Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5th Joint Meeting of Analysis of the Effects on Pronunciation of Training by Using Song or Native Speech
the Acoustical Society of America
and the Acoustical Society of Japan
Saori Nemoto, Ian Wilson, Jeremy Perkins
Honolulu, Hawaii – Dec. 1, 2016 University of Aizu
Spoken
Spoken
Spoken
2. Foreign accent 400 400 400
condition yielded overall higher scores
108 native or near-native listeners evaluated those audio samples.
3. Intonation (independent of pre- or post-training) was also
Introduction Data Collection & Analysis:
200 200 200
seen (α = 0.600, z = 2.89, p < 0.01). This may
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
0 0 0
less than spoken counterparts. [1] speech) had higher Judgment ratings prior to any
600
training effect.
600 600
• Sung lyrics are often unintelligible for listeners because listeners
have significant difficulty in discriminating different sung vowels. [2] • Training with the music stimuli had a negative
Music
Music
Music
400 400 400
effect on ratings in the post-training condition (α =
• Music changes pitch and rhythmic patterns of phrase. It makes 200
–0.349, z = –3.39, p < 0.01). It shows training by
200 200
understanding more difficult for the listeners. [3] 10 mins training using regular speech is more effective for English
0
learners than training by using songs.
0 0
• Recently, many Japanese junior high schools use English songs as Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent
Judgement Judgement Judgement
a resource for learning English pronunciation. To investigate • Our results suggest that if Japanese learners of
Pre-recording Post-recording Judgement Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Fig. 3
whether practicing English music affects English pronunciation or English want to improve their English
not might be helpful for future planning of Japanese English Criteria: All_my_life Criteria: Foreign accent Criteria: Intonation pronunciation, it is reasonable for learners to use
education. Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post spoken speech rather than sung speech.
• We used R to analyze 108 data samples 800
Spoken
Spoken
Spoken
Use sung speech • Training by using sung speech resulted in generally worse 400 400
400 more varied, generalizable results.
listener judgements than training by regular speech. Results
for each of the criteria can be seen to the right in Figs. 1~6. 200 200 200 References
[1] Lauren B. Collister and David Huron (2008). Comparison of Word
Frequency
Frequency
Frequency
30 Japanese participants Control group (15): Intelligibility in Spoken and Sung Phrases. Empirical Musicology Review,
Use spoken speech • The two criteria, “right here” (Fig.3) and intonation (Fig.6) had 0 0 0
from University of Aizu 800 3(3): 109-125.
significant interactions relative to the default “all my life”.
600 600 [2] Smith, L.A. & Scott, B.L. (1980). Increasing the intelligibility of sung
600 vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 67(5): 1795-1797.
• The criteria “right here” (Fig.3) shows that the phrase “right
Music
Music
Music
here” got negatively affected by training on sung speech. The 400 400 400 [3] Edward Wickham (2013). From Speech to Song: A Response to
number of “Bad” ratings decreased after spoken training, but Johnson, Huron and Collister on the Interaction of Music and Lyrics.
Empirical Musicology Review, 9(1): 25-28.
increased after music training. 200 200 200
12 native or near-native 96 native English • The criteria intonation (Fig.6) shows, perhaps surprisingly, 0 0 0
Acknowledgments
English listeners from listeners from • We would like to thank all participants who
that the intonation of the whole sentence was negatively Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent
Judgement
Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent
Judgement
Bad Normal Good Excellent Bad Normal Good Excellent
Judgement
Rose-Hulman Institute of Amazon Mechanical generously shared their time for this experiment.
Technology JUDGEMENT Turk affected by training on sung speech. Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6