COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool is aligned with the Sendai Framework for DRR (SFDRR) and the global Comprehensive School Safety Framework (CSSF) developed by the UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction
(UNISDR). As a signatory to the SFDRR, the Philippine Government is expected to report to the UNISDR its accomplishment in implementing the SFDRR. In line with this, the Department of Education is required to report its accomplishment in
implementing Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM)/School Safety to the National DRRM Council (NDRRMC) as a member of the said council, and in accordance to RA 10121 (Philippine DRRM Act of 2010) which reflects the country's
commitment to the SFDRR.
This school level Comprehensive School Safety Monitoring Tool aims to:
1) establish the baseline with respect to the implementation of the 3 pillars of DepEd's Comprehensive DRRM in Education Framework (DO 37, s 2015);
2) Set the school's DRRM targets for 3 years, based on the baseline;
3) Track the annual progress of the school with respect to its targets.
This is primarily for the use of the School DRRM Team whose members are expected to facilitate the completion of this monitoring tool. The Head of the SDRRM Team shall submit the completed forms with the signature of he School Head to the Division
DRRM Coordinator. The Division DRR Coordinator is expected to orient the SDRRM Team on how this tool is going to be filled-up, monitor the completion of schools and consolidate the results of all schools using the template also provided by the
DRRMS Central Office. The consolidated results shall be submitted by the Division DRRM Coordinator to the DRRMS Central Office in ____________ of the current school year.
The 1st column indicates the particular Priority for Action in the SFDRR that are related to the Targets of the global CSSF in the 2nd column. The 3rd column indicates DepEd's Comprehensive School Safety indicators at the school level that are related to
columns 1 and 2. The school level DepEd indicators are based on the Department's Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (DRRM) policies and the School DRRM Manual (SDRRM). The 4th column sets the baseline of the school with respect to
DepEd's indicators in the 3rd column. Supporting evidences, such as documents, should be provided by the School DRRM Team to the Division DRRM Coordinator. The 5th column sets the targets/plans of the school based on its baseline. The remaining
columns will be accomplished by the school on an annual basis to indicate progress against the targets set for 3 years.

Name of Head/Focal Person of School DRRM Team: Designation:

School ID: Name of School: Municipality/City:
Name of Division DRRM Coordinator: CIRILO K. RUBIATO II Division/Region: REGION X - MISAMIS ORIENTAL
Date the Division DRRM Coordinator Oriented the SDRRM Team: JUNE 27-29, 2017
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS) TARGET
for DRR (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
AREAS
(SFDRR)
Priorities
YES NO
Priority for 1 Adopted/Adapted/localized existing policies relating to DRRM in
Legal Frameworks & Policies
Action 2 education/school safety
Organizational arrangements, 2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person
Priority for leadership, and coordination 3 Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from different
Action 2 for risk reduction and offices; with defined membership and roles and responsibilities/functions
resilience
4 Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes CCA and EiE
Integration of risk reduction measures, covering risk assessment, risk reduction, and rehabilitation
Priority for and resilience into education and recovery
Action 1 sector strategies, policies and 5 Students participated in the planning process
plans 6 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS
8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget
Funding for risk reduction 9 Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster or
Priority for
and resilience of education emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
Action 3
sector 10 School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its DRRM
programs and activities, including those after a disaster

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 1 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS) TARGET
for DRR (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
AREAS
(SFDRR)
Priorities
YES NO
11 Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping (DO 23 s
2015)
12 Incorporated results of student-led school watching and hazard mapping
Priority for Child-centered Risk in the School DRRM Plan and SIP
Action 1 Assessment 13 Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with the
community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST
14 School Planning Team have linked the community hazard maps with
education data to better understand the school’s risk
15 School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report (RADAR) to the
DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after the onslaught of a hazard in
the area
Priority for 16 Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on DRRM,
Monitoring and Evaluation covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact exist
Action 3

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 2 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
TARGETS
(SFDRR)
Priorities
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically NO.
Assessment and 1 # of school buildings that has been inventoried
Priority for prioritization for retrofiting
2 # of school buildings with risk assessment
Action 1 and replacement of unsafe
schools 3 # of unsafe school buildings identified
YES NO
Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school building
4 construction exist
Resources and Plan to
Priority for Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed action
address unsafe school 5 to address unsafe school buildings within a specified period
Action 3
buildings
# of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action undertaken by
6 the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted, non-usage, etc.)

Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of facilities

7
conducted (state how often)
Undertaken regular repair of minor classroom (including facilities)
8
Maintenance to increase damages
Priority for
safety and protection of Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Action 3 9
investments in schools documented and assigned
School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of
10 school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
School Heads have identified those schools that are expected to
11
be used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters
Planning for limited use of School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the school
Priority for schools as evacuation in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as per Joint
Action 4 centers, during the school Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013 "Guidelines on
year 12
Evacuation Center Coordination and Management" and RA 10821
"Children's Emergency Relief and Protection Act" and its
corresponding IRR
Every new school built is safe
13 Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
Guidance and regulations
Priority for safe school site selection
for safe school
Action 2 resilient design, and
construction
resilient construction
14 New school construction is monitored for compliance with:
Monitoring of safe school
Priority for safe school site selection
site selection, design and
Action 2 safe school design
construction
safe school construction

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 3 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS
Framework BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS) (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM
for DRR (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
TARGETS Manual)
(SFDRR)
Priorities
YES NO
School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan
1 turned into response actions when a disaster strikes (This
could be a separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in
2
every instructional classroom
School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment,
3 in case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base
radio, generator, etc.)
Existence of national School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary
and sub-national plans 4
Learning spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster
for preparedness and School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
Priority for
response, educational 5 delivery modes to ensure education continuity
Action 4
continuity, and
protection of education School has ensured that students completed the Family
6 Earthquake Prepareness Plan; and school has reported
sector investments
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office
School has established a school personnel tracking
7 system/protocol in the event of a disaster

School has trained personnel to administer first aid to

8
students and personnel
9 School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and
studentshas trained teachers and other personnel who could
School
10 provide psychosocial support to students

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 4 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
TARGETS
(SFDRR)
Priorities
YES NO
Annual review of school School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are reviewed
11
disaster risk reduction and annually
Priority for management measures (e.g. Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and preparedness
12
Action 4 as part of school-based measures are in place as per DO
management and/or school Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders participated in
improvement) 13 Brigada Eskwela

School has established functional early warning system to inform

Conduct of regular simulation
drill, at all levels, to practice
Priority for
response preparedness and 15
Action 4
to review response plans (i.e.
Contingency Plan)
Needs assessment, strategy,
and implementation plan to
Priority for
develop staff and student
Action 3
capacity for participation in
school based DRRM
students and personnel of hazards and emergencies (protocol, warning
14
signs, devices, IEC), considering national and LGU warning systems
and protocols
School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3 hazards) with
participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs, NGOs, community,
PTA, alumni, and others)
16 # of students who participated in the drills
17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures
School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
18
disseminated to students, teachers and parents
School Head has received DRRM training from division or region or
19
partners
School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from division or region
20
or partners (indicate how many)
School has conducted awareness and capacity building for families and
21
learners
School participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of the LGU
22

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 5 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool

COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL
PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION
Related
Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS BASELINE TARGETS/ PLANS PROGRESS PROGRESS PROGRESS
School Safety (CSS)
for DRR (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School DRRM Manual) (2017) (2018-2020) (2018) (2019) (2020)
TARGETS
(SFDRR)
Priorities
School has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in the curriculum
1 YES NO
based on the National Curriculum Guide
Integration of common risk
Priority for 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
reduction and resilience
Action 3 3 Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been integrated
messages in the curriculum
Skills and competencies of students are assessed through measurable
YES NO
learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes
Percentage of students actively participating in various DRRM/CCA/EiE
Intergration of risk reduction
Priority for activities
and resilience in extra- 4
Action 3
curricular activities
School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and school
Capacity building for and 5 YES NO
Priority for personnel
personnel on risk reduction
Action 3 Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA
and resilience education 6 YES NO

Schoo has available and accessible quality and up-to-date DRRM

7 YES NO
materials
Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted in it, in
8 YES NO
every classroom
Priority for School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess sustainable
Monitoring and Evaluation 9 YES NO
Action 3 implementation

Name and Signature of School Head:

Date Signed and Approved:

Page 6 of 6 CSS Monitoring Tool