Student Work Analysis Protocol

Central High School

Teacher: Subject: English 3 Period _

1) Reaching Consensus about Proficiency

a. What is the task that students are expected to do?
Short response passage to the informational text
b. Which standard is being addressed?
RI and RL 2.4
c. Is task aligned to standard being assessed? Yes ✔ No
d. What do you consider to be a proficient response on this assessment?
Identify first person POV and author's purpose in alternative suggestions to the text.
e. Did the assessment give students a good opportunity to demonstrate what they
know? Yes✔ No

2) Diagnosing Student Strengths and Needs After Reaching Consensus

Read papers and complete a "quick sort" into piles of low, Expected and High.
High-Expectations Met 70 % of Class
Expected- Partially Met 10 % of Class
Low- Not Met 20 % of Class

3) Examine low, Expected and High samples.

Identify prerequisite knowledge that students demonstrated that they knew.
What do students understand?
High:Met-
Correctly provided the author's attitude (tone) and support the answer with text
evidence.
Expected: Partially Met-
Correctly provided the attitude, however, did not provide adequate text evidence to
support answer.
Low: Not Met-
Did not correctly provide the attitude and did not provide text evidence.

4) Discuss and Identify misconceptions, incorrect information and missing

requirements/expectations.
Based on the numbers, 80% of the students met the expectations. We will continue to
review the standard.
 Formative Standard Covered: RI.2.4
Date Formative Given: 11/07/2016 to 11/14/2016

Central High Student Work Protocol

Names of Students Trends
(Strengths/Challenges)
Low-Not Met Students were not able to
20% complete the task
Instructional Strategies
We will review the standard
and work towards
competency with practice
and modeling.

Expected-Partially Met Students were able to

10% complete the task.

High-Expectations Met The students were able to

70% identify the author's
attitude (tone) and provide
text evidence.

Instructional Implications (Whole Class)

80% met or partially met the standard. Overall, the students grasped the standard.
We will continue to practice this skill.
 Facilitator's Guide

Protocol for-Analyzing Student Work Time: 55 Minutes

Roles

• Facilitator- Individual who guides the group through the protocol, watches the time and
monitors the discussion. The Facilitator may participate in the discussion; although he/she
often serves the group best by listening and using questions and comments to refocus the
group, broaden the discussion or summarize multiple points.

Time Protocol Steps

1Min Introduction: The facilitator makes sure everyone knows everyone else and
explains the protocol, including the suggested time for each step
8 Min Reaching Consensus about Proficiency
The facilitator guides participants to...
1. What is the task that the students are expected to do?
2. Which standard is being assessed?
3. Is task aligned to standard ...Yes or No
4. What do you consider to be a proficient response on the assessment?
5. Did the assessment give the students a good opportunity to demonstrate what
they know? Yes or No

15 Diagnosing Student Strengths and Needs after Reaching Consensus

Min The facilitator guides participants to.
• Read student work then do a "quick sort" of students work. Tally work on
Student Work Protocol sheet.
6 Min Examine Samples
• Choose a few samples to review from each level, discuss and identify the
prerequisite knowledge that students demonstrated that they knew.
15 Discuss and Identify
Min • Use the reviewed samples from each level, discuss and identify
misconceptions, wrong information, and what students did not demonstrate
that was expected.

10 Identify Instructional Next Steps

Min • Discuss as a team the learning needs for the students at each level.