Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Literature Seminar #3
2015.8.22 (Sat.)
Yusuke Shimizu (M2)
Respiration
2H2O O2 + 4H+ + 4e-
Photosynthesis
1
Today’s Topics
0. Introduction
1. Backgrounds of PCET
Brief introduction of definition and thermodynamics of PCET,
avoiding quantum mechanical discussion (difficult to understand for many of organic chemists!)
4. Summary
2
Backgrounds of PCET
3
Nernst Equation
Nernst equation
E°: standard potential
R : universal gas constant
T : abusolute temperature
F : Faradey constant
a : activity
4
pH-Dependent Thermodynamics
Variation of redox potential with pH for cis-[RuII(bpy)2(py)(H2O)]2+
Meyer first coined the term “Proton-Coupled Electron Transfer” and applied it to the reaction below.
The term PCET was used to distinguish it from sequential ET-PT or PT-ET, and H-Atom Transfer
6
Termiology
The term PCET has come to be used more broadly to describe reactions and half reactions
in which both electrons and protons are transferred without regard to mechanism.
7
Sequential vs Concerted
Comproportionation reaction between RuIV/II (at pH 7)
Both ET-PT and PT-ET impose high reaction barrier in initial steps
∆G°’ in ET-PT and PT-ET are lager than experimental free energy of activation
(ruling these mechanisms out as major contribution)
EPT has a significant advantage in avoiding high energy intermediate
8
HAT vs EPT
Alternative concerted pathway, H-atom transfer (HAT)
EPT
e-/H+ transfer from different orbitals on the donor to different orbitals on the acceptor
9
MS-EPT
Oxidation of Tyrosine
ET-PT is slow because of high energy intemediate (kET-PT = 1.7 ✕ 102 M-1s-1)
PCET
concerted PCET
ET-PT HAT
EPT
PT-ET MS-EPT
11
PCET in Biological Events
12
Photosystem II
Key function of PS II is water oxidation
Photooxidation catalyzed by Oxygen-evolving complex
(Kok cycle)
Iwata, S. et al. Science, 2004, 303, 1831 Dau, H. et. al. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 18222
13
PCET in Photosystem II
Yz oxidation to generate tyrosyl radical
NH
N
O
FAD
hv
R
N N O
NH
N
H
O Vos, M. H. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 14394
FADH
active site
17
Robert R. Knowles
Noncovalent interactions
Knowles, R. R.; Lin, S.; Jacobsen, E. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 5030
19
Robert R. Knowles
Tarantino, K. T.; Liu, P.; Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10022
20
Precedent
Aerobic C-H oxidation with Pacman system
V-H BDFE
Unfortunately, pKa and E° are interdependent and inversely correlated 55~58 kcal/mol
BDFE range is limited Norton, J. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 4250
(Even with one of the weakest HAT donor, BDFE > 50 kcal/mol)
“Effective” bond dissociation free energy Kinetic advantages of concerted PCET
BDFE formalism can be applied to MS-EPT,
while no bond is homolytically cleaved
‘BDFE’ = 1.37 pKa(HX) + 23.06 E°(Red) + Csolv
pKa and E° are independent with each other
‘BDFE’ < 50 kcal/mol can be achieved?
23
Photoredox Catalyst
N
Redox potential (vs SCE) Redox potential (vs SCE)
N N N N
E1/2(RuIII/II) = +1.86 V E1/2(IrIV/III) = +0.77 V
N N III
II strong oxidant
Ru Ir
N N N N
E1/2(RuII/I) = -0.80 V E1/2(IrIII/II) = -2.19 V
N N N
strong reductant
Ru(bpz)32+ fac-Ir(ppy) 3
25
Ketyls
SmI2 mediated keyl-olefine cyclization
'B
DF
E'
H-X X-
H+
H
O Keq (PCET) O
Ar Me Ar Me
e-
Mn Mn+1
'BDFE' (kcal/mol) =
O-H BDFE ~26 kcal/mol
2.3RTpKa(HX) + 23.06E0(Mn) + Csolv
28
Optimization
HEH
ET RuII(bpy) 3
HEH
EtO2C CO2Et hv
CO2Me
O Ph
Me N Me H-X
RuI(bpy) 3
'BDFE'
PT PCET
entry acid catalyst redox catalyst (MeCN) % yield cis:trans
1 none Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 — 0 —
EtO2C CO2Et
2 BzOH Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 45 0 — X- RuII(bpy) 3
CO2Me
HO Ph
3 NEt3•HBF4 Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 41 0 — Me N Me
RuI(bpy) 3
X-
F
4 lutidine•HBF4 Ru(bpy)3(BAr )2 35 0 —
5 (PhO)2PO2H Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 33 78 4.6:1
C-C bond
6 pTSA Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 27 74 4.3:1 ET
formation
hv
7 (PhO)2PO2H Ir(ppy)2(dtbpy)PF6 29 93 4.8:1
8 (PhO)2PO2H fac-Ir(ppy)3 24 92 4.8:1
RuII(bpy) 3
9 lutidine•HBF4 Ir(ppy)2(dtbpy)PF6 33 74 4.9:1 H Ph RuII(bpy) 3
X- MeO2C
OH
10a (PhO)2PO2H Ru(bpy)3(BAr F)2 31 89 10:1 EtO2C CO2Et
X-
a Me N Me
BT was used in place of HEH H H-atom transfer
S
Ph
N MeO2C Ph H H
H OH
EtO2C CO2Et
SmI2 shows reversed selectivity
Me N Me
H
HEH
Tarantino, K. T.; Liu, P.; Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10022 (reductant) 29
Substrate Scope
substrate products
H
MeO2C
O O
CO2Me O HO
MeO
OMe OMe
12:1
78%
H
MeO2C
O O
CO2Me O HO
Me
Me 6:1 Me
86%
Tarantino, K. T.; Liu, P.; Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10022 30
Substrate Scope
substrate products
O H
O MeO2C
CO2Me O HO
H H
16:1
82%
O O Me
Me O OH
Me
CO2Me
H CO2Me
2:1
96%
O
O O
Me Me OH
Me CO2Me
H
CO2Me
1.2:1
78% 31
Tarantino, K. T.; Liu, P.; Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 10022
Mechanism
Flueorescenece quenching technique
pKa difference
pKa in MeCN
H
O
-0.1
Ph Me
33
Chiral Brønsted Acid Chemistry
Ground-breaking thiourea catalyzed asymmetric Strecker reaction
Uraguchi, D. and Terada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356 Akiyama, T. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 1566
cat.
