Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/320149717
CITATION READS
1 26,979
2 authors:
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Pravin Mane on 01 October 2017.
Advances and Research in Civil Engineering and Technology - Construction Management 323
Proceedings of the Civil Engineering PG Conference 2015, Held at MAEER’s MIT, Pune-411038, 24-25 April 2015.
on the study indicates that at construction project check lists Ensure that all relevant parties involved including
are used as quality tool, quality control measure as quality in consultants, subcontractors and suppliers are included
workmanship and due importance to be given for customer in the task of quality planning for the project
satisfaction. Establish and define the purpose of the quality system
Mathews, Ueno, Kekale, Repka, Pereira and Silva (2001) In the plan, minimize the effort required to amend
divided quality tools and techniques that are in support of copies of documents
quality programs into three main types, i.e., hard quality tools, Set up a quality system development team so that the
mixing methods and soft methods. Hard quality tools are team can produce an effective plan
formal quality systems, documented quality systems, quality
Ensure that throughout the quality planning task
costs, control charts, and statistical sampling standards.
constantly focused on the customer requirements.
Mixing methods are strategy and action plans review,
flexibility of organization structure, control charts, quality
Beecroft (1999) emphasises that quality, like any other
circles, and quality planning tools. Soft methods are training,
dimension of business, must be strategically managed at the
customer satisfaction surveys, regular contact with vendors
corporate level. Many quality improvement efforts focus solely
and external organizations, actions to optimize environment
on quality improvement tools and the methodology for
impact, empowerment, self-assessment, and benchmarking.
improving specific processes; however, these efforts often
Taylor et al. (2003) concluded that senior managers’
ignore their impact on the overall business. Srinidhi (1998)
involvement, understanding and customer focus are essential
described that many firms practicing independently sound
antecedents of TQM success. Samson et al. (1999) described
management methods to implement higher quality fail because
that leadership and human resources management are among
these methods are either not aligned with the firm's strategy or
strong predictors of performance TQM practices. On
not properly coordinated with each other. Therefore, the
construction related research, Low et al. (2004) commented
studies establish that effective quality management cannot be
that top management commitment as one of the elements that
practiced in isolation from other initiatives or the overall
would reflect TQM performance measures in construction
strategy of the firm.
firms. Chin et al. (2003) found that top management
Many organizations currently invest in quality improvement
commitment is the most critical factor for the successful
programmes. However, the literature has revealed that many
implementation of ISO 9000. ISO 9000 deals with the
companies felt that the quality improvement programmes had
fundamentals of quality management systems (Quality
fallen short of their expectations and that these programmes
Standard, 2008; Tsim et al, 2002), including the eight
were not generating the anticipated improvements (Lam,
management principles (Quality Standard, 2008; Beattie and
1997). The key reason for this gap between quality
Sohal, 1999; Tsim et al, 2002) on which the family of
improvement expectations and the realisation of benefits is the
standards is based. ISO 9001 deals with the requirements that
absence of an effective quality planning process before its
organization wishing to meet the standard they have to fulfill.
implementation (Juran and Godfrey, 2000). Thus, quality
In order to integrate the quality management system within the
planning is identified as the most significant phase in a
context of construction management, the need to study the
corporate quality management process requiring more
elements in standard guidelines of quality management system
attention.
is essential to ensure the standardization of the quality
It is almost a commonplace to describe the current business
management system is successful.
environmental setting as turbulent. The marketplace has
A detailed and clear job responsibility description is
become more global and service oriented and clients’ tastes
important to ensure that each of the project team members
have become more demanding and sophisticated (Albino et al.,
understand their responsible in order to achieve the required
2002). Under this circumstance, many firms have found it is
objectives. Besides that, the annual management review needs
increasing difficulties to compete. To survive in the current
to be conduct by the top management to ensure the
business environment, it is necessary to look for ways to
effectiveness of implementing the Quality Management
improve quality and productivity in order to enhance their
System. On top of that, the availability of the resources is
competitive edges (Tan et al., 2003).
important for smooth construction process and the top
management also needs to plan the optimal usage of the
resources. An effective planning requires the organization to
III. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
plan for the resources and the construction work by providing
the work programme, cost programme, project quality plan,
labour, material and plant schedule, construction method The methodology for the work consists of three step
statement and inspection and test plan. Consequently, it will model. The first step is quality planning, second step is quality
become as the core reference for the construction process control and third step is quality assurance. In the first step the
control and conformance and performance measurement questionnaires have been prepared by authors considering
processes. According to Lydia (2010), the guidelines to ensure quality aspects of construction project. The questionnaires
the quality in planning are: have been prepared by authors based on quality aspects in
Advances and Research in Civil Engineering and Technology - Construction Management 324
Proceedings of the Civil Engineering PG Conference 2015, Held at MAEER’s MIT, Pune-411038, 24-25 April 2015.
construction project for builder / contractor, consultants and 9 Site review meetings with staff 4.48
customers / occupants of buildings.. The study describes the 10 Observe regular schedule 4.48
rating aspects based on importance on five-point scale for 11 Keep spare parts/materials for
4.44
analysis of data collected during interviews with builder / laboratory equipments
contractor. In second step the interviews of participants of 12 Practice sound housekeeping
4.32
construction project (builder / contractor) have been conducted methods
by the author. 13 Regularly maintain the formats 4.52
The respondents are having position of project manager, 14 Specify
project engineer at construction projects with experience not
less than fifteen years. The number of questions will be asked III Quality management during
to them and the various optional points for some questions are planning and designing phase
provided. The respondents has to rate these points on five- of construction projects.
point rating scale. The scale description is as “5= Very Strong, 1 coordination with the all activities 4.72
4= Strong, 3= Moderate, 2= Less, 1= Very less”. In the 2 Maintain sequence of
4.52
analysis of data all the options of questions have been studied construction drawings
and the findings have mentioned in the subsequent section of 3 Review meetings 4.72
paper. 4 Observe regular schedule 4.76
Advances and Research in Civil Engineering and Technology - Construction Management 325
Proceedings of the Civil Engineering PG Conference 2015, Held at MAEER’s MIT, Pune-411038, 24-25 April 2015.
