
ously discharging both barometric con-
denser cooling water and other process BOD5 ............................ 0.63.
waste waters shall meet the following TSS ............................... 0.47.
pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
limitations. The BOD5 limitation is de-
termined by the addition of the net
BOD5 attributable to the barometric [40 FR 8503, Feb. 27, 1975, as amended at 60
FR 33950, June 29, 1995]
condenser cooling water to that
amount of BOD5 attributable to the § 409.47 Effluent limitations guidelines
treated process waste water. The TSS representing the degree of effluent
limitation is that amount of TSS at- reduction attainable by the applica-
tributable to the treated process waste tion of the best conventional pollut-
water, excluding barometric condenser ant control technology (BCT).
cooling water. Except as provided in §§ 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point
Effluent limitations
source subject to this subpart shall
Average of daily achieve the following effluent limita-
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days tions representing the degree of efflu-
day shall not ent reduction attainable by the appli-
exceed—
cation of the best conventional pollut-
Metric units (kg/kkg of gross ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
cane) itations shall be the same as those
specified for conventional pollutants
BOD5 ................................... 1.14 0.63
TSS ...................................... 1.41 0.47
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 409.42
pH ........................................ (1) (1) of this subpart for the best practicable
control technology currently available
English units (lb/1,000 lb of (BPT).
gross cane)
[51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986]
BOD5 ................................... 1.14 0.63
TSS ...................................... 1.41 0.47
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Subpart E—Florida and Texas Raw
1 Within
Cane Sugar Processing
the range 6.0 to 9.0.
Subcategory
(b) Any cane sugar factory employing
waste stabilization where all or a por- SOURCE: 40 FR 8503, Feb. 27, 1975, unless
tion of the waste water discharge is otherwise noted.
stored for the entire grinding season
shall meet the following limitations. § 409.50 Applicability; description of
The BOD5 limitation is determined by the Florida and Texas raw cane
the addition of the net BOD5 attrib- sugar processing subcategory.
utable to the barometric condenser The provisions of this subpart are ap-
cooling water to that amount of BOD5 plicable to discharges resulting from
attributable to the treated process the processing of sugar cane into a raw
waste water. The TSS limitation is sugar product for those cane sugar fac-
that amount of TSS attributable to the tories located in the states of Florida
treated process waste water, excluding and Texas.
barometric condenser cooling water.
§ 409.51 Specialized definitions.
Effluent limitations, the total of the
Effluent characteristic daily values for the entire dis- For the purpose of this subpart:
charge period shall not exceed— (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
Metric units (kg/kkg of gross cane)
eral definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
BOD5 ............................ 0.63. part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
TSS ............................... 0.47. (b) [Reserved]
170
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00170 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 409.62
171
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00171 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 409.67 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
172
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00172 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 409.87
173
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00173 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 410 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
achieve the following effluent limita- 410.24 Pretreatment standards for existing
tions representing the degree of efflu- sources (PSES).
ent reduction attainable by the appli- 410.25 New source performance standards
(NSPS).
cation of the best conventional pollut- 410.26 Pretreatment standards for new
ant control technology (BCT): The lim- sources (PSNS).
itations shall be the same as those 410.27 Effluent limitations representing the
specified for conventional pollutants degree of effluent reduction attainable
(which are defined in § 401.16) in § 409.82 by the application of the best conven-
of this subpart for the best practicable tional pollutant control technology
control technology currently available (BCT). [Reserved]
(BPT).
Subpart C—Low Water Use Processing
[51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986] Subcategory
410.30 Applicability; description of the low
PART 410—TEXTILE MILLS POINT water use processing subcategory.
SOURCE CATEGORY 410.31 Specialized definitions.
410.32 Effluent limitations representing the
GENERAL PROVISIONS degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best practicable
Sec. control technology currently available
410.00 Applicability. (BPT).
410.01 General definitions. 410.33 Effluent limitations representing the
410.02 Monitoring requirements. [Reserved]
degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available
Subpart A—Wool Scouring Subcategory technology economically achievable
410.10 Applicability; description of the wool (BAT).
scouring subcategory. 410.34 Pretreatment standards for existing
410.11 Specialized definitions. sources (PSES).
410.12 Effluent limitations representing the 410.35 New source performance standards
degree of effluent reduction attainable (NSPS).
by the application of the best practicable 410.36 Pretreatment standards for new
control technology currently available sources (PSNS).
(BPT). 410.37 Effluent limitations representing the
410.13 Effluent limitations representing the degree of effluent reduction attainable
degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best conven-
by the application of the best available tional pollutant control technology
technology economically achievable (BCT). [Reserved]
(BAT).
410.14 Pretreatment standards for existing Subpart D—Woven Fabric Finishing
sources (PSES). Subcategory
410.15 New source performance standards
(NSPS). 410.40 Applicability; description of the
410.16 Pretreatment standards for new woven fabric finishing subcategory.
sources (PSNS). 410.41 Specialized definitions.
410.17 Effluent limitations representing the 410.42 Effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best conven- by the application of the best practicable
tional pollutant control technology control technology currently available
(BCT). [Reserved] (BPT).
410.43 Effluent limitations representing the
Subpart B—Wool Finishing Subcategory degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available
410.20 Applicability; description of the wool technology economically achievable
finishing subcategory. (BAT).
410.21 Specialized definitions. 410.44 Pretreatment standards for existing
410.22 Effluent limitations representing the sources (PSES).
degree of effluent reduction attainable 410.45 New source performance standards
by the application of the best practicable (NSPS).
control technology currently available 410.46 Pretreatment standards for new
(BPT). sources (PSNS).
410.23 Effluent limitations representing the 410.47 Effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available by the application of the best conven-
technology economically achievable tional pollutant control technology
(BAT). (BCT). [Reserved]
174
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00174 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 410
175
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00175 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.00 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
410.97 Effluent limitations representing the subpart, shall mean the final material
degree of effluent reduction attainable produced or processed at the mill.
by the application of the best conven-
tional pollutant control technology § 410.02 Monitoring requirements. [Re-
(BCT). [Reserved]
served]
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b), (c), (e), and
(g), 306 (b) and (c), 307 (b) and (c), and 501 of
the Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pol-
Subpart A—Wool Scouring
lution Control Act Amendments of 1972, as Subcategory
amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977) (the
‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314 (b), (c), (e), and § 410.10 Applicability; description of
(g), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317 (b) and (c), and 1361; the wool scouring subcategory.
86 Stat. 186 et seq., Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat.
1567, Pub. L. 95–217.
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to process wastewater dis-
SOURCE: 47 FR 38819, Sept. 2, 1982, unless charges resulting from the following
otherwise noted.
types of textile mills: wool scouring,
GENERAL PROVISIONS topmaking, and general cleaning of raw
wool.
§ 410.00 Applicability.
§ 410.11 Specialized definitions.
This part applies to any textile mill
or textile processing facility which dis- In addition to the definitions set
charges or may discharge process forth in 40 CFR part 401 and § 410.01 of
wastewater pollutants to the waters of this part, the following definitions
the United States, or which introduces apply to this subpart:
or may introduce process wastewater (a) The term wool shall mean the dry
pollutants into a publicly owned treat- raw wool as it is received by the wool
ment works. scouring mill.
(b) The term oil and grease shall mean
§ 410.01 General definitions. total recoverable oil and grease as
In addition to the definitions set measured by the procedure listed in 40
forth in 40 CFR part 401, the following CFR part 136.
definitions apply to this part: (c) The term commission scouring shall
(a) Sulfide shall mean total sulfide mean the scouring of wool, 50 percent
(dissolved and acid soluble) as meas- or more of which is owned by others, in
ured by the procedures listed in 40 CFR mills that are 51 percent or more inde-
part 136. pendent (i.e., only a minority owner-
(b) Phenols shall mean total phenols ship by company(ies) with greige or in-
as measured by the procedure listed in tegrated operations); the mills must
40 CFR part 136. process 20 percent or more of their
(c) Total Chromium shall mean commissioned production through
hexavalent and trivalent chromium as batch, noncontinuous processing oper-
measured by the procedures listed in 40 ations.
CFR part 136.
(d) The term commission finishing § 410.12 Effluent limitations rep-
shall mean the finishing of textile ma- resenting the degree of effluent re-
terials, 50 percent or more of which are duction attainable by the applica-
owned by others, in mills that are 51 tion of the best practicable control
percent or more independent (i.e., only technology currently available
a minority ownership by company(ies) (BPT).
with greige or integrated operations); (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
the mills must process 20 percent or 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
more of their commissioned production source subject to this subpart must
through batch, noncontinuous proc- achieve the following effluent limita-
essing operations with 50 percent or tions representing the degree of efflu-
more of their commissioned orders ent reduction attainable by the appli-
processed in 5000 yard or smaller lots. cation of the best practicable control
(e) The term product, except where a technology currently available (BPT):
specialized definition is included in the
176
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00176 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.20
177
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00177 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.21 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR Note: Additional allocations for ‘‘commission finishers’’ are
not available to new sources.
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.
178
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00178 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.33
179
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00179 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.34 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
180
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00180 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.43
source subject to this subpart must the provisions of this subpart, in addi-
achieve the following effluent limita- tion to the discharge allowed by para-
tions representing the degree of efflu- graph (a) of this section.
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control BPT limitations
technology currently available (BPT): Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
Maximum for daily values
BPT limitations any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
any 1 day for 30 con- lb) of product
secutive days
181
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00181 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.44 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
(e) Additional allocations equal to
Pollutant or pollutant property the effluent limitations established in
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this
secutive days
section are allowed any existing point
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 source subject to such effluent limita-
lb) of product tions that finishes woven fabrics
through ‘‘commission finishing’’ as de-
COD ....................................... 20.0 10.0
fined in § 410.01.
(c) Except as provided in paragraph [47 FR 38819, Sept. 2, 1982, as amended at 48
(e) of this section for commission fin- FR 39624, Sept. 1, 1983]
ishing operations, the following limita-
tions establish the quantity or quality § 410.44 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources (PSES).
of pollutants or pollutant properties,
controlled by this section and attrib- Any existing source subject to this
utable to the finishing of woven fabrics subpart that introduces process waste-
through simple manufacturing oper- water pollutants into a publicly owned
ations employing a natural and syn- treatment works must comply with 40
thetic fiber blend or through complex CFR part 403.
manufacturing operations employing a
synthetic fiber, which may be dis- § 410.45 New source performance
charged by a point source subject to standards (NSPS).
the provisions of this subpart, in addi- Any new source subject to this sub-
tion to the discharge allowed by para- part must achieve the following new
graph (a) of this section. source performance standards (NSPS):
182
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00182 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.52
183
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00183 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.53 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
achieve the following effluent limita- tion to the discharge allowed by para-
tions representing the degree of efflu- graph (a) of this section.
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control BPT limitations
technology currently available (BPT): Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
BPT limitations for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive
Average of days
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- Kg/kkg (or pounds per
secutive days 1,000 lb) of product
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
lb) of product COD ........................................... 40.0 20.0
184
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00184 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.55
(d) Additional allocations equal to NOTE: Additional allocations for ‘‘commission finishers’’ are
not available to new sources.
the effluent limitations established in
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this sec- HOSIERY PRODUCTS
tion are allowed any existing point
source subject to such effluent limita- NSPS
tions that finishes knit fabrics through Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
‘‘commission finishing’’ as defined in Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
§ 410.01. secutive days
[47 FR 38819, Sept. 2, 1982, as amended at 48 Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
FR 39624, Sept. 1, 1983] lb) of product
185
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00185 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.56 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
186
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00186 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.70
187
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00187 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.71 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
188
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00188 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 410.86
189
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00189 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 410.87 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
190
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00190 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 411.11
191
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00191 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 411.12 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- § 411.14 Pretreatment standards for
eral definitions, abbreviations and existing sources.
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR Any existing source subject to this
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. subpart that introduces process waste-
water pollutants into a publicly owned
§ 411.12 Effluent limitations guidelines treatment works must comply with 40
representing the degree of effluent CFR part 403. In addition, the following
reduction attainable by the applica- pretreatment standard establishes the
tion of the best practicable control
quantity or quality of pollutants or
technology currently available.
pollutant properties controlled by this
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 section which may be discharged to a
through 125.32, any existing point publicly owned treatment works by a
source subject to this subpart shall point source subject to the provisions
achieve the following effluent limita- of this subpart.
tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
cation of the best practicable control pH ................................................... No limitation.
technology currently available (BPT): Temperature (heat) ......................... Do.
TSS ................................................. Do.
Effluent limitations (maximum for
Effluent characteristic any 1 day)
[40 FR 6440, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60
Metric units (kg/kkg of product)
FR 33951, June 29, 1995]
TSS ............................... 0.005.
Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet § 411.15 Standards of performance for
temperature. new sources.
pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
The following standards of perform-
English units (lb/1,000 lb of ance establish the quantity or quality
product) of pollutants or pollutant properties,
controlled by this section, which may
TSS ............................... 0.005.
Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet
be discharged by a new source subject
temperature. to the provisions of this subpart:
pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
Effluent limitations (maximum for
Effluent characteristic any 1 day)
[39 FR 6591, Feb. 20, 1974, as amended at 60
Metric units (kg/kkg of product)
FR 33950, June 29, 1995]
TSS ............................... 0.005.
§ 411.13 Effluent limitations guidelines
Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet
representing the degree of effluent temperature.
reduction attainable by the applica- pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
tion of the best available tech-
nology economically achievable. English units (lb/1,000 lb of
product)
The following limitations establish
the quantity or quality of pollutants or TSS ............................... 0.005.
pollutant properties, controlled by this Temperature (heat) ....... Not to exceed 3 °C rise above inlet
section, which may be discharged by a temperature.
point source subject to the provisions pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
192
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00192 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 411.24
193
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00193 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 411.25 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
point source subject to the provisions (which are defined in § 401.16) in § 411.22
of this subpart. of this subpart for the best practicable
control techology currently available
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
(BPT).
pH ................................................... No limitation.
BOD5 .............................................. Do. [51 FR 24999, July 9, 1986]
TSS ................................................. Do.
194
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00194 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 411.37
195
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00195 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 412 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
196
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00196 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 412.4
(e) Land application area means land (j) Analytical methods. The param-
under the control of an AFO owner or eters that are regulated or referenced
operator, whether it is owned, rented, in this part and listed with approved
or leased, to which manure, litter, or methods of analysis in Table 1B at 40
process wastewater from the produc- CFR 136.3 are defined as follows:
tion area is or may be applied. (1) Ammonia (as N) means ammonia
(f) New source is defined at 40 CFR reported as nitrogen.
122.2. New source criteria are defined at (2) BOD5 means 5-day biochemical
40 CFR 122.29(b). oxygen demand.
(g) Overflow means the discharge of (3) Nitrate (as N) means nitrate re-
ported as nitrogen.
manure or process wastewater result-
(4) Total dissolved solids means nonfil-
ing from the filling of wastewater or
terable residue.
manure storage structures beyond the
(k) The parameters that are regu-
point at which no more manure, proc- lated or referenced in this part and
ess wastewater, or storm water can be listed with approved methods of anal-
contained by the structure. ysis in Table 1A at 40 CFR 136.3 are de-
(h) Production area means that part of fined as follows:
an AFO that includes the animal con- (1) Fecal coliform means fecal coliform
finement area, the manure storage bacteria.
area, the raw materials storage area, (2) Total coliform means all coliform
and the waste containment areas. The bacteria.
animal confinement area includes but
is not limited to open lots, housed lots, § 412.3 General pretreatment stand-
feedlots, confinement houses, stall ards.
barns, free stall barns, milkrooms, Any source subject to this part that
milking centers, cowyards, barnyards, introduces process wastewater pollut-
medication pens, walkers, animal ants into a publicly owned treatment
walkways, and stables. The manure works (POTW) must comply with 40
storage area includes but is not limited CFR part 403.
to lagoons, runoff ponds, storage sheds,
stockpiles, under house or pit storages, § 412.4 Best management practices
liquid impoundments, static piles, and (BMPs) for land application of ma-
nure, litter, and process waste-
composting piles. The raw materials water.
storage area includes but is not limited
to feed silos, silage bunkers, and bed- (a) Applicability. This section applies
ding materials. The waste containment to any CAFO subject to subpart C of
area includes but is not limited to set- this part (Dairy and Beef Cattle other
tling basins, and areas within berms than Veal Calves) or subpart D of this
part (Swine, Poultry, and Veal Calves).
and diversions which separate
(b) Specialized definitions.
uncontaminated storm water. Also in-
(1) Setback means a specified distance
cluded in the definition of production
from surface waters or potential con-
area is any egg washing or egg proc- duits to surface waters where manure,
essing facility, and any area used in litter, and process wastewater may not
the storage, handling, treatment, or be land applied. Examples of conduits
disposal of mortalities. to surface waters include but are not
(i) Ten (10)-year, 24-hour rainfall event, limited to: Open tile line intake struc-
25-year, 24-hour rainfall event, and 100- tures, sinkholes, and agricultural well
year, 24-hour rainfall event mean pre- heads.
cipitation events with a probable re- (2) Vegetated buffer means a narrow,
currence interval of once in ten years, permanent strip of dense perennial
or twenty five years, or one hundred vegetation established parallel to the
years, respectively, as defined by the contours of and perpendicular to the
National Weather Service in Technical dominant slope of the field for the pur-
Paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall Frequency poses of slowing water runoff, enhanc-
Atlas of the United States,’’ May, 1961, ing water infiltration, and minimizing
or equivalent regional or State rainfall the risk of any potential nutrients or
probability information developed from pollutants from leaving the field and
this source. reaching surface waters.
197
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00197 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 412.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
198
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00198 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 412.22
199
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00199 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§§ 412.23–412.24 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Maximum Maximum
Maximum Maximum
Regulated parameter monthly monthly
daily 1 daily 2
average 1 average 2
200
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00200 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 412.35
subpart may request the Director to es- (3) The CAFO shall attain the limita-
tablish NPDES permit effluent limita- tions and requirements of this para-
tions based upon site-specific alter- graph as of the date of permit cov-
native technologies that achieve a erage.
quantity of pollutants discharged from (b) For CAFO land application areas.
the production area equal to or less Discharges from land application areas
than the quantity of pollutants that are subject to the following require-
would be discharged under the baseline ments:
performance standards as provided by (1) Develop and implement the best
paragraph (a)(1) of this section. management practices specified in
(i) Supporting information. In request- § 412.4;
ing site-specific effluent limitations to (2) Maintain the records specified at
be included in the NPDES permit, the § 412.37 (c);
CAFO owner or operator must submit a (3) The CAFO shall attain the limita-
supporting technical analysis and any tions and requirements of this para-
other relevant information and data graph by December 31, 2006.
that would support such site-specific
effluent limitations within the time § 412.32 Effluent limitations attainable
frame provided by the Director. The by the application of the best con-
supporting technical analysis must in- ventional pollutant control tech-
clude calculation of the quantity of nology (BCT).
pollutants discharged, on a mass basis Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
where appropriate, based on a site-spe- through 125.32, any existing point
cific analysis of a system designed, source subject to this subpart must
constructed, operated, and maintained achieve the following effluent limita-
to contain all manure, litter, and proc- tions representing the application of
ess wastewater, including the runoff BCT:
from a 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event. (a) For CAFO production areas: the
The technical analysis of the discharge CAFO shall attain the same limita-
of pollutants must include: tions and requirements as § 412.31(a).
(A) All daily inputs to the storage (b) For CAFO land application areas:
system, including manure, litter, all the CAFO shall attain the same limita-
process waste waters, direct precipita- tions and requirements as § 412.31(b).
tion, and runoff.
(B) All daily outputs from the storage § 412.33 Effluent limitations attainable
system, including losses due to evapo- by the application of the best avail-
ration, sludge removal, and the re- able technology economically
moval of waste water for use on crop- achievable (BAT).
land at the CAFO or transport off site. Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
(C) A calculation determining the through 125.32, any existing point
predicted median annual overflow vol- source subject to this subpart must
ume based on a 25-year period of actual achieve the following effluent limita-
rainfall data applicable to the site. tions representing the application of
(D) Site-specific pollutant data, in- BAT:
cluding N, P, BOD5, TSS, for the CAFO (a) For CAFO production areas: the
from representative sampling and anal- CAFO shall attain the same limita-
ysis of all sources of input to the stor- tions and requirements as § 412.31(a).
age system, or other appropriate pol- (b) For CAFO land application areas:
lutant data. the CAFO shall attain the same limita-
(E) Predicted annual average dis- tions and requirements as § 412.31(b).
charge of pollutants, expressed where
appropriate as a mass discharge on a § 412.34 [Reserved]
daily basis (lbs/day), and calculated
considering paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(A) § 412.35 New source performance
through (a)(2)(i)(D) of this section. standards (NSPS).
(ii) The Director has the discretion to Any new point source subject to this
request additional information to sup- subpart must achieve the following ef-
plement the supporting technical anal- fluent limitations representing the ap-
ysis, including inspection of the CAFO. plication of NSPS:
201
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00201 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 412.36 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(a) For CAFO production areas. The tion from a 100-year, 24-hour rainfall
CAFO shall attain the same limita- event.
tions and requirements as § 412.31(a)(1) (3) Corrective actions. Any deficiencies
and § 412.31(a)(2). found as a result of these inspections
(b) For CAFO land application areas: must be corrected as soon as possible.
The CAFO shall attain the same limi- (4) Mortality handling. Mortalities
tations and requirements as must not be disposed of in any liquid
§ 412.31(b)(1) and § 412.31(b)(2). manure or process wastewater system,
(c) The CAFO shall attain the limita- and must be handled in such a way as
tions and requirements of this para- to prevent the discharge of pollutants
graph as of the date of permit cov- to surface water, unless alternative
erage. technologies pursuant to § 412.31(a)(2)
(d) Any source subject to this subpart and approved by the Director are de-
that commenced discharging after signed to handle mortalities.
April 14, 1993, and prior to April 14, (b) Record keeping requirements for the
2003, which was a new source subject to production area. Each CAFO must
the standards specified in § 412.15, re- maintain on-site for a period of five
vised as of July 1, 2002, must continue years from the date they are created a
to achieve those standards for the ap- complete copy of the information re-
plicable time period specified in 40 CFR quired by 40 CFR 122.21(i)(1) and 40 CFR
122.29(d)(1). Thereafter, the source must 122.42(e)(1)(ix) and the records specified
achieve the standards specified in in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(6) of
§ 412.31(a) and (b). this section. The CAFO must make
these records available to the Director
§ 412.36 [Reserved] and, in an authorized State, the Re-
gional Administrator, or his or her des-
§ 412.37 Additional measures. ignee, for review upon request.
(1) Records documenting the inspec-
(a) Each CAFO subject to this sub- tions required under paragraph (a)(1) of
part must implement the following re- this section;
quirements: (2) Weekly records of the depth of the
(1) Visual inspections. There must be manure and process wastewater in the
routine visual inspections of the CAFO liquid impoundment as indicated by
production area. At a minimum, the the depth marker under paragraph
following must be visually inspected: (a)(2) of this section;
(i) Weekly inspections of all storm (3) Records documenting any actions
water diversion devices, runoff diver- taken to correct deficiencies required
sion structures, and devices channel- under paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
ling contaminated storm water to the Deficiencies not corrected within 30
wastewater and manure storage and days must be accompanied by an expla-
containment structure; nation of the factors preventing imme-
(ii) Daily inspection of water lines, diate correction;
including drinking water or cooling (4) Records of mortalities manage-
water lines; ment and practices used by the CAFO
(iii) Weekly inspections of the ma- to meet the requirements of paragraph
nure, litter, and process wastewater (a)(4) of this section.
impoundments; the inspection will (5) Records documenting the current
note the level in liquid impoundments design of any manure or litter storage
as indicated by the depth marker in structures, including volume for solids
paragraph (a)(2) of this section. accumulation, design treatment vol-
(2) Depth marker. All open surface liq- ume, total design volume, and approxi-
uid impoundments must have a depth mate number of days of storage capac-
marker which clearly indicates the ity;
minimum capacity necessary to con- (6) Records of the date, time, and es-
tain the runoff and direct precipitation timated volume of any overflow.
of the 25-year, 24-hour rainfall event, (c) Recordkeeping requirements for the
or, in the case of new sources subject land application areas. Each CAFO must
to the requirements in § 412.46 of this maintain on-site a copy of its site-spe-
part, the runoff and direct precipita- cific nutrient management plan. Each
202
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00202 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 412.45
CAFO must maintain on-site for a pe- laying hens if the facility uses other
riod of five years from the date they than a liquid manure handling system;
are created a complete copy of the in- 55,000 turkeys; and 1,000 veal calves.
formation required by § 412.4 and 40
CFR 122.42(e)(1)(ix) and the records §§ 412.41–412.42 [Reserved]
specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through
(c)(10) of this section. The CAFO must § 412.43 Effluent limitations attainable
make these records available to the Di- by the application of the best prac-
rector and, in an authorized State, the ticable control technology currently
available (BPT).
Regional Administrator, or his or her
designee, for review upon request. Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
(1) Expected crop yields; through 125.32, any existing point
(2) The date(s) manure, litter, or source subject to this subpart must
process waste water is applied to each achieve the following effluent limita-
field; tions representing the application of
(3) Weather conditions at time of ap- BPT:
plication and for 24 hours prior to and (a) For CAFO production areas. (1) The
following application; CAFO shall attain the same limita-
(4) Test methods used to sample and tions and requirements as § 412.31(a)(1)
analyze manure, litter, process waste through (a)(2).
water, and soil; (2) The CAFO shall attain the limita-
(5) Results from manure, litter, proc- tions and requirements of this para-
ess waste water, and soil sampling; graph as of the date of permit cov-
(6) Explanation of the basis for deter- erage.
mining manure application rates, as (b) For CAFO land application areas.
provided in the technical standards es- (1) The CAFO shall attain the same
tablished by the Director. limitations and requirements as
(7) Calculations showing the total ni- § 412.31(b)(1) and (b)(2).
trogen and phosphorus to be applied to (2) The CAFO shall attain the limita-
each field, including sources other than tions and requirements of this para-
manure, litter, or process wastewater; graph by December 31, 2006.
(8) Total amount of nitrogen and
phosphorus actually applied to each § 412.44 Effluent limitations attainable
field, including documentation of cal- by the application of the best con-
culations for the total amount applied; ventional pollutant control tech-
(9) The method used to apply the ma- nology (BCT).
nure, litter, or process wastewater; Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
(10) Date(s) of manure application through 125.32, any existing point
equipment inspection. source subject to this subpart must
achieve the following effluent limita-
Subpart D—Swine, Poultry, and tions representing the application of
Veal Calves BCT:
(a) For CAFO production areas: the
§ 412.40 Applicability. CAFO shall attain the same limita-
This subpart applies to operations de- tions and requirements as § 412.43(a).
fined as concentrated animal feeding (b) For CAFO land application areas:
operations (CAFOs) under 40 CFR 122.23 the CAFO shall attain the same limita-
and includes the following animals: tions and requirements as § 412.43(b).
swine; chickens; turkeys; and veal
calves. This subpart does not apply to § 412.45 Effluent limitations attainable
such CAFOs with less than the fol- by the application of the best avail-
lowing capacities: 2,500 swine each able technology economically
weighing 55 lbs. or more; 10,000 swine achievable (BAT).
each weighing less than 55 lbs.; 30,000 Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
laying hens or broilers if the facility through 125.32, any existing point
uses a liquid manure handling system; source subject to this subpart must
82,000 laying hens if the facility uses achieve the following effluent limita-
other than a liquid manure handling tions representing the application of
system; 125,000 chickens other than BAT:
203
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00203 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 412.46 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(a) For CAFO production areas: the alent or greater reduction in the quan-
CAFO shall attain the same limita- tity of pollutants released to other
tions and requirements as § 412.43(a). media from the production area (e.g.,
(b) For CAFO land application areas: air emissions from housing and stor-
the CAFO shall attain the same limita- age) and/or land application areas for
tions and requirements as § 412.43(b). all manure, litter, and process waste-
water at on-site and off-site locations.
§ 412.46 New source performance
standards (NSPS). The comparison of quantity of pollut-
ants must be made on a mass basis
Any new source subject to this sub- where appropriate. The Director has
part must achieve the following efflu-
the discretion to request supporting in-
ent limitations representing the appli-
formation to supplement such a re-
cation of NSPS:
(a) For CAFO production areas. There quest.
must be no discharge of manure, litter, (e) Any source subject to this subpart
or process wastewater pollutants into that commenced discharging after
waters of the U.S. from the production April 14, 1993, and prior to April 14,
area, subject to paragraphs (a)(1) 2003, which was a new source subject to
through (a)(3) of this section. the standards specified in § 412.15, re-
(1) Waste management and storage vised as of July 1, 2002, must continue
facilities designed, constructed, oper- to achieve those standards for the ap-
ated, and maintained to contain all plicable time period specified in 40 CFR
manure, litter, and process wastewater 122.29(d)(1). Thereafter, the source must
including the runoff and the direct pre- achieve the standards specified in
cipitation from a 100-year, 24-hour § 412.43(a) and (b).
rainfall event and operated in accord-
ance with the additional measures and § 412.47 Additional measures.
records required by § 412.47(a) and (b), (a) Each CAFO subject to this sub-
will fulfill the requirements of this sec-
part must implement the requirements
tion.
of § 412.37(a).
(2) The production area must be oper-
ated in accordance with the additional (b) Each CAFO subject to this sub-
measures required by § 412.47(a) and (b). part must comply with the record-
(3) Provisions for upset/bypass, as keeping requirements of § 412.37(b).
provided in 40 CFR 122.41(m)–(n), apply (c) Each CAFO subject to this sub-
to a new source subject to this provi- part must comply with the record-
sion. keeping requirements of § 412.37(c).
(b) For CAFO land application areas:
the CAFO shall attain the same limita- PART 413—ELECTROPLATING POINT
tions and requirements as § 412.43(b)(1). SOURCE CATEGORY
(c) The CAFO shall attain the limita-
tions and requirements of this para- GENERAL PROVISIONS
graph as of the date of permit cov-
erage. Sec.
(d) Voluntary superior environmental 413.01 Applicability and compliance dates.
performance standards. Any new source 413.02 General definitions.
CAFO subject to this subpart may re- 413.03 Monitoring requirements.
quest the Director to establish alter- 413.04 Standards for integrated facilities.
native NPDES permit limitations
based upon a demonstration that site- Subpart A—Electroplating of Common
specific innovative technologies will Metals Subcategory
achieve overall environmental per- 413.10 Applicability: Description of the elec-
formance across all media which is troplating of common metals sub-
equal to or superior to the reductions category.
achieved by baseline standards as pro- 413.11 Specialized definitions.
vided by § 412.46(a). The quantity of pol- 413.12–413.13 [Reserved]
lutants discharged from the production 413.14 Pretreatment standards for existing
area must be accompanied by an equiv- sources.
204
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00204 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.01
Subpart B—Electroplating of Precious (33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314(g), 1317, 1318, 1319, 1322,
Metals Subcategory 1325 and 1341(a)).
413.20 Applicability: Description of the elec- SOURCE: 46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, unless
troplating of precious metals sub- otherwise noted.
category.
413.21 Specialized definitions. GENERAL PROVISIONS
413.22–413.23 [Reserved]
413.24 Pretreatment standards for existing § 413.01 Applicability and compliance
sources. dates.
(a) This part shall apply to electro-
Subpart C—Electroplating of Specialty
plating operations in which metal is
Metals Subcategory [Reserved]
electroplated on any basis material and
Subpart D—Anodizing Subcategory to related metal finishing operations as
set forth in the various subparts,
413.40 Applicability: Description of the an- whether such operations are conducted
odizing subcategory.
in conjunction with electroplating,
413.41 Specialized definitions.
413.42–413.43 [Reserved] independently, or as part of some other
413.44 Pretreatment standards for existing operation. The compliance deadline for
sources. metals and cyanide at integrated fa-
cilities shall be June 30, 1984. The com-
Subpart E—Coatings Subcategory pliance date for metals and cyanide at
413.50 Applicability: Description of the non-integrated facilities shall be April
coatings subcategory. 27, 1984. Compliance with TTO for all
413.51 Specialized definitions. facilities shall be July 15, 1986. These
413.52–413.53 [Reserved] part 413 standards shall not apply to a
413.54 Pretreatment standards for existing facility which must comply with all
sources. the pollutant limitations listed in
Subpart F—Chemical Etching and Milling § 433.15 (metal finishing PSES).
Subcategory (b) Operations similar to electro-
plating which are specifically excepted
413.60 Applicability: Description of the from coverage of this part include:
chemical etching and milling sub- (1) Electrowinning and
category.
413.61 Specialized definitions. electrorefining conducted as a part of
413.62–413.63 [Reserved] nonferrous metal smelting and refining
413.64 Pretreatment standards for existing (40 CFR part 421);
sources. (2) Metal surface preparation and
conversion coating conducted as a part
Subpart G—Electroless Plating of coil coating (40 CFR part 465);
Subcategory
(3) Metal surface preparation and im-
413.70 Applicability: Description of the mersion plating or electroless plating
electroless plating subcategory. conducted as a part of porcelain enam-
413.71 Specialized definitions. eling (40 CFR part 466); and
413.72–413.73 [Reserved]
(4) Electrodeposition of active elec-
413.74 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. trode materials, electroimpregnation,
and electroforming conducted as a part
Subpart H—Printed Circuit Board of battery manufacturing (40 CFR part
Subcategory 461).
(c) Metallic platemaking and gravure
413.80 Applicability: Description of the
printed circuit board subcategory. cylinder preparation conducted within
413.81 Specialized definitions. or for printing and publishing facili-
413.82–413.83 [Reserved] ties, and continuous strip electro-
413.84 Pretreatment standards for existing plating conducted within iron and steel
sources. manufacturing facilities which intro-
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304(g), 307, 308, 309, duce pollutants into a publicly owned
402, 405, 501(a), Clean Water Act, as amended, treatment works are exempted from
205
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00205 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.02 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
the pretreatment standards for exist- one or more plant electroplating proc-
ing sources set forth in this part. ess wastewater lines must be combined
prior to or at the point of treatment
(Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the (or proposed treatment) with one or
Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu- more plant sewers carrying process
tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 wastewater from non-electroplating
U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean
Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217))
manufacturing operations.
(i) the term TTO shall mean total
[46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48 toxic organics, which is the summation
FR 32482, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 41410, Sept. 15, of all quantifiable values greater than
1983; 51 FR 40421, Nov. 7, 1986]
0.01 milligrams per liter for the fol-
lowing toxic organics:
§ 413.02 General definitions.
Acenaphthene
In addition to the definitions set Acrolein
forth in 40 CFR part 401 and the chem- Acrylonitrile
ical analysis methods set forth in 40 Benzene
CFR part 136, both of which are incor- Benzidine
porated herein by reference, the fol- Carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane)
Chlorobenzene
lowing definitions apply to this part: 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
(a) The term CN,A shall mean cya- Hexachlorobenzene
nide amenable to chlorination as de- 1,2-dichloroethane
fined by 40 CFR 136. 1,1,1-trichloroethane
(b) The term CN,T shall mean cya- Hexachloroethane
nide, total. 1,1-dichloroethane
(c) The term Cr,VI shall mean 1,1,2-trichloroethane
hexavalent chromium. 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
Chloroethane
(d) The term electroplating process Bis (2-chloroethyl) ether
wastewater shall mean process waste- 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether (mixed)
water generated in operations which 2-chloronaphthalene
are subject to regulation under any of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol
subparts A through H of this part. Parachlorometa cresol
(e) The term total metal is defined as Chloroform (trichloromethane)
the sum of the concentration or mass 2-chlorophenol
1,2-dichlorobenzene
of Copper (Cu), Nickel (Ni), Chromium 1,3-dichlorobenzene
(Cr) (total) and Zinc (Zn). 1,4-dichlorobenzene
(f) The term strong chelating agents is 3,3-dichlorobenzidine
defined as all compounds which, by vir- 1,1-dichloroethylene
tue of their chemical structure and 1,2-trans-dichloroethylene
amount present, form soluble metal 2,4-dichlorophenol
complexes which are not removed by 1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropylene (1,3-dichloropropene)
subsequent metals control techniques
2,4-dimethylphenol
such as pH adjustment followed by 2,4-dinitrotoluene
clarification or filtration. 2,6-dinitrotoluene
(g) The term control authority is de- 1,2-diphenylhydrazine
fined as the POTW if it has an approved Ethylbenzene
pretreatment program; in the absence Fluoranthene
of such a program, the NPDES State if 4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
it has an approved pretreatment pro-
Bis (2-chloroisopropyl) ether
gram or EPA if the State does not have Bis (2-chloroethoxy) methane
an approved program. Methylene chloride (dichloromethane)
(h) The term integrated facility is de- Methyl chloride (chloromethane)
fined as a facility that performs elec- Methyl bromide (bromomethane)
troplating as only one of several oper- Bromoform (tribromomethane)
ations necessary for manufacture of a Dichlorobromomethane
product at a single physical location Chlorodibromomethane
Hexachlorobutadiene
and has significant quantities of proc- Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
ess wastewater from non-electroplating Isophorone
manufacturing operations. In addition, Naphthalene
to qualify as an ‘‘integrated facility’’ Nitrobenzene
206
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00206 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.03
2-nitrophenol p-dioxin (TCDD)
4-nitrophenol
2,4-dinitrophenol (Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the
4,6-dinitro-o-cresol Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu-
N-nitrosodimethylamine tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33
N-nitrosodiphenylamine U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean
N-nitrosodi-n-propylamine Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217))
Pentachlorophenol
[46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48
Phenol
Bis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate FR 32483, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 43681, Sept. 26,
Butyl benzyl phthalate 1983; 51 FR 40421, Nov. 7, 1986]
Di-n-butyl phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate § 413.03 Monitoring requirements.
Diethyl phthalate (a) In lieu of monitoring for TTO, the
Dimethyl phthalate
1,2-benzanthracene
control authority may allow industrial
(benzo(a)anthracene) users of POTWs to make the following
Benzo(a)pyrene (3,4-benzopyrene) certification as a comment to the peri-
3,4-Benzofluoranthene odic reports required by § 403.12(e):
(benzo(b)fluoranthene) ‘‘Based on my inquiry of the person or
11,12-benzofluoranthene
(benzo(k)fluoranthene)
persons directly responsible for man-
Chrysene aging compliance with the
Acenaphthylene pretreatment standard for total toxic
Anthracene organics (TTO), I certify that, to the
1,12-benzoperylene best of my knowledge and belief, no
(benzo(ghi)perylene)
dumping of concentrated toxic
Fluorene
Phenanthrene organics into the wastewaters has oc-
1,2,5,6-dibenzanthracene curred since filing the last discharge
(dibenzo(a,h)anthracene) monitoring report. I further certify
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) pyrene) that this facility is implementing the
(2,3-o-phenylene pyrene) toxic organic management plan sub-
Pyrene
Tetrachloroethylene mitted to the control authority.’’
Toluene (b) In requesting that no monitoring
Trichloroethylene be required industrial users of POTWs
Vinyl chloride (chloroethylene) shall submit a toxic organic manage-
Aldrin ment plan that specifies to the control
Dieldrin
Chlordane (technical mixture and metabo- authority’s satisfaction the toxic or-
lites) ganic compounds used; the method of
4,4-DDT disposal used instead of dumping, such
4,4-DDE (p,p-DDX) as reclamation, contract hauling, or in-
4,4-DDD (p,p-TDE) cineration; and procedures for assuring
Alpha-endosulfan
Beta-endosulfan
that toxic organics do not routinely
Endosulfan sulfate spill or leak into the wastewater.
Endrin (c) If monitoring is necessary to
Endrin aldehyde measure compliance with the TTO
Heptachlor standard the industrial user need ana-
Heptachlor epoxide
lyze only for those pollutants which
(BHC-hexachlorocyclohexane)
Alpha-BHC would reasonably be expected to be
Beta-BHC present.
Gamma-BHC
(Approved by the Office of Management and
Delta-BHC
(PCB-polychlorinated biphenyls) Budget under control number 2040–0074)
PCB-1242 (Arochlor 1242) (Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the
PCB-1254 (Arochlor 1254) Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu-
PCB-1221 (Arochlor 1221) tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33
PCB-1232 (Arochlor 1232) U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean
PCB-1248 (Arochlor 1248) Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217))
PCB-1260 (Arochlor 1260)
PCB-1016 (Arochlor 1016) [48 FR 32483, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 43681, Sept.
