You are on page 1of 1

Grading Rubric for Ortho Assignment (Diagnostic Test and Outcome Measures)

3 2 1 0
Content: The description is clear and The description is clear but The description is clear but Only description of the test is
Description of includes the purpose, interpretation missing one of the following missing two from the following included. No linking to the ICF
the tests and population of the test. The test (purpose, interpretation or (purpose, interpretation or model
is linked correctly with explanation population). The test is linked population). The test is linked
to ICF model correctly to ICF model incorrectly to ICF model
Content: Validity/reliability of the study is Validity/reliability of the study is Validity/reliability of the study is Validity/reliability of the study is
Validity And well described including the author well described but missing one of well described but missing two of missing three or more of the
Reliability name & year of publication, values the following: author name & year the following: author name & year following: author name & year of
of validity reliability, of publication, values of validity of publication, values of validity publication, values of validity
sensitivity..etc. sample size and reliability, sensitivity..etc. sample reliability, sensitivity..etc. sample reliability, sensitivity..etc. sample
procedures used size and procedures used size and procedures used size and procedures used
Conclusion: Impression is well written and Impression is written with Impression is written with Impression is written without
Impression of emphasis justification and emphasis of justification and emphasis of justification and justification or evidence
the test evidence supporting the evidence supporting the evidence supporting the
impression. The impression is impression as related to physical impression
linked to physical therapy practice therapy
with details and example
Research: Included more than 3 reliable Included information from at least Included factual information from Work did not have information
Quality, information from primary sources three secondary and primary multiple secondary sources. Used from any primary sources. Included
quantity and and secondary sources. sources. information from one primary information from only one
documentation Citation is included in text and in Citation is used in text and in source. secondary
references consistently. Following references appropriately but Citation is inconsistently and source. Citation is inconsistently
one style only (APA or AMA) missing some consistency incorrectly included and incorrectly included
Writing- No spelling, grammar, Fewer than 5 spelling and More than 5 spelling and grammar More than 10 spelling and
Conventions: capitalization or punctuation grammar errors. Fewer than 5 errors. More than 5 capitalization grammar errors. More than 10
Correct errors. Sentences are all well capitalization and punctuation and punctuation errors. Less than capitalization and punctuation
spelling, formed errors. One or two flawed 5 sentences show flawed structure. errors. Many sentences show
grammar, sentences. flawed structure.
punctuation,
usage

You might also like