STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

This study aims to propose an agritourism development plan for the Municipality of San
Jose, Batangas. Specifically, the researchers aim to answer the following:

1. What is the profile of respondents in San Jose, Batangas in terms of:

1.1 Gender
1.2 Civil Status
1.3 Age
1.4 Education
1.5 Occupation
1.6 Monthly Income

2. What is the Community perception on Agri – Tourism Development in San Jose

Batangas in terms of:

2.1 Social Aspect

2.2 Cultural Aspect
2.3 Economic Aspect
2.4 Environmental Aspect

3. Is there a significant difference between the profile of respondents and their

evaluation on San Jose, Batangas?

4. What plan of action needed to attain sustainable development on agri-tourism in San

Jose, Batangas?

CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Age Sex CivilStatus EducationalAttinment Occupation MonthlyIncome BY
SocialImpact CulturalImpact EconomicImpact EnvironmentalImpact
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ PHI
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.

Crosstabs
 Notes

Output Created 18-SEP-2020 14:30:33

Comments
Input Data D:\PRELL\For STAT\College
2020\CTHM\Pingkit De Torres\Complete Data
less 1.1 Pingkit.sav
Active Dataset DataSet1
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working Data File 376
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined missing values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table are based on all the
cases with valid data in the specified range(s)
for all variables in each table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=Age Sex CivilStatus
EducationalAttinment Occupation
MonthlyIncome BY SocialImpact
CulturalImpact EconomicImpact
EnvironmentalImpact
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ PHI
/CELLS=COUNT EXPECTED
/COUNT ROUND CELL
/BARCHART.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:02.69

Elapsed Time 00:00:02.60

Dimensions Requested 2

Cells Available 174734

Note:
Watch these videos for interpretation
https://youtu.be/kfVttzUB67M
https://youtu.be/LUuLGLGI650?t=10
https://youtu.be/wfIfEWMJY3s?t=4
https://youtu.be/JmaL62bDsf8?t=517

You may also read this article https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/chi-square-statistic.asp

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Age * SocialImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%

Age * CulturalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Age * EconomicImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Age * EnvironmentalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Sex * SocialImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Sex * CulturalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Sex * EconomicImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Sex * EnvironmentalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Civil Status * SocialImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Civil Status * CulturalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Civil Status * EconomicImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Civil Status *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EnvironmentalImpact
Educational Attinment *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
SocialImpact
Educational Attinment *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
CulturalImpact
Educational Attinment *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EconomicImpact
Educational Attinment *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EnvironmentalImpact
Occupation * SocialImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Occupation * CulturalImpact
376 100.0% 0
0.0% 376 100.0%
Occupation * EconomicImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Occupation *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EnvironmentalImpact
Monthly Income * SocialImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Monthly Income * CulturalImpact 376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
Monthly Income *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EconomicImpact
Monthly Income *
376 100.0% 0 0.0% 376 100.0%
EnvironmentalImpact

Age * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact Total

SD D A SA

Age 19 & below Count 0 1 10 20 31

Expected Count .2 .2 9.2 21.4 31.0

20-29 Count 2 0 32 80 114

Expected Count .9 .9 33.7 78.5 114.0

30-39 Count 0 1 29 82 112

Expected Count .9 .9 33.1 77.1 112.0

40-49 Count 1 0 24 50 75

Expected Count .6 .6 22.1 51.7 75.0

50-59 Count 0 1 10 19 30

Expected Count .2 .2 8.9 20.7 30.0

60--above Count 0 0 6 8 14

Expected Count .1 .1 4.1 9.6 14.0

Total Count 3 3 111 259 376

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0 259.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests
 Asymp. Sig. (2-
Value df sided)
a
Pearson Chi-Square 12.101 15 .671
Likelihood Ratio 12.674 15 .627
Linear-by-Linear Association .276 1 .599
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .11.