Toxaphene 26, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 34823, Sept. 4,
2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo- 1984]
207
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00207 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.04 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
208
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00208 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.14
SUBPART A—COMMON METALS FACILITIES DIS- SUBPART A—COMMON METALS FACILITIES DIS-
CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY
PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L) PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L)
Average of Average of
daily values daily values
Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu- Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring property any 1 day tive monitoring
days shall not days shall not
exceed exceed
209
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00209 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
210
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00210 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.44
SUBPART B—PRECIOUS METALS FACILITIES DIS- l (10,000 gal) or more per calendar day
CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY of electroplating process wastewater:
PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/SQ M-OPERATION)—
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
Continued
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
Average of
daily values
Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu- TTO ................................................ 2.13
property any 1 day tive monitoring
days shall not
exceed (h) In addition to paragraphs (a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) the following
Pb ...................................... 23 16 shall apply: An existing source submit-
Cd ...................................... 47 29
ting a certification in lieu of moni-
Total metals ....................... 410 267
toring pursuant to § 413.03 of this regu-
lation must implement the toxic or-
(e) For wastewater sources regulated
ganic management plan approved by
under paragraph (c) of this section, the
the control authority.
following optional control program
may be elected by the source intro- (Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the
ducing treated process wastewater into Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu-
a publicly owned treatment works with tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33
U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean
the concurrence of the control author- Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217))
ity. These optional pollutant param-
eters are not eligible for allowance for [46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48
FR 32484, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 43681, Sept. 26,
removal achieved by the publicly
1983]
owned treatment works under 40 CFR
403.7. In the absence of strong chelating
agents, after reduction of hexavalent Subpart C—Electroplating of
chromium wastes, and after neutraliza- Speciality Metals Subcategory
tion using calcium oxide (or hydroxide) [Reserved]
the following limitations shall apply:
Subpart D—Anodizing
SUBPART B—PRECIOUS METALS FACILITIES DIS- Subcategory
CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY
PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L) § 413.40 Applicability: Description of
the anodizing subcategory.
Average of
daily values The provisions of this subpart apply
Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu- to discharges of process wastewater re-
property any 1 day tive monitoring
days shall not sulting from the anodizing of ferrous or
exceed nonferrous materials.
CN, T ................................. 1.9 1.0
Pb ...................................... .6 .4
§ 413.41 Specialized definitions.
Cd ...................................... 1.2 .7 For the purpose of this subpart:
TSS .................................... 20.0 13.4 (a) The term sq m (‘‘sq ft’’) shall
pH ...................................... 1 1
mean the area plated expressed in
1 Within the range 7.5 to 10.0. square meters (square feet).
(b) The term operation shall mean
(f) In addition to paragraphs (a) and any step in the anodizing process in
(b) the following limitation shall apply which a metal is cleaned, anodized, or
for plants discharging less than 38,000 l colored when each such step is followed
(10,000 gal) per calendar day of electro- by a rinse.
plating process wastewater:
§§ 413.42–413.43 [Reserved]
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
211
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00211 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.44 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
part 403 and achieve the following SUBPART D—ANODIZING FACILITIES DIS-
pretreatment standards for existing CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY
sources (PSES): PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/SQ M-OPERATION)
(a) No user introducing wastewater
Average of
pollutants into a publicly owned treat- daily values
ment works under the provisions of Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring
this subpart shall augment the use of days shall not
process wastewater or otherwise dilute exceed
the wastewater as a partial or total CN, T ................................. 74 39
substitute for adequate treatment to Cu ...................................... 176 105
achieve compliance with this standard. Ni ....................................... 160 100
Cr ....................................... 273 156
(b) For a source discharging less than Zn ...................................... 164 102
38,000 liters (10,000 gal) per calendar Pb ...................................... 23 16
day of electroplating process waste- Cd ...................................... 47 29
Total metals ....................... 410 267
water the following limitations shall
apply: (e) For wastewater sources regulated
SUBPART D—ANODIZING FACILITIES DIS- under paragraph (c) of this section, the
CHARGING LESS THAN 38,000 LITERS PER following optional control program
DAY PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L) may be elected by the source intro-
ducing treated process wastewater into
Average of a publicly owned treatment works with
daily values the concurrence of the control author-
Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring ity. These optional pollutant param-
days shall not eters are not eligible for allowance for
exceed
removal achieved by the publicly
CN, A ................................. 5.0 2.7 owned treatment works under 40 CFR
Pb ...................................... 0.6 0.4 403.7. In the absence of strong chelating
Cd ...................................... 1.2 0.7
agents, after reduction of hexavalent
chromium wastes, and after neutraliza-
(c) For plants discharging 38,000 li- tion using calcium oxide (or hydroxide)
ters (10,000 gal) or more per calendar the following limitations shall apply:
day of electroplating process waste-
water the following limitations shall SUBPART D—ANODIZING FACILITIES DIS-
apply: CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY
PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L)
SUBPART D—ANODIZING FACILITIES DIS-
CHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE PER DAY Average of
daily values
PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L) Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring
Average of days shall not
daily values exceed
Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring CN,T .................................. 1.9 1.0
days shall not Pb ...................................... 0.6 0.4
exceed Cd ...................................... 1.2 0.7
TSS .................................... 20.0 13.4
CN, T ................................. 1.9 1.0 pH ...................................... (1) (1)
Cu ...................................... 4.5 2.7
1 Within the range 7.5 to 10.000.
Ni ....................................... 4.1 2.6
Cr ....................................... 7.0 4.0
Zn ...................................... 4.2 2.6
(f) In addition to paragraphs (a) and
Pb ...................................... 0.6 0.4 (b) the following limitation shall apply
Cd ...................................... 1.2 0.7 for plants discharging less than 38,000 l
Total metals ....................... 10.5 6.8 (10,000 gal) per calendar day of electro-
plating process wastewater:
(d) Alternatively, the following mass-
based standards are equivalent to and Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
may apply in place of those limitations Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
specified under paragraph (c) of this
section upon prior agreement between TTO ................................................ 4.57
a source subject to these standards and
the publicly owned treatment works (g) In addition to paragraphs (a), (c),
receiving such regulated wastes: (d), and (e) the following limitation
212
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00212 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.54
shall apply for plants discharging 38,000 Part 403 and achieve the following
l (10,000 gal) or more per calendar day pretreatment standards for existing
of electroplating process wastewater: sources (PSES):
(a) No user introducing wastewater
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
pollutants into a publicly owned treat-
Milligrams per liter (mg/l) ment works under the provisions of
this subpart shall augment the use of
TTO ................................................ 2.13 process wastewater or otherwise dilute
the wastewater as a partial or total
(h) In addition to paragraphs (a), (b), substitute for adequate treatment to
(c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) the following achieve compliance with this standard.
shall apply: An existing source submit- (b) For a source discharging less than
ting a certification in lieu of moni- 38,000 liters (10,000 gal) per calendar
toring pursuant to § 413.03 of this regu- day of electroplating process waste-
lation must implement the toxic or- water the following limitations shall
ganic management plan approved by apply:
the control authority.
(Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the SUBPART E—COATINGS FACILITIES DIS-
Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu- CHARGING LESS THAN 38,000 LITERS PER
tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 DAY PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/L)
U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean
Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217)) Average of
daily values
[46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48 Pollutant or pollutant Maximum for for 4 consecu-
property any 1 day tive monitoring
FR 32484, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 43681, Sept. 26, days shall not
1983] exceed
213
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00213 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.60 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
214
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00214 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.64
215
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00215 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.70 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
less than 38,000 l (10,000 gal) per cal- terial from an autocatalytic plating so-
endar day of electroplating process lution without application of electrical
wastewater: current.
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
(c) The term operation shall mean any
step in the electroless plating process
Milligrams per liter in which a metal is deposited on a basis
(mg/l)
material and which is followed by a
TTO ................................................ 4.57
rinse; this includes the related oper-
ations of alkaline cleaning, acid pickle,
(g) In addition to paragraphs (a), (c), and stripping, when each operation is
(d), and (e) of this section, the fol- followed by a rinse.
lowing limitation shall apply for plants
discharging 38,000 l (10,000 gal) or more §§ 413.72–413.73 [Reserved]
per calendar day of electroplating proc-
ess wastewater: § 413.74 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources.
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
Milligrams per liter and 403.13, any existing source subject
(mg/l) to this subpart which introduces pol-
lutants into a publicly owned treat-
TTO ................................................ 2.13
ment works must comply with 40 CFR
part 403 and achieve the following
(h) In addition to paragraphs (a), (b),
(c), (d), (e), (f), and (g) of this section, pretreatment standards for existing
the following shall apply: An existing sources (PSES):
source submitting a certification in (a) No User introducing wastewater
lieu of monitoring pursuant to § 413.03 pollutants into publicly owned treat-
of this regulation must implement the ment works under the provisions of
toxic organic management plan ap- this subpart shall augment the use of
proved by the control authority. process wastewater or otherwise dilute
the wastewater as a partial or total
(Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, 308, and 501 of the
Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu- substitute for adequate treatment to
tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 achieve compliance with this standard.
U.S.C. 1251 et. seq., as amended by the Clean (b) For a source discharging less than
Water Act of 1977, Pub. L. 95–217)) 38,000 liters (10,000 gal.) per calendar
[46 FR 9467, Jan. 28, 1981, as amended at 48 day of electroplating process waste-
FR 32484, July 15, 1983; 48 FR 43681, Sept. 26, water the following limitations shall
1983] apply:
216
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00216 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 413.74
217
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00217 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 413.80 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
218
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00218 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 414
SUBPART H—PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD FACILI- l (10,000 gal) or more per calendar day
TIES DISCHARGING 38,000 LITERS OR MORE of electroplating process wastewater:
PER DAY PSES LIMITATIONS (MG/SQ M-
OPERATION)—Continued Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for any 1 day
219
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00219 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 414 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
220
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00220 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.11
by the application of the best practicable Subpart A—General
control technology currently available
(BPT). § 414.10 General definitions.
414.82 Effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable As used in this part:
by the application of the best conven- (a) Except as provided in this regula-
tional pollutant control technology tion, the general definitions, abbrevia-
(BCT). [Reserved] tions and methods of analysis set forth
414.83 Effluent limitations representing the in part 401 of this chapter shall apply
degree of effluent reduction attainable to this part.
by the application of the best available (b) Pretreatment control authority
technology economically achievable means:
(BAT).
(1) The POTW if the POTW’s submis-
414.84 New source performance standards
(NSPS).
sion for its pretreatment program has
414.85 Pretreatment standards for existing been approved in accordance with the
sources (PSES). requirements of 40 CFR 403.11, or
414.86 Pretreatment standards for new (2) The Approval Authority if the
sources (PSNS). submission has not been approved.
(c) Priority pollutants means the toxic
Subpart I—Direct Discharge Point Sources pollutants listed in 40 CFR 401.15.
That Use End-of-Pipe Biological Treatment
§ 414.11 Applicability.
414.90 Applicability; description of the sub-
category of direct discharge point (a) The provisions of this part are ap-
sources that use end-of-pipe biological plicable to process wastewater dis-
treatment. charges from all establishments or por-
414.91 Toxic pollutant effluent limitations tions of establishments that manufac-
and standards for direct discharge point ture the organic chemicals, plastics,
sources that use end-of-pipe biological and synthetic fibers (OCPSF) products
treatment. or product groups covered by subparts
B through H of this regulation and are
Subpart J—Direct Discharge Point Sources included within the following U.S. De-
That Do Not Use End-of-Pipe Biological partment of Commerce Bureau of the
Treatment Census Standard Industrial Classifica-
414.100 Applicability; description of the sub- tion (SIC) major groups:
category of direct discharge point (1) SIC 2821—Plastic Materials, Syn-
sources that do not use end-of-pipe bio- thetic Resins, and Nonvulcanizable
logical treatment. Elastomers,
414.101 Toxic pollutant effluent limitations (2) SIC 2823—Cellulosic Man-Made Fi-
and standards for direct discharge point bers,
sources that do not use end-of-pipe bio- (3) SIC 2824—Synthetic Organic Fi-
logical treatment. bers, Except Cellulosic,
(4) SIC 2865—Cyclic Crudes and Inter-
Subpart K—Indirect Discharge Point
mediates, Dyes, and Organic Pigments,
Sources
(5) SIC 2869—Industrial Organic
414.110 Applicability; description of the sub- Chemicals, Not Elsewhere Classified.
category of indirect discharge point (b) The provisions of this part are ap-
sources. plicable to wastewater discharges from
414.111 Toxic pollutant standards for indi- OCPSF research and development,
rect discharge point sources. pilot plant, technical service and lab-
APPENDIX A TO PART 414—NON-COMPLEXED oratory bench scale operations if such
METAL-BEARING WASTE STREAMS AND CY- operations are conducted in conjunc-
ANIDE-BEARING WASTE STREAMS tion with and related to existing
APPENDIX B TO PART 414—COMPLEXED METAL- OCPSF manufacturing activities at the
BEARING WASTE STREAMS plant site.
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304, 306, 307, and 501, (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of
Pub. L. 92-500, 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 95–217, 91 this section, the provisions of this part
Stat. 156, Pub. L. 100–4, 101 Stat. 7 (33 U.S.C. are not applicable to discharges result-
1311, 1314, 1316, 1317, and 1361). ing from the manufacture of OCPSF
SOURCE: 52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, unless products if the products are included in
otherwise noted. the following SIC subgroups and have
221
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00221 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.11 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
in the past been reported by the estab- source of the cyanide-bearing waste
lishment under these subgroups and stream and establishes an alternative
not under the SIC groups listed in total cyanide or amenable cyanide lim-
paragraph (a) of this section: itation that reflects the best available
(1) SIC 2843085—bulk surface active technology economically achievable.
agents; The determination must be based upon
(2) SIC 28914—synthetic resin and a review of relevant engineering, pro-
rubber adhesives; duction, and sampling and analysis in-
(3) Chemicals and Chemical Prepara- formation, including measurements of
tions, not Elsewhere Classified: both total and amenable cyanide in the
(i) SIC 2899568—sizes, all types waste stream. An analysis of the ex-
(ii) SIC 2899597—other industrial tent of complexing in the waste
chemical specialties, including fluxes, stream, based on the foregoing infor-
plastic wood preparations, and em- mation, and its impact on cyanide
balming fluids; treatability shall be set forth in writ-
(4) SIC 2911058—aromatic hydro- ing and, for direct dischargers, be con-
carbons manufactured from purchased tained in the fact sheet required by 40
refinery products; and CFR 124.8.
(5) SIC 2911632—aliphatic hydro-
(h) Allowances for non-metal-bearing
carbons manufactured from purchased
waste streams. Discharge limitations for
refinery products.
chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and
(d) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of
zinc or discharge standards for lead and
this section, the provisions of this part
zinc may be established for waste
are not applicable to any discharges for
which a different set of previously pro- streams not listed in Appendix A of
mulgated effluent limitations guide- this part and not otherwise determined
lines and standards in this subchapter to be ‘‘metal-bearing waste streams’’ if
apply, unless the facility reports the permit writer or control authority
OCPSF products under SIC codes 2865, determines that the wastewater metals
2869, or 2821, and the facility’s OCPSF contamination is due to background
wastewaters are treated in a separate levels that are not reasonably avoid-
treatment system or discharged sepa- able from sources such as intake water,
rately to a publicly owned treatment corrosion of construction materials or
works. contamination of raw materials. The
(e) The provisions of this part do not determination must be based upon a re-
apply to any process wastewater dis- view of relevant plant operating condi-
charges from the manufacture of or- tions, process chemistry, engineering,
ganic chemical compounds solely by and sampling and analysis information.
extraction from plant and animal raw An analysis of the sources and levels of
materials or by fermentation proc- the metals, based on the foregoing in-
esses. formation, shall be set forth in writing;
(f) Discharges of chromium, copper, for direct dischargers, the analysis
lead, nickel, and zinc in ‘‘complexed shall be contained in the fact sheet re-
metal-bearing waste streams,’’ listed in quired by 40 CFR 124.8. For direct dis-
appendix B of this part, are not subject chargers, the permit writer may estab-
to the requirements of this part. lish limitations for chromium, copper,
(g) Non-amenable cyanide. Discharges lead, nickel, and zinc for non-‘‘metal-
of cyanide in ‘‘cyanide-bearing waste bearing waste streams’’ between the
streams’’ (listed in Appendix A to this lowest level which the permit writer
part) are not subject to the cyanide determines based on best professional
limitations and standards of this part judgment can be reliably measured and
if the permit writer or control author- the concentrations of such metals
ity determines that the cyanide limita- present in the wastestreams, but not to
tions and standards are not achievable exceed the applicable limitations con-
due to elevated levels of non-amenable tained in §§ 414.91 and 414.101. (For zinc,
cyanide (i.e., cyanide that is not the applicable limitations which may
oxidized by chlorine treatment) that not be exceeded are those appearing in
result from the unavoidable the tables in §§ 414.91 and 414.101, not
complexing of cyanide at the process the alternative limitations for rayon
222
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00222 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.21
( )( )
H
Plant BOD5 Limit = ∑ w j BOD5 Limit j
ess and the acrylic fiber manufacture
by the zinc chloride/solvent process set
forth in footnote 2 to each of these ta- j= B
bles.) For indirect dischargers, the con- and
( )( )
H
Plant TSS Limit = ∑ w j TSS Limit j .
trol authority may establish standards
for lead and zinc for non-‘‘metal-bear-
ing waste streams’’ between the lowest j= B
level which the control authority de- The ‘‘BOD5 Limitj’’ and ‘‘TSS Limitj’’
termines based on best professional are the respective subcategorical BOD5
judgment can be reliably measured and and TSS Maximum for Any One Day or
the concentration of such metals Maximum for Monthly Average limita-
present in the wastestreams, but not to tions.
exceed the applicable standards con-
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57
tained in §§ 414.25, 414.35, 414.45, 414.55,
FR 41843, Sept. 11, 1992]
414.65, 414.75, and 414.85. (For zinc, the
applicable standards which may not be § 414.12 Compliance date for
exceeded are those appearing in the ta- pretreatment standards for existing
bles in the above referenced sections, sources (PSES).
not the alternative standards for rayon All dischargers subject to PSES in
filber manufacture by the viscose proc- this part must comply with the stand-
ess set forth in footnote 2 to the table ards by no later than three years after
in § 414.25, or the alternative standards date of promulgation in the FEDERAL
for acrylic fiber manufacture by the REGISTER.
zinc chloride/solvent process set forth
in footnote 2 to the table in § 414.35.)
The limitations and standards for indi- Subpart B—Rayon Fibers
vidual dischargers shall be set on a § 414.20 Applicability; description of
mass basis by multiplying the con- the rayon fibers subcategory.
centration allowance established by
the permit writer or control authority The provisions of this subpart are ap-
by the process wastewater flow from plicable to process wastewater dis-
the individual wastestreams for which charges resulting from the manufac-
incidental metals have been found to ture of rayon fiber by the viscose proc-
be present. ess only.
(i) BOD5 and TSS limitations for § 414.21 Effluent limitations rep-
plants with production in two or more resenting the degree of effluent re-
subcategories. Any existing or new duction attainable by the applica-
source direct discharge point source tion of the best practicable control
subject to two or more of subparts B technology currently available
through H must achieve BOD5 and TSS (BPT).
discharges not exceeding the quantity Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
(mass) determined by multiplying the through 125.32, and in 40 CFR 414.11(i)
total OCPSF process wastewater flow for point sources with production in
subject to subparts B through H times two or more subcategories, any exist-
the following ‘‘OCPSF production-pro- ing point source subject to this subpart
portioned concentration’’: For a spe- must achieve discharges not exceeding
cific plant, let wj be the proportion of the quantity (mass) determined by
the plant’s total OCPSF production in multiplying the process wastewater
subcategory j. Then the plant-specific flow subject to this subpart times the
production-proportioned concentration concentration listed in the following
limitations are given by: table.
223
EC15NO91.016</MATH>
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00223 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.22 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
BPT effluent this part and also must not exceed the
limitations 1 quantity (mass) determined by multi-
plying the process wastewater flow
Max- Max- subject to this subpart times the con-
Effluent characteristics imum imum centrations in the following table.
for for
any (b) Any new source that does not use
monthly
one end-of-pipe biological treatment and is
average
day
subject to this subpart must achieve
BOD5 ...................................................... 64 24 discharges in accordance with § 414.101
TSS ......................................................... 130 40 of this part and also must not exceed
pH ........................................................... (2) (2)
the quantity (mass) determined by
1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter. multiplying the process wastewater
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times. flow subject to this subpart times the
concentrations in the following table.
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57
FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992] NSPS 1
§ 414.22 Effluent limitations rep- Max- Max-
resenting the degree of effluent re- Effluent characteristics imum imum
duction attainable by the applica- for for
tion of the best conventional pollut- any monthly
ant control technology (BCT). [Re- one average
day
served]
BOD5 ...................................................... 64 24
§ 414.23 Effluent limitations rep- TSS ......................................................... 130 40
resenting the degree of effluent re- pH ........................................................... (2) (2)
duction attainable by the applica- 1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter.
tion of the best available tech- 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.
nology economically achievable
(BAT). § 414.25 Pretreatment standards for
(a) The Agency has determined that existing sources (PSES).
for existing point sources whose total Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
OCPSF production defined by § 414.11 is and 403.13, any existing source subject
less than or equal to five (5) million to this subpart which introduces pol-
pounds of OCPSF products per year, lutants into a publicly owned treat-
the BPT level of treatment is the best ment works must comply with 40 CFR
available technology economically part 403 and achieve discharges in ac-
achievable. Accordingly, the Agency is cordance with § 414.111.
not promulgating more stringent BAT [58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993]
limitations for these point sources.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph § 414.26 Pretreatment standards for
(a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30 new sources (PSNS).
through 125.32, any existing point Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
source that uses end-of-pipe biological any new source subject to this subpart
treatment and is subject to this sub- which introduces pollutants into a pub-
part must achieve discharges in accord- licly owned treatment works must
ance with § 414.91 of this part. comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
(c) Except as provided in paragraph achieve discharges in accordance with
(a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30 § 411.111.
through 125.32, any existing point
source that does not use end-of-pipe bi- [58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993]
ological treatment and is subject to
this subpart must achieve discharges in Subpart C—Other Fibers
accordance with § 414.101 of this part.
§ 414.30 Applicability; description of
§ 414.24 New source performance the other fibers subcategory.
standards (NSPS). The provisions of this subpart are ap-
(a) Any new source that uses end-of- plicable to the process wastewater dis-
pipe biological treatment and is sub- charges resulting from the manufac-
ject to this subpart must achieve dis- ture of products classified under SIC
charges in accordance with § 414.91 of 2823 cellulosic man-made fibers, except
224
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00224 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.34
Rayon, and SIC 2824 synthetic organic § 414.32 Effluent limitations rep-
fibers including those fibers and fiber resenting the degree of effluent re-
groups listed below. Product groups are duction attainable by the applica-
indicated with an asterisk (*). tion of the best conventional pollut-
ant control technology (BCT). [Re-
*Acrylic Fibers (85% Polyacrylonitrile) served]
*Cellulose Acetate Fibers
*Fluorocarbon (Teflon) Fibers § 414.33 Effluent limitations rep-
*Modacrylic Fibers resenting the degree of effluent re-
*Nylon 6 Fibers duction attainable by the applica-
Nylon 6 Monofilament tion of the best available tech-
*Nylon 66 Fibers nology economically achievable
(BAT).
Nylon 66 Monofilament
*Polyamide Fibers (Quiana) (a) The Agency has determined that
*Polyaramid (Kevlar) Resin-Fibers for existing point sources whose total
*Polyaramid (Nomex) Resin-Fibers OCPSF production defined by § 414.11 is
*Polyester Fibers less than or equal to five (5) million
*Polyethylene Fibers pounds of OCPSF products per year,
*Polypropylene Fibers the BPT level of treatment is the best
*Polyurethane Fibers (Spandex) available technology economically
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57 achievable. Accordingly, the Agency is
FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992] not promulgating more stringent BAT
limitations for these point sources.
§ 414.31 Effluent limitations rep- (b) Except as provided in paragraph
resenting the degree of effluent re- (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
duction attainable by the applica- through 125.32, any existing point
tion of the best practicable control source that uses end-of-pipe biological
technology currently available treatment and is subject to this sub-
(BPT). part must achieve discharges in accord-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 ance with § 414.91 of this part.
through 125.32, and in 40 CFR 414.11(i) (c) Except as provided in paragraph
for point sources with production in (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
two or more subcategories, any exist- through 125.32, any existing point
ing point source subject to this subpart source that does not use end-of-pipe bi-
must achieve discharges not exceeding ological treatment and is subject to
the quantity (mass) determined by this subpart must achieve discharges in
multiplying the process wastewater accordance with § 414.101 of this part.
flow subject to this subpart times the
§ 414.34 New source performance
concentration listed in the following standards (NSPS).
table.
(a) Any new source that uses end-of-
BPT effluent pipe biological treatment and is sub-
limitations 1 ject to this subpart must achieve dis-
Max- charges in accordance with § 414.91 of
Effluent characteristics Max- this part, and also must not exceed the
imum
imum
for any for quantity (mass) determined by multi-
monthly plying the process wastewater flow
one day average
subject to this subpart times the con-
BOD5 ................................................. 48 18 centrations in the following table.
TSS .................................................... 115 36 (b) Any new source that does not use
pH ...................................................... (2) (2) end-of-pipe biological treatment and is
1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter. subject to this subpart must achieve
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times. discharges in accordance with § 414.101
of this part, and also must not exceed
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57 the quantity (mass) determined by
FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992] multiplying the process wastewater
225
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00225 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.35 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
226
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00226 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.44
*PVC Copolymers, Ethylene-Vinyl Chloride [52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57
*Rosin Derivative Resins FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992]
*Rosin Modified Resins
*Rosin Resins § 414.42 Effluent limitations rep-
*SAN Resins resenting the degree of effluent re-
*Silicones: Silicone Resins duction attainable by the applica-
*Silicones: Silicone Rubbers tion of the best conventional pollut-
*Styrene Maleic Anhydride Resins ant control technology (BCT). [Re-
Styrene Polymeric Residue served]
*Styrene-Acrylic Copolymer Resins
*Styrene-Acrylonitrile-Acrylates Copoly- § 414.43 Effluent limitations rep-
mers resenting the degree of effluent re-
*Styrene-Butadiene Resins duction attainable by the applica-
*Styrene-Butadiene Resins (<50% Butadiene) tion of the best available tech-
*Styrene-Butadiene Resins (latex) nology economically achievable
*Styrene-Divinyl Benzene Resins (Ion Ex- (BAT).
change) (a) The Agency has determined that
*Styrene-Methacrylate Terpolymer Resins for existing point sources whose total
*Styrene-Methyl Methacrylate Copolymers OCPSF production defined by § 414.11 is
*Styrene, Butadiene, Vinyl Toluene less than or equal to five (5) million
Terpolymers
*Sulfonated Styrene-Maleic Anhydride Res-
pounds of OCPSF products per year,
ins the BPT level of treatment is the best
*Unsaturated Polyester Resins available technology economically
*Vinyl Toluene Resins achievable. Accordingly, the Agency is
*Vinyl Toluene-Acrylate Resins not promulgating more stringent BAT
*Vinyl Toluene-Butadiene Resins limitations for these point sources.
*Vinyl Toluene-Methacrylate Resins (b) Except as provided in paragraph
*Vinylacetate-N-Butylacrylate Copolymers (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57 through 125.32, any existing point
FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992] source that uses end-of-pipe biological
treatment and is subject to this sub-
§ 414.41 Effluent limitations rep- part must achieve discharges in accord-
resenting the degree of effluent re- ance with § 414.91 of this part.
duction attainable by the applica- (c) Except as provided in paragraph
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
(BPT). through 125.32, any existing point
source that does not use end-of-pipe bi-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 ological treatment and is subject to
through 125.32, and in 40 CFR 414.11(i) this subpart must achieve discharges in
for point sources with production in accordance with § 414.101 of this part.
two or more subcategories, any exist-
ing point source subject to this subpart § 414.44 New source performance
must achieve discharges not exceeding standards (NSPS).
the quantity (mass) determined by (a) Any new source that uses end-of-
multiplying the process wastewater pipe biological treatment and is sub-
flow subject to this subpart times the ject to this subpart must achieve dis-
concentration listed in the following charges in accordance with § 414.91 of
table. this part, and also must not exceed the
quantity (mass) determined by multi-
BPT Effluent
Limitations 1 plying the process wastewater flow
subject to this subpart times the con-
Max- centrations in the following table.
Max-
Effluent characteristics imum
for imum (b) Any new source that does not use
for end-of-pipe biological treatment and is
any monthly
one subject to this subpart must achieve
average
day discharges in accordance with § 414.101
BOD5 ...................................................... 64 24 of this part, and also must not exceed
TSS ......................................................... 130 40 the quantity (mass) determined by
pH ........................................................... (2) (2) multiplying the process wastewater
1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter. flow subject to this subpart times the
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times. concentrations in the following table.
227
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00227 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.45 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
228
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00228 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.60
not promulgating more stringent BAT part 403 and achieve discharges in ac-
limitations for these point sources. cordance with § 414.111.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph [58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993]
(a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point § 414.56 Pretreatment standards for
source that uses end-of-pipe biological new sources (PSNS).
treatment and is subject to this sub- Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
part must achieve discharges in accord- any new source subject to this subpart
ance with § 414.91 of this part. which introduces pollutants into a pub-
(c) Except as provided in paragraph licly owned treatment works must
(a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30 comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
through 125.32, any existing point achieve discharges in accordance with
source that does not use end-of-pipe bi- § 414.111.
ological treatment and is subject to [58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993]
this subpart must achieve discharges in
accordance with § 414.101 of this part. Subpart F—Commodity Organic
§ 414.54 New source performance Chemicals
standards (NSPS).
§ 414.60 Applicability; description of
(a) Any new source that uses end-of- the commodity organic chemicals
pipe biological treatment and is sub- subcategory.
ject to this subpart must achieve dis- The provisions of this subpart are ap-
charges in accordance with § 414.91 of plicable to the process wastewater dis-
this part, and also must not exceed the charges resulting from the manufac-
quantity (mass) determined by multi- ture of the following SIC 2865 and 2869
plying the process wastewater flow commodity organic chemicals and
subject to this subpart times the con- commodity organic chemical groups.
centrations in the following table. Product groups are indicated with an
(b) Any new source that does not use asterisk (*).
end-of-pipe biological treatment and is (a) Aliphatic Organic Chemicals
subject to this subpart must achieve Acetaldehyde
discharges in accordance with § 414.101 Acetic Acid
of this part, and also must not exceed Acetic Anhydride
the quantity (mass) determined by Acetone
Acrylonitrile
multiplying the process wastewater Adipic Acid
flow subject to this subpart times the *Butylenes (Butenes)
concentrations in the following table. Cyclohexane
Ethanol
NSPS 1 Ethylene
Ethylene Glycol
Max- Ethylene Oxide
Max-
Effluent characteristics imum Formaldehyde
imum for Isopropanol
for any monthly Methanol
one day average
Polyoxypropylene Glycol
BOD5 ................................................. 163 61 Propylene
TSS .................................................... 216 67 Propylene Oxide
pH ...................................................... (2) (2) Vinyl Acetate
1,2-Dichloroethane
1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter. 1,3-Butadiene
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times.
(b) Aromatic Organic Chemicals
§ 414.55 Pretreatment standards for Benzene
existing sources (PSES). Cumene
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 Dimethyl Terephthalate
and 403.13, any existing source subject Ethylbenzene
m-Xylene (impure)
to this subpart which introduces pol- p-Xylene
lutants into a publicly owned treat- Phenol
ment works must comply with 40 CFR *Pitch Tar Residues
229
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00229 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.61 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
*Pyrolysis Gasolines the BPT level of treatment is the best
Styrene available technology economically
Terephthalic Acid achievable. Accordingly, the Agency is
Toluene
*Xylenes, Mixed
not promulgating more stringent BAT
o-Xylene limitations for these point sources.
(b) Except as provided in paragraph
(c) Halogenated Organic Chemicals (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
Vinyl Chloride through 125.32, any existing point
source that uses end-of-pipe biological
treatment and is subject to this sub-
§ 414.61 Effluent limitations rep- part must achieve discharges in accord-
resenting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica- ance with § 414.91 of this part.
tion of the best practicable control (c) Except as provided in paragraph
technology currently available (a) of this section and in 40 CFR 125.30
(BPT). through 125.32, any existing point
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 source that does not use end-of-pipe bi-
ological treatment and is subject to
through 125.32, and in 40 CFR 414.11(i)
this subpart must achieve discharges in
for point sources with production in
accordance with § 414.101 of this part.
two or more subcategories, any exist-
ing point source subject to this subpart § 414.64 New source performance
must achieve discharges not exceeding standards (NSPS)
the quantity (mass) determined by
(a) Any new source that uses end-of-
multiplying the process wastewater
pipe biological treatment and is sub-
flow subject to this subpart times the
ject to this subpart must achieve dis-
concentration listed in the following charges in accordance with § 414.91 of
table. this part, and also must not exceed the
BPT Effluent quantity (mass) determined by multi-
limitations 1 plying the process wastewater flow
subject to this subpart times the con-
Max- centrations in the following table.
Effluent characteristics Max- imum
imum (b) Any new source that does not use
for
for any end-of-pipe biological treatment and is
monthly
one day average subject to this subpart must achieve
BOD5 ................................................. 80 30
discharges in accordance with § 414.101
TSS .................................................... 149 46 of this part, and also must not exceed
pH ...................................................... (2) (2) the quantity (mass) determined by
1 All units except pH are milligrams per liter. multiplying the process wastewater
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0 at all times. flow subject to this subpart times the
concentrations in the following table.
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 57
FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992] NSPS 1
230
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00230 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.70
part 403 and achieve discharges in ac- Diethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether
cordance with § 414.111. *Dimer Acids
Dioxane
[58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993] Ethane
Ethylene Glycol Monophenyl Ether
§ 414.66 Pretreatment standards for *Ethoxylates, Misc.
