Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Sage Publications, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Peace Research
In fulfilling its humanitarian obligations, the ICRC is often faced with political, technical
obstacles. Since its foundation in 1863, it has none the less been able gradually to develop i
and assistance activities for the victims of armed conflicts: the wounded and sick in the f
of war, civilians in occupied territories and all those affected by hostilities. For several ye
also visited political detainees, providing strict conditions are met (repeated visits and inte
witnesses, access to all detainees in all places of detention). Moreover, in its large-scale reli
the ICRC insists on being allowed to make on-site assessments of the needs of conflict
carry out all distribution operations itself. It closely monitors the implementation of
humanitarian law, but cannot replace States in settling the political differences underlying
inside Afghanistan. However, it opened thea disturbances (Israel and the occupied
hospital in Peshawar (June, 1981) and one
territories, Lebanon, the Philippines, El Sal-
in Quetta (July, 1983) where Afghan refu-
vador, etc.) or because it likes to keep con-
gees in Pakistan may receive care. It is
tacts in as many countries as possible in
regions which are calmer but none the less
allowed access, albeit too rarely, to prisoners
held by the Afghan resistance movement, also breed tension (and where its regional
but the activities it is able to carry out delegations
on cover several countries at once,
their behalf fall far short of the protection as
to in New Delhi, Hong Kong, Lagos,
which all the victims of the conflict, whichHarare, Bogota, etc.).
has been going on since 1979, are entitledIt is not unusual for the ICRC to have
under the Conventions. In February 1987, to deal with power changes in countries or
however, the ICRC was allowed to resumeregions beset by conflicts or even revol-
its protection and assistance activitiesutions.
in Thus, the ICRC maintained del-
Kabul itself. egations in Zimbabwe, Iran and Nicaragua
Another obstacle, actually more technical despite the considerable political changes
which recently swept those countries. In
than political, is distance. In order to reach
order to maintain its activities on behalf of
starving civilians or to visit prisoners, long
stretches of rough terrain must often be the persons affected by these changes, the
covered, sometimes even on foot. Some ICRC, for purely humanitarian reasons,
regions can be supplied only by air. Thus, maintains a policy of constant political
relief activities in Angola, southern Sudan,neutrality.
Ethiopia and, in 1979-80, along the border In order to understand the motivation
between Thailand and Kampuchea, requiredbehind that policy, characterized by both
the establishment of vast and complex trans- caring (assistance to victims) and impartiality
portation systems. (political, ideological and religious
These observations bring to mind anotherneutrality), it is helpful to trace its origin.
difficulty, lack of resources. Relief opera-The humanitarian commitment of the ICRC
tions in major emergencies require people stems from a history rife with trials and tribu-
and equipment on a large scale, and arelations. A knowledge of the institution's
therefore very costly. Moreover, emerg-birth and development provides a better
encies go on for ever, or rather, they recur. understanding of today's ICRC and its
Emergency action should be followed by resolve to have access to all the victims of
socio-economic reconstruction and develop-conflicts.
ment work, but this is far from being the rule.
Under the sway of emotion and bolstered by 3. The First Years
public opinion, donor countries or agenciesThe ICRC, comprising at the outset five
generally offer considerable financial and persons belonging to a Genevese circle of
material aid during the first phase of a relief 'philanthropists', saw itself merely as the pro-
operation. Economic problems emerge moter of an idea. At first glance, nothing
later, when public and government interest marked it out for direct intervention in pris-
wanes. The difficulty of financing ICRC oner camps or among the civilian victims of
activities in Africa and in the Middle East combats.' Such work 'in the field' was in fact
provides a good illustration of this point.
not to be systematically undertaken by the
ICRC
It is easier to launch an operation than to until the early 1900s, although the
Committee sent occasional missions to the
maintain it once financial support dimin-
ishes. However, perseverance, tenacity and as early as 1864.
front
continuity are precisely what is required'Relief
in societies' were constituted and, as
the case of assistance to conflict victims. The
of 1872, adopted the red cross as their
ICRC is characterized by activities which
emblem.2 They were to intervene in time of
war and, gradually, also in time of peace.