Sample interpretation:

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .179 .671

Cramer's V .104 .671

N of Valid Cases 376
Age * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Age 19 & below Count 0 5 16 10 31

Expected Count 1.0 7.7 17.2 5.1 31.0

20-29 Count 4 26 62 22 114

 Expected Count
3.6 28.2
63.4 18.8 114.0

30-39 Count 2 24 73 13 112

Expected Count 3.6 27.7 62.3 18.5 112.0

40-49 Count 2 20 41 12 75

Expected Count 2.4 18.6 41.7 12.4 75.0

50-59 Count 2 14 10 4 30

Expected Count 1.0 7.4 16.7 4.9 30.0

60--above Count 2 4 7 1 14

Expected Count .4 3.5 7.8 2.3 14.0

Total Count 12 93 209 62 376

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0 62.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 28.450a 15 .019

Likelihood Ratio 25.429 15 .044
Linear-by-Linear Association 11.919 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 9 cells (37.5%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.45.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .275 .019

Cramer's V .159 .019

N of Valid Cases 376
Age * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact Total

SD D A SA

Age 19 & below Count 0 0 16 15 31

Expected Count .3 .2 7.0 23.4 31.0

20-29 Count 3 2 34 75 114

 Expected Count
1.2 .9
25.8 86.1 114.0

30-39 Count 0 0 17 95 112

Expected Count 1.2 .9 25.3 84.6 112.0

40-49 Count 1 0 10 64 75

Expected Count .8 .6 17.0 56.6 75.0

50-59 Count 0 1 2 27 30

Expected Count .3 .2 6.8 22.7 30.0

60--above Count 0 0 6 8 14

Expected Count .1 .1 3.2 10.6 14.0

Total Count 4 3 85 284 376

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0 284.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 44.061a 15 .000

Likelihood Ratio 44.427 15 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 10.384 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .11.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .342 .000

Cramer's V .198 .000

N of Valid Cases 376
Age * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Age 19 & below Count 2 1 15 13 31

Expected Count .5 .3 7.6 22.6 31.0

20-29 Count 2 2 33 77 114

 Expected Count
1.8 1.2
27.9 83.1 114.0

30-39 Count 0 0 27 85 112

Expected Count 1.8 1.2 27.4 81.6 112.0

40-49 Count 1 0 11 63 75

Expected Count 1.2 .8 18.4 54.7 75.0

50-59 Count 1 1 2 26 30

Expected Count .5 .3 7.3 21.9 30.0

60--above Count 0 0 4 10 14

Expected Count .2 .1 3.4 10.2 14.0

Total Count 6 4 92 274 376

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0 274.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 34.506a 15 .003

Likelihood Ratio 36.477 15 .002
Linear-by-Linear Association 13.054 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 13 cells (54.2%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .15.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .303 .003

Cramer's V .175 .003

N of Valid Cases 376
Sex * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact Total

SD D A SA

Sex Female Count 1 2 45 142 190

Expected Count 1.5 1.5 56.1 130.9 190.0

Male Count 2 1 66 117 186

 Expected Count
1.5 1.5 54.9
128.1 186.0
Total Count 3 3 111 259 376

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0 259.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.011a 3 .072

Likelihood Ratio 7.051 3 .070
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.042 1 .025
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.48.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .137 .072

Cramer's V .137 .072

N of Valid Cases 376
Sex * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Sex Female Count 7 38 104 41 190

Expected Count 6.1 47.0 105.6 31.3 190.0

Male Count 5 55 105 21 186

 Expected Count
5.9 46.0 103.4
30.7 186.0
Total Count 12 93 209 62 376

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0 62.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9.856a 3 .020

Likelihood Ratio 9.991 3 .019
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.771 1 .016
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
5.94.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .162 .020

Cramer's V .162 .020

N of Valid Cases 376
Sex * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact Total

SD D A SA

Sex Female Count 2 3 46 139 190

Expected Count 2.0 1.5 43.0 143.5 190.0

Male Count 2 0 39 145 186

 Expected Count
2.0 1.5 42.0
140.5 186.0
Total Count 4 3 85 284 376

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0 284.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.661a 3 .300

Likelihood Ratio 4.820 3 .185
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.349 1 .245
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.48.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .099 .300

Cramer's V .099 .300

N of Valid Cases 376
Sex * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Sex Female Count 3 4 54 129 190

Expected Count 3.0 2.0 46.5 138.5 190.0

Male Count 3 0 38 145 186

 Expected Count
3.0 2.0 45.5
135.5 186.0
Total Count 6 4 92 274 376

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0 274.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.675a 3 .053

Likelihood Ratio 9.234 3 .026
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.129 1 .042
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.98.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .143 .053

Cramer's V .143 .053

N of Valid Cases 376
Civil Status * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact Total