new sources (PSNS). Ethylene Glycol Dimethyl Ether
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 Ethylene Glycol Monobutyl Ether
Ethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether
any new source subject to this subpart Ethylene Glycol Monomethyl Ether
which introduces pollutants into a pub- Glycerine (Synthetic)
licly owned treatment works must Glyoxal
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and Hexane
achieve discharges in accordance with *Hexanes and Other C6 Hydrocarbons
§ 414.111. Isobutanol
Isobutylene
[58 FR 36892, July 9, 1993] Isobutyraldehyde
Isophorone
Subpart G—Bulk Organic Isophthalic Acid
Isoprene
Chemicals Isopropyl Acetate
Ligninsulfonic Acid, Calcium Salt
§ 414.70 Applicability; description of Maleic Anhydride
the bulk organic chemicals sub- Methacrylic Acid
category. *Methacrylic Acid Esters
The provisions of this subpart are ap- Methane
plicable to the process wastewater dis- Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Methyl Methacrylate
charges resulting from the manufac- Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether
ture of the following SIC 2865 and 2869 Methylisobutyl Ketone
bulk organic chemicals and bulk or- *n-Alkanes
ganic chemical groups. Product groups n-Butyl Alcohol
are indicated with an asterisk (*). n-Butylacetate
(a) Aliphatic Organic Chemicals n-Butyraldehyde
n-Butyric Acid
*Acetic Acid Esters n-Butyric Anhydride
*Acetic Acid Salts *n-Paraffins
Acetone Cyanohydrin n-Propyl Acetate
Acetylene n-Propyl Alcohol
Acrylic Acid Nitrilotriacetic Acid
*Acrylic Acid Esters Nylon Salt
*Alkoxy Alkanols Oxalic Acid
*Alkylates *Oxo Aldehydes—Alcohols
*Alpha-Olefins Pentaerythritol
Butane (all forms) Pentane
*C–4 Hydrocarbons (Unsaturated) *Pentenes
Calcium Stearate *Petroleum Sulfonates
Caprolactam Pine Oil
Carboxymethyl Cellulose Polyoxybutylene Glycol
Cellulose Acetate Butyrates Polyoxyethylene Glycol
*Cellulose Ethers Propane
Cumene Hydroperoxide Propionaldehyde
Cyclohexanol Propionic Acid
Cyclohexanol, Cyclohexanone (Mixed) Propylene Glycol
Cyclohexanone Sec-Butyl Alcohol
Cyclohexene Sodium Formate
*C12–C18 Primary Alcohols Sorbitol
*C5 Concentrates Stearic Acid, Calcium Salt (Wax)
*C9 Concentrates Tert-Butyl Alcohol
Decanol 1-Butene
Diacetone Alcohol 1-Pentene
*Dicarboxylic Acids—Salts 1,4-Butanediol
Diethyl Ether Isobutyl Acetate
Diethylene Glycol 2-Butene (Cis and Trans)
Diethylene Glycol Diethyl Ether 2-Ethyl Hexanol
Diethylene Glycol Dimethyl Ether 2-Ethylbutyraldehyde
Diethylene Glycol Monoethyl Ether 2,2,4-Trimethyl-1,3-Pentanediol
231
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00231 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.70 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
232
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00232 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.75
233
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00233 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.76 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
234
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00234 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.91
235
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00235 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 414.100 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
236
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00236 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 414.111
237
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00237 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 414, App. A 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
238
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00238 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 414, App. A
Fatty amines/Hydrogenation of fatty nitriles Thiuram (dimethyldithiocarbamate)
(batch) hexasulfide/Dimethyldithiocarbamate +
Geraniol/B-Myrcene + Hydrogen chloride, sulfur
esterification of geranyl chloride, hydrol- Triphenylmethane dyes (methyl violet)/Con-
ysis of geranyl acetate densation of Formaldehyde + N-
Furfuryl alcohol/Hydrogenation of furfural Methylaniline + N,N-dimethylaniline, oxi-
Geranial (Citral)/Oxidation of geraniol (cop- dation of reaction product
per catalyst) 4,4′-Bis-(N,N-dimethylaniline) carbinol,
Glyoxal/Oxidation of ethylene glycol Michler’s hydrol/Oxidation of 4,4′-Meth-
Isobutanol/Hydrogenation of ylene-bis(N,N-dimethylaniline) with lead
isobutyraldehyde, Oxo process oxide
Isopropanol/Catalytic hydrogenation of ace- Naphthenic acid salts
tone Stearic acid, metal salts/Neutralization with
2-Mercaptobenzothiazoles, copper salt/2- a metallic base
Mercaptobenzothiazole + copper salt
Methanol/High pressure synthesis from nat- Nickel
ural gas via synthetic gas Acetates, 7,11-Hexadecadien-1-ol
Methanol/Low pressure synthesis from nat- (gossyplure)/Coupling reactions, low pres-
ural gas via synthetic gas sure hydrogenation, esterification
Methyl ethyl ketone/Dehydrogenation of sec- Acetates, 9-dodecen-1-ol (pheromone)/Cou-
Butanol pling reactions, low pressure hydro-
Oxo alcohols, C7–C11/Carbonation & hydro- genation, esterification
genation of C6–C10 olefins Acrylic acid/oxidation of propylene via acro-
Phenol/Liquid phase oxidation of benzoic lein
acid Acrylonitrile/Propylene ammoxidation
Polyoxyalkylene amines/Polyoxyalkylene n-Alkanes/Hydrogenation of C6-C22 alpha
glycol + ammonia olefins (ethylene oligomers)
Polyphenylene oxide/Solution polymeriza- Adiponitrile/Direct cyanation of butadiene
tion of 2,6-xylenol by oxidative coupling Alkyl amines/Amination of alcohols
(cuprous salt catalyst) 4-Aminoacetanilide/Hydrogenation of 4-
Polyoxypropylene diamine/Polypropylene Nitroacetanilide
glycol + Ammonia BTX/Hydrogenation of olefins (cyclohexenes)
Quinaldine (dye intermediate)/Skraup reac- Terphenyls, hydrogenated/Nickel catalyst,
tion of aniline + crotonaldehyde hydrogenation of terphenyl
Silicones, silicone fluids/Hydrolysis and con- Bisphenol-A, hydrogenated
densation of chlorosilanes (Biscyclohexanol-A)/Hydrogenation of
Silicones, silicone rubbers/Hydrolysis and Bisphenol-A
condensation of chlorosilanes Butadiene (1,3)/Extractive distillation of C–4
Silicones, silicone specialties (grease, disper- pyrolyzates
sion agents, defoamers & other products) n-Butanol/Hydrogenation of n-
Silicones: Silicone resins/Hydrolysis & con- Butyraldehyde, Oxo process
densation of methyl, phenyl & vinyl 1,3-Butylene glycol/Hydrogenation of
chlorosilanes acetaldol
Silicones: Silicone fluids/Hydrolysis of 1,4-Butanediol/Hydrogenation of 1,4-
chlorosilanes to acyclic & cyclic butynediol
organosiloxanes Butylenes (mixed)/Distillation pf C4
Styrene/Dehydration of a-Methylbenzyl alco- pyrolyzates
hol (coproduct of propylene oxide) 4-Chloro-2-aminophenol/Hydrogenation of 4-
Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)/ Chloro-2-nitrophenol
Oxyhydrochlorination of tetrachloroethane Lilial (hydroxydihydrocitronellal)/Hydration
Tris(anilino)s-triazine/Cyanuric chloride + and oxidation of citronellol
aniline + cogeners Cycloparaffins/Catalytic hydrogenation of
Trichloroethylene/Oxyhydrochlorination of aromatics in kerosene solvent
tetrachloroethane Cyclohexanol/Hydrogenation of phenol, dis-
Unsaturated polyester resin/Reaction of ma- tillation
leic anhydride + phthalic anhydride + pro- Cyclohexanone/From phenol via
pylene glycol polyester with styrene or cyclohexanol by hydrogenation-dehydro-
methyl methacrylate genation
Dialkyldithiocarbamates, metal salts/
Lead
Dialkylamines + carbon disulfide
Alkyd resin/Condensation polymerization Ethylamine/Reductive amination of ethanol
Alkyd resins/Condensation polymerization of Ethylamines (mono, di, tri)/Reductive
phthalic anhydride + glycerin + vegetable ammination (ammonia + hydrogen) of eth-
oil esters anol
Dialkydithiocarbamates, metal salts/ Isoeugenol, high % trans/Separation of
Dialkylamines + carbon disulfide mixed cis & trans isoeugenols
239
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00239 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 414, App. A 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
2-Ethylhexanol/from n-Butyraldehyde by Toluene diamine (mixture)/Catalytic hydro-
Aldol condensation and hydrogenation genation of dinitrotoluene
Fatty acids, hydrogenated/tallow & coco Methylated urea-formaldehyde resins (tex-
acids + Hydrogen tile)/Methylation of urea-formaldehyde
Fatty amines/Hydrogenation of fatty nitriles adduct
(batch) Methylated urea-formaldehyde glyoxol (tex-
Fatty amines/Hydrogenation of tallow & tile resin)/Reaction of methylated urea-
coco nitriles formaldehyde + glyoxal
Glyoxal-urea formaldehyde textile resin/con-
densation to N-bis(hydroxymethyl) ureas & Zinc
N,N′-(dihydroxyethyl) ureas Methylhydroabietate, diels-alder adducts/De-
11-hexadecenal/Coupling rxns, low pressure rivatives of abietic esters from rosin
hydrogenation Acrylic resins/Emulsion or solution polym-
Hexahydrophthalic anhydride/Condensation erization to coatings
of butadiene & maleic anhydride (Diels- Acrylic resins (latex)/Emulsion polymeriza-
Alder reaction) + hydrogenation tion of acrylonitrile with polybutadiene
Isobutanol/Hydrogenation of Acrylic fibers (85% polyacrylonitrile) by so-
isobutyraldehyde, Oxo process lution polymerization/Wet spinning
Diisobutyl amine/Ammonolysis of isobutanol Alkyd Resins/Condensation polymerization
Isopropyl amines (mono, di)/Reductive of phthalic anhydride + glycerin + vege-
ammination (Ammonia + Hydrogen) of table oil esters
isopropanol Benzene/By-product of styrene by
Linalool/Pyrolysis of 2-Pinanol ethylbenzene dehydrogenation
Methanol/High pressure synthesis from nat- Benzene/By-product of vinyl toluene (from
ural gas via synthetic gas ethyltoluene)
Methanol/Low pressure sythesis fron natural n-butyl alcohol/Hydrogenation of n-
gas via synthetic gas Butyraldehyde, Oxo process
Methanol/Butane oxidation Coumarin (benz-a-pyrone)/Salicylaldehyde,
Tris-(hydroxymethyl) methyl amine/Hydro- Oxo process
genation of tris(hydroxymethyl) Cycloparaffins/Catalytic hydrogenation of
nitromethane aromatics in kerosene solvent
N-Methyl morpholine/Morpholine + Meth- Dithiocarbamates, zinc salt/Reaction of zinc
anol oxide + Sodium dithiocarbamates
N-Ethyl morpholine/Morpholine + Ethanol Dialkyldithiocarbamates, metal salts/
2-Methyl-7,8-epoxy octadecane/Coupling re- Diakylamines + Carbon disulfide
actions, low pressure hydrogenation, Dithiocarbamates, metal salts/
epoxidation Dithiocarbamic acid + metal oxide
Alpha-Olefins/Ethylene oligomer, & Zeigler Thiuram (dimethyldithiocarbamate)
Cat. hexasulfide/Dimethyldithiocarbamate +
Petroleum hydrocarbon resins, hydro- sulfur
genated/Hydrogenation of petroleum hy- Fluorescent brighteners/Coumarin based
drocarbon resin products Ethyl acetate/Redox reaction (Tschenko) of
Pinane/Hydrogenation of A-Pinene acetaldehyde
2-Pinanol/Reduction of pinane hydroperoxide Ethylbenzene/Benzene alkylation in liquid
Bis-(p-Octylphenol) sulfide, Nickel salt/p- phase
Octylphenol + sulfur chloride (S2C12), neu- Ethylbenzyl chloride/Chloromethylation
tralize with Nickel base (Hydrogen chloride + formaldehyde, zinc
Piperazine/Reductive amination of ethanol chloride) of ethylbenzene
amine (ammonia & hydrogenation, metal 2-Ethyl hexanol/Aldol condensation-hydro-
catalyst) genation of n-Butyraldehyde
N,N-Dimethylpiperazine/Condensation piper- Glyoxal-urea formaldehyde textile resin/Con-
azine + formaldehyde, hydrogenation densation to N-bis (hydroxymethyl) ureas
Polyoxylalkylene amines/Polyoxyalkylene + N,N′-(Dihydroxyethyl) ureas
glycol + Ammonia Isobutanol/Hydrogenation of
Polyoxypropylene diamine/Polypropylene isobutyraldehyde, Oxo process
glycol + Ammonia Isopropanol/Catalytic hydrogenation of ace-
2-Amino-2-methyl-1-propanol/Hydrogenation tone
of 2-Nitro 2-methyl-1-propanol Methallylidene diacetate/Condensation of 2-
3-Methoxypropyl amine/Reductive amination Methypropenal + acetic anhydride
of acrylamide with methanol & hydrogen Methanol/Low pressure sythesis from nat-
N-Propylamine/Reductive ammination (am- ural gas via synthetic gas
monia + hydrogen) of n-propanol Methyl chloride/Hydrochlorination of meth-
Sorbitol/Hydrogenation of sugars anol
Sulfolane/Condensation butadiene + sulfur Methylethyl ketone/Dehydrogenation of sec-
dioxide, Hydrogenation Butanol
Thionocarbamates, N-Ethyl-o-isopropyl/Iso- Naphthenic acid salts
propyl xanthate + Ethylamine Nylon
240
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00240 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 414, App. B
Nylon 6 & 66 copolymers/Polycondensation of Disperse dyes, Azo and Vat
Nylon salt + Caprolatam Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid/Ethylene-
Nylon 6 fiber/Extrusion (melt spinning) diamine + Formaldehyde + Sodium cyanide
Oxo alcohols, C12-C15/Hydroformylation & Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid/
hydrogenation of C11-C14 olefins Diethylenetriamine + Formaldehyde + So-
Phenolic urethan resins/Phenol + excess dium cyanide
formaldehyde + Methylene aniline N,N′-bis(o-
diisocyanate Acetamidophenol)ethylenediamine, ferric
Polystyrene (crystal) modified/Polystyrene + complex/ Salicyladehyde + Ethylene-
sulfonation, chloromethylation and/or diamine + Hydrogen cyanide, hydrolysis to
amination amide
Rayon/Viscose process Diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid,
SAN resin/Emulsion polymerization pentasodium salt/Diethylenetriamine
Silicones: Silicone rubbers/Hydrolysis and pentaacetic acide + caustic
condensation of chlorosilanes Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, metal
Silicones: Silicone specialties (grease, dis- salts/Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid +
persion agents, defoamers & other prod- metal bases
ucts) Hydroxyethyl ethylenediamine triacetic
Silicones: Silicone resins/Hydrolysis & con- acid, trisodium salt/ Ethylenediamine +
densation of methyl, phenyl & vinyl Ethylene oxide + Formaldehyde + Sodium
chlorosilanes cyanide, hydrolysis
Silicones: Silicone fluids/Hydrolysis of 5,5-Dimethyl hyantoin/Acetone + ammonia +
chlorosilanes to acyclic & cyclic carbon dioxide + hydrogen cyanide
organosiloxanes Hydrogen cyanide/By-product of acrylo-
Stearic acid, metal salts/Neutralization with nitrile by ammoxidation of propylene
a metallic base Iminodiacetic acid/Hexamethylene
Styrene/Dehydrogenation of ethylbenzene tetraamine + Hydrogen cyanide, hydrolysis
Styrene-butadiene resin/Emulsion polym- of iminoacetonitrile salt
erization Methionine/Acrolein + Methyl mercaptan,
Vinyl acetate/Reduction of acetylene + ace- with hydrogen cyanide and ammonium car-
tic acid bonate
Vinyl toluene/Dehydrogenation (thermal) of Nitrilotriacetic acid/Hexamethylene
ethyltoluene tetraamine + Hydrogen cyanide, hydrolysis
Xylenes, mixed/By-product vinyl toluene of nitrilotriacetonitrile salt
(from ethyltoluene) Picolines, mixed/Condensation of acetal-
dehyde + formaldehyde + ammonia
Cyanide
Organic pigments, Azo/Diazotization of ani-
Acetone cyanohydrin/Acetone + Hydrogen line cogener, coupling to B-Napthol
cyanide Pyrimidines, 2-Isopropyl-4-methoxy-/
Acetonitrile/By-product of acrylonitrile from Isobutyronitrile + methanol, ammonia and
propylene by ammoxidation methylacetoacetate (ring closure)
Acrylic resins/Solution polymerization Pyridine (synthetic)/Condensation of acetal-
Acrylic fiber (85% acrylonitrile)/Suspension dehyde + ammonia + formaldehyde
polymerization, and wet spinning Cyanopyridine/Ammoxidation of picoline
Acrylic fiber (85% acrylonitrile)/Solution po- Sarcosine (N-Methyl glycine), sodium salt/
lymerization, and wet spinning Hexamethylene tetraamine + Sodium cya-
Acrylonitrile/Ammoxidation of propylene nide, hydrolysis
Adiponitrile/Butadiene + Hydrogen cyanide Thiophene acetic acid/Chloromethylation
(direct cyanation) (Hydrogen chloride + Formaldehyde) + So-
Allylnitrile/Allyl chloride + Sodium cyanide dium cyanide, hydrolysis
Dimethoxybenzaldehyde/Hydroquinone di- Tris(anilino)S-triazine/Cyanuric chloride +
methyl ether + Hydrogen cyanide, hydrol- Aniline and its cogeners
ysis Triethylorthoformate/Ethanol + Hydrogen
Benzyl cyanide/Benzyl chloride + Sodium cy- cyanide
anide Trimethylorthoformate/Methanol + Hydro-
Coal tar products/Distillation of coal tar gen cyanide
condensate
Cyanoacetic acid/Chloracetic acid + sodium [52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 54
cyanide FR 27352, June 29, 1989; 55 FR 26692, June 29,
Cyanuric chloride/Catalyzed trimerization of 1990; 57 FR 41844, Sept. 11, 1992]
cyanogen chloride
Vat dyes, Indigo paste as Vat Blue 1/Sodam- APPENDIX B TO PART 414—COMPLEXED
ide + potassium N-Phenylglycine, fused METAL-BEARING WASTE STREAMS
with caustic/N-phenylglycine + Aniline +
Chromium
Formaldehyde + Sodium bisulfite, sodium
cyanide, hydrolysis with potassium hy- Azo dye intermediates/Substituted diazo-
droxide nium salts + coupling compounds
241
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00241 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8002 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 415 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Vat dyes Subpart B—Aluminum Sulfate Production
Acid dyes Subcategory
Azo dyes, metallized/Azo dye + metal acetate
Acid dyes, Azo (including metallized) 415.20 Applicability; description of the alu-
Organic pigments, miscellaneous lakes and minum sulfate production subcategory.
toners 415.21 Specialized definitions. [Reserved]
415.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Copper resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Disperse dyes attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently
Acid dyes
available (BPT).
Direct dyes
415.23 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Vat dyes
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Sulfur dyes attainable by the application of the best
Disperse dye coupler/N-substitution of 2- available technology economically
Amino-4-acetamidoanisole achievable (BAT).
Azo dyes, metallized/Azo dye + metal acetate 415.24 Pretreatment standards for existing
Direct dyes, Azo sources (PSES).
Disperse dyes, Azo and Vat 415.25 New source performance standards
Organic pigment Green 7/Copper (NSPS).
phthalocyanine 415.26 Pretreatment standards for new
Organic pigments sources (PSNS).
Organic pigments/Phthalocyanine pigments
Organic pigments/Copper phthalocyanine Subpart C—Calcium Carbide Production
(Blue Crude) Subcategory
Organic pigments, miscellaneous lakes and
toners 415.30 Applicability; description of the cal-
cium carbide production subcategory.
Lead 415.31 Specialized definitions. [Reserved]
Organic pigments, Quinacridines 415.32 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Organic pigments, Thioindigoids resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Tetraethyl lead/Alkyl halide + sodium-lead
practicable control technology currently
alloy
available (BPT).
Tetramethyl lead/Alkyl halide + sodium-lead
415.33 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
alloy
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Nickel attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically
Azo dyes, metallized/Azo dye + metal acetate achievable (BAT).
415.34 [Reserved]
Zinc
415.35 New source performance standards
Organic pigments/Azo pigments by (NSPS).
diazotization and coupling 415.36 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS).
[52 FR 42568, Nov. 5, 1987, as amended at 54
FR 27352, June 29, 1989; 57 FR 41844, Sept. 11, Subpart D—Calcium Chloride Production
1992]
Subcategory
242
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00242 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 415
243
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00243 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 415 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
415.124 Pretreatment standards for existing 415.163 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources (PSES). resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.125 New source performance standards attainable by the application of the best
(NSPS). available technology economically
415.126 Pretreatment standards for new achievable (BAT).
sources (PSNS). 415.164 [Reserved]
415.165 New source performance standards
Subpart M—Potassium Sulfate Production (NSPS).
Subcategory 415.166 Pretreatment standards for new
sources (PSNS).
415.130 Applicability; description of the po-
tassium sulfate production subcategory. Subpart Q—Sodium Dichromate and
415.131 Specialized definitions. [Reserved] Sodium Sulfate Production Subcategory
415.132 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.170 Applicability; description of the so-
attainable by the application of the best dium dichromate and sodium sulfate pro-
practicable control technology currently duction subcategory.
available (BPT). 415.171 Specialized definitions.
415.133 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.172 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically practicable control technology currently
achievable (BAT). available (BPT).
415.134 [Reserved] 415.173 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
415.135 New source performance standards resenting the degree of effluent reduction
(NSPS). attainable by the application of the best
415.136 Pretreatment standards for new available technology economically
sources (PSNS). achievable (BAT).
415.174 [Reserved]
Subpart N—Sodium Bicarbonate 415.175 New source performance standards
Production Subcategory (NSPS).
415.176 Pretreatment standards for new
415.140 Applicability; description of the so- sources (PSNS).
dium bicarbonate production sub- 415.177 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
category. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.141 Specialized definitions. [Reserved] attainable by the application of the best
415.142 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- conventional pollutant control tech-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction nology (BCT).
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently Subpart R—Sodium Metal Production
available (BPT). Subcategory [Reserved]
415.143 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subpart S—Sodium Silicate Production
attainable by the application of the best Subcategory [Reserved]
available technology economically
achievable (BAT). Subpart T—Sodium Sulfite Production
415.144 [Reserved] Subcategory
415.145 New source performance standards
(NSPS). 415.200 Applicability; description of the so-
415.146 Pretreatment standards for new dium sulfite production subcategory.
sources (PSNS). 415.201 Specialized definitions.
415.202 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subpart O—Sodium Carbonate Production resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subcategory [Reserved] attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently
Subpart P—Sodium Chloride Production available (BPT).
Subcategory 415.203 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.160 Applicability; description of the so- attainable by the application of the best
dium chloride production subcategory. available technology economically
415.161 Specialized definitions. achievable (BAT).
415.162 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.204 [Reserved]
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.205 New source performance standards
attainable by the application of the best (NSPS).
practicable control technology currently 415.206 Pretreatment standards for new
available (BPT). sources (PSNS).
244
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00244 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 415
415.207 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart X—Ammonium Chloride
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Production Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- 415.240 Applicability; description of the am-
nology (BCT). monium chloride production sub-
category.
Subpart U—Sulfuric Acid Production 415.241 Specialized definitions.
Subcategory [Reserved] 415.242 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subpart V—Titanium Dioxide Production attainable by the application of the best
Subcategory practicable control technology currently
available (BPT).
415.220 Applicability; description of the ti-
tanium dioxide production subcategory. Subpart Y—Ammonium Hydroxide
415.221 Specialized definitions. Production Subcategory [Reserved]
415.222 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subpart Z—Barium Carbonate Production
attainable by the application of the best Subcategory [Reserved]
practicable control technology currently
available (BPT). Subpart AA—Borax Production
415.223 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 415.270 Applicability; description of the
available technology economically borax production subcategory.
achievable (BAT). 415.271 Specialized definitions. [Reserved]
415.224 [Reserved] 415.272 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
415.225 New source performance standards resenting the degree of effluent reduction
(NSPS). attainable by the application of the best
415.226 Pretreatment standards for new practicable control technology currently
sources (PSNS). available (BPT).
415.227 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.273–415.275 [Reserved]
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.276 Pretreatment standards for new
attainable by the application of the best sources (PSNS).
conventional pollutant control tech-
nology (BCT). Subpart AB—Boric Acid Production
Subcategory
Subpart W—Aluminum Fluoride Production
Subcategory 415.280 Applicability; description of the
boric acid production subcategory.
415.230 Applicability; description of the alu- 415.281 Specialized definitions.
minum fluoride production subcategory. 415.282 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
415.231 Specialized definitions. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.232 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction practicable control technology currently
attainable by the application of the best available (BPT).
practicable control technology currently
available (BPT). Subpart AC—Bromine Production
415.233 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 415.290 Applicability; description of the bro-
available technology economically mine production subcategory.
achievable (BAT). 415.291 Specialized definitions. [Reserved]
415.234 [Reserved] 415.292 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
415.235 New source performance standards resenting the degree of effluent reduction
(NSPS). attainable by the application of the best
415.236 [Reserved] practicable control technology currently
415.237 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- available (BPT).
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.293–415.295 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best 415.296 Pretreatment standards for new
conventional pollutant control tech- sources (PSNS).
nology (BCT).
245
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00245 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 415 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
246
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00246 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 415
415.386 Pretreatment standards for new 415.432 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources (PSNS). resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Subpart AM—Ferrous Sulfate Production practicable control technology currently
Subcategory [Reserved] available (BPT).
415.433–415.435 [Reserved]
Subpart AN—Fluorine Production 415.436 Pretreatment standards for new
Subcategory sources (PSNS).
247
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00247 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 415 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
conventional pollutant control tech- Subpart BB—Sodium Bisulfite Production
nology (BCT). Subcategory
Subpart AV—Strong Nitric Acid Production 415.540 Applicability; description of the so-
Subcategory [Reserved] dium bisulfite production subcategory.
415.541 Specialized definitions.
Subpart AW—Oxygen and Nitrogen 415.542 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Production Subcategory attainable by the application of the best
415.490 Applicability; description of the oxy- practicable control technology currently
gen and nitrogen production sub- available (BPT).
415.543 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
category.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.491 Specialized definitions. [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best
415.492 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- available technology economically
resenting the degree of effluent reduction achievable (BAT).
attainable by the application of the best 415.544 [Reserved]
practicable control technology currently 415.545 New source performance standards
available (BPT). (NSPS).
415.546 Pretreatment standards for new
Subpart AX—Potassium Chloride sources (PSNS).
Production Subcategory 415.547 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.500 Applicability; description of the po- attainable by the application of the best
tassium chloride production subcategory. conventional pollutant control tech-
415.501 Specialized definitions. [Reserved] nology (BCT).
415.502 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subpart BC—Sodium Fluoride Production
attainable by the application of the best Subcategory
practicable control technology currently
available (BPT). 415.550 Applicability; description of the so-
dium fluoride production subcategory.
415.503–415.505 [Reserved]
415.551 Specialized definitions.
415.506 Pretreatment standards for new 415.552 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources (PSNS). resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Subpart AY—Potassium Iodide Production practicable control technology currently
Subcategory available (BPT).
415.553 [Reserved]
415.510 Applicability; description of the po- 415.554 Pretreatment standards for existing
tassium iodide production subcategory. sources (PSES).
415.511 Specialized definitions. 415.555 [Reserved]
415.512 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.556 Pretreatment standards for new
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources (PSNS).
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently Subpart BD—Sodium Hydrosulfide
available (BPT). Production Subcategory [Reserved]
248
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00248 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 415
practicable control technology currently 415.653 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available (BPT). resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.603–415.605 [Reserved] attainable by the application of the best
415.606 Pretreatment standards for new available technology economically
sources (PSNS). achievable (BAT).
415.654 Pretreatment standards for existing
Subpart BI—Sulfur Dioxide Production sources (PSES).
Subcategory [Reserved] 415.655 New source performance standards
(NSPS).
Subpart BJ—Zinc Oxide Production 415.656 Pretreatment standards for new
Subcategory [Reserved] sources (PSNS).
415.657 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subpart BK—Zinc Sulfate Production resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subcategory attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech-
415.630 Applicability; description of the zinc nology (BCT).
sulfate production subcategory.
415.631 Specialized definitions. Subpart BN—Sodium Chlorate Production
415.632 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 415.660 Applicability; description of the so-
practicable control technology currently dium chlorate production subcategory.
available (BPT). 415.661 Specialized definitions.
415.633–415.635 [Reserved] 415.662 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
415.636 Pretreatment standards for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources (PSNS). attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently
Subpart BL—Cadmium Pigments and Salts available (BPT).
Production Subcategory 415.663 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
415.640 Applicability; description of the cad- attainable by the application of the best
mium pigments and salts production sub- available technology economically
category. achievable (BAT).
415.641 Specialized definitions. 415.664 Pretreatment standards for existing
415.642 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources (PSES). [Reserved]
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.665 New source performance standards
attainable by the application of the best (NSPS).
practicable control technology currently 415.666 Pretreatment standards for new
available (BPT). sources (PSNS).
415.643 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.667 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically conventional pollutant control tech-
achievable (BAT). nology (BCT).
415.644 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES). Subpart BO—Zinc Chloride Production
415.645 New source performance standards Subcategory
(NSPS).
415.646 Pretreatment standards for new 415.670 Applicability; description of the zinc
sources (PSNS). chloride production subcategory.
415.647 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 415.671 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.672 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
conventional pollutant control tech- attainable by the application of the best
nology (BCT). practicable control technology currently
available (BPT).
Subpart BM—Cobalt Salts Production 415.673 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subcategory resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
415.650 Applicability; description of the co- available technology economically
balt salts production subcategory. achievable (BAT).
415.651 Specialized definitions. 415.674 Pretreatment standards for existing
415.652 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- sources (PSES).
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 415.675 New source performance standards
attainable by the application of the best (NSPS).
practicable control technology currently 415.676 Pretreatment standards for new
available (BPT). sources (PSNS).
249
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00249 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.01 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
415.677 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- § 415.11 Specialized definitions. [Re-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction served]
attainable by the application of the best
conventional pollutant control tech- §§ 415.12–415.13 [Reserved]
nology (BCT).
§ 415.14 Pretreatment standards for
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b), (c), (e), and existing sources (PSES).
(g), 306 (b) and (c), 307 (b) and (c), and 501 of
the Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pol- Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
lution Control Act Amendments of 1972, as and 403.13, any existing source subject
amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977) (the to this subpart which introduces pol-
‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314 (b), (c), (e), and lutants into a publicly owned treat-
(g), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317 (b) and (c), and 1361; ment works must comply with 40 CFR
86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. part 403 and achieve the following
L. 95–217. pretreatment standards for existing
SOURCE: 47 FR 28278, June 29, 1982, unless sources (PSES):
otherwise noted.
SUBPART A—ALUMINUM CHLORIDE
250
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00250 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.24
251
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00251 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.25 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
252
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00252 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.52
253
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00253 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.53 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
254
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00254 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.63
255
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00255 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.64 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
256
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00256 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.82
§ 415.66 Pretreatment standards for tions for Lead(T) are the same as speci-
new sources (PSNS). fied in § 415.65(b).
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR [47 FR 28278, June 29, 1982, as amended at 47
403.7, any new source subject to this FR 55226, Dec. 8, 1982]
subpart and using the mercury cell § 415.67 Effluent limitations guidelines
process, which introduces pollutants representing the degree of effluent
into a publicly owned treatment works, reduction attainable by the applica-
must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and tion of the best conventional pollut-
achieve the following Pretreatment ant control technology (BCT).
Standards for New Sources (PSNS): (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
SUBPART F—CHLOR-ALKALI-MERCURY CELLS source subject to this subpart and
using the mercury cell process must
PSNS effluent
limitations achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu-
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 cation of the best conventional pollut-
day consecu-
tive days ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
itations are the same for TSS and pH
Milligrams per liter as specified in § 415.62(a).
(b) [Reserved]
Mercury (T) .................................... 0.11 0.048
257
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00257 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.83 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum for daily values Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days secutive days
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
lb) of product lb) of product
258
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00258 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.92
the electrolytic process and by the oxi- gate the effects of such contact once it
dation of alkyl hydroanthraquinones. has occurred.
§ 415.91 Specialized definitions. § 415.92 Effluent limitations guidelines
For the purpose of this subpart: representing the degree of effluent
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control
eral definitions, abbreviations and
technology currently available
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR (BPT).
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term product shall mean hy- (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
drogen peroxide as a one hundred per- 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
cent hydrogen peroxide solution. source subject to this subpart and man-
(c) The term Cyanide A shall mean ufacturing hydrogen peroxide by the
those cyanides amenable to oxidation of alkyl
chlorination and is determined by the hydroanthraquinones must achieve the
methods specified in 40 CFR 136.3. following effluent limitations rep-
(d) The term process wastewater resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
means any water which, during manu- tion attainable by the application of
facturing or processing, comes into di- the best practicable control technology
rect contact with or results from the currently available (BPT):
production or use of any raw material,
intermediate product, finished product, SUBPART I—HYDROGEN PEROXIDE ORGANIC
by-product, or waste product. The term PROCESS
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include
contaminated non-process wastewater, BPT limitations
as defined below. Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
(e) The term process wastewater pollut- Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
ants means pollutants present in proc- secutive days
ess wastewater.
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
(f) The term contaminated nonprocess lb) of product
wastewater shall mean any water
which, during manufacturing or proc- TSS ........................................ 0.80 0.40
essing, comes into incidental contact TOC ....................................... 0.44 0.22
with any raw material, intermediate pH .......................................... (1) (1)
product, finished product, by-product 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
or waste product by means of (1) rain-
fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac- (b) Except as provided in 40 CFR
cidental leaks caused by the failure of 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
process equipment, which are repaired source subject to this subpart and man-
within the shortest reasonable time ufacturing hydrogen peroxide by the
not to exceed 24 hours after discovery; electrolytic process must achieve the
and (4) discharges from safety showers following effluent limitations rep-
and related personal safety equipment: resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
Provided, that all reasonable measures tion attainable by the application of
have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce the best practicable control technology
and control such contact to the max- currently available (BPT):
imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti-
259
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00259 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.110 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
260
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00260 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.132
261
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00261 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.133 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
262
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00262 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.162
263
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00263 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.163 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
using the solution brine mining process ards (NSPS): There shall be no dis-
must achieve the following effluent charge of process wastewater pollut-
limitations representing the degree of ants to navigable waters, except that
effluent reduction attainable by the ap- unused bitterns may be returned to the
plication of the best practicable con- body of water from which the process
trol technology currently available brine solution was originally with-
(BPT): drawn, provided no additional pollut-
SUBPART P—SODIUM CHLORIDE BRINE MINING ants are added to the bitterns during
PROCESS the production of sodium chloride.
(b) Any new source subject to this
BPT limitations subpart and using the solution brine-
Pollutant or pollutant property Average of mining process must achieve the fol-
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- lowing new source performance stand-
secutive days ards (NSPS): There shall be no dis-
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
charge of process wastewater pollut-
lb.) of product ants to navigable waters.
264
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00264 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.177
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
SUBPART Q—SODIUM DICHROMATE Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
BPT limitations tive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Milligrams per liter
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days Chromium (T) ................................ 1.0 0.50
Hexavalent Chromium ................... 0.11 0.060
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
lb) of product Nickel (T) ....................................... 0.80 0.40
265
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00265 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.200 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property TSS ........................................ 0.032 0.016
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- Chromium (T) ........................ 0.0020 0.00063
secutive days Zinc (T) .................................. 0.0051 0.0015
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 COD ....................................... 3.4 1.7
lb) of product pH .......................................... (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
TSS ........................................ 0.032 0.016
COD ....................................... 3.4 1.7
pH .......................................... (1) (1) [49 FR 33421, Aug. 22, 1984]
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
§ 415.206 Pretreatment standards for
new sources (PSNS).
§ 415.203 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef- Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
fluent reduction attainable by the any new source subject to this subpart
application of the best available which introduces pollutants into a pub-
technology economically achievable
(BAT). licly owned treatment works must
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 achieve the following pretreatment
through 125.32, any existing point
standards for new sources (PSNS).
source subject to this subpart must
266
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00266 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.222
[49 FR 33421, Aug. 22, 1984] Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
lb) of product
Subpart U—Sulfuric Acid Produc-
TSS ........................................ 140 38
tion Subcategory [Reserved] Chromium (T) ........................ 0.48 0.21
Nickel (T) ............................... 0.29 0.14
Subpart V—Titanium Dioxide pH .......................................... 1
( ) 1
( )
267
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00267 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.223 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
§ 415.223 Effluent limitations guide- Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
lines representing the degree of ef- any 1 day for 30 con-
fluent reduction attainable by the secutive days
application of the best available
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
technology economically achievable lb) of product
(BAT).
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR TSS ........................................ 110 30
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point Iron (T) ................................... 4.1 1.2
source subject to this subpart and pro- Chromium (T) ........................ 0.27 0.14
Nickel (T) ............................... 0.18 0.095
ducing titanium dioxide by the sulfate pH .......................................... (1) (1)
process must achieve the following ef- 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
fluent limitations representing the de-
gree of effluent reduction attainable by (b) Any new source subject to this
the application of the best available subpart producing titanium dioxide by
technology economically achievable the chloride process must achieve the
268
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00268 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.226
269
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00269 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.227 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
270
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00270 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.242
271
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00271 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.270 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
272
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00272 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.302
source subject to this subpart and brine solution was originally with-
using remined borax must achieve the drawn.
following effluent limitations rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc- §§ 415.293–415.295 [Reserved]
tion attainable by the application of
the best practicable control technology § 415.296 Pretreatment standards for
currently available (BPT): new sources (PSNS).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
SUBPART AB—BORIC ACID MINED BORAX any new source subject to this subpart
PROCESS which introduces pollutants into a pub-
BPT limitations licly owned treatment works must
Average of
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
Pollutant or pollutant property achieve the following pretreatment
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- standards for new sources (PSNS): The
secutive days
limitations are the same as specified in
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 § 415.292.
lb) of product
[49 FR 33421, Aug. 22, 1984]
Arsenic ................................... 0.0028 0.0014
TSS ........................................ 0.14 0.07
pH .......................................... (1) (1) Subpart AD—Calcium Carbonate
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. Production Subcategory
§ 415.300 Applicability; description of
Subpart AC—Bromine Production the calcium carbonate production
Subcategory subcategory.
§ 415.290 Applicability; description of The provisions of this subpart are ap-
the bromine production sub- plicable to discharges resulting from
category. the production of calcium carbonate by
The provisions of this subpart are ap- the milk of lime process and by the re-
plicable to discharges resulting from covery process from Solvay process
the production of bromine by the brine- wastes.
mining process and by the Trona proc-
§ 415.301 Specialized definitions.
ess.
(a) Except as provided below, the gen-
§ 415.291 Specialized definitions. [Re- eral definitions, abbreviations and
served] methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
§ 415.292 Effluent limitations guide- part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
lines representing the degree of ef- (b) The term product shall mean cal-
fluent reduction attainable by the cium carbonate.
application of the best practicable
control technology currently avail- § 415.302 Effluent limitations guide-
able (BPT). lines representing the degree of ef-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable
through 125.32, any existing point control technology currently avail-
source subject to this subpart must able (BPT).
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
ent reduction attainable by the appli- 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
cation of the best practicable control source subject to this subpart and
technology currently available (BPT): using the milk of lime process must
There shall be no discharge of process achieve the following effluent limita-
wastewater pollutants to navigable wa- tions representing the degree of efflu-
ters, except that residual brine and de- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
pleted liquor may be returned to the cation of the best practicable control
body of water from which the process technology currently available (BPT):
273
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00273 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.310 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
274
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00274 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.341
standards for new sources (PSNS): The Provided, that all reasonable measures
limitations are the same as specified in have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce
§ 415.312. and control such contact to the max-
imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti-
[49 FR 33421, Aug. 22, 1984]
gate the effects of such contact once it
has occurred.
Subpart AF—Carbon Dioxide Pro-
duction Subcategory [Re- § 415.332 Effluent limitations guide-
served] lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable
Subpart AG—Carbon Monoxide control technology currently avail-
and By-Product Hydrogen able (BPT).
Production Subcategory Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point
§ 415.330 Applicability; description of source subject to this subpart must
the carbon monoxide and by-prod-
uct hydrogen production sub- achieve the following effluent limita-
category. tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
The provisions of this subpart are ap- cation of the best practicable control
plicable to discharges resulting from technology currently available (BPT):
the production of carbon monoxide and
by-product hydrogen by the reforming SUBPART AG—CARBON MONOXIDE
process.
BPT limitations
§ 415.331 Specialized definitions. Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
For the purpose of this subpart: any 1 day for 30 con-
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- secutive days
eral definitions, abbreviations and Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR lb) of product
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term product shall mean car- COD ....................................... 0.50 0.25
bon monoxide plus hydrogen. TSS ........................................ 0.12 0.060
pH .......................................... (1) (1)
(c) The term process wastewater
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
means any water which, during manu-
facturing or processing, comes into di-
rect contact with or results from the Subpart AH—Chrome Pigments
production or use of any raw material, Production Subcategory
intermediate product, finished product,
by-product, or waste product. The term § 415.340 Applicability; description of
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include the chrome pigments production
contaminated nonprocess wastewater, subcategory.
as defined below. This subpart applies to discharges to
(d) The term process wastewater pol- waters of the United States and intro-
lutants means pollutants present in duction of pollutants into publicly
process wastewater. owned treatment works resulting from
(e) The term contaminated nonprocess the production of chrome pigments.
wastewater shall mean any water
which, during manufacturing or proc- § 415.341 Specialized definitions.
essing, comes into incidental contact For the purposes of this subpart:
with any raw material, intermediate (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
product, finished product, by-product eral definitions, abbreviations and
or waste product by means of (1) rain- methods of analysis set forth in part
fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac- 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
cidental leaks caused by the failure of subpart.
process equipment, which are repaired (b) The term chrome pigments means
within the shortest reasonable time chrome yellow, chrome orange, molyb-
not to exceed 24 hours after discovery; date chrome orange, anhydrous and hy-
and (4) discharges from safety showers drous chromium oxide, chrome green,
and related personal safety equipment: and zinc yellow.
275
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00275 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.342 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) The term product means chrome (b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
pigments. and 403.13 and paragraph (a) of this sec-
tion, any existing source subject to
§ 415.342 Effluent limitations guide- this subpart which introduces pollut-
lines representing the degree of ef- ants into a publicly owned treatment
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable works must comply with 40 CFR part
control technology currently avail- 403 and achieve the following
able (BPT). pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES):
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point SUBPART AH—CHROME PIGMENTS
source subject to this subpart must
achieve the following effluent limita- PSES effluent limitations
tions representing the degree of efflu- Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
cation of the best practicable control secutive days
technology currently available (BPT):
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
SUBPART AH—CHROME PIGMENTS
Chromium (T) ........................ 2.9 1.2
BPT effluent limitations Lead (T) ................................. 3.4 1.4
Zinc (T) .................................. 2.9 1.2
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- In cases where POTWs find it necessary
secutive days
to impose mass limitations, the fol-
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 lowing equivalent mass limitations are
lb) of product
provided as an alternate: The limita-
TSS ........................................ 9.1 3.8
tions for Chromium(T), Lead(T), and
Chromium (T) ........................ 0.31 0.13 Zinc(T) are the same as specified in
Lead (T) ................................. 0.36 0.15 § 415.342
Zinc (T) .................................. 0.31 0.13
pH .......................................... (1) (1) § 415.345 New source performance
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. standards (NSPS).
§ 415.343 Effluent limitations guide- Any new source subject to this sub-
lines representing the degree of ef- part must achieve the following new
fluent reduction attainable by the source performance standards (NSPS):
application of the best available The limitations are the same as speci-
technology economically achievable fied in § 415.342.
(BAT).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 § 415.346 Pretreatment standards for
new sources (PSNS).
through 125.32, any existing point
source subject to this subpart must Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
achieve the following effluent limita- any new source subject to this subpart
tions representing the degree of efflu- which introduces pollutants into a pub-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- licly owned treatment works must
cation of the best available technology comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
economically achievable (BAT): The achieve the following Pretreatment
limitations for Chromium(T), Lead(T), Standards for New Sources (PSNS):
and Zinc(T) are the same as specified The limitations are the same as speci-
in § 415.342. fied in § 415.344.
[47 FR 55227, Dec. 8, 1982]
§ 415.344 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources (PSES). § 415.347 Effluent limitations guide-
(a) Existing sources which annually lines representing the degree of ef-
introduce less than 210,000 cubic meters fluent reduction attainable by the
per year (55 million gallons per year) of application of the best conventional
chrome pigments process wastewater pollutant control technology (BCT).
into a publicly owned treatment works Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
are subject only to the standards speci- through 125.32, any existing point
fied in 40 CFR part 403. source subject to this subpart must
276
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00276 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.362
277
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00277 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.363 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART AJ—COPPER SULFATE, COPPER and selenium (T) are the same as speci-
CHLORIDE, COPPER IODIDE, COPPER NITRATE fied in § 415.362(a).
(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR
BPT effluent limitations
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
Average of source subject to this subpart and pro-
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- ducing copper carbonate must achieve
secutive days
the following effluent limitations rep-
Kg/kkg (or pounds per/1,000 resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
lb) of product tion attainable by the application of
the best available technology economi-
TSS ........................................ 0.069 0.023
Copper (T) ............................. 0.0030 0.0010
cally achievable (BAT): The limita-
Nickel (T) ............................... 0.0060 0.0020 tions for copper (T), nickel (T) and se-
Selenium (T) .......................... 0.0015 0.00050 lenium (T) are the same as specified in
pH .......................................... (1) (1) § 415.362(b).
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
§ 415.364 Pretreatment standards for
(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR existing sources (PSES).
