Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kurt Lewin devised one of the most important models for understanding
organisational transformation, and it still remains true today. Unfreeze –
Transformation – Refreeze is the name of his model, which relates to the
three-stage change process he explains. Lewin, a physicist and social
scientist, used the analogy of changing the shape of a block of ice to
explain organisational development.
Efforts to develop and rejuvenate the potentials of human systems are also
exploited, obscured, and thwarted by technological developments. For
example, re-engineering change initiatives targeted at improving
organisational efficiency take survey methodologies from more enlightened
Lewinian action research, but they are applied for reasons that are
incompatible with humanitarian values. The emphasis is on increasing
short-term production while stressing human systems, as well as
community development, work-life quality, and employee participation in
issue solving. For example, Lewin's work on the force-field model of
change is employed in autocratic procedures to strategize and implement
top-down management choices.
We observed that our client group mostly followed a democratic style of working, as
every member had an equal say in the decision-making process. However, we also
noted that in some situations a particular member’s opinion was given priority over
others. We also inferred from our experience that leaders and managers may
change their styles and be trained to enhance their leadership and adopt suitable
management styles for their situation and context.
Group members were involved and engrossed in discussion of the issues among
themselves and were able to make their own decisions as a group most of the
times. Whenever two members from client group were having conflicting ideas,
they were asked to present pros and cons of their idea or theory, then group
would vote on which one is better. Also, theory which will have more pros will be
selected and a theory was selected when all the members were convinced. Client
group also checked which member’s theory is closer to model assigned to them.
Our client group was using this methodology for group decision making.
3. Action research:
The involvement of participants from the community under study, as well as the
pursuit of separate but concurrent processes of action and evaluation, are central to
action research. We followed a similar approach where we looked & evaluated all the
members of the group individually, as well as evaluated the group as a whole.
Principles that stand out for your group across the phases of consulting we
engaged in-
5. Practitioners who are absolutely clear on the what, how, and why of
their techniques give value when delivering feedback to clients about
solutions. Remember to be sensitive to your client's desire for
complete transparency and clarity. This is best accomplished by
utilising "simple speech," which means avoiding jargon and technical
terms specific to your field. Instead, when delivering feedback or
expressing your results and any recommendations that follow, use
industry- or institution language.