SD D A SA

Civil Status Single Count 2 1 44 101 148

Expected Count 1.2 1.2 43.7 101.9 148.0

Married Count 1 1 60 148 210

 Expected Count
1.7 1.7
62.0 144.7 210.0

Widowed Count 0 1 7 10 18

Expected Count .1 .1 5.3 12.4 18.0

Total Count 3 3 111 259 376

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0 259.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.543a 6 .274

Likelihood Ratio 4.728 6 .579
Linear-by-Linear Association .009 1 .924
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 6 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.14.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .142 .274

Cramer's V .100 .274

N of Valid Cases 376
Civil Status * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Civil Status Single Count 5 31 84 28 148

Expected Count 4.7 36.6 82.3 24.4 148.0

Married Count 7 56 116 31 210

 Expected Count
6.7 51.9
116.7 34.6 210.0

Widowed Count 0 6 9 3 18

Expected Count .6 4.5 10.0 3.0 18.0

Total Count 12 93 209 62 376

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0 62.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 3.370a 6 .761

Likelihood Ratio 3.923 6 .687
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.292 1 .256
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 4 cells (33.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.57.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .095 .761

Cramer's V .067 .761

N of Valid Cases 376
Civil Status * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact Total

SD D A SA

Civil Status Single Count 3 2 49 94 148

Expected Count 1.6 1.2 33.5 111.8 148.0

Married Count 1 0 29 180 210

 Expected Count
2.2 1.7
47.5 158.6 210.0

Widowed Count 0 1 7 10 18

Expected Count .2 .1 4.1 13.6 18.0

Total Count 4 3 85 284 376

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0 284.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 32.698a 6 .000

Likelihood Ratio 31.452 6 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 8.939 1 .003
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 7 cells (58.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.14.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .295 .000

Cramer's V .209 .000

N of Valid Cases 376
Civil Status * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Civil Status Single Count 4 3 45 96 148

Expected Count 2.4 1.6 36.2 107.9 148.0

Married Count 1 0 44 165 210

 Expected Count
3.4 2.2
51.4 153.0 210.0

Widowed Count 1 1 3 13 18

Expected Count .3 .2 4.4 13.1 18.0

Total Count 6 4 92 274 376

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0 274.0 376.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 17.373a 6 .008

Likelihood Ratio 17.330 6 .008
Linear-by-Linear Association 5.000 1 .025
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 7 cells (58.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
.19.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .215 .008

Cramer's V .152 .008

N of Valid Cases 376
Educational Attinment * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact

SD D A

Educational Attinment No Formal Education Count 0 0 7

Expected Count .1 .1 3.5

Highschool Graduate Count 1 2 44

 Expected Count

1.1 1.1 40.4

Alternative learning school Count 0 0 3

Expected Count .1 .1 3.5

Tech/Vocational Graduate Count 0 0 7

Expected Count .2 .2 7.1

College Level Count 1 0 19

Expected Count .3 .3 12.4

College Graduate Count 1 1 31

Expected Count 1.2 1.2 44.0

Total Count 3 3 111

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.332a 15 .199

Likelihood Ratio 19.310 15 .200
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.856 1 .050
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 14 cells (58.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .10.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .227 .199

Cramer's V .131 .199

N of Valid Cases 376
Educational Attinment * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact

SD D A

Educational Attinment No Formal Education Count 1 5 4

Expected Count .4 3.0 6.7

Highschool Graduate Count 5 34 75

 Expected Count

4.4 33.9 76.2

Alternative learning school Count 0 2 8

Expected Count .4 3.0 6.7

Tech/Vocational Graduate Count 1 7 14

Expected Count .8 5.9 13.3

College Level Count 3 9 22

Expected Count 1.3 10.4 23.3

College Graduate Count 2 36 86

Expected Count 4.8 36.9 82.8

Total Count 12 93 209

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10.027a 15 .818

Likelihood Ratio 10.174 15 .809
Linear-by-Linear Association .755 1 .385
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 11 cells (45.8%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .38.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .163 .818

Cramer's V .094 .818

N of Valid Cases 376
Educational Attinment * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact