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point
source subject to this subpart and pro- (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
ducing copper carbonate must achieve and 403.13, any existing source subject
the following effluent limitations rep- to this subpart and producing copper
resenting the degree of effluent reduc- sulfate, copper chloride, copper iodide,
tion attainable by the application of or copper nitrate which introduces pol-
the best practicable control technology lutants into a publicly owned treat-
currently available (BPT): ment works must comply with 40 CFR
part 403 and achieve the following
SUBPART AJ—COPPER CARBONATE pretreatment standards for existing
BPT effluent limitations sources (PSES):
Average of SUBPART AJ—COPPER SULFATE, COPPER
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- CHLORIDE, COPPER IODIDE, COPPER NITRATE
secutive days
PSES effluent limitations
Kg/kkg (or pounds per/1,000
lb) of product Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
TSS ........................................ 4.2 1.4 secutive days
Copper (T) ............................. 0.19 0.064
Nickel (T) ............................... 0.37 0.12 Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
Selenium (T) .......................... 0.093 0.031
pH .......................................... (1) (1)
Copper(T) .............................. 3.2 1.1
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. Nickel(T) ................................ 6.4 2.1
Selenium(T) ........................... 1.6 0.53
§ 415.363 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the In cases where POTWs find it necessary
application of the best available to impose mass limitations, the fol-
technology economically achievable lowing equivalent mass limitations are
(BAT). provided as an alternate: The limita-
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR tions for copper (T), nickel (T), and se-
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point lenium (T) are the same as specified in
source subject to this subpart and pro- § 415.362(a).
ducing copper sulfate, copper chloride, (b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
copper iodide, or copper nitrate must and 403.13, any existing source subject
achieve the following effluent limita- to this subpart and producing copper
tions representing the degree of efflu- carbonate which introduces pollutants
ent reduction attainable by the appli- into a publicly owned treatment works
cation of the best available technology must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
economically achievable (BAT): The achieve the following pretreatment
limitations for copper (T), nickel (T), standards for existing sources (PSES):
278
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00278 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.381
279
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00279 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.382 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) The term process wastewater ment works must comply with 40 CFR
means any water which, during manu- part 403 and achieve the following
facturing or processing, comes into di- pretreatment standards for existing
rect contact with or results from the sources (PSES):
production or use of any raw material,
intermediate product, finished product, SUBPART AL—FERRIC CHLORIDE
by-product, or waste product. The term PSES limitations
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include
contaminated nonprocess wastewater, Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
as defined below. any 1 day for 30 con-
(c) The term process wastewater pollut- secutive days
ants means pollutants present in proc- Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
ess wastewater.
(d) The term contaminated nonprocess Total Chromium ..................... 3.0 1.0
wastewater shall mean any water Hexavalent Chromium ........... 0.25 0.09
Copper (T) ............................. 1.0 0.50
which, during manufacturing or proc- Nickel (T) ............................... 2.0 1.0
essing, comes into incidental contact Zinc (T) .................................. 5.0 2.5
with any raw material, intermediate
product, finished product, by-product § 415.385 [Reserved]
or waste product by means of (1) rain-
fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac- § 415.386 Pretreatment standards for
cidental leaks caused by the failure of new sources (PSNS).
process equipment, which are repaired Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
within the shortest reasonable time any new source subject to this subpart
not to exceed 24 hours after discovery; which introduces pollutants into a pub-
and (4) discharges from safety showers licly owned treatment works must
and related personal safety equipment: comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
Provided, that all reasonable measures achieve the following pretreatment
have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce standards for new sources (PSNS): The
and control such contact to the max- limitations are the same as specified in
imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti- § 415.382.
gate the effects of such contact once it
has occurred. [49 FR 33423, Aug. 22, 1984]
280
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00280 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.411
281
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00281 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.412 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
282
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00282 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.431
SUBPART AP—HYDROGEN CYANIDE itations are the same for TSS and pH
as specified in § 415.422.
NSPS effluent limitations
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values Subpart AQ—Iodine Production
any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
Subcategory
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000 § 415.430 Applicability; description of
lb) of product the iodine production subcategory.
TSS ........................................ 8.6 3.2 The provisions of this subpart are ap-
Cyanide A .............................. 0.10 0.021 plicable to discharges resulting from
Total Cyanide ........................ 0.65 0.23
Total Residual Chlorine ......... 0.086 0.051
the production of iodine.
Ph .......................................... (1) (1)
1 Within
§ 415.431 Specialized definitions.
the range 6.0 to 10.5.
For the purpose of this subpart:
§ 415.426 Pretreatment standards for (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
new sources (PSNS).
eral definitions, abbreviations and
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, methods of analysis set forth in part
any new source subject to this subpart 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
which introduces pollutants into a pub- subpart.
licly owned treatment works must (b) The term process wastewater
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and means any water which, during manu-
achieve the following Pretreatment
facturing or processing, comes into di-
Standards for New Sources (PSNS):
rect contact with or results from the
SUBPART AP—HYDROGEN CYANIDE production or use of any raw material,
intermediate product, finished product,
PSNS effluent
limitations by-product, or waste product. The term
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- contaminated non-process wastewater,
for any 1 ues for 30 as defined below.
day consecu-
tive days (c) The term process wastewater pollut-
ants means pollutants present in proc-
Milligrams per liter
ess wastewater.
Cyanide A ...................................... 1.7 0.36 (d) The term contaminated non-process
Total Cyanide ................................ 11 4.0 wastewater shall mean any water
which, during manufacturing or proc-
In cases where POTWs find it necessary essing, comes into incidental contact
to impose mass limitations, the fol- with any raw material, intermediate
lowing equivalent mass limitations are product, finished product, by-product
provided as an alternate: The limita- or waste product by means of (1) rain-
tions for Cyanide A and Total Cyanide fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac-
are the same as specified in § 415.425. cidental leaks caused by the failure of
[47 FR 55227, Dec. 8, 1982] process equipment, which are repaired
within the shortest reasonable time
§ 415.427 Effluent limitations guide- not to exceed 24 hours after discovery;
lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the and (4) discharges from safety showers
application of the best conventional and related personal safety equipment:
pollutant control technology (BCT). Provided, that all reasonable measures
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce
through 125.32, any existing point and control such contact to the max-
source subject to this subpart must imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti-
achieve the following effluent limita- gate the effects of such contact once it
tions representing the degree of efflu- has occurred.
ent reduction attainable by the appli- [47 FR 28278, June 29, 1982; 47 FR 55227, Dec.
cation of the best conventional pollut- 8, 1982]
ant control technology (BCT): The lim-
283
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00283 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.432 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
284
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00284 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.471
285
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00285 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.472 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- the best practicable control technology
eral definitions, abbreviations, and currently available (BPT):
methods of analysis set forth in part
401 of this chapter shall apply to this SUBPART AU—NICKEL CARBONATE
subpart. BPT effluent limitations
(b) The term product shall mean nick-
el salts. Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
(c) The term nickel shall mean the any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
total nickel present in the process
wastewater stream exiting the waste- Kg/kkg (or pounds per/1,000
water treatment system. lb) of product
(d) The term copper shall mean the
total copper present in the process TSS ........................................ 17. 5.6
Nickel (T) ............................... 1.1 0.35
wastewater stream exiting the waste- pH .......................................... (1) (1)
water treatment system.
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
§ 415.472 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef- § 415.473 Effluent limitations guide-
fluent reduction attainable by the lines representing the degree of ef-
application of the best practicable fluent reduction attainable by the
control technology currently avail- application of the best available
able (BPT). technology economically achievable
(BAT).
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
source subject to this subpart and pro- 125.30 through 125.32 any existing point
ducing nickel sulfate, nickel chloride, source subject to this subpart and pro-
nickel nitrate, or nickel fluoborate ducing nickel sulfate, nickel chloride,
must achieve the following effluent nickel nitrate, or nickel fluoborate
limitations representing the degree of must achieve the following effluent
effluent reduction attainable by the ap- limitations representing the degree of
plication of the best practicable con- effluent reduction attainable by the ap-
trol technology currently available plication of the best available tech-
(BPT): nology economically achievable (BAT):
SUBPART AU—NICKEL SULFATE, NICKEL CHLO- SUBPART AU—NICKEL SULFATE, NICKEL CHLO-
RIDE, NICKEL NITRATE, NICKEL FLUOBORATE RIDE, NICKEL NITRATE, NICKEL FLUOBORATE
286
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00286 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.475
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum for daily values Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days secutive days
287
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00287 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.476 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
288
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00288 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.531
the production of potassium chloride 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
by the Trona process and by the min- subpart.
ing process. (b) The term product shall mean po-
tassium iodide.
§ 415.501 Specialized definitions. [Re-
served] § 415.512 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef-
§ 415.502 Effluent limitations guide- fluent reduction attainable by the
lines representing the degree of ef- application of the best practicable
fluent reduction attainable by the control technology currently avail-
application of the best practicable able (BPT).
control technology currently avail-
able (BPT). Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 source subject to this subpart must
through 125.32, any existing point achieve the following effluent limita-
source subject to this subpart must tions representing the degree of efflu-
achieve the following effluent limita- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
tions representing the degree of efflu- cation of the best practicable control
ent reduction attainable by the appli- technology currently available (BPT):
cation of the best practicable control
technology currently available (BPT): SUBPART AY—POTASSIUM IODIDE
There shall be no discharge of process
wastewater pollutants to navigable wa- BPT effluent limitations
ters, except that residual brine and de- Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
pleted liquor may be returned to the Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
body of water from which the process secutive days
brine solution was originally with-
Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
drawn. lb) of product
§§ 415.503–415.505 [Reserved]
TSS ........................................ 0.090 0.030
Sulfide .................................... 0.015 0.0050
§ 415.506 Pretreatment standards for Iron ......................................... 0.015 0.0050
new sources (PSNS). Barium ................................... 0.0090 0.0030
pH .......................................... (1) (1)
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
any new source subject to this subpart 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
which introduces pollutants into a pub-
licly owned treatment works must Subpart AZ—Potassium Per-
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and manganate Production Sub-
achieve the following pretreatment category [Reserved]
standards for new sources (PSNS): The
limitations are the same as specified in
§ 415.502. Subpart BA—Silver Nitrate
Production Subcategory
[49 FR 33425, Aug. 22, 1984]
§ 415.530 Applicability; description of
Subpart AY—Potassium Iodide the silver nitrate production sub-
category.
Production Subcategory
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
§ 415.510 Applicability; description of plicable to discharges and to the intro-
the potassium iodide production duction of pollutants into publicly
subcategory. owned treatment works resulting from
The provisions of this subpart are ap- the production of silver nitrate.
plicable to discharges resulting from
the production of potassium iodide. § 415.531 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
§ 415.511 Specialized definitions. (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
For the purpose of this subpart: eral definitions, abbreviations and
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- methods of analysis set forth in part
eral definitions, abbreviations and 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
methods of analysis set forth in part subpart.
289
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00289 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.532 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) The term product shall mean sil- SUBPART BA—SILVER NITRATE
ver nitrate.
BPT limitations
(c) The term process wastewater
means any water which, during manu- Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values
facturing or processing, comes into di- any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
rect contact with or results from the
production or use of any raw material, Kg/kkg (or pounds per 1,000
intermediate product, finished product, lb) of product
by-product, or waste product. The term
Silver ...................................... 0.0090 0.0030
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include TSS ........................................ 0.069 0.023
contaminated non-process wastewater, pH .......................................... (1) (1)
as defined below. 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
(d) The term process wastewater pol-
lutants means pollutants present in § 415.533 [Reserved]
process wastewater.
§ 415.534 Pretreatment standards for
(e) The term contaminated non-process existing sources (PSES).
wastewater shall mean any water
which, during manufacturing or proc- Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
essing, comes into incidental contact and 403.13, any existing source subject
with any raw material, intermediate to this subpart which introduces pol-
lutants into a publicly owned treat-
product, finished product, by-product
ment works must comply with 40 CFR
or waste product by means of (1) rain-
part 403 and achieve the following
fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac- pretreatment standards for existing
cidental leaks caused by the failure of sources (PSES):
process equipment, which are repaired
within the shortest reasonable time SUBPART BA—SILVER NITRATE
not to exceed 24 hours after discovery;
PSES limitations
and (4) discharges from safety showers
and related personal safety equipment: Pollution or pollutant property Average of
Maximum for daily values
Provided, That all reasonable measures any 1 day for 30 con-
have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce secutive days
and control such contact to the max- Milligram per liter (mg/l)
imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti-
gate the effects of such contact once it Silver ...................................... 1.0 0.5
has occurred.
290
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00290 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.550
291
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00291 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.551 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
292
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00292 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.631
293
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00293 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.632 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) The term process wastewater comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
means any water which, during manu- achieve the following pretreatment
facturing or processing, comes into di- standards for new sources (PSNS): The
rect contact with or results from the limitations are the same as specified in
production or use of any raw material, § 415.632.
intermediate product, finished product,
by-product, or waste product. The term [49 FR 33425, Aug. 22, 1984]
‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include
contaminated non-process wastewater, Subpart BL—Cadmium Pigments
as defined below. and Salts Production Subcategory
(c) The term process wastewater pollut-
ants means pollutants present in proc-
SOURCE: 49 FR 33426, Aug. 22, 1984, unless
ess wastewater. otherwise noted.
(d) The term contaminated non-process
wastewater shall mean any water § 415.640 Applicability; description of
which, during manufacturing or proc- the cadmium pigments and salts
essing, comes into incidental contact production subcategory.
with any raw material, intermediate
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
product, finished product, by-product
plicable to discharges and to the intro-
or waste product by means of (1) rain-
duction of pollutants into treatment
fall runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) ac-
cidental leaks caused by the failure of works which are publicly owned result-
process equipment, which are repaired ing from the production of cadmium
within the shortest reasonable time pigments and salts including cadmium
not to exceed 24 hours after discovery; chloride, cadmium nitrate, and cad-
and (4) discharges from safety showers mium sulfate salts.
and related personal safety equipment:
§ 415.641 Specialized definitions.
Provided, that all reasonable measures
have been taken (i) to prevent, reduce For the purpose of this subpart:
and control such contact to the max- (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
imum extent feasible; and (ii) to miti- eral definitions, abbreviations, and
gate the effects of such contact once it methods of analysis set forth in part
has occurred. 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
subpart.
§ 415.632 Effluent limitations guide- (b) The term product shall mean cad-
lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the mium pigment or cadmium salt.
application of the best practicable (c) The term cadmium shall mean the
control technology currently avail- total cadmium present in the process
able (BPT). wastewater stream exiting the waste-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 water treatment system.
through 125.32, any existing point (d) The term selenium shall mean the
source subject to this subpart must total selenium present in the process
achieve the following effluent limita- wastewater stream exiting the waste-
tions representing the degree of efflu- water treatment system.
ent reduction attainable by the appli- (e) The term zinc shall mean the
cation of the best practicable control total zinc present in the process waste-
technology currently available (BPT): water stream exiting the wastewater
There shall be no discharge of process treatment system.
wastewater pollutants to navigable wa-
ters. § 415.642 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef-
§§ 415.633–415.635 [Reserved] fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable
§ 415.636 Pretreatment standards for control technology currently avail-
new sources (PSNS). able (BPT).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
any new source subject to this subpart 125.30 through 125.32 any existing point
which introduces pollutants into a pub- source subject to this subpart and pro-
licly owned treatment works must ducing cadmium pigments must
294
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00294 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.644
achieve the following effluent limita- cation of the best available technology
tions representing the degree of efflu- economically achievable (BAT): The
ent reduction attainable by the appli- limitations for Cadmium (T), Selenium
cation of the best practicable control (T), and Zinc (T) are the same as speci-
technology currently available (BPT). fied in § 415.642(a).
(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR
SUBPART BL—CADMIUM PIGMENTS
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point
BPT effluent limitations source subject to this subpart and pro-
Average of ducing cadmium salts must achieve the
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values following effluent limitations rep-
any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of
Kg/kkg (or pounds per/1,000
lb) of product
the best available technology economi-
cally achievable (BAT): The limita-
TSS ........................................ 2.59 1.57 tions for cadmium (T), selenium (T),
Cadmium (T) .......................... 0.078 0.026 and zinc (T) are the same as specified
Selenium (T) .......................... 0.11 0.037
Zinc (T) .................................. 0.017 0.0092
in § 414.642(b).
pH .......................................... 1
( ) 1
( )
1 Within
§ 415.644 Pretreatment standards for
the range 6.0 to 9.0.
existing sources (PSES).
(b) Except as provided in 40 CFR (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point and 403.13, any existing source subject
source subject to this subpart and pro-
to this subpart and producing cadmium
ducing cadmium salts must achieve the
pigments which introduces pollutants
following effluent limitations rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc- into a publicly owned treatment works
tion attainable by the application of must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
the best practicable control technology achieve the following pretreatment
currently available (BPT): standards for existing sources (PSES):
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values Maximum for daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- any 1 day for 30 con-
day secutive secutive days
days
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
Kg/kkg (or pounds per/
1,000 lb) of product
Cadmium (T) .......................... 0.84 0.28
Selenium (T) .......................... 1.1 0.40
TSS ............................................ 0.0016 0.001
Zinc (T) .................................. 0.18 0.10
Cadmium (T) ............................. 4.87×10¥5 1.62×10¥5
Selenium (T) .............................. 7.0×10¥5 2.3×10¥5
Zinc (T) ...................................... 1.04×10¥5 5.8×10¥6 In cases where POTWs find it necessary
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
to impose mass limitations, the fol-
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. lowing equivalent mass limitations are
§ 415.643 Effluent limitations guide- provided as an alternate: The limita-
lines representing the degree of ef- tions for cadmium (T), selenium (T),
fluent reduction attainable by the and zinc (T) are the same as specified
application of the best available in § 415.642(a).
technology economically achievable (b) Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
(BAT). and 403.13, any existing source subject
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR to this subpart and producing cadmium
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point salts which introduces pollutants into
source subject to this subpart and pro- a publicly owned treatment works
ducing cadmium pigments must must comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
achieve the following effluent limita- achieve the following pretreatment
tions representing the degree of efflu- standards for existing sources (PSES):
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
295
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00295 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.645 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART BL—CADMIUM SALTS (T), and zinc (T) are the same as speci-
fied in § 415.644(b).
PSES effluent limitations
296
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00296 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.656
(d) The term copper shall mean the § 415.654 Pretreatment standards for
total copper present in the process existing sources (PSES).
wastewater stream exiting the waste-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
water treatment system.
and 403.13, any existing source subject
(e) The term nickel shall mean the
total nickel present in the process to this subpart which introduces pol-
wastewater stream exiting the waste- lutants into a publicly owned treat-
water treatment system. ment works must comply with 40 CFR
part 403 and achieve the following
§ 415.652 Effluent limitations guide- pretreatment standards for existing
lines representing the degree of ef- sources (PSES):
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable SUBPART BM—COBALT SALTS
control technology currently avail-
able (BPT). PSES effluent limitations
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
through 125.32 any existing point Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
source subject to this subpart must secutive days
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Cobalt (T) ............................... 3.6 1.4
cation of the best practicable control
Copper (T) ............................. 3.3 1.0
technology currently available (BPT): Nickel (T) ............................... 3.3 1.0
297
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00297 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.657 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
298
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00298 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 415.671
299
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00299 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 415.672 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(e) The term lead shall mean the SUBPART BO—ZINC CHLORIDE
total lead present in the process waste-
BAT effluent limitations
water stream exiting the wastewater
treatment system. Pollutant or pollutant Average of
property Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con-
§ 415.672 Effluent limitations guide- secutive days
lines representing the degree of ef-
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best practicable
Arsenic (T) ......................... 3.0 1.0
control technology currently avail- Zinc (T) .............................. 2.3 0.76
able (BPT). Lead (T) ............................. 0.18 0.048
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
125.30 through 125.32 any existing point [49 FR 33428, Aug. 22, 1984; 49 FR 37594, Sept.
source subject to this subpart must 25, 1984]
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- § 415.674 Pretreatment standards for
ent reduction attainable by the appli- existing sources (PSES).
cation of the best practicable control Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
technology currently available (BPT). and 403.13, any existing source subject
to this subpart which introduces pol-
SUBPART BO—ZINC CHLORIDE lutants into a publicly owned treat-
ment works must comply with 40 CFR
BPT effluent limitations
part 403 and achieve the following
Pollutant or pollutant property Average of pretreatment standards for existing
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- sources (PSES):
secutive days
SUBPART BO—ZINC CHLORIDE
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
PSES effluent limitations
TSS ........................................ 43 25 Pollutant or pollutant Average of
Arsenic (T) ............................. 3.0 1.0 property Maximum for daily values
Zinc (T) .................................. 11.4 3.8 any 1 day for 30 con-
Lead (T) ................................. 1.8 0.6 secutive days
pH .......................................... (1) (1)
Milligrams per liter (mg/l)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 10.0
Arsenic (T) ......................... 3.0 1.0
[49 FR 33428, Aug. 22, 1984; 49 FR 37594, Sept. Zinc (T) .............................. 2.3 0.76
25, 1984] Lead (T) ............................. 0.18 0.048
§ 415.673 Effluent limitations guide- [49 FR 33428, Aug. 22, 1984; 49 FR 37594, Sept.
lines representing the degree of ef- 25, 1984]
fluent reduction attainable by the
application of the best available § 415.675 New source performance
technology economically achievable standards (NSPS):
(BAT). Any new source subject to this sub-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 part must achieve the following new
through 125.32 any existing point source performance standards (NSPS):
source subject to this subpart must
achieve the following effluent limita- SUBPART BO—ZINC CHLORIDE
tions representing the degree of efflu- NSPS effluent limitations
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Pollutant or pollutant Average of
cation of the best available technology property Maximum for daily values
economically achievable (BAT). any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
TSS .................................... 28 17
Arsenic (T) ......................... 3.0 1.0.
Zinc (T) .............................. 2.3 0.76
Lead (T) ............................. 0.18 0.048
300
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00300 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 417
301
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00301 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 417 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
417.42 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart G—Manufacture of Bar Soaps
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently 417.70 Applicability; description of the man-
available. ufacture of bar soaps subcategory.
417.43 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 417.71 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 417.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically
practicable control technology currently
achievable. available.
417.44 Pretreatment standards for existing 417.73 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
417.45 Standards of performance for new attainable by the application of the best
sources. available technology economically
417.46 Pretreatment standards for new achievable.
sources. 417.74 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart E—Glycerine Distillation 417.75 Standards of performance for new
Subcategory sources.
417.76 Pretreatment standards for new
417.50 Applicability; description of the glyc- sources.
erine distillation subcategory.
417.51 Specialized definitions. Subpart H—Manufacture of Liquid Soaps
417.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 417.80 Applicability; description of the man-
attainable by the application of the best ufacture of liquid soaps subcategory.
practicable control technology currently 417.81 Specialized definitions.
available. 417.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently
available technology economically available.
achievable. 417.83 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.54 Pretreatment standards for existing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
417.55 Standards of performance for new available technology economically
achievable.
sources.
417.84 Pretreatment standards for existing
417.56 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
sources. 417.85 Standards of performance for new
sources.
Subpart F—Manufacture of Soap Flakes 417.86 Pretreatment standards for new
and Powders Subcategory sources.
417.60 Applicability; description of the man- Subpart I—Oleum Sulfonation and Sulfation
ufacture of soap flakes and powders sub- Subcategory
category.
417.61 Specialized definitions. 417.90 Applicability; description of the
417.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- oleum sulfonation and sulfation sub-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction category.
attainable by the application of the best 417.91 Specialized definitions.
practicable control technology currently 417.92 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
417.63 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction practicable control technology currently
available.
attainable by the application of the best
417.93 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available technology economically
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
achievable.
attainable by the application of the best
417.64 Pretreatment standards for existing available technology economically
sources. achievable.
417.65 Standards of performance for new 417.94 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
417.66 Pretreatment standards for new 417.95 Standards of performance for new
sources. sources.
302
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00302 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 417
417.96 Pretreatment standards for new 417.124 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
417.125 Standards of performance for new
Subpart J—Air—SO3 Sulfation and sources.
Sulfonation Subcategory 417.126 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
417.100 Applicability; description of the
air—SO3 sulfation and sulfonation sub- Subpart M—Chlorosulfonic Acid Sulfation
category. Subcategory
417.101 Specialized definitions.
417.102 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 417.130 Applicability; description of the
resenting the degree of effluent reduction chlorosulfonic acid sulfation sub-
attainable by the application of the best category.
practicable control technology currently 417.131 Specialized definitions.
available. 417.132 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.103 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently
available technology economically available.
achievable. 417.133 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.104 Pretreatment standards for existing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
417.105 Standards of performance for new available technology economically
sources. achievable.
417.106 Pretreatment standards for new 417.134 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
417.135 Standards of performance for new
Subpart K—SO3 Solvent and Vacuum sources.
Sulfonation Subcategory 417.136 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
417.110 Applicability; description of the SO3
solvent and vacuum sulfonation sub- Subpart N—Neutralization of Sulfuric Acid
category. Esters and Sulfonic Acids Subcategory
417.111 Specialized definitions.
417.112 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 417.140 Applicability; description of the neu-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction tralization of sulfuric acid esters and sul-
attainable by the application of the best fonic acids subcategory.
practicable control technology currently 417.141 Specialized definitions.
available. 417.142 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.113 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently
available technology economically available.
achievable. 417.143 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
417.114 Pretreatment standards for existing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
417.115 Standards of performance for new available technology economically
sources. achievable.
417.116 Pretreatment standards for new 417.144 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
417.145 Standards of performance for new
Subpart L—Sulfamic Acid Sulfation sources.
Subcategory 417.146 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
417.120 Applicability; description of the sul-
famic acid sulfation subcategory. Subpart O—Manufacture of Spray Dried
417.121 Specialized definitions. Detergents Subcategory
417.122 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 417.150 Applicability; description of the
attainable by the application of the best manufacture of spray dried detergents
practicable control technology currently subcategory.
available. 417.151 Specialized definitions.
417.123 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 417.152 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically practicable control technology currently
achievable. available.
303
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00303 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
417.153 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction available.
attainable by the application of the best 417.183 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available technology economically resenting the degree of effluent reduction
achievable. attainable by the application of the best
417.154 [Reserved] available technology economically
417.155 Standards of performance for new achievable.
sources. 417.184 [Reserved]
417.156 Pretreatment standards for new 417.185 Standards of performance for new
sources. sources.
417.186 Pretreatment standards for new
Subpart P—Manufacture of Liquid sources.
Detergents Subcategory
Subpart S—Manufacture of Detergent Bars
417.160 Applicability; description of the
manufacture of liquid detergents sub-
and Cakes Subcategory
category. 417.190 Applicability; description of the
417.161 Specialized definitions. manufacture of detergent bars and cakes
417.162 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- subcategory.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 417.191 Specialized definitions.
attainable by the application of the best
417.192 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
available.
attainable by the application of the best
417.163 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
available.
attainable by the application of the best
417.193 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available technology economically
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
achievable.
attainable by the application of the best
417.164 [Reserved]
417.165 Standards of performance for new available technology economically
sources. achievable.
417.166 Pretreatment standards for new 417.194 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources. sources.
417.195 Standards of performance for new
Subpart Q—Manufacture of Detergents by sources.
Dry Blending Subcategory 417.196 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
417.170 Applicability; description of the AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b) and (c), 306 (b)
manufacturing of detergents by dry and (c), and 307(c) of the Federal Water Pol-
blending subcategory. lution Control Act as amended, (the Act); 33
417.171 Specialized definitions. U.S.C. 1251, 1311, 1314 (b) and (c), 1316 (b) and
417.172 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (c) and 1317(c), 86 Stat. 816 et seq.; Pub. L. 92–
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 500.
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently SOURCE: 39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, unless
available. otherwise noted.
417.173 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
Subpart A—Soap Manufacturing
available technology economically by Batch Kettle Subcategory
achievable.
417.174 [Reserved] § 417.10 Applicability; description of
417.175 Standards of performance for new the soap manufacturing by batch
sources. kettle subcategory.
417.176 Pretreatment standards for new The provisions of this subpart are ap-
sources.
plicable to discharges resulting from
Subpart R—Manufacture of Drum Dried the operations in which neat soap is
Detergents Subcategory produced through saponification of ani-
mal and vegetable fats and oils by boil-
417.180 Applicability; description of the ing in kettles.
manufacture of drum dried detergents
subcategory. § 417.11 Specialized definitions.
417.181 Specialized definitions.
417.182 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- For the purpose of this subpart:
resenting the degree of effluent reduction (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
attainable by the application of the best eral definitions, abbreviations and
304
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00304 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.15
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR point source subject to the provisions
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. of this subpart after application of the
(b) The term anhydrous product shall best available technology economically
mean the theoretical product that achievable:
would result if all water were removed
Effluent limitations
from the actual product.
(c) The term neat soap shall mean the Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
solution of completely saponified and for any 1 consecutive days
purified soap containing about 20–30 day shall not
exceed—
percent water which is ready for final
formulation into a finished product. Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
§ 417.12 Effluent limitations guidelines uct)
representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica- BOD5 ................................... 0.80 0.40
COD ..................................... 2.10 1.05
tion of the best practicable control TSS ...................................... 0.80 .40
technology currently available. Oil and grease ..................... 0.10 .05
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
through 125.32, any existing point English units (pounds per
source subject to this subpart shall 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- BOD5 ................................... 0.80 0.40
COD ..................................... 2.10 1.05
ent reduction attainable by the appli- TSS ...................................... 0.80 .40
cation of the best practicable control Oil and grease ..................... 0.10 .05
technology currently available (BPT): pH ........................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
Effluent limitations
305
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00305 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.16 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
306
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00306 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.24
Effluent limitations
§ 417.24 Pretreatment standards for
Average of daily existing sources.
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days Any existing source subject to this
day shall not subpart that introduces process waste-
exceed—
water pollutants into a publicly owned
Metric units (kilograms per treatment works must comply with 40
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod- CFR part 403. In addition, the following
uct)
pretreatment standard establishes the
BOD5 ................................... 0.50 0.25 quantity or quality of pollutants or
COD ..................................... 1.80 .90 pollutant properties controlled by this
TSS ...................................... 0.40 .20 section which may be discharged to a
Oil and grease ..................... 0.30 .15 publicly owned treatment works by a
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
point source subject to the provisions
English units (pounds per of this subpart.
1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
BOD5 ................................... 0.50 0.25 pH ................................................... No limitation.
COD ..................................... 1.80 .90 BOD5 .............................................. Do.
TSS ...................................... 0.40 .20 TSS ................................................. Do.
Oil and grease ..................... 0.30 .15 Oil and grease ................................ Do.
307
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00307 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.25 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
308
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00308 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.35
309
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00309 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.36 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
310
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00310 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.51
311
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00311 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.52 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
312
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00312 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.63
313
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00313 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.64 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
314
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00314 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.75
pH ................................................... No limitation.
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60 BOD5 .............................................. Do.
FR 33953, June 29, 1995] TSS ................................................. Do.
Oil and grease ................................ Do.
§ 417.73 Effluent limitations guidelines COD ................................................ Do.
representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica-
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60
tion of the best available tech-
FR 33953, June 29, 1995]
nology economically achievable.
The following limitations establish § 417.75 Standards of performance for
the quantity or quality of pollutants or new sources.
pollutant properties, controlled by this The following standards of perform-
section, which may be discharged by a ance establish the quantity or quality
point source subject to the provisions of pollutants or pollutant properties,
of this subpart after application of the controlled by this section, which may
best available technology economically be discharged by a new source subject
achievable: to the provisions of this subpart:
315
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00315 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.76 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of daily
BOD5 ................................... 0.40 0.20 Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
COD ..................................... 1.20 .60 for any 1 consecutive days
TSS ...................................... 0.68 .34 day shall not
exceed—
Oil and grease ..................... 0.06 .03
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Metric units (kilograms per
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
uct)
§ 417.76 Pretreatment standards for
new sources. BOD5 ................................... 0.03 0.01
COD ..................................... 0.15 .05
Any new source subject to this sub- TSS ...................................... 0.03 .01
part that introduces process waste- Oil and grease ..................... 0.03 .01
water pollutants into a publicly owned pH ........................................ (1) (1)
treatment works must comply with 40
CFR part 403. English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
[60 FR 33953, June 29, 1995]
BOD5 ................................... 0.03 0.01
COD ..................................... 0.15 .05
Subpart H—Manufacture of Liquid TSS ...................................... 0.03 .01
Soaps Subcategory Oil and grease ..................... 0.03 .01
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
§ 417.80 Applicability; description of 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
the manufacture of liquid soaps
subcategory.
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60
The provisions of this subpart are ap- FR 33953, June 29, 1995]
plicable to discharges resulting from
the blending of ingredients employed § 417.83 Effluent limitations guidelines
in the manufacture of liquid soaps and representing the degree of effluent
the packaging of the finished products. reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available tech-
§ 417.81 Specialized definitions. nology economically achievable.
For the purpose of this subpart: The following limitations establish
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- the quantity or quality of pollutants or
eral definitions, abbreviations and pollutant properties, controlled by this
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR section, which may be discharged by a
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. point source subject to the provisions
(b) The term anhydrous product shall of this subpart after application of the
mean the theoretical product that best available technology economically
would result if all water were removed achievable:
from the actual product.
316
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00316 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.91
317
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00317 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.92 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) The term surfactant shall mean best available technology economically
those methylene blue active substances achievable:
amendable to measurement by the
Effluent limitations
method described in ‘‘Methods for
Chemical Analysis of Water and Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
Wastes,’’ 1971, Environmental Protec- for any 1 consecutive days
tion Agency, Analytical Quality Con- day shall not
exceed—
trol Laboratory, page 131.
Metric units (kilograms per
§ 417.92 Effluent limitations guidelines 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
representing the degree of effluent uct)
reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best practicable control BOD5 ................................... 0.07 0.02
technology currently available. COD ..................................... 0.27 .09
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 Surfactants ........................... 0.09 .03
through 125.32, any existing point Oil and grease ..................... 0.21 .07
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limita- English units (pounds per
tions representing the degree of efflu- 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable control BOD5 ................................... 0.07 0.02
COD ..................................... 0.27 .09
technology currently available (BPT): TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03
Surfactants ........................... 0.09 .03
Effluent limitations Oil and grease ..................... 0.21 .07
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
exceed— § 417.94 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources.
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod- Any existing source subject to this
uct) subpart that introduces process waste-
water pollutants into a publicly owned
BOD5 ................................... 0.09 0.02
COD ..................................... 0.40 .09
treatment works must comply with 40
TSS ...................................... 0.15 .03 CFR part 403. In addition, the following
Surfactants ........................... 0.15 .03 pretreatment standard establishes the
Oil and grease ..................... 0.25 .07 quantity or quality of pollutants or
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
pollutant properties controlled by this
English units (pounds per section which may be discharged to a
1,000 lb of anhydrous product) publicly owned treatment works by a
point source subject to the provisions
BOD5 ................................... 0.09 0.02
COD ..................................... 0.40 .09
of this subpart.
TSS ...................................... 0.15 .03
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
Surfactants ........................... 0.15 .03
Oil and grease ..................... 0.25 .07
pH ................................................... No limitation.
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
BOD5 .............................................. Do.
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. TSS ................................................. Do.
Oil and grease ................................ Do.
COD ................................................ Do.
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60
Surfactants ...................................... Do.
FR 33954, June 29, 1995]
§ 417.93 Effluent limitations guidelines [40 FR 6443, Feb. 11, 1975, as amended at 60
representing the degree of effluent FR 33954, June 29, 1995]
reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available tech- § 417.95 Standards of performance for
nology economically achievable. new sources.
The following limitations establish The following standards of perform-
the quantity or quality of pollutants or ance establish the quantity or quality
pollutant properties, controlled by this of pollutants or pollutant properties,
section, which may be discharged by a controlled by this section, which may
point source subject to the provisions be discharged by a new source subject
of this subpart after application of the to the provisions of this subpart:
318
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00318 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.103
319
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00319 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.104 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
320
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00320 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.115
would result if all water were removed pollutant properties, controlled by this
from the actual product. section, which may be discharged by a
(c) The term surfactant shall mean point source subject to the provisions
those methylene blue active substances of this subpart after application of the
amenable to measurement by the best available technology economically
method described in ‘‘Methods for achievable:
Chemical Analysis of Water and
Effluent limitations
Wastes,’’ 1971, Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Analytical Quality Con- Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
trol Laboratory, page 131. for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
§ 417.112 Effluent limitations guide- exceed—
lines representing the degree of ef- Metric units (kilograms per
fluent reduction attainable by the 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
application of the best practicable uct)
control technology currently avail-
able. BOD5 ................................... 0.20 0.10
COD ..................................... 0.90 .45
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 TSS ...................................... 0.02 .01
through 125.32, any existing point Surfactants ........................... 0.20 .10
source subject to this subpart shall Oil and grease ..................... 0.04 .02
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- English units (pounds per
ent reduction attainable by the appli- 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
cation of the best practicable control
BOD5 ................................... 0.20 0.10
technology currently available (BPT): COD ..................................... 0.90 .45
TSS ...................................... 0.02 .01
Effluent limitations
Surfactants ........................... 0.20 .10
Average of daily Oil and grease ..................... 0.04 .02
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 pH ........................................ (1) (1)
for any 1 consecutive days 1 Within
day shall not the range 6.0 to 9.0.
exceed—
§ 417.114 Pretreatment standards for
Metric units (kilograms per existing sources.
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
uct) Any existing source subject to this
subpart that introduces process waste-
BOD5 ................................... 0.90 0.30 water pollutants into a publicly owned
COD ..................................... 3.05 1.35
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03 treatment works must comply with 40
Surfactants ........................... 0.90 .30 CFR part 403. In addition, the following
Oil and grease ..................... 0.10 .05 pretreatment standard establishes the
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
quantity or quality of pollutants or
English units (pounds per pollutant properties controlled by this
1,000 lb of anhydrous product) section which may be discharged to a
publicly owned treatment works by a
BOD5 ................................... 0.90 0.30
COD ..................................... 3.05 1.35
point source subject to the provisions
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03 of this subpart.
Surfactants ........................... 0.90 .30
Oil and grease ..................... 0.10 .05 Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
pH ................................................... No limitation.
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. BOD5 .............................................. Do.
TSS ................................................. Do.
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60 Oil and grease ................................ Do.
COD ................................................ Do.
FR 33954, June 29, 1995]
Surfactants ...................................... Do.
321
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00321 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.116 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
322
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00322 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.131
323
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00323 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.132 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) The term surfactant shall mean point source subject to the provisions
those methylene blue active substances of this subpart after application of the
amendable to measurement by the best available technology economically
method described in ‘‘Methods for achievable:
Chemical Analysis of Water and
Effluent limitations
Wastes,’’ 1971, Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, Analytical Quality Con- Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
trol Laboratory, page 131. for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
§ 417.132 Effluent limitations guide- exceed—
lines representing the degree of ef- Metric units (kilograms per
fluent reduction attainable by the 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
application of the best practicable uct)
control technology currently avail-
able. BOD5 ................................... 0.30 0.15
COD ..................................... 1.50 .75
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 TSS ...................................... 0.04 .02
through 125.32, any existing point Surfactants ........................... 0.30 .15
source subject to this subpart shall Oil and grease ..................... 0.06 .03
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- English units (pounds per
ent reduction attainable by the appli- 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
cation of the best practicable control
BOD5 ................................... 0.30 0.15
technology currently available (BPT): COD ..................................... 1.50 .75
TSS ...................................... 0.04 .02
Effluent limitations
Surfactants ........................... 0.30 .15
Average of daily Oil and grease ..................... 0.06 .03
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 pH ........................................ (1) (1)
for any 1 consecutive days 1 Within
day shall not the range 6.0 to 9.0.
exceed—
§ 417.134 Pretreatment standards for
Metric units (kilograms per existing sources.
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
uct) Any existing source subject to this
subpart that introduces process waste-
BOD5 ................................... 0.90 0.30 water pollutants into a publicly owned
COD ..................................... 4.05 1.35
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03 treatment works must comply with 40
Surfactants ........................... 0.90 .30 CFR part 403. In addition, the following
Oil and grease ..................... 0.15 .05 pretreatment standard establishes the
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
quantity or quality of pollutants or
English units (pounds per pollutant properties controlled by this
1,000 lb of anhydrous product) section which may be discharged to a
publicly owned treatment works by a
BOD5 ................................... 0.90 0.30 point source subject to the provisions
COD ..................................... 4.05 1.35
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03 of this subpart.