last. More and more frequently now, it works
in one country for several years, either
The ICRC itself was to remain an institution
because there is no substantial abatement in active primarily in time of armed conflict,
which was to make it a special body within namely civilians, who were very poorly pro-
the world of the Red Cross and within the
tected, yet increasingly affected by hostilities
international political community. The
in which they took no part. During the inter-
ICRC is, in fact, a private Swiss institution
war period, the ICRC spared no effort to
whose delegates are exclusively Swiss citi-
enhance the protection of civilians. Unfor-
zens. It is none the less totally independent
tunately, of the proposals made by the ICRC
from the Swiss Government (as it is fromfrom
all 1923 onwards, only the provisions con-
other governments), and all its activities are
cerning prisoners of war were to be adopted
by States, who signed a Convention on the
governed by the strict principle of neutrality
(political, ideological and religious). subject
The in 1929 (Convention Relative to the
Treatment of Prisoners of War). It would
ICRC is international by its field of activity
and its financing which is ensured, fortaketheanother cruel war to bring the States to
most part, by voluntary government con- accept - at least partially - responsibility
tributions (the States signatory to for the the protection of civilians. During the
Geneva Conventions). same period, the ICRC carried out several
relief operations, particularly in the fol-
Although the National Societies rapidly
grew and flourished, often giving rise at lowing
the conflicts:
same time to improved army medical struc-
- The Russian Civil War (1917-1921),
tures, the development of what was later
where ICRC intervention took the form
to be called international humanitarian law
of a large-scale international relief opera-
(IHL) had yet to be undertaken. This prac-
tion on behalf of Russian refugees. This
tical preoccupation was soon to lead the
ICRC to its involvement in the field. was the departure point for a refugee
While the first humanitarian Conventions assistance scheme which engendered the
Office of the High Commissioner for Refu-
concluded in Geneva in 18643 guaranteed gees. The representatives of High Com-
respect for armies in the field - shelter and
missioner Nansen were, for the most part,
care for troops whatever their nationality - ICRC delegates. The ICRC took advan-
no provisions had been made enabling pris-
tage of the infrastructure used to repatri-
oners to communicate with their families or,
ate prisoners at the end of the First World
inversely, for families to receive information
War, and proved particularly useful wher-
about prisoners. It was in response to this
ever a neutral intermediary was
need that the ICRC opened, during the necessary.
Franco-German war in 1870, an Agency for
the Wounded in Armies soon to be followed
- The war between Italy and Ethiopia
(1936), which marked the beginning of
by an Agency for Prisoners of War respon-
ICRC assistance, especially medical, to
sible for the establishment of lists of pris- areas outside Europe.
oners and for the exchange of letters and,
- The Spanish Civil War (1936-1938), dur-
later, packages. To ensure the distribution
ing which the ICRC carried out large-
of relief consignments (then provided by the
scale relief operations to aid civilians
families or by the authorities of the native
while simultaneously engaging in difficult
country of the prisoners of war), the ICRC
activities concerned with prisoners and
sent delegates to prison hospitals and camps.
This initiative was to become a tradition as
hostages on both sides (visits, exchanges).
These operations also demonstrated the
the ICRC undertook an increasing number need to establish humanitarian norms for
of humanitarian activities in the very midst internal conflicts.
of conflicts. It thus organized large-scale
4. The Second World War and the Geneva
assistance operations for prisoners of war
during the First World War (yet still withConventions
no
firm base in any convention!). The relief services set up by the ICRC during
In addition to the wounded in armies and the Spanish Civil War were still functioning
prisoners of war, the ICRC was deeply con- in 1939. They rapidly became the core of
cerned about another category of victims, the relief network in operation during the
ing to use its offices and those of other humanitarian Law is meaningful only insofar as it is com-
organizations as a way of postponing, perhaps plied with. The ICRC strives to ensure that
indefinitely, difficult political compromises in favor
compliance both through the dissemination
of continual, uncompromising, ever-encroaching
war (Shawcross 1984, p. 428, see also Rufin 1986). of the law and through the careful moni-
toring of its application in the course of
These considerations, although not alone armed conflicts.