SD D A

Educational Attinment No Formal Education Count 0 0 4

Expected Count .1 .1 2.7

Highschool Graduate Count 1 0 31

 Expected Count

1.5 1.1 31.0

Alternative learning school Count 0 0 2

Expected Count .1 .1 2.7

Tech/Vocational Graduate Count 0 0 4

Expected Count .3 .2 5.4

College Level Count 1 0 20

Expected Count .4 .3 9.5

College Graduate Count 2 3 24

Expected Count 1.6 1.2 33.7

Total Count 4 3 85

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 26.155a 15 .036

Likelihood Ratio 25.416 15 .045
Linear-by-Linear Association .179 1 .673
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 14 cells (58.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .10.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .264 .036

Cramer's V .152 .036

N of Valid Cases 376
Educational Attinment * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact

SD D A

Educational Attinment No Formal Education Count 0 0 1

Expected Count .2 .1 2.9

Highschool Graduate Count 4 0 35

 Expected Count

2.2 1.5 33.5

Alternative learning school Count 0 0 2

Expected Count .2 .1 2.9

Tech/Vocational Graduate Count 0 0 6

Expected Count .4 .3 5.9

College Level Count 1 2 17

Expected Count .7 .4 10.3

College Graduate Count 1 2 31

Expected Count 2.4 1.6 36.5

Total Count 6 4 92

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 21.176a 15 .131

Likelihood Ratio 21.292 15 .128
Linear-by-Linear Association .050 1 .824
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 14 cells (58.3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .13.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .237 .131

Cramer's V .137 .131

N of Valid Cases 376
Occupation * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact Total

SD D A SA

Occupation Government Count 1 0 17 48 6

Expected Count .5 .5 19.5 45.5 66.

Farming Count 0 0 28 48 7
 Expected Count
.6 .6
22.4 52.4 76.

Small enterprise Count 2 1 24 90 11

Expected Count .9 .9 34.5 80.6 117.

self-employed Count 0 0 20 31 5

Expected Count .4 .4 15.1 35.1 51.

Unemployed Count 0 2 22 42 6

Expected Count .5 .5 19.5 45.5 66.

Total Count 3 3 111 259 37

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0 259.0 376.

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 18.063a 12 .114

Likelihood Ratio 19.147 12 .085
Linear-by-Linear Association .816 1 .366
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .41.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .219 .114

Cramer's V .127 .114

N of Valid Cases 376
Occupation * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Occupation Government Count 1 22 38 5 6

Expected Count 2.1 16.3 36.7 10.9 66.

Farming Count 1 23 41 11 7
 Expected Count
2.4
18.8 42.2 12.5 76.

Small enterprise Count 2 25 67 23 11

Expected Count 3.7 28.9 65.0 19.3 117.

self-employed Count 3 11 30 7 5

Expected Count 1.6 12.6 28.3 8.4 51.

Unemployed Count 5 12 33 16 6

Expected Count 2.1 16.3 36.7 10.9 66.

Total Count 12 93 209 62 37

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0 62.0 376.

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 19.489a 12 .077

Likelihood Ratio 19.073 12 .087
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.043 1 .153
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 5 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is
1.63.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .228 .077

Cramer's V .131 .077

N of Valid Cases 376
Occupation * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact Total

SD D A SA

Occupation Government Count 1 0 3 62 6

Expected Count .7 .5 14.9 49.9 66.

Farming Count 0 0 13 63 7
 Expected Count
.8 .6
17.2 57.4 76.

Small enterprise Count 1 3 28 85 11

Expected Count 1.2 .9 26.4 88.4 117.

self-employed Count 0 0 12 39 5

Expected Count .5 .4 11.5 38.5 51.

Unemployed Count 2 0 29 35 6

Expected Count .7 .5 14.9 49.9 66.

Total Count 4 3 85 284 37

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0 284.0 376.

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 42.568a 12 .000

Likelihood Ratio 45.637 12 .000
Linear-by-Linear Association 22.330 1 .000
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .41.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .336 .000

Cramer's V .194 .000

N of Valid Cases 376
Occupation * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact Total

SD D A SA

Occupation Government Count 3 0 9 54 6

Expected Count 1.1 .7 16.1 48.1 66.

Farming Count 0 0 15 61 7
 Expected Count
1.2 .8
18.6 55.4 76.

Small enterprise Count 0 2 28 87 11

Expected Count 1.9 1.2 28.6 85.3 117.

self-employed Count 1 0 13 37 5

Expected Count .8 .5 12.5 37.2 51.