Surfactants ........................... 0.90 .30
Oil and grease ..................... 0.15 .05 Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
pH ................................................... No limitations.
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. BOD5 .............................................. Do.
TSS ................................................. Do.
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60 Oil and grease ................................ Do.
COD ................................................ Do.
FR 33955, June 29, 1995]
Surfactants ...................................... Do.
324
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00324 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.142
The provisions of this subpart are ap- English units (pounds per
plicable to discharges resulting from 1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
the continuous or batch neutralization
of sulfated and sulfonated BOD5 ................................... 0.03 0.01
COD ..................................... 0.15 .05
alkylbenzenes, alcohols and other ma-
TSS ...................................... 0.09 .03
terials to convert them to neutral Surfactants ........................... 0.06 .02
salts. Oil and grease ..................... 0.03 .01
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
§ 417.141 Specialized definitions.
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- [39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 60
eral definitions, abbreviations and FR 33955, June 29, 1995]
325
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00325 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.143 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
326
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00326 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.152
all operations associated with the man- seed. Agitation employing a magnetic
ufacture of spray dried detergents, in- stirrer set at 200 to 500 rpm may be
cluding but not limited to assembly used.
and storage of raw materials,
crutching, spray drying, blending (in- [39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 40
FR 27454, June 30, 1975]
cluding tumble spraying of additives)
and packaging.
§ 417.152 Effluent limitations guide-
§ 417.151 Specialized definitions. lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the
For the purpose of this subpart: application of the best practicable
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- control technology currently avail-
eral definitions, abbreviations and able.
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
Except as provided in §§ 125.30
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) The term anhydrous product shall through 125.32, any existing point
mean the theoretical product that source subject to this subpart shall
would result if all water were removed achieve the following effluent limita-
from the actual product. tions representing the degree of efflu-
(c) The term surfactant shall mean ent reduction attainable by the appli-
those methylene blue active substances cation of the best practicable control
amenable to measurement by the technology currently available (BPT):
method described in ‘‘Methods for (a) For normal operation of spray
Chemical Analysis of Water and drying towers as defined above, the fol-
Wastes,’’ 1971, Environmental Protec- lowing values pertain:
tion Agency, Analytical Quality Con-
trol Laboratory, page 131. Effluent limitations
(d) The term normal operation of a Average of daily
spray tower shall mean operation uti- Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
lizing formulations that present day shall not
limitted air quality problems from exceed—
stack gases and associated need for ex- Metric units (kilograms per
tensive wet scrubbing, and without 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
more than 6 turnarounds in a 30 con- uct)
secutive day period, thus permitting
BOD5 ................................... 0.03 0.01
essentially complete recycle of waste
COD ..................................... 0.15 .05
water. TSS ...................................... 0.03 .01
(e) The term air quality restricted oper- Surfactants ........................... 0.06 .02
ation of a spray tower shall mean an Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 .005
operation utilizing formulations (e.g., pH ........................................ (1) (1)
those with high non-ionic content)
which require a very high rate of wet English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
scrubbing to maintain desirable qual-
ity of stack gases, and thus generate BOD5 ................................... 0.03 0.01
much greater quantities of waste water COD ..................................... 0.15 .05
than can be recycled to process. TSS ...................................... 0.03 .01
(f) The term fast turnaround operation Surfactants ........................... 0.06 .02
of a spray drying tower shall mean op- Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 .005
eration involving more than 6 changes pH ........................................ (1) (1)
of formulation in a 30 consecutive day 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
period that are of such degree and type
(e.g., high phosphate to no phosphate) (b) For air quality restricted oper-
as to require cleaning of the tower to ation of a spray drying tower, but only
maintain minimal product quality. when a high rate of wet scrubbing is in
(g) The term BOD7 shall mean the operation which produces more waste
biochemical oxygen demand as deter- water than can be recycled to process,
mined by incubation at 20 degrees C for the following values pertain:
a period of 7 days using an acclimated
327
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00327 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.153 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
328
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00328 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.155
329
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00329 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.156 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
kg of anhydrous product)
BOD5 .............................................. No limitations.
BOD5 ............................ 0.02 COD ................................................ Do.
COD .............................. 0.07 TSS ................................................. Do.
TSS ............................... 0.02 Surfactants ...................................... Do.
Surfactants .................... 0.02 Oil and grease ................................ Do.
pH ................................................... Do.
Oil and grease .............. 0.005
pH ................................. (1)
(3) For fast turnaround operation of a
English units (pounds per 1,000 lb spray tower, the following values per-
of anhydrous product) tain: The maximum for any one day
BOD5 ............................ 0.02
when the number of turnarounds ex-
COD .............................. 0.07 ceeds six in any particular thirty con-
TSS ............................... 0.02 secutive day period shall be the sum of
Surfactants .................... 0.02 the appropriate value below and that
Oil and grease .............. 0.005
pH ................................. (1) from paragraph (b) (1) or (2) of this sec-
1 Within
tion; and the average of daily values
the range 6.0 to 9.0.
for thirty consecutive days shall be the
§ 417.156 Pretreatment standards for value shown below multiplied by the
new sources. number of turnarounds in excess of six
and prorated to thirty days plus the ap-
Any new source subject to this sub-
propriate value form paragraph (b) (1)
part that introduces process waste-
or (2) of this section.
water pollutants into a publicly owned
treatment works must comply with 40 Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
CFR part 403. In addition, the following
BOD5 .............................................. No limitations.
pretreatment standards establishes the COD ................................................ Do.
quantity or quality of pollutants or TSS ................................................. Do.
330
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00330 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.162
Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard stirrer set at 200 to 500 rpm may be
used.
Surfactants ...................................... Do.
Oil and grease ................................ Do. [39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974, as amended at 40
pH ................................................... Do.
FR 27455, June 30, 1975]
[40 FR 27454, June 30, 1975, as amended at 60 § 417.162 Effluent limitations guide-
FR 33955, June 29, 1995] lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the
Subpart P—Manufacture of Liquid application of the best practicable
control technology currently avail-
Detergents Subcategory able.
§ 417.160 Applicability; description of Except as provided in §§ 125.30
the manufacture of liquid deter- through 125.32, any existing point
gents subcategory. source subject to this subpart shall
The provisions of this subpart are ap- achieve the following effluent limita-
plicable to discharges resulting from tions representing the degree of efflu-
all operations associated with the man- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
ufacture of liquid detergents, com- cation of the best practicable control
mencing with the blending of ingredi- technology currently available (BPT):
ents, to and including bottling or pack- (a) For normal liquid detergent oper-
aging finished products. ations the following values pertain:
§ 417.161 Specialized definitions. Effluent limitations
For the purpose of this subpart: Average of daily
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days
eral definitions, abbreviations and day shall not
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR exceed—
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. Metric units (kilograms per
(b) The term anhydrous product shall 1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
mean the theoretical product that uct)
would result if all water were removed
BOD5 ................................... 0.60 0.20
from the actual product.
COD ..................................... 1.80 .60
(c) The term surfactant shall mean TSS ...................................... 0.015 .005
those methylene blue active substances Surfactants ........................... 0.39 .13
amenable to measurement by the Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 .005
method described in ‘‘Methods for pH ........................................ (1) (1)
Chemical Analysis of Water and
Wastes,’’ 1971, Environmental Protec- English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of anhydrous product)
tion Agency, Analytical Quality Con-
trol Laboratory, page 131. BOD5 ................................... 0.60 0.20
(d) The term normal liquid detergent COD ..................................... 1.80 .60
operations shall mean all such oper- TSS ...................................... 0.015 .005
ations except those defined as fast Surfactants ........................... 0.39 .13
turnaround operation of automated fill Oil and grease ..................... 0.015 .005
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
lines.
(e) The term fast turnaround operation 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
of automated fill lines shall mean an op-
(b) For fast turnaround operation of
eration involving more than 8 changes
automated fill lines, the following val-
of formulation in a 30 consecutive day
period that are of such degree and type ues pertain: the maximum for any one
as to require thorough purging and day when the number of turnarounds
washing of the fill line to maintain exceeds eight in any thirty consecutive
minimal product quality. day period shall be the sum of the ap-
(f) The term BOD7 shall mean the propriate values below and that from
biochemical oxygen demand as deter- paragraph (a) of this section; and the
mined by incubation at 20 degrees C for average of daily values for thirty con-
a period of 7 days using an acclimated secutive days shall be the values shown
seed. Agitation employing a magnetic below multiplied by the number of
331
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00331 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.163 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
English units (pounds per 1,000 lb (b) For fast turnaround operation of
of anhydrous product) automated fill lines, the following val-
ues pertain: The maximum for any one
BOD5 ............................ 0.05.
COD .............................. 0.15.
day when the number of turnarounds
TSS ............................... 0.002. exceeds eight in any thirty consecutive
Surfactants .................... 0.04. day period shall be the sum of the ap-
Oil and grease .............. 0.002. propriate value below and that from
pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. paragraph (a) of this section; and the
average of daily values for thirty con-
[39 FR 13372, Apr. 12, 1974; 39 FR 17841, May secutive days shall be the value shown
21, 1974, as amended at 60 FR 33955, June 29, below multiplied by the number of
1995] turnarounds in excess of eight and pro-
rated to thirty days plus the appro-
§ 417.163 Effluent limitations guide- priate value from paragraph (a) of this
lines representing the degree of ef-
fluent reduction attainable by the section.
application of the best available Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations
technology economically achiev-
able. Metric units (kilograms per 1,000
kg of anhydrous product)
The following limitations establish
the quantity or quality of pollutants or BOD5 ............................ 0.02.
pollutant properties, controlled by this COD .............................. 0.07.
section, which may be discharged by a TSS ............................... 0.002.
Surfactants .................... 0.02.
point source subject to the provisions Oil and grease .............. 0.002.
of this subpart after application of the pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
best available technology economically
achievable: English units (pounds per 1,000 lb
of anhydrous product)
(a) For normal liquid detergent oper-
ations the following values pertain: BOD5 ............................ 0.02.
COD .............................. 0.07.
Effluent limitations TSS ............................... 0.002.
Average of daily Surfactants .................... 0.02.
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 Oil and grease .............. 0.002.
for any 1 consecutive days pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
day shall not
exceed—
§ 417.164 [Reserved]
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
uct)
§ 417.165 Standards of performance for
new sources.
BOD5 ................................... 0.10 0.05 The following standards of perform-
COD ..................................... 0.44 .22 ance establish the quantity or quality
TSS ...................................... 0.01 .005
Surfactants ........................... 0.10 .05
of pollutants or pollutant properties,
Oil and grease ..................... 0.01 .005 controlled by this section, which may
pH ........................................ (1) (1) be discharged by a new source subject
to the provisions of this subpart:
332
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00332 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.166
(a) For normal liquid detergent oper- § 417.166 Pretreatment standards for
ations the following values pertain: new sources.
Effluent limitations Any new source subject to this sub-
part that introduces process waste-
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 water pollutants into a publicly owned
for any 1 consecutive days treatment works must comply with 40
day shall not
exceed— CFR part 403. In addition, the following
pretreatment standard establishes the
Metric units (kilograms per quantity or quality of pollutants or
1,000 kg of anhydrous prod-
uct) pollutant properties, controlled by this
section, which may be discharged to a
BOD5 ................................... 0.10 0.05 publicly owned treatment works by a
COD ..................................... 0.44 .22 new source subject to the provisions of
TSS ...................................... 0.01 .005
Surfactants ........................... 0.10 .05 this subpart.
Oil and grease ..................... 0.01 .005 (a) There shall be no discharge of
pH ........................................ (1) (1) waste water streams in which both the
COD/BOD7 ratio exceeds 10.0 and the
English units (pounds per
1,000 lb of anhydrous product) COD exceeds 1.10 kg/kkg of anhydrous
product.
BOD5 ................................... 0.10 0.05 (b) For waste streams having either a
COD ..................................... 0.44 .22 ratio of COD to BOD7 of 10.0 or less or
TSS ...................................... 0.01 .005
Surfactants ........................... 0.10 .05
having a COD content of 1.10 kg/kkg of
Oil and grease ..................... 0.01 .005 anhydrous product or less the
pH ........................................ (1) (1) pretreatment standard shall be:
1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. (1) For normal liquid detergent oper-
ations the following values pertain:
(b) For fast turnaround operation of
automated fill lines, the following val- Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
ues pertain: The maximum for any one BOD5 .............................................. No limitation.
day when the number of turnarounds COD ................................................ Do.
exceeds eight in any thirty consecutive TSS ................................................. Do.
Surfactants ...................................... Do.
day period shall be the sum of the ap- Oil and grease ................................ Do.
propriate value below and that from pH ................................................... Do.
paragraph (a) of this section; and the
average of daily values for thirty con- (2) For fast turnaround operation of
secutive days shall be the value shown automated fill lines, the following val-
below multiplied by the number of ues pertain; the maximum for any one
turnarounds in excess of eight and pro- day when the number of turnarounds
rated to thirty days plus the appro- exceeds eight in any thirty consecutive
priate value from paragraph (a) of this day period shall be the sum of the ap-
section: propriate value below and that from
paragraph (b)(1) of this section; and the
Effluent characteristic Effluent limitations
average of daily values for thirty con-
Metric units (kilograms per 1,000 secutive days shall be the value shown
kg of anhydrous product) below multiplied by the number of
turnarounds in excess of eight and pro-
BOD5 ............................ 0.02.
COD .............................. 0.07. rated to thirty days plus the appro-
TSS ............................... 0.002. priate value from paragraph (b)(1) of
Surfactants .................... 0.02. this section:
Oil and grease .............. 0.002.
pH ................................. Within the range 6.0 to 9.0. Pollutant or pollutant property Pretreatment standard
333
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00333 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.170 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
334
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00334 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.181
335
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00335 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.182 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
336
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00336 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 417.192
337
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00337 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 417.193 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
338
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00338 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 418
418.12 Effluent limitations and guidelines Subpart D—Ammonium Nitrate
representing the degree of effluent reduc- Subcategory
tion attainable by the application of the
best practicable control technology cur- 418.40 Applicability; description of the am-
rently available. monium nitrate subcategory.
418.13 Effluent limitations and guidelines 418.41 Specialized definitions.
representing the degree of effluent reduc- 418.42 Effluent limitations and guidelines
tion attained by the application of the representing the degree of effluent reduc-
best available technology economically tion attainable by the application of the
achievable. best practicable control technology cur-
418.14 [Reserved] rently available.
418.15 Standards of performance for new 418.43 Effluent limitations and guidelines
sources. representing the degree of effluent reduc-
418.16 Pretreatment standards for new tion attainable by the application of the
sources. best available technology economically
418.17 Effluent limitations quidelines rep- achievable.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 418.44 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best 418.45 Standards of performance for new
conventional pollutant control tech- sources.
nology. 418.46 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
Subpart B—Ammonia Subcategory
Subpart E—Nitric Acid Subcategory
418.20 Applicability; description of the am-
monia subcategory. 418.50 Applicability; description of the ni-
418.21 Specialized definitions. tric acid subcategory.
418.22 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 418.51 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 418.52 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
practicable control technology currently attainable by the application of the best
available. practicable control technology currently
418.23 Effluent limitations quidelines rep- available.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 418.53 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
available technology economically attainable by the application of the best
achievable. available technology economically
418.24 [Reserved] achievable.
418.25 Standards of performance for new 418.54 [Reserved]
sources. 418.55 Standards of performance for new
418.26 Pretreatment standards for new sources.
sources. 418.56 Pretreatment standards for new
418.27 Effluent limitations quidelines rep- sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best Subpart F—Ammonium Sulfate Production
conventional pollutant control tech- Subcategory
nology.
418.60 Applicability; description of the am-
Subpart C—Urea Subcategory monium sulfate production subcategory.
418.61 Specialized definitions.
418.30 Applicability; description of the urea 418.62 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
subcategory. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
418.31 Specialized definitions. attainable by the application of the best
418.32 Effluent limitations and guidelines practicable control technology currently
representing the degree of effluent reduc- available.
tion attainable by the application of the 418.63 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
best practicable control technology cur- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
rently available. attainable by the application of the best
418.33 Effluent limitations and guidelines available technology economically
representing the degree of effluent reduc- achievable.
tion attainable by the application of the 418.64 [Reserved]
best available technology economically 418.65 Standards of performance for new
achievable. sources.
418.34 [Reserved] 418.66 Pretreatment standard for new
418.35 Standards of performance for new sources.
sources. 418.67 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
418.36 Pretreatment standards for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
339
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00339 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
conventional pollutant control tech- (b) The term process wastewater
nology. means any water which, during manu-
facturing or processing, comes into di-
Subpart G—Mixed and Blend Fertilizer rect contact with or results from the
Production Subcategory production or use of any raw material,
418.70 Applicability; description of the intermediate product, finished product,
mixed and blend fertilizer production by-product, or waste product. The term
subcategory. ‘‘process wastewater’’ does not include
418.71 Specialized definitions. contaminated non-process wastewater,
418.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- as defined below.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction (c) The term, contaminated non-proc-
attainable by the application of the best ess wastewater shall mean any water in-
practicable control technology currently
cluding precipitation runoff which,
available.
418.73 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
during manufacturing or processing,
resenting the degree of effluent reduction comes into incidental contact with any
attainable by the application of the best raw material, intermediate product,
available technology economically finished product, by-product or waste
achievable. product by means of: (1) Precipitation
418.74 [Reserved] runoff; (2) accidental spills; (3) acci-
418.75 Standards of performance for new dental leaks caused by the failure of
sources. process equipment and which are re-
418.76 Pretreatment standard for new paired or the discharge of pollutants
sources.
therefrom contained or terminated
418.77 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
within the shortest reasonable time
attainable by the application of the best which shall not exceed 24 hours after
conventional pollutant control tech- discovery or when discovery should
nology. reasonably have been made, whichever
is earliest; and (4) discharges from safe-
AUTHORITY: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
ty showers and related personal safety
SOURCE: 39 FR 12836, April 8, 1974, unless equipment, and from equipment
otherwise noted. washings for the purpose of safe entry,
inspection and maintenance; provided
Subpart A—Phosphate that all reasonable measures have been
Subcategory taken to prevent, reduce, eliminate and
control to the maximum extent fea-
§ 418.10 Applicability; description of sible such contact and provided further
the phosphate subcategory. that all reasonable measures have been
The provisions of this subpart are ap- taken that will mitigate the effects of
plicable to discharges resulting from such contact once it has occurred.
the manufacture of sulfuric acid by sul- (d) The term ten-year 24-hour rainfall
fur burning, wet-process phosphoric event shall mean the maximum 24-hour
acid, normal superphosphate, triple precipitation event with a probable re-
superphosphate and ammonium phos- currence interval of once in 10 years as
phate, except that the provisions of defined by the National Weather Serv-
§§ 418.12, 418.13, and 418.17 shall not ice in technical paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall
apply to wet-process phosphoric acid Frequency Atlas of the United States’’,
processes that were under construction May 1961, and subsequent amendments
either on or before April 8, 1974, at in effect as of the effective date of this
plants located in the State of Lou- regulation.
isiana. (e) The term 25-year 24-hour rainfall
event shall mean the maximum 24-hour
[52 FR 28432, July 29, 1987] precipitation event with a probable re-
currence interval of once in 25 years as
§ 418.11 Specialized definitions. defined by the National Weather Serv-
For the purpose of this subpart: ice in technical paper No. 40, ‘‘Rainfall
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- Frequency Atlas of the United States’’,
eral definitions, abbreviations and May 1961, and subsequent amendments
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR in effect, as of the effective date of this
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. regulation.
340
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00340 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.13
(f) The term calcium sulfate storage suant to the limitations of paragraph
pile runoff shall mean the calcium sul- (b) shall not exceed the values listed in
fate transport water runoff from or the following table:
through the calcium sulfate pile, and
Effluent limitations (mg/l)
the precipitation which falls directly
on the storage pile and which may be Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
collected in a seepage ditch at the base for any 1 consecutive days
of the outer slopes of the storage pile, day shall not
exceed—
provided such seepage ditch is pro-
tected from the incursion of surface Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35
runoff from areas outside of the outer Fluoride ................................ 75 25
TSS ...................................... 150 50
perimeter of the seepage ditch.
[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 The total suspended solid limitation
FR 20583, May 19, 1976] set forth in this paragraph shall be
waived for process wastewater from a
§ 418.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent calcium sulfate storage pile runoff fa-
reduction attainable by the applica- cility, operated separately or in com-
tion of the best practicable control bination with a water recirculation
technology currently available. system, which is chemically treated
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 and then clarified or settled to meet
through 125.32, any existing point the other pollutant limitations set
source subject to this subpart shall forth in this paragraph.
achieve the following effluent limita- (d) The concentration of pollutants
tions representing the degree of efflu- discharged in contaminated non-proc-
ent reduction attainable by the appli- ess wastewater shall not exceed the
cation of the best practicable control values listed in the following table:
technology currently available (BPT): Effluent limitations (mg/l)
(a) Subject to the provisions of para- Average of daily
graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
following limitations establish the for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
quantity or quality of pollutants or exceed—
pollutant properties, controlled by this
Total phosphorus (as P) ...... 105 35
section, which may be discharged by a Fluoride ................................ 75 25
point source subject to the provisions
of this subpart after application of the
[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41
best practicable control technology
FR 20584, May 19, 1976; 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25,
currently available: There shall be no 1977; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]
discharge of process wastewater pollut-
ants to navigable waters. § 418.13 Effluent limitations and guide-
(b) Process wastewater pollutants lines representing the degree of ef-
from a calcium sulfate storage pile fluent reduction attained by the ap-
runoff facility operated separately or plication of the best available tech-
in combination with a water recircula- nology economically achievable.
tion system designed, constructed and The following limitations establish
operated to maintain a surge capacity the quantity or quality of pollutants or
equal to the runoff from the 10-year, 24- pollutant properties which may be dis-
hour rainfall event may be discharged, charged by a point source subject to
after treatment to the standards set the provisions of this subpart after ap-
forth in paragraph (c) of this section, plication of the best available tech-
whenever chronic or catastrophic pre- nology economically achievable:
cipitation events cause the water level (a) Subject to the provision of para-
to rise into the surge capacity. Process graphs (b) and (c) of this section, the
wastewater must be treated and dis- following limitations establish the
charged whenever the water level quantity or quality of pollutants or
equals or exceeds the mid point of the pollutant properties, controlled by this
surge capacity. section, which may be discharged by a
(c) The concentration of pollutants point source subject to the provisions
discharged in process wastewater pur- of this subpart after application of the
341
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00341 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.14 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
342
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00342 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.20
343
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00343 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.21 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
and cooling tower blowdown are ex- source subject to this subpart shall
cluded. achieve the following effluent limita-
[44 FR 64081, Nov. 6, 1979] tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
§ 418.21 Specialized definitions. cation of the best practicable control
For the purposes of this subpart: technology currently available (BPT):
(a) Except as provided below the gen- Effluent limitations
eral definitions, abbreviations and
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
part 401 shall apply to this subpart. for any 1 consecutive days
(b) The term product shall mean the day shall not
exceed—
anhydrous ammonia content of the
compound manufactured. Metric units (kilograms per
(c) The term shipping losses shall 1,000 kg of product)
mean: Discharges resulting from load-
Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.1875 0.0625
ing tank cars or tank trucks; dis-
pH ........................................ (1) (1)
charges resulting from cleaning tank
cars or tank trucks; and discharges English units (pounds per
from air pollution control scrubbers de- 1,000 lb of product)
signed to control emissions from load-
ing or cleaning tank cars or tank Ammonia (as N) ................... 0.1875 0.0625
trucks. pH ........................................ (1) (1)
(d) The term process wastewater shall 1 Within the range 6.0 to 9.0.
mean any water which, during manu-
facturing or processing, comes into di- [39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 40
rect contact with or results from the FR 26275, June 23, 1975: 60 FR 33956, June 29,
production or use of any raw material, 1995]
intermediate product, finished product,
by-product, or waste product. The term § 418.23 Effluent limitations quidelines
process wastewater does not include representing the degree of effluent
non-contact cooling water, as defined reduction attainable by the applica-
below. tion of the best available tech-
(e) The term non-contact cooling water nology economically achievable.
shall mean water which is used in a Except as provided in §§ 125.30
cooling system designed so as to main- through 125.32, the following limita-
tain constant separation of the cooling tions establish the quantity or quality
medium from all contact with process of pollutants or pollutant properties,
chemicals but which may on the occa- which may be discharged by a point
sion of corrosion, cooling system leak- source subject to the provisions of this
age or similar cooling system failures subpart after application of the best
contain small amounts of process available technology economically
chemicals: Provided, That all reason- achievable.
able measures have been taken to pre-
vent, reduce, eliminate and control to Effluent limitations
the maximum extent feasible such con- Average of
tamination: And provided further, That Effluent characteristic daily values
all reasonable measures have been Maximum for for 30 con-
any 1 day secutive days
taken that will mitigate the effects of shall not
such contamination once it has oc- exceed—
curred. Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 kg of product)
[44 FR 64082, Nov. 6, 1979]
Ammonia (as N) ................ 0.05 0.025
§ 418.22 Effluent limitations guidelines
representing the degree of effluent English units (pounds per 1,000
reduction attainable by the applica- lb of product)
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available. Ammonia (as N) ................ 0.05 0.025
344
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00344 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.32
345
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00345 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.33 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
346
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00346 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.42
347
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00347 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
348
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00348 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.53
(d) The term shipped liquid ammonia duction in which all the raw material
shall mean liquid ammonia commer- ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:
cially shipped for which the Depart- [Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
ment of Transportation requires 0.2 product]
percent minimum water content. Effluent limitations
(e) The term non-contact cooling water
Average of daily
shall mean water which is used in a Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
cooling system designed so as to main- for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not
tain constant separation of the cooling exceed—
medium from all contact with process
chemicals but which may on the occa- Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008
Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.33 0.044
sion of corrosion, cooling system leak-
age or similar cooling system failures
contain small amounts of process [39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41
chemicals: Provided, That all reason- FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976; 42 FR 16141, Mar. 25,
1977; 60 FR 33956, June 29, 1995]
able measures have been taken to pre-
vent, reduce, eliminate and control to § 418.53 Effluent limitations guidelines
the maximum extent feasible such con- representing the degree of effluent
tamination: And provided further, That reduction attainable by the applica-
all reasonable measures have been tion of the best available tech-
taken that will mitigate the effects of nology economically achievable.
such contamination once it has oc- The following limitations establish
curred. the quantity or quality of pollutants or
[39 FR 12836, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 41 pollutant properties which may be dis-
FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976] charged by a point source subject to
the provisions of this subpart after ap-
§ 418.52 Effluent limitations guidelines plication of the best available tech-
representing the degree of effluent nology economically achievable:
reduction attainable by the applica- (a) The following limitations estab-
tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available. lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants which may be discharged in proc-
Except as provided in §§ 125.30 ess waste water from nitric acid pro-
through 125.32, any existing point duction in which all the raw material
source subject to this subpart shall ammonia is in the gaseous form:
achieve the following effluent limita- [Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
tions representing the degree of efflu- product]
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
Effluent limitations
cation of the best practicable control
technology currently available (BPT): Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
(a) The following limitations estab- for any 1 consecutive days
lish the quantity or quality of pollut- day shall not
exceed—
ants which may be discharged in proc-
ess waste water from nitric acid pro- Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045
duction in which all the raw material Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023
ammonia is in the gaseous form:
[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
(b) The following limitations estab-
product] lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants which may be discharged in proc-
Effluent limitations
ess waste water from nitric acid pro-
Average of daily duction in which all the raw material
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
for any 1 consecutive days ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:
day shall not [Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
exceed— product]
349
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00349 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.54 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
product] § 418.56 Pretreatment standards for
new sources.
Effluent limitations The pretreatment standards under
Average of daily section 307(c) of the Act for a source
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 within the nitric acid subcategory,
for any 1 consecutive days
day shall not which is a user of a publicly owned
exceed— treatment works (and which would be a
Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023 new source subject to section 306 of the
Act, if it were to discharge pollutants
to the navigable waters), shall be the
[41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42
FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]
standard set forth in part 128 of this
chapter, except that, for the purpose of
§ 418.54 [Reserved] this section, § 128.133 of this chapter
shall be amended to read as follows: In
§ 418.55 Standards of performance for addition to the prohibitions set forth
new sources. in § 128.131 of this chapter, the fol-
lowing pretreatment standard estab-
The following standards of perform-
lishes the quantity or quality of pollut-
ance establish the quantity or quality
ants or pollutant properties controlled
of pollutants or pollutant properties
by this section which may be dis-
which may be discharged by a new
charged to publicly owned treatment
source subject to the provisions of this
works by a new source subject to the
subpart:
provisions of this subpart:
(a) The following limitations estab- (a) The following limitations estab-
lish the quantity or quality of pollut- lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants which may be discharged in proc- ants which may be discharged in proc-
ess waste water from nitric acid pro- ess waste water from nitric acid pro-
duction in which all the raw material duction in which all the raw material
ammonia is in the gaseous form: ammonia is in the gaseous form:
[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
product] [Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
product]
Effluent limitations
Effluent limitations
Average of daily
Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30 Average of daily
for any 1 consecutive days Effluent characteristic Maximum values for 30
day shall not for any 1 consecutive days
exceed— day shall not
exceed—
Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045 Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.0045 0.00045
Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023
(b) The following limitations estab- (b) The following limitations estab-
lish the quantity or quality of pollut- lish the quantity or quality of pollut-
ants which may be discharged in proc- ants which may be discharged in proc-
ess waste water from nitric acid pro- ess waste water from nitric acid pro-
duction in which all the raw material duction in which all the raw material
ammonia is in the shipped liquid form: ammonia is in the shipped liquid form:
[Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of [Metric units, kg/kkg of product; English units, lb/1,000 lb of
product] product]
Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008 Ammonia (as N) .................. 0.08 0.008
Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023 Nitrate (as N) ....................... 0.17 0.023
[41 FR 2387, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42 [41 FR 2388, Jan. 16, 1976, as amended at 42
FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977] FR 16141, Mar. 25, 1977]
350
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00350 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 418.67
351
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00351 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 418.70 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
352
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00352 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 419
353
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00353 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.10 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
available technology economically wastewaters in the main treatment
achievable (BAT). system.
419.54 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (d) The term feedstock shall mean the
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
crude oil and natural gas liquids fed to
conventional pollutant control tech- the topping units.
nology (BCT). (e) The term once-through cooling
419.55 Pretreatment standards for existing water shall mean those waters dis-
sources (PSES). charged that are used for the purpose
419.56 Standards of performance for new of heat removal and that do not come
sources (NSPS). into direct contact with any raw mate-
419.57 Pretreatment standards for new rial, intermediate, or finished product.
sources (PSNS).
(f) The following abbreviations shall
APPENDIX A TO PART 419—PROCESSES IN-
be used: (1) Mgal means one thousand
CLUDED IN THE DETERMINATION OF BAT
EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS FOR TOTAL CHRO- gallons; (2) Mbbl means one thousand
MIUM, HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM, AND PHE- barrels (one barrel is equivalent to 42
NOLIC COMPOUNDS (4AAP) gallons).
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b), (c), (e), and
(g) The term contaminated runoff
(g), 306 (b) and (c), 307 (b) and (c), and 501 of shall mean runoff which comes into
the Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pol- contact with any raw material, inter-
lution Control Act Amendments of 1972 as mediate product, finished product, by-
amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977) (the product or waste product located on pe-
‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314 (b), (c), (e), and troleum refinery property.
(g), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317 (b) and (c), and 1361;
86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, Pub. [47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50
L. 95–217. FR 28522, July 12, 1985]
SOURCE: 47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, unless § 419.12 Effluent limitations guidelines
otherwise noted. representing the degree of effluent
reduction attainable by the applica-
Subpart A—Topping Subcategory tion of the best practicable control
technology currently available
§ 419.10 Applicability; description of (BPT).
the topping subcategory. (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
The provisions of this subpart apply 125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
to discharges from any facility that source subject to this subpart must
produces petroleum products by the achieve the following effluent limita-
use of topping and catalytic reforming, tions representing the degree of efflu-
whether or not the facility includes ent reduction attainable by the appli-
any other process in addition to top- cation of the best practicable control
ping and catalytic reforming. The pro- technology currently available (BPT):
visions of this subpart do not apply to
BPT Effluent Limitations
facilities that include thermal proc-
esses (coking, vis-breaking, etc.) or Average of
daily values
catalytic cracking. Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for for 30 con-
any 1 day secutive days
§ 419.11 Specialized definitions. shall not
exceed
For the purpose of this subpart:
Metric units (kilograms per
(a) Except as provided below, the gen- 1,000 m3 of feedstock)
eral definitions, abbreviations, and
methods of analysis set forth in part BOD5 ..................................... 22.7 12.0
401 of this chapter shall apply to this TSS ........................................ 15.8 10.1
subpart. COD 1 ..................................... 117.0 60.3
(b) The term runoff shall mean the Oil and grease ....................... 6.9 3.7
flow of storm water resulting from pre- Phenolic compounds ............. 0.168 0.076
Ammonia as N ....................... 2.81 1.27
cipitation coming into contact with pe-
Sulfide .................................... 0.149 0.068
troleum refinery property. Total chromium ...................... 0.345 0.20
(c) The term ballast shall mean the Hexavalent chromium ............ 0.028 0.012
flow of waters, from a ship, that is pH .......................................... 2
( ) 2
( )
treated along with refinery
354
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00354 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.12
355
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00355 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
356
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00356 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.13
357
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00357 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.14 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
358
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00358 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.14
359
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00359 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.15 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
360
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00360 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.17
1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor NSPS Effluent Limita-
tions for Ballast Water
50.0 to 74.9 ......................................................... 1.16
75.0 to 99.9 ......................................................... 1.26 Average of
daily val-
100 to 124.9 ........................................................ 1.38 Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum ues for 30
125.0 to 149.9 ..................................................... 1.50 for any 1 consecu-
150.0 or greater ................................................... 1.57 day tive days
shall not
exceed
(2) Process factor.
pH .................................................. (2) (2)
Process
Process configuration factor
English units (pounds
Less than 2.49 ..................................................... 0.62 per 1,000 gal of flow)
2.5 to 3.49 ........................................................... 0.67
3.5 to 4.49 ........................................................... 0.80 BOD5 ............................................. 0.40 0.21
4.5 to 5.49 ........................................................... 0.95 TSS ................................................ 0.27 0.17
5.5 to 5.99 ........................................................... 1.07 COD 1 ............................................. 3.9 2.0
6.0 to 6.49 ........................................................... 1.17 Oil and grease ............................... 0.126 0.067
6.5 to 6.99 ........................................................... 1.27 pH .................................................. (2) (2)
7.0 to 7.49 ........................................................... 1.39 1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d).
7.5 to 7.99 ........................................................... 1.51 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0
8.0 to 8.49 ........................................................... 1.64
8.5 to 9.99 ........................................................... 1.79 (d) The quantity and quality of pol-
9.0 to 9.49 ........................................................... 1.95 lutants or pollutant properties con-
9.5 to 9.99 ........................................................... 2.12
10.0 to 10.49 ....................................................... 2.31
trolled by this paragraph, attributable
10.5 to 10.99 ....................................................... 2.51 to once-through cooling water, are ex-
11.0 to 11.49 ....................................................... 2.73 cluded from the discharge allowed by
11.5 to 11.99 ....................................................... 2.98 paragraph (b) of this section. Once-
12.0 to 12.49 ....................................................... 3.24
12.5 to 12.99 ....................................................... 3.53
through cooling water may be dis-
13.0 to 13.49 ....................................................... 3.84 charged with a total organic carbon
13.5 to 13.99 ....................................................... 4.18 concentration not to exceed 5 mg/l.
14.0 or greater ..................................................... 4.36 (e) Effluent limitations for runoff. [Re-
served]
(3) See the comprehensive example in
subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3). [47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50
FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12,
(c) The following allocations con-
1985]
stitute the quantity and quality of pol-
lutants or pollutant properties con- § 419.17 Pretreatment standards for
trolled by this paragraph and attrib- new sources (PSNS).
utable to ballast, which may be dis- Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
charged after the application of best any new source subject to this subpart
practicable control technology cur- which introduces pollutants into a pub-
rently available, by a point source sub- licly owned treatment works must
ject to this subpart, in addition to the comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
discharge allowed by paragraph (b) of achieve the following pretreatment
this section. The allocation allowed for standards for new sources (PSNS).
ballast water flow, as kg/cu m (lb/ (a) The following standards apply to
Mgal), shall be based on those ballast the total refinery flow contribution to
waters treated at the refinery. the POTW:
NSPS Effluent Limita-
tions for Ballast Water Pretreatment
standards
Average of for new
Pollutant or pollutant property
daily val- sources—
Pollutant or pollutant property maximum for
Maximum ues for 30
for any 1 consecu- any 1 day
day tive days
shall not Milligrams
exceed per liter (mg/
1)
Metric units (kilograms
per cubic meter of flow) Oil and grease .................................................. 100
Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1 100
BOD5 ............................................. 0.048 0.026 1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour
TSS ................................................ 0.033 0.021 waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying
COD 1 ............................................. 0.47 0.24 with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-
Oil and grease ............................... 0.015 0.008 nia set forth in § 419.16 (a) and (b).
361
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00361 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
362
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00362 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.23
363
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00363 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.23 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
364
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00364 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.24
365
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00365 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.25 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
366
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00366 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.27
sources (PSES). The following stand- (b) The limits set forth in paragraph
ards apply to the total refinery flow (a) of this section are to be multiplied
contribution to the POTW: by the following factors to calculate
the maximum for any 1 day and max-
Pretreatment
standards imum average of daily values for 30
Pollutant or pollutant property for new consecutive days.
sources—
maximum for (1) Size Factor.
any 1 day
Size
1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day
Milligrams factor
per liter (mg/
Less than 24.9 ....................................................... 0.91
l)
25.0 to 49.9 ........................................................... 0.95
50.0 to 74.9 ........................................................... 1.04
Oil and grease .................................................. 100 75.0 to 99.9 ........................................................... 1.13
Ammonia ........................................................... 1 100 100.0 to 124.9 ....................................................... 1.23
125.0 to 149.9 ....................................................... 1.35
1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour
150.0 or greater ..................................................... 1.41
waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying
with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-
nia set forth in § 419.23 (a) and (b). (2) Process factor.
367
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00367 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.30 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
368
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00368 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.32
369
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00369 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.33 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
370
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00370 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.33
371
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00371 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.34 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 Process
Process configuration
FR 28523, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, Aug. 12, factor
1985]
4.5 to 5.49 ......................................................... 0.80
5.5 to 5.99 ......................................................... 0.91
§ 419.34 Effluent limitations guidelines
6.0 to 6.49 ......................................................... 0.99
representing the degree of effluent 6.5 to 6.99 ......................................................... 1.08
reduction attainable by the applica- 7.0 to 7.49 ......................................................... 1.17
tion of the best conventional pollut- 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.28
ant control technology (BCT). 8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.39
(a) Any existing point source subject 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.51
to this subpart must achieve the fol- 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.65
9.5 or greater ..................................................... 1.72
lowing effluent limitations rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduc-
tion attainable by the application of (3) See the comprehensive example in
the best conventional pollutant control subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).
technology (BCT): (c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply
to discharges of process wastewater
BCT effluent limitations pollutants attributable to ballast
Average of water by a point source subject to the
daily values
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for 30 con- provisions of this subpart.
for any 1 secutive days (d) The quantity and quality of pol-
day shall not
exceed lutants or pollutant properties con-
trolled by this paragraph, attributable
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 m3 of feedstock) to once-through cooling water, are ex-
cluded from the discharge allowed by
BOD5 ....................................... 34.6 18.4 paragraph (b) of this section.
TSS .......................................... 23.4 14.8 (e) Effluent limitations for contami-
Oil and grease ......................... 11.1 5.9
pH ............................................ (1) (1) nated runoff. The following effluent
limitations constitute the quantity
English units (pounds per and quality of pollutants or pollutant
1,000 bbl of feedstock) properties controlled by this paragraph
and attributable to contaminated run-
BOD5 ....................................... 12.1 6.5
TSS .......................................... 8.3 5.25 off which may be discharged after the
Oil and grease ......................... 3.9 2.1 application of the best conventional
pH ............................................ (1) (1) pollutant control technology by a
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0. point source subject to this subpart.
