Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edu 203
11/21/21
In 1972 a lawsuit was filed, and it would be one of the most important cases involving
children with disabilities and it would lay some of the most important foundations for the IDEA
Act. Seven students who lived in the District of Columbia were all denied of educational services
and were disregarded from their public school they were categorized as either having behavioral
problems emotionally disturbed or mentally challenged. These children were denied going to
public school because the schools claimed that they did not have the funding for services that
these children needed and that it would cost the schools millions of dollars to treat and educated
these children and it would not have been fair to the general education classes to provide that
funding elsewhere. These children had no other alternatives for schooling, private schooling was
costly, and parents couldn’t afford it. Mills VS. Board of education was one of the most
important cases that helped lay the foundation that eventually led to the passage of Section 504
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Education for All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA)
In the early 20th century mistreatment of people with learning, behavioral, mental, and
physical disabilities was so common and almost normal but throughout the century it took long
and hard fights to get the appropriate education for their specific learning needs. This is a
landmark case because it better helped people in special education reach their potential and laid
some of the most foundational aspects of the act IDEA. In this case the defense who was the
Board of Education of the District of Columbia, argued that education was only beneficial to
those who could make use of it, and that the school didn’t have enough funding to provide for
special education because it would take away from the general education curriculum and it
wouldn’t be fair to those in the general education classroom. Although the case only included
Snyder
seven exceptional children the parent were the faces of the case and represented thousands of
The case went to the supreme court because it was just one of many cases that was filled
regarding the treatment of students that needed an alternative education course besides the
general curriculum, especially black students. The parents sued on behalf of all the students that
were being mistreated by the education system in the District of Columbia and demanded better
conditions or alternative schooling for free. For too long children with learning, behavioral
disabilities have been neglected and were not being taken care of because the education system
was rooted in racism and misunderstanding about these marginalized groups of people, who
The judge who was assigned to the case was Judge Joseph Cornelius Waddy, and the
supreme court ruled that education services must be provided free of charge to every student’s
exclusive needs. Further, the court also stated that it was inexcusable to safeguard funding
instead of providing education for every student. Funding for special education needed to
become a priority for public school and assessments needed to be provided to those to needed it.
The court adopted a plan to ensure that students had an equal opportunity under the law.
Although in the early 20th century special education was a topic that was often scrutinized and
disregarded after this court case, it made it so more accessible to those who needed it.
Snyder
“Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia.” Civil Liberties and Civil Rights in the
persons/438-mills-v-board-of-education-of-the-district-of-columbia.
“Mills v. Board of Education and Its Effect on the Field of Special Education.” Colleen
education-and-its-effect-on-the-field-of-special-eduction.
Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia: Summary & Significance Video. “Mills v.
Board of Education of District of Columbia: Summary & Significance - Video & Lesson
education-of-district-of-columbia-summary-significance