De La Salle University – Dasmariñas

COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND COMPUTER STUDIES

MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS DEPARTMENT
City of Dasmariñas, Cavite

SMATH001LA – Data Analytics for Engineering

2nd Semester / Midterm Period / S.Y. 2020-2021

LABORATORY ACTIVITY #3 Commented [cg1]: Don’t forget to edit this for the next
Hypothesis Testing to ANOVA lab activity
Score:
NAME: DE JESUS, Darid Jienne B. DATE: 11/10/2021
COURSE/YEAR & SECTION: BSA26 PROF.: Sir Dhenmar Chua

OBJECTIVES Commented [cg2]: Always include the objectives as you

1. Create a pivot table and data visualization in Microsoft Excel. submit your pdf file
2. Clearly organize and compute detailed information about the three data sets. Make sure that the filename for excel and pdf file follow the
3. Graph and calculate several descriptive measures of the data set using a variety of methods given format:
surname_section_laboratory exercise1.

Don’t forget to edit the lab exercise number

TASKS, RESULTS, INTERPRETATION
Commented [cg3]: This is where you have to present the
following:
Categorical Data Clearly indicate the TASK
Tasks: The RESULT
Your INTERPRETATION

HYPOTHESIS 1.1: Once done, you may now submit the files needed in SB
Step 1: State the null and alternative hypothesis through Dropbox Assessment

Ho There is no significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the

employees when they are grouped according to gender
Ha There is a significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees
when they are grouped according to gender

Step 2: Level of significane and the sample size

Given:
a 0.5
n1 60
n2 60

Step 3: Test Statistic

Test Statistic: ANOVA Single Factor

Step 4: Critical Region

Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F critical or if the p-value is less than
0.05 Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Computation

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY

Groups Count Sum Average Variance

Male Job 60 242.11 4.035166667 0.317191497

Satisfaction
 Female Job 60 256.89 4.2815 0.11474178
Satisfaction

ANOVA

Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit

Variation
Between 1.820403333 1 1.820403333 8.429095099 0.004408441 3.921478181
Groups
Within 25.48406333 118 0.215966638
Groups

Total 27.30446667 119

Step 6: Decision

Reject the null hypothesis, since F computed (8.429) is > F critical (3.921). In addition p-value
(0.004) is < 0.5

Step 7: Conclusion

We reject the null hypothesis. Based on our decision, f computed is higher than f critical and
the p-value is lower than our significance level. Therefore, there is a significant level job satisfaction
of employees according to their gender.

HYPOTHESIS 1.2
Step 1: State the null and alternative hypothesis

Ho There is no significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees
when they are grouped according to job satisfaction
Ha There is a significant difference among the level of job satisfaction of the employees
when they are grouped according to job satisfaction

Step 2: Level of significane and the sample size

Given:
a 0.5
n1 61
n2 59

Step 3: Test Statistic

Test Statistic: ANOVA Single Factor

Step 4: Critical Region

Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F critical or if the p-value is less than
0.05 Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Computation

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Outsourced Job 60 241.04 4.017333333 0.291724972
Satisfaction
Regular Job 59 253.69 4.299830508 0.132863764
Satisfaction

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
Variation
Between 2.374020799 1 2.3740209799 11.14703685 0.001129376 3.922172691
Groups
Within 24.91787164 117 0.21973262
Groups

Total 27.29189244 118

Step 6: Decision

Reject the null hypothesis, since F computed (11.147) is > F critical (3.922). In addition p-
value(0.001) is < 0.5

Step 7: Conclusion

We cannot reject the null hypothesis because based on our decision, f computed is higher
than f critical and the p-value is greater than our significance level. This means there is a significant
difference among the level of job satisfaction of employees according to their job status.

HYPOTHESIS 2.2

Step 1: State the null and alternative hypothesis

Ho . There is no significant difference among the level of job performance of the

employees when they are grouped according to
Ha . There is a significant difference among the level of job performance of the
employees when they are grouped according to

Step 2: Level of significane and the sample size

Given
a 0.5
n1 40
n2 40
n3 40

Step 3: Test Statistic

Test Statistic: ANOVA Single Factor

Step 4: Critical Region

Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F critical or if the p-value is less than
0.05 Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Computation

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
MA GRADUATE 40 158.91 3.97275 0.262943526
Job Performance
MA UNITS Job 40 153.74 3.8435 0.301341282
Performance
BS/AB Job 40 145.07 3.62675 0.268350705
Performance

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
Variation
Between 2.445361667 2 1.222680833 4.405339964 0.01430206 3.073762904
Groups
 Within 32.472785 117 0.277545171
Groups

Total 34.91814667 119

Step 6: Decision

Reject the null hypothesis, since F computed (4.405) is > F critical (3.073). In addition p-value
(0.014) is < level of significance 0.5.

Step 7: Conclusion

We reject the null hypothesis. Based on our decision, f computed is higher than f critical and
the p-value is lower than our significance level. In conclusion, there is is a significant level of job
satisfaction of the employees according to their educational attainment.

HYPOTHESIS 2.2:

Step 1: State the null and alternative hypothesis

Ho . There is no significant difference among the level of job performance of the

employees when they are grouped according to
Ha . There is a significant difference among the level of job performance of the
employees when they are grouped according to

Step 2: State the level of significance and identify the test statistic

Given:
a 0.5
n1 30
n2 30
n3 30
n4 30
120
Step 3: Test Statistic

Test Statistic: ANOVA Single Factor

Step 4: Critical Region

Reject the null hypothesis if F computed is greater than F critical or if the p-value is less than
0.05 Otherwise, fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Computation

Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
7 and below 30 113.63 3.787666667 0.192039195

8-15 years 30 106.72 3.557333333 0.283544368

 16-23 years 30 117.92 3.930666667 0.231130575

24-31 years 30 119.73 3.991 0.396988621

ANOVA
Source of SS df MS F P-value F crit
Variation

Between 3.344486667 3 1.114828889 4.040322923 0.008978978 2.682809407

Groups
Within 32.00738 116 0.27592569
Groups

Total 35.35186667 119

Step 6: Decision

Reject the null hypothesis, since F computed (4.040) is > F critical (2.683). In addition, p-value
(0.009) is < 0.5

Step 7: Conclusion

We reject the null hypothesis. Based on our decision, f computed is higher than f critical and
the p-value is lower than our significance level (0.5). We can therefore conclude that there is a
significant difference among the level of job performance of the employees according to their
length of service.