The document provides criteria for evaluating philosophical article writing on the introduction to the philosophy of the human person. It rates submissions on a scale from outstanding to needs improvement based on how fully they cover the expected concepts, their level of creativity, evidence of planning, depth of philosophical reflection, ability to integrate values, and attitude towards the project. A submission receiving the highest rating would completely and accurately address all relevant concepts, convey ideas in a personal way while citing important references, show smooth writing that helps readers follow the logic, and provide specific examples to illustrate philosophical points.
The document provides criteria for evaluating philosophical article writing on the introduction to the philosophy of the human person. It rates submissions on a scale from outstanding to needs improvement based on how fully they cover the expected concepts, their level of creativity, evidence of planning, depth of philosophical reflection, ability to integrate values, and attitude towards the project. A submission receiving the highest rating would completely and accurately address all relevant concepts, convey ideas in a personal way while citing important references, show smooth writing that helps readers follow the logic, and provide specific examples to illustrate philosophical points.
The document provides criteria for evaluating philosophical article writing on the introduction to the philosophy of the human person. It rates submissions on a scale from outstanding to needs improvement based on how fully they cover the expected concepts, their level of creativity, evidence of planning, depth of philosophical reflection, ability to integrate values, and attitude towards the project. A submission receiving the highest rating would completely and accurately address all relevant concepts, convey ideas in a personal way while citing important references, show smooth writing that helps readers follow the logic, and provide specific examples to illustrate philosophical points.
Introduction to the Philosophy of the Human Person (Philosophical Article
Writing)
Criteria Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Fair Needs Improvement
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Content (X2) All concepts that All concepts that are All concepts that Most concepts that are The topic is are expected to be expected to be are expected to be expected to be incomplete and presented are discussed are discussed are discussed are committed major complete and presented presented presented accurate misconceptions and accurate with no accurate \with 1 accurate with 2 with minor errors. misconceptions or misconception or misconceptions or misconceptions or errors within the error. errors errors. specified length of the medium used. Creativity The way that the The video was Most of the The video was lacking The contents of the (X1) ideas conveyed made on a personal explanations are personal touches and video were obviously and explained level with most on a personal were just a pure copied and there was were on a examples from level. Important narration of facts. no evident effort in personal level. All personal references are Most of the contents producing an original examples given experiences. cited. were copied from one composition are based on or various sources. personal experiences and important references were cited. Evidence of In addition to The newsletter Word choice Sentence structure, Rough draft quality Planning meeting the writer has taken sometimes word choice, lack of (X1) requirements for pains to assist the interfere with transitions and/or the newsletter, reader in following clarity. Needs to sequencing of ideas writing flows the logic of the improve make viewing and smoothly from one ideas expressed. sequencing of understanding difficult idea to another Sentences are ideas and structured and transitions to words are chosen to make the communicate ideas writing/viewing clearly. Sequencing easy to follow. of ideas and transitions make the writer’s/speaker’s points easy to follow. Depth of Provides specific Provides some Examples Examples provided No examples are Philosophica examples to examples to provided are are vague and need given to illustrate or l illustrate and/or illustrate and/or vague and need specification. support ideas. reflection(x4) support ideas support ideas specification, yet discussed discussed but may quite sensible be underspecified. Values Student has a very Student has a Student has a Student is lukewarm Student has a Integration / positive attitude positive attitude positive attitude about the project as negative attitude about Attitude about the project about the project as about the project, evidenced in his/her the project towards the as evidenced in evidenced in his/her yet some willingness to accept project (x2) his/her willingness willingness to expected outputs the task yet failed to to accept the task; accept the task; and tasks were accomplish certain willing to work not given on time; task at a specified even beyond time willing to work time frame; even beyond time