Unemployed Count 2 2 27 35 6

Expected Count 1.1 .7 16.1 48.1 66.

Total Count 6 4 92 274 37

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0 274.0 376.

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 28.566a 12 .005

Likelihood Ratio 31.177 12 .002
Linear-by-Linear Association 10.079 1 .001
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .54.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .276 .005

Cramer's V .159 .005

N of Valid Cases 376
Monthly Income * SocialImpact

Crosstab

SocialImpact

SD D A SA Total

Monthly Income Below-10,000 Count 0 2 55 70

Expected Count 1.0 1.0 37.5 87.5 12

10,001-20,000 Count 1 1 35 117

 Expected Count
1.2 15
1.2 45.5 106.1

20,001-30,000 Count 1 0 13 55

Expected Count .6 .6 20.4 47.5 6

30,001-40,000 Count 1 0 3 15

Expected Count .2 .2 5.6 13.1 1

40,001-Above Count 0 0 5 2

Expected Count .1 .1 2.1 4.8

Total Count 3 3 111 259

Expected Count 3.0 3.0 111.0 259.0 37

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 34.339a 12 .001

Likelihood Ratio 32.459 12 .001
Linear-by-Linear Association 2.771 1 .096
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .06.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .302 .001

Cramer's V .174 .001

N of Valid Cases 376
Monthly Income * CulturalImpact

Crosstab

CulturalImpact

SD D A SA Total

Monthly Income Below-10,000 Count 7 36 61 23

Expected Count 4.1 31.4 70.6 20.9 12

10,001-20,000 Count 3 35 87 29
 Expected Count
4.9 15
38.1 85.6 25.4

20,001-30,000 Count 1 19 44 5

Expected Count 2.2 17.1 38.4 11.4 6

30,001-40,000 Count 1 3 12 3

Expected Count .6 4.7 10.6 3.1 1

40,001-Above Count 0 0 5 2

Expected Count .2 1.7 3.9 1.2

Total Count 12 93 209 62

Expected Count 12.0 93.0 209.0 62.0 37

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 15.094a 12 .236

Likelihood Ratio 17.779 12 .123
Linear-by-Linear Association .992 1 .319
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 10 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .22.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .200 .236

Cramer's V .116 .236

N of Valid Cases 376
Monthly Income * EconomicImpact

Crosstab

EconomicImpact

SD D A SA Total

Monthly Income Below-10,000 Count 2 0 36 89

Expected Count 1.4 1.0 28.7 95.9 12

10,001-20,000 Count 1 3 31 119

 Expected Count
1.6 15
1.2 34.8 116.3

20,001-30,000 Count 1 0 11 57

Expected Count .7 .6 15.6 52.1 6

30,001-40,000 Count 0 0 5 14

Expected Count .2 .2 4.3 14.4 1

40,001-Above Count 0 0 2 5

Expected Count .1 .1 1.6 5.3

Total Count 4 3 85 284

Expected Count 4.0 3.0 85.0 284.0 37

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10.152a 12 .603

Likelihood Ratio 11.468 12 .489
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.609 1 .205
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .06.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .164 .603

Cramer's V .095 .603

N of Valid Cases 376
Monthly Income * EnvironmentalImpact

Crosstab

EnvironmentalImpact

SD D A SA Total

Monthly Income Below-10,000 Count 3 2 35 87

Expected Count 2.0 1.4 31.1 92.5 12

10,001-20,000 Count 2 2 39 111

 Expected Count
2.5 15
1.6 37.7 112.2

20,001-30,000 Count 0 0 11 58

Expected Count 1.1 .7 16.9 50.3 6

30,001-40,000 Count 1 0 3 15

Expected Count .3 .2 4.6 13.8 1

40,001-Above Count 0 0 4 3

Expected Count .1 .1 1.7 5.1

Total Count 6 4 92 274

Expected Count 6.0 4.0 92.0 274.0 37

Chi-Square Tests

Asymp. Sig. (2-

Value df sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 13.493a 12 .334

Likelihood Ratio 14.619 12 .263
Linear-by-Linear Association 1.588 1 .208
N of Valid Cases 376

a. 12 cells (60.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count
is .07.

Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal by Nominal Phi .189 .334

Cramer's V .109 .334

N of Valid Cases 376