sufficient to challenge all humanitarian
action, merit reflection. They touch upon an NOTES
essential aspect of the humanitarian activity 1. The ICRC staff currently includes over six hundre
of the ICRC, which strives to relieve the employees working in Geneva and about 450 col
suffering of victims by all possible means laborators sent on mission from headquarters, not
without ever sacrificing them to political con- counting some 2,000 employees engaged locally. In
1978, the ICRC had 18 delegations. By late 1986
siderations. One might even ask whether that number had grown to 37, spread across th
the contribution of humanitarian action does world.
not, in alleviating the tragic fate of civilians,
2. During its war against Russia, Turkey, on 16 Nov-
decrease the pressure on governments toember 1876, informed the Swiss Federal Council,
negotiate a political solution to the dif- depository of the Geneva Convention of 1864, that
it had adopted a new emblem, the red crescent.
ferences which oppose them. That suspicion Turkey nevertheless agreed to respect the red cross
should above all arouse the concern of States
emblem displayed by Russian troops. It was not until
and intergovernmental agencies. Neither the 1929 that the red crescent was officially recognized
ICRC nor any of the other numerous non-as having the same protection value as the red cross.
3. Geneva Convention of 22 August 1864for the Ameli-
governmental organizations can resolve theoration of the Conditions of the Wounded in Armies
conflicts that cause the human suffering in the Field. On the development of humanitarian
necessitating their intervention. law, see the article by Jacques Meurant in this issue.
4. It should be recalled that, because the Soviet Union
These observations bring us back to our
had not signed the Convention of 1929, the ICRC
point of departure. The ICRC, striving in was unable to undertake any relief operations on
the midst of conflicts to curb their effects and
behalf of German prisoners of war in Soviet hands
assist their victims, is well aware of the horror or of Soviet prisoners in German camps.
of warfare and has no greater desire than 5. The paragraph concerning ICRC work in Article 3
to see it cease. However, the settlement of reads as follows: 'An impartial humanitarian body,
differences which underlie conflicts remains such as the International Committee of the Red Cross,
may offer its services to the Parties to the conflict'.
a highly political task. In that respect, the
6. The International Conference of the Red Cross
ICRC can at most aspire, by acting as a meets in principle every four years. It brings together
neutral intermediary between the parties to all the delegates of the International Movement of
the Red Cross and Red Crescent (the ICRC, the
the conflict and by helping to maintain some
League of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies,
humanity in the midst of the fighting, to the National Societies) and representatives of the
foster a climate favourable to negotiations. States Parties to the Geneva Conventions.
The ICRC sees its work above all within The Twenty-Fifth Conference, held in Geneva in
the framework of international humanitarian October 1986, revised the Statutes of the Movement.
Article 5, which concerns the mandate of the ICRC,
law, the full respect of which would already states in particular:
greatly reduce many of the ills of war. A high '(The role of ICRC is) to endeavour at all times -
official of the ICRC said in that respect that: as a neutral institution whose humanitarian work is
carried out particularly in time of international and
The main problem is to ensure compliance with, other armed conflicts or internal strife - to ensure
rather than development of, the existing law. If the the protection of and assistance to military and civilian
States would only observe the rules which have victims of such events and of their direct results'.
already been laid down, 80% of our problems would Further: 'The International Committee may take any
be solved. Observance of the existing body of law is humanitarian initiative which comes within its role as
a more important issue than further development of a specifically neutral and independent institution and
it. Governments and peoples should not be led to intermediary, and may consider any question requir-
believe that more law could be a remedy. What is ing examination by such an institution'.
needed is greater political will to comply with the7. It should be noted that these conditions are anal-
existing norms (Moreillon in: Bedjaoui 1986, pp. ogous to those which the Third Geneva Convention
56-57. Emphasis added.). provides for prisoners of war (Article 126).