Weighted average = a1y1+a2y2+a3y3+a4y4+a5y5 The very strongly quality tool used at construction project is
check lists. The quality control measure used at site is quality
of workmanship in all activities. Very strongly respondent’s
Where,
responses as observe regular schedule for Quality management
a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 are the frequency of rating aspect ranging
during planning and designing phase of construction projects.
from 5 to 1 and y1, y2, y3, y4, y5 are the percentages The Barriers to working of project team with respect to quality
corresponding to a1, a2, a3, a4, a5 respectively. is poor planning. Also respondents have very strongly given
importance to the customer satisfaction. As per opinion of
respondents implementation of quality management plan on
V. DISCUSSIONS & FINDINGS site is also important and also more importance is to be given
for test reports from suppliers instead of physical testing on
As stated in research methodology the author distributed 30 site.
sets of questionnaires among the participants of construction The survey suggests that customer’s satisfaction is always
project configuring experiences and positions mentioned in important provided that satisfaction of all other participants of
earlier section. The 25 respondents have responded for the project is also important.
same. After scrutinizing the data of responses of respondents It also reveals that importance of total quality management
the following findings have been mentioned in detail. at construction projects.
The eight questions have been asked also optional points for After study of all above points the researcher reached the
some questions are provided to them. following concluding remarks as below,
As per the responses of respondents the most important Satisfaction of all stakeholders in the industry.
quality tool used at construction site is check lists followed by Better understanding on quality control procedure.
flow chart, pareto analysis, check sheets, statistical analysis, Satisfaction of Client.
histogram, control chart and scatter diagram. Suitable quality control method for the project.
The quality control measure used on construction site is the Development of the quality of strength in construction.
quality of workmanship in all construction activities followed Total Quality Management at construction projects.
by quality Control laboratory at site, Maintain sequence of
construction, Regularly maintain the formats, Study duties and
responsibilities, Site review meetings with staff, Observe REFERENCES
regular schedule, Do proper sampling and testing, Set
[1] AbdulAziz A.B. and Tawfiq, H.A. (1999). ISO 9000 Quality Standards
procedures to control quality, Keep spare parts/materials for in Construction, Journal of Management in Engineering, Nov/Dec, pp.
laboratory equipments, Follow the prescribed curing and 41.
deshuttering schedules, Practice sound housekeeping methods [2] Abdul Rahim, A.H et al. (2004). Integration of Safety, Health,
and Coordination with the project purchase department. Environment and Quality (SHEQ) Management System in Construction:
A Review. Jurnal Kejuruteraan Awam, Vol 16(1): 24-37, pp. 14.
As per responses of respondents the important aspects of [3] Arditi, D. and Gunaydin, H.M. (1998), “Factors that affect process
quality management during planning and designing phase of quality in the life cycle of building projects”, Journal of Construction
construction projects are Observe regular schedule followed Engineering and Management, ASCE, Vol. 124 No. 3, pp. 194-203.
by Review meetings, coordination with the all activities and [4] Chin, K. S., & Choi, T. W. (2003). Construction in Hong Kong: Success
factors for ISO 9000 implementation. Journal of Construction
Maintain sequence of construction drawings. Engineering and Management, November/December, 599-609.
The analysis of next question indicates that the barriers to [5] Checkland, P.B. & Scholes, J. (1990) Soft Systems Methodology in
working of project team with respect to quality as Lack of Action. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
customer focus followed by Poor Planning, Lack of proper
Advances and Research in Civil Engineering and Technology - Construction Management 326
Proceedings of the Civil Engineering PG Conference 2015, Held at MAEER’s MIT, Pune-411038, 24-25 April 2015.
[6] Giles, R. 1997. ISO 9000 perspective for construction industry in the
UK. Training for Quality, Vol. 5 No. 4, pp 178-181.
[7] ISO. (2004) The ISO survey of ISO 9001:2000 and ISO 14001
certificates 2003. <http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/iso9000-14000.
[8] Low, S. P. (1994, April). ISO 9000: Implementation problems in the
construction industry. Quality World, 228-234.
[9] Lang, J.C. (2001b), “Managing in knowledge-based competition”.
Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 14, No. 6, 539-
553.
[10] Lydia (2010). The Integration of Quality Management System in
Construction Industry. Submitted version Master’s Thesis, Universiti
Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia. pp. 32-38
[11] Quality Standard, What is ISO 9000 and ISO 9001 (2008). Retrieved
November 2, 2011from http://www.dennemeyer.com/content/en/quality-
standard.html
[12] Rittel, H.J., and Webber, M.M. (1984). "Planning Problems are Wicked
Problems." In N.Cross (Ed.), Developments in Design Methodology.
Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 135-144.
[13] Santos, A. dos., Powell, A. F., and Sarshar, M. (2002). “Evolution of
management theory: the case of production management in
construction”, Management Decision, 40(8), 788-796.
[14] Taylor, W. A., & Wright, G. H. (2003). The impact of senior managers’
commitment on the success of TQM programmes—an empirical study.
International Journal of Manpower, 24(5), 535-550.
[15] Yasamis, F., Arditi, D. and Mohammadi, J. (2002). Assessing contractor
quality performance. Construction Management and Economics, 20(5):
211–223.
Guide (Head)
Department of Civil Engineering
Advances and Research in Civil Engineering and Technology - Construction Management 327
View publication stats