Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PROBLEM SET 4
INDEPENDENT t-TEST
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. Use the six steps hypothesis test in analysing the ff problems.
2. Submit the summarized result and the outputs after analysis. (TURN IN THE
GOOGLE CLASS IN PDF)
HA: There is a significant difference in the achievement test scores between the group
with a previous computer science course and the group without a previous computer
science course.
C. ESTABLISH THE LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE (USUALLY SET TO 0.05 LEVEL FOR
SOCIAL RESEARCHES UNLESS SPECIFIED)
Specify the α level: α = .05
D. DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE TEST STATISTICS
Independent T-Test because we want to compare the means of two
groups to see if they are statistically different from each other.
SUMMARY TABLE/S:
VARIABLE / GROUPINGS MEAN SD T- PROB
VALUE (SIG. 2
TAILED)
GROUP 1 (WITH) 33.12 4.8
6.6 0.00
GROUP 2 (WITHOUT) 21.66 5.2
2. Two methods were used to study the latent heat of ice fusion. Both method
A (an electrical method) and method B (a method of mixtures) were
conducted with the specimens cooled to – 0.72○ C. The data in the following
table present the change in total heat from – 0. 72○ C to water at 0○ C in
calories per gram of mass.
Method A 71.97 72.84 71.82 72.84 77.81 71.01 77.04 79.17 73.05 71.03
Method B 68.32 63.84 63.88 64.86 63.86 65.03 66.95 68.96 64.02 61.54
HA: There is a significant difference in the change in total heat between method A and
method B.
SUMMARY TABLE/S:
VARIABLE / GROUPINGS MEAN SD T- PROB
VALUE (SIG. 2
TAILED)
Method A 73.85 2.99
7.3 0.00
Method B 65.12 2.29
SUMMARY TABLE/S:
VARIABLE / GROUPINGS MEAN SD T- PROB
VALUE (SIG. 2
TAILED)
Flavor 1 (A) 996.33 343.61
-0.72 -0.47
Flavor 2 (B) 1293.77 1179.49
4. Trace metals in drinking water affect the flavor and an unusually high
concentration can pose a health hazard. Ten pairs of data were taken
measuring zinc concentration in bottom water and surface water. Does the
data suggest that the true average concentration in the bottom water
exceeds that of surface water?
Location
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Zinc
concentration
.830 .266 .568 .531 .808 .816 .651 .589 .769 .723
in bottom
water
Zinc
concentration
.415 .228 .290 .410 .205 .209 .332 .523 .411 .312
in surface
water
DV: flavor
IV: Zinc concentration
B. STATE THE NULL AND ALTERNATIVE HYPOTHESIS
HO: The true average concentration of zinc in bottom water is equal to or less than
that of surface water.
HA: The true average concentration of zinc in bottom water exceeds that of surface
water.
SUMMARY TABLE/S:
VARIABLE / GROUPINGS MEAN SD T- PROB
VALUE (SIG. 2
TAILED)
Bottom water .655 .175
0.203 0.00
Surface water .333 .105
SUMMARY TABLE/S:
VARIABLE / GROUPINGS MEAN SD T- PROB
VALUE (SIG. 2
TAILED)
MOTIVE (BY GENDER) 1.000 .00000
3.9007 .35776
-7.893 .000
JOBPERF (BY GENDER)
Since the P-value is less than our desired significance threshold (P <0.05), we
reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. This means that there
is significant difference between motive and job performance when grouped by
gender.
Group Statistics
Equal
variances .908 .342 -7.893 178 .000 -.43822 .05552 -.54778 -.32867
assumed
MOTIVESAND
Equal
JOBPERFS
variances
-7.893 176.946 .000 -.43822 .05552 -.54778 -.32866
not
assumed