(b) The limits set forth in paragraph (1) If wastewater consists solely of
(a) of this section are to be multiplied contaminated runoff and is not com-
by the following factors to calculate mingled or treated with process waste-
the maximum for any one day and water, it may be discharged if it does
maximum average of daily values for not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based
thirty consecutive days. upon an analysis of any single grab or
(1) Size factor. composite sample.
(2) If contaminated runoff is commin-
1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor
gled or treated with process waste-
Less than 24.9 ................................................... 0.73 water, or if wastewater consisting sole-
25.0 to 49.9 ....................................................... 0.76 ly of contaminated runoff which ex-
50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 0.83
75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 0.91 ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-
100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 0.99 mingled or treated with any other type
125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 1.08 of wastewater, the quantity of pollut-
150.0 or greater ................................................. 1.13
ants discharged shall not exceed the
(2) Process factor. quantity determined by multiplying
the flow of contaminated runoff as de-
Process termined by the permit writer times
Process configuration factor
the concentrations listed in the fol-
Less than 4.49 ................................................... 0.73 lowing table:
372
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00372 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.36
1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour (2) Process factor.
waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying
with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo- Process
Process configuration
nia set forth in § 419.33 (a) and (b). factor
373
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00373 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.37 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
374
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00374 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.42
BPT effluent limitations 1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor
Capacity Capacity
(1,000 bbl Weighting Processing
Process relative to
per stream Factor configuration
throughput
day)
Crude:
Atm .................................................................................................... 125.0 1.0 ................ ....................
Vacuum ............................................................................................. 60.0 0.48 ................ ....................
Desalting ............................................................................................ 125.0 1.0 ................ ....................
Total ............................................................................................... ...................... 2.48 ×1 =2.48
Cracking–FCC .......................................................................................... 41.0 0.328 ................ ....................
Hydrocracking ........................................................................................... 20.0 0.160 ................ ....................
Total ............................................................................................... ...................... 0.488 ×6 =2.93
Lubes ........................................................................................................ 5.3 0.042 ................ ....................
4.0 0.032 ................ ....................
4.9 0.039 ................ ....................
Total ............................................................................................... ...................... 0.113 ×13 =1.47
Asphalt ...................................................................................................... 4.0 0.032 ×12 = .38
Refinery process configuration ................................................................. ...................... .................. ................ =7.26
Notes:
See Table § 419.42(b)(2) for process factor. Process factor=0.88.
See Table § 419.42(b)(1) for size factor for 125,000 bbl per stream day lube refinery. Size factor=0.97.
375
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00375 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
To calculate the limits for each parameter, multiply the limit § 419.42(a) by both the process factor and size factor. BOD5 limit
(maximum for any 1 day)=17.9×0.88×0.97=15.3 lb. per 1,000 bbl of feedstock.
376
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00376 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.43
achieve the following effluent limita- (3) See the comprehensive example in
tions representing the degree of efflu- subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3).
ent reduction attainable by the appli- (c)(1) In addition to the provisions
cation of the best available technology contained above pertaining to COD,
economically achievable (BAT): ammonia and sulfide, any existing
point source subject to this subpart
BAT effluent limitations
must achieve the following effluent
Average of limitations representing the degree of
daily val-
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum ues for 30 effluent reduction attainable by the ap-
for any 1 consecu- plication of the best available tech-
day tive days
shall not nology economically achievable (BAT):
exceed (i) For each of the regulated pollut-
ant parameters listed below, the efflu-
Metric units (kilograms
per ent limitation for a given refinery is
the sum of the products of each efflu-
COD 1 ............................................. 360.0 187.0 ent limitation factor times the applica-
Ammonia as N ............................... 23.4 10.6 ble process feedstock rate, calculated
Sulfide ............................................ 0.33 0.150 as provided in 40 CFR 122.45(b). Appli-
cable production processes are pre-
English units (pounds
per 1,000 bbl of feed-
sented in appendix A, by process type.
stock) The process identification numbers
presented in this appendix A are for the
COD 1 ............................................. 127.0 66.0 convenience of the reader. They can be
Ammonia as N ............................... 8.3 3.8 cross-referenced in the Development
Sulfide ............................................ 0.118 0.053
Document for Effluent Limitations Guide-
1 See footnote following table in § 419.13(d). lines, New Source Performance Standards,
(b) The limits set forth in paragraph and Pretreatment Standards for the Pe-
(a) of this section are to be multiplied troleum Refining Point Source Category
by the following factors to calculate (EPA 440/1–82/014), Table III–7, pp. 49–54.
the maximum for any one day and BAT effluent limitation factor
maximum average of daily values for
Average of
thirty consecutive days. Pollutant or pollutant property daily values
(1) Size factor. and process type Maximum for for 30 con-
any 1 day secutive days
Size shall not
1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day exceed
factor
377
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00377 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
378
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00378 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.44
BAT effluent limitations for 1,000 bbl of feedstock per stream day Size factor
contaminated runoff
Less than 49.9 ................................................... 0.71
Average of 50.0 to 74.9 ....................................................... 0.74
Pollutant or pollutant property daily values
Maximum for for 30 con- 75.0 to 99.9 ....................................................... 0.81
any 1 day secutive days 100.0 to 124.9 ................................................... 0.88
shall not 125.0 to 149.9 ................................................... 0.97
exceed 150.0 to 174.9 ................................................... 1.05
175.0 to 199.9 ................................................... 1.14
Hexavalent chromium ............ 0.00052 0.00023 200.0 or greater ................................................. 1.19
COD 1 ..................................... 3.0 1.5
1 In any case in which the applicant can demonstrate that
(2) Process factor.
the chloride ion concentration in the effluent exceeds 1,000
mg/l (1,000 ppm), the permitting authority may substitute TOC
as a parameter in lieu of COD. A TOC effluent limitation shall Process
Process configuration
be based on effluent data from the particular refinery which factor
correlates TOC to BOD5. If in the judgement of the permitting
authority, adequate correlation data are not available, the ef- Less than 6.49 ................................................... 0.81
fluent limitations for TOC shall be established at a ratio of 2.2 6.5 to 7.49 ......................................................... 0.88
to 1 to the applicable effluent limitations for BOD5 7.5 to 7.99 ......................................................... 1.00
8.0 to 8.49 ......................................................... 1.09
[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 8.5 to 8.99 ......................................................... 1.19
FR 28523, 28524, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, 9.0 to 9.49 ......................................................... 1.29
Aug. 12, 1985] 9.5 to 9.99 ......................................................... 1.41
10.0 to 10.49 ..................................................... 1.53
10.5 to 10.99 ..................................................... 1.67
§ 419.44 Effluent limitations guidelines 11.0 to 11.49 ..................................................... 1.82
representing the degree of effluent 11.5 to 11.99 ..................................................... 1.98
reduction attainable by the applica- 12.0 to 12.49 ..................................................... 2.15
tion of the best conventional pollut- 12.5 to 12.99 ..................................................... 2.34
ant control technology (BCT). 13.0 or greater ................................................... 2.44
(a) Any existing point source subject
to this subpart must achieve the fol- (c) The provisions of § 419.14(c) apply
lowing effluent limitations rep- to discharges of process wastewater
resenting the degree of effluent reduc- pollutants attributable to ballast
tion attainable by the application of water by a point source subject to the
the best conventional pollutant control provisions of this subpart.
technology (BCT): (d) The quantity and quality of pol-
lutants or pollutant properties con-
BCT effluent limitations trolled by this paragraph, attributable
Average of to once-through cooling water, are ex-
daily values cluded from the discharge allowed by
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for 30 con-
for any 1 paragraph (b) of this section.
secutive
day days shall (e) Effluent limitations for contami-
not exceed
nated runoff. The following effluent
Metric units (kilograms per limitations constitute the quantity
1,000 m3 of feedstock and quality of pollutants or pollutant
properties controlled by this paragraph
BOD5 ......................................... 50.6 25.8
TSS ............................................ 35.6 22.7 and attributable to contaminated run-
Oil and Grease .......................... 16.2 8.5 off which may be discharged after the
pH .............................................. (1) (1) application of the best conventional
pollutant control technology by a
English units (pounds per
1,000 bbl of feedstock)
point source subject to this subpart.
(1) If wastewater consists solely of
BOD5 ......................................... 17.9 9.1 contaminated runoff and is not com-
TSS ............................................ 12.5 8.0 mingled or treated with process waste-
Oil and Grease .......................... 5.7 3.0
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
water, it may be discharged if it does
not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
upon an analysis of any single grab or
(b) The limits set forth in paragraph composite sample.
(a) of this section are to be multiplied (2) If contaminated runoff is commin-
by the following factors to calculate gled or treated with process waste-
the maximum for any one day and water, or if wastewater consisting sole-
maximum average of daily values for ly of contaminated runoff which ex-
thirty consecutive days. ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-
(1) Size factor. mingled or treated with any other type
379
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00379 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.45 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
380
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00380 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.52
Process Pretreatment
Process configuration factor standards for new
Pollutant or pollutant property sources, max-
6.5 to 7.49 ............................................................. 0.88 imum for any 1
day
7.5 to 7.99 ............................................................. 1.00
8.0 to 8.49 ............................................................. 1.09 Ammonia (as N) ...................................... 1 100
8.5 to 8.99 ............................................................. 1.19
1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour
9.0 to 9.49 ............................................................. 1.29
waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying
9.5 to 9.99 ............................................................. 1.41 with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-
10.0 to 10.49 ......................................................... 1.53 nia set forth in § 419.46 (a) and (b).
10.5 to 10.99 ......................................................... 1.67
11.0 to 11.49 ......................................................... 1.82 (b) The following standard is applied
11.5 to 11.99 ......................................................... 1.98 to the cooling tower discharge part of
12.0 to 12.49 ......................................................... 2.15 the total refinery flow to the POTW by
12.5 to 12.99 ......................................................... 2.34 multiplying: (1) The standard; (2) by
13.0 or greater ....................................................... 2.44 the total refinery flow to the POTW;
and (3) by the ratio of the cooling
(3) See the comprehensive example in tower discharge flow to the total refin-
subpart D, § 419.42(b)(3). ery flow.
(c) The provisions of § 419.16(c) apply
Pretreatment
to discharges of process wastewater standards for new
pollutants attributable to ballast Pollutant or pollutant property sources, max-
imum for any 1
water by a point source subject to the day
provision of this subpart.
Milligrams per
(d) The quantity and quality of pol- liter (mg/l)
lutants or pollutant properties con-
trolled by this paragraph, attributable Total chromium ........................................ 1
to once-through cooling water, are ex-
cluded from the discharge allowed by
paragraph (b) of this section. Once-
Subpart E—Integrated
through cooling water may be dis-
Subcategory
charged with a total organic carbon § 419.50 Applicability; description of
concentration not to exceed 5 mg/1. the integrated subcategory.
(e) Effluent Limitations for Runoff. The provisions of this subpart are ap-
[Reserved] plicable to all discharges resulting
[47 FR 46446, Oct. 18, 1982, as amended at 50 from any facility that produces petro-
FR 28523, 28528, July 12, 1985; 50 FR 32414, leum products by the use of topping,
Aug. 12, 1985] cracking, lube oil manufacturing proc-
esses, and petrochemical operations,
§ 419.47 Pretreatment standards for whether or not the facility includes
new sources (PSNS). any process in addition to topping,
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, cracking, lube oil manufacturing proc-
any new source subject to this subpart esses, and petrochemical operations.
which introduces pollutants into a pub-
§ 419.51 Specialized definitions.
licly owned treatment works must
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and The general definitions, abbrevia-
achieve the following pretreatment tions, and methods of analysis set forth
standards for new sources (PSNS). in part 401 of this chapter and the spe-
(a) The following standards apply to cialized definitions set forth in § 419.31
the total refinery flow contribution to shall apply to this subpart.
the POTW:
§ 419.52 Effluent limitations guidelines
Pretreatment representing the degree of effluent
standards for new reduction attainable by the applica-
Pollutant or pollutant property sources, max- tion of the best practicable control
imum for any 1
day technology currently available
(BPT).
Milligrams per
liter (mg/l)
(a) Except as provided in 40 CFR
125.30 through 125.32, any existing point
Oil and grease ......................................... 100 source subject to this subpart must
381
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00381 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.52 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
382
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00382 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.53
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property daily values daily val-
Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum for for 30 con- Maximum ues for 30
any 1 day secutive days for any 1 consecu-
shall not day tive days
exceed shall not
exceed
Metric units (kilograms per
1,000 m3 of flow) Metric units (kilograms
per 1,000 m3 of feed-
stock)
BOD5 ..................................... 48. 26.
TSS ........................................ 33. 21.
COD 1 ............................................. 388.0 198.0
COD 1 ..................................... 360. 180. Ammonia as N ............................... 23.4 10.6
Oil and grease ....................... 15. 8. Sulfide ............................................ 0.35 0.158
Phenolic compounds (4AAP) 0.35 0.17
Total chromium ...................... 0.73 0.43 English units (pounds
Hexavalent chromium ............ 0.062 0.028 per 1,000 bbl of feed-
pH .......................................... 2
( ) 2
( ) stock)
383
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00383 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.53 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
384
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00384 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.54
385
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00385 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 419.55 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(e) Effluent limitations for contami- lutants into a publicly owned treat-
nated runoff. The following effluent ment works must comply with 40 CFR
limitations constitute the quantity 403 and achieve the following
and quality of pollutants or pollutant pretreatment standards for existing
properties controlled by this paragraph sources (PSES). The following stand-
and attributable to contaminated run- ards apply to the total refinery flow
off which may be discharged after the contribution to the POTW:
application of the best conventional
pollutant control technology by a Pretreatment
standards
point source subject to this subpart. Pollutant or pollutant property for existing
(1) If wastewater consists solely of sources—
maximum for
contaminated runoff and is not com- any 1 day
mingled or treated with process waste-
Milligrams
water, it may be discharged if it does per liter (mg/
not exceed 15 mg/l oil and grease based l)
upon an analysis of any single grab or
composite sample. Oil and grease .................................................. 100
(2) If contaminated runoff is commin- Ammonia (as N) ................................................ 1100
gled or treated with process waste- 1 Where the discharge to the POTW consists solely of sour
water, or if wastewater consisting sole- waters, the owner or operator has the option of complying
with this limit or the daily maximum mass limitation for ammo-
ly of contaminated runoff which ex- nia set forth in § 419.53 (a) and (b).
ceeds 15 mg/l oil and grease is not com-
mingled or treated with any other type § 419.56 Standards of performance for
of wastewater, the quantity of pollut- new sources (NSPS).
ants discharged shall not exceed the (a) Any new source subject to this
quantity determined by multiplying subpart must achieve the following
the flow of contaminated runoff as de- new source performance standards
termined by the permit writer times (NSPS):
the concentrations listed in the fol-
lowing table: NSPS effluent limitation
Average of
BCT effluent limitations daily val-
for contaminated runoff Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum ues for 30
for any 1 consecu-
Average of day tive days
Pollutant or pollutant property daily values shall not
Maximum for 30 con- exceed
for any 1 secutive
day days shall
not exceed Metric units (kilograms
per 1,000 m 3 of feed-
Metric units (kilograms per stock)
1,000 m 3 of feedstock)
BOD5 ............................................. 41.6 22.1
TSS ................................................ 28.1 17.9
BOD5 ......................................... 48. 26.
TSS ............................................ 33. 21. COD 1 ............................................. 295.0 152.0
Oil and grease ........................... 15. 8. Oil and grease ............................... 12.6 6.7
pH .............................................. (1) (1) Phenolic compounds ..................... 0.30 0.14
Ammonia as N ............................... 23.4 10.7
Sulfide ............................................ 0.26 0.12
English units (pounds per
Total chromium .............................. 0.64 0.37
1,000 gallons of flow)
Hexavalent chromium .................... 0.052 0.024
pH .................................................. (2) (2)
BOD5 ......................................... 0.40 0.22
TSS ............................................ 0.28 0.18
Oil and grease ........................... 0.13 0.067 English units (pounds
pH .............................................. (1) (1) per 1,000 bbl of feed-
stock)
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
BOD5 ............................................. 14.7 7.8
[50 FR 28527, July 12, 1985] TSS ................................................ 9.9 6.3
COD 1 ............................................. 104.0 54.0
§ 419.55 Pretreatment standards for Oil and grease ............................... 4.5 2.4
existing sources (PSES). Phenolic compounds ..................... 0.105 0.051
Ammonia as N ............................... 8.3 3.8
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 Sulfide ............................................ 0.093 0.042
and 403.13 any existing source subject Total chromium .............................. 0.220 0.13
to this subpart which introduces pol- Hexavalent chromium .................... 0.019 0.0084
386
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00386 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 419.57
387
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00387 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 419, App. A 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
388
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00388 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 420
attainable by the application of the best Subpart E—Vacuum Degassing
available technology economically Subcategory
achievable (BAT).
420.24 New source performance standards 420.50 Applicability; description of the vacu-
(NSPS). um degassing subcategory.
420.25 Pretreatment standards for existing 420.51 [Reserved]
sources (PSES). 420.52 Effluent limitations representing the
420.26 Pretreatment standards for new degree of effluent reduction attainable
sources (PSNS). by the application of the best practicable
420.27 [Reserved] control technology currently available
420.28 Pretreatment standards compliance (BPT).
dates. 420.53 Effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable
420.29 Point of compliance monitoring.
by the application of the best available
technology economically achievable
Subpart C—Ironmaking Subcategory (BAT).
420.30 Applicability; description of the 420.54 New source performance standards
ironmaking subcategory. (NSPS).
420.55 Pretreatment standards for existing
420.31 Specialized definitions.
sources (PSES).
420.32 Effluent limitations representing the 420.56 Pretreatment standards for new
degree of effluent reduction attainable sources (PSNS).
by the application of the best practicable 420.57 [Reserved]
control technology currently available
(BPT). Subpart F—Continuous Casting
420.33 Effluent limitations representing the
Subcategory
degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available 420.60 Applicability; description of the con-
technology economically achievable tinuous casting subcategory.
(BAT). 420.61 [Reserved]
420.34 New source performance standards 420.62 Effluent limitations representing the
(NSPS). degree of effluent reduction attainable
420.35 Pretreatment standards for existing by the application of the best practicable
sources (PSES). control technology currently available
420.36 Pretreatment standards for new (BPT).
sources (PSNS). 420.63 Effluent limitations representing the
420.37 [Reserved] degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available
Subpart D—Steelmaking Subcategory technology economically achievable
(BAT).
420.40 Applicability; description of the 420.64 New source performance standards
steelmaking subcategory. (NSPS).
420.41 Specialized definitions. 420.65 Pretreatment standards for existing
420.42 Effluent limitations representing the sources (PSES).
degree of effluent reduction attainable 420.66 Pretreatment standards for new
by the application of the best practicable sources (PSNS).
control technology currently available 420.67 [Reserved]
(BPT).
420.43 Effluent limitations representing the Subpart G—Hot Forming Subcategory
degree of effluent reduction attainable 420.70 Applicability; description of the hot
by the application of the best available forming subcategory.
technology economically achievable 420.71 Specialized definitions.
(BAT). 420.72 Effluent limitations representing the
420.44 New source performance standards degree of effluent reduction attainable
(NSPS). by the application of the best practicable
420.45 Pretreatment standards for existing control technology currently available
sources (PSES). (BPT).
420.46 Pretreatment standards for new 420.73 Effluent limitations representing the
sources (PSNS). degree of effluent reduction attainable
420.47 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- by the application of the best available
resenting the degree of effluent reduction technology economically achievable
attainable by the application of the best (BAT).
conventional pollutant control tech- 420.74 New source performance standards
nology (BCT). (NSPS).
420.48 Pretreatment standards compliance 420.75 Pretreatment standards for existing
dates. sources (PSES).
389
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00389 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 420 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
420.76 Pretreatment standards for new able by the application of the best prac-
sources (PSNS). ticable control technology currently
420.77 Effluent limitations representing the available (BPT).
degree of effluent reduction attainable 420.103 Effluent limitations representing
by the application of the best conven- the degree of effluent reduction attain-
tional technology (BCT). able by the application of the best avail-
able technology economically achievable
Subpart H—Salt Bath Descaling (BAT).
Subcategory 420.104 New source performance standards
(NSPS).
420.80 Applicability; description of the salt 420.105 Pretreatment standards for existing
bath descaling subcategory. sources (PSES).
420.81 Specialized definitions. 420.106 Pretreatment standards for new
420.82 Effluent limitations representing the sources (PSNS).
degree of effluent reduction attainable 420.107 Effluent limitations representing
by the application of the best practicable the degree of effluent reduction attain-
control technology currently available able by the application of the best con-
(BPT). ventional technology (BCT).
420.83 Effluent limitations representing the
degree of effluent reduction attainable Subpart K—Alkaline Cleaning Subcategory
by the application of the best available
technology economically achievable 420.110 Applicability; description of the al-
(BAT). kaline cleaning subcategory.
420.84 New source performance standards 420.111 Specialized definitions.
(NSPS). 420.112 Effluent limitations representing
420.85 Pretreatment standards for existing the degree of effluent reduction attain-
sources (PSES). able by the application of the best prac-
420.86 Pretreatment standards for new ticable control technology currently
sources (PSNS). available (BPT).
420.87 Effluent limitations representing the 420.113 Effluent limitations representing
degree of effluent reduction attainable the degree of effluent reduction attain-
by the application of the best conven- able by the application of the best avail-
tional technology (BCT). able technology economically achievable
(BAT).
Subpart I—Acid Pickling Subcategory 420.114 New source performance standards
420.90 Applicability; description of the acid (NSPS).
pickling subcategory. 420.115 Pretreatment standards for existing
420.91 Specialized definitions. sources (PSES).
420.92 Effluent limitations representing the 420.116 Pretreatment standards for new
degree of effluent reduction attainable sources (PSNS).
by the application of the best practicable 420.117 Effluent limitations representing
control technology currently available the degree of effluent reduction attain-
(BPT). able by the application of the best con-
420.93 Effluent limitations representing the ventional technology (BCT).
degree of effluent reduction attainable
by the application of the best available Subpart L—Hot Coating Subcategory
technology economically achievable
420.120 Applicability; description of the hot
(BAT).
coating subcategory.
420.94 New source performance standards
420.121 Specialized definitions.
(NSPS).
420.95 Pretreatment standards for existing 420.122 Effluent limitations representing
sources (PSES). the degree of effluent reduction attain-
420.96 Pretreatment standards for new able by the application of the best prac-
sources (PSNS). ticable control technology currently
420.97 Effluent limitations representing the available (BPT).
degree of effluent reduction attainable 420.123 Effluent limitations representing
by the application of the best conven- the degree of effluent reduction attain-
tional technology (BCT). able by the application of the best avail-
able technology economically achievable
Subpart J—Cold Forming Subcategory (BAT).
420.124 New source performance standards
420.100 Applicability; description of the cold (NSPS).
forming subcategory. 420.125 Pretreatment standards for existing
420.101 Specialized definitions. sources (PSES).
420.102 Effluent limitations representing 420.126 Pretreatment standards for new
the degree of effluent reduction attain- sources (PSNS).
390
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00390 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.01
420.127 Effluent limitations representing NPDES permit Central treatment
Plant
the degree of effluent reduction attain- No. facility
able by the application of the best con-
1. Armco Steel, Ash- KY 0000485 ... Total Plant.
ventional technology (BCT).
land, KY.
2. Bethlehem Steel, MD 0001201 .. Humphrey’s Creek
Subpart M—Other Operations Subcategory Sparrows Point, Outfall 014.
MD.
420.130 Applicability. 3. Bethlehem Steel, IN 0000175 .... Total Plant.
420.131 Specialized definitions. Burns Harbor, IN.
420.132 Effluent limitations attainable by 4. Ford Motor Co., MI 0003361 ... Schaefer Road
the application of the best practicable Dearborn, MI. Treatment Plant.
control technology currently available 5. Interlake, Inc.,1 IL 0002119 .... Discharge to POTW.
Riverdale, IL.
(BPT).
6. J&L Steel, Ali- PA 0006131 ... Chemical Rinse
420.133 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- quippa, PA. Treatment Plant
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Outfall 018.
attainable by the application of the best 7. J&L Steel, Cleve- OH 0000850 .. Hot Forming and
available technology economically land, OH. Finishing Treat-
achievable (BAT). ment Plant.
420.134 New source performance standards 8. J&L Steel, Hen- IL 0002631 .... Total Plant.
(NSPS). nepin, IL.
9. J&L Steel, Louis- OH 0007188 .. Total Plant.
420.135 Pretreatment standards for existing
ville, OH.
sources (PSES). 10. J&L Steel, East IN 0000205 .... Terminal Treatment
420.136 Pretreatment standards for new Chicago, IN. Plant.
sources (PSNS). 11. Laclede Steel, IL 0000612 .... Total Plant.
420.137 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Alton, IL.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 12. National Steel, IL 0000329 .... Total Plant.
attainable by the application of the best Granite City, IL.
control technology for conventional pol- 13. National Steel, IN 0000337 .... Total Plant.
Portage, IN.
lutants (BCT).
14. National Steel, WV 0003336 .. Outfall B.
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301; 304 (b), (c), (e), and Weirton, WV.
(g); 306 (b) and (c); 307; 308 and 501 of the 15. Republic Steel, AL 0003522 ... Total Plant.
Clean Water Act (the Federal Water Pollu- Gadsden, AL.
16. Republic Steel,1 IL. 0002593 ... Discharge to POTW.
tion Control Act Amendments of 1972, as
Chicago, IL
amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977) (the 0002593.
‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311; 1314 (b), (c), (e), and 17. U.S. Steel, Lo- OH 0001562 .. Pipe Mill Lagoon.
(g); 1316 (b) and (c); 1317; 1318; and 1361; 86 rain, OH.
Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567; Pub. L. 18. U.S. Steel, UT 0000361 ... Total Plant.
95–217. Provo, UT.
19. U.S. Steel, PA 0013463 ... Terminal Treatment
SOURCE: 47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, unless Fairless Hills, PA. Plant.
otherwise noted. 20. U.S. Steel, Gary, IN 0000281 .... Terminal Lagoons.
IN.
GENERAL PROVISIONS 21. U.S. Steel,1 Chi- IL 0002691 .... Discharge to POTW.
cago, IL.
§ 420.01 Applicability. 1 The request for alternative effluent limitations for these
plants are for indirect discharges to POTWs
(a) The provisions of this part apply
to discharges and to the introduction (2) The information to be submitted
of pollutants into a publicly owned with the request for consideration of
treatment works resulting from pro- alternative effluent limitations is to
duction operations in the Iron and include:
Steel Point Source Category. (i) A schematic diagram of the exist-
(b) Central Treatment Facilities. (1) The ing wastewater treatment facility
following central treatment facilities showing each source of wastewater,
presently discharging through the cooling water, and other waters enter-
specified outfall are temporarily ex- ing the treatment facility; discharge
cluded from the provisions of this part, and recycle flow rates for each water
provided, the owner or operator of the source and each major treatment com-
facility requests the Agency to con- ponent;
sider establishing alternative effluent (ii) Existing monitoring data relating
limitations and provides the Agency to discharges to and from the central
with the information set out in para- treatment facility including pollutant
graph (b)(2) of this section, on or before concentrations, flows and mass load-
July 26, 1982. ings; As a minimum, monitoring data
391
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00391 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.02 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
should be provided for a six month pe- belief that the cost of bringing the
riod of normal operation of the produc- specified central treatment facilities
tion and treatment facilities. The com- into compliance with the provisions of
plete data as well as a data summary this part would require expenditures so
including the maximum, minimum, high compared to the Agency’s model
and mean gross discharge loadings and treatment system cost estimate appli-
the standard deviation of the discharge cable to that facility that the applica-
loadings for each monitored pollutant ble limitations or standards would not
should be provided. Any supplemental represent BPT, BAT, BCT, or PSES, as
monitoring data for toxic pollutants the case may be, for the facility.
should also be provided.
(iii) A scale map of the area of the [47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 47
FR 41739, Sept. 22, 1982]
plant served by the wastewater treat-
ment facility, including the treatment § 420.02 General definitions.
facility and water supply and discharge
points; In addition to the definitions set
(iv) An estimate of the least costly forth in 40 CFR part 401, the following
investment required to meet the gen- definitions apply to this part:
erally applicable limitations or stand- (a) The term TSS (or total suspended
ards for the facility and a description solids, or total suspended residue)
of such treatment system including means the value obtained by the meth-
schematic diagrams showing the major od specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
treatment system components and flow (b) The term oil and grease (or O&G)
rates through the system. As a min- means the value obtained by the meth-
imum, the cost estimates should be od specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
comprised of a single page summary for (c) The term ammonia-N (or ammo-
each water pollution control system nia-nitrogen) means the value obtained
showing estimated installed direct cost by manual distillation (at pH 9.5) fol-
totals for mechanical equipment; pip- lowed by the Nesslerization method
ing and instrumentation; foundations specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
and structural components; and, elec- (d) The term cyanide means total cy-
trical components. Indirect costs for anide and is determined by the method
contingencies, overhead and profit, en- specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
gineering fees, and any other indirect (e) The term phenols 4AAP (or phe-
costs must be itemized separately. The nolic compounds) means the value ob-
sum of the direct and indirect costs tained by the method specified in 40
which represents the owner’s or opera- CFR 136.3.
tor’s total estimate, must be shown.
(f) The term TRC (or total residual
(v) The effluent limitations or stand-
chlorine) means the value obtained by
ards which could be achieved if the dis-
the iodometric titration with an am-
charger were to spend an amount equal
perometric endpoint method specified
to the Agency’s model treatment sys-
in 40 CFR 136.3.
tem cost estimate for the facility and
the treatment facilities which would be (g) The term chromium means total
used to meet those limitations or chromium and is determined by the
standards. Schematic diagrams and method specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
cost estimates as outlined in paragraph (h) The term hexavalent chromium (or
(b)(2)(iv) of this section, should be pro- chromium VI) means the value ob-
vided for each treatment system; and, tained by the method specified in 40
(vi) Production rates in tons per day CFR 136.3.
for each process contributing waste- (i) The term copper means total cop-
water to the central treatment facility per and is determined by the method
consistent with those reported by the specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
owner or operator in the NPDES per- (j) The term lead means total lead
mit application for the central treat- and is determined by the method speci-
ment facility. fied in 40 CFR 136.3.
(3) The request described in sub- (k) The term nickel means total nick-
section (b)(1) of this section, must be el and is determined by the method
based upon the owner’s or operator’s specified in 40 CFR 136.3.
392
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00392 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.03
(l) The term zinc means total zinc duce the amount of ammonia and in-
and is determined by the method speci- crease the amount of nitrite and ni-
fied in 40 CFR 136.3. trate.
(m) The term benzene (or priority pol- (t) The term storm water from the im-
lutant No. 4) means the value obtained mediate process area means storm water
by the standard method Number 602 that comes into contact with process
specified in 44 FR 69464, 69570 (Decem- equipment located outdoors, storm
ber 3, 1979). water collected in process area and
(n) The term benzo(a)pyrene (or pri- bulk storage tank secondary contain-
ority pollutant No. 73) means the value ment structures, and storm water from
obtained by the standard method Num- wastewater treatment systems located
ber 610 specified in 44 FR 69464, 69570 outdoors, provided that it has the po-
(December 3, 1979). tential to become contaminated with
(o) The term naphthalene (or priority process wastewater pollutants for the
pollutant No. 55) means the value ob-
particular subcategory. Storm water
tained by the standard method Number
from building roofs, plant roadways,
610 specified in 44 FR 69464, 69571 (De-
and other storm waters that do not
cember 3, 1979).
have the potential to become contami-
(p) The term tetrachloroethylene (or
nated with process wastewater pollut-
priority pollutant No. 85) means the
value obtained by the standard method ants are not storm water from the im-
Number 610 specified in 44 FR 69464, mediate process area.
69571 (December 3, 1979). (u) The term 2,3,7,8–TCDF means
(q) The term pH means the value ob- 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran.
tained by the standard method speci- [47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 67
fied in 40 CFR 136.3. FR 64260, Oct. 17, 2002]
(r) The term non-process wastewaters
means utility wastewaters (for exam- § 420.03 Alternative effluent limita-
ple, water treatment residuals, boiler tions representing the degree of ef-
blowdown, and air pollution control fluent reduction attainable by the
wastewaters from heat recovery equip- application of best practicable con-
ment); treated or untreated trol technology currently available,
wastewaters from groundwater remedi- best available technology economi-
cally achievable, best available
ation systems; dewatering water for demonstrated control technology,
building foundations; and other waste- and best conventional pollutant
water streams not associated with a control technology (the ‘‘water bub-
production process. ble’’).
(s) The term nitrification means oxi-
(a) Except as provided in paragraphs
dation of ammonium salts to nitrites
(via Nitrosomas bacteria) and the fur- (c) through (f) of this section, any ex-
ther oxidation of nitrite to nitrate via isting or new direct discharging point
Nitrobacter bacteria. Nitrification can source subject to this part may qualify
be accomplished in either: for alternative effluent limitations to
(1) A single or two-stage activated those specified in subparts A through
sludge wastewater treatment system; M of this part, representing the degree
or of effluent reduction attainable by the
(2) Wetlands specifically developed application of best practicable control
with a marsh/pond configuration and technology currently available (BPT),
maintained for the express purpose of best available technology economically
removing ammonia-N. achievable (BAT), best conventional
Indicators of nitrification capability pollutant control technology (BCT),
are: and best available demonstrated con-
(1) Biological monitoring for ammo- trol technology (NSPS). The alter-
nia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and ni- native effluent limitations for each
trite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) to deter- pollutant are determined for a com-
mine if the nitrification is occurring; bination of outfalls by totaling the
and mass limitations allowed under sub-
(2) Analysis of the nitrogen balance parts A through M of this part for each
to determine if nitrifying bacteria re- pollutant.
393
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00393 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.04 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) The water bubble may be used to owner or operator must submit to the
calculate alternative effluent limita- Control Authority a modified average
tions only for identical pollutants (e.g., rate of production.
lead for lead, not lead for zinc). [49 FR 21029, May 17, 1984; 49 FR 24726, June
(c) Use of the water bubble to develop 15, 1984; 49 FR 25634, June 22, 1984]
alternate effluent limitations for oil &
grease is prohibited. § 420.05 Pretreatment standards com-
(d) A discharger cannot qualify for pliance date.
alternative effluent limitations if the The final compliance date for the
application of such alternative effluent categorical pretreatment standards set
limitations would cause or contribute forth in 40 CFR part 420 is July 10, 1985.
to an exceedance of any applicable
water quality standards. [48 FR 46943, Oct. 14, 1983]
(e) Each outfall from which process
wastewaters are discharged must have § 420.06 Removal credits for phenols
(4AAP).
specific, fixed effluent limitations for
each pollutant limited by the applica- Removal allowances pursuant to 40
ble subparts A through M of this part. CFR 403.7(a)(1) may be granted for phe-
(f) Subcategory-specific restrictions: nols (4AAP) limited in 40 CFR part 420
(1) There shall be no alternate efflu- when used as an indicator or surrogate
ent limitations for cokemaking process pollutant.
wastewater unless the alternative limi- [49 FR 21029, May 17, 1984]
tations are more stringent than the
limitations in Subpart A of this part; § 420.07 Effluent limitations guidelines
and and standards for pH.
(2) There shall be no alternate efflu- (a) The pH level in process
ent limitations for 2,3,7,8–TCDF in sin- wastewaters subject to a subpart with-
tering process wastewater. in this part shall be within the range of
[67 FR 64261, Oct. 17, 2002] 6.0 to 9.0.
(b) The pH level shall be monitored
§ 420.04 Calculation of pretreatment at the point of discharge to the receiv-
standards. ing water or at the point at which the
(a) Pretreatment standards shall be wastewater leaves the wastewater
calculated for each operation using the treatment facility operated to treat ef-
applicable average rate of production fluent subject to that subpart.
reported by the owner or operator of [67 FR 64261, Oct. 17, 2002]
the facility to the Control Authority in
accordance with 40 CFR 403.12(b)(3). § 420.08 Non-process wastewater and
(b) The average rate of production re- storm water.
ported by the owner or operator in ac- Permit and pretreatment control au-
cordance with 40 CFR 403.12(b)(3) shall thorities may provide for increased
be based not upon the design produc- loadings for non-process wastewaters
tion capacity but rather upon a reason- defined at § 420.02 and for storm water
able measure of actual production of from the immediate process area in
the facility, such as the production NPDES permits and pretreatment con-
during the high month of the previous trol mechanisms using best profes-
year, or the monthly average for the sional judgment, but only to the extent
highest of the previous 5 years. For such non-process wastewaters result in
new sources or new dischargers, actual an increased flow.
production shall be estimated using
[67 FR 64261, Oct. 17, 2002]
projected production.
(c) If, due to a change of cir-
cumstances, the average rate of pro- Subpart A—Cokemaking
duction for an operation reported by Subcategory
the owner or operator of the facility to
the Control Authority in accordance § 420.10 Applicability.
with 40 CFR 403.12(b)(3) does not rep- The provisions of this subpart are ap-
resent a reasonable measure of actual plicable to discharges and the introduc-
production of that operation, the tion of pollutants into publicly owned
394
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00394 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.12
treatment works resulting from by- (k) The term merchant means those
product and other cokemaking oper- by-product cokemaking operations
ations. that provide more than fifty percent of
the coke produced to operations, indus-
[67 FR 64261, Oct. 17, 2002]
tries, or processes other than
§ 420.11 Specialized definitions. ironmaking blast furnaces associated
with steel production.
(a) For the cokemaking subcategory, (l) The term O&G (as HEM) means
the term product means the production total recoverable oil and grease meas-
of coke plus coke breeze. ured as n-hexane extractable material.
(b) The term by-product cokemaking (m) The term wet desulfurization sys-
means operations in which coal is heat- tem means those systems that remove
ed in the absence of air to produce met- sulfur compounds from coke oven gases
allurgical coke (furnace coke and and produce a contaminated process
foundry coke), and the recovery of by- wastewater.
products derived from the gases and
liquids that are driven from the coal [67 FR 64261, Oct. 17, 2002]
during cokemaking.
§ 420.12 Effluent limitations rep-
(c) The term cokemaking—non-recov- resenting the degree of effluent re-
ery means cokemaking operations for duction attainable by the applica-
production of metallurgical coke (fur- tion of the best practicable control
nace coke and foundry coke) without technology currently available
recovery of by-products. Does not in- (BPT).
clude co-generation facilities located Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
at non-recovery coke facilities. through 125.32, any existing point
(d) The term coke means a processed source subject to this subpart must
form of coal that serves as the basic achieve the following effluent limita-
fuel for the smelting of iron ore. tions representing the degree of efflu-
(1) The term foundry coke means coke ent reduction attainable by the appli-
produced for foundry operations. cation of the best practicable control
(2) The term furnace coke means coke technology currently available.
produced for blast furnace operations (a) By-product cokemaking—iron and
(e) The term merchant coke plant steel.
means by-product cokemaking oper-
ations that provide more than fifty SUBPART A
percent of the coke produced to oper- BPT effluent limitations
ations, industries, or processes other
than ironmaking blast furnaces associ- Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
ated with steel production. for any 1 ues for 30
(f) The term iron and steel coke plant day consecu-
tive days
means by-product cokemaking oper-
ations other than those at merchant Kg/kkg (pounds per
coke plants. 1,000 lb) of product
395
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00395 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.13 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
allowed for by-product coke plants source subject to this subpart must
which include indirect ammonia recov- achieve the following effluent limita-
ery systems but only to the extent that tions representing the degree of efflu-
such systems generate an increased ef- ent reduction attainable by the appli-
fluent volume. cation of the best available technology
(b) By-product cokemaking—merchant. economically achievable (BAT):
(a) By-product cokemaking.