36
Knowles, R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17735
Optimization Study
HEH
ET IrIII(ppy)2(dtbpy)
HEH
hv O
EtO2C CO2Et
entry acid catalyst solvent % yield % ee
Ph
N
1 (PhO)2PO2H THF 91 — Me N Me H-OP(O)(OR)2 NMe2
IrII(ppy)2(dtbpy) H
2 1 THF 89 0
3 2 THF 84 30
4 3 THF 96 58 PT PCET
5 4 THF 80 68
O OR
EtO2C CO2Et
6 5 THF 84 82 IrII(ppy)2(dtbpy) III
H P
Ir (ppy)2(dtbpy) O O OR
7 6 THF 92 89 Me N Me OP(O)(OR)2 Ph
N
8 7 THF 90 0 NMe2
H
9 8 THF 85 0
10 6 DME 90 88
C-C bond
ET
formation
11 6 C6H6 30 86
hv
12 6 CH2Cl2 99 88
13 6 MeCN 77 81
IrIII(ppy)2(dtbpy) IrIII(ppy)2(dtbpy) O
14 6 dioxane 94 92 OR
H P
15 b
6 dioxane 90 92 OP(O)(OR)2 O O OR
H
EtO2C CO2Et Ph
b
3 hr, 2 mol% photocatalyst N
R R NMe2
H-atom transfer H
R 1 R=H O O O Me N Me
Me H
2 R = 2-naphtyl P
O O Me OH
3 R = Mesityl O O
P H H
R R OH NHNMe2
O OH 4 R = 2,4,6-iPr3C6H2 Ph EtO2C CO2Et
5 R = iPr3Si 9 R = Ph
R 6 R = Ph3Si 10 R = 2-naphtyl Me N Me
H
HEH 37
(reductant)
Knowles, R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17735
Substrate Scope
38
Knowles, R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17735
Further Study
Cleavage of N-N Bond
39
Knowles, R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 17735
Bond-Weakening Chemistry
✕
PCET
40
Bond Weakening Chemistry
41
Bond-Weakening Catalysis
Tin-free Barton-McCombie Deoxygenation
Working Hypothesis
Requirement
43
Optimization Study
✕ less bulky
○ sufficiently bulky
44
Knowles. R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6440
Proposed Catalytic Cycle
Cp*2TiIIICl
O
Ph
N O CO2Me
H
N
O
ET coordination
TiIIICl(Cp*2)
O
[TiIVCl(Cp*2)]+
Ph
N O CO2Me
H
N
O N
CO2Me
Ph
O
N
O
O
PT PCET
IV
O Ti Cl(Cp*2)
N
MeO N
OH TiIVCl(Cp*2)
O OH
C-N bond Ph
N Ph N O CO2Me
O formation
O
45
Knowles. R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6440
DFT Calculations
46
Knowles. R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6440
Compatibility of Cp*2TiCl & TEMPO
Isodesmic Estimation
EPR Spectra
47
Knowles. R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6440
Substrate Scope
48
Knowles. R. R. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6440
Hydrogen Atom Transfer
vs
PCET
49
Limitation of HAT activation
Reactivity of HAT donor is highly correlated with BDFE of broken bond
50
Carboamination
Working Hypothesis
O R1
PCET
Ar
N R2
PT PCET
B H
IrIII(dF(CF3)ppy) 2(bpy)
IrII(dF(CF3)ppy) 2(bpy)
Ph CO2Me
O N O Me
Ph B H
Me N Me
Me
C-N bond
ET
formation
Ph CO2Me Ph
O O N Me
N B H
B H
Me
Me C-C bond Me IrII(dF(CF3)ppy) 2(bpy)
formation
IrII(dF(CF3)ppy) 2(bpy)
Choi. G. J. and Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9226 CO2Me 55
Substrate Scope
56
Choi. G. J. and Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9226
Substrate Scope
57
Choi. G. J. and Knowles, R. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 9226
Summary
58
Summary
Photoredox Catalysis
Chiral Brønsted Acid Proton Coupled Electron Transfer
Bond-Weakening Chemistry Ubiquitous in biology
Studied over decades
Well-established Chemistry
59
Appendix
Ambiguity between HAT and EPT
60
Appendix
Oxidation of Cumyl Alcohol
My Proposal
61
Appendix
Bond-Weakening Effect