81,9(56,7,781+866(,12110$/$<6,$

)DFXOW\RI0HFKDQLFDODQG0DQXIDFWXULQJ(QJLQHHULQJ
BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB

DEPARTMENTOFENGINEERINGMECHANICS
MECHANICSOFMACHINES&DYNAMICSLABORATORY

INDIVIDUALLABORATORYREPORT
BDA37401ENGINEERINGMECHANICSLABORATORYII

EXPERIMENTTITTLE:
 BELT FRICTION


NoMatrik/Matrices
Namapelajar/NameofStudent 
MUHAMMAD AFNAN BIN CHE MAZLAN CD200117

Seksyen/Section
Kumpulan/Group 
12C 12
1. MISS NUR FARAHALYA BINTI RHAZALI
NamaPensyarah/Pengajar/Tutor/ 
Lecturer/Instructor/Tutor’sName 2.

NamaAhliKumpulan/ No.
Penilaian/Assesment
GroupMembers Matrik

MUHAMMAD AZAMUDDIN
1. BIN

 AMRAN AD190237 

MUHAMMAD FARHAN 
2. 
CD200186
Keputusan/Results 30%
 HAMIZI
BIN 
 
3. MUHAMMAD SHAHRIZAN 
 ROSLI
BIN CD200058

NABIL SYAHMI BIN
4. 
CD200068
ROSLI



5. NAVINN A/L VIJIVAKUMAR 
DD200050
Perbincangan/Discussions 70% 


TarikhUjikaji/Date

ofExperiment
TarikhHantar/Date
 
ofSubmission JUMLAH/TOTAL 100%


ULASANPEMERIKSA/COMMENTS

 COPDITERIMA/APPROVEDSTAMP





 TOPIC 5 : BELT FRICTION

1900 500 1800 500 1500 500 1300 500

2900 700 2500 700 2000 700 1700 700
4000 900 3200 900 2800 900 2300 900
5000 1100 4000 1100 3200 1100 2700 1100
6200 1300 4700 1300 3800 1300 3200 1300

18.639 13.734 17.658 12.753 14.715 9.81 12.753 7.848

28.449 21.582 24.525 17.658 19.62 12.753 16.677 9.81
39.24 30.411 31.392 22.563 27.468 18.639 22.563 13.734
49.05 38.259 39.24 28.449 31.392 20.601 26.487 15.696
60.822 48.069 46.107 33.354 37.278 24.525 31.392 18.639
1.2903 1.3846 1.5114 1.6716

0.1107 0.1413 0.1794 0.2231

1900 500 900 500 700 500

2900 700 1000 700 900 700
4000 900 1200 900 1100 900
5000 1100 1600 1100 1300 1100
6200 1300 1800 1300 1600 1300

18.639 4.905 13.734 8.829 4.905 3.924 6.867 4.905 1.962

28.449 6.867 21.582 9.81 6.867 2.943 8.829 6.867 1.962

39.24 8.829 30.411 11.772 8.829 2.943 10.791 8.829 1.962

49.05 38.259 15.696 10.791 4.905 12.753 10.791 1.962

10.791
60.822 12.753 48.069 17.658 12.753 4.905 15.696 12.753 2.943
Discussion

a)

T1 vs T2 ( for 90°)
70
60.822
60
49.05
50
39.24
40
T1 (N)

28.449
30
18.639
20

10

0
13.734 21.582 30.411 38.259 48.069
T2 (N)

Figure 1

T1 vs T2 ( for 120°)
50 46.107
45
39.24
40
35 31.392
30
24.525
T1 (N)

25
17.658
20
15
10
5
0
12.753 17.658 22.563 28.449 33.354
T2 (N)

Figure 2
 T1 vs T2 ( for 150°)
40 37.278

35
31.392

30 27.468

25
19.62
T1 (N)

20
14.715
15

10

0
9.81 12.753 18.639 20.601 24.525
T2 (N)

Figure 3

T1 vs T2 ( for 180°)
35
31.392

30
26.487

25 22.563

20
T1 (N)

16.677

15 12.753

10

0
7.848 9.81 13.734 15.696 18.639
T2 (N)

Figure 4
b)
Refer to the graph obtain in figure 1 ,2 ,3 and 4 as we can see the value of the driving force is
decrease when the angle of lap is increase like we can see at figure 1 the driving force at
maximum is 60.822N for T1 and 48.069N for T2 at 90 degree. While on figure 4 its show that
the maximum driving force is 31.392N for T1 and 18.639N for T2 at 180degree angle of lap. So
its show that when driving force is decrease with the angle of lap will increased.

𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒆[𝑻𝟏⁄𝑻𝟐] 𝒗𝒔 𝑨𝒏𝒈𝒍𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒂𝒑

0.25
0.2231

0.2
0.1794

0.15 0.1413

0.1107

0.1

0.05

0
90° 120° 150° 180°

Coefficient of friction,

𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒆 [𝑻𝟏 ⁄𝑻𝟐 ] = 𝝁𝜽

𝒍𝒐𝒈𝒆 [𝑻𝟏 ⁄𝑻𝟐 ]

=𝝁
𝜽

For 90 degree,

0.1107
= 0.0705
1.5708
For 120 degree,

0.1413
= 0.0675
2.094

For 150 degree,

0.1794
= 0.0685
2.618

For 180 degree,

0.2231
= 0.0710
3.142

Conclusion, the calculation showed that the 180 degree have a highest coefficient while 120
degree have the lowest.
c)

(T1-T2) vs T1 ( Flat Belt)

60

48.069
50

38.259
40
T1-T2 (N)

30.41
30
21.582
20
13.734

10

0
18.639 28.449 39.24 49.05 60.822
T1 (N)

(T1-T2) vs T1 ( V-Belt Large Groove)

6

4.905 4.905
5

3.924
4
T1-T2 (N)

2.943 2.943
3

0
8.829 9.81 11.772 15.696 17.658
T1 (N)
 (T1-T2) vs T1 ( V-Belt with correct/fit groove)
3.5

2.943
3

2.5

1.962 1.962 1.962 1.962

2
T1-T2 (N)

1.5

0.5

0
6.867 8.829 10.791 12.753 15.696
T1 (N)
Question

Transmission Belt
Advantages Disadvantages
The process is smooth and quiet. They put a lot of strain on shafts and
bearings.

They are long-lasting and require minimal In comparison to other modes of power
maintenance. transmission, it has a short service life.

Belt drives are capable of absorbing shock There is a significant loss of power.
and dampening vibration

Have the ability to transmit power over a Speed range is limited.

long distance

Roller chain
Advantages Disadvantages

The performance is unaffected by It will making a lot of noise and can produce
temperature or environmental factors. a lot of vibrations

Have a very high efficiency It need tensioning device modifications for

slack

Both long and short distances can use. It need to be lubricated on a regular basis

Did not easy to slip Not suitable for shafts that are not parallel.