SUBPART A
SUBPART A—EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (BAT)
BPT effluent limitations
396
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00396 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.16
397
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00397 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.17 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
398
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00398 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.22
399
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00399 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.23 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
achieve the following effluent limita- (a) Sintering operations with wet air
tions representing the degree of efflu- pollution control system. The following
ent reduction attainable by the appli- table presents BPT limitations for sin-
cation of the best practicable control tering operations with wet air pollu-
technology currently available (BPT). tion control systems:
SUBPART B—EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (BPT)
BPT effluent limitations
Pollutants or pollutant property Average of daily values
Maximum for any 1 day for 30 consecutive days
(b) Sintering operations with dry air source subject to this subpart must
pollution control system. There shall be achieve the following effluent limita-
no discharge of process wastewater pol- tions representing the degree of efflu-
lutants to waters of the U.S. ent reduction attainable by the appli-
[67 FR 64264, Oct. 17, 2002] cation of the best available control
technology economically achievable
§ 420.23 Effluent limitations guidelines (BAT).
representing the degree of effluent (a) Sintering operations with wet air
reduction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available tech- pollution control system. The following
nology economically achievable table presents BAT limitations for sin-
(BAT). tering operations with wet air pollu-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 tion control systems:
through 125.32, any existing point
SUBPART B—EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS (BAT)
Regulated parameter Maximum daily1 Maximum monthly avg.1
(b) Sintering operations with dry air (a) Any new source subject to the
pollution control system. There shall be provisions of this section that com-
no discharge of process wastewater pol- menced discharging after November 19,
lutants to waters of the U.S. 2012 and before November 18, 2002 must
continue to achieve the applicable
[67 FR 64264, Oct. 17, 2002]
standards specified in § 420.24 of title 40
§ 402.24 New source performance of the Code of Federal Regulations, re-
standards (NSPS). vised as of July 1, 2001, except that
after the expiration of the applicable
New sources subject to this subpart
time period specified in 40 CFR
must achieve the following new source
122.29(d)(1), the source must also
performance standards (NSPS), as ap-
achieve the effluent limitations speci-
plicable.
fied in § 420.23 for 2,3,7,8-TCDF.
400
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00400 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.26
(b) The following standards apply (1) Sintering operations with wet air
with respect to each new source that pollution control system. The following
commences construction after Novem- table presents NSPS for sintering oper-
ber 18, 2002. ations with wet air pollution control
systems:
SUBPART B—NEW SOURCE PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (NSPS)
Regulated parameter Maximum daily1 Maximum monthly avg.1
(2) Sintering operations with dry air to this subpart that introduces pollut-
pollution control system. There shall be ants into a publicly owned treatment
no discharge of process wastewater pol- works must comply with 40 CFR part
lutants to waters of the U.S. 403 and must achieve the following
pretreatment standards for existing
[67 FR 64265, Oct. 17, 2002] sources (PSES):
(a) Sintering operations with wet air
§ 420.25 Pretreatment standards for
pollution control system. The fol-
existing sources (PSES).
lowing table presents PSES for sinter-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 ing operations with wet air pollution
and 403.13, any existing source subject control systems:
SUBPART B—PRETREATMENT STANDARDS FOR EXISTING SOURCES (PSES)
Regulated parameter Maximum daily1 Maximum monthly avg.1
(b) Sintering operations with dry air licly owned treatment works must
pollution control system. There shall be comply with 40 CFR part 403 and must
no discharge of process wastewater pol- achieve the following pretreatment
lutants to POTWs. standards for new sources (PSNS), as
applicable.
[67 FR 64265, Oct. 17, 2002]
(a) Sintering operations with wet air
§ 420.26 Pretreatment standards for pollution control system.
new sources (PSNS). (1) Any new source subject to the
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, provisions of this section that com-
any new source subject to this subpart menced discharging after November 19,
that introduces pollutants into a pub- 2012 and before November 18, 2002 must
401
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00401 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.27 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) Sintering operations with dry air water, if such water(s) are in an
pollution control system. There shall be amount greater than 5 percent by vol-
no discharge of process wastewater pol- ume of the sintering process
lutants to POTWs. wastewaters.
[67 FR 64266, Oct. 17, 2002] (b) Sintering Indirect Dischargers. An
indirect discharger must demonstrate
§ 420.27 [Reserved] compliance with the pretreatment
standards for 2,3,7,8-TCDF by moni-
§ 420.28 Pretreatment standards com-
pliance dates. toring at the point after treatment of
sinter plant wastewater separately or
Compliance with the pretreatment in combination with blast furnace
standards for 2,3,7,8–TCDF for existing
wastewater, but prior to mixing with
sources set forth in § 420.25(a) is re-
process wastewaters from processes
quired not later than October 17, 2005
other than sintering and ironmaking,
whether or not the pretreatment au-
thority issues or amends a non-process wastewaters and non-con-
pretreatment permit requiring such tact cooling water in an amount great-
compliance. er than 5 percent by volume of the sin-
tering process wastewaters.
[67 FR 64266, Oct. 17, 2002]
[67 FR 64266, Oct. 17, 2002]
§ 420.29 Point of compliance moni-
toring.
Subpart C—Ironmaking
(a) Sintering Direct Dischargers. Pursu- Subcategory
ant to 40 CFR 122.44(i) and 122.45(h), a
direct discharger must demonstrate § 420.30 Applicability; description of
compliance with the effluent limita- the ironmaking subcategory.
tions and standards for 2,3,7,8–TCDF at
the point after treatment of sinter The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plant wastewater separately or in com- plicable to discharges and to the intro-
bination with blast furnace waste- duction of pollutants into publicly
water, but prior to mixing with process owned treatment works resulting from
wastewaters from processes other than ironmaking operations in which iron
sintering and ironmaking, non-process ore is reduced to molten iron in a blast
wastewaters or non-contact cooling furnace.
402
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00402 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.34
403
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00403 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.35 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART C SUBPART C
Pretreatment standards for Pretreatment standards for
existing sources new sources
Pollutant or pollutant property Average of Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
Maximum for daily values Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days secutive days
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb) Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb)
of products of product
404
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00404 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.42
405
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00405 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.43 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
406
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00406 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.46
Average of
Lead ............................................... 0.000413 0.000138 Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
Zinc ................................................ 0.000620 0.000207 for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
tive days
(d) Basic oxygen furnace steelmaking—
semi-wet. (1) No discharge of process Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product
wastewater pollutants to navigable wa-
ters. Lead ............................................... 0.000413 0.000138
(2) If the permittee demonstrates to Zinc ................................................ 0.000620 0.000207
the satisfaction of the pretreatment
control authority that safety consider- [47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 47
ations prevent attainment of these lim- FR 41739, Sept. 22, 1982; 67 FR 64268, Oct. 17,
itations, the pretreatment control au- 2002]
thority may establish alternative limi-
407
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00407 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.47 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
408
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00408 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.62
409
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00409 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.63 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
410
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00410 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.72
(b) The term primary mill means those majority, on a tonnage basis, of carbon
steel hot forming operations that re- steel products.
duce ingots to blooms or slabs by pass- (l) The term specialty hot forming op-
ing the ingots between rotating steel eration (or ‘‘specialty’’) applies to all
rolls. The first hot forming operation hot forming operations other than
performed on solidified steel after it is ‘‘carbon hot forming operations.’’
removed from the ingot molds is car-
ried out on a ‘‘primary mill’’. § 420.72 Effluent limitations rep-
(c) The term section mill means those resenting the degree of effluent re-
steel hot forming operations that duction attainable by the applica-
produce a variety of finished and semi- tion of the best practicable control
finished steel products other than the technology currently available
products of those mills specified below (BPT).
in paragraphs (d), (e), (g), and (h) of Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
this section. through 125.32, any existing point
(d) The term flat mill means those source subject to this subpart must
steel hot forming operations that re- achieve the following effluent limita-
duce heated slabs to plates, strip and tions representing the degree of efflu-
sheet, or skelp. ent reduction attainable by the appli-
(e) The term pipe and tube mill means cation of the best practicable control
those steel hot forming operations that technology currently available.
produce butt welded or seamless tubu- (a) Primary mills, carbon and
lar steel products. specialty—(1) Without scarfing.
(f) The term scarfing means those
steel surface conditioning operations in SUBPART G
which flames generated by the combus-
tion of oxygen and fuel are used to re- BPT effluent limitations
move surface metal imperfections from Average of
slabs, billets, or blooms. Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
(g) The term plate mill means those day consecu-
steel hot forming operations that tive days
produce flat hot-rolled products which Kg/kkg (pounds per
are (1) between 8 and 48 inches wide and 1,000 lb) of product
over 0.23 inches thick; or (2) greater
than 48 inches wide and over 0.18 inches TSS ................................................ 0.150 0.0561
thick. O&G ............................................... 0.0374 ..................
(h) The term hot strip and sheet mill pH .................................................. (1) (1)
means those steel hot forming oper- 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
ations that produce flat hot-rolled
products other than plates. (2) With scarfing.
(i) The term specialty steel means SUBPART G
those steel products containing
alloying elements which are added to BPT effluent limitations
enhance the properties of the steel Average of
product when individual alloying ele- Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
ments (e.g., aluminum, chromium, co- for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
balt, columbium, molybdenum, nickel, tive days
titanium, tungsten, vanadium, zir-
Kg/kkg (pounds per
conium) exceed 3% or the total of all 1,000 lb) of product
alloying elements exceed 5%.
(j) The term carbon steel means those TSS ................................................ 0.221 0.0830
steel products other than specialty O&G ............................................... 0.0553 ..................
steel products. pH .................................................. (1) 1
( )
(k) The term carbon hot forming oper- 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
ation (or ‘‘carbon’’) means those hot
forming operations which produce a (b) Section mills—(1) Carbon.
411
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00411 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.73 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
SUBPART G Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
BPT effluent limitations day consecu-
tive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Kg/kkg (pounds per
for any 1 ues for 30 1,000 lb) of product
day consecu-
tive days
TSS ................................................ 0.100 0.0376
Kg/kkg (pounds per O&G ............................................... 0.0250 (1)
1,000 lb) of product pH .................................................. (1) (1)
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0
TSS ................................................ 0.224 0.0841
O&G ............................................... 0.0561 ..................
pH .................................................. (1) (1) (d) Pipe and tube mills, carbon and spe-
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
cialty.
412
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00412 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.74
413
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00413 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.75 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
TSS ................................................ 0.0100 0.00375 Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
O&G ............................................... 0.00250 .................. for any 1 ues for 30
pH .................................................. (1) (1) day consecu-
tive days
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0
Kg/kkg (pounds per
(d) Pipe and tube mills, carbon and spe- 1,000 lb) of product
cialty.
TSS ................................................ 0.150 0.0561
SUBPART G O&G ............................................... 0.0374 ..................
pH .................................................. (1) 1
( )
New source perform- 1 Within
ance standards the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
414
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00414 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.80
Average of
SUBPART G Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
BCT effluent limitations day consecu-
tive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
for any 1 ues for 30 lb) of product
day consecu-
tive days
TSS .............................................. 0.100 0.0376
Kg/kkg (pounds per O&G ............................................. 0.0250 ..................
1,000 lb) of product pH ................................................ (1) (1)
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
TSS ................................................ 0.224 0.0841
O&G ............................................... 0.0561 ..................
pH .................................................. (1) (1) (d) Pipe and tube mills, carbon and spe-
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
cialty.
415
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00415 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.81 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
416
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00416 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.83
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Chromium ...................................... 0.00175 0.000701
for any 1 ues for 30 Nickel ............................................. 0.00158 0.000526
day consecu-
tive days
(3) Batch, pipe and tube.
Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product SUBPART H
TSS ................................................ 0.532 0.228 BAT effluent limitations
Cyanide ......................................... 0.00569 0.00190
Average of
Chromium ...................................... 0.00759 0.00304 Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
Nickel ............................................. 0.00683 0.00228 for any 1 ues for 30
pH .................................................. (1) (1) day consecu-
tive days
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
Kg/kkg (pounds per
[47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982; 47 FR 41739, Sept. 1,000 lb) of product
22, 1982]
Chromium ...................................... 0.00709 0.00284
§ 420.83 Effluent limitations rep- Nickel ............................................. 0.00638 0.00213
resenting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica- (4) Continuous.
tion of the best available tech-
nology economically achievable SUBPART H
(BAT).
BAT effluent limitations
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
Average of
through 125.32, any existing point Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
source subject to this subpart must for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
achieve the following effluent limita- tive days
tions representing the degree of efflu-
Kg/kkg (pounds per
ent reduction attainable by the appli- 1,000 lb) of product
cation of the best available technology
economically achievable. Chromium ...................................... 0.00138 0.000551
(a) Salt bath descaling, oxidizing—(1) Nickel ............................................. 0.00124 0.000413
Batch, sheet and plate.
(b) Salt bath descaling, reducing—(1)
Batch.
417
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00417 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.84 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART H SUBPART H
BAT effluent limitations New source perform-
ance standards
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Average of
for any 1 ues for 30 Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
day consecu- for any 1 ues for 30
tive days day consecu-
tive days
Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product
Cyanide ......................................... 0.00102 0.000339
Chromium ...................................... 0.00136 0.000542 TSS ................................................ 0.123 0.0526
Nickel ............................................. 0.00122 0.000407 Chromium ...................................... 0.00175 0.000701
Nickel ............................................. 0.00158 0.000526
(2) Continuous. pH .................................................. (1) (1)
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
SUBPART H
(3) Batch, pipe and tube.
BAT effluent limitations
Average of SUBPART H
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 New source perform-
day consecu- ance standards
tive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
Kg/kkg (pounds per Maximum daily val-
1,000 lb) of product for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
tive days
Cyanide ......................................... 0.00569 0.00190
Chromium ...................................... 0.00759 0.00304 Kg/kkg (pounds per
Nickel ............................................. 0.00683 0.00228 1,000 lb) of product
418
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00418 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.85
419
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00419 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.86 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART H SUBPART H
Pretreatment standards Pretreatment standards
for existing sources for new sources
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum daily val- Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu- day consecu-
tive days tive days
420
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00420 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.87
Average Average
Pollutant or pollutant property of daily Pollutant or pollutant property of daily
Maximum Maximum
values for values for
for any 1 for any 1
30 con- 30 con-
day day
secutive secutive
days days
Average
Kg/kkg (pounds per Pollutant or pollutant property of daily
1,000 lb) of product Maximum values for
for any 1 30 con-
day secutive
Cyanide ............................................. 0.00569 0.00190 days
Chromium .......................................... 0.00759 0.00304
Nickel ................................................. 0.00683 0.00228 Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product
(4) Continuous.
421
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00421 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.90 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
422
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00422 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.92
(m) The term strip, sheet and plate Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb)
means those acid pickling operations of product
that pickle strip, sheet or plate prod-
ucts. TSS ........................................ 0.0263 0.0113
O&G 1 ..................................... 0.0113 0.00375
(n) The term pipe, tube and other Lead ....................................... 0.000169 0.0000563
means those acid pickling operations Zinc ........................................ 0.000225 0.0000751
that pickle pipes, tubes or any steel pH .......................................... (2) (2)
product other than those included in 1 The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
paragraphs (k), (l) and (m) of this sec- acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
wastewaters.
tion. 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
and coil. 1 The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
wastewaters.
SUBPART I 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
423
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00423 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.92 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
SUBPART I
BPT effluent limitations (3) Pipe, tube and other products.
Average of SUBPART I
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu- BPT effluent limitations
tive days
Average of
Kilograms per day Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
TSS ................................................ 5.72 2.45 tive days
O&G 1 ............................................. 2.45 0.819
Lead ............................................... 0.0368 0.0123 Kg/kkg (pounds per
Zinc ................................................ 0.0491 0.0164 1,000 lb) of product
pH .................................................. (2) (2)
1 The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when TSS ................................................ 0.298 0.128
acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling O&G 1 ............................................. 0.128 0.0426
wastewaters. Lead ............................................... 0.00192 0.000638
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
Zinc ................................................ 0.00255 0.000851
pH .................................................. (2) 2
( )
The above limitations shall be applica- 1 The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
ble to each fume scrubber associated acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
with a sulfuric acid pickling operation. wastewaters.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
(b) Hydrochloric acid pickling (spent
acid solutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod, (4) Fume scrubbers.
wire and coil.
SUBPART I
SUBPART I
BPT effluent limitations
BPT effluent limitations
Average of
Average of Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- for any 1 ues for 30
for any 1 ues for 30 day consecu-
day consecu- tive days
tive days
Kilograms per day
Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product TSS ................................................ 5.72 2.45
O&G 1 ............................................. 2.45 0.819
TSS ................................................ 0.143 0.0613 Lead ............................................... 0.0368 0.0123
O&G 1 ............................................. 0.0613 0.0204 Zinc ................................................ 0.0491 0.0164
Lead ............................................... 0.000920 0.000307 pH .................................................. (2) (2)
Zinc ................................................ 0.00123 0.000409
1 The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
pH .................................................. (2) (2)
acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
1 Thelimitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when wastewaters.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
wastewaters.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
The above limitations shall be applica-
(2) Strip, sheet and plate. ble to each fume scrubber associated
with a hydrochloric acid pickling oper-
SUBPART I ation.
BPT effluent limitations
(5) Acid regeneration (absorber vent
scrubber).
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 SUBPART I
day consecu-
tive days BPT effluent limitations
424
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00424 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.92
SUBPART I SUBPART I
BPT effluent limitations BPT effluent limitations
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu- day consecu-
tive days tive days
(2) Bar, billet, and bloom. (5) Pipe, tube, and other products.
SUBPART I SUBPART I
BPT effluent limitations BPT effluent limitations
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu- day consecu-
tive days tive days
425
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00425 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.93 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART I SUBPART I
BPT effluent limitations BAT effluent limitations
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- daily values
for any 1
for any 1 ues for 30 for 30 con-
day
day consecu- secutive days
tive days
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
Kilograms per day lb) of product
[47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982; 47 FR 41739, Sept. Lead ........................................... 0.000338 0.000113
22, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 21030, May 17, Zinc ............................................ 0.000451 0.000150
1984]
(4) Pipe, tube and other products.
§ 420.93 Effluent limitations rep-
resenting the degree of effluent re- SUBPART I
duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best available tech- BAT effluent limitations
nology economically achievable Average of
(BAT). Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 day consecu-
tive days
through 125.32, any existing point
source subject to this subpart must Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- Lead ............................................... 0.000939 0.000313
ent reduction attainable by the appli- Zinc ................................................ 0.00125 0.000417
cation of the best available technology
economically achievable. (5) Fume scrubbers.
(a) Sulfuric acid pickling (spent acid so-
SUBPART I
lutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod, wire
and coil. BAT effluent limitations
Average of
SUBPART I Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
BAT effluent limitations day consecu-
tive days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Kilograms per day
for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
tive days Lead ............................................... 0.0368 0.0123
Zinc ................................................ 0.0491 0.0164
Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product The above limitations shall be applica-
ble to each fume scrubber associated
Lead ............................................... 0.000526 0.000175
with a sulfuric acid pickling operation.
Zinc ................................................ 0.000701 0.000234
(b) Hydrochloric acid pickling (spent
acid solutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod,
(2) Bar, billet and bloom.
wire and coil.
426
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00426 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.93
427
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00427 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.94 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(5) Pipe, tube, and other products. TSS ........................................ 0.0146 0.00626
O&G* ..................................... 0.00626 0.00209
SUBPART I Lead ....................................... 0.0000939 0.0000313
Zinc ........................................ 0.000125 0.0000417
BAT effluent limitations pH .......................................... (1) (1)
Average of *The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
for any 1 ues for 30 wastewaters.
day consecu- 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
tive days
(2) Bar, billet, and bloom.
Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of product
SUBPART I
Chromium ...................................... 0.00322 0.00129 New source performance
Nickel ............................................. 0.00289 0.000964 standards
Chromium ...................................... 0.0819 0.0327 *The limitations for oil and grease shall be applicable when
acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
Nickel ............................................. 0.0735 0.0245 wastewaters.
1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
428
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00428 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.94
ble to each fume scrubber associated acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
wastewaters.
with a sulfuric acid pickling operation. 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
429
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00429 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.94 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb) acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
wastewaters.
of product 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
TSS ........................................ 0.0117 0.00501 (5) Pipe, tube, and other products.
430
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00430 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.95
SUBPART I SUBPART I
New source performance Pretreatment standards
standards for existing sources
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum daily values Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive day secutive
days days
Average of
(6) Fume scrubbers. Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive
SUBPART I days
431
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00431 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.95 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum daily val- Maximum daily values
for any 1 ues for 30 for any 1 for 30 con-
day consecu- day secutive
tive days days
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property
SUBPART I Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con-
Pretreatment standards day secutive
for existing sources days
432
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00432 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.96
SUBPART I SUBPART I
Pretreatment standards Pretreatment standards
for existing sources for existing sources
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Pollutant or pollutant property
Maximum daily values Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive day secutive
days days
433
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00433 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.96 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb) (2) Strip, sheet, and plate.
of product
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 (3) Pipe, tube, and other products.
lb) of product
SUBPART I
Lead ......................................... 0.000131 0.0000438
Zinc .......................................... 0.000175 0.0000584 Pretreatment standards for
new sources
(5) Fume scrubber. Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
Maximum daily values
for any 1
SUBPART I day for 30 con-
secutive days
Pretreatment standards
for new sources Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
lb) of product
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 Lead ......................................... 0.000206 0.0000688
day consecu- Zinc .......................................... 0.000275 0.0000918
tive days
Average of
(b) Hydrochloric acid pickling (spent Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
acid solutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod, for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
wire, coil. tive days
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb) (c) Combination acid pickling (spent
of product acid solutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod,
wire, and coil.
Lead ....................................... 0.000113 0.0000376
434
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00434 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.97
Chromium .................................. 0.000710 0.000284 Note: The above limitations shall be applicable for each
Nickel ......................................... 0.000638 0.000213 fume scrubber associated with combination acid pickling
operations.
435
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00435 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.97 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- (4) Pipe, tube and other products.
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best conventional tech- SUBPART I
nology.
BCT effluent limitations
(a) Sulfuric acid pickling (spent acid so-
lutions and rinse waters)—(1) Rod, wire Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
and coil. for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive
SUBPART I days
Kg/kkg (pounds per acid pickling wastewaters are treated with cold rolling
1,000 lb) of product wastewaters.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
436
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00436 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.97
Average of
BCT effluent limitations Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
Average of day consecu-
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- tive days
for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
tive days Kilograms per day
437
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00437 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.100 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART I SUBPART I
BCT effluent limitations BCT effluent limitations
Average of Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu- day consecu-
tive days tive days
438
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00438 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.102
439
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00439 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.103 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of SUBPART J
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- BPT effluent limitations
day secutive
days Average of
Pollutant of pollutant property Maximum for daily values
Naphthalene .............................. 0.000125 .................... any 1 day for 30 con-
Tetrachloroethylene ................... 0.000188 .................... secutive days
pH .............................................. (2) (2)
1 The limitations for chromium and nickel shall be applicable
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb)
of product
in lieu of those for lead and zinc when cold rolling
wastewaters are cotreated with descaling or combination acid
pickling wastewaters. TSS ........................................ 0.00125 0.000626
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
O&G ....................................... 0.000522 0.000209
(4) Direct application—single stand. Chromium 1 ............................ 0.0000209 0.0000084
Lead ....................................... 0.0000094 0.0000031
SUBPART J Nickel 1 ................................... 0.0000188 0.0000063
Zinc ........................................ 0.0000063 0.0000021
BPT effluent limitations pH .......................................... (2) (2)
1 The limitations for chromium and nickel shall be applicable
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property in lieu of those for lead and zinc when cold forming
Maximum for daily values
any 1 day for 30 con- wastewaters are treated with descaling or combination acid
secutive days pickling wastewaters.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
440
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00440 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.103
SUBPART J
Chromium 1 .............................. 0.000104 0.0000418
Lead ......................................... 0.0000469 0.0000156
Nickel1 ..................................... 0.0000939 0.0000313 BAT effluent limitations
Zinc .......................................... 0.0000313 0.0000104 Average of
Naphthalene ............................ 0.0000104 .................... Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
Tetrachloroethylene ................. 0.0000156 .................... for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive
1 The limitations for chromium and nickel shall be applicable
days
in lieu of those for lead and zinc when cold rolling
wastewaters are treated with descaling or combination acid
pickling wastewaters. Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
lb) of product
(3) Combination.
Chromium 1 ................................ 0.00167 0.000668
SUBPART J Lead ........................................... 0.000751 0.000250
Nickel 1 ....................................... 0.00150 0.000501
BAT effluent limitations Zinc ............................................ 0.000501 0.000167
Average of Naphthalene .............................. 0.000167 ....................
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values Tetrachloroethylene ................... 0.000250 ....................
for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive 1 The limitations for chromium and nickel shall be applicable
days in lieu of those for lead and zinc when cold rolling
wastewaters are treated with descaling or combination acid
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 pickling wastewaters.
lb) of product
(b) Cold worked pipe and tube—(1)
Chromium 1 ................................ 0.00125 0.000501 Using water.
Lead ........................................... 0.000563 0.000188
441
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00441 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.104 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
442
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00442 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.105
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 [47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 49
lb) of product FR 21035, May 17, 1984; 49 FR 24726, June 15,
1984]
TSS ............................................ 0.0726 0.0363
O&G ........................................... 0.0302 0.0121 § 420.105 Pretreatment standards for
Chromium1 ................................. 0.00121 0.000484 existing sources (PSES).
Lead ........................................... 0.000545 0.000182
Nickel1 ....................................... 0.00109 0.000363 Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
Zinc ............................................ 0.000363 0.000121 and 403.13, any existing source subject
Naphthalene .............................. 0.000121 ....................
Tetrachloro-ethylene .................. 0.000182 .................... to this subpart which introduces pol-
pH .............................................. (2) (2) lutants into a publicly owned treat-
1 The limitations for chromium and nickel shall be applicable ment works must comply with 40 CFR
in lieu of those for lead and zinc when cold rolling part 403 and achieve the following
wastewaters are treated with descaling or combination acid
pickling watewaters. pretreatment standards for existing
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0. sources.
443
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00443 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.105 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
444
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00444 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.106
SUBPART J SUBPART J
Pretreatment standards Pretreatment standards for
for existing sources new sources
SUBPART J SUBPART J
Pretreatment standards Pretreatment standards for
for existing sources new sources
445
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00445 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.107 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) Cold worked pipe and tube mills—(1) § 420.107 Effluent limitations rep-
resenting the degree of effluent re-
Using water. duction attainable by the applica-
tion of the best conventional tech-
SUBPART J
nology (BCT).
Pretreatment standards Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
for new sources
through 125.32, any existing point
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values source subject to this subpart must
for any one for 30 con- achieve the following effluent limita-
day secutive
days tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 cation of the best conventional tech-
lb) of product
nology.
Chromium1 ................................. 0.0000209 0.0000084 (a) Cold rolling mills—(1) Recircula-
Lead ........................................... 0.0000094 0.0000031 tion—single stand.
446
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00446 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.107
447
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00447 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.110 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 49 (b) Continuous.
FR 21035, May 17, 1984]
SUBPART K
Subpart K—Alkaline Cleaning BPT effluent limitations
Subcategory
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
§ 420.110 Applicability; description of for any 1 ues for 30
the alkaline cleaning subcategory. day consecu-
tive days
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to discharges and to the intro- Kg/kkg (pounds per
1,000 lb) of products
duction of pollutants into publicly
owned treatment works resulting from TSS ................................................ 0.102 0.0438
operations in which steel and steel O&G ............................................... 0.0438 0.0146
products are immersed in alkaline pH .................................................. (1) (1)
cleaning baths to remove mineral and 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
animal fats or oils from the steel, and
those rinsing operations which follow § 420.113 Effluent limitations rep-
such immersion. resenting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica-
§ 420.111 Specialized definitions. tion of the best available tech-
nology economically achievable
(a) The term batch means those alka- (BAT).
line cleaning operations which process
steel products such as coiled wire, rods, The Agency has determined that
and tubes in discrete batches or bun- there are not significant quantities of
dles. toxic pollutants in alkaline cleaning
(b) The term continuous means those wastewaters after compliance with ap-
alkaline cleaning operations which plicable BPT limitations. Accordingly,
process steel products other than in since the BPT level of treatment pro-
discrete batches or bundles. vides adequate control, the Agency is
not promulgating more stringent BAT
§ 420.112 Effluent limitations rep- limitations.
resenting the degree of effluent re-
duction attainable by the applica- § 420.114 New source performance
tion of the best practicable control standards (NSPS).
technology currently available The discharge of wastewater pollut-
(BPT).
ants from any new source subject to
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 this subpart shall not exceed the stand-
through 125.32, any existing point ards set forth below.
source subject to this subpart must (a) Batch and continuous.
achieve the following effluent limita-
tions representing the degree of efflu- SUBPART K
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
New source perform-
cation of the best practicable control ance standards
technology currently available.
Average of
(a) Batch. Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30
SUBPART K day consecu-
tive days
BPT effluent limitations
Kg/kkg (pounds per
Average of 1,000 lb) of product
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- TSS ................................................ 0.0146 0.00626
day secutive
days O&G ............................................... 0.00626 0.00209
pH .................................................. (1) (1)
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 1 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
lb) of product
448
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00448 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.121
449
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00449 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.122 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum The above limitations shall be applica-
daily values
for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive days ble to each fume scrubber associated
with any of the coating operations
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 specified above.
lb) of product
[47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982; 47 FR 41739, Sept.
TSS .......................................... 0.175 0.0751 22, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 21036, May 17,
O&G ......................................... 0.0751 0.0250 1984]
Lead ......................................... 0.00113 0.000376
Zinc .......................................... 0.00150 0.000500 § 420.123 Effluent limitations rep-
Chromium (hexavalent) 1 ......... 0.000150 0.0000501 resenting the degree of effluent re-
pH ............................................ (2) 2
( ) duction attainable by the applica-
1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall apply only to tion of the best available tech-
galvanizing operations which discharge wastewaters from the nology economically achievable
chromate rinse step.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
(BAT).
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
(2) [Reserved]
through 125.32, any existing point
(b) Galvanizing and other coatings—(1)
source subject to this subpart must
Wire products and fasteners.
450
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00450 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.124
achieve the following effluent limita- The above limitations shall be applica-
tions representing the degree of efflu- ble to each fume scrubber associated
ent reduction attainable by the appli- with any of the coating operations
cation of the best available technology specified above.
economically achievable. [47 FR 23284, May 27, 1982, as amended at 49
(a) Galvanizing, terne coating and other FR 21036, May 17, 1984]
coatings—(1) Strip, sheet, and miscella-
neous products scrubbers. § 420.124 New source performance
standards (NSPS).
SUBPART L The discharge of wastewater pollut-
BAT effluent limitations ants from any new source subject to
this subpart shall not exceed the stand-
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum for daily values ards set forth below.
any 1 day for 30 con- (a) Galvanizing, terne coating and other
secutive days
coatings—(1) Strip, sheet, and miscella-
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb) neous products.
of product
SUBPART L
Lead ....................................... 0.00113 0.000376
Zinc ........................................ 0.00150 0.000500 New source performance
Chromium (hexavalent) 1 ....... 0.000150 0.0000501 standards
1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall be applica- Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
ble only to galvanizing operations which discharge wastewater Maximum for daily values
from the chromate rinse step. any 1 day for 30 con-
secutive days
(2) [Reserved] Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000 lb)
(b) Galvanizing and other coatings—(1) of product
Wire products and fasteners.
TSS ........................................ 0.0438 0.0188
SUBPART L O&G ....................................... 0.0188 0.00626
Lead ....................................... 0.000282 0.0000939
BAT effluent limitations Zinc ........................................ 0.000376 0.000125
Chromium (hexavalent)1 ........ 0.0000376 0.0000125
Average of pH .......................................... (2) (2)
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con- 1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall be applica-
day secutive days ble only to galvanizing operations which discharge
wastewaters from the chromate rinse step.
2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
lb) of product
(2) [Reserved]
Lead ......................................... 0.00451 0.00150
(b) Galvanizing and other coatings—(1)
Zinc .......................................... 0.00601 0.00200 Wire products and fasteners.
Chromium (hexavalent) 1 ......... 0.000601 0.000200
1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall be applica-
SUBPART L
ble only to galvanizing operations which discharge
wastewaters from the chromate rinse step. New source performance
standards
(2) [Reserved] Pollutant or pollutant property Average of
(c) Fume scrubbers. Maximum daily values
for any 1 for 30 con-
day secutive days
SUBPART L
Kg/kkg (pounds per 1,000
BAT effluent limitations lb) of product
Average of
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val- TSS .......................................... 0.175 0.0751
for any 1 ues for 30 O&G ......................................... 0.0751 0.0250
day consecu- Lead ......................................... 0.00113 0.000376
tive days
Zinc .......................................... 0.00150 0.000500
Chromium (hexavalent)1 .......... 0.000150 0.0000501
Kg per day
pH ............................................ (1) (1)
1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall be applica-
Lead ............................................... 0.0368 0.0123
ble only to galvanizing operations which discharge
Zinc ................................................ 0.0491 0.0164 wastewaters from the chromate rinse step.
Chromium (hexavalent) 1 ............... 0.00490 0.00163 2 Within the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
451
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00451 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.125 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Average of
§ 420.125 Pretreatment standards for Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
existing sources (PSES). for any 1 ues for 30
day consecu-
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 tive days
and 403.13, any existing source subject Kg per day
to this subpart which introduces pol-
lutants into a publicly owned treat- Lead ............................................... 0.0368 0.0123
ment works must comply with 40 CFR Zinc ................................................ 0.0491 0.0164
part 403 and achieve the following Chromium (hexavalent)1 ............... 0.00490 0.00163
pretreatment standards for existing 1 The limitations for hexavalent chromium shall be applica-
452
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00452 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 420.127
453
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00453 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 420.130 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
SUBPART LBAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS rect reduced iron and any fines that
are produced and sold commercially (as
BCT effluent limitations
opposed to fines that may be reproc-
Average of essed on site).
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum daily val-
for any 1 ues for 30 (f) For forging, the term product
day consecu- means the tons of finished steel forg-
tive days
ings produced by hot working steel
Kilograms per day shapes.
(g) The term O&G (as HEM) means
TSS ................................................ 38.1 16.3 total recoverable oil & grease meas-
O&G ............................................... 16.3 5.45
pH .................................................. (1) (1) ured as n-hexane extractable mate-
1 Within
rials.
the range of 6.0 to 9.0.
454
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00454 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 421
455
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00455 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 421 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
421.13 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- practicable control technology currently
resenting the degree of effluent reduction available.
attainable by the application of the best 421.43 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available technology economically resenting the degree of effluent reduction
achievable. attainable by the application of the best
421.14 [Reserved] available technology economically
421.15 Standards of performance for new achievable.
sources. 421.44 Standards of performance for new
421.16 Pretreatment standards for new sources.
sources. 421.45 [Reserved]
421.46 Pretreatment standards for new
Subpart B—Primary Aluminum Smelting sources.
Subcategory 421.47 [Reserved]
456
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00456 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 421
421.72 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart J—Primary Tungsten Subcategory
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best 421.100 Applicability: Description of the pri-
practicable control technology currently mary tungsten subcategory.
available. 421.101 Specialized definitions.
421.73 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 421.102 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically practicable control technology currently
achievable. available.
421.74 Standards of performance for new 421.103 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.75 Pretreatment standards for existing attainable by the application of the best
sources. available technology economically
achievable.
421.76 Pretreatment standards for new
421.104 Standards of performance for new
sources.
sources.
421.77 [Reserved]
421.105 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart H—Primary Zinc Subcategory 421.106 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
421.80 Applicability: Description of the pri-
mary zinc subcategory. 421.107 [Reserved]
421.81 Specialized definitions.
Subpart K—Primary Columbium-Tantalum
421.82 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best 421.110 Applicability: Description of the pri-
practicable control technology currently mary columbium-tantalum subcategory.
available. 421.111 Specialized definitions.
421.83 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 421.112 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
available technology economically practicable control technology currently
achievable. available.
421.84 Standards of performance for new 421.113 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.85 Pretreatment standards for existing attainable by the application of the best
sources. available technology economically
421.86 Pretreatment standards for new achievable.
sources. 421.114 Standards of performance for new
421.87 [Reserved] sources.
421.115 Pretreatment standards for existing
Subpart I—Metallurgical Acid Plants sources.
Subcategory 421.116 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
421.90 Applicability: Description of the met- 421.117 [Reserved]
allurgical acid plants subcategory.
421.91 Specialized definitions. Subpart L—Secondary Silver Subcategory
421.92 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
421.120 Applicability: Description of the sec-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
ondary silver subcategory.
attainable by the application of the best
421.121 Specialized definitions.
practicable control technology currently
421.122 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
available.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.93 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- attainable by the application of the best
resenting the degree of effluent reduction practicable control technology currently
attainable by the application of the best available.
available technology economically 421.123 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
achievable. resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.94 Standards of performance for new attainable by the application of the best
sources. available technology economically
421.95 Pretreatment standards for existing achievable.
sources. 421.124 Standards of performance for new
421.96 Pretreatment standards for new sources.
sources. 421.125 Pretreatment standards for existing
421.97 [Reserved] sources.
457
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00457 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 421 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
421.126 Pretreatment standards for new 421.156 Pretreatment standards for new
sources. sources.
421.127 [Reserved] 421.157 [Reserved]
458
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00458 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency Pt. 421
attainable by the application of the best 421.242–421.243 [Reserved]
practicable control technology currently 421.244 Standards of performance for new
available. sources.
421.213 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 421.245 Pretreatment standards for existing
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources.
attainable by the application of the best 421.246 Pretreatment standards for new
available technology economically sources.
achievable. 421.247 [Reserved]
421.214 Standards of performance for new
sources. Subpart W—Primary Precious Metals and
421.215 [Reserved] Mercury Subcategory
421.216 Pretreatment standards for new
sources. 421.250 Applicability: Description of the pri-
421.217 [Reserved] mary precious metals and mercury sub-
category.
Subpart T—Secondary Molybdenum and 421.251 Specialized definitions.
Vanadium Subcategory 421.252 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.220 Applicability: Description of the sec- attainable by the application of the best
ondary molybdenum and vanadium sub- practicable control technology currently
category. available.
421.221 Specialized definitions. 421.253 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
421.222 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best available technology economically
practicable control technology currently achievable.
available. 421.254 Standards of performance for new
421.223 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
sources.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.255 [Reserved]
attainable by the application of the best
421.256 Pretreatment standards for new
available technology economically
sources.
achievable.
421.257 [Reserved]
421.224 Standards of performance for new
sources.
421.225 [Reserved]
Subpart X—Secondary Precious Metals
421.226 Pretreatment standards for new Subcategory
sources.
421.260 Applicability: Description of the sec-
421.227 [Reserved]
ondary precious metals subcategory.
421.261 Specialized definitions.
Subpart U—Primary Nickel and Cobalt 421.262 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
Subcategory resenting the degree of effluent reduction
421.230 Applicability: Description of the pri- attainable by the application of the best
mary nickel and cobalt subcategory. practicable control technology currently
421.231 Specialized definitions. available.
421.232 Effuent limitations guidelines rep- 421.263 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently available technology economically
available. achievable.
421.233 Effuent limitations guidelines rep- 421.264 Standards of performance for new
resenting the degree of effluent reduction sources.
attainable by the application of the best 421.265 Pretreatment standards for existing
available technology economically sources.
achievable. 421.266 Pretreatment standards for new
421.234 Standards of performance for new sources.
sources. 421.267 [Reserved]
421.235 [Reserved]
421.236 Pretreatment standards for new Subpart Y—Primary Rare Earth Metals
sources. Subcategory
421.237 [Reserved]
421.270 Applicability: Description of the pri-
Subpart V—Secondary Nickel Subcategory mary rare earth metals subcategory.
421.271 Specialized definitions.
421.240 Applicability: Description of the sec- 421.272–421.273 [Reserved]
ondary nickel subcategory. 421.274 Standards of performance for new
421.241 Specialized definitions. sources.
459
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00459 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Pt. 421 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
421.275 Pretreatment standards for existing available technology economically
sources. achievable.
421.276 Pretreatment standards for new 421.304 Standards of performance for new
sources. sources.
421.277 [Reserved] 421.305 Pretreatment standards for existing
sources.
Subpart Z—Secondary Tantalum 421.306 Pretreatment standards for new
Subcategory sources.
421.307 [Reserved]
421.280 Applicability: Description of the sec-
ondary tantalum subcategory. Subpart AC—Secondary Tungsten and
421.281 Specialized definitions. Cobalt Subcategory
421.282 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 421.310 Applicability: Description of the sec-
attainable by the application of the best ondary tungsten and cobalt subcategory.
practicable control technology currently 421.311 Specialized definitions.
available. 421.312 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
421.283 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- resenting the degree of effluent reduction
resenting the degree of effluent reduction attainable by the application of the best
attainable by the application of the best practicable control technology currently
available technology economically available.
achievable. 421.313 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
421.284 Standards of performance for new resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
421.285 [Reserved] available technology economically
421.286 Pretreatment standards for new achievable.
sources. 421.314 Standards of performance for new
421.287 [Reserved] sources.
421.315 Pretreatment standards for existing
Subpart AA—Secondary Tin Subcategory sources.
421.316 Pretreatment standards for new
421.290 Applicability: Description of the sec- sources.
ondary tin subcategory 421.317 [Reserved]
421.291 Specialized definitions.
421.292 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- Subpart AD—Secondary Uranium
resenting the degree of effluent reduction Subcategory
attainable by the application of the best
practicable control technology currently 421.320 Applicability: Description of the sec-
available. ondary uranium subcategory.
421.293 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 421.321 Specialized definitions.
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 421.322 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
attainable by the application of the best resenting the degree of effluent reduction
available technology economically attainable by the application of the best
achievable. practicable control technology currently
421.294 Standards of performance for new available.
sources. 421.323 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
421.295 Pretreatment standards for existing resenting the degree of effluent reduction
sources. attainable by the application of the best
421.296 Pretreatment standards for new available technology economically
sources. achievable.
421.297 [Reserved] 421.324 Standards of performance for new
sources.
Subpart AB—Primary and Secondary 421.325 [Reserved]
Titanium Subcategory 421.326 Pretreatment standards for new
sources.
421.300 Applicability: Description of the pri- 421.327 [Reserved]
mary and secondary titanium sub-
category. Subpart AE—Primary Zirconium and
421.301 Specialized definitions. Hafnium Subcategory
421.302 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction 421.330 Applicability: Description of the pri-
attainable by the application of the best mary zirconium and hafnium sub-
practicable control technology currently category.
available. 421.331 Specialized definitions.
421.303 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- 421.332 Effluent limitations guidelines rep-
resenting the degree of effluent reduction resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best attainable by the application of the best
460
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00460 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.11
practicable control technology currently less of the number of samples analyzed
available. and averaged.
421.333 Effluent limitations guidelines rep- (b) Periodic analysis for cyanide are
resenting the degree of effluent reduction
attainable by the application of the best
not required for a facility in the pri-
available technology economically mary beryllium subcategory (subpart O
achievable. of this part) when both of the following
421.334 Standards of performance for new conditions are met:
sources. (1) The first wastewater sample
421.335 [Reserved] taken in each calandar year has been
421.336 Pretreatment standards for new analyzed and found to contain less
sources. than 0.07 mg/1 cyanide.
421.337 [Reserved]
(2) The owner or operator of the pri-
AUTHORITY: Secs. 301, 304 (b), (c), (e), and mary beryllium manufacturing facility
(g), 306 (b) and (c), 307 (b) and (c), 308 and 501 certifies in writing to the POTW au-
of the Clean Water Act (the Federal Water thority or permit issuing authority
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972,
that cyanide is neither generated nor
as amended by the Clean Water Act of 1977)
and the Water Quality Act of 1987 (the used in the beryllium manufacturing
‘‘Act’’); 33 U.S.C. 1311, 1314 (b), (c), (e), and process employed at that facility.
(g), 1316 (b) and (c), 1317 (b) and (c), 1318 and [49 FR 8790, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 55 FR
1361; 86 Stat. 816, Pub. L. 92–500; 91 Stat. 1567, 31697, Aug. 3, 1990]
Pub. L. 95–217; 101 Stat. 7, Pub. L. 100–4.
SOURCE: 49 FR 8790, Mar. 8, 1984, unless oth- § 421.4 Compliance date for
erwise noted. pretreatment standards for existing
sources (PSES).
GENERAL PROVISIONS The PSES compliance deadline in
§ 421.1 Applicability. subparts A through M is March 8, 1987.
The PSES compliance deadline for
This part applies to facilities pro- plants in subparts N through AE is
ducing primary metals from ore con- September 20, 1988.
centrates and recovering secondary
metals from recycle wastes which dis- [50 FR 52776, Dec. 26, 1985]
charge or may discharge pollutants to
§ 421.5 Removal allowances for
waters of the United States or which pretreatment standards.
introduce or may introduce pollutants
into a publicly owned treatment works. Removal allowances pursuant to 40
The applicability of this part to CFR 403.7(a) may be granted for the
alloying or casting of nonferrous met- toxic metals limited in 40 CFR part 421
als is limited to alloying or casting of when used as indicator pollutants.
hot metal directly from the nonferrous
metals manufacturing process without Subpart A—Bauxite Refining
cooling. Remelting followed by Subcategory
alloying or cooling is included in the
aluminum forming, nonferrous metals § 421.10 Applicability; description of
forming, or metal molding and casting the bauxite refining subcategory.
point source categories. The provisions of this subpart are ap-
plicable to discharges resulting from
§ 421.2 [Reserved] the refining of bauxite to alumina by
§ 421.3 Monitoring and reporting re- the Bayer process or by the combina-
quirements. tion process.
The following special monitoring re- [39 FR 12825, Apr. 8, 1974]
quirements apply to all facilities con-
trolled by this regulation: § 421.11 Specialized definitions.
(a) The monthly average regulatory For the purpose of this subpart:
values shall be the basis for the month- (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
ly average discharge in direct dis- eral definitions, abbreviations and
charge permits and for pretreatment methods of analysis set forth in part
standards. Compliance with the month- 401 of this chapter shall apply to this
ly discharge limit is required regard- subpart.
461
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00461 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.12 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(b) The term bauxite shall mean ore (b) During any calendar month there
containing alumina monohydrate or may be discharged from the overflow of
alumina trihydrate which serves as the a process waste water impoundment ei-
principal raw material for the produc- ther a volume of process waste water
tion of alumina by the Bayer process or equal to the difference between the
by the combination process. precipitation for that month that falls
(c) The term product shall mean alu- within the impoundment and the evap-
mina. oration within the impoundment for
(d) For all impoundments the term that month, or, if greater, a volume of
within the impoundment for purposes of process waste water equal to the dif-
calculating the volume of process ference between the mean precipitation
wastewater which may be discharged, for that month that falls within the
shall mean the surface area within the impoundment and the mean evapo-
impoundment at the maximum capac- ration for that month as established by
ity plus the area of the inside and out- the National Climatic Center, National
side slopes of the impoundment dam Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra-
and the surface area between the out- tion, for the area in which such im-
side edge of the impoundment dam and poundment is located (or as otherwise
seepage ditches upon which rain falls determined if no monthly data have
and is returned to the impoundment. been established by the National Cli-
For the purpose of such calculations, matic Center).
the surface area allowance for external [39 FR 12825, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 50
appurtenances to the impoundment FR 38342, Sept. 20, 1985]
shall not be more than 30 percent of
the water surface area within the im- § 421.13 Effluent limitations guidelines
poundment dam at maximum capacity. representing the degree of effluent
(e) The term pond water surface area reduction attainable by the applica-
for the purpose of calculating the vol- tion of the best available tech-
ume of waste water shall mean the nology economically achievable.
area within the impoundment for rain- Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
fall and the actual water surface area through 125.32, any existing point
for evaporation. source subject to this subpart shall
achieve the following effluent limita-
[39 FR 12825, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 40
FR 48348, Oct. 15, 1975] tions representing the degree of efflu-
ent reduction attainable by the appli-
§ 421.12 Effluent limitations guidelines cation of the best available technology
representing the degree of effluent economically achievable:
reduction attainable by the applica- (a) Subject to the provisions of para-
tion of the best practicable control graph (b) of this section, the following
technology currently available. limitations establish the quantity or
Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30 quality of pollutants or pollutant prop-
through 125.32, any existing point erties which may be discharged by a
source subject to this subpart, shall point source subject to the provisions
achieve the following effluent limita- of this subpart after application of the
tions representing the degree of efflu- best available technology economically
ent reduction attainable by the appli- achievable: There shall be no discharge
cation of the best practicable control of process waste water pollutants to
technology currently available: navigable waters.
(a) Subject to the provisions of para- (b) During any calendar month there
graph (b) of this section, the following may be discharged from the overflow of
limitations establish the quantity or a process waste water impoundment ei-
quality of pollutants or pollutant prop- ther a volume of process waste water
erties which may be discharged by a equal to the difference between the
point source subject to the provisions precipitation for that month that falls
of this subpart after application of the within the impoundment and the evap-
best practicable control technology oration within the impoundment for
currently available: There shall be no that month, or, if greater, a volume of
discharge of process waste water pol- process waste water equal to the dif-
lutants to navigable waters. ference between the mean precipitation
462
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00462 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.22
for that month that falls within the Subpart B—Primary Aluminum
impoundment and the mean evapo- Smelting Subcategory
ration for that month as established by
the National Climatic Center, National § 421.20 Applicability: description of
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- the primary aluminum smelting
tion, for the area in which such im- subcategory.
poundment is located (or as otherwise The provisions of this subpart are ap-
determined if no monthly data have plicable to discharges resulting from
been established by the National Cli- the production of aluminum from alu-
matic Center). mina in the Hall-Heroult process.
[39 FR 12825, Apr. 8, 1974, as amended at 50
FR 38342, Sept. 20, 1985] § 421.21 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
§ 421.14 [Reserved] (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
eral definitions, abbreviations and
§ 421.15 Standards of performance for
new sources. methods of analysis set forth in part
401 of this chapter, shall apply to this
(a) Subject to the provisions of para- subpart.
graph (b) of this section, the following (b) The term product shall mean hot
standards of performance establish the aluminum metal.
quantity or quality of pollutants or (c) If a permittee chooses to analyze
pollutant properties which may be dis- for benzo(a)pyrene using any EPA-ap-
charged by a new source subject to the proved method, any ‘‘non-detected’’
provisions of this subpart: There shall measurements shall be considered ze-
be no discharge of process waste water roes for the purpose of determining
pollutants to navigable waters. compliance with this regulation.
(b) During any calendar month there
may be discharged from the overflow of [49 FR 8792, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 52 FR
25556, July 7, 1987]
a process waste water impoundment ei-
ther a volume of process waste water § 421.22 Effluent limitations guidelines
equal to the difference between the representing the degree of effluent
precipitation for that month that falls reduction attainable by the applica-
within the impoundment and the evap- tion of the best practicable control
oration within the impoundment for technology currently available.
that month, or, if greater, a volume of Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
process waste water equal to the dif- through 125.32, any existing point
ference between the mean precipitation source subject to this subpart shall
for that month that falls within the achieve the following effluent limita-
impoundment and the mean evapo- tions representing the degree of efflu-
ration for that month as established by ent reduction attainable by the appli-
the National Climatic Center, National cation of the best practicable tech-
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra- nology currently available (BPT):
tion, for the area in which such im-
poundment is located (or as otherwise Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
determined if no monthly data have day average
been established by the National Cli-
matic Center). Metric units—kg/kkg of
product
[39 FR 12825, Apr. 8, 1974] English units—lbs/
thousand lbs of product
§ 421.16 Pretreatment standards for
new sources. Fluoride ...................................... 2.0 1.0
Total Suspended solids ............. 3.0 1.5
Any new sources subject to this sub-
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
part which introduces pollutants into a
1 Within the range of 6 to 9 at all times.
publicly owned treatment works must
comply with 40 CFR part 403.
[49 FR 8792, Mar. 8, 1984; 49 FR 29794, July 24,
[50 FR 38342, Sept. 20, 1985] 1984]
463
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00463 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.23 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
464
VerDate jul<14>2003 01:27 Aug 05, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00464 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.23
465
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00465 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.23 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
466
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00466 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.24
[49 FR 8792, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 52 FR NSPS—Continued
25556, July 7, 1987]
Maximum Maximum
§ 421.24 Standards of performance for Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
new sources.
Any new source subject to this sub- Oil and grease ........................... .000 .000
Total suspended solids ............. .000 .000
part shall achieve the following new
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
source performance standards:
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times.
(a) Subpart B—Anode and Cathode
Paste Plant Wet Air. (d) Subpart B—Cathode Reprocessing
POLLUTION CONTROL—NSPS (Operated With Dry Potline Scrubbing
and Not Commingled With Other Proc-
Maximum Maximum ess or Nonprocess Waters).
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
NSPS
mg/kg (pound per million
pounds) of paste produced Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... .000 ....................
Antimony .................................... .000 .000
Nickel ......................................... .000 .000 mg/kg (pound per million
Aluminum ................................... .000 .000 pounds) of cryolite re-
Fluoride ...................................... .000 .000 covered
Oil and grease ........................... .000 .000
Total suspended solids ............. .000 .000 Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... 1.181 0.547
pH .............................................. (1) (1) Antimony .................................... 420.400 189.200
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times. Cyanide ..................................... 157.600 70.060
Nickel ......................................... 80.570 35.030
(b) Subpart B—Anode Contact Cool- Aluminum ................................... 273.200 122.600
ing and Briquette Quenching. Fluoride ...................................... 29,430.000 13,310.000
Oil and grease ........................... 350.300 350.300
NSPS Total suspended solids ............. 2,172.000 945.800
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly 1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times.
day average
(e) Subpart B—Cathode Reprocessing
mg/kg (pound per million
pounds) of anodes cast
(Operated With Dry Potline Scrubbing
and Commingled With Other Process or
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... 0.007 0.003 Nonprocess Waters).
Antimony .................................... .403 .180
Nickel ......................................... .115 .077 NSPS
Aluminum ................................... 1.277 .566
Fluoride ...................................... 12.440 5.518
Maximum Maximum
Oil and grease ........................... 2.090 2.090 Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Total suspended solids ............. 3.135 2.508 day average
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times. mg/kg (pound per million
pounds) of cryolite re-
(c) Subpart B—Anode Bake Plant covered
Wet Air Pollution Control.
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... 1.181 0.547
NSPS Antimony .................................... 67.610 30.120
Cyanide ..................................... 157.600 70.060
Maximum Maximum Nickel ......................................... 19.270 12.960
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Aluminum ................................... 214.000 94.930
day average
Fluoride ...................................... 2,084.000 924.800
mg/kg (pound per million Oil and grease ........................... 350.300 350.300
pounds) of anodes baked Total suspended solids ............. 2,172.000 945.800
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... .000 .................... 1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times.
Antimony .................................... .000 .000
Nickel ......................................... .000 .000 (f) Subpart B—Potline Wet Air Pollu-
Aluminum ................................... .000 .000
Fluoride ...................................... .000 .000 tion Control.
467
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00467 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.24 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(g) Subpart B—Potroom Wet Air Pol- (j) Subpart B—Pot Repair and Pot
lution Control. Soaking.
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum
Maximum Maximum Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly day average
day average
mg/kg (pound per million
mg/kg (pound per million
pounds) of aluminum
pounds) of aluminum
produced from electro-
produced from electro-
lytic reduction
lytic reduction
468
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00468 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.26
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly (c) Subpart B—Anode Bake Plant
day average Wet Air Pollution Control.
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of aluminum PSNS
product from stationary
casting or shot casting Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... .000 ....................
Antimony .................................... .000 .000 mg/kg (pounds per million
Nickel ......................................... .000 .000 pounds) of anodes baked
Aluminum ................................... .000 .000
Fluoride ...................................... .000 .000 Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... .000 ....................
Oil and grease ........................... .000 .000 Nickel ......................................... .000 .000
Total suspended solids ............. .000 .000
Fluoride ...................................... .000 .000
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times. (d) Subpart B—Cathode Reprocessing
(Operated With Dry Potline Scrubbing
[49 FR 8792, Mar. 8, 1984; 49 FR 26739, June 29,
1984, as amended at 52 FR 25558, July 7, 1987] and Not Commingled With Other Proc-
ess or Nonprocess Waters).
§ 421.25 [Reserved]
PSNS
§ 421.26 Pretreatment standards for
Maximum Maximum
new sources. Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
any new source subject to this subpart mg/kg (pounds per million
which introduces pollutants into a pub- pounds) of cryolite re-
covered
licly owned treatment works must
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
Benzo(a)pyrene ......................... 1.181 0.547
achieve the following pretreatment Cyanide ..................................... 157.600 70.060
standards for new sources. The mass of Nickel ......................................... 80.570 35.030
wastewater pollutants in primary alu- Fluoride ...................................... 29,430.000 13,310.000
minum process wastewater introduced
into a POTW shall not exceed the fol- (e) Subpart B—Cathode Reprocessing
lowing values: (Operated With Dry Potline Scrubbing
(a) Subpart B—Anode and Cathode and Commingled With Other Process or
Paste Plant Wet Air Pollution Control. Nonprocess Waters).
469
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00469 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.26 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(f) Subpart B—Potline Wet Air Pollu- (j) Subpart B—Pot Repair and Pot
tion Control. Soaking.
PSNS PSNS
(g) Subpart B—Potroom Wet Air Pol- (k) Subpart B—Direct Chill Casting
lution Control. Contact Cooling.
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum
Maximum Maximum Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly day average
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million
mg/kg (pounds per million pounds) of aluminum
pounds) of aluminum product from direct chill
produced from electro- casting
lytic reduction
470
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00470 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.32
471
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00471 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.33 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
472
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00472 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.34
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control [49 FR 8796, Mar. 8, 1984; 49 FR 26739, June 29,
is Not Practiced On-Site). 1984, as amended at 49 FR 29794, July 24, 1984;
52 FR 25559, July 7, 1987]
BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
§ 421.34 Standards of performance for
Maximum Maximum new sources.
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average Any new source subject to this sub-
part shall achieve the following new
mg/kg (lb/million lbs) of
aluminum cast
source performance standards:
(a) Subpart C—Scrap Drying Wet Air
Lead ........................................... 0.019 0.009 Pollution Control.
Zinc ............................................ 0.068 0.028
Aluminum ................................... 0.409 0.182 NSPS
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 8.931 3.926
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
(h) Subpart C—Ingot Conveyor Cast- day average.
ing Contact Cooling (When Chloride mg/kg (pounds per million
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control pounds) of aluminum
is Practiced On Site). scrap dried
473
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00473 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.34 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
NSPS—Continued NSPS—Continued
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(d) Subpart C—Demagging Wet Air (g) Subpart C—Ingot Conveyor Cast-
Pollution Control. ing Contact Cooling (When Chlorine
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control
NSPS is Not Practiced On-Site).
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly NSPS
day average
Maximum Maximum
mg/kg (lb/million lbs) of Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
aluminum demagged day average
474
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00474 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.35
NSPS—Continued PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
Oil and grease ........................... .000 .000 mg/kg (pounds per million
pH .............................................. (1) (1) pounds) of aluminum
1Within
scrap screened and
the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times. milled
(j) Subpart C—Shot Casting Contact
Cooling. Lead ........................................... .000 .000
Zinc ............................................ .000 .000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ .000 .000
NSPS
Maximum Maximum (c) Subpart C—Dross Washing.
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
PSES
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of aluminum cast Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Lead ........................................... .000 .000
Zinc ............................................ .000 .000 mg/kg (pounds per million
Aluminum ................................... .000 .000 pounds) of dross washed
Ammonia (as N) ........................ .000 .000
Total suspended solids ............. .000 .000 Lead ........................................... 3.043 1.413
Oil and grease ........................... .000 .000 Zinc ............................................ 11.090 4.565
pH .............................................. (1) (1) Ammonia (as N) ........................ 1,449.000 636.000
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times.
(d) Subpart C—Demagging Wet Air
[49 FR 8796, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 49 FR Pollution Control.
29794, July 24, 1984; 52 FR 25559, July 7, 1987]
PSES
§ 421.35 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources. Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7 day average
and 403.13, any existing source subject
mg/kg (lb/million lbs) of
to this subpart which introduces pol- aluminum demagged
lutants into a publicly owned treat-
ment works must comply with 40 CFR Lead ........................................... 0.216 0.100
part 403 and achieve the following Zinc ............................................ 0.786 0.324
pretreatment standards for existing Amomonia (as N) ...................... 102.800 45.180
sources. The mass of wastewater pol-
lutants in secondary aluminum process (e) Subpart C—Delacquering Wet Air
wastewater introduced into a POTW Pollution Control.
shall not exceed the following values:
(a) Subpart C—Scrap Drying Wet Air PSES
Pollution Control.
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
PSES day average
(b) Subpart C—Scrap Screening and (f) Subpart C—Direct Chill Casting
Milling. Contact Cooling.
475
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00475 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.36 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSES PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(g) Subpart C—Ingot Conveyor Cast- [49 FR 8796, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 49 FR
ing Contact Cooling (When Chlorine 29794, July 24, 1984; 52 FR 25560, July 7, 1987]
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control
is Not Practiced On-Site). § 421.36 Pretreatment standards for
new sources.
PSES Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7,
Maximum Maximum
any new source subject to this subpart
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly which introduces pollutants into a pub-
day average licly owned treatment works must
mg/kg (lb/million lbs) of comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
aluminum cast achieve the following pretreatment
standards for new sources. The mass of
Lead ........................................... 0.019 0.009 wastewater pollutants introduced in
Zinc ............................................ 0.068 0.028 secondary aluminum process waste-
Amomonia (as N) ...................... 8.931 3.926 water into a POTW shall not exceed
the following values:
(h) Subpart C—Ingot Conveyor Cast- (a) Subpart C—Scrap Drying Wet Air
ing Contact Cooling. (When Chlorine Pollution Control.
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control
is Practiced On Site.) PSNS
476
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00476 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.36
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
PSNS
(i) Subpart C—Stationary Casting
Maximum Maximum Contact Cooling.
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
PSNS
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of aluminum Maximum Maximum
delacquered Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
(f) Subpart C—Direct Chill Casting (j) Subpart C—Shot Casting Contact
Contact Cooling. Cooling.
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Maximum Maximum
day average Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of aluminum cast mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of aluminum cast
Lead ........................................... .372 .173
Zinc ............................................ 1.356 .558 Lead ........................................... .000 .000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 177.200 77.880 Zinc ............................................ .000 .000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ .000 .000
(g) Subpart C—Ingot Conveyor Cast-
ing Control Cooling (When Chlorine [49 FR 8796, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 49 FR
Demagging Wet Air Pollution Control 29794, July 24, 1984; 52 FR 25560, July 7, 1987]
is Not Practiced On-Site).
477
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00477 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.37 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
478
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00478 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.52
479
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00479 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.53 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
480
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00480 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.56
NSPS—Continued NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
481
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00481 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.57 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) Subpart E—Spent Electrolyte. of new and used copper scrap and resi-
dues to produce copper metal and cop-
PSNS per alloys, but are not applicable to
Maximum Maximum continuous rod casting.
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
§ 421.61 Specialized definitions.
mg/kg (pounds per million For the purpose of this subpart:
pounds) of cathode cop-
per production (a) Except as provided below, the gen-
eral definitions, abbreviations, and
Arsenic ....................................... .068 .031 methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
Copper ....................................... .063 .030
Nickel ......................................... .027 .018
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(b) For all impoundments con-
(d) Subpart E—Casting Wet Air Pol- structed prior to the effective date of
lution Control. this regulation the term ‘‘within the
impoundment’’ when used for purposes
PSNS of calculating the volume of process
Maximum Maximum
wastewater which may be discharged
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly shall mean the water surface area
day average
within the impoundment at maximum
mg/kg (pounds per million capacity plus the surface area of the
pounds) of casting pro- inside and outside slopes of the im-
duction
poundment dam as well as the surface
Arsenic ....................................... .000 .000 area between the outside edge of the
Copper ....................................... .000 .000 impoundment dam and any seepage
Nickel ......................................... .000 .000 ditch immediately adjacent to the dam
upon which rain falls and is returned to
(e) Subpart E—By-Product Recovery. the impoundment. For the purpose of
PSNS such calculations, the surface area al-
lowances set forth above shall not be
Maximum Maximum more than 30 percent of the water sur-
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average face area within the impoundment dam
at maximum capacity.
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of product re-
(c) For all impoundments con-
covered from electrolytic structed on or after the effective date
slimes processing of this regulation, the term ‘‘within
the impoundment’’ for purposes of cal-
Arsenic ....................................... .000 .000
Copper ....................................... .000 .000
culating the volume of process waste-
Nickel ......................................... .000 .000 water which may be discharged shall
mean the water surface area within the
[49 FR 8801, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 49 FR impoundment at maximum capacity.
29795, July 24, 1984] (d) The term pond water surface area
when used for the purpose of calcu-
§ 421.57 [Reserved] lating the volume of wastewater which
may be discharged shall mean the
Subpart F—Secondary Copper water surface area of the pond created
Subcategory by the impoundment for storage of
process wastewater at normal oper-
SOURCE: 49 FR 8802, Mar. 8, 1984, unless oth- ating level. This surface shall in no
erwise noted. case be less than one-third of the sur-
face area of the maximum amount of
§ 421.60 Applicability: Description of water which could be contained by the
the secondary copper subcategory. impoundment. The normal operating
The provisions of this subpart are ap- level shall be the average level of the
plicable to discharges resulting from pond during the preceding calendar
the recovery, processing, and remelting month.
482
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00482 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.64
483
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00483 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.65 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
484
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00484 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.72
485
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00485 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.73 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
486
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00486 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.74
(i) Subpart G—Facility Washdown. Any new source subject to this sub-
part must achieve the following per-
formance standards:
(a) Subpart G—Sinter Plant Mate-
rials Handling Wet Air Pollution Con-
trol.
487
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00487 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.74 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
NSPS NSPS—Continued
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
488
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00488 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.75
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
489
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00489 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.75 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) Subpart G—Blast Furnace Slag (g) Subpart G—Hard Lead Refining
Granulation. Slag Granulation.
PSES PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
PSES PSES
490
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00490 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.76
PSES PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
491
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00491 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.77 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
PSNS
Subpart H—Primary Zinc
Subcategory
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average SOURCE: 49 FR 8808, Mar. 8, 1984, unless oth-
erwise noted.
mg/kkg (pounds per billion
pounds) of lead bullion § 421.80 Applicability: Description of
produced
the primary zinc subcategory.
The provisions of this subpart are ap-
Lead ........................................... .000 .000 plicable to discharges resulting from
Zinc ............................................ .000 .000 the production of primary zinc by ei-
ther electrolytic or pyrolytic means.
(j) Subpart G—Employee Handwash.
§ 421.81 Specialized definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart:
(a) Except as provided below, the gen-
eral definitions, abbreviations, and
492
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00492 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.83
493
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00493 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.84 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(f) Subpart H—Casting Wet Air Pollu- mg/kg (pounds per million
tion Control. pounds) of zinc reduced
494
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00494 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.85
NSPS NSPS—Continued
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(f) Subpart H—Casting Wet Air Pollu- § 421.85 Pretreatment standards for
existing sources.
tion Control.
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7
NSPS and 403.13, any existing source subject
to this subpart which introduces pol-
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly lutants into a publicly owned treat-
day average ment works must comply with 40 CFR
mg/kg (pounds per million part 403 and achieve the following
pounds) of zinc cast pretreatment standards for existing
sources. The mass of wastewater pol-
Cadmium ................................... .051 .021 lutants in primary zinc process waste-
Copper ....................................... .329 .157
Lead ........................................... .072 .033
water introduced into a POTW shall
Zinc ............................................ .262 .108 not exceed the following values:
Total suspended solids ............. 3.855 3.084 (a) Subpart H—Zinc Reduction Fur-
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
nace Wet Air Pollution Control.
1 Within the range of 7.5 to 10.0 at all times.
495
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00495 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.86 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSES PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
496
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00496 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.86
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
(c) Subpart H—Leaching Wet Air Pol- (g) Subpart H—Casting Contact Cool-
lution Control. ing.
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
497
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00497 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.87 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Pollutant or pollutant property Maximum Maximum [50 FR 38343, Sept. 20, 1985, as amended at 55
for any 1 for monthly FR 31697, Aug. 3, 1990]
day average
498
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00498 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.102
499
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00499 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.102 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
(c) Subpart J—Alkali Leach Wash. (f) Subpart J—Ion Exchange Raf-
finate (Not Commingled With Other
BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS Process or Nonprocess Waters).
Condensate. apply if (a) the mother liquor feed to the ion exchange proc-
ess or the raffinate from the ion exchange process contains
sulfates at concentrations exceeding 1000 mg/l; (b) this moth-
er liquor or raffinate is treated by ammonia steam stripping;
and (c) such mother liquor or raffinate is not commingled with
any other process or nonprocess waters prior to steam strip-
ping for ammonia removal.
500
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00500 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.102
501
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00501 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.103 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Total suspended solids ............. 98.400 46.800 mg/kg (pounds per million
pH .............................................. (1) (1) pounds) of tungstic acid
(as W) produced
1 Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times.
Lead ........................................... 1.003 0.466
(n) Subpart J—Molybdenum Sulfide Zinc ............................................ 3.653 1.504
Precipitation Wet Air Pollution Con- Ammonia (as N) ......................... 477.400 209.900
trol.
(c) Subpart J—Alkali Leach Wash.
BPT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
BAT EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Maximum Maximum
day average Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of tungsten mg/kg (pounds per million
metal produced pounds) of sodium
tungstate (as W) pro-
Lead ........................................... .000 .000 duced
Zinc ............................................ .000 .000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ .000 .000 Lead ........................................... 0.000 0.000
Total suspended solids ............. .000 .000 Zinc ............................................ 0.000 0.000
pH .............................................. (1) (1) Ammonia (as N) ......................... 0.000 0.000
502
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00502 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.103
503
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00503 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.104 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
504
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00504 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.104
505
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00505 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.105 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
Lead ........................................... .672 .312 (b) Subpart J—Acid Leach Wet Air
Zinc ............................................ 2.448 1.008 Pollution Control.
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 319.900 140.700
Total suspended solids ............. 36.000 28.800 PSES
pH .............................................. (1) (1)
Maximum Maximum
1Within the range of 7.0 to 10.0 at all times. Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
(n) Subpart J—Molybdenum Sulfide
mg/kg (pounds per million
Precipitation Wet Air Pollution Con- pounds) of tungstic acid
trol. (as W) produced
506
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00506 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.105
PSES PSES—Continued
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
mg/kg (pounds per million Ammonia (as N)1 ....................... 11,790.000 5,185.000
pounds) of tungstate (as 1 Thepretreatment standard for this pollutant does not apply
W) produced if (a) the mother liquor feed to the ion exchange process or
the raffinate from the ion exchange process contains sulfates
at concentrations exceeding 1000 mg/l; (b) this mother liquor
Lead ........................................... 0.000 0.000 or raffinate is treated by ammonia steam stripping; and (c)
Zinc ............................................ 0.000 0.000 such mother liquor or raffinate is not commingled with any
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 0.000 0.000 other process or nonprocess waters prior to steam stripping
for ammonia removal.
PSES PSES
Maximum Maximum
Maximum Maximum Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly day average
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million
mg/kg (pounds per million pounds) of calcium
pounds) of sodium tungstate (as W) pro-
tungstate (as W) pro- duced
duced
Lead ........................................... 20.670 9.594
Lead ........................................... 5.372 2.494 Zinc ............................................ 75.280 31.000
Zinc ............................................ 19.570 8.057 Ammonia (as N) ........................ 9,838.000 4,325.000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 2,557.000 1,124.000
(h) Subpart J—Crystallization and
(e) Subpart J—Ion Exchange Raf- Drying of Ammonium Paratungstate.
finate (Commingled With Other Proc-
ess or Nonprocess Waters). PSES
Maximum Maximum
PSES Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly mg/kg (pounds per million
day average pounds) of ammonium
paratungstate (as W)
mg/kg (pounds per million produced
pounds) of tungstate (as
W) produced Lead ........................................... 0.000 0.000
Zinc ............................................ 0.000 0.000
Lead ........................................... 24.780 11.500 Ammonia (as N) ........................ 0.000 0.000
Zinc ............................................ 90.240 37.160
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 11,790.000 5,185.000 (i) Subpart J—Ammonium
Paratungstate Conversion to Oxides
(f) Subpart J—Ion Exchange Raf- Wet Air Pollution Control.
finate (Not Commingled With Other
Process or Nonprocess Waters). PSES
Maximum Maximum
PSES Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly mg/kg (pounds per million
day average pounds) of tungstic oxide
(as W) produced
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of ammonium Lead ........................................... 0.773 0.359
tungstate (as W) pro- Zinc ............................................ 2.817 1.160
duced Ammonia (as N) ........................ 368.200 161.900
507
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00507 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.106 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSES PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
508
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00508 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.106
PSNS PSNS—Continued
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
day average day average
mg/kg (pounds per million) Ammonia (as N)(1) .................... 11,790.000 5,185.000
of sodium tungstate (as 1 The pretreatment standard for this pollutant does not apply
W) produced if a) the mother liquor feed to the ion exchange process or the
raffinate from the ion exchange process contains sulfates at
concentrations exceeding 1000 mg/l; b) this mother liquor or
Lead ........................................... 0.000 0.000 raffinate is treated by ammonia steam stripping; and c) such
Zinc ............................................ 0.000 0.000 mother liquor or raffinate is not commingled with any other
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 0.000 0.000 process or nonprocess waters prior to steam stripping for am-
monia removal.
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum
Maximum Maximum Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly day average
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million)
mg/kg (pounds per million) of calcium tungstate (as
of sodium tungstate (as W) produced
W) produced
Lead ........................................... 20.670 9.594
Lead ........................................... 5.372 2.494 Zinc ............................................ 75.280 31.000
Zinc ............................................ 19.570 8.057 Ammonia (as N) ........................ 9,838.000 4,325.000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 2,557.000 1,124.000
(h) Subpart J—Crystallization and
(e) Subpart J—Ion Exchange Raf- Drying of Ammonium Paratungstate.
finate (Commingled With Other Proc-
ess or Nonprocess Waters). PSNS
Maximum Maximum
PSNS Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
day average
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly mg/kg (pounds per million)
day average of ammonium
paratungstate (as W)
mg/kg (pounds per million) produced
of ammonium tungstate
(as W) produced
Lead ........................................... 0.000 0.000
Lead ........................................... 24.780 11.500 Zinc ............................................ 0.000 0.000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 0.000 0.000
Zinc ............................................ 90.240 37.160
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 11,790.000 5,185.000
(i) Subpart J—Ammonium
(f) Subpart J—Ion Exchange Raf- Paratungstate Conversion to Oxides
finate (Not Commingled With Other Wet Air Pollution Control.
Process or Nonprocess Waters). PSNS
PSNS Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
Maximum Maximum day average
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
day average mg/kg (pounds per million)
of tungstic oxide (as W)
mg/kg (pounds per million) produced
of ammonium tungstate
(as W) produced Lead ........................................... 0.773 0.359
Zinc ............................................ 2.817 1.160
Lead ........................................... 24.780 11.500 Ammonia (as N) ........................ 368.200 161.900
Zinc ............................................ 90.240 37.160
(j) Subpart J—Ammonium
Paratungstate Conversion to Oxides
Water of Formation.
509
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00509 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.107 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any one for monthly
day average day average
510
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00510 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.112
511
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00511 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.113 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
512
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00512 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.113
513
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00513 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.114 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
Maximum Maximum AA1 Within the range of 7.5 to 10.0 at all times.
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average (c) Subpart K—Solvent Extraction
mg/kg (pounds per million
Wet Air Pollution Control.
pounds) of columbium or
tantalum cast or consoli- NSPS
dated
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
Lead ........................................... .000 .000 day average
Zinc ............................................ .000 .000
Ammonia (as N) ........................ .000 .000 mg/kg (pounds per million
Fluoride ...................................... .000 .000 pounds) of concentrate
digested
514
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00514 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.114
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
NSPS NSPS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
515
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00515 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.115 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
NSPS PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
516
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00516 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.115
PSES—Continued PSES
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
517
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00517 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.116 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)
[49 FR 8817, Mar. 8, 1984, as amended at 50 FR PSNS—Continued
12253, Mar. 28, 1985]
Maximum Maximum
§ 421.116 Pretreatment standards for Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
new sources.
Except as provided in 40 CFR 403.7, Zinc ............................................ .251 .103
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 32.790 14.420
any new source subject to this subpart Fluoride ...................................... 8.610 4.920
which introduces pollutants into a pub-
licly owned treatment works must
(d) Subpart K—Precipitation and Fil-
comply with 40 CFR part 403 and
tration.
achieve the following pretreatment
standards for new sources. The mass of PSNS
wastewater pollutants in primary co-
lumbium-tantalum process wastewater Maximum Maximum
introduced into a POTW shall not ex- Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
ceed the following values:
(a) Subpart K—Concentrate Diges- mg/kg (pounds per million
tion Wet Air Pollution Control. pounds) of concentrate
digested
PSNS
Lead ........................................... 3.833 1.780
Maximum Maximum Zinc ............................................ 13.960 5.750
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Ammonia (as N) ........................ 1,825.000 802.200
day average
Fluoride ...................................... 479.100 273.800
mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of concentrate (e) Subpart K—Precipitation and Fil-
digested
tration Wet Air Pollution Control.
Lead ........................................... .174 .081
Zinc ............................................ .635 .261
PSNS
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 82.910 36.450
Fluoride ...................................... 21.770 12.440 Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average
(b) Subpart K—Solvent Extraction
Raffinate. mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of concentrate
digested
PSNS
Maximum Maximum for Lead ........................................... 1.778 .826
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 monthly Zinc ............................................ 6.478 2.668
day average Ammonia (as N) ........................ 846.600 372.200
mg/kg (pounds per million Fluoride ...................................... 222.300 127.000
pounds) of concentrate di-
gested (f) Subpart K—Tantalum Salt Dry-
ing.
Lead ......................................... 2.592 1.203
Zinc .......................................... 9.442 3.888 PSNS
Ammonia (as N) ...................... 1,233.000 542.5000
Fluoride .................................... 324.000 185.100 Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
(c) Subpart K—Solvent Extraction day average
Wet Air Pollution Control. mg/kg (pounds per million
pounds) of tantalum salt
PSNS dried
Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Lead ........................................... 16.950 7.871
day average Zinc ............................................ 61.750 25.430
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 8,070.000 3,548.000
mg/kg (pounds per million Fluoride ...................................... 2,119.000 1,211.000
pounds) of concentrate
digested
(g) Subpart K—Oxides Calcining Wet
Lead ........................................... .069 .032 Air Pollution Control.
518
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00518 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
Environmental Protection Agency § 421.122
PSNS PSNS
Maximum Maximum Maximum Maximum
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly
day average day average
Lead ........................................... 46.500 21.590 SOURCE: 49 FR 8821, Mar. 8, 1984, unless oth-
Zinc ............................................ 169.400 69.750 erwise noted.
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 22,140.000 9,732.000
Fluoride ...................................... 5,813.000 3,322.000
§ 421.120 Applicability: Description of
(i) Subpart K—Reduction of Tan- the secondary silver subcategory.
talum Salt to Metal Wet Air Pollution The provisions of this subpart are ap-
Control. plicable to discharges resulting from
the production of silver from secondary
PSNS silver facilities processing photo-
Maximum Maximum graphic and nonphotographic raw ma-
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly terials.
day average
mg/kg (pounds per million [49 FR 8821, Mar. 8, 1984; 49 FR 26739, June 29,
pounds) of tantalum salt 1984]
reduced
§ 421.121 Specialized definitions.
Lead ........................................... .572 .266
Zinc ............................................ 2.084 .858 For the purpose of this subpart the
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 272.400 119.700 general definitions, abbreviations, and
Fluoride ...................................... 71.510 40.860
methods of analysis set forth in 40 CFR
part 401 shall apply to this subpart.
(j) Subpart K—Tantalum Powder
Wash. § 421.122 Effluent limitations guide-
lines representing the degree of ef-
PSNS
fluent reduction attainable by the
Maximum Maximum application of the best practicable
Pollutant or pollutant property for any 1 for monthly control technology currently avail-
day average
able.
mg/kg (pounds per million Except as provided in 40 CFR 125.30
pounds) of tantalum
powder washed through 125.32, any existing point
source subject to this subpart shall
Lead ........................................... 5.721 2.656 achieve the following effluent limita-
Zinc ............................................ 20.840 8.582
Ammonia (as N) ........................ 2,724.000 1,198.000
tions representing the degree of efflu-
Fluoride ...................................... 715.200 408.700 ent reduction attainable by the appli-
cation of the best practicable tech-
(k) Subpart K—Consolidation and nology currently available:
Casting Contact Cooling. (a) Subpart L—Film Stripping.
519
VerDate Jan<31>2003 10:46 Jul 22, 2003 Jkt 200164 PO 00000 Frm 00519 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\200164T.XXX 200164T
§ 421.122 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–03 Edition)